Caroline County / King George County Transit Studies. Meeting November 1, 2017

Similar documents
I-95 Transit/ TDM Study. LRTP Advisory Committee Meeting June 22, 2017

Public Transit Services on NH 120 Claremont - Lebanon

I-95/395 HOV/Bus/HOT Lanes Project Overview

Welcome. Sign in Pick up comment form Visit stations to learn more Submit your comment form

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

Figure 1: Route 56B Hazelwood

Fare Policy Discussion Background and History

SAMTRANS SERVICE PLAN

SRTA Year End Fixed Route Ridership Analysis: FY 2018

This report recommends routing changes resulting from the Junction Area Study.

ROUTE EVALUATION ROUTE 21 Denton County Transportation Authority

2018 Service Implementation Plan Executive Summary

Mount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! wmata.com/bus

FREDERICKSBURG DISTRICT. District Engineer Marcie Parker, P.E. May 8, 2018

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

Mercer SCOOT Adaptive Signal Control. Karl Typolt, Transpo Group PSRC RTOC July 6th, 2017

SAN LUIS OBISPO TRANSIT + SAN LUIS OBISPO RTA JOINT SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS: SERVICE STRATEGIES. Presented by: Gordon Shaw, PE, AICP; Principal

Community Feedback and Survey Participation Topic: ACCESS Paratransit Services

DEMOGRAPHICS AND EXISTING SERVICE

Presentation to the Southeast Corridor High-Performance Transit Alternative Study Public Forum. Overview of MTA. presented by

EL PASO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSIT INSTITUTIONAL OPTIONS ASSESSMENT STUDY

CHERRIOTS 2018 SERVICE PLAN 1

Existing Services, Ridership, and Standards Report. June 2018

Approval of August 2019 Service Changes

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

City of Murfreesboro. Transit Service and Management Alternatives

GoTriangle Short-Range Transit Plan Final Report November 2018

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. The Potomac Rappahannock Transportation Commission is seeking an ABOUT THE ORGANIZATION

Regional Fare Change Overview. Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

FIRST WEEK UPDATE: 66 EXPRESS LANES INSIDE THE BELTWAY Data from first four days shows faster, more reliable trips on I-66

(This page intentionally left blank.)

MUSKEGON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM PROPOSAL FOR FARE AND SERVICE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE PHASED IN BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2018

FIRST WEEK UPDATE: 66 EXPRESS LANES INSIDE THE BELTWAY Data from first four days shows faster, more reliable trips on I-66

II. Terminology and Basic

Transportation Supporting Dulles Airport

St. Johns County Transit Development Plan Update

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

Table of Contents. List of Tables

New System. New Routes. New Way. May 20, 2014

Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs CTAA Expo June 2014

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California

The Boulder (and Boulder County) Experience. June 6 th, 2017 RTD s Pass Program Working Group 2 nd Meeting

WATERBORNE TRANSIT. April 21, 2010

Eleven things you should know about the carpool lanes in Los Angeles County.

STEP ALTERNATIVES RANKING TABLE

RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN:

COLT RECOMMENDED BUSINESS PLAN

Figure 2: Public Transit Systems Operating in Northern Virginia Operating Statistics and Performance Indicators, FY 2004

Multimodal Planning Studies

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

December 2018 Monthly Performance Report

January 2019 Monthly Performance Report

FY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission

Transform66: Inside the Beltway

NORTHERN NAPA VALLEY TRANSIT STUDY

Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council

Presentation to the DRCOG Board August 16, 2017

ROUTE 103. Morrisville Shopping Shuttle ROUTE OVERVIEW

Summary of Proposed NH 120 Service

TransAction Overview. Introduction. Vision. NVTA Jurisdictions

Marti Donley; Daniel Reese; Rodney White UPC FFY14 TIP AMD pdf

Region of Waterloo Transportation and Environmental Services Transit Services

Silver Line Operating Plan

PLEASE READ Proposal for Sustainable Service

Sarasota County Area Transit Express Bus and North Port Park and Ride

City of Palm Coast, Florida Palm Coast Safety Site Evaluation Report

LODI CITY COUNCIL Carnegie Forum 305 West Pine Street, Lodi

3. Proposed Midwest Regional Rail System

San Mateo County Transportation Authority Board Meeting November 2, 2017 Item #10 1

