Staff Report. Re: National Park Service Ferry Landing Facilities at Piers 31, 31½ and 33 Joint Meeting with BCDC Design Review Board

Similar documents
2 SITE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA

Northeast Waterfront Advisory Group Meeting: November 1, 2017 DRAFT Meeting Notes

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

NEWBORO AND PORTLAND HARBOUR REDVELOPMENT PLANS

Treasure Island Supplemental Information Report Addendum

AAPA CRUISE SEMINAR CRUISE FACILITY DESIGN, PROCESSING, SAFETY & SECURITY Jim Rowe, AIA Bermello Ajamil & Partners APRIL 25, 2013

CHAPTER 4 - COMMENTS AND COORDINATION Introduction Comments and Responding to Comments

Appendix L Technical Memorandum Aesthetics

FLINDERS STREET STATION DESIGN COMPETITION STATEMENT OF KEY OBJECTIVES

DRAFT FINAL ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES FOR OUTDOOR DEVELOPED AREAS

Development Agreement No. DA16-002

PORT OF SEATTLE MEMORANDUM. COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 6a ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting August 23, 2016

Bloor Street West Rezoning Application for a Temporary Use By-law Final Report

Slide 1. Waterfront Plan Land Use Subcommittee. Port Seawall Lots

SUMMER VILLAGE OF SILVER SANDS. Municipal Development Plan

The Baker/Carver Regional Trail is intended to

VILLAGE OF WINNETKA, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

AGENDA ITEM 5 D WAKULLA ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTE (WEI) TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY

F6. Coastal Ferry Terminal Zone

FORECASTING FUTURE ACTIVITY

FERRY TERMINAL ST LUCIA

Architectural Review Commission

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO PROPOSED PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE APPLICATION NOVEMBER 9 TH, 2018

The optimum gross floor areas for the predominant land uses within Precinct Five are outlined below in Table 8.1.

CONTENTS. 1 Introduction Always Moving Forward while Building on the Past A Dynamic Destination... 5

Spadina Avenue Built Form Study Preliminary Report

The following criteria shall be applied within the boundaries of the AO District:

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Old Town Village Mixed Use Project City of Goleta. MEETING DATE: June 18, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 5M

GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & RECOMMENDATIONS historic preservation. BUDA 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN preserving our heritage sustaining our future

Outdoor Developed Areas

What s covered. What s not covered. Options for those not covered. ABA Coverage

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Consistency Determination Betteravia Plaza. MEETING DATE: January 21, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 8D

Airport Planning Area

PRELIMINARY STAFF PLANNING REPORT TO THE WALWORTH COUNTY ZONING AGENCY X CONDITIONAL USE

Schedule of Planning Applications Committee Date: 23 May Reference: 06/18/0064/F Great Yarmouth Officer: Mr J Beck Expiry Date:

Addendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6)

DRAFT GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND SPECIFIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN MIDDLETON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT MOREY FIELD. Revised 12/12/03

Flying Cloud Airport (FCM) Zoning Process: Informing a Mn/DOT Path Forward

COCONUT GROVE WATERFRONT MASTER PLAN. ERA / Curtis Rogers / ConsulTech / Paul George Ph.D.

Waterfront Plan Working Group Meeting Maritime & Water-Dependent Uses Meeting Agenda

Georgetown-Lewes Rail/Trail Study. Rail/Trail Study: Cool Spring to Cape Henlopen State Park New Road Extension (House Resolution No.

Header i

Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Lake Tahoe Airport Master Plan Public Meeting March 16, 2015

A. CONCLUSIONS OF THE FGEIS

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Merced Wild and Scenic River. Comprehensive Management Plan, Yosemite National Park, Madera and Mariposa

CHAPTER 6 NOISE EXPOSURE

Chair and Members of Harbour East - Marine Drive Community Council. Brad Anguish, Director, Parks and Recreation

Safety, Infrastructure, and Tenant Improvement Project. Public Hearing Informational Brochure February 26, 2013

