An Examination of the Effect of Multiple Supervisors on Flight Trainees' Performance

Similar documents
Assessing General Aviation Pilots' Weather Knowledge and Self-Efficacy

Evaluating GA Pilots' Interpretation of New Automated Weather Products

A Preliminary Comparison of Pilots' Weather Minimums and Actual Decision-Making

Risk Compensation in General Aviation: The Effect of Ballistic Parachute Systems

Airspace Complexity Measurement: An Air Traffic Control Simulation Analysis

The Effectiveness of JetBlue if Allowed to Manage More of its Resources

The Effects of GPS and Moving Map Displays on Pilot Navigational Awareness While Flying Under VFR

Crew Resource Management

Collision Avoidance in Traffic Patterns - Time, Flying Tasks and Visual Scanning

Study on Hotel Management Graduates Perceptions and Preferences of Jobs in Hotel Industry in Chennai City

Simulator Architecture for Training Needs of Modern Aircraft. Philippe Perey Technology Director & A350 Program Director

EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE INTEGRATION OF MIXED SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY INTO OCEANIC ATC OPERATIONS

Glass Cockpits in General Aviation Aircraft. Consequences for training and simulators. Fred Abbink

Introduction to Scenario-Based Training

Air Traffic Control Simulation Fidelity and Aircrew Training: A Field Study BRI-TR

3-D GIS Applications in Aviation and Aerospace Pedagogy Dr. Rich Snow, Dr. Mary Snow, and Mario Westphal. Abstract

Aeroplane State Awareness during Go-around (ASAGA)

Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing -- General Aviation (ASIAS -- GA)

IATA Training and Qualification Initiative (ITQI) - A Total System Approach to Training

Aviation Operations. Program Learning Outcomes. Program Description. Career Options

AN INVESTIGATION OF THE FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO PILOTS DECISIONS TO CONTINUE VISUAL FLIGHT RULES FLIGHT INTO ADVERSE WEATHER

Flight Inspection for High Elevation Airports

flightops Diminishing Skills? flight safety foundation AeroSafetyWorld July 2010

Incremental Training Effectiveness of Personal Computer Aviation Training Devices (PCATD) Used for Instrument Training

9 th USA / Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar June 14 June 17, 2011 Berlin, Germany

Turboprop Propulsion System Malfunction Recog i n titi ion on an d R d Response

SPORT PILOT TRAINING SYLLABUS

The role of Flight Data Analysis in the aircraft manufacturer s SMS.

Investigating the Safety-Relevance of Limited Distinctive Features on a Multi Remote Tower-Working Position

2.1 Private Pilot Licence (Aeroplane/Microlight)

B.S. PROGRAM IN AVIATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT Course Descriptions

Exploratory Study on Features for a PIREP Submittal Tool: Preliminary Results

UAS OPERATIONS AS AN ECOSYSTEM

Safety Syllabus. VFR into IMC

MULTIDISCIPLINARYMEETING REGARDING GLOBAL TRACKING

Evidence Based Training from a Regulator s Perspective

U.S. India Aviation Cooperation Program. Air Traffic Management Training Program Update March 2009

Semi - Annual Report. April 2, From September 21, 2003 to March 20, 2004

Logging Time on ELITE Aviation Training Devices

Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration

Introduction to Aeronautical Science ASCI 202 Embry-Riddle Classroom Course Syllabus

LESSON PLAN Introduction (3 minutes)

Flight Safety Officer Aydın Özkazanç

REPUBLIC OF KENYA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEPARTMENT OF AIR ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Airworthiness Inspector Training Profile Worksheet

AIR/GROUND SIMULATION OF TRAJECTORY-ORIENTED OPERATIONS WITH LIMITED DELEGATION

Safety Enhancement RNAV Safe Operating and Design Practices for STARs and RNAV Departures

Human Factors of Remotely Piloted Aircraft. Alan Hobbs San Jose State University/NASA Ames Research Center

RNAV Departures and STAR Operations Joint Safety Analysis and Implementation Team

