Airport Engineering Lectures

Similar documents
According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

Airfield Capacity Prof. Amedeo Odoni

CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH Education, Analysis and Research for the Next Frontier. Airport Capacity. Outline/Notes for Class

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

Hartford-Brainard Airport Potential Runway Closure White Paper

The purpose of this Demand/Capacity. The airfield configuration for SPG. Methods for determining airport AIRPORT DEMAND CAPACITY. Runway Configuration

IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

Time-Space Analysis Airport Runway Capacity. Dr. Antonio A. Trani. Fall 2017

Ref. AIM Para AOPA Air Safety Foundation Supported by the FAA Ref. AIM Para Supported by the FAA

Las Vegas McCarran International Airport. Capacity Enhancement Plan

SPADE-2 - Supporting Platform for Airport Decision-making and Efficiency Analysis Phase 2

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016

Application of Wake Turbulence Separation at London Heathrow. Paul Johnson Development Manager NATS Heathrow

TABLE OF CONTENTS. General Study Objectives Public Involvement Issues to Be Resolved

ATC-Wake: Integrated Air Traffic Control Wake Vortex Safety and Capacity System

12 th Facilitation Division

Assignment 7: Airport Geometric Design Standards

System Oriented Runway Management: A Research Update

The demand/capacity analysis was performed utilizing Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) publications, including the following:

CATCODE ] CATCODE

Airport Planning and Terminal Design

RUNWAY OPERATIONS: Computing Runway Arrival Capacity

SIMMOD Simulation Airfield and Airspace Simulation Report. Oakland International Airport Master Plan Preparation Report. Revised: January 6, 2006

ARCHERFIELD AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL PAPER TP 03/10 RUNWAY CAPACITY

1.1.3 Taxiways. Figure 1-15: Taxiway Data. DRAFT Inventory TYPICAL PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION LIGHTING TYPE LENGTH (FEET) WIDTH (FEET) LIGHTING CONDITION

Raleigh-Durham International Airport Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan. August 1991

APPENDIX D MSP Airfield Simulation Analysis

Supplementary airfield projects assessment

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport Monthly Runway Use System Report. June 2015

Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport Monthly Runway Use System Report. June 2016

Chapter III - Demand/Capacity and Facility Requirements

Airport Master Plan for. Brown Field Municipal Airport PAC Meeting #3

Determining Airport Acceptance Rate (AAR) Mexico City Airport Case Study

Airport Master Plan for Montgomery-Gibbs Executive Airport PAC Meeting #3

Transportation Engineering -II Dr. Rajat Rastogi Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology - Roorkee

Airport Design-3 Geometric Design

Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update

Facility Requirements

Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction. MIT Lincoln Laboratory

1.0 Project Background Mission Statement and Goals Objectives of this Sustainable Master Plan

NATIONAL BUSINESS AVIATION ASSOCIATION (NBAA) CONVENTION

DEMAND/CAPACITY ANALYSIS St. Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport

Anchorage ARTCC Phraseology Guide. Clearance Delivery Operations

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

Defining and Managing capacities Brian Flynn, EUROCONTROL

Chapter 5 Facility Requirements

Airport Systems: Planning, Design, and Management

Chapter 3. Demand/Capacity & Facility Requirements

April 4, McKinney Airport Advisory Committee Airport Master Plan Update.

HKIA : OPERATIONS AND CAPACITY

CAUTION: WAKE TURBULENCE

Airport s Perspective of Traffic Growth and Demand Management CANSO APAC Conference 5-7 May 2014, Colombo, Sri Lanka

