Mackay. Social Indicators te.queensland.com/research

Similar documents
Brisbane. Social Indicators te.queensland.com/research

Tropical North Queensland

Cruise tourism in Akaroa: Visitor experiences, business stakeholder perceptions, and community attitudes Michael Shone & Jude Wilson 31 July 2013

Tourism Industry Council Tasmania Community Survey 2018 Research Report. May 2018

Mood of the Nation New Zealanders' perceptions of international visitors. March 2018

The Masterplan. This is our report from the first phase of consultation.

OUTDOOR RECREATION IN GRAZUTE REGIONAL PARK

Tourism. Trends*Importance*Effects*Eco-Tourism

Summary Report. Economic Impact Assessment for Beef Australia 2015

Mood of the Nation New Zealanders' perceptions of international visitors

Lake Placid Assessment Updated November 2008

Land area 1.73 million km 2 Queensland population (as at December 2016) Brisbane population* (preliminary estimate as at 30 June 2016)

Land area 1.73 million km 2 Queensland population (as at 31 December 2017) Brisbane population* (preliminary estimate as at 30 June 2017)

SHORT BREAKS TO NSW INTRODUCTION

Topic At Hand RTM 300. The issue we chose to discuss is tourism and the affects it has on the host communities.

Tourism Impacts and Second Home Development in Pender County: A Sustainable Approach

Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Northern Australia

The Economic Benefits of Agritourism in Missouri Farms

Tourism Impacts and Second Home Development in Coastal Counties: A Sustainable Approach

Puhoi to Pakiri Area Visitor Strategy Research Programme:

Tourism. Greater Affluence. Greater mobility. Improved accessibility and transport facilities. More leisure time. Changing lifestyles

COMMUNITY BASED TOURISM DEVELOPMENT (A Case Study of Sikkim)

Benefits and costs of tourism for remote communities

Domestic VFR travel to NSW

Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies Interfleet Transport Opinion Survey (TOPS) Quarter 3, September 2011

Queensland infrastructure research

VISITOR EXPECTATIONS SECTION

Economic Impact of Tourism in South Dakota, December 2017

2013 IRVING HOTEL GUEST SURVEY Final Project Report

What will Mackay be like in 5 years time?

Agritourism in Missouri: A Profile of Farms by Visitor Numbers

Salt Lake Downtown Alliance. June 2018

Caribbean Regional Sustainable Tourism Development Programme

Mackay Region. Destination Tourism Strategy

Mood of the Nation New Zealanders' perceptions of international tourism November 2016 TNS

Mood of the Nation. A study into the perceptions held by Australian consumers with respect to the size and value of Australia s tourism industry

State of the States October 2017 State & territory economic performance report. Executive Summary

REVIEW OF THE CRUISE INDUSTRY ACTION PLAN

Identifying the potential for the Australia VFR market to grow New Zealand tourism. Full report May 2018

Employment Characteristics of Tourism Industries, 2011

Estonia. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

Land area 1.73 million km 2 Queensland population (December 2015) Brisbane population* (June 2015)

Gold Coast. Rapid Transit. Chapter twelve Social impact. Chapter content

From: OECD Tourism Trends and Policies Access the complete publication at: Japan

Introduction 3. Accommodation 4. Ireland Market 5. Activity Providers, Attractions, Retail, Restaurants and Transport 6. Overseas Market Performance 7

Byron Shire Visitor Profile and Satisfaction Report: Summary and Discussion of Results

LOCAL AREA TOURISM IMPACT MODEL. Wandsworth borough report

Public Transport for Perth in 2031

Queensland Economic Update

PUHOI TO PAKIRI VISITOR SURVEY UPDATE. ( Simon Milne New Zealand Tourism Research Institute

Ontario Arts and Culture Tourism Profile Executive Summary

T A S M A N I A N G A M B L I N G S E I S I S S U E S P A P E R. Background on the Social and Economic Impact Study of Gambling

Gold Coast: Modelled Future PIA Queensland Awards for Planning Excellence 2014 Nomination under Cutting Edge Research category

From: OECD Tourism Trends and Policies Access the complete publication at:

National Touring Survey Report

TRENDS AND PROSPECTS FOR THE CAIRNS / TROPICAL NORTH QUEENSLAND ECONOMY PRESENTATION TO PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS CAIRNS

CHAPTER THREE Profile of, and Direct Economic Impacts from, Florida Heritage Tourism

The Coalition s Policy

The Economic Impact of the 2015 ASICS Los Angeles Marathon. September 2015

An Assessment of the Economic Impacts of Cultural Heritage Projects in Georgia and Macedonia

Destination Orkney. The Orkney Tourism Strategy Summary

POP UP LEASING BROCHURE TO LEARN MORE VISIT LENDLEASE.COM/POPUPRETAIL

The Travel and Tourism Industry in Vermont. A Benchmark Study of the Economic Impact of Visitor Expenditures on the Vermont Economy 2005

Introduction 3. Accommodation 4. Ireland Market 5. Activity Providers, Attractions, Retail and Transport 6. Overseas Market Performance 7.