FINAL REPORT BOEING B777, REGISTRATION 9V-SWH LOSS OF SEPARATION EVENT 3 JULY 2014

An Evolution in Regional Airline Training Programs

FAA NextGENProgram & NEAR Laboratory. Massood Towhidnejad, PhD Director of NEAR lab

Cross-sectional time-series analysis of airspace capacity in Europe

2018 Cathay Pacific Virtual 2 P a g e

Research on Fault Tolerant Controls within GARTEUR

Information concerning the change in the cockpit access regulation

PRIVATE PILOT STUDENT RECORD

Foundations of Aviation and Aerospace Studies ASCI 100 Embry-Riddle Classroom Course Syllabus

DEVELOPING AN ECOSYSTEM FOR UAS SAFETY 2017 WHITEPAPER SERIES

MPL Global Progress Report

Real-time route planning streamlines onboard operations, reduces fuel burn and delays, and improves on-time performance.

Identifying and Utilizing Precursors

Launching a Sub-Orbital Spacecraft

Economics of Safety Using Situational Awareness Tools

INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION WESTERN AND CENTRAL AFRICA OFFICE. Thirteenth Meeting of the FANS I/A Interoperability Team (SAT/FIT/13)

Operational Evaluation of a Flight-deck Software Application

GUERNSEY ADVISORY CIRCULARS. (GACs) UPSET PREVENTION AND RECOVERY TRAINING GAC 121/135-2

The Effect of Electronic Flight Bag Use on Pilot Performance During an Instrument Approach

Thai Airline Passengers' Opinion and Awareness on Airline Safety Instruction Card

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL COMMUNICATIONS SIMULATION AND AIRCREW TRAINING. Alfred T. Lee, Ph.D. Beta Research, Inc. Los Gatos, CA USA

TWELFTH WORKING PAPER. AN-Conf/12-WP/137. International ICAO. developing RNAV 1.1. efficiency. and terminal In line.

Discriminate Analysis of Synthetic Vision System Equivalent Safety Metric 4 (SVS-ESM-4)

Learn to Fly: Private Pilot Ground School DeCal

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION TECHNICAL CENTRE, OPP SAFDURJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI.

Syllabus Instrument Ground School 2015

Oliver Wyman 2018 Flight Operations Survey

On Demand. Fall, Spring. Spring

Follow-the-Greens: The Controllers Point of View Results from a SESAR Real Time Simulation with Controllers

Real-time Simulations to Evaluate the RPAS Integration in Shared Airspace

Evaluation of Pushback Decision-Support Tool Concept for Charlotte Douglas International Airport Ramp Operations

Aerospace Engineers. Toll-free: Tel:

VFR into IMC. Safety Syllabus

A Simulation Approach to Airline Cost Benefit Analysis

Qualification Details

NEMSPA Opportunity to Improve

Study of Demand for Light, Primary Training Aircraft in Collegiate Aviation

NZQA registered unit standard version 2 Page 1 of 9. Demonstrate flying skills for an airline transport pilot licence (aeroplane)

The Computerized Analysis of ATC Tracking Data for an Operational Evaluation of CDTI/ADS-B Technology

Advancing FTD technologies and the opportunity to the pilot training journey. L3 Proprietary

SIMULATOR TRAINING DOUBLES SOLO RATES AT THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY

ASSEMBLY 37TH SESSION

ACAS on VLJs and LJs Assessment of safety Level (AVAL) Outcomes of the AVAL study (presented by Thierry Arino, Egis Avia)

Analysis of Operational Impacts of Continuous Descent Arrivals (CDA) using runwaysimulator

Automation Dependency. Ensuring Robust Performance in Unexpected Situations Sunjoo Advani, IDT

Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing (ASIAS) ASIAS Overview. Gerardo Hueto May 2013

Flight Operations Officer Recurrent Training Syllabus

Eye-Tracking Analysis of Next Generation Air Transportation (NextGen) Taxiing and Departure Concepts

