Tourist Statistical Report 2012 and 2013

Similar documents
Tourism Statistics Annual Report

Tourism Statistics

5th NAMIBIA TOURISM SATELLITE ACCOUNT. Edition

Travel and Tourism in Ukraine: Key Trends and Opportunities to 2016

FALKLAND ISLANDS International Tourism Statistics Report 2012

STATISTICAL BULLETIN ON INTERNATIONAL ARRIVALS, DEPARTURES AND MIGRATION 2011 SERIES NO. SDT: Government of Tonga

TABLE OF CONTENTS. TOURIST EXPENDITURE 31 Average Spend per Person per Night ( ) 31 Tourist Expenditure per Annum ( ) 32

Sources of Information

Baku, Azerbaijan November th, 2011

Digest of International Travel and Tourism Statistics 2017

Tourism in South Africa A statistical overview

Tourism in numbers

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

FOREWORD KEY HIGHLIGHTS... 3

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Domestic Tourism to South West Wales in 2006, 2007 and 2008 Factsheet

Domestic Tourism Survey 2016

Understanding Business Visits

Putting Museums on the Tourist Itinerary: Museums and Tour Operators in Partnership making the most out of Tourism

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Estimates of the Economic Importance of Tourism

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Tourism Towards 2030

From: OECD Tourism Trends and Policies Access the complete publication at: Mexico

Domestic Tourism Statistics in India

Tourism Performance Summary Q

Presented by: Ms. Kanageswary Ramasamy Department of Statistics, Malaysia February 2017

HEATHROW COMMUNITY NOISE FORUM

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Cape Winelands. Regional Tourism Visitor Trends Jan-July Overview. Western Cape

Prospects for international tourism

An Evaluation of the impact

Kent Visitor Economy Barometer 2016

I T N E T R E N R A N T A I T ON O AL A L A R A R R I R VA V L A S L S A N A D N D D E D PA

Demand perspective: Measuring flows of visitors/ trips/ expenditure and their characterization in each form of tourism

Netherlands. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

Visit Wales Research Update

The United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism TOURISM DIVISION The 2013 Tourism Statistical Bulletin

The Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011

From: OECD Tourism Trends and Policies Access the complete publication at:

Commissioned by: Economic Impact of Tourism. Stevenage Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Tourism to the Regions of Wales 2008

PERFORMANCE MEASURE INFORMATION SHEET #16

Economic Impact of Tourism. Hertfordshire Results. Commissioned by: Visit Herts. Produced by:

Tourism Performance Report Q1 2018

National Accounts Workshop for SADC countries

Status of Compilation of Tourism Satellite Accounts for India

Report on the Namibia Tourist Exit Survey

Annual International Arrivals & Accommodation Statistics

The Economic Impact of Tourism Eastbourne Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Structure of presentation

International Visitation to the Northern Territory. Year ending September 2017

STATISTICAL BULLETIN ON MONTHLY MIGRATION STATISTICS DECEMBER 2016 SERIES NO. SDT: 39-M 55. Government of Tonga

The Role of Gauteng in South Africa s Backpacking Economy

Domestic Visitation to the Northern Territory

International Visitation to the Northern Territory. Year ending December 2017

The Economic Impact of Tourism New Forest Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The results of the National Tourism Development Strategy Assessments

SERIES NO. SDT: Government of Tonga

INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL AND TOURISM

GUYANA TOURISM STATISTICAL DIGEST 2015

The contribution of Tourism to the Greek economy in 2017

TSA GOVERNANCE AT NATIONAL LEVEL / CZECH REPUBLIC. Pavel Vančura

BUSINESS BAROMETER December 2018

December Release Date February 2015 Hotel Price Index

AUCKLAND DESTINATION OVERVIEW

Concept, Method, Challenges. Jürgen Weiß. MA in Tourism Economics (University of applied Sciences Vienna)

Statistical Bulletin: No: 13/2016

Measuring travel services and tourism in New Zealand. October 2013

UNDERSTANDING TOURISM: BASIC GLOSSARY 1

Main indicators kept growing

DOMESTIC TOURISM SURVEY (DTS) : MALAYSIA S EXPERIENCE

2016 Edition. Lesotho Tourism Development Corporation. July Page of 39

UNWTO Workshop on Developing Tourism Statistics and the Tourism Satellite Account Project Cebu, Philippines, October, 2008

Methodology and coverage of the survey. Background

Hotel. Price Index. November Released Date: January Hotel Price Index

ANNEXURE A Terminology and definitions

Sweden. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

AUCKLAND DESTINATION OVERVIEW

From: OECD Tourism Trends and Policies Access the complete publication at: Japan

TOURIST ARRIVAL: QUARTERLY REPORT

Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County September 2016

Chile. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

South Australian Tourism Industry Council SA Tourism Barometer March Quarter 2015

Destination Visitor Survey Strategic Regional Research Queensland: Understanding the Queensland Touring Group

The regional value of tourism in the UK: 2013

SADC Harmonised Consumer Price Indices (HCPI) September 2017

Tourism in Alberta. A Summary Of Visitor Numbers, Revenue & Characteristics Research Resolutions & Consulting Ltd.

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Jacksonville, FL. June 2016

Tourism Snapshot. A focus on the markets in which the CTC and its partners are active. February 2015 Volume 11, Issue 2.

Austria. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

Oct-17 Nov-17. Sep-17. Travel is expected to grow over the coming 6 months; at a slightly faster rate

49 May-17. Jun-17. Travel is expected to grow over the coming 6 months; at a slower rate

Improving Statistical Capacities of Tourism in Turkey

Steep increases in overnight stays and revenue

Transcription:

Tourist Statistical Report 212 and 213 October 214

Produced by the Directorate of Tourism Private Bag 1336 Levinson Arcade Capital Centre Building, 4th floor Windhoek, Namibia Tel +264 61 284233/2259 Fax: + 664 61 236692/24193 Website: www.met.gov.na Emails: sts@met.na and anambahu@met.na With funding from the Millennium Challenge Corporation through the Millennium Challenge Account - Namibia i

Table of Contents Foreword... iii Acknowledgements... v 1. Introduction... 2 2. Trends of Foreign Arrivals for the Past Four Years... 5 3. Top Ten Tourist Markets, 212-213... 7 4. Top Ten Overseas Holiday Tourist Arrivals, 212-213... 9 5. Trend of Tourist Arrivals over time, 29-213... 1 6. Evolution of Tourist Arrivals by Region, 29-213... 12 7. Tourist Arrivals by Purpose of Visit... 8. Overseas Tourist Arrivals by Purpose of Visit, 213... 17 9. Interest Tourist Markets by Purpose of Visit... 18 1. Tourists Intended Length of Stay, 212-213... 18 11. Age Profile of Tourists, 212-213... 19 12. Gender Profile of Tourists, 212-213... 22 13. Point of Entry for Tourists, 212-213... 23 14. Mode of Travel for Tourists... 24 15. Seasonality of Travel for Tourists... 25. Hotel Statistics... 26 Conclusion and Recommendations... 27 Conclusion... 27 Recommendations... 27 Annexure... 29 ii

Foreword The tourism industry is recognised by the Government of the Republic of Namibia (GRN) as an important contributor to the growth of the country s economy, employment creation, rural development, poverty reduction, investments and foreign exchange earnings. Tourism is a catalyst for development and it is also applauded for its contribution to national and regional unity. Over the last ten years, Namibia has gained increased regional and global recognition as a premier adventure, culture and wildlife tourism destination in Africa. It has solidified its global reputation as a leader in conservation. Global decision makers and tour operators are now proudly sharing Namibia s conservation initiatives, landscapes, iconic and less known tourism products in their networks thus increasing the potential for global sales of the country s tourism products. Over the past two years, tourist arrivals to Namibia have steadily increased and it is forecasted that international tourist arrivals will increase more in years to come. Concerted marketing efforts in key source markets, as well as the 213 Adventure Travel World Summit (ATWS) held in Namibia in 213 have contributed to the increase in tourism arrivals. The ATWS 213 was the first to be held in Africa and more adventure travel industry members attended than in previous years, making Namibia s Summit the largest ever. Team Destination Namibia promised a Summit never to be forgotten and they delivered on their promise. In 213, Namibia also hosted the 11 th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. These world class events also positioned Namibia as a premier destination for various business as well as leisure activities. The hosting of the ATWS summit, in particular, has galvanized and synergised the tourism sector with both the government and public to advance the process of spreading benefits from tourism geographically. The GRN, nongovernmental organisations and many members of the private sector have already recognised the need for tourism development that preserves the delicate eco-system, to be available for use not just for now, but also into the future. To build on these positive trends, Namibia needs to continue to innovatively and proactively market the country in key source markets. We must identify niche interests and create compelling products that compete on a global level. Our training programs need to prepare young men and women to deliver on the promises that our marketing makes to tourists. The Namibian tourism sector does not stand alone; collaboration between the public and private partners in various spheres has reached new heights as we work closely together in ensuring that tourism s immense benefits reach the most vulnerable groups of society while supporting the preservation of our cultural rich and abundant resources. Tourism is truly everyone s business. We wish all stakeholders fruitful reading. Hon. Uahekua Herunga, MP Minister of Environment and Tourism iii

iv

Acknowledgements The Ministry of Environment and Tourism would like to thank the Millennium Challenge Account Namibia for technical assistance, the Ministry of Home Affairs and Immigration and Namibia Tourism Board for availing arrival/departure forms and hotel occupancy statistics. Lastly, the Ministry would like to thank all the stakeholders who contributed toward the refining of this report during the stakeholder s consultative meeting held at Nampower Convention Centre on the 14 September 214. v

