Du Toit, Jessica. Ref: 13/2/12/3/1 ATTENTION: JESSICA DU TOIT. Madam. I refer to your below and the Final BAR for the proposed Saldanha ADZ.

Transcription

1 Du Toit, Jessica From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Doretha Kotze 19 June :44 AM Du Toit, Jessica Collaborate Mailbox RE: Release of Saldanha ADZ Final BAR for public comment Follow up Flagged Ref: 13/2/12/3/1 ATTENTION: JESSICA DU TOIT Madam I refer to your below and the Final BAR for the proposed Saldanha ADZ. The West Coast District Municipality is still concerned about the extent of the ADZ, but acknowledges that the phasing of prospective developments, based on the outcomes of monitoring, may be the only way to unlock the aquaculture potential of Saldanha Bay. It is recommended that the phased expansion, as set out on p 81 of the FBAR, be followed. The West Coast District Municipality furthermore commends the proposed establishment of the ADZ Management Committee and Consultative Forum and recommends that these be instituted immediately upon Environmental Authorisation. No further areas should be considered for aquaculture development once approval of the areas identified in Figure 5 (Post Mitigation ADZ areas p 80 of FBAR) is received. Regards D o r e t h a K o t z e Stads- en Streekbeplanner/Town and Regional Planner Weskus Distriksmunisipaliteit Langstraat 58 Long Street Posbus 242 PO Box MOORREESBURG 7310 Tel: West Coast District Municipality From: Du Toit, Jessica [mailto:jedutoit@srk.co.za] Sent: 23 May :52 PM 1

2 To: Reuther, Sue Subject: Release of Saldanha ADZ Final BAR for public comment Dear Madam/Sir, Our below refers. We noted that Figure 7 in the Executive Summary had not updated properly. Please find attached the corrected Executive Summary, which has also been uploaded to our website. Best regards, Jessica From: Du Toit, Jessica Sent: 18 May :39 To: Reuther, Sue <SReuther@srk.co.za> Subject: Release of Saldanha ADZ Final BAR for public comment Dear Madam/Sir Release of Final Basic Assessment Report for proposed Saldanha Aquaculture Development Zone (ADZ) for public review SRK Consulting (South Africa) Pty Ltd (SRK) was appointed by the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF) to undertake the Basic Assessment (BA) process required in terms of the National Environmental Management Act (Act 107 of 1998), as amended (NEMA) and the EIA Regulations, 2014, as amended, for a sea-based ADZ in Saldanha Bay, comprising of several precincts. The BA Report was made available for public comment for an extended public comment period from 8 February to 31 March In response to the approximately 60 submissions and petitions received on the BA Report, the report was updated. A comprehensive Comments and Responses table is provided in BAR Appendix E10. The Final BA Report is now being released for public comment until 19 June Please find attached the Executive Summary. The full documentation can also be downloaded from SRK s website at Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned should you have any queries or require additional information. Regards, Jessica du Toit BSc (ConsEcol), MPhil (Env Mgmt) Environmental Consultant SRK Consulting (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd The Administrative Building, Albion Spring, 183 Main Road, Rondebosch, 7700 Postnet Suite # 206, Private Bag X18, Rondebosch, 7701 Tel: +27-(0) ; Fax: +27-(0) Mobile: + 27-(0) ; Direct: +27-(0) jedutoit@srk.co.za This transmission is intended for the sole use of the addressee, and may contain information that by its privileged and confidential nature is exempt from disclosure under applicable law. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or duplication of this transmission by someone other than the intended recipient or its designated agent is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this transmission, or by collect call to the above phone number. Please consider the environment before printing this . 2

3 Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more Click Here. 3

4

5

6

7

8 SALDAN HMtY MUNISIPALITEIT I MUNICIPALITY I umasipala REF NO: 12/1/2/71 ENQUIRIES: N. Duarte, Ms DEARef: 14/12/1613/3/ Ms Sue Reuther REGISTERED MAIL SRK Consulting (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd Postnet Suite #206 Private Bag Xl 8 Rondebosch 7701 sreuther@srk.co.za Dear Madam RE: PROPOSED SEA-BASED SALDANHA BAY: FINAL BASIC AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT ZONE IN ASSESSMENT REPORT I. The Proposed Sea-Based Aquaculture Development Zone in Saldanha Bay: Final Basic Assessment Report dated May 2017 has reference. 2. Visual Impact Assessment Figure 3-I: Layout of Saldanha ADZ does not coincide with the mitigated map. 3. Currently, there are bay users which monitors and removes washout and debris on the beaches (existing aquaculture farms and Sea Harvest), should this application receive a positive authorisation, the responsibility can be shared between users. T: (022) F: (022) mun@sbm.gov.za Private Bag X12 Vredenburg 7380

9 4. Please define which effluent is volumes of effluent that are referred to discharged......especially in respect of the large 5. Specific mention is not made about the consequences comply and which gives no indication for compliance. for operators who do not 6. Some of the the EAP comments are condones discrimination. discriminatory and should not be responded to, unless 7. The committee responders if should include anglers(fishermen as there should be escapes. those would be the first 8. Persons attending and of fairly high ranking high. the committee to on behalf of government maintain continuity as staff turnover should be in consistent government is 9. Specific mention is not made of ADZ, e.g oil spills, boats and equipment other as in some instances e.g water users, which may negatively impact on sporting activities causing damage water sporting upon, yet they also have an impact on regular beach goers. the to activities may be impacted 10. The need for an aquacufture veterinarian is EMPr. There may however, impact on all users of the not be that impact requiring an aquaculture veterinarian, expressed numerous times in the type of skill in this area. This will have an bay. How will this be mitigated and how long before an becomes catastrophic? pp ACTING MUNICIPAL MANAGER Date:

10 Tel: Our Ref: 16/1/4 ADZ BAR SaldBay 19 June 2017 Via SRK Consulting Postnet Suite 3206 Private Bag X18 Rondebosch 7701 Attention: Sue Reuther / Jessica du Toit Dear Madam, Re: PROPOSED SALDANHA BAY AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT ZONE FINAL BASIC ASSESSMENT (DEA Project Number: 14/12/16/3/3/1/1728; SRK Ref nr: ) South African National Parks (SANParks) has assessed the above mentioned Final Basic Assessment Report (FBAR). As part of Operation Phakisa, SANParks supports the key priorities thereof and the associated principles and strategies. In light of this, SANParks wishes to make the following comments on the Final Basic Assessment: 1. Proximity of proposed ADZ to declared MPAs As stated in our comments on the Draft BAR, SANParks manages the Langebaan Lagoon Marine Protected Area (MPA) as well as the three island MPA s in the Saldanha Bay around the islands Malgas, Marcus and Jutten, with the islands being home to important, vulnerable and endangered seabird breeding colonies. With reference to SANParks comments on the Draft BAR, we note in the Final BAR the provision of a buffer area and setback of 1km of the proposed ADZ area from the outer edge of the Malgas Island MPA. However, the 250m buffer onto Jutten Island and point AF hard onto the MPA of Jutten Island, which we opposed in our Draft BAR comments, have not been amended. The buffer area to the island MPAs should be consistently applied. The rationale for different buffer distances is unclear: A 1km buffer is provided on to the Malgas Island MPA for an ADZ area, where indigenous fish species will be cultured, but only a 250m buffer (from the island itself, not even the MPA), is suggested onto Jutten Island for an ADZ area, where alien fish species will be cultured.

11 Page 2 of 2 To rectify the inconsistency, a 1km buffer should be applied to the outer edge of the Jutten Island MPA boundary, not the island itself, to align with the 1km setback from the Malgas Island MPA. The application of a 1km buffer to the Jutten Island MPA should be instated given that: - The risk for disease, etc. is much larger given it is an alien species that will be cultured near Jutten Island MPA; - The risk to protected bird species, with this proximity of an ADZ area, is much larger; - The risk of seal predation, due to the colony on the island, with this proximity is much larger and - The lack of a buffer restricts SANParks access to the island and general ability to enter and patrol the boundary of our MPA. 2. Need for undertaking specialist studies upfront SANParks motivated in our comments on the Draft BAR and wish to highlight again the need to undertake more detailed scoping studies upfront, such as site-specific modelling, to determine water movement, the exchange of water into the lagoon and bay areas, to establish impacts on water quality in relation to number of cages, carrying capacity of different areas, potential dead zones, etc. and analyse dissolved oxygen and other nutrient levels (see our March 2017 comments). The undertaking of a Risk Benefit Analysis during this BAR process should also be favourably considered in this context. SANParks is of the opinion that addressing these aspects would be beneficial to the EA process in providing more accurate, evidence-based information for decision making and effective implementation of the ADZ. SANParks reserves the right to request further information, to revise initial comments and to make additional comments on any additional information that may be received. Yours sincerely, Dr Ané Oosthuizen National Marine Co-ordinator Park Planning & Development South African National Parks CC. M van der Westhuizen, P. Bopape, P Nel.

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23 Reuther, Sue From: William Joshua Sent: 18 May :59 To: Reuther, Sue Subject: Registration on SRK Project # , Saldanha ADZ database Good Day Sue I wish to register as a interested party for the Saldanha Bay ADZ (project number : ) I represent a consortium of companies that provide the following services 1. Business services - business coaching, mentoring, business strategy development and implementation, financial management & bookkeeping / accounting, business plans and funding applications, 2. Health, safety and environmental services 3. Solar installations, electricity storage, backup power, energy efficiency and usage monitoring and reporting 4. Custom Computer software development 5. Enterprise development beneficiary development 6. Environmental condition monitoring and reporting (example, temp, humidity, energy consumption, water levels, chemical composition and changes in chemical composition) 7. Community engagement programs 8. Community owned waste recycling facilities We wish to register our services on the supplier database and be informed of any business opportunities related to this project. Additional I would also like to understand how to register and what the requirements are to operate a facility or sea farm in the Saldanha ADZ. Thank you for any assistance you can provide in this regard. William Joshua

24 Du Toit, Jessica From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Glen & Lesley Ford 21 May :53 PM Du Toit, Jessica OBJECTION TO FISH FARMING IN LANGEBAAN LAGOON Follow up Completed We would like to register our objection to the proposed fish farming in Langebaan Lagoon It is already affecting fishing and fish species - lice etc Please register our objection...it will kill the dolphins and all normal fishing Kind regards, Glen and Lesley Ford 1

25

26 Du Toit, Jessica From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Hannes van Zyl 18 May :54 AM Du Toit, Jessica RE: Release of Saldanha ADZ Final BAR for public comment Follow up Flagged Reg so, het julle pos ontvang. Natuurlik is julle verslag geskryf om goedkeuring te verseker vir die Ontwikkelaars. Ek sien meeste van die waarderings in die in die ROOI. Die uiteinde sal net wees met soordgelyke gevolge soos die van: Die keer-wal, die olie/erts terminal, die smelter en bestaande see-plase in die baai. Dankie, JJ van Zyl From: Du Toit, Jessica Sent: Thursday, May 18, :39 AM To: Reuther, Sue Subject: Release of Saldanha ADZ Final BAR for public comment Dear Madam/Sir Release of Final Basic Assessment Report for proposed Saldanha Aquaculture Development Zone (ADZ) for public review SRK Consulting (South Africa) Pty Ltd (SRK) was appointed by the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF) to undertake the Basic Assessment (BA) process required in terms of the National Environmental Management Act (Act 107 of 1998), as amended (NEMA) and the EIA Regulations, 2014, as amended, for a sea-based ADZ in Saldanha Bay, comprising of several precincts. The BA Report was made available for public comment for an extended public comment period from 8 February to 31 March In response to the approximately 60 submissions and petitions received on the BA Report, the report was updated. A comprehensive Comments and Responses table is provided in BAR Appendix E10. The Final BA Report is now being released for public comment until 19 June Please find attached the Executive Summary. The full documentation can also be downloaded from SRK s website at Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned should you have any queries or require additional information. Regards, Jessica du Toit BSc (ConsEcol), MPhil (Env Mgmt) Environmental Consultant 1

