Presentation of 1 st Interim Report 2006 Stockholm and London, May 4-5

Similar documents
Continued good growth in most SAS Group markets first Quarter SAS Group EBT trend on the right track. Improved Result 1 st Quarter 2007

Third Quarter Presentation of Year end Report 2005 Stockholm and London, February SAS Group positive result 2005

Analyst Meeting Full Year 2006

Third Quarter 2004 Analyst presentation November, 2004

Second Quarter nd Quarter result improved by MSEK 526. Improved load and stable yields. Positive result and improved operating performance

SAS AB:s interim report April 29 th 2008

SAS AB Analyst meeting

Second Quarter 2004 Teleconference

The SAS Group five business areas as from Q SAS Group statement of income

SAS Group Q2 2012/13. Q2 Restructuring programme moving KPIs in the right direction

SAS AB:s Press Conference. Augusti 14 th 2008

SAS Group 1 st interim report 2011

SAS Group Q Teleconference August 8, 2012

SAS Group 1 st interim report 2011

Press conference Full Year 2006

Strengthened SAS delivers positive result in Q3

SAS Group Presentation Carnegie, May 22, 2012 Sture Stölen, Head of IR

SAS Group Q Teleconference

SAS Group Interim Report

On the right track cost cuts taking effects 1 st Quarter Weakest quarter in history for airline industry

SAS Q1 2017/2018. Q1 in Summary: Improved earnings CHANGE VS. Q1 FY17

3rd Quarter Analyst Presentation

SAS Q1 2016/

SAS Q2 2017/2018 TELECONFERENCE

A challenging Quarter, but record passenger numbers. Quarter overshadowed by Q400 problems

SAS Q3 2015/2016. Q3 development largely in accordance with our expectations. Q3 update. Change vs. LY

SAS Group Asia Tour Financial Hearing Presentation May 14, 2012

26 October 2017 Icelandair Group Interim Report NET PROFIT USD 101 MILLION IN THIRD QUARTER

SAS Q1 2013/14. Tough 1 st Quarter 2013/2014 as expected THE NEWEUROBONUS. Q1 EBT MSEK -146 Positive effects from pension plans MSEK 1,044

SAS Q3 2017/ August 2018

SAS Q3 2016/

Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA

SAS Q4 2016/2017. Q4 in Summary: Earnings in line with November outlook Negative currency effects of MSEK 273 CHANGE VS.

Analysts and Investors conference call. Q results. 15 May 2013

Finnair Q Result

Interim Report 3:2000 January-September

Finnair Group Interim Report 1 January 30 September 2008

VERY GOOD RESULTS IN OUR MOST IMPORTANT QUARTER

The SAS Group SAS Danmark A/S SAS Norge ASA SAS Sverige AB

NORWEGIAN AIR SHUTTLE ASA QUARTERLY REPORT FIRST QUARTER 2004 [This document is a translation from the original Norwegian version]

SAS Group Interim Report January-September 2010

Q1 2018/

SAS AB Q December 2018

SAS Q3 2016/2017. A strong summer performance drives result improvements CHANGE VS. Q3 FY16

Finnair Q Result

NORWEGIAN AIR SHUTTLE ASA QUARTERLY REPORT SECOND QUARTER 2006 [This document is a translation from the original Norwegian version]

Finnair Q Result

Q Finnair s growth continued Pekka Vähähyyppä

SAS takes forceful action in a challenging market

2012 Result. Mika Vehviläinen CEO

USD thousand Q Q Change % Change 12M 2015

Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA

Interim results. 11 May 2010

Finnair Group Interim Report 1 January 30 June 2008

Q Fast growth continued, Comparable operating result at record high levels Pekka Vauramo

Finnair 2015 kolmannen vuosineljänneksen tulos

Full Year 2009 Results

First quarter even weaker than expected. Group airlines recent capacity adjustments. SAS Group weakest Quarter ever

Commercial success improves earnings

Even Frydenberg, President & CEO Jan Johansson, CFO

Finnair Group Interim Report 1 January 31 March 2008

AIR BERLIN PLC Q2 RESULTS, APRIL JUNE Berlin, August 18 th, 2011

PROFITABLE GROWTH IN 2017 IN A CHALLENGING ENVIRONMENT

GOOD SECOND-QUARTER RESULTS. GOOD OUTLOOK FOR THE YEAR DESPITE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF EXTERNAL FACTORS ON EBITDA GUIDANCE.