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

Link Union Station (LINK US)

September 2010 Service Reduction

INTERSTATE 395 EXPRESS LANES NORTHERN EXTENSION TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 2016

Development of SH119 BRT Route Pattern Alternatives for Tier 2 - Service Level and BRT Route Pattern Alternatives

ROUTE 110. St. Albans Downtown Shuttle ROUTE OVERVIEW

Fairfax County Parkway Widening Fairfax County

CHAPTER 5: Operations Plan

Update on Palm Beach MPO Funded Projects

EXHIBIT 1. BOARD AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND SUBSEQUENT ISSUANCE OF A JOINT DEVELOPMENT SOLICITATION

Fiscal Management and Control Board. Fare Policy October 16, Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only

Route 141 and I-44 Design-Build Project Community Involvement Group. March 21, 2016

July Service Change UPDATED 4/6/18

Comprehensive Operational Analysis

RELATED SANTA CLARA SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA. RELATED SANTA CLARA Santa Clara, CA

ADDISON COUNTY TRANSIT STUDY

Quality of Life Study

95 Express Lanes: Before/After Study

Horizon 1 Implementation Update

Major Projects Overview

Operational Performance

Congestion Pricing The Latest Weapon the U.S. War on Traffic Congestion. Darren Henderson, AICP

VCTC Intercity Five-Year Service Plan

Executive Summary. Introduction. Community Assessment

4 YORK REGION TRANSIT DON MILLS SUBWAY STATION ACCESS AGREEMENT

Mobile Farebox Repair Program: Setting Standards & Maximizing Regained Revenue

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

Transportation Development Plan Janesville Transit System

Transcription:

Caroline County / King George County Transit Studies Meeting November 1, 2017 1

FRED Routes C1 and C2 C1 C2 Caroline County Total FRED Total Ridership (FY 2017) 4,527 2,870 7,397 377,042 Revenue Hours 3,015 1,202 4,217 52,763 Passengers per Revenue Hour 1.5 2.4 1.8 7.1 Revenue Miles 103,782 24,555 128,337 843,508 Passengers per Revenue Mile 0.04 0.12 0.06 0.45 2

Transit Need Analysis Identify areas of high peak period and all-day transit need Identify connections needed between these areas from the travel demand model 3

Caroline Peak Period Transit Need Where Commuters Live Where the Jobs Are 4

Caroline All-Day Transit Need Where Transit- Dependent People Live Where the Services Are 5

Caroline Needed Connections Peak Period Off-Peak Periods 6

Caroline County Service Peak periods connect Ruther Glen, Ladysmith, Massaponax and Fredericksburg Based on I-95 Study potential for around 100 transit riders to NoVA/DC warrants feeder service to VRE or commuter lot Off-Peak or All Day connect Ruther Glen, Ladysmith and Massaponax Serve more non-work destinations directly, like schools and retail 7

Caroline County Preliminary Recommendations 8

Caroline County Preliminary Recommendations 9

Caroline Schedule Options Enhanced Option 1 Uses 2 vehicles, same as current C1/C2 Serves Fredericksburg on Routes 1 and 2, Spotsylvania VRE on Route 3 Enhanced Option 2 Adds a 3 rd vehicle for better headway Serves Fredericksburg on Routes 1 and 2, Spotsylvania VRE on Route 3 Saturday Service Option (Route 2 only) Peak Vehicles Annual Revenue Hours Daily Roundtrips Daily Ridership Potential Annual Operating Cost Current C1/C2 2 4,217 10 30 $289,338 Enhanced Option 1 2 6,146 10 66 $421,860 Route 3 (Spotsylvania VRE) - 1,750 2 32 $120,072 Enhanced Option 2 3 9,479 15 90 $650,388 Route 3 (Spotsylvania VRE) - 1,750 2 32 $120,072 Saturday 2 1,317 8 - $90,385 Enhanced 1 Enhanced 2 Current C1/C2 Current FRED Ridership 16,500 22,500 7,397 377,042 Revenue Hours 6,146 9,479 4,217 52,763 Passengers per Revenue Hour 2.7 2.4 1.8 7.1 Revenue Miles 149,464 224,999 128,337 843,508 Passengers per Revenue Mile 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.45 10