Executive Summary Foreign Arrivals 1,372,62 (213) Tourists 1,372,62 (86%) Same-day visitors 151,1 (11%) Returning Residents 24,734 (2%) Visiting Friends/Relatives 583,867 (49.6%) Business 147,22(12.5%) Holiday 422,157 (35.9%) Others 22,996 (2%) Tourist arrivals to Namibia 9.% increase from 212 to 213 5.% increase from 211 to 212 Top Ten Tourist Markets,,,,,, United Kingdom, United States,, Other purposes 2,727 (2%) Tourist arrivals to Namibia from North America 7.7% increase of tourists from North America from 212 to 213 6.4% increase from 211 to 212 Tourist arrivals to Namibia from 7% increase from 212 to 213 45% increase from 211 to 212 Top Ten Overseas Holiday Tourist Markets Purpose of Visit, All Tourists 49% Visiting Friends and Relatives 34% Holiday 12% Business 2% Other Average Intended Length of Stay 19 days for Visiting friends and relatives 18 days for Holiday Tourists 8 days for Business Tourists, United States, United Kingdom,,,,,,, Purpose of Visit, Overseas Tourists 22% of all tourists 73% are holiday tourists 14% are visiting friends and relatives tourists 6% are business tourists Age Profile of Tourists 52% under 4 years 48% are 4 years and above Age of Overseas Tourists Gender Of Tourists 63% Male 37% Female Most Popular Posts of Entry of Tourists to Namibia 31% Northern Border Posts 24% Hosea Kutako Internanional Airport 2% North Eastern Border Posts 14% Southern Border Posts Seasonality of Travel for Tourists 42% came between May-September 31% came between January-April 27% came between October-December 67% are 4 years and above for European Tourists 62% are 4 years and above for North America Tourists Most Mode of Travel for Tourists to Namibia 72% use Road 27% use Air Bed Occupancy Rate 36% in 213 29% in 212 1

1. Introduction Background and Objectives The Ministry of Environment and Tourism started publishing the Annual Report on Tourist Arrivals Statistics in 21. The main objective of the report is to provide timely quality data on tourism arrivals to Namibia for the benefit of stakeholders of the tourism sector as well as other relevant sectors. This publication provides the 212 and 213 tourist arrivals statistics which can be used for planning, budgeting, and evaluation of tourism programmes and projects as well as for general use purposes. The key users of tourism statistics includes various ministries of the Government of the Republic of Namibia as well as the Namibia Tourism Board (NTB), the Bank of Namibia, the National Planning Commission, the Federation of Namibia Tourism Association (FENATA) and all its members, research institutions, non-governmental organisations, donors, universities and the general public. How to use this Report The report contains two main parts. The first part presents key results and trend analyses presented mostly in graphical form. The key results are presented under 11 topics, including: foreign tourist category, e.g., same-day visitors, returning residents, other purposes; the top ten tourists markets; the evolution of tourist arrivals; the purpose of entry of tourist, such as holiday, visiting friends and relatives, business; intended length of stay by tourist category; the age and gender profile of Namibia s tourists; the port of entry for tourists visiting Namibia; the mode of travel to Namibia; the season when most tourists visit Namibia; and accommodation. The second part, Annex 1, provides detailed statistical tables covering all the topics above for those who are interested in looking into details and making their own analyses. Key Concepts and Definitions Foreign Tourist A foreign tourist is defined as any visitor travelling to a country other than that of his/ her residence but outside his/her usual environment for more than 1 night but less than 12 months and whose main purpose of visit is other than the exercise of an activity remunerated from within the place visited. This is the United Nations World Tourism Organisation (UNWTO) definition and it is used to produce foreign tourist arrival statistics in Namibia. The use of this broad concept makes it possible to identify both tourists (overnight visitors) and same-day visitors. Purpose of Visit The main purpose of a tourism trip to a country (or place) is defined as the purpose in the absence of which the trip would not have taken place. It is determined by the main activities in which the visitor has been or will be involved during the trip at the destination. The main purpose of visit for tourists is classified under 4 categories which are Visiting Friends/Relatives, Holiday, Business, and Other (those reasons that do not fall under the other three categories). Duration of visit 2

The duration of a visit (stay or trip) is measured in the following units: the number of hours for same-day visits, and nights for staying visits. For international tourism the duration is measured either in terms of time spent in the receiving country for inbound tourism, or time away from the usual residence for outbound tourism. Country of residence The country of residence is one of the key criteria for determining whether a person arriving in a country is a visitor or other traveller, and if a visitor, whether s/he is a national or overseas resident. The underlying concept in the classification of international visitors by place of origin is the country of residence, not their nationality. Foreign nationals residing in a country are assimilated with other residents for the purpose of domestic and outbound tourism statistics. The above definitions and classifications, being internationally accepted, allow for global comparison of Namibia s tourism statistics. 3

Methodology Forms are collected from 2 Border posts, 1 airports and 3 seaports on a quarterly basis by MET Officials Entry and Exit Points All Departure and Arrival Forms Sorting by interns Departure forms are set aside Departure Forms Arrival Forms Sorting by interns Forms completed by Namibians are set aside Namibian Arrival Forms Foreign Arrival Forms Sampling A stratified sampling method is used and a sample size of 54,885 out 1,372,62 was selected for 213. Key variables used are entry points, months and nationality Coding Data entry Verification & Cleaning Manually entered into CSPro and exported to Weighting & Analysis Draft Report SPSS Stakeholders consultation workshop Final Report 4

2. Trends of Foreign Arrivals for the Past Four Years From all foreign arrivals to Namibia in 213, tourist arrivals constitute the largest number, followed by same-day visitors. Returning residents and other purpose of visits has been constantly lower over the past four years with minor differences. Foreign arrivals to Namibia in 213 totalled to 1,374,62 of which tourist arrivals amounted to 1,176,42, representing 86% of all foreign arrivals. These numbers are up from 1,3,439 foreign arrivals in 212, of which 1,78,937 were tourists. Most of the arrivals making up over one half of all foreign arrivals to Namibia come from and, and 4 persons out of every 5 visitors were tourists. A significant proportion of ns were same-day visitors, representing about 2 persons out of every 5 ns visiting Namibia. Figure 1: Foreign Arrivals by Category, 21-213 5

Figure 2: Who visited Namibia in 213? 6

3. Top Ten Tourist Markets, 212-213 The overall market for tourists to Namibia in 213 was led by followed by and in third place. These patterns are the same for 212 tourist arrivals. Figure 3a: Top Ten Tourist Markets for 213 7

Figure 3b: Top Ten Tourist Markets for 213 8

4. Top Ten Overseas Holiday Tourist Arrivals, 212-213 Overall overseas holiday tourist arrivals amounted to 187,64 in 213, up from 181,83 in 212 and 176,857 in 211. The top ten overseas holiday tourist arrivals to Namibia have been led by and United Kingdom for several years up until 212. In 213, it is observed that United States has taken over the second position from the United Kingdom while took the 8th position in 213, up from the 13th position in 212 (see figures below). Figure 4: Top Ten Overseas Holiday Tourist Arrivals for 213 Figure 5: Top Ten Overseas Holiday Tourist Arrivals for 212 9

5. Trend of Tourist Arrivals over time, 29-213 Despite the world economic crises in 28-29, tourist arrivals to Namibia have continuously increased over the last 5 years. Figure 6: Trend of Tourist Arrivals over the past 5 years. 1