Corporate presentation CIBC Whistler Institutional Investor Conference January 21, 2010

2007/08 Full Year Results Investor Briefing

Santander 22 nd Annual Latin American Conference. Cancun, January 2018

Air Berlin PLC AGM 06 June 2013 London

Q RESULTS STOCKHOLM, 21 APRIL 2016

PRELIMINARY ACCOUNTS FOR 2012

W.Douglas Parker, Chairman, President and CEO, US Airways

Leaving the Competition Behind. Second Quarter (Apr-Jun) 2009 Results

Finnair Group Annual Report 1 January 31 December 2006

Teleconference First Quarter 2002

SAS Group Interim Report January March 2012

Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2011 Results Presentation. February 1, 2012

Cebu Air, Inc. Annual Stockholders Briefing. 24 June cebupacificair.com

PRESS RELEASE Financial Results. Rising passenger traffic at 12.5m Exceeding 1bn in consolidated revenue

Finnair Q result. 25 October 2017 CEO Pekka Vauramo

FIRST QUARTER 2017 RESULTS. 4 May 2017

IAG results presentation. Quarter One th May 2018

Third Quarter 2014 Results. 29 October 2014

THIRD QUARTER RESULTS 2018


THAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL PCL

Even Frydenberg, President & CEO Jan Johansson, CFO

First Half 2013 Results. 16 mai 2013

PRESS RELEASE. First Half 2017 Financial Results Higher Load Factors and traffic lead to a significant rebound in second quarter profitability

Air China Limited Interim Results. August Under IFRS

Air China Limited Annual Results. March Under IFRS

First quarter even weaker than expected. Major steps of change implemented so far. SAS Group weakest Quarter ever

Air Berlin PLC Frankfurt, 29 August 2012 DVFA Small Cap Conference

Management Presentation. March 2016

Cebu Air, Inc. 2Q2014 Results of Operation

2017 A year of strong growth Finnair Q4 and FY 2017 result

Results 2Q17. August 9, 2017

Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Transportation Conference. June 16, 2010

Management Presentation. November 2011

Analyst and Investor Conference Call Q Ulrik Svensson, CFO and Member of the Executive Board

Interim Management Report First Half Results 2010/11. October 29, 2010

Transcription:

Result affected by pilot conflict and underlying yield pressure EBT bef nonrecurring items MSEK -1 319 in line with 25 Positive Easter Effect MSEK 1 Cost for conflicts of MSEK 25 Still underlying price pressure Lower volumes and price pressure in SGS and STS Strong growth and record load factors Jet fuel price effect MSEK 55 higher than last year Presentation of 1 st Interim Report 26 Stockholm and London, May 4-5 EBT result in improved by MSEK 25 New cost measures on track and extended from SEK 2, to SEK 2,5 billion 2 EBT result in line with last year Record load factors after introduction of New Business Models -March MSEK 26 Change Revenues 14 467 +1 451 EBITDAR 219-3 New Businesses Models very well received in market number of passengers up by 12,2% to a record 8,5 million Strong growth on European routes traffic up 18,4% Cabin factor change vs last year Lease & depreciation -1 414-12 EBIT -1 161-113 Financial net -226 +16 EBT -1 387-97 EBT bef non-recurring items -1 319-7 +14, p u +11, p u +8, p u +5, p u +2, p u -1, p u -4, p u -7, p u -1, p u Jan New Business Model Norwegian Domestic Mar Apr May jul Aug Sep Oct New Business Model Swedish domestic Nov Jan Mar Apr May New Business Model Europe jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Jan Mar Norway domestic Sweden domestic Europe 3 4

Group number of passengers grew by 12,2% in 1 st Quarter and has passed 37 million More than 4 million low fare tickets 19,% 17,% 15,% 13,% 11,% 5 9,% 7,% 5,% 3,% 1,% -1,% -3,% -5,% 4-dec 5-jan 5-feb 5-mar 5-apr 5-may 5-jun Passenger growth vs last month 5-jul 5-aug 5-sep oct-5 5-nov 5-dec 6-jan 6-feb 6-mar 37 5 37 36 5 36 35 5 35 34 5 34 33 5 33 32 5 Number of passengers (12 month-rolling) The largest low fare provider in the Nordic skies New Businesses Models has increased the number of low fare tickets Simplified rules one way prices Prices entirely demand driven Positive impact from one way experienced on Norwegian, Swedish domestic and Europe/ Intrascandinavian routes Reduced yield offset by increased load factor 6 More than 1 million low fare tickets offered in the Norwegian market 2 million low fare tickets offered in the Danish market 1 million low fare tickets offered in the Swedish market but we will also do much more for the frequent travellers Added services Attractive products/ services which can be Next added phase to base product to adjust product to customers individual preferences 7 More commercial initiatives to be introduced during 26: Next step in price model Improved benefits to loyal customers Product differentiation Improved internet sales engine Easier to find low fares Base product Attractive basic offer Few restrictions Price follows demand Gunilla Berg CFO