LAND USE GUIDELINES NEW TOWN

Dufferin Jog Elimination Project

Lake Tahoe Shoreline Plan 03 Policy Topic: Access Issues

Westover Metropolitan Airport Master Plan Update

BOSTON, MA 171 TREMONT IMPACT ADVISORY GROUP 5/19/16

Flow Stand Up Paddle Board Parkway Plan Analysis

RIVER ACCESS STRATEGY

Construction Staging Area Blue Jays Way (357 King Street West)

Bridge District Board of Directors Meeting

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT May 10, Members of the Planning Commission. Joyce Parker-Bozylinski, Contract Planner

Business Item No XXX. Proposed Action That the Metropolitan Council approve the Coon Creek Regional Trail Master Plan.

STUDY OVERVIEW MASTER PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

TEMPE BEACH PARK - RECOMMENDATIONS

CHAPTER 5. Chapter 5 Recreation Element

Madison Metro Transit System

LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS' AUTOMATED PEOPLE MOVER

Pier Enhancements April 6, 2017

REAL ESTATE TRANSACTION ADVISORY SERVICES

401, and 415 King Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

CHAPTER 4: ALTERNATIVES

M E S T I Z O C U R T I S P A R K

tt1ll rati;a Ocala International Airport General Aviation Charrette TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM February 28, 2017 Submitted to: Ocala International Airport

New ADA Accessibility Standards for the Attractions Industry

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GALVESTON WHARVES Tariff Circular No. 6

DEVELOPMENT OF TOE MIDFIELD TERMINAL IROJECT CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT REPORT DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION TOM FOERSTER CHAIRMAN BARBARA HAFER COMMISSIONER

Committee Report. Community Development Committee For the Metropolitan Council meeting of August 12, Business Item No.

Site Location and Setting

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Notice and Opportunity to Comment on New Proposed Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) New Application

places Mooloolaba s heart five

Appendix 3. Greenway Design Standards. The Whitemarsh Township Greenway Plan

Union Station Queens Quay Transit Link Study

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport

Pillar Park. Management Plan

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

Appendix F International Terminal Building Main Terminal Departures Level and Boarding Areas A and G Alternatives Analysis

WORLD CLASS CIT Y. WORLD CLASS ASSET. WORLD CLASS TENANTS.

URBAN DESIGN REPORT. Proposed Residential Development, Old Church Road, Caledon East

CLIPPER COVE PROMENADE & MARINA DEVELOPMENT

Pedestrian Safety Review Spadina Avenue

CLASS SPECIFICATION 5/12/11 SENIOR AIRPORT ENGINEER, CODE 7257

Conexus is committed to innovation and bringing financial services to market with speed. We have a long history of innovation, including:

MEMORANDUM. Lynn Hayes LSA Associates, Inc.

The Narrows Waterfront Park A Crown Jewel for Southern Brooklyn

MEETING MINUTES Page 1 of 5

Funding Package TOTAL $15,172,000

Park Design and Location Criteria

2433 Dufferin Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Construction Staging Adelaide Street West

MINUTES DESIGN & REVIEW BOARD. September 8, 2015

Transcription:

Port of San Francisco Waterfront Design Advisory Committee Agenda Item No. 1 Meeting Date: Staff Report To: From: Waterfront Design Advisory Committee: Laura Crescimano Jeff Joslin Marsha Maytum Kathrin Moore Dan Hodapp and Ming Yeung Re: National Park Service Ferry Landing Facilities at Piers 31, 31½ and 33 Joint Meeting with BCDC Design Review Board Project Proponents and Property Owners National Park Service ( NPS ), Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy ( Conservancy ), and Port of San Francisco ( Port, Property Owner) Prior Reviews and Management Earlier iterations of the proposed project s design were proposed by the current ferry service operator, Hornblower Cruises & Events, and reviewed in 2010 and 2012. The current project design is a new proposal, proposed by NPS and the Conservancy. NPS and the Conservancy will also conduct an RFP process to select new future concessionaires to construct the improvements and operate the café and the ferry service. The project area would be jointly managed and maintained by the Conservancy, the food service operator selected to run a café at Pier 31, and the concessionaire for the ferry service. Project Description The project site is located at Piers 31, 31½, and 33, on the San Francisco waterfront, near the intersection of Bay Street, Francisco Street, and The Embarcadero. The site consists of the pier deck located between Pier 31 and Pier 33 (known as Pier 31½) and portions of the Pier 31 and Pier 33 bulkhead and shed buildings. The project site is currently used as a terminal for a ferry service that transports passengers between San Francisco and Alcatraz Island, which is part of NPS Golden Gate National Recreation Area. The terminal includes at the Pier 31½ pier deck, a portable ticket booth, two temporary canopies, passenger queuing areas, interpretive exhibits, limited parking for NPS vehicles, benches, and water stations. A gangway and one float accommodates two berthed ferries from Pier 31½. The Pier 33 shed building includes a restroom and operational space, and within the Pier 33 bulkhead building is the privately-operated Alcatraz Café and Grill. The Pier 31 bulkhead building is vacant. The project site is within the Port of San Francisco Embarcadero Historic District. Visitors may reach the project site via public transit (bus, streetcar, or BART), taxi and rideshare, bicycle, personal vehicle, or walking. There is an ADA-accessible tour bus and drop-off area along The Embarcadero adjacent to the Pier 33 bulkhead building. A 2012 Visitor Flow Survey conducted by NPS found that most visitors arrive by public transportation (35 percent), walk (35 percent), or carpool (28 percent). Various paid parking lots are located in the vicinity of the project site. From The Embarcadero, visitors enter the project site between the Pier 31 and Pier 33 bulkhead buildings, approaching first the ticket booth, circulating through existing interpretive exhibits, and

entering a covered queuing area. A separate pre-boarding area adjacent to the gangway offers seating for passengers with disabilities. In 2016, the Pier 31½ facility served 1.76 million visitors. There were 7,007 annual ferry trips to Alcatraz Island from Pier 31½, which includes service to both Alcatraz Island and Angel Island (the Alcatraz Plus Angel Island Loop ). In addition, during peak season (June to September), the concessionaire operated 133 bay cruises from the site that were not associated with NPS operations. The number of visitors to Alcatraz Island is restricted by the NPS General Management Plan guidelines that limit seasonal service levels based, in part, on large nesting bird populations at Alcatraz Island. Ferries run from Pier 31 ½ every 30 minutes between 8:30 am and 3:30 pm, seven days a week. In addition, there are two evening departures to the island (6 pm and 6:30 pm). A typical visit to the island is approximately two hours, however visitors may remain at the island as long as they like and return on any available vessel. Although the total number of passengers per visit fluctuates throughout the day based on guest flow, the total number of visitors per scheduled departure is limited to approximately 300 passengers. Proposed Project The project would renovate an outdoor space on the Pier 31½ pier deck as well as interior space in the Pier 31 and Pier 33 bulkhead and shed buildings to provide an enhanced visitor experience in keeping with NPS practices. The project would also construct space for administrative and operational functions in the Pier 31 and Pier 33 bulkhead and shed buildings. The proposed boarding ramps and floats would support berthing of up to three ferry boats at a time. In addition to its current ferry routes, the improved terminal would provide limited ferry service for interpretive cruises of the Bay, and a new route between Pier 31 ½ and the Fort Baker pier (City of Sausalito), which is under consideration for such use and operation in a separate proposal. Overall, visitor demand is expected to grow in line with a general growth in tourism in the City and County of San Francisco. NPS modeling forecasts show that in 2018, 7,790 visitors could visit the primary ferry embarkation site per day, or 1.9 million visitors per year. The proposed project would remove the existing non-historic canopy structure, parking area, queuing and ticketing area, and interpretive exhibits at Pier 31½. The existing floating dock and gangway would be removed to accommodate two new floating docks and gangways. Existing uses within portions of the Pier 31 and Pier 33 bulkhead and shed buildings, including the Alcatraz Café and Grill, would cease, and the buildings would be reconfigured and renovated. All work would rehabilitate existing historic elements at the project site, consistent with the Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings. The following improvements are proposed: In the Bay: 1. Expanded Berthing Facilities. An existing floating dock and gangway would be replaced with two individual docking facilities, each with an ADA-accessible gangway, float, and guide piles, to berth a total of three ferry vessels. The landside of the proposed project is characterized by the Project Proponents in three zones: Embarkation, Civic Plaza, and Disembarkation. At the Pier 31½ pier deck: 2. Ticketing and Interpretive Exhibit Area. The queuing area for ticket purchases would be reorganized and new ticket windows would be constructed at the east façade of the 2