Tourist arrivals have increased by 9.% from 212 to 213 and by 5.% from 211 to 212. The increase of tourist arrivals in 212 and 213 is possibly due to major Government and private sector interventions in the tourism sector. Figure 7: Time series presentation of tourist arrivals, 21-213 11

6. Evolution of Tourist Arrivals by Region, 29-213 Tourist arrivals from Africa have increase by 1 between 212 and 213. An increase of 5.4% was recorded between 211 and 212. Tourists from Africa constituted the largest number of all tourists (78% in 213); however this proportion decreases when it comes to holiday tourists (56%). These proportions have been in the similar range for a decade. Figure 8: Tourist Arrivals from Africa, 29-213 12

Tourist arrivals from North America ( and ) amounted to 26,1 and have significantly increased from 212 to 213. It is worth noting that among all tourist arrivals from North America, 89% were holiday tourists in 213 and 71% in 212. Figure 9: Tourist Arrivals from North America, 29-213 13

Tourist arrivals from Europe have slightly increased since 211 but yet did not reached its level of 21. The increase was only from 212 to 213 and from 211 to 212. However, tourist arrivals from United Kingdom have increased by 1% from 212 to 213, while those from have remained more or less at the same level. Figure 1: Tourist Arrivals from Europe, 29-213. 14

Chinese tourist arrivals increased by 7% from 212 to 213 and by 45% from 211 to 212. Details in annex tables show that a similar increase of 54% was also observed from 212 to 213 for holiday tourists. Figure 11: Tourist Arrivals from, 28-213 15

7. Tourist Arrivals by Purpose of Visit Tourists are classified into four categories, namely: holiday tourists, visiting friends and relatives, business tourists, and other purpose tourists. Among all tourists visiting Namibia, visiting friends and relatives were the largest number followed by holiday tourists. Detailed results show that n holiday tourists dominated the African tourist markets where 3 persons out of 1 tourists were holiday tourists and n tourists came second with 2 persons out of every 1 tourists being holiday tourists. Figure 12: Tourist Arrivals by Purpose of Visit, 211-213 Tourist Arrivals by Purpose of Visit 414,29 411,398 43,273 Holiday 423,251 463,456 Visiting Friends/ Relatives 572,499 123,237 142,584 14,665 Business 66,451 31,714 22,195 Other - Tourists 211 2, 4, Tourists 212 6, 8, Tourists 213

8. Overseas Tourist Arrivals by Purpose of Visit, 213 Tourists from overseas were more likely to be holiday makers as compared to tourists from African countries who are more likely to be visiting friends and relatives. Namibia also attracts a significant number of tourists visiting for business purposes from African countries as compared to overseas countries. Figure 14: Overseas Tourist Arrivals by Purpose of Visit Figure 13: Tourist Arrivals from Africa by Purpose of Visit Over 7 persons out of every 1 European tourists were leisure tourists and 9 persons out of every 1 North America tourists were leisure tourists. Most of the remaining tourists from North America other than holiday tourists came for business purposes. Figure : European Tourist Arrivals Figure 15: North America Tourist Arrivals 17

9. Interest Tourist Markets by Purpose of Visit,,, and are seen as interest tourist markets1 to Namibia. Apart from and, the three other countries dominate in visiting friends and relatives tourist markets to Namibia with above 5% of tourist arrivals to Namibia. Interest Tourist Arrival Markets by Purpose of Entry, 213 Visiting Friends/ Relatives Interest Tourist Markets Holiday Business Other 111,58 92,641 298,393 13,35 63,569 17,179 28,818 7,97 2,26 4,58 66,714 17,41,692 17,853 3,26 6,769 7,241 1,353 1,987 45 277,182 426,25 98,792 56,566 9,91 24.1% 4.%.9% 3 3 2.4% 3.5% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Numbers Percentages 1. 4 7 64.3% 5 22.8% 33.4% 24.3% 17.4% 14.% 46.2% Tourists Intended Length of Stay, 212-213 Figure 15: Length of stay for Tourists Tourists' Intended Length of Stay by Purpoer of Visit, 212213 2 15 1 5 Visiting Friends/ Relatives Holiday/ Tourists 213 1 Other purposes Business/ Conference and Professionals The average intended length of stay in Namibia of all tourists was 17 days in 213 and days in 212. Of all 213 tourists, those visiting friends and relatives intend to stay longer than holiday tourists and business tourists. The pattern of intended length of stay by purpose of visit is similar in 212. 212 Interest Tourist Markets were identified by the Namibia tourism sector due to the volume of foreign arrivals coming from these markets. 18

Figure : Average intended length of stay for selected markets Of the Top Ten Tourist Markets, tourists from were likely to spend the most days that can reach an average of one month per visit. Tourists from also intended to stay an average of 19 days, and those from and intended to stay an average of over 15 days. Average Intended Length of Stay of Top Ten Tourist Markets, 212-213 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 The tourists coming from and were likely to stay fewer days than others. 212 11. Tourists from,, and intended to stay an average of 15 days. 213 Age Profile of Tourists, 212-213 Figure 17: Age of Tourists The majority of tourists that came to Namibia in 213 were in the age groups of 3-39 and 4-49 representing 26% and 22% respectively. Although the 229 age group represented 18% of all tourists, the elder age groups 5-59 and 6+ also were well represented with 15% and 11% respectively. Age of Tourists, 212 & 213 3% 25% 2% 15% 1% 5% % - 19 2-29 3-39 212 4-49 5-59 6+ 213 19

Figure 18: Age of African Tourist Age of African Tourists, 212-213 28% 29% 22% 23% 21% 2% 9% 12% 13% 8% - 19 2-29 3-39, 212 4-49 5-59 6% 7% 6+ The age profile of African tourists was very similar to the one of overall tourists as shown above with the difference that elder age groups were less represented. It is clear that tourists arriving from other African countries to Namibia were young, with half of them being less than 39 years old., 213 Figure 19: Age group of European Tourists Contrary to African tourists travelling to Namibia, European tourists were much more represented in the elder age-groups of 6+ and 5-59. Out of every 1 European tourists travelling to Namibia, 5 were at least 5 years old; this age structure indicates that the majority of European tourists were leisure tourists. European tourists aged 4 years and above represented 67% of all European tourists travelling to Namibia. Age of European Tourists, 212-213, 212, 213 3% 25% 2% 15% 1% 5% % - 19 2-29 3-39 4-49 5-59 6+ 2

Figure 2: Age of North American Tourist Age of North American Tourists, 212-213 35% Similarly to European tourists, the age profile of tourists from North America ( and ) shows that the dominant age groups were 6+ and 5-59. The half of all tourists from North America were aged 5 and above and 3 tourists out of every 5 were at least 4 years old. 3% 25% 2% 15% 1% 5% % - 19 2-29 3-39, 212 4-49 5-59 6+, 213 21

12. Gender Profile of Tourists, 212-213 Figure 21: Gender of Tourists by region, 213 The gender profile of tourists travelling to Namibia in 213 shows an unbalanced structure of males and women. Gender of tourists by region, 213 All Tourists 63% 37% 68% 6% 4% 58% 42% 64% % 2% 36% 4% Male Of a total of 1,176,42 tourists who visited Namibia in 213, 6 persons out of every 1 tourists were male. 32% 6% 8% 1% Female Figure 22: Gender of Tourists by region, 212 Gender of Tourists, 212 ALL TOURISTS 62% NORTH AMERICA 38% 66% 34% 52% 48% 56% 44% 63% Male The age structure of tourists travelling to Namibia in 212 is similar to the one of 213 above with the exception of tourists from North America where the gender imbalance was not significant. 37% Female 22

13. Point of Entry for Tourists, 212-213 The most popular points of entry used by tourists visiting Namibia in 213 were the northern border posts, Hosea Kutako International Airport, the north-eastern border posts and the southern border posts. The northern border posts are mostly used by tourists from, which as previously stated is the leading tourism market for Namibia. Hosea Kutako is the main international airport and was used by the majority of international tourists. The southern border posts were mostly used by n tourists travelling to Namibia, while north eastern border posts were mostly used by n and n tourists visiting Namibia. While over half of the tourists from Europe and North America visited Namibia came through Hosea Kutako International Airport, only 12% of n and 2% of n tourists travelling to Namibia used this entry point. Figure 25: Point of Entry for Tourists, 213 Figure 23: Point of Entry for Tourists, 212 Point of Entry for Tourists, 213 Northern Border Posts 3 Hosea Kutako Airport 23.7% Point of Entry for Tourists, 212 TransOther Eros Airport Airports Kalahari 3.6% Border Posts 7.5% North Eastern Border Posts 19.6% Southern Border Posts 14.4% Northern Border Posts 3 TransEros Other Airport Airports Kalahari 3.5% Border Posts 8.3% North Eastern Border Posts 17.% Hosea Kutako Airport 24.4% Southern Border Posts 15.5% 23

