Performance Review Body 18
Performance Review Body 19
Performance Review Body 20
Conclusions Performance is the bottom line Major change under SES II Enforceable performance targets, incentives Significant performance improvements in first step (RP1) Low traffic has significant impact Next challenge is RP2 targets Performance Review Body 21
Military in the Performance Scheme? Riga 24 May 2013 Performance Review Body designated by the European Commission
Outline Scope Conflict of interest? Way forward Influence of military activity on performance Benefit of working together What is monitored in RP1 What is monitored in RP2 Content of Performance Plan Performance Review Body 23
Scope of Performance Scheme IR 390/2013: Article 1 (1) to improve the overall performance of air navigation services and network functions for general air traffic Performance Review Body 24
Conflict of interest? The Performance Scheme: should contribute to the sustainable development of the air transport system by improving the overall efficiency on ANS across the key performance areas of safety, environment, capacity and cost efficiency... should be without prejudice to the provisions of (EC) No 549/2004 aiming at safeguarding essential security or defence policy interests. Performance Review Body 25
Way forward Civil-military cooperation and coordination are of the utmost importance in achieving the objectives of the performance scheme, having due regard to military mission effectiveness. Performance Review Body 26
Influence of military activity on performance. Safety: Vital that safety is ensured. Nonparticipating aircraft must be protected from dangerous activities; Capacity: Restriction / Segregation of airspace can limit available capacity: Performance involves balancing demand and capacity; Performance Review Body 27
Influence of military activity on performance. Flight efficiency: Restriction / Segregation of airspace can restrict available route options: Performance involves making optimal routes available for users. Cost efficiency: Freeing up existing capacity during peak periods avoids the cost of capacity enhancement projects. Performance involves avoiding additional costs. Performance Review Body 28
Benefit of working together. FABEC set up a joint Civil and Military FABEC Olympics Cell for Extended Pre-Tactical Air Traffic Flow and Capacity Management/ Airspace Management in August 2012. Performance Review Body 29
What is monitored in RP1? Effective booking procedures Utilisation of CDRs High level indicators reflecting performance of airspace users. Show potential for improvement. Performance Review Body 30
What will be monitored in RP2 Effective booking procedures (increased granularity) Rate of planning of conditional routes Effective use of conditional routes New requirement for information on how FUA concept is applied by States to provide optimum benefit for both civil and military airspace users. Performance Review Body 31
Content of Performance Plan MILITARY DIMENSION OF THE PLAN: describing the performance of FUA application in order to increase capacity with due regard to military mission effectiveness, and if deemed appropriate, relevant performance indicators and targets consistent with the indicators and targets of the performance plan. Performance Review Body 32
Summary Military have critical role in improving performance for airspace users; Performance scheme has to work around national military requirements; Flexible Use of Airspace can ensure that all users requirements are satisfied; States to report on how they apply FUA legislation to satisfy civil and military users requirements. Performance Review Body 33
Questions? Performance Review Body 34