27 Reuther, Sue From: Johann Hanekom Sent: 01 June :48 To: Reuther, Sue Subject: RE: Release of Saldanha ADZ Final BAR for public comment Dear Sue Thanks for your feedback of which I take note. I do not understand why parties would put the economic existence and the whole being of the lagoon area and the surrounding Langebaan and Saldanha at risk. It makes no sense at all unfortunately. Kind regards Johann Hanekom Tel From: Reuther, Sue [mailto:sreuther@srk.co.za] Sent: 25 May :37 PM To: Johann Hanekom <johann.hanekom@absamail.co.za> Cc: Du Toit, Jessica <JeDuToit@srk.co.za> Subject: RE: Release of Saldanha ADZ Final BAR for public comment Thank you for the comment Johann. I wanted to make a couple of notes on the two aspects you raise, with the hope of providing some additional clarification: Potential revenue and employment opportunities are provided in the socio economic impact assessment in Appendix F (for the full production extent, which may not be achieved, as noted in the report). In terms of the downside costs, great efforts have been made to avoid spatial overlap with other existing activities in the bay and to include ecological and visual buffers to minimise impacts. The phased implementation and simultaneous is further intended to gradually expand aquaculture, with a clear emphasis on stopping expansion at the point where monitoring results indicate that threshold levels may be reached. The ADZ is, to a large extent, made up of existing unused areas (I assume you are referring to the leases already allocated by Transnet, but not used), and in fact excludes some of these lease areas where they were deemed to be located in undesirable areas (too close to MPAs etc) see map below, which shows the original ADZ without buffers etc, but including existing allocations in pink and yellow. Some of the new ADZ area is made up of the areas located within allocated leases, plus some additional areas deemed potentially suitable, mostly in Outer Bay North and South (as Big Bay South has been excluded). One of DAFF s objectives with the ADZ is to enable operators to take up farming in these existing unused areas, without having to undertake individual EIA processes for each. 1

28 Best regards, Sue From: Du Toit, Jessica Sent: 25 May :41 To: Johann Hanekom Cc: Reuther, Sue Subject: RE: Release of Saldanha ADZ Final BAR for public comment Dear Johann Thank you for your . Your comments have been received and recorded. Kind regards Jessica From: Johann Hanekom Sent: 24 May :59 AM To: Du Toit, Jessica Subject: RE: Release of Saldanha ADZ Final BAR for public comment Importance: High Morning Jessica Trust to find you well and thank you for the report. 2

29 I am pleased that it has been scaled down but I am still of the opinion that it does not make any economic sense. It would be interesting if rand values could be added to the positive and negative aspects in order to evaluate the business potential of this proposed venture. I strongly advise that the existing unused areas first be properly utilized before any thought is given to proposed new areas. It would be rather foolish to invest into such a venture which, according to the supplied data, will have serious negative impact on the existing environment and economy. Nothing in the supplied information indicate that this project will have a positive effect on the community in totality. It only shows that the given environment can accommodate such an aquaculture area which does not imply that it should be undertaken. Again this makes no business sense and I strongly oppose it. Kind regards Johann Hanekom Tel From: Du Toit, Jessica [mailto:jedutoit@srk.co.za] Sent: 23 May :56 PM To: Reuther, Sue <SReuther@srk.co.za> Subject: Release of Saldanha ADZ Final BAR for public comment Dear Madam/Sir, Our below refers. We noted that Figure 7 in the Executive Summary had not updated properly. Please find attached the corrected Executive Summary, which has also been uploaded to our website. Best regards, Jessica From: Du Toit, Jessica Sent: 18 May :39 To: Reuther, Sue <SReuther@srk.co.za> Subject: Release of Saldanha ADZ Final BAR for public comment Dear Madam/Sir Release of Final Basic Assessment Report for proposed Saldanha Aquaculture Development Zone (ADZ) for public review SRK Consulting (South Africa) Pty Ltd (SRK) was appointed by the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF) to undertake the Basic Assessment (BA) process required in terms of the National Environmental Management Act (Act 107 of 1998), as amended (NEMA) and the EIA Regulations, 2014, as amended, for a sea-based ADZ in Saldanha Bay, comprising of several precincts. The BA Report was made available for public comment for an extended public comment period from 8 February to 31 March In response to the approximately 60 submissions and petitions received on the BA Report, the report was updated. A comprehensive Comments and Responses table is provided in BAR Appendix E10. 3

30 The Final BA Report is now being released for public comment until 19 June Please find attached the Executive Summary. The full documentation can also be downloaded from SRK s website at Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned should you have any queries or require additional information. Regards, Jessica du Toit BSc (ConsEcol), MPhil (Env Mgmt) Environmental Consultant SRK Consulting (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd The Administrative Building, Albion Spring, 183 Main Road, Rondebosch, 7700 Postnet Suite # 206, Private Bag X18, Rondebosch, 7701 Tel: +27 (0) ; Fax: +27 (0) Mobile: + 27 (0) ; Direct: +27 (0) jedutoit@srk.co.za This transmission is intended for the sole use of the addressee, and may contain information that by its privileged and confidential nature is exempt from disclosure under applicable law. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or duplication of this transmission by someone other than the intended recipient or its designated agent is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this transmission, or by collect call to the above phone number. Please consider the environment before printing this e mail. 4

31 From, Keith Harrison, Conservation. P.O. Box 1404, Tel, Vredenburg, , To, Jessica du Toit SRK Consulting (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd. Postnet Suite # 206, . jedutoit@srk.co.za Private Bag X18, Rondebosch th. May Ref: Release of Saldanha ADZ final BAR. Dear Jessica du Toit, Thank you for sending to me the Saldanha ADZ final BAR and an opportunity to comment. Marine Ecology Specialist Study, Birds. The comment includes the importance of the breeding islands but omits any specialist use during the remainder of the year. After their breeding season all the Cape Cormorants in the Benguela System gather at an epicentre and form rafts to carry out their post breeding moult, this year it was again Big Bay and probably consisted of 250,000 birds. They hunt the whole system especially North Bay driving small fish into a bait ball in shallow water, which can be observed from the ridge in the Military area leading to Marcus Island. A feeding frenzy will drive the fish into the fin fish cages and the Cape Cormorants swimming down for prey will become entangled in the nets. Also diving into these feeding frenzies are Cape Gannets, Swift Terns and summer migrant terns Common and Sandwich. In the winter Antarctic Terns are in North Bay to feed. A recent video taken by another applicant showing the bottom under a cage and the bethnic fauna which has developed indicates that many small crayfish are attracted to the detritis, these are the prey of Bank Cormorants which have small breeding colonies on Marcus and Malgas islands. These birds could dive under the net and become entangled. Bank

32 Cormorant numbers are reducing and there is concern for the species. Bank Cormorants are classed as Globally Threatened with only 65 breeding pairs in the area. The West Coast Bird Club objects to the deployment of fin fish cages in the Saldanha Bays and around the Islands. Keith Harrison Conservation. Keith Harrison Conservation.

33 BirdLife South Africa is a partner of BirdLife International, a global partnership of nature conservation organisations. Member of IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). Reg No: NPO PBO Exemption No: Attn: Jessica du Toit SRK Consulting Re: Proposed Sea-Based Aquaculture Development Zone in Saldanha Bay Final Basic Assessment Report 5 July 2017 Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the final BAR. The responses to the comments provided on the draft BAR and additional research that we have conducted have allayed many of the concerns raised. While we still have concerns, we are not opposed to the establishment of the ADZ, provided the following issues are taken into account: All aquaculture operations must become certified by the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) by following the relevant guidelines for the species concerned. These guidelines must be built into the Environmental Management Plans. DAFF should consider measures that can be taken if farms don t achieve ASC certification. For salmonid species, we would like to highlight the following important criteria for certification (although there are others in the guidelines which should also be taken into account): o Benthic biodiversity and benthic effects: Frequent monitoring of the benthic environment (sulphide levels and redox potential, macrofaunal assessments) directly below the finfish cages compared to a control/reference point at regular intervals. o Water Quality: Weekly measures of dissolved oxygen and comparison of nitrogen and phosphorus levels to a control site. o Interactions with wildlife, including predators: No lethal interactions with Endangered or Red Listed seabirds or marine mammals and fewer than 9 lethal interactions per year. o Use of wild fish in feed: There are suitable alternative feeds that avoid using wild fish. These alternatives should be investigated. o Managing of disease and parasites in a responsible manner o Community engagement Phased implementation of the ADZ, with strict monitoring protocols in place to ensure no major negative environmental impacts occur before additional farms are authorized. Plans should be put in place by DAFF, DEA and other relevant authorities to govern the steps taken should negative environmental impacts occur. o A factor that should be taken into account is that as the area of farms increases, this may decrease the feeding area available to seabirds and other predators.

34 Water quality and benthic monitoring data, and all seabird and marine mammal observations/interactions recorded should be made publically available in a single (possibly internet-based) database at all phases of implementation. All potential farming companies should collaborate with the Saldanha Bay Water Quality Forum Trust. Suitable net materials should be used with appropriate anti-predator netting. The mesh size should be sufficient to prevent seabird entanglements. Regular inspection of the nets and removal of any dead fish, as this will reduce the potential interactions between predatory fish and seals and the cages. There have been reports elsewhere in the world of smaller fish being attracted to the outside of cages, which then attract other predators. This should be monitored and if adverse interactions occur, plans should be put in place to mitigate this impact. At all times the sensitive nature of the marine environment must be taken into account. Saldanha Bay and Langebaan Lagoon are ecologically important areas and contain several marine protected areas, an international Important Bird and Biodiversity Area and a Ramsar site. The three islands in the bay Jutten, Malgas and Marcus - are important breeding areas for 11 species of seabirds (three of which are Endangered, and one Vulnerable) and host nearly seabirds. The lagoon is an important breeding and spawning area for commercially important fish species. Kind regards Christina Hagen Pamela Isdell Fellow of Penguin Conservation, BirdLife South Africa

35 Du Toit, Jessica From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: John Van Der Vyver (MEA) 18 June :32 PM Du Toit, Jessica; Inge Frost; Peter Lindenberg Re: please register us as an I&AP for the Saldanha Aquaculture project Follow up Flagged Dear Ms Du Toit, Reuters and other official parties. Nearly a year ago I registered as an I&AP in this matter. I primarily listed 6 categories of both objection and no viability of the project ass jeopardizing existing water tourism revenues, existing long standing rights in these water and water safety. (these are listed below) 1. I would like to re register and re affirm these points. Both in that I believe they need to read with and considered in this matter but also based on my experience, deep knowledge of the area of more than 40 years in the water there and 20 years in sustainable business in the area, I believe are very relevant to the arriving at a balanced and correct decision. 2. I would also like to highlight that over the last 10 months, many of these issues raised have proved both relevant and mutually exclusive to a safe and viable project : We have had recent storms and significant infrastructure has broken free and floated un marked over the lagoon waters. Craft and water users hitting this both risk material and personal safety and risk of injury. The pilot or evaluation farm is liable for this and any consequential damage, but in reality can t manage this effectively and will accelerate over time as gear wears out. In short this both impinges on existing rights and any significant accident, physical injury/death or damage to property will be laid at the aqua farm as rightly or wrongly basic negligence. This point was high lighted and has now been proven. The recent down wind dash saw very high winds and significant equipment had to be abandoned as rescuers could not reach participants by virtue of the in water structures. In the Mykonos yacht race several yachts sailed into unmarked and unlit infrastructure as they approached the finish near Club Mykonos. The other factors that we should not loose sight of : 1. We have never had a major shark attack in the area. 2. Fish farms change both the time sharks hang around but also their nature and they become more opportunistic. With an apex predator this has a very increased risk to water users. We have seen 2 major cases round the world backed up by marine biologists which ascribe the increased shark presence and change in behavior/aggression to fish farms. A similar analogy is cage diving where this practice and attracting sharks to boats and people have changed sharks behavior and attitude to people and boats. 3. Should an attack happen it would danger tourism materially, look at Reunion island and other venues where it takes years for tourists to return and feel safe to enjoy the waters again. Another issue is the feeding of fish and non indigenous fish can result in : Changing the water balance with increased new foreign food forms and matter. Note I believe some of the non indigenous fish are considered more viable 1