Strongest Improvements improvement in airlines in Scandinavian hotels Airlines Businesses SAS Improvements Group underlying airlines result and improved hotels MSEK 2-3 MSEK 26 Change -813 +175 Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines -281-136 Airline Support Businesses 39-97 Hotels -65 +81 Group eliminations, other -199-3 EBT bef nonrecurring items -1 319-7 1,,5, -,5 Cabin factor +5 p.u.,1 -,25,6,1 -,5,6 -,6 Inflation -,3 ECA -,1 Currency -,1 Support -,1-1, -1,5-1,3 25 Easter Strike Volume Yield Fuel (price) Cost program -1,3 Other 26 9 1 Positive free cash flow after investments and improved net debt Fuel cost at record level Full year fuel cost up SEK 2,5-3 billion -March SEK, billion 26 Cash flow from operations -1, Change in working capital 1. Net financing from operations -. Investments, adv. payments -.4 Acquisitions/sale of subsidiaries (net). Sale of fixed assets etc..6 Financing deficit/surplus.2 Change in external financing -. Cash flow from the period.2 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 strategy to offset jet fuel price Policy to hedge 4-6% of expected consumption (12 months) Yield management Cost initiatives Price increase due to very high prices on continuous basis jan-99 maj-99 sep-99 jan- maj- sep- jan-1 maj-1 sep-1 jan-2 maj-2 sep-2 jan-3 maj-3 sep-3 jan-4 maj-4 sep-4 jan-5 maj-5 sep-5 jan-6 Financial net debt 14.1 Available funds 14.4 11 12

Result improved for most Scandinavian Airlines Unit cost weighted for increased volume down in Q1 in MSEK Scandinavian Airlines Denmark Scandinavian Airlines Sweden Scandinavian Airlines International Revenues 2 313 3,6% 2 87 5,4% 1 869 3,4% 1 592 -,1% EBT bef nonrec. -289 +121-156 -68-84 +135-234 +21 Unit cost vs Unit cost Unit cost method last year adjusted for fuel ASK 7,1% 3,% 5% ASK & RPK 3,3%,% -1-2 -3-4 -5 13 EBT bef nonreccuring items SAS Denmark SAS Braathens SAS Sweden SAS International 25 26 14 5% ASK & passengers,9% -1,9% Unit cost based on only ASK is penalized by sharply improved cabin factor and utilization of capacity Unit cost weighted with increased traffic/passengers shows continued improved cost per passengers/traffic STS and SGS affected by lower volumes SEK 2,5 billion of new measures under implementation in 26-27 6 9 1 in MSEK Revenues 1 23-6,9% 1 529-2,9% 852 19,3% 126-1,6% EBT, bef nonrec. 8-56 1-41 -5-1 28 +8 Productivity (partly dependent on changes in collective agreements) Block hours F/D 7 h C/A 75 h Ground and technical services Productivity (part time) Leaner mgmt Line and Heavy Maintenance Simplified product Reduced component costs Administration/sales & other flight related costs IT Call centers Overhead Sales organization Airline Support Businesses 15 16 Structural cost measures of SEK 2,5 billion under implementation Measures increased by SEK,5 billion SEK,4 billion dependent on new collective agreements 44% implemented

Capacity Improvements guidance in reduced airlines due and to hotels increased focus on dynamic traffic planning 26 Fuel costs (SEK, billion) ~11 ASK up 2% (previous guiding 3-4%) Jørgen Lindegaard CEO 26 Yield down ASK -2% to -3% Load factor up Capacity 26 vs 25 Scandinavian Airlines Danmark -7% SAS Braathens +6% Scandinavian Airlines Sverige -9% Scandinavian Airlines International -6% Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines Capacity 26 vs 25 Spanair 1% Blue1 6% Widerøe 5-7% airbaltic 25% 17 Spanair weaker due to Easter Effect and challenges in Widerøe Blue1 and airbaltic expanding in their home markets 26 25 Total revenues 2 63 1 574 EBITDAR 143 119 EBT, bef nonrecurring items -235-158 26 25 Total revenues 721 639 EBITDAR 68 8 EBT, bef nonrecurring items -2 14 26 25 Total revenues 428 379 EBITDAR 11 34 EBT, bef nonrecurring items -26-4 26 25 Total revenues 287 192 EBITDAR 12-7 EBT, bef nonrecurring items -18-33 Robust traffic development in first Quarter Number of passengers up 35,6% Cabin factor up 5,9 p.u. to 6,1% Jet fuel up 7% vs last year corresponding to MSEK 212 also due to expansion 1 st Quarter negatively affected by Easter effect of MSEK 5 Traffic up 4,7% and cabin factor improved by 2,5 p.u. to 56,% Yield was down,3% in Q1 due to more low fare tickets in the market Unit cost up 6,9% due to jet fuel and costs for technical maintenance Strong traffic figures in Q1 Passengers up 19,5% Traffic up 23,8% Cabin factor up 5,5 p.u. to 59,5% Start up cost with European expansion 9 new destinations introduced from Helsinki Booking figures on tourist destinations are promising EBT improved MSEK 15 due to improved utilization Strong traffic development Number of passengers up 55,9% Cabin factor improved 8,8 p.u. to 59,% Unit cost up 7,7% negatively affected by fuel and personnel airbaltic competing successfully with Ryanair and Easyjet Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines 19 Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines 2