CIVIL AVIATION REGULATIONS SURINAME PART 17 - AERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS VERSION 5.0

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS): regulatory framework and challenges. NAM/CAR/SAM Civil - Military Cooperation Havana, Cuba, April 2015

Transcription:

National Training Aircraft Symposium (NTAS) 2018 - The Changing Role of the Pilot Aug 14th, 10:30 AM - 11:45 AM An Examination of the Effect of Multiple Supervisors on Flight Trainees' Performance Dongyun Yi Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, yid2@erau.edu Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/ntas Part of the Community College Leadership Commons, Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Educational Methods Commons, and the Educational Psychology Commons Yi, Dongyun, "An Examination of the Effect of Multiple Supervisors on Flight Trainees' Performance" (2018). National Training Aircraft Symposium (NTAS). 20. https://commons.erau.edu/ntas/2018/presentations/20 This Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in National Training Aircraft Symposium (NTAS) by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact commons@erau.edu.

An examination of the effect of multiple supervisors on flight trainee s performance. 2018 NTAS Presentation Dongyun Yi Instructor Pilot Embry-Riddle Aeronautical university

Research Background Overview Method Results Conclusion

Research Background

General Commercial aviation has been considered one of the safest civil transportation methods (Stolzer & Halford, 2004). Flight safety is important to maintain Impact? Safety?

Statement of the Problem Aviation Field Air Transportation General Aviation 95% of All Accident 94% Fatal Pilot Training (GA) 397 Accident Occurred during Pilot Training at Flight School (1978-2007) Mechanical Problem Skill Problem (Decision Making) Human Error = 80% Non Fatal Fatal

Significance of Study Supervisory Control System (Flight Supervisor) Safe Safe Safe Incident Incident Accident

Summary The main principle of flight activities is to maintain the conditions for safe flying. Human error is the major contributing factor in most flight disasters (Lestiani, Yudoko, Yassierli, & Puboyo, 2017). A consistent level of supervision is need for guide pilots to stay within acceptable range of flight performance parameters. According to Heinrich, The supervisor or foreman is the key man in accident prevention (1959, p. 242).

History Supervision: investigating all events to determine uncovered causes, inspecting regularly to uncover hazard, coaching people in the field to let them know how to work safely, and motivating people to work safely Control Earlier Social Structure Through settling labor time control Industrial Society Modern Society Through disciplinary action Through electronically monitor

History

Theory Stress / Arousal & Psychological Stress Stress (Strong Stimuli) & Arousal (Mood) Physical Stress: Physical cause Psychological Stress: threat although there is no actual physical harm (Examples-Me)

Theory Eustress (Positive Stress) (Kirby et al. s Rat study, 2013) (Rogers, Smith, & Sainfort, 1990) Figure 1. Inverted-U model by Yerkes-Dodson s Law is adapted from The Relation of Strength of Stimulus to Rapidity of Habit-Formation (1908). Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, 459-482.

Method

Hypothesis IV & DV & Flight Performance Null Hypothesis (H 01 ): Flight trainees performance would not increase under the condition of three supervisors compared to a single supervisor. IV: The presence of supervisor (1 vs 3) DV: Flight performance (3) Flight Performance Breakdown (3) : Skills, Scanning, and Workload

Research Approach Purpose & Performance Measurement Purpose To examine whether the number of flight supervisors influenced flight trainees performance. Flight Performance Measurement Skill (Heading & Airspeed) Scanning Time Workload(Stress) Deviation from Assigned Time Took to Notice (Sec) NASA TLX Subtest

Research Design Participant s Demographic Profile: No Test (Correlation Test X) Normality Test: Shapiro-Wilk s Test (Small Sample Size) X=Y X Y Skill (Airspeed/Heading): Wilcoxon s Signed Rank Test (Within, Non-Parametric) Relationship between Skill and Order of Flight Supervisor: Mann-Whitney Test (Between, Non-Parametric) Scanning Time (X/Y): Independent Sample T-Test (Between, Parametric) Reliability Test of Workload Scale: Cronbach s α (NASA-TLX, 6Q) Workload (Stress): Paired Sample T-Test (Within, Parametric) X=Y Relationship between Workload (Stress) and Order of Flight Supervisor: Independent Sample T-Test (Between, Parametric) Interaction Effect on Workload (Stress) between Number of Supervisor and Order: Repeated Measures ANOVA (Between & Within, Parametric)

Participants ERAU Flight Students 32

Materials and Apparatus Hardware / Software Software Microsoft Flight Simulator X Version Hardware ELITE Pro Panel which located at CERTS Lab, Room 131 in the College of Aviation building of Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.