Caroline Schedule Options Enhanced 1-60 to 165 min headway, 1 bus Pattern Start End Pattern Start End 3 NB 4:15 AM 5:15 AM 3 SB 5:15 AM 6:15 AM 1 NB 4:45 AM 6:15 AM 1 SB 6:15 AM 7:30 AM 3 NB 6:15 AM 7:15 AM 3 SB 7:15 AM 8:15 AM 1 NB 7:30 AM 9:00 AM 1 SB 9:00 AM 10:15 AM 2 NB 10:15 AM 11:55 AM 2 SB 11:55 AM 1:25 PM 2 NB 1:25 PM 3:05 PM 2 SB 3:05 PM 4:35 PM 1 NB 4:35 PM 6:05 PM 3 SB 5:20 PM 6:20 PM 3 NB 6:20 PM 7:20 PM 1 SB 6:05 PM 7:20 PM 1 NB 7:20 PM 8:50 PM 3 SB 7:20 PM 8:20 PM 1 NB 8:20 PM 9:50 PM Saturday 90 to 100 min. headway, 2 buses Pattern Start End Pattern Start End 2 NB 9:00 AM 10:40 AM 2 SB 7:30 AM 9:00 AM 2 NB 10:30 AM 12:10 PM 2 SB 9:00 AM 10:30 AM 2 NB 12:10 PM 1:50 PM 2 SB 10:40 AM 12:10 PM 2 NB 1:40 PM 3:20 PM 2 SB 12:10 PM 1:40 PM 2 NB 3:20 PM 5:00 PM 2 SB 1:50 PM 3:20 PM 2 NB 4:50 PM 6:30 PM 2 SB 3:20 PM 4:50 PM 2 NB 6:30 PM 8:10 PM 2 SB 5:00 PM 6:30 PM 2 NB 8:00 PM 9:40 PM 2 SB 6:30 PM 8:00 PM Enhanced 2 45 to 60 min. headway, 2 buses Pattern Start End Pattern Start End 3 NB 4:15 AM 5:15 AM 3 SB 5:15 AM 6:15 AM 1 NB 4:45 AM 6:15 AM 1 SB 6:15 AM 7:30 AM 1 NB 5:30 AM 7:00 AM 1 SB 7:00 AM 8:15 AM 3 NB 6:15 AM 7:15 AM 3 SB 7:15 AM 8:15 AM 1 NB 7:30 AM 9:00 AM 1 SB 9:00 AM 10:15 AM 1 NB 8:15 AM 9:45 AM 2 SB 9:45 AM 11:15 AM 2 NB 10:15 AM 11:55 AM 2 SB 11:55 AM 1:25 PM 2 NB 11:15 AM 12:55 PM 2 SB 12:55 PM 2:25 PM 2 NB 1:25 PM 3:05 PM 2 SB 3:05 PM 4:35 PM 2 NB 2:25 PM 4:05 PM 1 SB 4:05 PM 5:20 PM 1 NB 4:35 PM 6:05 PM 3 SB 5:20 PM 6:20 PM 1 NB 5:20 PM 6:50 PM 1 SB 6:05 PM 7:20 PM 3 NB 6:20 PM 7:20 PM 3 SB 7:20 PM 8:20 PM 1 NB 7:20 PM 8:50 PM 1 NB 8:20 PM 9:50 PM 11

King George Peak Period Transit Need Where Commuters Live Where the Jobs Are 12

King George All-Day Transit Need Where Transit- Dependent People Live Where the Services Are 13

King George Needed Connections Peak Period Off-Peak Periods 14

King George County Service Peak periods connect Dahlgren, King George, Fairview Beach, and Fredericksburg Off-Peak service not yet warranted 15