Strong hotel market gives improved result of MSEK 81 26 25 Total revenues 1 466 1 96 EBITDA -3-78 EBT -65-146 Strong hotel market Result positively affected by Easter in April Number of rooms sold increased RevPAR up 2,6% for comparable units Occupancy rate improved 4,4 p.u. 7 new hotels opened in Q1. Total number of hotels now 224 Rezidor SAS 21 Radisson SAS, Frankfurt Spain Market: 11% Spanair: 35,6% Spanair expanding in Barcelona and Madrid 22 Market growth and growth for airlines Norway Market: 11% SK: 6,3% Challenging situation on Norway domestic, strong internationally Scandinavian Airlines Denmark Market: 6,2% SK: 8,7% Scandinavian Airlines Sweden Market: 5,4% SK: 2,4% Market share up on international flights Introduction of New Business Model successful on Europe Finland Market: 7,7% Blue1: 19,5% Blue1 taking market shares domestic and expanding on nine new European destinations Latvia & Lithuania Market: app 5% airbaltic: 55,9% Estonia Market: app 15% Estonian Air: 15% Capacity boom in the Baltics. airbaltic gains market shares in competition with Ryanair and Easyjet Three pillars of the competitiveness Tough start of 26, but passenger growth trend intact Cost Turnaround 25 New cost adaptation measures Cost at market levels Incorporation of Businesses units Transparency Local adaptation Flexibility Time to market New Business Models One way pricing Demand driven Internet in process Value for money 23 in process 24 Tough start of 26 Pilot action result effect appr MSEK 25 Cabin conflict in Norway New Business Models Solid traffic development Record load factors and number of passengers More commercial initiatives in pipeline Jet fuel costs more challenging and to be handled through Yield management Cost reductions Hedging Cost measures increased to SEK 2,5 billion Outlook Stable market growth 3-5% New Business Model with improved load Load up 7 p.u. in Scandinavian Airlines after Easter

1 9 8 7 74 74 71 7 66 65 64 64 6 5 4 3 2 1 Source: TOTQ 25, CFI Group 27 61 57 Additional slides for further information 26 Southwest Airlines Co. Blue1 Widerøe Continental Airlines, Inc. Scandinavian Airlines Delta Air Lines, Inc. American Airlines (AMR Corporation) Northwest Airlines Corporation United Airlines (UAL Corporation) US Airways Group, Inc. Customer satisfaction satisfactory but will be targeted for Scandinavian Airlines Four Business Areas as from 26 From business units to limited companies Closer to local markets Improved accountability 28

Group Revenue Business models for airlines -three common denominators Revenues growing in major business areas Commercial concept Traffic system Costs Change Price structures based on demand-driven oneway prices for simple online distribution Differentiated base product Add-on products that stimulate buy-up and ancillary revenues Value-for-money Traffic systems dimensioned for local passengers and for profitable transfer traffic Dynamic flexible traffic planning 1,5 1 4 3,5 1,5 1,1 6 5 3,9 3,7 6 5 Hotels Airline Support Businesses Group revenue distribution Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines Scandinavian Airlines Businesses 8,5 8 7,5 8,4 8,1 6 5 Cost level for basic product in line with most efficient players Additional costs for transfer, distribution, in-flight, on-ground, network etc. to be covered by a price premium 3,5 3 2,5 3,5 2,6 29 3 2 6 5 Revenue seasonality pattern EBITDAR and CFROI improved 1999 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 MSEK 26 25 Revenue 14 467 13 16 11,1% EBITDAR 219 222-1,4% EBITDAR-margin 1,5% 1,7% -,2 p.p. CFROI 13% 1% +3 p.p. jan feb mar apr maj jun jul aug sep okt nov dec 31 32

1 st Quarter seasonally weak Improvements in airlines and hotels EBITDAR improved by MSEK 1 649 MSEK, EBT before gains and nonrecurring items 1 5 1 5-5 -1-1 5-2 -2 5 1171 77 1 579 619 38 5116 184 228-13 -32-415 -591-647 -1319-131 -1312-163 -1613-199 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 7 6 5 4 3 2 1-1 -2 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 23 24 24 24 24 25 25 25 25 26 EBITDAR (12 months rolling) EBIT (12 months rolling) EBITDAR in Q1 was MSEK 219 (222) EBITDAR distribution Scandin Airl. MSEK 16 (-33) Spanair MSEK 143 (119) Widerøe MSEK 68 (8) Blue1 MSEK 11 (34) airbaltic MSEK 12 (-7) 33 21 22 23 24 25 26 Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines 34 EBIT-margin and revenues Very strong growth in many Group airlines Revenues MSEK 17 16 15 14 EBIT-margin 1,% 5,%,% Passenger growth in Q1 26 vs Q1 25 % 6 5 4 8,5 million passengers in Q1 - new record 11 1 35 13 12 1Q 23 2Q 23 3Q 23 4Q 23 Revenues 1Q 24 2Q 24 3Q 24 EBIT-margin 4Q 24 Q1 25 Q2 25 Q3 25 Q4 25 Q1 26-5,% -1,% -15,% 3 2 1-1 36 airbaltic Spanair Blue1 SK Denmark SAS Braathens SK Sweden SK International