14. Mode of Travel for Tourists Figure 27: Mode of Travel for Tourists The most used mode of travel for tourists travelling to Namibia is by land, driven by the top two tourist markets, and, from which Namibia in reachable by road. Thus, they influenced significantly the structure of the mode of travel for all tourists. Mode of Travel for Tourists 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % 211 212 Road Air 213 Other Figure 24: Mode of Travel by region Most tourists from Europe, North America and regions other than Africa travelled to Namibia by air; this accounted for 6 persons out of every 1 tourists. On the other hand, 83% of African tourists travelling to Namibia arrived by road, and 98% of them came from bordering countries. Mode of Travel of Tourists from different regions 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % Air Road Other 24

15. Seasonality of Travel for Tourists Figure 25: Tourist Arrivals by Months Overall tourist arrivals as well as tourists from Africa showed a peak in December. Number of Tourist Arrivals by Month, 213 12 Overseas tourists increased from June and reached the highest number in August and October before decreasing in December. It is worth noting that the peak month for tourists from North America in 213 was September. 1 8 6 4 2 OVERSEAS ALL TOURISTS Figure 26: Tourist Arrivals by Season Regardless the region of origin, the greatest number of tourists visited Namibia between May-September which accounted for 42% of all tourists travelling to Namibia in 213. Of all overseas tourists this season accounted for 45%. Number of tourist arrivals by season, 213 Overseas Africa All Tourists 1,2, 1,, 519,984 8, 6, 359,594 296,464 4, 2, 45,248 29,369 69,225 217,243 114,735 79,221 Jan-Apr May-Sept Oct-Dec 25

. Hotel Statistics Figure 27: Average Bed Occupancy Rate, 28-213 In 213, the average bed occupancy rate was higher than the one for all previous years since 28. It has increased by 7% as compared to 212 and 211. This increase can be justified by the high increase of tourist arrivals observed in 213. Bed Occupancy Rate 36% 4% 35% 3% 25% 2% 15% 1% 5% % 32% 31% 28 29 28% 29% 29% 21 211 212 213 Figure 28: Bed Occupancy Rate by Months 5% 45% 4% 35% 3% 25% 2% 21 211 212 Dec Nov Oct Sept Aug July June May April March Feb 15% Jan The bed occupancy rate reached its peak in August. This peak month is observed over the past four years. Other months with notable increases in the bed occupancy rate were April and November. 213 26

Conclusion and Recommendations Conclusion The total number of foreign arrivals to Namibia in 213 was 1,372,62 up from 1,3,439 in 212. Of all foreign arrivals to Namibia in 213, 86% were tourists (1,176,42), 11% were same-day visitors, 2% were returning residents and other purpose of visit. The top ten tourism markets in those years were,,,,,, United Kingdom, United States,, and. There has been a significant 9% increase of tourist arrivals in 213 as compared to 212, up from 5% in 212 as compared to 211. This increase may be a result from Government of Namibia as well as private sector and other partners interventions in the tourism sector. This increase is mainly made up of the increase of tourists visiting Namibia from Africa and North America. It is also worth noting that tourists from have significantly increased during the same period. Of all tourists, 49.9% entered Namibia to visit friends and relatives, 35.9% were leisure tourists, and 12.5% and 2%, respectively, were business tourists and other purpose of visit. This trend was driven by African tourists, who make up the bulk of all tourists. However, 73% of overseas tourists who represented 22% of all tourist arrivals in 213 were leisure tourists while only 14% came for visiting friends and relatives and 6% were business tourists. The average intended length of stay was 18 days for leisure tourists, 19 days for visiting friends and relatives tourists and 8 days for business tourists. Recommendations The registered performance of the tourism sector in 213 has to be sustained by maintaining the already existing tourism infrastructure and tourism markets. In addition, stakeholders in the tourism sector should continue innovating new tourism products in order to continuously attract each category of tourists. Based on the process of compiling tourist arrivals statistics, there have been delays in producing and publishing annual tourist arrivals statistics report over time. Given the importance of producing timely tourist arrivals statistics for policy formulation and planning Namibia s development, it is crucial that a quarterly bulletin and annual report on tourist arrivals be published within three months after the end of the reporting period. In order to maintain the timely publication of tourist arrivals statistics, all stakeholders should work hand in hand to ensure that: A sustainable institutional arrangement is in place to facilitate the entire process of the compilation of and reporting on tourist arrivals, from the collection of forms through to sampling, data entry, data cleaning and report writing. Three institutions need be most involved in this process, namely the Ministry of Environment and Tourism, the Ministry of Home Affairs and Immigration and the Namibia Statistics Agency. The data from different sources of tourism statistics should be triangulated and summarized in a single annual document highlighting key indicators to easily inform decision-making. Some examples of potential sources are the Namibia Tourist Exit Survey, Tourist Satellite Account, Hotel Statistics, World Tourism Barometer First National Bank Tourism Index, and Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Index. The arrival/departure form should be revised to facilitate incorporation of needed tourism variables in the computerised system of Ministry of Home Affairs and Immigration2. With time, data captured from this 2 out of 32 border posts are computerised according to Ministry of Home Affairs and Immigration 27

computerised system will be used to produce needed tourist arrivals statistics and the sampling approach will be abandoned. Verification of arrival/departure forms during the sorting, sampling and data entry process revealed that there are some questions included in the arrival/departure form which are not filled in by travellers and one should assess whether these should remain on the form and be better enforced or be removed from the form. Examples of these are: (11) Number of accompanying children under the age of ; (17) Visitors to Namibia, kindly state the amount of money you intend to spend during your visit (excluding fare to and from Namibia). 28

Annexure Table 1. Number of Foreign Arrivals by Nationality, 25-213 % Change 213 /212 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 77,866 81,745 86,46 869,93 929,63 885,584 95,384 1,21,297 1,87,784 6.5% 282,3 295,371 3,117 289,81 333,195 3,25 313,767 37,85 317,563 3.2% 337,317 311,323 374,966 347,389 369,332 338,28 43,487 421,528 477,828 13.4% 3,75 32,541 35,679 33,37 34,718 39,315 34,956 29,41 36,556 24.3% 81,934 115,568,41 145,691 134,86 131,119 127,645 181,244 7,44-7.8% 26,979 33,31 29,735 32,581 36,827 41,153 49,453 6,84 62,778 4.5% 12,261 13,632 13,869 21,7 2,133 19,466 21,76 21,236 26,14 22.5% 5,391 185,727 214,919 222,88 225,652 235,768 212,964 217,562 213,57-68,39 74,552 87,94 88,337 88,99 93,11 85,977 86,11 84,121-24,99 29,491 32,612 32,289 31,74 28,466 24,856 24,3 25,351 4.9% 9,17 9,969 1,883 12,55 12,4 1,985 11,819 9,8 9,26-6.2% 1,683 13,54 15,891 15,159 15,762 17,425 14,432 17,63,837-7,2 8,33 9,381 1,499 9,8 11,465 11,181 12,84 9,3-24.2% 5,628 5,645 6,614 7,261 7,929 7,649 6,264 6,664 6,135-7.9% Holland/ 12,83 13,49 14,545 15,71 15,528 17,377 13,93 12,624 1,782-14.6% 8,763 9,492 1,539 11,222 11,365 12,932 11,91 1,786 12,321 14.2% 4,227 5,18 5,535 6,622 6,1 8,433 6,651 5,61 6,195 1 4,94 4,978 6,446 7,325 1,476 12,153 1,775 14,963 15,574 4.1% 3,583 4, 6,761 5,66 5,94 7,231 6,36 6,62 7,935 3 2,342 2,538 2,126 2,785 3,32 2,452-19.1% 5,896 7,899 7,773 8,57 7,34 6,514 6,86 8,683 7,435-14.4% 14,685 18,823 22,229 29,982 28,611 26,139 25,241 27,92 29,532 9.% 14,685 18,823 22,229 24,36 23,253 2,797 2,7 21,87 21,884 3.8% 5,946 5,358 5,342 5,171 6,5 7,648 27.4% 22,226 25,382 29,25 28,39 28,598 3,997 29,646 34,488 41,779 2 4,67 5,264 6,142 6,694 6,79 7,482 8,142 8,625 7,5-12.9% 3,698 2,311 3,821 2,271 2,554 3,32 18.7% 4,231 5,964 4,958 4,97 6,441 1,734 66.6% 17,619 2,118 23,62 13,687 13,534 14,735 14,263,868 2,498 2 973,8 1,31,677 1,126,759 1,151,74 1,211,925 1,178,487 1,218,234 1,3,439 1,372,62 5.5% 6.% 9.2% 5.3% -2.8% 3.4% 6.7% 5.5% % Change per year 29