LORD HOWE ISLAND MARINE PARK PROFILE OF LOCAL BUSINESSES. Department of Environment Climate Change & Water. Prepared For: Prepared By:

Inland Queensland Roads Action Plan

Economic Impact Analysis. Tourism on Tasmania s King Island

Cotswolds destination report

Fall 2015 Brand & Advertising Tracking Study Report US Near Markets

2015 SAN DIEGO VISITOR PROFILE

Nature Based Tourism in Australia Manifesto

Cultural and Heritage Tourism to NSW

INQUIRY INTO THE OPERATION, REGULATION AND FUNDING OF AIR ROUTE SERVICE DELIVERY TO RURAL, REGIONAL AND REMOTE COMMUNITIES

Economic Impact of Tourism in South Dakota, December 2018

Economic Impact of Kalamazoo-Battle Creek International Airport

Destination Visitor Survey Strategic Regional Research Queensland: Understanding the Queensland Touring Group

South Australian Tourism Industry Council SA Tourism Barometer March Quarter 2015

Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies (ITLS) Transport Opinion Survey (TOPS) Quarter 1, March 2017

Responsible Tourism and the Market Harold Goodwin 2001

TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION TO THE GREATER SYDNEY COMMISSION LANDS AT ARTARMON

Stronger Economies Together

REAUTHORISATION OF THE ALLIANCE BETWEEN AIR NEW ZEALAND AND CATHAY PACIFIC

Ecotourism land tenure and enterprise ownership: Australian case study

OVERVIEW Four year annual average to the year ending September 2014

Consumer Travel Insights by STR

Sunshine Coast: Kawana Health Campus. December 2013

Consumer Council for Northern Ireland response to Department for Transport Developing a sustainable framework for UK aviation: Scoping document

Brand Health Survey. Conducted by the Brand Tasmania Council December 2015 and January brandtasmania.com

US Spa Industry Study

2015 IRVING HOTEL GUEST SURVEY Final Project Report

Professor Michael Davidson, Griffith University (Project Leader)

OVERVIEW Four year annual average to the year ending September 2014

Blue Mountains Visitors. International overnight, domestic overnight and domestic daytrip visitors. Sep-11. Jun-11. Sep-10. Dec-10. Dec-11.

Australian Cities Accounts Estimates. December 2011

Tourism Impacts and Second Home Development in Brunswick County: A Sustainable Approach. Summary Report

SYDNEY S SECOND AIRPORT

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Walworth County, Wisconsin. July 2013

CULTURAL & HERITAGE TOURISM IN AUSTRALIA APRIL 2016

HIGH-END ECOTOURISM AS A SUSTAINABLE LAND USE OPTION IN RURAL AFRICA:

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION

Transcription:

Mackay Social Indicators 2013 This study examines the social impacts of tourism on the local communities, as perceived by its residents. The research is intended to inform the decision making of state and local authorities, as well as tourism bodies. 87% of residents agree that festivals and events attract tourists and raise awareness of the region ithe Mackay region is characterised by its strong and multifaceted economy. The mining boom and growth in ancillary industries has prompted corresponding growth in the region s population. Sixty-nine per cent of residents have lived in the region for 10 years or less. Home to around ii 116,000 residents, just over half (52%) are happy with their quality of life and surroundings, but can also think of other places they might equally enjoy. The emphasis on major employers like mining, construction and retail has failed to diminish the belief among locals that the tourism industry has a role to play in creating positive outcomes for their community. Two in three (66%) residents like tourists. Many (59%) are comfortable with the way tourism is developing, while one in five (17%) would like to see the industry grow through initiatives like improved and affordable tourist infrastructure and more ecotourism experiences. Of the region s iii 792,000 domestic and international overnight visitors (748,000 and 44,000 respectively) in 2013, the majority were regional Queenslanders, either on business or visiting friends and relatives. Two thirds of Mackay residents feel there is scope to increase that number and more should be done to attract tourists to the area. Feelings about local area and tourists Feelings about local area Feelings about the number of tourists I like it, I can t think of anywhere else 39 37 29 28 I would rather live I enjoy living here but can think of other 50 50 52 59 places I would enjoy equally I only live here because circumstances 12 13 19 14 demand it and would prefer to live somewhere else Want more tourists 45 43 64 64 About the same number 50 50 33 31 Want fewer tourists 6 8 3 5 te.queensland.com/research