Record high jet fuel prices Passengers growing most airlines Average market prices: 2 297 USD/MT 21 245 USD/MT 22 233 USD/MT 23 282 USD/MT 24 399 USD/MT 25 568 USD/MT Q1 25 487 USD/MT Q2 25 556 USD/MT Q3 25 634 USD/MT Q4 25 592 USD/MT Q1 26 615 USD/MT Hedge levels (including premiums): 41% hedged for 26 by May 26: 675 USD/MT Business areas 37 Scandinavian Airlines statement of income -March MSEK 26 25 Change Revenues 8 379 8 73 +36 Operating expenses -8 273-8 16-167 EBITDAR 16-33 +139 Lease -527-444 -83 EBITDA -421-477 +56 Depreciation -299-345 +46 Income from sales/affiliated 23 35-282 EBIT -697-517 -18 EBT -878-698 -18 EBT bef. nonrecurring items -813-988 +175 4

EBITDAR is improving Key airline profitability drivers EBITDAR, Scandinavian Airlines MSEK 2 1 5 1 5 26 vs 25 -March Traffic (RPK) up 1,3% Cabin Factor up 5,8 p.u. Yields (currency adjusted) up 1,2% Total unit costs up 7,1% Fuel adjusted unit cost up 3,% -5 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 22 23 24 25 26 41 42 Scandinavian Airlines Danmark strong cabin factor improvement more passengers SAS Braathens hit hard by conflict and low image actions taken to improve situation Signs of reduced overcapacity in the home market Negative effect from pilot conflict in Q1 MSEK 11 Positive situation between cabin factor and yield decline Solid traffic growth Traffic up 7,7% Capacity down 1,7% Cabin factor up 11,2 p.u. to 65,7% 26 Total revenues 2 313 2 233 EBITDAR -82-179 EBT -289-41 EBT weaker by MSEK 41 vs last year Negative effect from conflict in Q1 appr MSEK 14 Satisfactory traffic growth Traffic up 8,3% vs Q1 25 Cabin factor up 2,9 p.u. to 63,2% Over 4% internet bookings on domestic routes Capacity increasing with one aircraft as from March 26 11 new routes opened from Oslo, Bergen, Stavanger and Kristiansand 26 25 Total revenues 2 87 2 663 EBITDAR 43 234 EBT, bef nonrecurring items -156-88 Group Scandinavian Airlines Operations Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines Airline Support Airline Related Business Hotels 43 44

1 8 1 8 5 2 9 Scandinavian Airlines Sweden Q1 improved by MSEK 135 Scandinavian Airlines International Still fierce competition on Swedish domestic routes Cost reductions behind improved earnings Traffic up by 3,2% vs 25 Total cabin factor up 7,7 p.u. to 64,9% Yield down by 2,6% Pilots moved to Scandinavian Airlines Sweden in March New cooperation with City Airlines as from April 26 has improved service to/from Gothenburg Development in 1 st Quarter as expected Earnings improved although competition has increased Yield up 9,5% during the Quarter has compensated increased fuel costs Cabin factor improved 3,7 p.u. to 79,7% Several product improvements Internet onboard all aircraft Flat bed introduced 1 st Quarter 26 26 25 Total revenues 1 592 1 594 EBITDAR -36-89 EBT -234-255 Jan- 26 25 Total revenues 1 869 1 88 EBITDAR 16-39 EBT, bef nonrecc. -84-219 45 46 Yield has stabilized North Atlantic cabin factor stronger than North AEAAtlantic cabin factor above AEA 12-months rolling 1,3 1,25 1,2 1,15 1,1 1,5 dec-3 mar-4 jun-4 sep-4 dec-4 mar-5 jun-5 sep-5 dec-5 mar-6 47 %, RPK vs. Last year 8 6 4 2-2 -4 48 15 22 29 %, Cabin factor 95 9 85 8 75 7 65 April 36 43 15 July October April 22 29 36 Week 43 5 July October SAS AEA 12 19 26 33 April July 4 47 October Daily departures to/from New York, Washington DC, Chicago, Seattle from Copenhagen Daily departures to/from New York and Chicago from Stockholm Compared with 25 capacity has been reduced to New York and Washington DC resulting in improved cabin factors and lower volumes Positive mix Traffic in 26: European airlines (AEA) traffic down 1,5% SAS traffic down 12,5%