Table 2. Number of Tourist Arrivals, 25-213 Nationality 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 % Change 211 212 % Change 212 213 61,738 628,588 69,148 676,445 723,76 714,288 784,579 826,689 912,861 5.4% 1 23,949 239,886 25,38 243,38 285,779 277,655 272,93 269,393 277,182-2.9% 281,365 278,58 336,45 31,395 39,127 296,825 361,48 379,842 426,25 5.1% 1 22,333 24,72 25,649 26,378 26,918 31,53 28,658 25,273 31,829-1 25.9% 35,782 45,23 4,79 5,248 54,333 54,229 61,12 8,515 98,792 3 22.7% 22,765 3,623 26,764 29,281 31,842 37,667 42,945 54,2 56,566 25.8% 4.7% 8,543 1,98 1,943 17,14 15,763,48 17,447 17,645 22,467 27.3% 146,362 6,974 194,63 24,1 26,494 219,69 194,43 198,219 199,655 61,222 68,214 8,418 81,543 81,974 87,72 79,721 8,127 79,551-2,978 24,736 28,214 28,111 28,39 25,717 21,584 21,35 23,185-2.5% 1 8,557 9,46 1,12 11,836 12,95 1,767 11,27 9,335 8,78 -.7% -5.9% 9,959 12, 15,19 14,64 15,44 17,39 13,729 15,937 15,911.1% - 6,327 7,35 8,446 9,56 8,681 1,591 1,115 1,487 8,418 3.7% -19.7% 5, 5,278 6,198 6,664 7,21 7,197 6, 6,288 5,875 4.5% -6.6% 11,569 12,196 13,282 14,382 14,53,78 12,346 11,89 1,276-3.7% -13.6% 8,363 8,921 1,11 1,845 11,91 12,65 11,433 1,323 11,848-9.7% 14.8% 3,492 4,467 4,968 6,159 5,428 8,71 5,669 4,796 5,757-15.4% 2 2,753 3,88 5,27 5,965 8,653 9,124 8,774 12,679 14,48 44.5% 1 3,24 3,753 6,4 4,99 5,647 7,24 6,17 5,739 7,329-7.% 27.7% 1,935 1,86 1,762 1,898 2,293 2,8 2-5.5% NORTH AMERICA 4,741 6,8 6,421 7,656 6,334 6,23 5,768 7,29 6,59 26.4% -1 11,979,325 19,342 26,346 24,94 22,793 22,791 24,243 26,1 6.4% 7.7% 11,979,325 19,342 2,856 2,8 17,826 17,946 18,74 19,157 4.2% 2.4% 5,49 4,86 4,967 4,844 5,539 6,959 14.3% 25.6% 17.1% 25.6% 17,812 21,459 24,819 24,24 24,979 27,949 25,43 29,785 37,49 4,274 4,645 5,783 6,117 6,365 7,66 7,633 7,973 6,981 4.5% -12.4% 2,855 1,717 3,382 2,38 2,392 2,981 17.4% 24.6% Other Countries 3,661 5,119 4,228 4,35 5,83 9,91 44.5% 7 % change per year 13,537,814 19,36 11,572 11,779 13,272 11,724 13,59 17,537 15.9% 29.% 777,89 833,345 928,912 931,111 98,173 984,99 1,27,229 1,78,937 1,176,42 5.% 9.% 7.1% 1 5.3% 4.4% 5.% 9.% 3

Table 3a. Foreign Arrivals by Nationality and Category of Traveller, 213 Nationality Returning Residents Tourists Same-day Visitors Others 21,141 912,861 136,965,817 1,87,784 8,293 277,182 26,53 6,36 317,563 5,949 426,25 39,65 6,25 477,828 573 31,829 3,496 658 36,556 3,347 98,792 63,294 1,611 7,44 62,778 1,749 56,566 3,31 1,432 1,23 22,467 1,442 875 26,14 2,966 199,655 8,772 2,113 213,57 1,54 79,551 2,262 768 84,121 377 23,185 1,493 296 25,351 123 8,78 252 5 9,26 46 15,911 65 275,837 112 8,418 49 144 9,3 113 5,875 1 31 6,135 144 1,276 34 58 1,782 53 11,848 349 7 12,321 32 5,757 33 76 6,195 139 14,48 1,364 22 15,574 44 7,329 445 1 7,935 93 2,8 122 7 2,452 151 6,59 64 136 7,435 217 26,1 2,526 673 29,532 181 19,157 1,953 593 21,884 36 6,959 573 79 7,648 41 37,49 2,836 1,124 41,779 1 6,981 46 66 7,5 2,981 2 3 3,32 1,734 9 9,91 448 285 39 17,537 1,98 744 2,498 24,734 1,176,42 151,1 2,727 1,372,62 Row Percentage Distribution 83.9% 12.6% 2.6% 87.3% 8.2% 89.2% 8.3% 87.1% 9.6% 2.% 59.1% 37.9% 2.8% 9 4.8% 4.7% 86.4% 5.5% 3.4% 93.5% 4.1% 94.6% 2.7% 9 5.9% 95.4% 2.7% 94.5% 3.6% 9 5.3% 95.8% 95.3% 2.8% 96.2% 2.8% 92.9% 5.3% 9 8.8% 92.4% 5.6% 31

Nationality Returning Residents Tourists Same-day Visitors Others 3.8% 88.4% 5.% 2.9% 2.% 87.5% 8.6% 88.4% 8.6% 87.5% 8.9% 2.7% 9 7.5% 89.5% 6.8% 2.7% 92.9% 6.1% 98.3% 9 4.2% 2.7% 85.6% 9.3% 3.6% 85.7% 1 Column Percentage Distribution 85.5% 77.6% 9 8 79.2% 33.5% 23.6% 17.2% 29.1% 23.1% 24.1% 36.2% 26.2% 29.9% 34.8% 2.7% 3.2% 2.7% 13.5% 8.4% 4 7.8% 1 7.1% 4.8% 2.% 6.9% 4.6% 5.% 4.2% 12.% 17.% 5.8% 1 15.6% 6.2% 6.8% 3.7% 6.1% 2.% 3.2% 2.9% 3.2% 5.4% 3.% 3.6% 32

Table 3b. Foreign Arrivals by Country of Residence and Category of Traveller, 213 Country of residence Namibia Holland/ Row Percentage Distribution Namibia Holland/ Returning residents 24,734 24,734 Tourists 282,247 432,464 35,18 99,128 52,282 2,595 76,47 22,71 8,636 15,77 8,28 5,959 1,55 12,241 5,751 13,21 7,268 2,35 6,329 7,76 17,69 6,261 9,319 2,397 17,58 1,176,42 Same-day visitors 26,143 4,213 4,42 63,342 2,626 1,433 2,77 1,445 235 541 41 143 223 359 326 1,259 525 123 634 465 1,789 452 317 2 1,956 151,1 Others 6,375 6,283 596 1,723 1,4 729 586 327 52 249 147 15 79 72 67 23 27 62 119 67 568 71 292 9 2,727 314,765 24,734 478,96 39,656 4,193 56,72 22,757 79,133 24,472 8,922 15,868 8,586 6,253 1,853 12,672 6,144 14,33 7,82 2,22 7,81 7,68 19,965 6,784 9,928 2,417 2,435 1,372,62. 1......................... 1.8 89.7. 9.3 88.3 6.4 93.2 9.5 96.6 92.8 96.8 95. 93.5 95.3 97.2 96.6 93.6 91. 92.9 91.7 89.4 93. 88.2 92.3 93.9 99.2 86. 85.7 8.3. 8.4 1.2 38.6 4.7 6.3 2.6 5.9 2.6 3.4 4.8 2.3 2.1 2.8 5.3 8.8 6.7 5.5 9. 6.1 9. 6.7 3.2.8 9.6 11. 2.. 1.3 1.5 1. 2.1 3.2.7 1.3.6 1.6 1.7 2.4.7.6 1.1.2.3 2.8 1.7.9 2.8 1. 2.9. 4.4 1.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 33