The majority of Mackay residents are positive about the impact of tourism on the community with half rating it +2 or +3. At a broader level agreement on the benefits to the community show a consistent upturn. Greater cultural diversity (96% compared with 91% in 2010) Important economic benefits (92% compared with 87% in 2010), and Increased regional profile (90% compared with 76% in 2010). Those living in Mackay City are more likely than the rest of the region to agree that tourism results in important economic benefits. However, on the whole (87%) residents believe festivals and events are great ways to attract tourists and raise awareness of the region. I think local festivals and facilities are a great bonus for our community. Mackay region resident 2013 In keeping with this general upsurge, residents are less likely to agree with their Queensland counterparts when it comes to the negative impacts from tourism, including: Increased prices (44% compared with QLD 56%) Negative impact on local charter (20% compared with QLD 29%) Negative impact on the environment (21% compared with QLD 29%); and More disruption (12% compared with QLD 32%). The only exception to the trend is in response to the impact of increased property values on the community (27% rated it -2 or -3 compared with 16% of all Queenslanders). 64% of residents feel that their local area should be trying to attract more tourists Contact with Tourists, Feelings and Development Feelings about tourists I like tourists 57# 49 66 68 I tolerate tourists 31$ 35 28 23 Contact with tourists Preferred development growth I adjust my lifestyle to avoid tourists 10 10 5 3 I stay away from places tourists go 3$ 5 2$ 7 I never come into contact with tourists 22# 18 16 19 I see tourists around but 51 52 50 54 don t usually talk to them I often interact with tourists as part of my job 10$ 13 6 11 I often meet tourists around town 15 14 15 12 and talk to them I have made friends with tourists during 7 7 14# 6 their stay, but have not kept in contact I have made friends with tourists and 4 5 4 5 kept in contact after they have left Happy with continued growth 59 59 59 63 Happy but no more growth 25 25 21# 13 Want less tourism 3$ 6 3 5 More growth different direction 13# 10 17 19 te.queensland.com/research 2

Respondents were asked to rate the overall impact tourism has on their community as a whole, using a seven point scale ranging from very negatively (-3) to very positively (+3). In 2013, 51% of Mackay residents rated the impact of tourism on their community as positive, scoring a +2 or +3, similar to the ratings from the 2010 survey. One per cent of residents rated the impact of tourism on their community negatively, with a -3 or -2 in 2013. Overall Impacts of Tourism 2013 1 46 1 51 2 3 51 49 2010 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Respondents were then asked to nominate if they agree or disagree with the following impacts of tourism. Below is the proportion of respondents that agree with each impact. Positive Impacts of Tourism Very Negatively -3 * Question wording changed from 2010 ** New statement included in 2013 - Data not available -2 Very Positively 3+ More interesting things to do 62# 54 48 44 Important economic benefits 91# 87 92 87 Improved facility maintenance 69# 60 56 63 Increased local pride 72# 65 76 69 Increased regional profile 86# 76 90# 76 New infrastructure 68# 60 53 53 Greater cultural diversity 92# 89 96# 91 * Benefits of tourism shared evenly 38-39 - ** Festivals and events attract tourists 87-87 - and raise awareness Those that agree with the positive statement were then asked to rate the affect it has on their community as a whole using a seven point scale ranging from very negatively (-3) to very positively (+3). Below are the scores of those respondents who gave a rating of +2 or +3. Positive affect on the community as a whole. Positive affect on the community as a whole. Those that rated the affect +2 or +3. Those that rated the affect +2 or +3. More interesting things to do 53$ 65 56 62 Important economic benefits 45$ 58 48$ 59 Improved facility maintenance 43$ 53 44 51 Increased local pride 39$ 50 38 49 Increased regional profile 40$ 52 38$ 51 New infrastructure 49$ 65 58 66 Greater cultural diversity 29$ 32 28 30 * Benefits of tourism shared evenly 41-46 - ** Festivals and events attract tourists 49-51 - and raise awareness % positive affect is based on the proportion of respondents who cited the top two ratings on a seven point scale ranging from very negative (-3) to very positive (+3). * Question wording changed from 2010 ** New statement included in 2013 - Data not available Base: Those that agree with each statement -1 No Effect 0 te.queensland.com/research 3 1+ 2+