Strong traffic increase on Asian routes Cabin factor over AEA on European routes 1 13 25 37 49 9 21 33 45 8 2 32 44 4 16 28 4 52 12 %, RPK vs. Last year 12 1 8 6 4 2-2 -4-6 %, Cabin factor 95 9 85 8 75 7 65 6 55 5 SAS AEA 49 Week April July October April July October April July October April July October Positive mix between Economy and Business Class Good development in Economy Extra Cabin factor higher than AEA Traffic in 26: AEA traffic up 13,2% SAS traffic up 1,1% albeit capacity being reduced %, RPK vs. Last year 3 2 1-1 -2 %, Cabin factor 8 75 7 65 6 55 5 45 5 1 1 19 28 37 46 6 March May July September November March May July September November March May July September November March SAS AEA 15 24 33 42 51 8 17 26 35 44 1 1 Scandinavian Airlines has reduced its capacity by 6,2% in Q1 Scandinavian Airlines introduced one way fares in September which significantly has improved cabin factor further Cabin factor above AEA average since September Traffic 26: AEA traffic up 3,9% SAS traffic up 9,5% ECA agreement expires in 27 negative effect North in 26 Atlantic estimated cabin appr factor MSEK above 4 AEA Tri-party Joint Venture agreement with BMI, Lufthansa and SAS signed November 9, 1999 In effect from 1, 2 Main scope: To integrate the parties scheduled pass. transport to/ from London/ Manchester Negative result effect 22: MSEK 418 (335) Negative result effect 23: MSEK 244 Negative result effect 24: MSEK 134 Negative result effect 25: MSEK 415 Result effect 1st Quarter 26: MSEK 13 (-64) 51 Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines

Weaker 1 st Quarter Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines weaker than 25 -March MSEK 26 25 Change Revenues 3 514 2 67 +97 Operating expenses -3 318-2 67-711 EBITDAR 196 27-11 Lease -367-242 -125 EBITDA -171-35 -136 in MSEK Revenues 2 63 31% 721 12,8% 428 12,9% 287 49,5% EBITDAR 143 24 68-12 11-23 12 19 EBT bef nonrec. -235-77 -2-16 -26-22 -18-18 Depreciation -82-76 -6 Income from sales/affiliated 2-3 -5 EBIT -251-114 -137 EBT -281-145 -136 EBT before gains and nonreccuring items -281-145 -136 Negative Easter Effect in Spanair Start up costs Blue1 Challenges in Widerøe Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines 53 Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines 54 Spanair weaker due to different timing of Easter holiday and jet fuel Widerøe weaker due to higher technical costs and less competitive agreement with personnel Robust traffic development in first Quarter Number of passengers up 35,65 Cabin factor up 5,9 p.u. to 6,1% Jet fuel up 7% vs last year corresponding to MSEK 212 1 st Quarter negatively affected by Easter in April in 26 vs March in 25 26 25 Total revenues 2 63 1 574 EBITDAR 143 119 EBT, bef nonrecurring items -235-158 Traffic up 4,7% and cabin factor improved by 2,5 p.u. to 56,% Yield was down,3% in Q1 due to more low fare tickets in the market Unit cost up 6,9% due to jet fuel and costs for technical maintenance 26 25 Total revenues 721 639 EBITDAR 68 8 EBT, bef nonrecurring items -2 14 Passengers 12 months rolling 7 5 EBT, MSEK 7 6 5 6 5 5 1 8 6 4 2 24 25 26 5 4- dec 5- jan 5- feb 5- mar 5- apr may- 5-jun 5-jul 5-5 aug Spanair 5- sep oct- 5 5- nov 5- dec 6- jan 6- feb 6- mar -2-4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Jan- Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines 55 56

1 st Quarter negatively affected by phase in costs of new aircraft booking figures promising Continued strong growth but result negatively affected by fuel Start up cost with European expansion 9 new destinations introduced from Helsinki Booking figures on tourist destinations are promising Strong traffic figures in Q1 Passengers up 19,5% Traffic up 23,8% Cabin factor up 5,5 p.u. to 59,5% 26 25 Total revenues 428 379 EBITDAR 11 34 EBT, bef nonrecurring items -26-4 EBT improved MSEK 15 due to improved utilization Strong traffic development Number of passengers up 55,9% Cabin factor improved 8,8 p.u. to 59,% Unit cost up 7,7% negatively affected by fuel and personnel airbaltic competing successfully with Ryanair and Easyjet 26 25 Total revenues 287 192 EBITDAR 12-7 EBT, bef nonrecurring items -18-33 Number of passengers airbaltic 12 1 8 6 4 2 Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines 57 58 12 month rolling Month Estonian Air shows solid growth The holds 49% in Estonian Air Estonian Air number of passengers up 9% in Q1 Competitive cost position Increasing charter operation Number of passengers Estonian Air 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Apr Aug Okt Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines Apr Aug Okt Apr Aug 12 month rolling Monthly figures Oct Airline Support Businesses 59