36 Can I please ask these points raised and registered be considered carefully. Should the evaluating authority or board wish to discuss this further I would make myself available at their request. We all want jobs, economic progress etc, however green tourism is the only sustainable material asset this region has, please don t risk so much for such a much smaller consequential potential gain, Yours sincerely John van der Vyver Ref From: "John Van Der Vyver (MEA)" <John.vanderVyver@za.didata.com> Date: Thursday 11 August 2016 at 1:18 PM To: "jedutoit@srk.co.za" <jedutoit@srk.co.za>, "sreuthers@srk.co.za" <sreuthers@srk.co.za> Cc: "chairman@vlife.co.za" <chairman@vlife.co.za>, "Hennie com>" <henniebredenkamp@gmail.com>, "colin@hobiecape.co.za" <colin@hobiecape.co.za>, Simon Russell <simon.w.russell@accenture.com>, Jaco Kotze <info@villaverano.co.za>, Andre Kruger <walkingonwaterlangebaan@gmail.com>, Pierre Nel <pierre.nel@sanparks.org>, Rob Lundie <rob@avignoncapital.com>, "Robbie org>" <robbie@windsurfingafrica.org> Subject: please register us as an I&AP for the Saldanha Aquaculture project Dear Ms du Toit and Ms Reuthers Please register me as an I&AP for this project. Here are the our details: 1. John van der Vyver, ID , Langebaan property owner 2. Friday Island (PTY) LTD, tourism based accommodation and restaurant business, focussing on kitesurfing, SUP, windsurfing, hobie sailing and water sports, where water sport tourism is Langebaan s biggest summer income stream. 3. Langebaan Kitesurfing Guild, organisation responsible for managing kitesurfing in Langebaan and its facilitation and interaction with other water users and stakeholders. 4. Race Director Langebaan Downwind Dash In addition to Registration as an I&AP : 1. Please provide an overview of the public participation process to date, based on knowledgable and experienced parties who can comment with respected subject matter knowledge on the wider effect of this proposed project to all Water users, stakeholders, their safety and also the ability of this project to not jeopardise, damage and erode current income, jobs, rights and enjoyment these users have. Note the effect on tourism income could easily erode more than this project seeks to gain for the community. 2

37 2. The proposed venue is a world class venue that hosts many annual sailing regattas for Hobie Cats, dingies and Keel Boats. Many Nationals and world championships have been held here, this project will wipe this entire venue out as a world acclaimed sailing venue of choice. These areas also present great dangers for sail boats at day and night and how they currently navigate the lagoon. These areas also sprawl as they have in Saldanha and many people have been badly hurt sailing into these areas which are badly marked, not accurately on charts or don t provide reasonable course of sail as weather and wind change daily. 3. The Langebaan Downwind Dash, the longest running windsurfing, kiting and sailing event since 1984, featuring windsurfers, kitesurfers, hobie cats and SUPs racing from Langebaan to Saldanha over 22km crosses this proposed areas several times. This event draws 100s of competitors, is featured in magazines, TV and social media and greatly boosts Langebaan area for tourism. The current facility in Saldanha needs to be managed tighter as any unmarked areas, broken off areas has caused previous physical damage to competitors previously. Increased areas are not an option for a safe race and the consequential liability to the people doing this farming starts to be a serious factor. We also need to ensure that the current facility in Saldanha carries sufficient 3rd party insurance, this if for facility, any unmarked areas and any equipment that breaks free and can be readily identified as sea farming equipment. 4. Paddling and SUP, this area is used several times a week for the paddles from Langebaan Yacht Club and the Langebaan SUP forum, have these organisations been polled and considered for input. 5. Farming in access zones to the mouth is dangerous to all sailing and access routes as in rougher weather conditions many vessels approach from the south inside Jutten island, fouling or being stuck is dangerous. 6. In these initiatives equipment often breaks loose in storms, this drifts unmarked in the water, many water users move at high speeds, kiting and windsurfing, hitting this at speed is very dangerous. This aside Langebaan has a very large industry teaching kite surfing, windsurfing and sailing, where learners and inter mediate ability students can get blown down to these areas, panic and incur serious injury or worse. One bad injury or drowning would damage langebaan tourism and these industries hugely. This aside I feel this initiative needs to be viewed and commented by all related and effected parties objectively : This is private enterprise in public space, the area needs commercial assistance, jobs and food, it just has to be done in a responsible manner and in areas that don t impact current water users and established routes. The relevant informed and knowledgable parties need to be engaged, Langebaan Yacht Club, Langebaan Kitesurfing Guild, Windsurfing SA, SAKA, Hobie SA and SAS, Langebaan paddling and SUP club,nsri, Mykonos harbour, Saldanha Bay Yacht Club. Tourism and Municipality current initiatives and future objectives need to be discussed and managed, ie we can t jeopardise the little we have in a hope to get more. Langebaan Ratepayers where the greater consensus and good of the town can be managed and balanced, Sanparks need to be consulted and their input respected. Yours Sincerely John van der Vyver This and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer: " 3

38 Du Toit, Jessica From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: andrew maclachlan 19 June :30 PM Du Toit, Jessica Sea based Aquaculture Developement Zone - Saldanha. North Bay Farm Sites reserved-7 (2)-6.docx Good day Jessica. Your final published BAR document on the Saldanha ADZ refers. The following important comments for incorporation in your document: 1) North Bay - Fin Fish Farming Our company ( Southern Atlantic Sea Farms) experimented with fin fish farming in North Bay during 2014/15 and can confirm that Fin fish farming in the North Bay area is not viable because: A) Very low Dissolved Oxygen levels makes fish farming impossible ( to risky / never economically viable) B) The Southern area off North Bay is earmarked for Fin fish and/or shell fish and will most likely be more suitable for shell fish culture 2) North Bay - Mussel Farming - Farm sites. Please note the following: A) Several farm areas were allocated by Transnet in the North Bay area even before the ADZ processes started and several of these farms had confirmed legal Leases before the ADZ process started. B) Current and future Farm sites were surveyed to the satisfaction of Transnet and some applicants have Leases in process to be issued based on this agreed survey and positions. C) Some Farms sites are in the area proposed as a buffer zone around the Marine Protected Area and was allocated as such being outside the MPA. D) These farms were given "authorisation" by DEA provincial based on the fact that they were outside the MPA. E) The attached google image indicates this scenario that needs to be addressed. 3) North Bay - Buffer Zone for Mussel farming. A) Having been in this area, actively involved in commercial Fishing, Aquaculture and working for the Department of Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries ( at the time the Department of Sea Fisheries) servicing the Islands since 1972, I can confirm that their is a factually faulty perception on where the nursery area is for young gannets at Malgas Island. The young birds learns to swim in the area between the Island and the mainland ( North of Malgas Island) and to the West of the Rocky Area known as the "Needles" and not in the area where the proposed Buffer Zone is requested. Further to the above, I have never witnessed a gannet diving into objects floating in the water in my entire career and certainly never into mussel lines. I have witnessed several thousand young gannets taken by seals waiting for them on their first swimming/diving attempt in the area indicated above. 4) North Bay - carrying capacity for mussels. A) The suggested carrying capacity for Saldanha as per the BAR is +- 8kg/ meter of mussel rope( droppers/raft/hectare kg /hectare/ (800 dropper of 6meter each = 4800 meter : kg/4800 meter= 8.33kg/meter). In the historical mussel farming area of Saldanha mussel droppers is +- 6 meter long. 1

39 B) The above is also determined by depth of water column, current ( food supply& flushing). The deeper areas of Saldanha (Outer Bay 12 meter and North Bay 20 meter) will have significantly higher capacity with even lessor impact because of the flushing potential of these areas. Mussel Farming in the Outer Bay area from mid 1980's to mid 1990's clearly proofed no impact with 40% higher carrying capacity. 5) Sea weed culture - Saldanha Bay A) Gracalaria has been recorded in Inner Bay and the Langebaan Lagoon since 1943 and has clearly been a resident specie in the Bay and lagoon for more than 70 years. B) Other species that should be farmed and included in the list of species in your document is Macrocystis and Laminaria pallida as these species has been proven to do well in Saldanha Bay but remains localised ( not spreading around easily) 6) Resident Local Fish species and the effect of Aquaculture A) It is very important to note that the Bio Mass of White Stumpnose has been at the highest ever recorded levels between mid 1980's to mid 1990's when Mussel Farms were active in the Outer Bay. B) The mussel farms provided a permanent and continuous "easy" feeding area for White Stumpnose with smaller size mussels on the mussel lines and creating ideal conditions for White Stumpnose. Regards Andrew Maclachlan Tel:

40 North Bay Farm Sites

41 Southern Atlantic Seafarms and Southern Cross New Sites

42 Coordinate list.

43 SPARE SITE ( 15 Hectare) Sas1 Sas2 Sas3 Sas 'S, 'E 'S, 'E 'S, 'E 'S, 'E SOUTHERN ATLANTIC SEA FARMS (1) ( 15 Hectare) Port Net Positions Sas 'S, 'E S E Sas 'S, 'E S E Sas 'S, 'E S E Sas 'S, 'E S E 456x336m X2 SOUTHERN CROSS ( 20 hectare) Sc1 Sc2 Sc3 Sc4 Sc5 Sc6 Sc7 Sc 'S, 'E 'S, 'E 'S, 'E 'S, 'E 'S, 'E 'S, 'E 'S, 'E 'S, 'E 695x300m This includes a 20 m servitude between north and south lines XESIBE AQUACULTURE (15 hectare)

44 A1 A2 A3 A 'S, 'E 'S, 'E 'S, 'E 'S, 'E 456x336 Spare site ( FE) ( 30 hectare) B1 B2 B3 B 'S, 'E 'S, 'E 'S, 'E 'S, 'E 450x695 This includes a 20 meter Servitude between north and south lines. SOUTHERN ATLANTIC SEA FARMS ( 2 ND 15 HECTARE) Port Net positions C 'S, 'E S E C 'S, 'E S E C 'S, 'E S E C 'S, 'E S E 336x456m REQUA ENTERPRISES ( 15 hectare) Port net positions D 'S, 'E S E D 'S, 'E S E D 'S, 'E S E D 'S, 'E S E 336x456m

45 CHAPMANS AQUACULTURE (15 hectare) Port Net positions E 'S, 'E S E E 'S, 'E S E E 'S, 'E S E E 'S, 'E S x456m Venia F1 F2 F3 F 'S, 'E 'S, 'E 'S, 'E 'S, 'E 336x456m

46 Du Toit, Jessica From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Jeremy Fairbairn 19 June :21 AM Du Toit, Jessica Reuther, Sue FW: 5173 Release of Saldanha ADZ Final BAR for public comment _Saldanha ADZ BAR_Executive Summary_CORRECTED FIG 7.pdf Follow up Flagged Hi Jessica, Find immediately below, public comment: I understand the economics behind it (the aquaculture farming) but the issue is the location of the aquaculture farming and the biggest chunk at that (See figure 7 Big Bay North), right in front of Paradise Beach, 1km in. Whilst the document provides an alternative site, it is just a distraction i.e. for the mind to jump between the two alternatives proposed. Let s not fall for that. Big Bay North s allocation is biased and should, in fact must, be divided amongst the other existing precincts which are naturally sheltered and have minimal impact on high traffic tourist and residents pleasure activity areas. Consequently this biased allocation is seriously challenged. Further to this, it has also become necessary to consider migrating aquaculture farming precincts / alternative sites for aquaculture farming further up the more uninhabited / less popular areas of the West Coast line. Regards, Jeremy Fairbairn From: Jeremy Fairbairn [mailto:fairbaj@telkomsa.net] Sent: 23 May :35 PM To: 'Suzanne Keet' Cc: 'jedutoit@srk.co.za' Subject: 5173 Release of Saldanha ADZ Final BAR for public comment Hi Suzanne, The attached has reference. [Edited]. I understand the economics behind it but it is the location of the aquaculture farming and the biggest chunk at that (See figure 7 Big Bay North), right in front of Paradise Beach, 1km in. Whilst the document provides an alternative site, it is just a distraction for the mind to jump between the two alternatives proposed... [Edited]. Big Bay North s allocation is biased [Edited] and should, in fact must, be divided amongst the other precincts which are naturally sheltered and have minimal impact on high traffic tourist and residents pleasure activity areas. Consequently this biased allocation must be seriously challenged. Further to this it has also become necessary to consider migrating precincts further up the west coast line. [Edited]. Regards, Jeremy Fairbairn 1