Table 4. Tourist Arrivals by Nationality and Purpose of Visit, 213 Nationality Row Percentage Distribution Visiting Friends/ Relatives 53,25 111,58 298,393 19,785 63,569 28,818 8,43 42,37 17,65 3,515 1,21 118 2,593 1,58 1,773 1,51 79 9,342 7 373 1,432 437 437 11,368 814 1,45 2,26 6,844 583,867 Holiday 235,93 92,641 13,35 6,651 17,179 7,97 7,365 144,874 58,866,754 7,14 15,3 4,88 4,636 8,134 9,74 4,48 3,589 6,48 1,341 4,83 23,36,815 6,491 18,884 5,684 926 4,58 7,694 422,157 Business 128,662 66,714 17,41 4,736,692 17,853 5,626 9,782 2,577 2,246 299 72 719 181 326 577 349 632 3 234 759 2,221 1,81 42 6,356 456 515 3,26 2,36 147,22 Other 19,8 6,769 7,241 657 1,353 1,987 1,74 2,962 53 67 7 7 297 43 2 29 485 43 219 235 153 14 48 81 27 91 45 638 22,996 912,861 277,182 426,25 31,829 98,792 56,566 22,467 199,655 79,551 23,185 8,78 15,911 8,418 5,875 1,276 11,848 5,757 14,48 7,329 2,8 6,59 26,1 19,157 6,959 37,49 6,981 2,981 9,91 17,537 1,176,42 58.1% 4 7 6 64.3% 5 37.4% 2 2 15.2% 13.8% 3 18.% 17.3% 12.7% 13.7% 66.5% 9.8% 22.% 1 1 48.6% 25.8% 33.4% 24.3% 2 17.4% 14.% 32.8% 72.6% 74.% 7 8 94.3% 57.1% 78.9% 79.2% 8 76.6% 25.5% 87.4% 62.7% 8 8 3 93.3% 89.2% 14.1% 24.1% 4.% 14.9%.9% 3 25.% 4.9% 3.2% 9.7% 3.4% 4.5% 8.5% 3.1% 3.2% 4.9% 6.1% 4.5% 1 6.5% 6.5% 17.3% 6.% 8.5% 2.4% 3.5% 4.8% 2.9% 3.5% 3.6% 3.5% 3.6% 3.1% 34

Nationality Column Percentage Distribution Visiting Friends/ Relatives 48.6% 22.8% 39.% 49.6% Holiday 87.8% 3 46.2% 43.9% 35.9% Business 9.4% 17.3% 3 13.5% 12.5% Other 3.1% 3.6% 2.% 9 19.% 5 3.4% 1 4.9% 7.2% 3.% 55.7% 2 24.5% 4.1% 34.3% 13.9% 4.% 3.6% 5.5% 4.% 4.5% 87.5% 45.4% 1 3.2% 1 1 3.8% 6.7% 4.3% 83.% 29.4% 3 2.9% 5.9% 8.6% 4.7% 12.9% 2.9% 3.5% 2.8% 77.6% 23.6% 36.2% 2.7% 8.4% 4.8% 17.% 6.8% 2.% 3.2% 35

Table 5. Tourist Arrivals by Nationality and Sex, 213 Nationality Row Percentage Distribution Male 588,25 195,738 259,8 17,744 59,575 39,5,444 114,866 42,47 13,91 4,543 8,613 4,712 3,176 5,47 6,92 3,589 11,813 4,538 1,671 4,332 15,581 11,262 4,319 25,6 3,369 2,429 7,42 12,417 744,88 Female 324,836 81,444 7,17 14,85 39,217 17,5 6,23 84,79 37,81 9,276 4,237 7,298 3,76 2,699 4,869 5,755 2,8 2,235 2,791 497 2,177 1,535 7,895 2,64 11,793 3,612 553 2,59 5,12 431,954 912,861 277,182 426,25 31,829 98,792 56,566 22,467 199,655 79,551 23,185 8,78 15,911 8,418 5,875 1,276 11,848 5,757 14,48 7,329 2,8 6,59 26,1 19,157 6,959 37,49 6,981 2,981 9,91 17,537 1,176,42 64.4% 7 6 55.7% 6 69.9% 73.2% 57.5% 53.4% 6 5 54.1% 56.% 54.1% 52.6% 5 6 84.1% 6 77.1% 66.6% 59.7% 58.8% 6 68.5% 35.6% 29.4% 39.2% 44.3% 39.7% 3 26.8% 42.5% 46.6% 4 48.3% 45.9% 44.% 45.9% 47.4% 48.6% 37.7% 15.9% 38.1% 22.9% 33.4% 4 4 37.9% 3 36

Nationality Column Percentage Distribution Male 48.3% 8 74.7% 7 63.3% Female 5 18.5% 25.3% 29.2% 36.7% 79.% 26.3% 34.8% 2.4% 8.% 5.3% 15.4% 5.7% 3.4% 75.2% 18.9% 38.7% 3.3% 9.1% 3.9% 19.6% 8.6% 2.4% 2.7% 77.6% 23.6% 36.2% 2.7% 8.4% 4.8% 17.% 6.8% 2.% 3.2% 37

Table 6. Tourist Arrivals by Nationality and Age, 213 Nationality Row Percentage Distribution - 19 74,82 25,71 36,586 2,686 5,56 3,376 964 13,891 5,356 1,996 632 1,671 418 374 671 783 248 492 884 42 324 1,831 1,531 3 1,87 513 45 472 841 92,412 2-29 184,244 38,645 93,18 7,28 28,352 12,86 4,34 22,479 9,74 2,331 448 1,661 2,35 686 1,5 1,472 451 859 933 296 718 4,244 3,212 1,32 6,677 933 431 2,37 2,944 217,644 3-39 261,221 53,362 133,574 9,868 35,296 22,84 7,36 3,73 9,797 3,461 1,655 2,3 9 611 1,5 1,932 1,639 3,53 798 545 1,384 3,93 2,259 1,671 8,115 888 513 2,67 4,18 33,338 4-49 28,18 61,655 15,132 6,851 17,392 11,532 5,456 36,327 13,878 3,59 1,794 2,495 1,253 845 1,625 2,21 1,588 3,158 1,533 615 1,824 4,46 3,118 1,342 8,258 1,127 1,221 2,517 3,393 257,64 5-59 119,939 57,945 42,599 3,126 8,186 4,893 3,19 45,312 19,27 5,4 1,74 3,67 1,395 1,721 2,428 2,268 1,242 2,794 1,77 479 1,499 4,829 3,718 1,111 6,284 1,272 432 1,397 3,183 176,364 6+ 64,618 39,874 15,25 2,269 4,6 1,875 1,517 51,574 22,239 6,725 2,512 4, 2,42 1,638 2,52 3,183 589 3,243 1,413 191 76 6,823 5,319 1,54 6,24 2,248 34 548 3,69 129,219 912,861 277,182 426,25 31,829 98,792 56,566 22,467 199,655 79,551 23,185 8,78 15,911 8,418 5,875 1,276 11,848 5,757 14,48 7,329 2,8 6,59 26,1 19,157 6,959 37,49 6,981 2,981 9,91 17,537 1,176,42 8.2% 9.3% 8.6% 8.4% 5.6% 6.% 4.3% 7.% 6.7% 8.6% 7.2% 1 5.% 6.4% 6.5% 6.6% 4.3% 3.5% 1 5.% 7.% 8.% 4.3% 5.% 2 13.9% 2 2 28.7% 22.6% 19.2% 1 1 1 5.1% 1 24.2% 1 14.8% 12.4% 7.8% 6.1% 12.7% 13.6% 1.2%.8% 14.8% 17.8% 28.6% 19.3% 3 3 35.7% 39.% 3 15.1% 1 14.9% 18.8% 14.6% 1 1 14.8%.3% 28.5% 24.9% 1 25.1% 2 15.% 1 24.% 2 22.8% 2 24.7% 2 17.6% 2 24.3% 18.2% 17.4% 15.1% 2 15.7% 14.9% 14.4% 15.8% 18.7% 27.6% 22.5% 2 28.4% 28.% 17.1%.3% 19.3% 2 13.1% 2 1 9.8% 8.3% 8.7% 14.2% 22.7% 24.1% 2 19.8% 22.7%.6% 29.3% 23.6% 19.1% 2 19.9% 24.1% 2 23.% 18.5% 19.4%.%.8% 7.1% 14.4% 3.5% 7.1% 4.1% 3.3% 6.7% 25.8% 28.% 29.% 28.6% 26.1% 28.5% 27.9% 24.5% 26.9% 1 23.1% 19.3% 8.8% 1 26.1% 27.8% 2.6% 38