Airline Support Businesses -March MSEK 26 25 Change Revenues 3 711 3 879-168 Operating expensives -3 589-3 578 +11 EBITDA 122 31-179 Depreciation -69-132 +63 EBIT 35 169-134 EBT 18 136-118 EBT bef nonrecurring items 39 136-97 Airline Support Businesses 61 62 Significant improved occupancy rate RevPAR improves 8% 7% 6% 5% 75% 7% 65% RevPAR (EUR), 12 months rolling value 75 7 65 6 4% Rezidor SAS 2-jan Mar Sept 3-jan Mar Sept Occupancy rate 4-jan Mar Sep 12 month rolling Jan Mar Sep Jan 6% 55 5 Rezidor SAS jun-2 jun-3 jun-4 jun-5 63 64

Balance sheet Financial update MSEK 31 Mar 6 31 5 Liquid funds 8 864 8 684 Aircraft, spare parts 15 552 16 27 Other assets 33 312 33 125 Total assets 57 728 58 16 Operating liabilities 17 83 15 981 Interest-bearing liabilities 25 194 26 337 Deferred tax 3 537 3 617 Equity 11 167 12 81 Total liabilities and equity 57 728 58 16 Financial net debt 14 53 14 228 Group Mainline Airline Operations Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines Airline Support Business Airline Related Business Hotels 65 66 Limited CAPEX has SEK 14 billion in available funds improvement by SEK 3,5 billion Firm Aircraft Orders Total 26 27 Airbus A319 4 2 2 Boeing 737 2 2 Number of aircraft 6 2 4 CAPEX (MUSD) 161 52 19 March 6 March 5 Change Liquid Funds MSEK 8 86 7 659 +1 21 Available Credit Facilites: Revolving Credit Facility (MEUR 4) 3 759 9 +2 859 Bi-lateral Facilities 1 5 2-5 Others 347 4-53 Total Available Facilities 5 66 3 3 +2 36 Total Available Funds 14 466 1 959 +3 57 Available facilities MSEK 5 66 Utilized facilities MSEK 1 44 Total facilities MSEK 6 65 67 68

CAPEX holiday continues Key financial ratios and future targets MSEK 69 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 F 27F Amortization profile of interest bearing liabilities Key figures Mar 6 5 Target Equity/assets ratio (solidity) 19% 21% >3% Financial net debt/ equity 126% 118% <5% Fin. net debt+7*oplease/ equity 326% 29% <1% 7 Targets will be reached by: New Business Models and rationalization Capital Release: Aircraft phase-outs Other Assets (Properties, non-core subsidiaries etc) Cash flow from operations Financial Net -March 26 vs last year (MSEK) Q1-26 Q1-25 Difference Interest net and others -226-229 +3 Revolving credit facility Exchange rate differences -13 +13 Financial net - 226-242 +16 71 72

Development and break down of Financial Net Debt since year end Development and break down of Financial Net Debt since last year (MSEK) 6331 51231 Difference Cash 8 864 8 684 +18 Other interest bearing assets 2 277 3 425-1 148 Interest bearing liabilities -25 194-26 337 +1 143 Financial Net debt -14 53-14 228 + 175 (MSEK) 6331 5331 Difference Cash 8 864 7 659 +1 25 Other interest bearing assets 2 277 2 327-5 Interest bearing liabilities -25 194-26 41 +1 216 Financial Net debt -14 53-16 424 + 2 371 73 74 Development of Financial Net Debt Equity/Asset ratio 5% 45% 4% 35% 3% 25% 2% 15% 1% 5% % 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 25 75 76

Financial net debt/equity ratio Gearing ratios weaker in Q1 2,5 2,3 2, 1,8 1,5 1,3 1,,8,5,3, 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 25 35% 3% 25% 2% 15% 1% 5% % dec- 98 dec- 99 dec- Net Debt / Equity dec- 1 Equity / Total Assets dec- mar- jun- 2 3 3 sep- 3 dec- mar- jun- 3 4 4 sep- 4 dec- mar- jun- 4 5 5 Fin Net Debt / Equity sep- dec mar- 5 6 Fin. Net Debt + 7*Op lease / Equity 77 78 Credit postion Sum up Solid liquidity of MSEK 8 864 Substantial Committed credit facilities of MSEK 5 66 Credit facilities of MSEK 933 amortized in Q1 Limited CAPEX in 26-27 Streamlining of Group New cost adaptive measures under implementation and increased to SEK 2,5 billion Positive cash flow from operations Loss carry forward will improve tax position APPENDICES Traffic Data Yield Unit cost Fleet Financial key figures 79 8

Yield development 26 vs 25 Improved load factors and stable yild Total Scheduled 26 25 Change Yield (öre/rpk) 114,7 18,2 6,% Currency adj. yield 114,7 113,4 1,2% 81 82 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3-nov 4-jan 4-mar 4-maj 4-jul Load factor 4-sep 4-nov 5-jan 5-mar 5-may 5-jul Yield (12 months rolling) 5-sep 5-nov 6-jan 6-mar 1,3 1,3 1,2 1,2 1,1 1,1 1, Yield development Scandinavian Airlines Businesses Passenger yield -March 26 % 1 5-5 -1-15 -2 Q1 vs 23 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 vs 24 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Yields down 9,1% in 24 Yields down,3 in 25 Yield up 1,2% in Q1 26 Nominal Currency Adjusted Route Sector yield effect yield Scandinavian Airlines Busin. 16 95 11 Intercontinental 117 93 19 Europe 99 94 93 Intrascandinavian 96 95 91 Denmark 114 95 18 Norway 16 95 11 Sweden 14 99 13 24 vs 23 25 vs 24 26 vs 25 83 84