Pier 33 bulkhead building. An interpretive exhibit area, including benches, would be created at the plaza area bound by the ticket window area, the primary queuing area, and the public restrooms in the Pier 33 shed building. 3. Primary Queuing Area. A visitor information desk would be installed near the entryway to the queuing area for ticketed passengers adjacent to the Pier 33 shed building. The queuing area would be reorganized from its current configuration, and the existing canopy structure would be replaced by a concrete canopy structure. Benches and glass panels would be used in places to delineate the queuing area. The glass panels would serve as a wind break and would include opaque or semi-transparent overlays with interpretive information. 4. Entryway and Civic Plaza. A public plaza would be created at the center of Pier 31½, extending from the sidewalk at Herb Caen Way to the edge of the pier deck, allowing for Bay views that are now partially obstructed. Stepped seating would be installed at opposite corners of the plaza to provide seating and help organize site circulation. A monument sign similar in design to those found at the Exploratorium (Piers 15/17) and the cruise terminal (Pier 27) would be installed at the Embarcadero entrance. Pedestrian-scale light poles would line the perimeter of the plaza. The plaza paving would be distinct from the remainder of the deck to define the space, along with the seating and lighting elements. 5. Secondary Queuing Area and Café. A secondary queuing area would be provided adjacent to the Pier 31 shed building at the Bay edge. This area would incorporate seating and glass panel elements as described for the primary queuing area. The secondary queuing area would primarily serve the ferry berth used for Bay cruises and proposed service to Fort Baker. An enclosed café with food stalls and seating would be built adjacent to the secondary queue. Both the secondary queuing area and the café would be covered by a single concrete canopy structure. At the Pier 33 bulkhead and shed buildings: 6. East Façade Improvements. New ticket windows would be installed along the east façade, and the façade would be restored, including the historic windows and removal of post-1949 additions. 7. Interior Renovations. The bulkhead building interior would be renovated to accommodate exhibits, retail, and a ticket office. The second floor would be mostly demolished except for a small area to create a mezzanine level for offices and a mechanical platform. Portions of the shed would be renovated for public restrooms, storage, and site operations. At the Pier 31 bulkhead and shed buildings: 8. Interior Renovations. A café would be constructed within a portion of the bulkhead building. Portions of the shed would be renovated to include public restrooms, public bicycle parking, disabled visitor parking (3 spaces), staff and service parking (10 spaces), and site operations. Compliance with Historic Resource Standards The project is subject to review for consistency with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties because it is within the Port of San Francisco Embarcadero Historic District, and includes alterations to Pier 31 and 33 and the adjacent marginal wharf. Piers 31, 33 and portions of the adjacent marginal wharf are contributing resources to the historic district and listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Port Commission adoption of the historic district in 2006 included policy requiring that the Secretary Standards apply to all 3