Nationality Column Percentage Distribution - 19 7.3% 4.8% 4.8% 7.9% 2-29 13.4% 14.5% 23.9%.8% 18.5% 3-39 12.7% 17.2% 26.3% 23.4% 25.8% 4-49.1% 4 25.4% 19.3% 2 5-59 18.2% 14.5% 14.1% 18.1% 15.% 6+ 3 1 5.5% 17.5% 1 8 27.8% 39.6% 2.9% 6.% 3.7% 15.% 5.8% 2.% 2.% 84.7% 17.8% 42.8% 3.2% 13.% 5.9% 2.% 1 4.2% 3.1% 86.1% 17.6% 44.% 3.3% 1 7.3% 9.9% 3.2% 2.7% 8 24.% 4 2.7% 6.8% 4.5% 14.1% 5.4% 3.2% 68.% 32.9% 24.2% 4.6% 2.8% 25.7% 1 2.9% 2.% 2.7% 3.6% 5 3 1 3.1% 39.9% 17.2% 5.2% 3.2% 2.% 2.5% 2.5% 5.3% 4.1% 4.8% 2.4% 77.6% 23.6% 36.2% 2.7% 8.4% 4.8% 17.% 6.8% 2.% 3.2% 39

Table 7. Tourist Arrivals by Nationality and Mode of Travel, 213 Nationality Row Percentage Distribution Air 153,891 8,83 53,43 2,46 3,898 4,744 9,357 13,2 56,87 13,977 7,254 12,246 4,7 4,125 5,584 8,695 3,549 2,372 4,866 1,636 4,391 14,957 11,838 3,119 21,621 2,76 1,132 7,462 1,321 32,685 Road 754,426 193,713 372,911 29,254 93,987 51,595 12,966 65,214 2,717 8,147 1,526 3,595 3,593 1,64 4,624 3,43 2,139 11,676 2,313 359 1,842 9,512 5,849 3,663 14,548 3,558 1,849 2,448 6,693 843,7 Other 4,544 2,665 7 529 98 226 145 4,225 2,28 1,62 7 11 111 68 11 68 151 173 276 1,648 1,47 178 1,24 717 523 11,657 912,861 277,182 426,25 31,829 98,792 56,566 22,467 199,655 79,551 23,185 8,78 15,911 8,418 5,875 1,276 11,848 5,757 14,48 7,329 2,8 6,59 26,1 19,157 6,959 37,49 6,981 2,981 9,91 17,537 1,176,42.9% 29.2% 12.5% 6.4% 3.9% 8.4% 4 65.2% 7 6 82.6% 77.% 56.% 7 54.3% 73.4% 6.9% 66.4% 75.5% 67.5% 57.3% 6 44.8% 57.8% 82.6% 69.9% 87.5% 9 95.1% 9 57.7% 32.7% 26.% 35.1% 17.4% 22.6% 42.7% 27.9% 45.% 25.7% 37.2% 83.1% 3.6% 28.3% 36.4% 3 52.6% 38.9% 2.5% 4.6% 8.% 4.2% 6.3% 7.7% 2.6% 3.3% 4

Nationality Column Percentage Distribution Air 38.8% 38.% 75.3% 58.9% 27.3% Road 5 62.% 24.7% 38.2% 7 Other 1 3.% 48.% 25.2%.5% 2.9% 4 17.7% 4.4% 3.8% 2.7% 4.7% 3.7% 6.7% 3.2% 89.4% 23.% 44.2% 3.5% 1 6.1% 7.7% 2.5% 39.% 22.9% 4.5% 7.8% 36.2% 17.4% 9.1% 2.4% 14.1% 12.6% 1 6.1% 4.5% 77.6% 23.6% 36.2% 2.7% 8.4% 4.8% 17.% 6.8% 2.% 3.2% 41

Table 8. Tourist Arrivals by Nationality and Regional Border Posts, 213 Nationality Column Percentage Distribution Hosea Kutako Airport 125, 56,84 52,347 1,799 2,546 4, 7,648 121,1 54,332 11,373 6,745 11,469 4,222 4,72 5,188 8,63 3,12 2,73 4,865 1,55 3,71 13,823 11,5 2,659 18,484 2,465 868 6,585 8,566 278,628 Eros Airport 1,5 941 128 48 223 48 32 63 63 112 79 32 64 48 1,565 Northern Border Posts 34,288 22,712 39,237 1,495 2,421 2,399 2,23 17,96 2,278 891 57 312 1,129 197 348 966 9,767 341 11 186 2,894 1,332 1,562 5,653 1,132 1,22 3,32 365,931 North Eastern Border Posts 2,4,927 59,928 11,23 88,935 18,136 5,214 21,221 8,231 3,142 445 1,582 968 698 1,32 1,226 659 1,513 846 37 571 4,843 3,997 847 4,858 1,934 627 86 1,491 231,85 Southern Border Posts 139,181 124,49 2,929 368 2,696 5,99 3,23 23,337 9,92 3,77 46 1,393 1,263 532 2,383 1,269 557 238 1,14 261 1,158 2,66 1,543 1,63 3,645 1,969 91 1,585 8,769 TransKalahari Border Posts 78,486 31,947 8,897 842 25,376 2,68 7,185 3,1 1,157 15 342 343 29 658 658 26 158 263 52 132 8 447 369 1,347 371 421 554 87,835 Other Airports 28,417 23,82 64 231 1,335 68 1,728 9,432 2,568 2,819 59 748 494 71 397 28 537 299 22 76 1,22 593 428 3,358 242 264 862 1,99 42,229 912,861 277,182 426,25 31,829 98,792 56,566 22,467 199,655 79,551 23,185 8,78 15,911 8,418 5,875 1,276 11,848 5,757 14,48 7,329 2,8 6,59 26,1 19,157 6,959 37,49 6,981 2,981 9,91 17,537 1,176,42 44.9% 2 18.8% 2.7% 43.5% 19.5% 4.1% 2.4% 4.1% 3.1% 5.% 4.% 74.5% 6 8.2% 3.1% 14.3% 3.1% 4.1% 4.1% 7.1% 5.1% 93.% 6.2% 84.5% 4.7% 2.7% 86.6% 7.3% 25.9% 4.8% 38.5% 7.8% 9.2% 3.6% 82.5% 73.5% 3.5% 13.8% 5.4% 89.4% 36.4% 19.2% 28.9% 3.% 8.2% 3.4% 67.3% 56.4% 3.2% 4.1% 2 6.1% 6.7% 2.4% 77.6% 23.6% 36.2% 2.7% 8.4% 4.8% 17.% 6.8% 2.% 42

Nationality Row Percentage Distribution Hosea Kutako Airport 6.6% 2.4% 3.1% Eros Airport 4.1% 3.1% Northern Border Posts North Eastern Border Posts Southern Border Posts TransKalahari Border Posts Other Airports 8.% 2.% 4.7% 3.2% 13.7% 2 1 5.7% 2.6% 7.1% 34.% 6 68.3% 49.1% 76.8% 7 5 69.3% 5 72.6% 5 14.8% 66.4% 69.4% 56.9% 52.9% 58.3% 38.2% 49.4% 35.3% 29.1% 66.4% 48.8% 23.7% 37.3% 8.2% 72.6% 4.7% 2.5% 4.2% 9.% 8.6% 2.9% 3.8% 6.5% 2.% 13.4% 3.4% 3.4%.8% 69.5% 4.7% 5.1% 2.9% 1 7.% 22.4% 15.1% 38.% 1 18.8% 3 2 6.1% 14.1% 34.6% 9 3 23.2% 1 1 13.6% 5.1% 9.9% 1 1 12.7% 1 1 1 1 8.8% 18.5% 2 1 13.% 27.7% 2 8.1% 8.5% 19.6% 15.2% 44.8% 2.7% 1 14.4% 1 1.3% 4.6% 8.8% 15.% 9.1% 23.2% 1 9.7% 13.8% 1 17.8% 1 8.1% 15.3% 9.7% 28.2% 3.% 9.% 14.4% 8.6% 1 53.1% 44.9% 1 3.6% 3.8% 5.% 4.1% 4.9% 6.4% 5.6% 3.6% 2.4% 2.% 3.1% 5.3% 3.6% 5.3% 4.3% 3.2% 7.5% 3.1% 8.6% 7.7% 4.7% 3.2% 1 5.8% 4.7% 5.9% 3.9% 9.3% 9.3% 1 3.9% 3.1% 6.2% 9.% 3.5% 8.9% 8.7% 1 3.6% 43