47 From: Du Toit, Jessica Sent: 23 May :56 PM To: Reuther, Sue Subject: Release of Saldanha ADZ Final BAR for public comment Dear Madam/Sir, Our below refers. We noted that Figure 7 in the Executive Summary had not updated properly. Please find attached the corrected Executive Summary, which has also been uploaded to our website. Best regards, Jessica From: Du Toit, Jessica Sent: 18 May :39 To: Reuther, Sue <SReuther@srk.co.za> Subject: Release of Saldanha ADZ Final BAR for public comment Dear Madam/Sir Release of Final Basic Assessment Report for proposed Saldanha Aquaculture Development Zone (ADZ) for public review SRK Consulting (South Africa) Pty Ltd (SRK) was appointed by the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF) to undertake the Basic Assessment (BA) process required in terms of the National Environmental Management Act (Act 107 of 1998), as amended (NEMA) and the EIA Regulations, 2014, as amended, for a sea-based ADZ in Saldanha Bay, comprising of several precincts. The BA Report was made available for public comment for an extended public comment period from 8 February to 31 March In response to the approximately 60 submissions and petitions received on the BA Report, the report was updated. A comprehensive Comments and Responses table is provided in BAR Appendix E10. The Final BA Report is now being released for public comment until 19 June Please find attached the Executive Summary. The full documentation can also be downloaded from SRK s website at Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned should you have any queries or require additional information. Regards, Jessica du Toit BSc (ConsEcol), MPhil (Env Mgmt) Environmental Consultant SRK Consulting (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd The Administrative Building, Albion Spring, 183 Main Road, Rondebosch, 7700 Postnet Suite # 206, Private Bag X18, Rondebosch, 7701 Tel: +27-(0) ; Fax: +27-(0) Mobile: + 27-(0) ; Direct: +27-(0) jedutoit@srk.co.za This transmission is intended for the sole use of the addressee, and may contain information that by its privileged and confidential nature is exempt from disclosure under applicable law. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or duplication of this transmission by someone other than the intended recipient or its designated agent is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this transmission, or by collect call to the above phone number. 2

48 1 Postnet Suite 7 Private Bag X6 Langebaan th June 2017 SRK Consulting Postnet Suite #206 Private Bag X18 Rondebosch 7701 Attention: Jessica du Toit LETTER OF OBJECTION RE: FINAL BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT - PROPOSED SEA-BASED AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT ZONE IN SALDANHA BAY - SRK Project Number: DEA Project Number: 14/12/16/3/3/1/1728 This Letter of Objection is submitted without prejudice. We, the membership of the Save Langebaan Lagoon Action Group (SLL), representing over 1000 Langebaan residents, hereby lodge our outright objection to the proposal for an aquaculture development zone in the areas as demarcated and explicated in the Final Basic Assessment Report (FBAR), SRK Project Number We wish to state that we are not opposed to aquaculture developments per se and recognise the industry s potential to contribute to food security, job creation and BBBEE. However, we are opposed to the development, in the sites proposed. This Letter of Objection is to be read in conjunction with and in addition to the SLL's Letter of Objection and addenda submitted 31 st March 2017, as well as objections already submitted by stakeholders / I&APs and incorporated by SRK Consultants under Comments, with particular reference to the SBWQFT comments on the proposed ADZ. Please note: 1. EIA Regulations referred to throughout the commentary below are the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations, 2014 (promulgated in terms of the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 NEMA), as amended by GN R326 of For convenience, the Final Basic Assessment Report long title has been shortened to the FBAR. 3. The FBAR references the Integrated Development Plan (IDP) for the Saldanha Bay Municipality. The IDP is currently in force. (Refer pg 22 of the FBAR).

49 2 1. Socio-economic considerations The FBAR fails to provide a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of the proposed ADZ vis-à-vis t he current and future socio-economic landscape of Langebaan, thereby avoiding an objective evaluation of the need and desirability of the project, in support of the legal requirement. (Section 3 (1) (f) EIA Regulations). The DEA's 2017 Integrated Environmental Management Guideline on Need and Desirability (IEM Guideline) requires a development to be simultaneously ecologically sustainable and socially and economically justifiable (Pg 7 IEM Guideline). Aquaculture has been identified in the FBAR as a [k]ey priority of Operation Phakisa, as it is considered a sustainable strategy to contribute to job creation. And further that it will provide skills development and employment for coastal communities. (Pg i FBAR Executive Summary). The SLL contends that the number of direct and indirect employment opportunities forecast for the proposed ADZ is highly speculative and could be misleading in the authorisation process, given that the FBAR recommends a phased-in approach to the project. (Pg 54 FBAR). Further, due to the raft of unknown/untested ecological impacts and risks posed by the project, the ecological monitoring processes recommended in the FBAR may well result in a further scaling back of the full project scope, which will reduce the potential for job creation. Whilst the FBAR recommends that local goods and services are sourced for the ADZ, there is no procurement plan in place to enforce this ideal, making its eventuation unlikely. (Pg vii Executive Summary Optimisation Measures table). In addition, the FBAR recommends the utilisation of local labour as far as possible. (Pg vii Executive Summary - Optimisation Measures table). It is likely that the labour pool for the ADZ (which will be weighted to unskilled and semi skilled labour) will come from the town of Saldanha Bay due to transport cost constraints for those who live in outlying towns like Langebaan i.e. in reality, employment opportunities in the ADZ for those from the Langebaan community are highly unlikely. Page 47 of the FBAR refers regarding the number of new jobs forecast for the ADZ project: However, farms will be developed in phases, based on ongoing monitoring, and might not reach full potential as such, investment may be substantially lower. This assessment should be considered in the context of the recommendation in the CapMarine report that the project be phased in over 10 years. At best, the number of predominantly semi and un-skilled positions will take a decade to be realised. Further, it is likely that only a small % of these jobs will come from Langebaan. What needs to be analysed is the number of new employment opportunities that will be generated from the tourism and related sectors during this time in the positive economic growth climate of Langebaan. The urgent need for this analysis is further strengthened by the acknowledgment in the FBAR that Langebaan. fulfils an important role as a recognized holiday and tourist destination. A larger number of permanent residents also settle in Langebaan, increasing the need for the provision of a greater variety of economic opportunities for the local residents (Saldanha Bay SDF 2011). Adequate provision should thus be made to consolidate and expand its important local and regional tourism role and in so doing provide an increased range of economic opportunities. (Pg 48). In contrast to the speculative employment predictions for the proposed ADZ, the contribution to current job creation by Langebaan's hospitality and tourism sectors can be substantiated. Tourism in Langebaan is a lucrative, job-intensive industry. Perhaps ironically, the FBAR recognises that

50 [t]ourism is an important income source in the area, yet fails to support this statement in the mitigation/optimisation measures suggested. (Pg ii Executive Summary). In addition, there is healthy employment growth in Langebaan from the indirect support of the tourism and hospitality industries i.e. construction, service and supply. These sectors offer considerable opportunities for the up-skilling and advancement of employees, critical to sustainable poverty alleviation. There is overwhelming evidence that Langebaan's economic fortunes are inextricably tied into the ease of access by the public to unpolluted waters for multiple water sport activities and events, as well as the intrinsic value of its undisturbed natural seascapes that attracts holiday makers, home-buyers and business investment. The SLL therefore contends that the proposed ADZ threatens to materially compromise a vibrant economy with high growth potential. While the financial viability considerations...might indicate if a development is "do-able", the "need and desirability" will be determined by considering the broader community's needs and interests as reflected in an IDP, SDF and EMF for the area, and as determined by the EIA (Refer pg 8 of the National Framework for Sustainable Development 2008). The Integrated Development Plan (IDP) for Saldanha Bay Municipality ( ) indicates that the commercial services sector (which includes, inter alia, hospitality services in which Langebaan is heavily invested) has shown consistent growth over the past decade and is growing at a faster rate than the overall Municipality's average rate (Pg 43 of IDP). The SLL therefore argues that there is far greater potential for job creation within Langebaan's current economic structure than within that of the proposed ADZ. NEMA requires that the best practicable environmental option is considered i.e. the option that provides the most benefit and causes the least damage to the environment as a whole, at a cost that is acceptable to society, in the long as well as in the short term. (Section 2 (4) (b) of the NEMA). In this context then, how does the proposed ADZ promote the protection of the current ecological capital of Langebaan's waters in a manner that sustains the local community, without compromising the ability of the current and future generations to meet their own needs? (Refer to the National Framework for Sustainable Development). Sea-based aquaculture of the scope and scale proposed cannot co-exist with Langebaan's current socio-economic status quo without a significant cost to Langebaan. Nothing in the FBAR indicates that the benefits of the ADZ as promoted therein can in any way compensate for the socio-economic losses that will be experienced by the Langebaan community. The FBAR fails to consider the impact of job losses from the likely down-turn in tourism in Langebaan. Further, the post-mitigation measures recommend a 1 kilometre buffer between the aquaculture structures and the popular residential and tourist areas of Club Mykonos and Paradise Beach. This narrow margin fails to support the recognition in the FBAR that these visible structures are likely to alter the sense of place and present a visual intrusion. (Pg viii Executive Summary). The consequence being that the current high demand for these properties, which rely on their expansive natural seascape vistas, will taper off, with adverse impacts for the owners and their services and goods suppliers....srk does not anticipate a significant reduction in water sports opportunities, visitors and associated businesses as a result of the project. (Pg 58 FBAR). It is clear to the SLL that very little feedback from I&APs has been seriously considered by the EAP. This unsubstantiated statement is, at best, an uninformed perspective; at worst, a cynical disregard for the representations from 3

51 numerous sporting and tourism organisations and individuals who have expert knowledge and insight regarding the source of and the influences on their revenue flow and who hold a contrary view to that of SRK. We note with interest a reference in the CapMarine Report (Pg 50) that Ross et. al (Carrying capacities and site selection within the ecosystem approach to aquaculture. 2010) consider that social carrying capacity is one of the criteria to consider when evaluating carrying capacity and site selection. Social carrying capacity is defined as the amount of aquaculture that can be developed without adverse social impacts. The FBAR does not include a comparative cost-benefit analysis regarding the impact of the proposed ADZ on Langebaan, thus preventing a comprehensive evaluation of the site selection. DAFF's 2011 Strategic Environmental Assessment recommends that user conflict due to exclusion from mariculture zones for security reasons or negative impacts on tourism and coastal real estate value due to negative aesthetic impacts of fish farms can be ameliorated by site selection. (Pg 4 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA): Identification of potential marine aquaculture development zones for fin fish cage culture. 2011). The SEA goes further in addressing user conflict by recommending that [m]ariculture development should not unduly impact existing economic activities. (Pg 46). Nor should the development...unduly impact existing ecotourism and recreational activities. (Pg. 48). The SLL strongly recommends that the applicant apply its own rationale with regard to the siting criteria for the proposed ADZ! 4 2. Environmental Considerations The points raised by SLL in our Letter of Objection to the BAR, submitted 31 st March 2017, with regard to ecological considerations refers and must be read together with the following commentary. (Letter of Objection pgs 7-9). Attention is drawn to a statement by DAFF that [t]he 2011 National Biodiversity assessment indicated that Langebaan, South Africa s only lagoon ecosystem is vulnerable and recommended that this habitat should not be placed under any additional anthropogenic pressure. (Pg SEA). What comprehensive scientific research has been conducted since this publication that indicates that the health of the lagoon ecosystem is now robust enough to accommodate the known and unknown pressures associated with an aquaculture development of the proposed scale and type? The relatively high fouling rate on the netting of the cages in Saldanha Bay is considered potential problem and will result in the need to exchange cages regularly... (FBAR CapMarine Environmental Concept for a Proposed Sea-Based Aquaculture Development Zone in Saldanha Bay, South Africa. (CapMarine) Appendix 3. Pg 28) How will this be monitored and enforced, with which best practice clean-up standards and with what penalties for the lease-holders? SLL questions the probability of regular exchange of cages occurring, particularly with the cost implications thereof. We therefore contend that too much about the measures to prevent and contain adverse impact are left up to chance. Of particular concern is CapMarine's statement that [t]he trials on salmon in Big Bay were also based on the granting by DAFF of a permit requiring specific monitoring. Information on the monitoring was not provided to CapMarine or SRK other than that the MOM methodology had not been effective as the currents in Big Bay had resulted in difficulties in following this approach (net traps under the cages

