NUMBER CRUNCHING FOR DUMMIES. Collecting, Identifying, Presenting, and Developing an Effective Planning Strategy Amid Billions and Billions of Records

Similar documents
Monthly Ridership Report. Local Network (Local Bus Service + Light Rail Service) & Commuter Network (Park & Ride Service)

Monthly Ridership Report

December 2014 (Fiscal Year 2015) Monthly Ridership Report METROBus and METRORail

August 2014 (Fiscal Year 2014) Monthly Ridership Report METROBus and METRORail

JUNE 2011 (Fiscal Year 2011) Monthly Ridership Report METROBus and METRORail

OCTOBER 2012 (Fiscal Year 2013) Monthly Ridership Report METROBus and METRORail

June 2015 (Fiscal Year 2015)

Juneau Comprehensive Operations Analysis and Transit Development Plan DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS January 2014

4. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING RIDERSHIP AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE

Planning, Engineering & Construction Department September 2017

METRONext PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PHASE I

Lessons Learned from Rebuilding the Muni Subway Schedule Leslie Bienenfeld

8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT

Silver Line Operating Plan

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

2010 MTA Financial Plan & Proposed LIRR Service Reductions Supplemental Information. MTA Long Island Rail Road

Approved Juvenile Processing Offices

Why we re here: For educational purposes only

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015

Word Count: 3,565 Number of Tables: 4 Number of Figures: 6 Number of Photographs: 0. Word Limit: 7,500 Tables/Figures Word Count = 2,250

DEMOGRAPHICS AND EXISTING SERVICE

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER Performance Management Office

FY Year End Performance Report

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT DECEMBER 2015

Mobile Farebox Repair Program: Setting Standards & Maximizing Regained Revenue

Title VI Service Monitoring Program

Business Intelligence Development at Winnipeg Transit

HOW TO IMPROVE HIGH-FREQUENCY BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY THROUGH SCHEDULING

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

Chapter 3. Burke & Company

October REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California

Fixed-Route Operational and Financial Review

2018 Service Implementation Plan Executive Summary

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

Mount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! wmata.com/bus

ACRP Problem Statement No Recommended Allocation: -- ACRP Airport Baggage Handling Opportunity

Attachment C: 2017/2018 Halifax Transit Year End Performance Report. 2017/2018 Year End Performance Measures Report

METRO OPERATIONS COMMITTEE

Demand-Responsive Transportation in the TCQSM

Sound Transit Operations December 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Bristol Virginia Transit

PLEASE READ Proposal for Sustainable Service

Service Performance 2017 Networked Family of Services

Sound Transit Service Standards and Performance Measures Edition

CHAPTER 5: Operations Plan

1 DEMAND RESPONSE OVERVIEW

TTI REVIEW OF FARE POLICY: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

PUBLIC TRANSIT IN KENOSHA, RACINE, AND MILWAUKEE COUNTIES

A Tour Across America s Managed Lanes Mike Heiligenstein, Executive Director Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority

SUB-REGIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Sound Transit Operations March 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

October 12th 2015 DRAFT Service Implementation Plan

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Services Utilization Study

Transit Fare Review Phase 2 Discussion Guide

Metro. Board Report. File #: , File Type: Informational Report Agenda Number: 25

1 YORK REGION TRANSIT/ VIVA SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

GREENBELT-BWI THURGOOD MARSHALL AIRPORT EXPRESS LINE ROUTE B30

PTN-128 Reporting Manual Data Collection and Performance Reporting

METROPOLITAN EVANSVILLE TRANSIT SYSTEM Part I: Comprehensive Operations Analysis Overview July 9 th, 2015 Public Information Meeting

Report by Finance Committee (B) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

RTD s Performance Management System

PERFORMANCE REPORT JANUARY Keith A. Clinkscale Performance Manager

Presentation to Board of Directors on All-Door Boarding System-wide Implementation

2.0 Miami-Dade Transit System Overview

Call for Public Hearing August 2019 Service Changes

Sound Transit Operations August 2015 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Orange County Transportation Authority Fare Integration Project A Regional Approach

LODI CITY COUNCIL Carnegie Forum 305 West Pine Street, Lodi

Rochester Genesee Regional Transportation Authority

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

CobbLinc Forward Service Package

Quality of Life Study

CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards

Prior to reviewing the various performances of Red Apple Transit, it is important to point out some key terminology, including:

Matt Miller, Planning Manager Margaret Heath-Schoep, Paratransit & Special Projects Manager

Sound Transit Operations June 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Alternatives: Strategies for Transit Systems Change

Table of Contents. List of Tables

Regional Fare Change Overview. Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit

Follow-up to Proposed Fare Changes for FY2013

CHERRIOTS 2018 SERVICE PLAN 1

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Ridership Growth Strategy (RGS) Status Update

BaltimoreLink Implementation Status Report

DRT Performance Measurement: the U.S. Experience

September 2014 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management Sub-Regional Report PERFORMANCE MEASURES

15. Supplementary Notes Supported by a grant from the Office of the Governor of the State of Texas, Energy Office

Manual vs. Automatic Operation and Operational Restrictions

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

METROLIFT RESOURCE NOTEBOOK

S Between Grand Central Station and Times Square, Manhattan

RTA ScoreCard December 2009

Approval of August 2019 Service Changes

FY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission

UNIT TITLE: CONSTRUCT AND TICKET DOMESTIC AIRFARES

Greater Portland Transit District

Transcription:

NUMBER CRUNCHING FOR DUMMIES Collecting, Identifying, Presenting, and Developing an Effective Planning Strategy Amid Billions and Billions of Records Jim Archer Mary Lawrence METRO Houston, TX

Houston METRO Category Service Area By The Numbers 1,303 sq. mi. Boardings / Routes (FY2016) Local Bus 58.9M 83 routes Park & Ride Bus 8.5M 30 routes Light Rail 18.5M 3 lines Paratransit 1.9M Bus Stops 9,100 Passenger Shelters 2,200

IN THE BEGINNING o Operators manually recorded boardings, then transcribed to paper forms o Traffic checkers manually recorded boardings, alightings, and passenger loads on paper forms o Data entry clerks entered information entered into computers o Lots and lots of paper QUANTITY: Determined by manual staff / staff ability QUALITY: High variability DECISION MAKING FOCUS Data or Professional Judgement? PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT

THOSE WERE THE DAYS o Operators logged in to electronic registering fare boxes / bus card readers o Traffic checkers manually recorded boardings, alightings, and passenger loads on paper forms for reasonableness checks o Less paper / more automation o Information entered into computers by data entry clerks QUANTITY: Determined by log-in / manual staff size QUALITY: Less variability DECISION MAKING FOCUS Data or Professional Judgement? PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT

BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF RECORDS With automatic passenger counters on 100% of buses, you get: WEEKDAYS SINGLE DAY MONTHLY (20 weekdays) A. Scheduled Trips 8,807 176,140 B. Average # of Stops 75 75 C. Fields of Data 45 45 D. A x B x C 29,723,625 594,472,500 % Available Next Day 85 90% % Available 4 th Day 90 95% QUANTITY: High QUALITY: Minimal variability DECISION MAKING FOCUS Data or Professional Judgement? DATA / PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT

SO WHAT S MOST IMPORTANT? One approach APC DATA (Bus) WHO USES IT Boardings Overall NTD, Board, Planning, Scheduling, Peer Boardings By Route NTD, External, Planning, Scheduling, Peer Boardings / Alightings By Bus Stop NTD, Planning, Scheduling Maximum Customer Loads Title VI, Planning, Scheduling Seating Capacity Utilization Planning, Scheduling # / % of Trips with Standing Loads Title VI, Planning, Scheduling Service Reliability By Route Title VI, Scheduling Service Reliability By Day Scheduling Service Reliability By Segment Scheduling

DATA-DRIVEN OR PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT? It s not a case of one being inherently better than the other It s not a case of either or Whenever possible, use both

WHEN 1 1 SEATING CAPACITY 40 Transit Bus 1997: 45 seats 2007: 38 seats 2017: 34 seats We ve lost nearly a quarter of our seats! ACTUAL SITUATION: o Bus route has 40 one-way trips o Equipment has 25 seats o ERF reports 1,060 boardings o Previous month 650 boardings o Maximum in previous 12 months was 680 boardings o Staff member enters 1,060 What s wrong with this picture?

WHEN IT RAINS o Average Sunday ridership was 11% less on days with measureable rain than on non-rain, non-holiday weekends Description # of Days Average day, no weather or holiday impact 29 Heavy measureable rainfall 11 Holiday 5 Heavy measureable rainfall and holiday 3 TOTAL 48

WHEN DATA AND IDEOLOGY COLLIDE

4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM WHEN DATA AND IDEOLOGY COLLIDE 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 - Average Weekday Boardings by Hour Time Period Green (Coverage) Routes By Route February 2016 003 Langley 005 Southmore 10 Willowbend 23 W. 43rd - Clay 30 Clinton - Ella 39 Katy Freeway 48 Market 58 Hammerly 59 Aldine Mail 64 Lincoln City 66 Quitman 67 Dairy Ashford 70 Memorial 71 Cottage Grove 72 Westview 75 Eldridge 76 Evergreen 77 Homestead 78 Wayside 79 West Little York 83 Lee Road 87 Sunnyside 88 Sagemont 96 Veterans Memorial 97 Settegast 98 Briargate 99 Ella- FM1960 360 Peerless 399 Kuykendahl

KNOWN RIDERSHIP GENERATORS Passenger Shelters Adding shelters with existing high ridership = 20% increase / stop Schedules InfoPanel Program (predated next-bus-texting) with schedules in shelters on select routes = 310K increase in 18 months Maps Post-Hurricane Katrina issuance led to growth on entire system

KNOWN RIDERSHIP GENERATOR o Increased frequency on routes with high ridership levels o Increased frequency 7-days per week o Elimination of branches

NEW BUS NETWORK Average Sunday: +33% Average Saturday: +18% On-Time Performance: + 7% Total Network: +8% BUT Average Weekday, Other Texas Properties: -8% 60,000 55,000 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 Pre-NBN and NBN Monthly Local Network Boardings (in 000s) 54,100 58,600 Average Weekday Allocation 20.7% New Bus Network 8.1% 0.7% 70.5 % RED BLUE GREEN OTHER 18.7% 40.0% Previous Network 0.5% 40.8 % - Pre-NBN NBN Pre-NBN NBN RED BLUE GREEN OTHER

EFFECTIVE USE OF DATA Determine what s most critical Analyze what you have Try presenting in different ways for different audiences Adjust as needed

For future information james.archer@ridemetro.org (713) 739-6820 mary.lawrence@ridemetro.org (713) 739-6881