Materials and Apparatus Demographic Questionnaire / NASA TLX Demographic Questionnaire NASA TLX

Materials and Apparatus Pre-Recorded Flight Supervisors Video 1 Supervisor Video 3 Supervisors Video

Materials and Apparatus Experiment Scenarios / Procedure Experimental Scenario X: Participants were asked to perform an experimental task for the predetermined Scenario X. Participants started their flights in midair at about 1500 feet and 3 nautical miles high from the final approach to runway 7L at Daytona Beach International Airport. As soon as the participants started flying, their performance was measured by the external flight data saving system Flight Data Recorder (FDR), which recorded airspeed, heading, and altitude. The air traffic controller voices were simulated and automated traffic was included. Experimental Scenario Y: Participants were asked to perform an experimental task in predetermined Scenario Y. The participants started in the middle of a cruising flight at about 3000 feet in Daytona airspace. As soon as the participants started flying, their flying performance was measured by the external flight data saving system FDR Recording, which recorded airspeed, heading, and altitude. The air traffic controller s voice was simulated and a trim malfunction was included.

Materials and Apparatus SPSS Raw Data SPSS Result

Results

Participant s Skill 1 Flight Supervisor vs 3 Flight Supervisor

Scanning Time 1 Flight Supervisor vs 3 Flight Supervisor

Workload & Stress 1 Flight Supervisor vs 3 Flight Supervisor

Workload & Stress By Order and Interaction Effect

Conclusion

Conclusion Flight Trainees Skill Airspeed Heading Airspeed Deviation was lower with 3 Flight Supervisor Complex Control Improvement Stress Increase, Performance Increase Heading Deviation did not Change Heading is Less Complex to Control Less Stress, Original Flying Skill Supports Hypothesis 3 Participants Did Not Support Hypothesis

Conclusion Flight Trainees Scanning Time Scenario X Scenario Y Detection Time Decreased with 3 Flight Supervisors Lower Detection Time, Better Situational Awareness, and Scanning Ability Improvement in Complicated Situation (Inside & Outside) Increased Flight Performance Supports Hypothesis Detection Time Decreased with 3 Flight Supervisors Lower Detection Time, Better Situational Awareness, and Scanning Ability Improvement Ability in Emergency Situations, Fowling Assigned Rules Increased Flight Performance Supports Hypothesis

Conclusion Flight Trainees Workload & Stress Workload Workload Level Increased with 3 Flight Supervisors Medium Workload Increased=Good (Complex) Workload Supports Hypothesis Stress Stress Level Increased with 3 Flight Supervisors Medium Stress Increased=Good (Complex) Supports Hypothesis

Recommendations Limitations Current Research Study Larger Sample Size (More than 300) Under Real Supervisors Future Research Study Follow-up Study with Based on School s Populations Find Standard Ratio (Number of Trainees vs Flight Supervisors) For Other Flight Schools, Univ, Airline, and Aviation Industry Implement the Flight Supervisory System (with Multiple Flight Supervisors) Increase Flight Supervisors from Small to Larger Number Specific Range of Sample Find Exact Number of Flight Supervisors Needed Implement Airline Operation Center like Flight Supervisory Control System

An examination of the effect of multiple supervisors on flight trainee s performance. Ladies and Gentleman, Thank you for your attention Any Questions? 2018 NTAS Presentation Dongyun Yi Instructor Pilot Embry-Riddle Aeronautical university