Negative Impacts of Tourism Respondents were asked to nominate if they agree or disagree with the following impacts of tourism. Below is the proportion of respondents that agree with each impact. Increased opportunity costs 27 25 28 20 More disruption 32 31 12 17 Rise in delinquent behaviour 35 36 31 29 Negative impact on the environment 29 29 21 20 Increased prices 56# 53 44 47 Lack of access for locals 17 16 10 8 Negative impact on local character 29 29 20 21 Increased property values 41$ 45 38 41 Those that agree with the negative statement were then asked to rate the affect it has on their community as a whole using a seven point scale ranging from very negatively (-3) to very positively (+3). Below are the scores of those respondents who gave a rating or -2 or -3. Negative affect on the community as a whole. Negative affect on the community as a whole. Those that rated the affect -3 or -2. Those that rated the affect -3 or -2. Increased opportunity costs 15$ 24 12$ 32 More disruption 14$ 24 - - Rise in delinquent behaviour 22$ 31 30 25 Negative impact on the environment 18$ 31 26 34 Increased prices 13$ 18 12$ 30 Lack of access for locals 18$ 28 - - Negative impact on local character 8 11 7 15 Increased property values 16$ 25 27 30 % negative affect is based on the proportion of respondents who cited the top two ratings on a seven point scale ranging from very negative (-3) to very positive (+3). - Data not available Base: Those that agree with each statement te.queensland.com/research 4

Demographics Life stage 2013 2013 Under 45 years, no children 26 23 Under 45 years, with children 23 29 45 years or more, no children 40 35 Years of residence 45 years or more, with children 11 12 Less than 2 years 18 23 2-5 years 20 19 6-10 years 21 27 11-20 years 23 10 Place of birth More than 20 years 17 21 Within 50km of where you currently live 21 16 Elsewhere in Queensland 22 40 Elsewhere in Australia 32 26 Directly benefit from tourism (e.g. work in or own a business that profits from tourists or rent a property to tourists) Income In another country 24 18 Personal benefit 10 7 Family benefit 10 13 No benefit 84 85 Less than $60,000 39 25 Base 2013 Queensland n=3855, Mackay 215 Base 2010 Queensland n=3834, Mackay 175 i Source Government Statistician, Queensland Treasury and Trade, Queensland Regional Profile for Mackay Regional Local Government Area. ii Source Government Statistician, Queensland Treasury and Trade, Queensland Regional Profile for Mackay Regional Local Government Area. iii Source Tourism Research Australia s National and International Visitor Survey 2013. $60,000 - $99,000 24 22 $100,000 or more 21 32 Prefer not to say 17 21 te.queensland.com/research 5

Positive impact More interesting things to do Important economic benefits Improved facility maintenance Increased local pride Increased regional profile New infrastructure Greater cultural diversity Benefits of tourism shared evenly Festivals and events attract tourists and raise awareness Description Because of tourism, there are more interesting things to do in my local area (e.g. attractions to visit, events to attend) Tourism is good for the economy because the money that visitors spend when they come to the region helps to stimulate the economy, stimulates employment opportunities, and is good for local business Tourism promotes the development and better maintenance of public facilities such as roads, parks, sporting facilities and/or public transport Tourism increases local residents pride in their town and makes them feel good about themselves and their community Tourism showcases my region in a positive light. This helps to promote a better opinion of my region and encourages future tourism and /or business investment Because of tourism there are better shopping, dining and/or recreational opportunities in the region Tourism brings people from different backgrounds and cultures into the community The benefits of tourism are shared evenly across the local community Festivals and events attract tourists and raise awareness of the region Negative impact Increased opportunity costs More disruption Rise in delinquent behaviour Negative impact on the environment Increased prices Lack of access for locals Description Too much public money is spent on developing facilities for tourists that would be better spent on other public facilities/activities Tourism disrupts the lives of local residents and creates inconvenience. Problems like traffic congestion, parking difficulties and excessive noise are worse when there are lots of tourists around Tourism is associated with some people behaving inappropriately, perhaps in a rowdy and delinquent way, or engaging in excessive drinking or drug use or other criminal behaviour Tourism has a negative impact on the environment through excessive litter and/or pollution and/or damage to natural areas Tourism leads to increases in the prices of some things such as some goods and services and/or property values and/or rental costs Tourists deny local residents access to public facilities, that is, roads, parks, sporting facilities, public transport and/ or other facilities are less available to local residents because of overcrowding Negative impact on local character Because of tourism the character of the region has changed for the worse Increased property values The increase in property values associated with tourism, makes it more difficult for some people to live in the area te.queensland.com/research 6