52 could not be kept in place due to the current). Similarly, the information from other aquaculture activities in South Africa e.g. Algoa Bay, Mossel Bay and Richards Bay, provided no direct information that could inform the carrying capacity and ramp up of fish farming in Saldanha Bay. (Pg 49. CapMarine). SLL therefore strongly urges that a more rigorous, independent, site-specific scientific evaluation is conducted and submitted for public scrutiny before this application is considered by the competent authority. It is still unclear from the FBAR the composition and origin of the feed planned for the fin-fish production. Will the feed be imported? If so, at what cost? Who will carry the cost thereof i.e. will it be subsidised by government and has this been accounted for in the project cost analysis? Is the feed type standardised for all lease-holders? If so, how will this be monitored and enforced? What impact will the type and origin of feed have on the ecology of the specific site selections? The CapMarine report recommends that the slow strategy is adopted with regard to the project ramping up rates. (Point 5 (b). Pg 52 ibid). However, the report then states that this approach will have economic implications. Does this mean that ramping up at 10% per annum (the slow strategy) will require government to subsidise the aquaculture farmers? The FBAR references the 2015 Environmental Management Framework (EMF) for Saldanha Bay Municipality and recognises the incongruity /lack of clarity contained therein with regard to use of the various zones of the bay's waters. (Pg 25 FBAR). This absence of clarity of what is meant by be careful in the EMF's text demands the application of the precautionary principle with regard to any activities in these waters. Further, Saldanha Bay is a dynamic oceanographic system there are many factors that remain uncertain (with respect to the expansion of aquaculture in the Bay). (CapMarine. Pg 55). With the myriad high risks identified, the porous monitoring measures recommended, how then does this proposal meet the principles of sustainable development in support of the National Development Plan and NEMA? The 2011 National Strategy for Sustainable Development for South Africa describes the concept of sustainability as composing of three overlapping developmental spheres namely, the natural environment, social context and economic activity. These spheres are fully interdependent on the extent and functionality of the others. A trade-off in one sphere will compromise the functionality of another with significant and untenable knock-on effects Public Participation The points raised by SLL in our Letter of Objection to the BAR, submitted 31 st March 2017, with regard to the public participation process refers and must be read together with the following commentary. (Letter of Objection pgs 1-3). The SLL continues to strongly dispute that the public participation process was conducted in a thorough manner, taking into account the interests and needs of stakeholders. (Pg 29 FBAR). We reiterate that the EAP failed to implement the process to full extent and intention envisaged by the EIA Regulations (sections 40 and 4). Numerous members of the Langebaan community were excluded from participating in the process due to language barriers, lack of education (possible illiteracy), lack of access to the notification sites and the limited distribution and readership of the local newspaper selected for the advertisement, as well as lack of critical understanding of the specialist reports. Reasonable alternative methods should have been employed to engage with the Langebaan

53 community more widely, as directed in section 41 (2) (e) of the EIA Regulations. Whether SRK acted reasonably in discharging their duty to facilitate the public participation process as regulated is testable. Reasonableness requires a case to case analysis of the measures taken to facilitate public participation in the specific context. (Refer the judgment in Doctors for Life International v The Speaker of the National Assembly 2005 (6) SA 123 (E)). The Doctors for Life case confirms the need for a tailor-made approach that fits each set of circumstances. Thus the narrow tick box approach by SRK cannot be said to have enabled all potential I&APs' right to participate in and contribute to the application process. Further, the judgment emphasised that in order for the public to fully participate they must be capacitated to do so with the requisite degree of knowledge of the proposed activity. SRK's exclusion of many potential I&APs, the poorly executed consideration of alternatives and the absence of a socio-economic cost to benefit analysis are examples that I&APs could not have been fully capacitated. Further, the DEA Sector Guidelines set out recommendations for the public participation process and include that the process...must make provision for different languages of I&APs. In addition, appropriate communication tools must also be employed. In communities where literacy is an issue, a means to obtain or record verbal submissions should be implemented. (Pg 66). The Guidelines also recommend that the EAP enable I&APs to access skills to assist them to understand highly technical matters relating to environmental risks. (Pg 67). And further, that translators and interpreters must be used where necessary, as well as involving community leaders and community associations to facilitate more effective participation. (Pg 66). Whilst these Guidelines are not mandatory, section 41(2) of the EIA Regulations (2017) requires that the EAP must take into account any relevant guidelines applicable to public participation. How then is the Langebaan community's voice to be heard by the competent authority in the decision-making process if public participation in the current context has been inadequate and exclusionary by its very nature? The requirements under section 41 of the EIA Regulations therefore cannot be said to have been reasonably discharged by SRK Consideration of Alternatives The points raised by SLL in our Letter of Objection to the BAR, submitted 31 st March 2017, with regard to the inadequacy of the interrogation of alternative sites refers. (Letter of Objection pg 3 to 4).In addition, we wish the following to be considered in the decision- making process: The FBAR continues to obfuscate the aquaculture development zone (ADZ) site selection with the use of the catch-all term Saldanha Bay, thereby conflating the already industrialised/ commercialised nature of Saldanha Bay (in and around the harbour) with the undisturbed, recreational waters of Langebaan. The objection by Save Langebaan Lagoon Action Group (SLL) to the proposed ADZ centres largely on the threat posed by the development to the quality, access and use of the waters of Langebaan i.e. the area that de facto falls outside of the industrialised area of the Saldanha Bay harbour (also known as Small Bay). The amended post-mitigation ADZ precincts, as tabled in the FBAR Summary (Table 5 pg 11), concentrate the proposed aquaculture activity in Big Bay North, just off-shore from an established

54 holiday /lifestyle destination that irrefutably attracts visitors and investors because of its uncontaminated waters and expansive, visually unpolluted vistas. The proposed development in Big Bay will have a highly visible footprint from the shoreline, residential and resort areas. This development footprint will fundamentally constrict the usage of Big Bay North and alter the sense of place, currently an undisputed tourism and investment draw-card and a significant contributor to the Saldanha Bay Municipality's economy. The reliance on the term Saldanha Bay with regard to the consideration of alternatives (FBAR pg 17) appears to be a deliberate attempt to encourage the DEA to view the site proposed for the ADZ as simply an extension of an industrialised area that has supported aquaculture activity for a number of years. In this way, the applicant avoids the need to consider that the socio-economic and environmental character of Langebaan is materially different from that of Saldanha Bay. The Saldanha Bay Municipality recognises the critical distinction between the two towns. It is notable that distinctly different descriptions have been used for the two towns in the Saldanha Bay Municipality's 4 th Generation Integrated Development Plan (IDP), pages 30, 33 and 34. The town of Langebaan is described as a picture perfect little village,situated...next to the scenic Langebaan Lagoon. The focus is on its natural and recreational attributes. (Refer pg 34 of the IDP). In contrast, the IDP highlights Saldanha Bay's Sishen-Saldanha iron ore project and its fishing industry as attributes of the town. (Refer pg 33 of the IDP). This clear distinction is also made at of page 30 of the IDP. For an unbiased consideration of site suitability in the context of sustainability principles, it is critical that Small Bay, situated in the visually and ecologically degraded waters of Saldanha Bay harbour, is not viewed in the same context as the Big Bay and Outer Bay areas. It would render any assessment of the feasibility of the site selection nonsensical. We contend therefore that the FBAR does not contain the information that is necessary for the competent authority to consider and come to a decision on the application. (Refer Appendix 1. Section 3(1) of the EIA Regulations. In addition, we contend that the stated motivation (refer pg 17 of the FBAR) of assessing no alternatives to siting the ADZ in the Saldanha Bay area (inclusive of the Big Bay and Outer Bay precincts), as the preferred location, cannot be said to meet the definition of a motivation as envisaged in Appendix 1, section 3 (1)(h)(x) of the EIA Regulations. Further, the failure to submit a full description of the process followed to reach the proposed preferred alternative..., (as required in Appendix 1, section 3(1)(h) of the EIA Regulations), renders the FBAR procedurally flawed. The applicant's highly selective and expedient consideration falls far short of the detailed requirements in section 3 (1) (h) and (i). (Refer pgs 21 to 24 of the FBAR). 7 The DEA's 2010 Sector Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations recommend that [f]rom an EIA best-practice point of view, the purpose of considering alternatives is to identify the most appropriate option from an environmental perspective (i.e. considering biophysical and socioeconomic factors). Further, the Sector Guidelines recommend that the applicant takes cognisance of [a]ll reasonable options across all categories and types of alternatives. (Pg 62 Sector Guidelines). This guideline supports the legal requirement that numerous categories and types of alternatives must be explored in order for the applicant to fulfill the imperative to consider alternatives. (Appendix 1 Section 2 (b) to (e) of the EIA Regulations). The SLL contends that the applicant would have met the requirement of reasonableness if they had conducted a comprehensive assessment of shore-based aquaculture in the vicinity of Saldanha Bay, especially as the applicant has acknowledged that the marine environment is sensitive (pg iii of FBAR Executive Summary) and that [t]ourism is an

55 8 important income source in the area (pg ii ibid). The assertion that [a] feasibility study conducted for DAFF in 2016 identified Saldanha Bay as the primary site available for mussel and oyster culture in South Africa. When read together, a financial feasibility study commissioned by DAFF (2016) and a national Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) for fin-fish culture (2012) identified Saldanha Bay as the only area suitable for cage-based salmon production in South Africa... (pg v FBAR Executive Summary) is a convenient avoidance of the full extent of the applicant's mandatory duty to also consider alternatives that are reasonable under the EIA regulations. The Sector Guidelines advise that [e]xtreme care must be exercised when excluding alternatives solely on the basis of financial feasibility. Feasibility needs to be more holistically considered and take account of environmental and social constraints as well (pg 60 of Sector Guidelines). SLL contends that the poorly executed assessment of alternatives is indicative that a cautionary approach was not followed by the applicant. 5. Ecological Considerations The National Development Plan 2030 (NDP) (2012) stresses that the threat to the environment and the challenge of poverty alleviation are closely intertwined and as such environmental policies should not be framed as a choice between the environment and economic growth. (Pg.5 IEM Guidelines 2017). SLL asserts that the number of threats to the ecosystem identified in the FBAR in the postmitigation scenarios are unambiguously indicative that the proposed ADZ has placed economic consideration ahead of ecological consideration. The number of measures proposed in order to ameliorate irrefutable threats to the ecology are overwhelming, subject to interpretation of the site developers and lacking in enforceable application. There is considerable scientific uncertainty regarding the impacts of the scale and type of aquaculture proposed, in the unique ecosystem conditions of the identified sites. Extrapolating data from a very limited aquaculture trial is an unreliable and risky base from which to accurately assess the impacts of the scaled up project. A more risk-averse approach would have been to engage attentively and openly with experts who have credible long-term data for the local environmental conditions e.g. the Saldanha Bay Water Quality Forum Trust (SBWQFT). The FBAR conveniently omits consideration of the merits of the scientific evidence in the SBWQTF report, (as attached), regarding the health of the waters sited for the proposed ADZ. As such, the information regarding this critical component of the application is incomplete/ lacking. SLL contends that the legion of mitigation measures recommended are unrealistic, and do not support Section 24O(1)(b)(iii) of NEMA and the National Development Plan. Further, that insufficient measures have been recommended to ensure that the costs of remedying pollution, environmental degradation and consequent job losses in Langebaan and of preventing, controlling or minimising further pollution, environmental damage or job losses will be paid for by those responsible for harming the environment. (Section 2(4)(p) of NEMA refers). Nor does the FBAR contain a wellresearched scientifically based, enforceable decommissioning plan, which should be a pre-condition to any lease allocation. The paucity of these critically important post facto measures makes the ADZ proposal additionally high risk and untenable. In conclusion, we trust that the applicant /proponent will apply its mind to our Letter of Objection in full compliance with and in support of the tenets of administrative justice. Please note that all current members of Save the Langebaan Action Group (SLL) are registered I&APs and

56 9 further, that all current members have given SLL proxy to represent them in this objection (proof of letters of proxy on request). Please ensure that all correspondence with regard to the above is ed to Yours sincerely Jennifer Kamerman On behalf of Save the Langebaan Lagoon Action Group

57

58

59 Du Toit, Jessica From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Barend Stander 19 June :52 PM Du Toit, Jessica RE: Release of Saldanha ADZ Final BAR for public comment Dear Jessica, Can you please include two additional species of algae for cultivation: Macrocystis and Laminaria? Best Regards Barend Stander Molapong Aquaculture From: Du Toit, Jessica Sent: 23 May :53 PM To: Reuther, Sue Subject: Release of Saldanha ADZ Final BAR for public comment Dear Madam/Sir, Our below refers. We noted that Figure 7 in the Executive Summary had not updated properly. Please find attached the corrected Executive Summary, which has also been uploaded to our website. Best regards, Jessica From: Du Toit, Jessica Sent: 18 May :39 To: Reuther, Sue <SReuther@srk.co.za> Subject: Release of Saldanha ADZ Final BAR for public comment Dear Madam/Sir Release of Final Basic Assessment Report for proposed Saldanha Aquaculture Development Zone (ADZ) for public review SRK Consulting (South Africa) Pty Ltd (SRK) was appointed by the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF) to undertake the Basic Assessment (BA) process required in terms of the National Environmental Management Act (Act 107 of 1998), as amended (NEMA) and the EIA Regulations, 2014, as amended, for a sea-based ADZ in Saldanha Bay, comprising of several precincts. The BA Report was made available for public comment for an extended public comment period from 8 February to 31 March In response to the approximately 60 submissions and petitions received on the BA Report, the report was updated. A comprehensive Comments and Responses table is provided in BAR Appendix E10. 1