Port and Non-Port projects within the district. Because the project is also subject to environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the project sponsor has retained the firm of Architectural Resources Group (ARG), Historic Preservation Consultants, who is in the process of evaluating the project for consistency with the Secretary Standards as part of the required CEQA analysis of impacts on historic resources. ARG is in the process of completing their evaluation of the revised project and will issue an updated Historic Resources Report in the near future, which will inform the evaluation of the project's consistency with the Secretary Standards by the Port and in the environmental review process. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Compliance NPS is seeking LEED platinum certification for the work under the system established by the US Green Building Council. Environmental Review A final Environmental Impact Statement was released by NPS in January 2017, and a July 2016 Memorandum of Understanding between NPS and the Port outlines lease terms for a future ferry concessioner and the Conservancy. CEQA review is underway and a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) is anticipated. Public review of an Initial Study/MND will be available beginning in November 2017 with the final document anticipated to be completed by early 2018. Committee Review of the Project The WDAC reviews Port Projects to ensure that they are consistent with policies and design criteria set forth in the Design & Access Element of the Port s Waterfront Land Use Plan. Below are policies and criteria in the Design & Access Element that apply to the proposed project. Page 31, Commercial Facilities Within and Adjacent to Public Access and Open Space - Design public access so that the user is not intimidated nor is the user s appreciation restricted by structures or incompatible uses. Allow accessory commercial activities (e.g. food and beverage services, bike or skate rentals, ferry queuing) within open space and public access areas after maintaining adequate pedestrian circulation and minimizing blockage of the waterfront edge. Allow adjacent commercial uses (e.g. restaurants) to spill out onto public access and open space areas. Clearly delineate adjacent commercial use areas from public use areas with signs, planting, fences, elevation changes, or other distinguishing characteristics. The public access areas allow visitors to reach and travel along the Bay edge. Commercial functions of the project are located inside the bulkheads and where outside they are located out of the most obvious circulation corridors and in the view shadow of the Pier 31 bulkhead. Historic Resource Policies Page 51, Preservation Preserve and adaptively reuse significant historic resources where feasible. The Project would rehabilitate the Embarcadero wall of the Pier 33 bulkhead with a new and enlarged entry to match the original, but currently covered opening. The side wall of the Pier 33 bulkhead and the wall facing the Pier 31½ wharf would be renovated with windows consistent with the original improvements. The project would also include improvements within the Pier 33 shed including installing curtain wall storefronts immediately inside the location of the roll-up doors adjacent to the wharf area. The roll-up doors would be retained in an up position and interior improvements would feature views of the shed roof and structural elements by installing glass above first level partitions. The Pier 31 bulkhead would be renovated to a single full height 4

space exposing its structural elements. Similar to Pier Shed 33, Pier Shed 31 would receive new public restrooms, storefronts and other operational space. All improvements would be evaluated for compliance with the Secretary s Standards as described above. Page 51, Waterfront Character Require development of the waterfront to be compatible with historic resources. All proposed improvements are required to be consistent with the Secretary s Standards. The WDAC should evaluate the new queuing and ticketing canopy and other visitor amenities to determine if they are architecturally compatible with the existing historic resources while also clearly differentiated from them. Page 55, Bulkhead Buildings and Piers Sheds Retain and reuse the historic bulkhead buildings and pier sheds at Piers 9, 15, 31, 33, The Project plans include retaining and reusing Pier 33, the shed and bulkhead building, consistent with the Secretary s Standards as described above. Page 61, Industrial Maritime Character The architectural character of pier development should respect, but not mimic, the historic industrial/maritime character of the waterfront. The Pier 33 historic shed would retain its industrial/maritime character. WDAC members should evaluate the proposed new queuing and ticketing canopy structure to determine conformance with this policy. Page 61, Historic Preservation Retain and reuse the historic piers and pier sheds. The Project plans include retaining and reusing the Pier 33 shed and bulkhead building and the wharf area consistent with the Secretary s Standards as described above. Page 84, Transparency Maximize transparency of pier edges facing adjacent open spaces, to the extent compatible with maritime uses. The Pier 33 roll-up doors would be retained in an up position with new curtain wall storefronts installed to allow views from the shed to the wharf area. In addition, the new concrete canopies over the embarkation and post-tour areas are designed with gently sloping roofs to maximize views below the roofs of the historic pier sheds and of the Bay. Page 84, Open Space Pier 31½ Create a public access area within the pier (wharf) which maintains a view corridor between the Pier 31 and 33 bulkhead buildings to the Bay. The project removes the ticket structure and other site improvements currently within the central (view) corridor and places only low seating structures within this space. Also, the canopies are designed to maximize views as described above. Weather protection for diners is located in the view shadow of the Pier 31 bulkhead and an information kiosk is located in the view shadow of the Pier 33 bulkhead. P:\Planning\Waterfront Design Advisory Committee\Projects\Pier 31-5 Alcatraz\NPS Alcatraz_8-7-17.doc 5