King George Preliminary Recommendations 16

King George Preliminary Recommendations 17

King George Schedule Options Low: utilizes 2 buses Enhanced: utilizes 4 buses Express Option: between commuter lot and Dahlgren Peak Vehicles Annual Revenue Hours Daily Roundtrips Daily Ridership Potential Annual Operating Cost Low 1 4,833 8 75 $331,626 Enhanced 2 9,667 16 112 $663,253 Low Enhanced Current FRED Ridership 18,750 28,000 377,042 Revenue Hours 4,833 9,667 52,763 Passengers per Revenue Hour 3.9 2.9 7.1 Revenue Miles 144,219 288,439 843,508 Passengers per Revenue Mile 0.13 0.10 0.45 18

King George Schedule Options Low 2 trips, or 145 min. headway on each branch Enhanced 4 trips, or 70 min. headway on each branch Pattern Start End Pattern Start End K1 EB 5:00 AM 6:10 AM K1 WB 6:10 AM 7:25 AM K2 EB 5:30 AM 6:40 AM K2 WB 6:40 AM 7:55 AM K1 EB 7:25 AM 8:35 AM K1 WB 8:35 AM 9:50 AM K2 EB 7:55 AM 9:05 AM K2 WB 9:05 AM 10:20 AM K1 EB 1:50 PM 3:00 PM K1 WB 3:00 PM 4:15 PM K2 EB 2:10 PM 3:20 PM K2 WB 3:20 PM 4:35 PM K1 EB 4:15 PM 5:25 PM K1 WB 5:25 PM 6:40 PM K2 EB 4:35 PM 5:45 PM K2 WB 5:45 PM 7:00 PM Pattern Start End Pattern Start End K1 EB 5:00 AM 6:10 AM K1 WB 6:10 AM 7:25 AM K2 EB 5:30 AM 6:40 AM K2 WB 6:40 AM 7:55 AM K1 EB 6:15 AM 7:25 AM K1 WB 7:25 AM 8:40 AM K2 EB 6:45 AM 7:55 AM K2 WB 7:55 AM 9:10 AM K1 EB 7:25 AM 8:35 AM K1 WB 8:35 AM 9:50 AM K2 EB 7:55 AM 9:05 AM K2 WB 9:05 AM 10:20 AM K1 EB 8:40 AM 9:50 AM K1 WB 9:50 AM 11:05 AM K2 EB 9:10 AM 10:20 AM K2 WB 10:20 AM 11:35 AM K1 EB 1:50 PM 3:00 PM K1 WB 3:00 PM 4:15 PM K2 EB 2:10 PM 3:20 PM K2 WB 3:20 PM 4:35 PM K1 EB 2:35 PM 3:45 PM K1 WB 3:45 PM 5:00 PM K2 EB 3:05 PM 4:15 PM K2 WB 4:15 PM 5:30 PM K1 EB 4:15 PM 5:25 PM K1 WB 5:25 PM 6:40 PM K2 EB 4:35 PM 5:45 PM K2 WB 5:45 PM 7:00 PM K1 EB 5:00 PM 6:10 PM K1 WB 6:10 PM 7:25 PM K2 EB 5:30 PM 6:40 PM K2 WB 6:40 PM 7:55 PM 19

King George/Southeast Stafford Park and Ride Serve as commuter lot for new service and for Dahlgren vanpools Alleviate projected deficits at Fredericksburg Train Station and southeast Stafford County Several potential sites along Route 3 20

Summary Caroline County has a demonstrated need for peak and off-peak service along the Route 1 corridor Low-performing routes, but serve a need Recommendations would concentrate service in area of highest need and create efficiency 8 C1 riders/day would lose service in Bowling Green King George County has a demonstrated need for peak service between Dahlgren, King George, and Fredericksburg Populations Served by Realigned Caroline County Routes Transit-Oriented Populations Number Served Seniors 3,157 Youths 4,500 Low-Income Households 913 Zero/One-Car Households 2,541 Disabled Persons 1,829 With adequate service, ~ 1,500 potential daily trips on transit 21

Caroline/King George Next Steps Receive comments on transit need analysis and preliminary recommendations Make changes based on feedback 22