60 The Final BA Report is now being released for public comment until 19 June Please find attached the Executive Summary. The full documentation can also be downloaded from SRK s website at Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned should you have any queries or require additional information. Regards, Jessica du Toit BSc (ConsEcol), MPhil (Env Mgmt) Environmental Consultant SRK Consulting (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd The Administrative Building, Albion Spring, 183 Main Road, Rondebosch, 7700 Postnet Suite # 206, Private Bag X18, Rondebosch, 7701 Tel: +27-(0) ; Fax: +27-(0) Mobile: + 27-(0) ; Direct: +27-(0) jedutoit@srk.co.za This transmission is intended for the sole use of the addressee, and may contain information that by its privileged and confidential nature is exempt from disclosure under applicable law. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or duplication of this transmission by someone other than the intended recipient or its designated agent is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this transmission, or by collect call to the above phone number. Please consider the environment before printing this . 2

61 19 June 2017 Langebaan Coastal Links Co/ Mrs Solene Smith Gousblom Straat Langebaan Tel For attention: Ms S Reuther SRK Consulting Cc Ms Andrea Bernatzeder Operations Manager: Aquaculture Phakisa Delivery Unit Department of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries Dear Ms Reuther Re: Request to include Small-scale Fisheries Policy implementation in the Environmental Impact Assessment for Aquaculture Development Zone in Saldanha Bay I write on behalf of the Langebaan Small-scale Fisheries (SSF) community. recognised small-scale fishing community association. We are a We appreciate your feedback on our comments submitted on the BAR Report and we also wish to inform you that we have met with Ms Andrea Bernatzeder (DAFF), to discuss our concerns regarding the project. We would like to request that the issue of the SSF fishers access rights and the demarcation of the SSF Zone in terms of the MLRA Regulations on SSF (2016), (including all aspects of SSF traditional fishing which includes a range of species and gear, not just net fish), be included in the Environmental Impact Assessment to be conducted for the Aquaculture Development Zone in Saldanha Bay. In addition, we would like the contents of the SSF policy, in the context of the objectives of the MLRA Amendment Act of 2016, to be taken into consideration in the process of conducting this EIA. We would also like to ensure that we are able to participate fully and effectively in the ADZ Steering Committee, the planning and beneficiation processes. Your assistance in forwarding this request to the appropriate persons is greatly appreciated. Thank you Mrs Solene Smith Chairperson Langebaan Coastal Links Tel

62 Petitioning DAFF Decision makers Save Langebaan Lagoon from a potential aquaculture disaster Save Langebaan Lagoon Disaster Looms for Langebaan Lagoon Aquaculture Development Threat Please note by signing this petition you declare : I declare that I am 18 years of age or older. I declare that I have understood the content of what I have underwritten and have participated in this petition of my own free will Most people associate Langebaan on the West coast of South Africa with the dramatic scenic beauty of the unspoilt tidal lagoon, its long stretches of pristine beaches and sheltered bays, providing protected waters and a temperate climate for a wide variety of leisure activities throughout the year. However, this RAMSAR site of international importance and tourist hot spot is now under considerable threat of ecological degradation and certain economic decline from plans by the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF) to develop an extensive off-shore aquaculture zone in Langebaan s bays. Save Langebaan Lagoon Action Group has started a wide ranging campaign to draw attention to and encourage protest against this environmental and socio-economic injustice. Our role is to educate the public regarding the negative impact that this development will have on the lagoon s ecosystem, the access to its waters and therefore the prosperity of the town. Further, we represent the collective view of like-minded interested and affected residents and home-owners in interactions with the developers and their agents, ensuring that our voice is heard and that important environmental regulatory processes are followed. Save Langebaan Lagoon Action Group is not against aquaculture as an industry we recognise the role that aquaculture can play in contributing to employment creation, food security and addressing the overexploitation of wild marine resources. We therefore would welcome an on-shore aquaculture development in the vicinity of Langebaan. We strongly object to fin fish (and especially alien fin fish) and mussel farming in Langebaan s waters,

63 which will unduly compromise the numerous ecosystem services that the lagoon provides to the Langebaan community. Situated in the South African Cape West Coast Biosphere Reserve, Langebaan is a birding destination of international repute. The extensive intertidal area of the lagoon supports up to water birds in summer, most of which are waders. The five islands to the north of the lagoon provide a home for nearly a quarter of a million sea birds, and include important breeding sites for endemic populations. 12% of the global population of black oystercatchers are found in the Langebaan area. Fish farming operations and infrastructure will adversely impact habitats, breeding patterns, flight paths and access to food and place these sensitive avian colonies at high risk. The lagoon and the surrounding bays provide a multi-purpose recreational zone and as such attract large numbers of holiday makers, as well as local and international water sport events. The vibrant town of Langebaan continues to experience high growth rates, as increasingly South Africans choose to make this town their permanent or second home. The tourism, hospitality and building industries are booming, with a resultant escalation in work opportunities, in contrast to many surrounding rural towns. The fortunes of these sectors and those who work in them will be severely affected by scores of floating fish factories in Langebaan s bays. Whilst the current environmental assessment report, commissioned by DAFF, suggests mitigations for a host of identified risks, it falls abysmally short of setting out a rigorous, mandatory, proactive plan, with independent oversight mechanisms, to comprehensively prevent such risks eventuating. The planned development, sited in a shallow and sensitive lagoon system, presents inherently disproportionate risks of creating numerous long-term ecological and therefore socio-economic damage. Aquaculture is promoted by DAFF as an opportunity for job creation. However, the information available re employment creation as a result of this particular venture, indicates that the number of new permanent jobs predicted pales into insignificance in comparison with current employment statistics in the hospitality and tourism sectors of Langebaan both high growth sectors for the foreseeable future. Further, DAFF emphasises the imperative of food security as a motivation for the development: Of concern, fin-fish farming of alien species (e.g. Atlantic salmon) is a major focus of the aquaculture development zone, with much of the harvest destined for higher LSM markets. Whilst this will yield economic benefits, it is disingenuous and opportunistic to use our country s challenge for food security to justify the farming of stocks that will not benefit the poor. A more responsible approach would be to consider the threat to food security that occurs when healthy ecosystems, like the Langebaan Lagoon, are degraded beyond rehabilitation. If the proposed development is not stopped, the iconic expansive, uncluttered vistas of tranquil turquoise waters will soon be industrialised and visually polluted by fish and mussel farming infrastructure spread across 884 hectares of marine area. Largely unrestricted enjoyment of these waters will become curtailed through no-go zones around the fish farms and the likelihood of no-access days due to toxic effluent contamination. The sustainability of the richly diverse ecosystem of the Langebaan lagoon, and the welfare of the communities

64 who live on her shores, is inextricably dependent upon the health of this valuable wetland system. This is the link to the SRK Consulting website it has all official documents regarding the proposed aquaculture development -

65 Signatures Name Location Date Aston Wright cape town,, South Africa ebeth grobbelaar Langebaan,, South Africa Michael Ellingham Langebaan,, South Africa Christo Conradie Bellville,, South Africa Rushé Visagie Langebaan,, South Africa Derek Ellis Sutton Mallet, ENG, United Kingdom Ann Pienaar Vredekloof-Hoogte,, South Africa Inge Frost Langebaan,, South Africa JH Louw PRETORIA,, South Africa Claire Coetzer Langebaan,, South Africa Leon Florentino Langebaan,, South Africa Nadine Cilliers Langebaan,, South Africa Shelley Wright Cape Town,, South Africa Andre Pretorius Saldanha,, South Africa Renate Russouw Langebaan,, South Africa Annette Grobler Langebaan,, South Africa Megan Swart Langebaan,, South Africa Andrew Kellett Cape Town,, South Africa Joshua Davidson Langebaan,, South Africa Patricia Wolffs Langebaan,, South Africa Muhammad Abdel Fattah Saldanha,, South Africa Bani Botma Welkom,, South Africa Thomas Neethling Yzerfontein,, South Africa James Barratt Langebaan,, South Africa Ydah Bester Riebeek West,, South Africa Natalie Taylor Langebaan,, South Africa Lane Lubbe Langebaan,, South Africa Carien Marais Langebaan,, South Africa Julian Evans Hopefield,, South Africa Andre Joubert Vanderbijlpark,, South Africa

66 Name Location Date Adri Basson Langebaan,, South Africa Madalise Myburgh Langebaan,, South Africa Danielle Boon Cape Town,, South Africa Yvonne Viljoen Langebaan,, South Africa MM Musetti Langebaan,, South Africa Riaan Malan Vredenburg,, South Africa Greg Muller Langebaan,, South Africa Heinrich De klerk Pretoria,, South Africa Sarisa Van der merwe Langebaan,, South Africa Ronel Wickens Lutzville,, South Africa Liana de la Querra Cape Town,, South Africa Denis Caldwell Langebaan,, South Africa Stephen Borstlap Langebaan,, South Africa Angelique Le roux Langebaan,, South Africa Jane Plit Cape Town,, South Africa Emce Jacobs Grabouw,, South Africa Yolandi Kirsten Lsngebaan,, South Africa Lloyd Bettles Thrapston, ENG, United Kingdom Diana Burns, Australia Monika Pieterse Vredenburg,, South Africa Andre de Beer Durban,, South Africa Andre Kotze Langebaan,, South Africa Ulogi Lee Chiayi,, Taiwan George Hickman Langebaan 7357,, South Africa Susanna Maria Porter Gauteng,, South Africa Hennie Pienaar Cape Town,, South Africa Cynthia Kruger Pretoria,, South Africa Philip Whittaker Cape Town,, South Africa Danel Smit Durbanville,, South Africa Basiliki Wollenschlaeger Table View,, South Africa Alco Brand Vredenburg,, South Africa Keenan Richards Cape Town,, South Africa

67 Name Location Date Corne Smith Langebaan,, South Africa Eric Gryffenberg Langebaan,, South Africa Nicolene van der Vee Cape Town, Western Cape,, South Africa Alwyn Geyser Saldanha,, South Africa Annette Nel Langebaan,, South Africa Lindy Wright Johannesburg,, South Africa Sanra chambers Vredenburg,, South Africa Niko Sadie Malmesbury,, South Africa Clifford Wright Langebaan,, South Africa Collin Swart Durbanville,, South Africa Bashka Chojnowski Langebaan,, South Africa Keith Louw De Kelders,, South Africa Denise Lindsay Cape Town,, South Africa Faye Chojnowski Derby, ENG, United Kingdom Surette O'Brien Pretoria,, South Africa Peter Buchanan Langebaan,, South Africa Wendy Paviour Wakkerstroom,, South Africa Justin Walker Melkbos,, South Africa Ruhan De villiers Langebaan,, South Africa Renier Botha Langebaan,, South Africa Rachel King Langebaan,, South Africa Johan Viljoen Langebaan,, South Africa Pieter Van Niekerk Cape Town,, South Africa Delani de Waal Saldanha Bay,, South Africa Dioné Vermeulen Langebaan,, South Africa Amanda Kotze Langebaan,, South Africa Melinda Botma Langebaan,, South Africa Daleen Swart Langebaan,, South Africa Shelley Gastrell Cape Town,, South Africa Vanessa Koopman Cape town,, South Africa Cara Leach Langebaan,, South Africa Enid Van Jaarsveld Bellville,, South Africa