JUNEAU RUNWAY INCURSION MITIGATION (RIM) PROGRAM. April 10 th 2017

1. Background and Proposed Action

Nantucket Memorial Airport Commission. Master Plan Workshop. October 26, 2012

ACRP Project 03-17: Evaluating Airfield Capacity

Capacity Analysis and Facility Requirements

CHAPTER 5 - FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

3.1 Facility Requirements Overview Airfield Facility Requirements... 1

Regional Jets ,360 A319/ , , , ,780

Key Purpose & Need Issues

CHAPTER 4 DEMAND/CAPACITY ANALYSIS

Table of Contents. Master Plan March 2014 TOC i Spokane International Airport

PART 210 NOISE ABATEMENT AND RUNWAY PROCEDURES NOISE ABATEMENT AND PREFERENTIAL RUNWAY USE PROCEDURES

Analysis of Air Transportation Systems. Airport Capacity

[1] Gleim #: Source: AIM Para Learning Statement Code: PLT141

The pilot and airline operator s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options. Session 3 Presentation 1

Prepared By: Mead & Hunt, Inc Port Lansing Road Lansing, MI 48906

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

ICAO Standards. Airfield Information Signs. ICAO Annex 14, 4th Edition Aerodrome Design and Operations

STUDY WORK GROUP MEETING No. 3. November 29, 2016

Merritt Island Airport

DEPARTMENT: CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE / Name: CE2303/ Railway, Airport and Harbors Engineering 2 MARK QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Indianapolis International Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan

Facility Requirements

JUNEAU RUNWAY INCURSION MITIGATION (RIM) PROGRAM JANUARY 25, 2017

Airport Master Plan. Brookings Regional Airport. Runway Runway 17-35

CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

Study Committee Meeting. September 2015

APPENDIX X: RUNWAY LENGTH ANALYSIS

VIRTUAL AIR TRAFFIC SIMULATION NETWORK UNITED STATES DIVISION. SUBJ: Phoenix (PHX) Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) Standard Operating Procedures

DEPARTMENT: CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE / Name: CE2303/ Railway, Airport and Harbors Engineering

Chapter 5 Facility Requirements

ACRP Project Evaluating Airfield Capacity

Agenda: SASP SAC Meeting 3

LEYELOV I I ... ** L 8. I *~~~~~...i DATA PACKAGE IVM, 8~ AIRPORT IMPROVEMVENT TASK FORCE DELAY STUDIES

Reduced Surface Emissions through Airport Surface Movement Optimization. Prof. Hamsa Balakrishnan. Prof. R. John Hansman

BNA Master Plan Update Public Meeting No. 2

Mountain / Canyon Flying LLC TAILWHEEL ENDORSEMENT SYLLABUS

Planning Horizon Activity Levels Airfield Capacity and Delay Airport Physical Planning Criteria Airfield and Landside Facility Requirements

Analysis of ATM Performance during Equipment Outages

Landing on Slippery Runways. BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company. Copyright 2007 Boeing. All rights reserved.

Navigation - Runways. Chap 2, Nolan

Appendix 6.1: Hazard Worksheet

EN-024 A Simulation Study on a Method of Departure Taxi Scheduling at Haneda Airport

4. Demand/Capacity Assessment and Facility Requirements

INTRODUCTION. General

The pilot and airline operator s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options. Session 2 Presentation 2

Transcription:

Airport II- Airport. II-1 Definitions System capacity: Ability efficiently process the transported units. Aircrafts Passengers Baggage cargo Public access facilitation Runway Taxiway Gate Terminal Building Balanced Design Car parking b- Factors affecting R/W 1. Environmental Factors: Visibility: In poor visibility, longer separation & R/W occupancy time also under marginal crosswinds R/W will not be used. VFR vs. IFR Ceiling <= 1000 ft &OR Visibility <= 3 miles Runway Surface Condition: In wet/slippery R/W: longer deceleration & R/W occupancy time. In case of snow, the R/W should be closed. Winds: Strong Cross/tail Winds. Noise Abatement Requirements: Use could be restricted for some R/Ws during certain periods of the day. Dr. Eng. Omar Osman 1