Table 9. Tourist Arrivals by Nationality and Intended Length of Stay, 213 Nationality AFRIQUE Row Percentage Distribution 2-3 days 137,82 43,44 59,679 7,45 18,43 6,194 2,33 22,467 7,851 2,83 72 1,348 878 662 978 79 263 4,342 757 47 687 4,296 2,987 1,38 5,438 1,557 35 1,141 2,435 9,283 4-7 days 22,53 77,1 83,89 9,869,248 9,989 5,857 3,358 1,47 4,434 871 1,981 1,483 697 1,643 1,391 1,574 3,74 967 292 1,274 5,97 4,439 1,467 9,34 1,3 1,123 2,517 4,231 247,352 8-14 days 22,12 83,753 84,814 6,575 23,329 15,543 5,997 67,2 25,197 8,269 4,628 6,731 3,74 2,15 3,142 3,837 2,79 2,345 2,683 538 2,392 8,181 6,311 1,871 9,51 2,188 648 1,913 4,34 34,265 15-21 days 149,645 33,958 73,991 2,228 3,243 6,569 2,657 49,61 22,985 3,953 1,823 4,24 1,329 1,525 2,495 3,996 1,121 1,86 2,179 279 1,311 4,348 2,961 1,387 7,11 1,341 587 1,777 3,45 21,4 22-364 days 24,68 39,426 124,451 5,752 1,542 18,27 5,627 3,749 13,471 3,726 738 1,647 1,655 887 2,18 1,914 72 1,797 743 588 845 3,385 2,459 926 6,776 732 319 2,563 3,3 244,978 Tourist Arrivals 912,861 277,182 426,25 31,829 98,792 56,566 22,467 199,655 79,551 23,185 8,78 15,911 8,418 5,875 1,276 11,848 5,757 14,48 7,329 2,8 6,59 26,1 19,157 6,959 37,49 6,981 2,981 9,91 17,537 1,176,42 Average Duration of Stay 23 18 18 36 31 18 2 19 15 22 17 21 19 2 12 15 23 18 17 21 14 19 3 19 19 15.% 15.5% 14.% 23.3% 18.7% 1 1 1 9.9% 1 8.2% 8.5% 1 1 9.5% 6.% 4.6% 3 1 2 1.4% 15.6% 18.8% 2 27.8% 19.5% 3.4% 17.7% 26.1% 15.2% 12.6% 19.1% 9.9% 12.5% 17.6% 1.% 1 27.3% 26.4% 13.2% 13.5% 19.6% 22.6% 23.2% 2 24.1% 3 19.9% 2 23.6% 27.5% 26.7% 33.6% 3 35.7% 52.7% 4 36.5% 35.8% 3 32.4% 36.1%.7% 36.6% 24.8% 36.8% 3 32.9% 26.9%.4% 1 17.4% 7.% 3 1 1 24.6% 28.9% 17.1% 2 26.4% 15.8% 26.% 24.3% 33.7% 19.5% 13.2% 29.7% 12.9% 2.6% 15.5% 19.9% 22.4% 14.2% 29.2% 18.1% 1 3 25.% 15.4%.9%.1% 8.4% 1 19.7% 15.1% 19.6%.2% 12.5% 12.8% 1 27.1% 13.% 13.% 12.8% 13.3% 23 18 18 36 31 18 2 19 15 22 17 21 19 2 12 15 23 18 17 44

Nationality Column Percentage Distribution 2-3 days 14.5% 2 1 1 13.9% 14.4% 4-7 days 24.1%.7% 37.7% 25.4% 24.1% 2 8-14 days 24.2% 3 2 19.3% 24.5% 25.9% 15-21 days 19.% 19.2% 19.7% 17.9% 19.4% 17.9% 22-364 days 18.1% 1 1 25.9% 18.% 2 Tourist Arrivals Average Duration of Stay 21 14 19 3 19 19 8 25.4% 35.3% 4.4% 1 3.7% 13.3% 4.6% 2.6% 2.5% 3.2% 8 3 33.6% 4.% 6.6% 4.% 2.4% 1 4.1% 2.4% 3.7% 7 27.5% 27.9% 7.7% 5.1% 2.% 22.% 8.3% 2.7% 2.7% 3.% 7.2% 35.2% 14.4% 3.1% 23.3% 1 2.% 3.4% 83.3%.1% 5 4.3% 7.5% 12.6% 5.5% 2.8% 77.6% 23.6% 36.2% 2.7% 8.4% 4.8% 17.% 6.8% 2.% 3.2% 23 18 18 36 31 18 2 19 15 22 17 21 19 2 12 15 23 18 17 21 14 19 3 19 19 45

Table 1. Tourist Arrivals by Nationality and Month, 213 Nationality Percentage Distribution January 69,865 15,922 37,74 2, 6,676 6,97 1,99 1,542 3,953 1,132 245 971 1,147 21 345 351 272 856 187 285 587 1,153 764 389 2,4 8 12 568 1,56 83,977 February 67,657,61 34,981 1,669 7,138 5,427 1,839 11,317 4,734 1,989 7 34 857 231 265 444 87 1,379 334 5 422 1,484 1,96 388 2,448 373 253 861 96 82,96 March 77,212 25,697 35,188 2,846 7,789 4,148 1,545 15,713 7,561 1,434 2 853 817 473 58 91 349 1,67 456 193 318 1,365 1,86 28 2,899 697 121 849 1,232 97,189 April 75,635 24,96 35,134 2,453 6,943 4,934 2,75 14,411 5,93 1,942 789 1,372 629 547 83 895 217 747 428 222 726 2,95 1,62 476 3,381 621 294 831 1,635 95,523 May 75,69 21,943 41,11 2,225 5,769 3,238 1,324 12,756 5,176 1,449 377 1,15 683 343 557 788 33 1,172 364 45 458 2,2 1,86 356 2,99 459 81 343 1,2 92,625 June 82,575 3,225 3,156 2,98 14,2 4,736 1,359 1,918 4,577 1,462 424 682 473 213 1,13 351 175 629 369 26 343 2,499 1,964 535 2,828 534 254 569 1,47 98,82 July 85,828 25,146 39,37 2,943 12,69 4,193 1,9 2,19 5,543 2,79 819 1,95 71 59 1,84 1,414 857 1,282 1,543 1 637 2,844 2,368 477 3,395 822 831 597 1,145 112,86 August 82,381 22,81 41,343 3,711 8,481 4,34 1,731 23,889 9,681 2,599 2,482 1,828 24 961 1,4 749 1,174 1,61 68 9 552 2,754 2,96 658 3,353 77 9 843 1,651 112,377 September 78,856 24,528 33,258 3,436 9,946 4,678 3,1 17,437 6,695 2,876 657 1,5 877 373 1,67 1,298 412 433 556 17 586 3,438 2,34 1,133 4,345 1,134 122 1,59 2,31 14,76 October 56,625 13,899 28,28 2,354 5,361 4,712 2,271 33,48 14,126 2,595 1,347 3,118 1,35 1,385 1,171 2,99 535 2,225 1,33 32 89 2,569 1,839 73 4,24 579 317 1,578 1,73 96,446 November 69,426 18,489 36,149 2,736 8,466 2,448 1,139,588 6,987 1,789 962 868 291 35 999 1,12 1,119 784 75 192 467 2,32 1,88 944 3,65 467 122 1,338 1,138 91,111 December 91,192 37,827 34,566 3,252 5,612 7,651 2,286 13,18 5,424 1,21 445 1,412 661 243 57 539 231 1,323 377 122 523 1,721 1,127 594 2,976 356 376 476 1,768 18,97 912,861 277,182 426,25 31,829 98,792 56,566 22,467 199,655 79,551 23,185 8,78 15,911 8,418 5,875 1,276 11,848 5,757 14,48 7,329 2,8 6,59 26,1 19,157 6,959 37,49 6,981 2,981 9,91 17,537 1,176,42 7.7% 5.7% 7.4% 6.% 8.5% 9.3% 8.3% 8.7% 8.3% 7.9% 9.% 1 9.4% 9.1% 9.% 8.2% 8.6% 8.8% 6.2% 5.% 7.6% 6.7% 1 13.6% 46