68 Name Location Date Sandra North Langebaan,, South Africa Annemarie Reis Mossel Bay,, South Africa Harry Brehm Blouberg,, South Africa Gloria Alberts Langebaan,, South Africa Teru Adamson Cape Town,, South Africa Cameron Boustead Cape Town,, South Africa Daryl Mcwilliams Port elizabeth,, South Africa Frank Cornelissen Langebaan,, South Africa SHELLEY STREET Cape Town, GA, United States Ros Smith Langebaan,, South Africa taryn hesse cape town,, South Africa Tania Hales Cape Town,, South Africa Linda Heather-Noon Cape Town,, South Africa Louna Niehaus Langebaan,, South Africa Tracey Bell Cape Town,, South Africa Clinton Coomer Cape Town,, South Africa Debbie Ward Langebaan,, South Africa richard kohler Langebaan,, South Africa Theresa Lind Cape Town,, South Africa Daniel Koch Capetown,, South Africa liz ceruti Cape Town,, South Africa Sanet Langenhoven Langebaan,, South Africa Justin Fox Cape Town,, South Africa Ed Nilson Cape Town,, South Africa Dario Diozzi Kempton Park,, South Africa Lee-Ann Gouws Langebaan,, South Africa Charles Melck Somerset west,, South Africa Marius van der Sandt gauteng,, South Africa Bradley Fourie Langebaan,, South Africa Damien Botha Cape Town,, South Africa Antoinette Brand Langebaan,, South Africa Denise Barnard LANGEBAAN,, South Africa

69 Name Location Date Marian Posniak Cape Town,, South Africa Mary Ann Farrell Cape Town,, South Africa Joan Coomer Saldanha,, South Africa June Perrett Britannia Bay,, South Africa André de Kock Pretoria,, South Africa Margien Matthews Cape Town,, South Africa Mandy Slade Cape Town,, South Africa Diana Hale Hermanus, ENG, South Africa Ivan van Niekerk Milnerton,, South Africa Nikki van Coller Cape Town,, South Africa Justus Van der Berg Johannesburg,, South Africa Margie Wilson Fish Hoek WC South Africa,, South Africa Clare Scott Stanley,, Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Wesley oakes cape town,, South Africa Linda Boswell Cape Town,, South Africa Sam Hale Cape Town,, South Africa steve bell cape town,, South Africa Juan Prins Langebaan,, South Africa Jannie Roos Langebaan,, South Africa florent boucher, France Julien Chauvet Saldanha,, South Africa Marilyn Copping Cape Town,, South Africa Charlotte Atkinson Cape Town,, South Africa June Forster CORNUBIA,, Australia Wendy Williams Hove, ENG, United Kingdom Charmaine Hugo Southern River,, Australia Josias Smith Cape Town,, South Africa Anthony Simpson Langebaan,, South Africa Robert Louw Langebaan,, South Africa Russell Vollmer Cape Town,, South Africa Neal Douglass Cape Town,, South Africa Megan Bagshaw Cape Town,, South Africa

70 Name Location Date Will Scott Cape Town,, South Africa Ron Keytel cape town,, South Africa Jeremy Rorich Cape Town,, South Africa Barbara Rickard Cape Town, ENG, South Africa heiner kuhnel cape town,, South Africa Helenrichter Richter Cape Town,, South Africa Ilse Van der Walt Edleen,, South Africa David Jeffrey Hamilton Walker L'Agulhas,, South Africa Petrus Vermeulen Cape Town,, South Africa Cleeve Robertson Cape Town,, South Africa Kim Richter Cape Town,, South Africa Schoeman Hannah en Paul LANGEBAAN,, South Africa Deirdre Le Rouxs Langebaan,, South Africa Craig Strachan Cape Town,, South Africa HJ Lamprecht Sunningdale,, South Africa Jennifer Gail Young Langebaan,, South Africa Eva Needham Langebaan,, South Africa margit voss West Challow, ENG, United Kingdom Marc De fondaumiere Cape Town,, South Africa Michelle Westhuizen Langebaan,, South Africa Paula Day Cape Town,, South Africa lemanja davidson Johannesburg,, South Africa Heinrich Mouton Langebaan,, South Africa Penny Davis Langebaan,, South Africa Tina dekwaadsteniet Saldanha Bay,, South Africa Clinton CarterBrown Johannesburg,, South Africa Roleyn Nortier Langebaan,, South Africa Louise Du Plessis Langebaan,, South Africa T Butti Cape Town,, South Africa William Patrick Cape Town,, South Africa Cathy Jenkins Cape Town,, South Africa Jason Dickson Gauteng,, South Africa

71 Name Location Date Andrew Strachan Jhb,, South Africa Louis Van der Walt Langebaan,, South Africa Hugo Erasmus Langebaan,, South Africa Stephen Brittle Cape Town,, South Africa Annerine Ferreira Langebaan,, South Africa janet scott Langebaan,, South Africa Jonathan lesueur Blackwater, ENG, United Kingdom Jason Croxford Langebaan,, South Africa Malcolm Hughes Durban,, South Africa David Kruyt Cape Town,, South Africa Johann Hanekom Langebaan,, South Africa Virginia Damerell-Moss Schweizer-reneke,, South Africa Annette Ebing Langebaan,, South Africa Bob Timms Durban,, South Africa janice maltby langebaan,, South Africa Nathalie Tedder Cape Town,, South Africa Valerie Ross Royal Wootton Bassett, ENG, United Kingdom Joan Wilken Napier,, South Africa Mandri De Villiers Roswell, GA, United States Clare Galloway Windhoek,, Namibia Vera Jonkers Irene,, South Africa tessa shrem Jerusalem,, Israel Diane Schaafsma Western Cape,, South Africa Michael Case Johannesburg,, South Africa Hannes Van Zyl Country Club, Langebaan,, South Africa Maria Basson Cape Town,, South Africa Sandy Morris Cape Town,, South Africa John Bashkier Cape Town,, South Africa Jean Jourdan Leer,, Germany Jean Carter-Brown Pietermaritzburg,, South Africa Grant Brook Johannesburg,, South Africa

72 Name Location Date Lynette Dickason Beaconsfield, ENG, United Kingdom IAN KNIPE didim,, Turkey Ulyn Botha Robertson,, South Africa Karina Stowik Langebaan,, South Africa Amanda Rootman CT,, South Africa Festus Linstrom Langebaan,, South Africa Tim Short Cape Town,, South Africa Regina Neethling Stellenbosch,, South Africa Britta Lohrke Cape Town,, Namibia Eric Groenewoud Blouberg,, South Africa Cathy Croxford Langebaan,, South Africa Janet Lucas Langebaan,, South Africa Steve de Bruyn Langebaan,, South Africa Melanie Cloete Cape Town,, South Africa Bev Furnell Port Owen,, South Africa Lynette Fleming Auckland, New Zealand,, New Zealand Kerry Cooper Newlands,, South Africa Linda Kellett Cape Town,, South Africa Tim Venter Tableview,, South Africa Hennie Olivier Cape Town,, South Africa Wayne Kempen Cape Town,, South Africa John Drinkrow Velddrif western cape,, South Africa Roland Schaeffer Cape Town,, South Africa Jean Nel Langebaan,, South Africa Robyn Richter Cape Town,, South Africa Taryn Russ Cape Town,, South Africa byron tippett Miami, FL, United States Marilyn Schock Sydney,, Australia Peter Smith Langebaan,, South Africa Jason Heywood Johannesburg,, South Africa Nelia Strydom Cape Town,, South Africa Bill Russell Cargill, Australia

73 Name Location Date Jake Boer Cape Town,, South Africa tracy feldon Cape town,, South Africa Derrick Frazer Cape Town,, South Africa Richard Willmore Cape Town,, South Africa Sonya Seabrook Uys Langebaan,, South Africa Bernard Buckley Capetown,, South Africa Bea Staal, Netherlands Malcolm Paul Cape Town,, South Africa Johan Basson Langebaan,, South Africa Peter Du Toit Langebaan,, South Africa Elfi Tomlinson Fish Hoek,, South Africa Davey James Cape town,, South Africa MERVYN BREMNER Pietermaritzburg, KZN, South Africa,, South Africa Sonja Graser Cape town,, South Africa Linmari Swart Cape Town,, South Africa Jacques Groenewald Brackenfell,, South Africa De Wet Pretorius Cape Town,, South Africa Christopher Laros Durbanville,, South Africa Vaughn Borrageiro Cape Town,, South Africa Kirsty Marais Cape town,, South Africa Karen Rothschild Johannesburg,, South Africa Mika Uys Cape Town,, South Africa Kim Germishuys Cape Town,, South Africa Andrew French Langebaan,, South Africa Michelline Smith Cape Town,, South Africa Buff van Westenbrugge Cape Town,, South Africa Fiona Barnardo Cape Town,, South Africa Paul van As Johannesburg,, South Africa Christine Seale Langebaan,, South Africa Christine Banks Cape Town,, South Africa Theo Ebing Langebaan,, South Africa

74 Name Location Date Alma van As Johannesburg,, South Africa Anita van de Venter Langebaan,, South Africa Rynard Muller Langebaan,, South Africa Kobus Swart Randburg,, South Africa Cara Wileman Cape town,, South Africa Trevor Banks Cape Town. South Africa,, South Africa Patricia Ryan langebaan,, South Africa Shane Kempen Cape Town,, South Africa Deana Everts East London,, South Africa Paul Amphlett Little bollington, ENG, United Kingdom Joyce Blows Cape Town,, South Africa Micheline de Ravel West Beach, Cape Town,, South Africa Belinda Lyne Cape Town,, South Africa Jana Ochse BRONKHORSTSPRUIT,, South Africa Chris James Cape Town,, South Africa Jacques Venter Langebaan,, South Africa VERONICA KNOOP CAPE TOWN,, South Africa Alan Waistell Langebaan,, South Africa zoe rumbelow flamingo vlei,, South Africa Jeanine Anderson Langebaan,, South Africa Diane Stokell Cape Town,, South Africa Julius Pistorius Bela Bela,, South Africa Samantha Goosen, Australia T P Cape Town,, South Africa Nicolette Lehmann Cape Town,, South Africa dionne atkinson cape town,, South Africa John Brown Langebaan,, South Africa Frederick Jacques Van Coller Langebaan,, South Africa Wikus Naude Langebaan,, South Africa Marissa Naude Langebaan,, South Africa Rodney Pitter Randburg,, South Africa Sjoske Tuinstra, Netherlands

75 Name Location Date cameron moore langebaan,, South Africa vanita theunissen Hopefield,, South Africa Lizelle Coetzee Weillington,, South Africa Henri van Rooyen Johannesburg,, South Africa Gary Fourie Cape Town,, South Africa Ricardo Barnard Muizenberg,, South Africa Angela Voges Langebaan,, South Africa Bernard Voges Langebaan,, South Africa Neville Cooper Gordons Bay,, South Africa Carol-Anne Smit Langebaam,, South Africa Marietjiie Muller Langebaan,, South Africa athol cooper Cape Town,, South Africa Xander Ferreira Langebaan,, South Africa Fiona Valk Cape Town,, South Africa Catherine Austin Cape Town,, South Africa Elizabeth Charlton Langebaan,, South Africa Theresa Howell Velddrif,, South Africa David George Langebaan,, South Africa KENNETH SARA CAPE TOWN,, South Africa Sunette Pitman Langebaan,, South Africa jenny Fletcher cape town,, South Africa Philip Opperman Saldanha,, South Africa Ross Nicholas Cape Town,, South Africa Alan Kennedy Johannesburg,, South Africa Mogamat Slarmie Cape Town,, South Africa Sue Eaton, Australia mercia Smith Cape Town,, South Africa Matthys Cawood Cape Town,, South Africa Brent Webber cape town,, South Africa Hela strez Cape Town,, South Africa Albert Towill Durban,, South Africa Clayton Bell Cape Town,, South Africa

76 Name Location Date Andre Knoop Prince albert road,, South Africa Suzan Stanton Cape town,, South Africa Yolanda Muller Langebaan,, South Africa Cara Williams West Coast,, South Africa Lee Mengel Cape Town,, South Africa Ludwig Schnettler Durbanville Cape Town,, South Africa Lindsay De Kock Somerset West,, South Africa Gillian Meyer Durban,, South Africa Sean Keith Surrey,, United Kingdom Stefan Böner, Germany Thomas Rycroft Cape Town,, South Africa Minota van Bergen Langebaan,, South Africa Monique Frekicia Bridger Vredenburg,, South Africa Clive OConnell Bushey, ENG, United Kingdom Maggie Smith Glasgow, SCT, United Kingdom Hans Klein Lanebaan,, South Africa Lyn Hamer Cape Town,, South Africa Iain Fergusson Abu Dhabi,, United Arab Emirates Zayn Kaptein Cape Town,, South Africa René Kruse Cape Town,, South Africa Elaine West Kloppers Somerset West,, South Africa Darren Nesbitt Cape Town,, South Africa Valda Finch Cape Town,, South Africa Jeanette Geldenhuys Langebaan,, South Africa Veronica Cobley Sunningdale,, South Africa shaun kemp Cape Town,, South Africa Thea Lategan gauteng,, South Africa Byron My Western Cape,, South Africa Carlos Barrero siendones, Netherlands Gavin Mac Kinnon Cape Town,, South Africa ivan karemaker langebaan,, South Africa H Le R Johannesburg,, South Africa