2. ATC Factors: Regulations for min VL, HL & lateral separation (Operation Safety) Arrival Arrival 2~5 nautical mile depending on ACFT size (2 Arrivals) Arrival Departure Departure Arrival 2 nautical mile between Departure and following Arrival T3.1 Departure Departure 60~120 sec. depending on ACFT Size. Example: Landing speed= 165 mph Min Separation= 3 nmi = 3*6076=18228 ft = 18228/(165*5280/3600) = 75 sec. R/W Occupancy time = 25 sec. Sequencing ( FIFO, Speed-Class, Size,.) 3. Demand Characteristics: AC Size, Speed, Maneuverability, Braking Distance, and Pilot Technique Vortex Approach Speed Fast Approach Slow Approach Landing time R/W Occupancy Time -150 knot for Heavy ACFT -100 knot for Small ACFT Landing time (Touchdown Speed) Touch-and-go operations (landing then T/O without complete stop) = 2 operations one AC doing touch & go, can produce 16 mov./hr -i.e. 1 T/O, 14 T&G, 1L -Seldom under IFR Conditions % Arrivals (% Arrival + % Departure = 100%) AC mix A,B,C,D Mix Index= %C+3%D T3-2 Dr. Eng. Omar Osman 2

4. Design Factors R/Ws number, Spacing, Length, Orientation & Configuration T/Ws number, Locations and Exit Design Ramp Entrances Runway Use Strategy (Mixed mode vs. Segregated) 1. Single 2. Parallel 3. Open V 4. Intersecting F3-1 TO & landing TO or Landing Runway Configuration Dr. Eng. Omar Osman 3

C- and Delay Avg. Delay/AC Avg. Delay/AC Acceptable Delay Level (1~4 min) Ultimate Practical (op/hr) Demand (op/hr) IFR VFR Peak Demand (op/hr) * Operation at Ultimate capacity Increase Delay Reduce Airport Competitively (Low LOS) * Demand should not be more than practical capacity for so long (e.g. 30hrs/yr) Avg. AC Delay (min) Peaked Schdl Moderatly Schdl Uniform Schdl Demand / Ratio d- Determination 1. Preliminary R/W - for Planning Purposes -for Comparing Airports - Airport Appraisal - Comparing Passenger Demand with capacity (evaluation) See Table 3.3 (Config., MI, VFR/IFR) Hourly & Annual capacity (considering delay) ASV Check demand < ASV (otherwise too much delay & low LOS) Dr. Eng. Omar Osman 4

Preliminary Runway - % Arrivals = % Departure - Enough T/W - Touch & Go 0~5% Preliminary Runway - % Arrivals = % Departure - Enough T/W - Touch & Go 0~5% Dr. Eng. Omar Osman 5

d- Determination 2. Ultimate (Airport Handbook, FAA 62 Charts Doesn't consider delay) capacity C=Cb * E * T Basic Exit adj. factor Touch &go adj. factor -for Operation Control (ATC) -for Evaluation of Operation Techniques 3. Queuing Theory and Space-Time Concept Ultimate Dr. Eng. Omar Osman 6

Ultimate Ultimate Dr. Eng. Omar Osman 7

Apron Gate Services (Typical Ground Equipment Service Layout) Apron Gate Services Dr. Eng. Omar Osman 8

Apron Gate Services (Gate Occupancy Time) II-3 Apron Gate GateTime Supply GateTime Demand µ. N K and K.60 T. gi mi C i C = min ( C ) = C g gk gk g 2 For all aircraft class i than t can use only gate type k or bigger Where : µ N T C C K gi m i K gk g = Number of gates of type k or bigger. = Gate utilization factor for gate type k. = Avg.gate occupancy time for aircraft class i. = % of aircraft class i in aircraft mix. = Gate capacity limited by gate type k. = Gate capacity for airport. Dr. Eng. Omar Osman 9

II-4 Taxiway Usually runway capacity is more critical. II-5 Terminal Building Considerations Runway configuration & TB location See fig 3.6 Shortest taxiing distance (both L & T/O) Gate taxiing & TB concepts See fig 4.12 a-linear b-pier (Finger) c-satellite d-transporter e-combination of concepts. Dr. Eng. Omar Osman 10

Runway configuration & TB location Gate Types Dr. Eng. Omar Osman 11

Gate Types Dr. Eng. Omar Osman 12