Yield development 26 vs 25 Unit cost development Yield, local currency 2,4% -,3% -8,5% -6,8% Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines 85 86 Unit up in Q1 due to increased fuel costs, conflict in and reduced capacity Bock hours overview Total unit cost, 8% 3% -2% -7% -12% Unit cost down 1,9% in 24 Unit cost down 1,7% in 25 Unit cost up 7,1% in Q1 Adjusted for fuel, unit cost was up by 3,% due to conflict and reduced capacity 12 months rolling Apr 5 -Mar 6 Air craft/day Pilots/year Cabin/year 8, 547 628 Spanair Widerøe Blue1 8,2 6,9 8, 666 471 682 789 439 664 airbaltic 8,8 778 743-17% 1st Q 23 3rd Q 23 1st Q 24 3rd Q 24 1st Q 25 3rd Q 25 1st Q 26 87 88

Key productivity ratios Self Service check in and internet check close to 5% and Internet Check in over 5% Internet check low, but increasing Aircraft utilization (12 month roling) 8,5 8 7,5 7 Cabin, pilot utilization (12 month roling) 67 62 57 55% 5% 45% 4% 6,5 6 5,5 5 Apr Aug Oct Apr Aug Oct 52 47 42 Apr Aug Oct Cabin crew Apr Pilots Aug Oct 35% 3% 25% 2% 2211 232 235 238 Automat 2311 242 245 248 2411 252 255 258 2511 262 Automat+internet 89 9 Long term passenger cabin factor trend positive USD has been stronger in 26 vs 25 affecting costs negatively Moving 12 months values 74% 72% 7% 68% 66% 64% 62% 12 11 1 9 8 7 6 23 22 21 2 24 25 26 6% DEC94 DEC95 DEC96 DEC97 DEC98 DEC99 DEC DEC1 DEC2 DEC3 DEC4 DEC5 DEC6 91 92

Currency effect -March 26 vs 25 Currency effect -March 26 vs 25 93 MSEK Total revenues +62 Total costs -86 Forward cover costs & working cap. +18 Income before depr. -6 Financial items +13 Income before tax -47 Total revenues & costs: (Total 24 MSEK) Major approx. effects: USD -368 DKK -17 NOK +78 EUR +17 Asian curr. +32 All others +18 Forward cover costs: (Total +88 MSEK) 25-42 26 +4 94 Working capital: (Total +92MSEK) 25-63 26 +29 Financial items: (Total +13 MSEK) 25-13 26 Grand total -47 MSEK Currency distribution in the 25 fleet March 26 NOK 28% Revenues SEK 21% USD 7% Others 4% DKK 11% SEK 18% Expenses USD 26% Others 2% DKK 14% Owned Leased Total Leased out On order Airbus A33/A34 5 6 11 Airbus A321/A32/A319 7 22 29 4 Boeing 737-serien 22 54 76 5 2 Boeing 717 (MD-95) 4 4 Douglas MD-8-serien 23 66 89 5 Douglas MD-9-serien 8 8 3 Avro RJ-85/1 9 9 Fokker F5 2 6 8 2 dehavilland Q-serien 17 37 54 SAAB 2 5 5 Totalt 84 29 293 15 6 GBP 5% EUR 24% NOK 19% GBP 3% EUR 18% Scandinavian Airlines 68 123 191 15 6 Spanair 58 58 Wideroe 16 14 3 Blue1 14 14 Total 84 29 293 15 6 95 96

Development of Market Capitalization SAS share 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 jan-3 maj-3 sep-3 jan-4 maj-4 sep-4 jan-5 maj-5 sep-5 jan-6 97 98 SAS share up significantly more than index since ember 24 Number of SAS trades share continues to increase 99 SAS Market Capitalization vs. European Peers measured in SEK (ember 31, 24 - March 31, 26) 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 1, 9, 8, 7, 3- jan- 5 3- feb- 5 3- mar- 5 3- apr- 5 3- maj- 5 3-3- 3-3- jun- jul- aug- sep- 5 5 5 5 Index peers 3-3- 3- okt- nov- dec- 5 5 5 Index SAS * Peers: Alitalia, Air France, British Airways, Easyjet, Finnair, Lufthansa & Ryanair 3- jan- 6 3- feb- 6 3- mar- 6 181,7 138,3 1 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Number of shares traded in SAS per month 24 25 26 ruary March April May e July August September October November ember