77 Name Location Date Bradley Brown Cape Town,, South Africa Nick Roux Wellington,, South Africa Lindie Engelbrecht Witbank,, South Africa Neil Hopkins Cape Town,, South Africa Marlin Amdur Benoni,, South Africa vanessa rossouw CAPE TOWN,, South Africa joanne lourens Stellenbosch,, South Africa Grant Crankshaw Gan Haim,, Israel munsief jassiem Cape Town,, South Africa Llyle Stevens Langebaan,, South Africa Christine West Langebaan,, South Africa Michael Shaw Langebaan,, South Africa andrea Shaw Langebaan,, South Africa Andrew Collins Constantia,, South Africa Albertus Walters langebaan,, South Africa Ian Everts Langebaan,, South Africa Kerryn Vermeulen Cape Town,, South Africa Leani Barnard Langebaan,, South Africa Christine Tranter Hermanus,, South Africa Alaney Fernley Haydock, ENG, United Kingdom Craig Butters Cape Town,, South Africa Claire Butters Cape town,, South Africa Chantelle Rose Cape Town,, South Africa Pieter van der Merwe Langebaan,, South Africa Howard Steele Cape Town,, South Africa Jean Du plessis Langebaan,, South Africa Eugene Robb Cape Town,, South Africa Ilene Barrington Cape Town,, South Africa Carla Wagener Langebaan,, South Africa Megan du Preez Langebaan,, South Africa Penny Fagan Langebaan,, South Africa Michel du Preez langebaan,, South Africa

78 Name Location Date Hugo Hulsman Cape Town,, South Africa Jacques de Kock Brackenfell,, South Africa Lizelle Stevens LANGEBAAN,, South Africa Lindy Dollan Newcastle upon Tyne, ENG, United Kingdom Russell Damerell-Moss Kimberley,, South Africa Cayleigh Combrink Cape town,, South Africa Cayla Jackson Cape Town,, South Africa Gunnar Heiberg Port Owen,, South Africa ralf dillmann Tableview,, South Africa Carmellia Steele Cape Town,, South Africa gerhardus voges langebaan,, South Africa Jane Butters Cape Town,, South Africa Deshaan Pillay Port Elizabeth,, South Africa rick kloppers strand,, South Africa Ruth Johnson Cape Town,, South Africa Kim Chaplin Birchington,, United Kingdom Matthew Thomas Cape Town,, South Africa Justin Atkins Cape Town,, South Africa Louise Jones Cape Town,, South Africa Zaakirah Dalwai Saldanha,, South Africa Ian Shepherd Nottingham, ENG, United Kingdom Pretorius Stilbaai,, South Africa Kim Hooper-Stanley Ridgefield, CT, United States Carola van Zyl Cape Town, WC, South Africa,, South Africa graham hack cape town,, South Africa Michael Sedgwick Cape Town,, South Africa candice johnston Cape Town,, South Africa Zoe Daniels Cape Town,, South Africa Adri Mentz Cape town,, South Africa raeesa hoosain Johannesburg,, South Africa Louis Norton Tel aviv,, Israel Deidre Van der Merwe Nehalem, OR, United States

79 Name Location Date Ruari Galbraith, Germany Erna Smit wellington,, South Africa Anthony Lambrechts Gaborone,, Botswana Paul Shaw Cape town,, South Africa Willem Pretorius Vanderbijlpark,, South Africa Faizel Hunter Cape town,, South Africa Shaheed Philander Cape Town,, South Africa Ighsaan Carr Cape Town,, South Africa Allen Ramsay Langebaan,, South Africa Niki Lauinger Cape Town,, South Africa Wendy Maxwell Aldershot, ENG, United Kingdom Garth solomon Cape Town,, South Africa Julian Venter Cape Town,, South Africa Tünde Terblanche Langebaan,, South Africa Hendrik Gouws langebaan,, South Africa Lindi Goddard Cape Town,, South Africa Nicola Kloppers Pretoria,, South Africa Jané Ansell Langebaan,, South Africa Jacoba Venter Velddrif,, South Africa Lindy Solomon Cape Town,, South Africa Lesley Robinson Saldanha,, South Africa Riaan Van belkum Langebaan,, South Africa Greg Wepener Cape Town,, South Africa Selwyn Schneider Cape Town,, South Africa Wurzinger Karsten Saitama City,, Japan Michael Beardwood Cape Town,, South Africa Lynette Thompson Cape town,, South Africa Elsie Krugel Langebaan,, South Africa Lars Kessel Cape Town,, South Africa Nedine Olivier Langebaan,, South Africa Brigid Reid, France Paul Armstrong Cape Town,, South Africa

80 Name Location Date Nita Brand Langebaan,, South Africa Jackie Steele Tokai Cape Town,, South Africa Chante Visagie Langebaan,, South Africa Niel Van der Merwe Cape Town,, South Africa Bianca van Breda Cape Town,, South Africa hazel ball Christchurch, ENG, United Kingdom Andreas Poppmeier Johannesburg,, South Africa Steve Ruck Cape Town,, South Africa Riaan Redelinghuys Langebaan,, South Africa Jonathan Gevisser Cape Town,, South Africa Carolyn Kooy Caoe Town,, South Africa Freddy De Andrade Cape Town,, South Africa Paul Apsey Cape Town,, South Africa Margaret Visagie Saldanha,, South Africa Richard Tappenden Langebaan, Cape Town,, South Africa Esme Beamish Hout Bay,, South Africa Charlton Petersen Cape Town,, South Africa Errol van der Hoeven Paarl,, South Africa Helen Cooper Cape Town,, South Africa Gabriella Viljoen Clermont, FL, South Africa Graeme Perry Cape Town,, South Africa Jeffrey Meiring Langebaan,, South Africa Karen Harrison Langebaan,, South Africa Thinus Liebenberg Langebaan,, South Africa Theron Johan Goodwood,, South Africa Lindy Lewis Cape Town,, South Africa Alexander Krenz Cape Town,, South Africa Roger harrison. Harrison Langebaan,, South Africa Deirdre Meyer Mason, OH, United States Megan Mac Tavish Saldanha,, South Africa Harry Stevens Cape Town,, South Africa Kristy Bester Krugersdorp,, South Africa

81 Name Location Date Jacques Jean Du Plessis LANGEBAAN,, South Africa Sharlene Pereira Langebaan,, South Africa Christopher Rushman Melkbosstrand,, South Africa Cornelis Johannes Hattingh Langebaan,, South Africa Lilanie Louise Smith Langebaan,, South Africa Maritha Buyskes Langebaan,, South Africa Marinda Janse v Rensburg Langebaan,, South Africa osmond Robertson Langebaan,, South Africa geraldine lloyd Cape Town,, South Africa Johan Kitching Cape Town,, South Africa Ted Buxton Cape Town,, South Africa Nicholas Lee Cape Town,, South Africa Pauline de Cock Atascadero, CA, United States Janinr Malan Cape town,, South Africa Miranda Matthews Langebaan,, South Africa Steve Rahilly Langebaan,, South Africa Alida Botha Langebaan,, South Africa Berna Kotze Cape Town,, South Africa Steve Richardson Langebaan,, South Africa Vickey Louw Langebaan,, South Africa Hester Lindeque Langebaan,, South Africa Philip Meiring Langebaan,, South Africa Kobie Coetzee Vredenburg,, South Africa Wendy Holliday Cape Town,, South Africa sonique smith paarl,, South Africa Mike Hartung Melkbos,, South Africa Denise Goss Cape Town,, South Africa Bennie Strydom Vredenburg,, South Africa Bronwen Tonkil Cape Town.,, South Africa Angelique Wallace Durban KZN,, South Africa Ben Strydom Vredenburg,, South Africa Stephanie Odendaal cape town,, South Africa

82 Name Location Date Adri Van Vuuren Stilbaai,, South Africa Rieta Roestof Langebaan,, South Africa Pierre Malherbe Cape Town,, South Africa Zandri Schoeman Langebaan,, South Africa Nicole Abrahams Langebaan,, South Africa Paul Loubser Langebaan,, South Africa Jannie de Goede Cape Town,, South Africa GERDA Grobler Langebaan,, South Africa Anthony Flesch Phoenix, AZ, United States Verena Pelka Weilheim,, Germany Heidi Nieuwoudt Langebaan,, South Africa Christiaan Janse van Rensburg Vredenburg,, South Africa Terence Ballentine 3 Ithaki close Calypso Beach Langebaan,, South Africa Stephen Suckling Kingston upon Thames, ENG, United Kingdom Margaret Eliasov Langebaan,, South Africa Erens Degenaar Langebaan,, South Africa Pat Evans Kommetjie,, South Africa Selwyn Rhoda Langebaan,, South Africa Jolyon Langerman Cape Town,, South Africa Louise Olliver Stoke Row, ENG, United Kingdom Gregory Nel Cape Town,, South Africa Tessa Suckling St Francis Bay,, South Africa Yolandi Bester St. Helenabaai,, South Africa Louise Pringle Winterton, ENG, United Kingdom David Embleton Langebaan,, South Africa Elise-Marie Tancred Somerset West,, South Africa Mj Rust Malmesbury,, South Africa Suzette Van Dyk Ceres,, South Africa Alet Kruger Langebaan,, South Africa Evert de Jongh Langebaan,, South Africa Margaret Bargmann Ottery St Mary, ENG, United Kingdom

83 Name Location Date ingrid beyleveld port vila,, Vanuatu Chip Pough Norristown, PA, United States John Williams Velddrif,, South Africa Ignatius Coetzee Bloemfontein,, South Africa Abbi Lindenberg Langebaan,, South Africa Sugesan Reddy Langebaan,, South Africa Stef Coetzee Langebaan, Western Cape,, South Africa Gert Fourie Langebaan,, South Africa Erika Woest Margate,, South Africa CAROL KAHN Cape Town, SC, United States Vicky Verwey 전주시, 전라북도, 대한민국,, Korea, Republic of Johan Wessels Pretoria,, South Africa Manfred Hatzenbühler, Germany Alta Van dyk Cape Town,, South Africa Deidre Basson Langebaan,, South Africa Adele Abrahams Vredenburg,, South Africa Leane Britz Port Elizabeth,, South Africa Julian Flesch Montagu,, South Africa monique dwyer cape town,, South Africa Colleen Van Staden Jubail,, Saudi Arabia Louw Cilliers Richards Bay,, South Africa Michael van Ryneveld Cape Town,, South Africa Antoinette Spangenberg Langebaan,, South Africa Deon Burger Malmesbury,, South Africa Jason Taylor Langebaan,, South Africa Francis Kruger Cape Town,, South Africa Liezel Smith Langebaan,, South Africa Roger Metcalfe Cape town,, South Africa Diana Loubser Port Vila,, Vanuatu Trisha Mostert Vredenburg,, South Africa Shane Barker Cape Town,, South Africa

84 Name Location Date B Frylinck Kangebaan,, South Africa Ginny Swart cape town,, South Africa Sharon Jones Langebaan,, South Africa Sue van Ryneveld Cape Town,, South Africa Anna Henning Langebaan,, South Africa Ronelle Meiring Langebaan,, South Africa charmaine maree Cape Town,, South Africa Ferdie Thiart Cape Town,, South Africa Eben Lassen Cape Town,, South Africa Denise Kröhn Paarl,, South Africa Sydney Nelson Tillamook, OR, United States johan wilsnach Durban,, South Africa Marise Heyns Observatory,, South Africa Toby Goss Cape Town, WC, South Africa,, South Africa Nee Alberts Langebaan,, South Africa Gerda Pretorius Graskop,, South Africa Susan Greeff Langebaan,, South Africa Tienie Steyn Langebaan,, South Africa hermanus smit paarl,, South Africa Johan Mornet Langebaan,, South Africa Marcelle Geldenhuys Capre town,, South Africa Geoff Dekenah Langebaan,, South Africa Jacques Laubscher Langebaan,, South Africa Linette Thurling Langebaan,, South Africa Pieter Verwey Langebaan,, South Africa

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106