TO: Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) Members RE: Pangborn Airport Master Plan PAC Meeting #4 Presentation Material DATE: July 18, 2017

Similar documents
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE

STUDY WORK GROUP MEETING No. 4. July 12, 2017

CHAPTER 5: Landside Facility Requirements and Development Concepts

Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016

MASTER PLAN UPDATE. Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) FRESNO YOSEMITE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. Meeting #4

Airport Master Plan. Brookings Regional Airport. Runway Runway 17-35

FORECASTING FUTURE ACTIVITY

TABLE OF CONTENTS. General Study Objectives Public Involvement Issues to Be Resolved

BNA Master Plan Update Community Advisory Committee Meeting No. 5

1.0 Project Background Mission Statement and Goals Objectives of this Sustainable Master Plan

Table of Contents. Master Plan March 2014 TOC i Spokane International Airport

NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO PROPOSED PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE APPLICATION NOVEMBER 9 TH, 2018

CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

STUDY WORK GROUP MEETING No. 3. November 29, 2016

Lake Tahoe Airport Master Plan Public Meeting March 16, 2015

Meeting Summary ABE Master Plan Project Advisory Group (PAG) Meeting #3 August 15, Shannon Eibert, C&S Companies

Airport Master Plan. Rapid City Regional Airport. October 2015 FAA Submittal

Appendix D Project Newsletters. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update

Lake Tahoe Airport Master Plan

Addendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6)

Public Information Meeting. September 2015

Airlake Airport 2035 Long Term Comprehensive Plan (LTCP)

CHAPTER 5 - FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

Table of Contents. List of Tables. Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport 2035 Master Plan Update

Chapter 2 FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS

Gerald R. Ford International Airport Authority Master Plan Update A World Class Gateway

SouthwestFloridaInternational Airport

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport

PLU Airport Master Plan. Master Plan Advisory Committee (MPAC) Meeting #4 March 19, 2018

Appendix F International Terminal Building Main Terminal Departures Level and Boarding Areas A and G Alternatives Analysis

PLU Airport Master Plan. Master Plan Advisory Committee (MPAC) Meeting #2 October 16, 2016

Regular Board Meeting August 4, 2015

INDEPENDENCE STATE AIRPORT (7S5)

Norfolk International Airport

Summary of Committee Discussion/Questions Metropolitan Transportation Services Senior Planner Russ Owen presented this item.

Appendix 6.1: Hazard Worksheet

COUNTY OF MUSKEGON MUSKEGON COUNTY AIRPORT Rates, Charges and Fees for Fiscal Year 2019 October 1, 2018 through September 30, 2019

6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 AIRSIDE ALTERNATIVES NORTH PERRY AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE RUNWAY LENGTH REQUIREMENTS SECTION 6: ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Study Committee Meeting. September 2015

DRAFT FINAL REPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN. Rifle Garfield County Airport Revised May 15, 2014

BNA Master Plan Update Public Meeting No. 2

Westover Metropolitan Airport Master Plan Update

COUNTY OF MUSKEGON MUSKEGON COUNTY AIRPORT Rates, Charges and Fee for FY18 October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018

Master Plan Update Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

DEVELOPMENT OF TOE MIDFIELD TERMINAL IROJECT CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT REPORT DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION TOM FOERSTER CHAIRMAN BARBARA HAFER COMMISSIONER

Technical Advisory Committee Meeting February 29, 2016

Birmingham Airport 2033

Airport Master Plan for Montgomery-Gibbs Executive Airport PAC Meeting #3

Kittitas County Airport Bowers Field Airport Master Plan Planning Advisory Committee Meeting #1 April 6, 2016

CHAPTER 3 AIRPORT FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

Master Plan Update Community Advisory Committee Kick-off Meeting

SAN JOSÉ INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

ACTION TRANSMITTAL

What is an Airport Master Plan?

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW

PLU Airport Master Plan Master Plan Advisory Committee (MPAC) Meeting #4 MASTER PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (MPAC) - MEETING #4

Charles H. Ada II Executive Manager A.B. Won Pat International Airport Guam

Prepared By: Mead & Hunt, Inc Port Lansing Road Lansing, MI 48906

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

Chapter Seven COST ESTIMATES AND FUNDING A. GENERAL

Table of Contents. Overview Objectives Key Issues Process...1-3

Chapter 8.0 Implementation Plan

Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport

8.0 AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS

Alternatives Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SECTION 5 ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT ANALYSES

Source: Chippewa Valley Regional Airport ASOS, Period of Record

Savannah / Hilton Head International Airport Master Plan Update

Airport Master Plan Open House Front Range Airport February 23, 2017

Chapter Six ALP Drawings. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update

The CLE Master Plan Includes:

General Aviation Master Plan Update

Preferred Alternative Summary

3.9 AIRPORT SUPPORT FACILITIES

PREFERRED PLAN Kahului Airport Master Plan and Noise Compatibility Program Update

Current and Forecast Demand

CLASS SPECIFICATION 5/12/11 SENIOR AIRPORT ENGINEER, CODE 7257

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

8 Aviation Support. 8.1 Aerodrome Rescue and Fire Fighting Services. 8.2 Aircraft Refuelling. 8.3 Air Cargo

TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 3 SEPTEMBER 10, Airport Master Plan

Chapter 4 Airport Facility Requirements

Airfield Design OVERVIEW BASIC DESIGN FACTORS. Airport Role

Chapter 4 AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES

Input Efforts Online survey of tenants and users Focus group meetings with Tenants and users Agencies and stakeholders General Aviation Pilot

Airport Master Plan for. Brown Field Municipal Airport PAC Meeting #3

CHAPTER 4: ALTERNATIVES

PULLMAN-MOSCOW REGIONAL AIRPORT Runway Realignment Project

Grants Pass Airport Master Plan & Airport Layout Plan Update

The presentation was approximately 25 minutes The presentation is part of Working Group Meeting 3

Chapter 5 Airport Development Alternatives

AIRPORT IRREGULAR OPERATIONS (IROPS) PLAN. South Bend International Airport (SBN) St. Joseph County Airport Authority

CATCODE ] CATCODE

CHAPTER 3 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

Punta Gorda Airport Master Plan Update

MASTER PLAN UPDATE GRANT NUMBER

Hartford-Brainard Airport Potential Runway Closure White Paper

Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport

Table E-3 Phased Capital Improvement Program...E - 11

Dallas Love Field Update. Dallas City Council Briefing February 18, 2015

Aviation Planning in Maine and Our Region. Stacie Haskell Aviation Coordinator & Study Manager Maine Department of Transportation April 27, 2011

Transcription:

TO: Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) Members RE: Pangborn Airport Master Plan PAC Meeting #4 Presentation Material DATE: July 18, 2017 Please find attached for your review prior to the PAC Meeting #4, the presentation materials to be covered as necessary to formalize the facility alternatives (site location and layout options). The presentation materials focus on the following alternatives: o Taxiway System o Airline Building, Apron, and Auto Parking o Airport Operations Building (AOB) o General Aviation (GA) FBO Building, Hangars, Apron, Crosswind Runway From the last PAC Meeting #3, we have a good sense from you as to finalizing the site location preferences (see exhibit below). For the PAC Meeting #4, we will focus on the site layout options, and would encourage you to come to the upcoming PAC meeting with your site layout preferences. Pangborn Memorial Airport I One Pangborn Drive I East Wenatchee, WA 98802 Phone: 509.884.2494 ext. 6 I Fax: 509.884.0113 I www.flywenatchee.com I www.pangbornairport.com

Below is the agenda for the PAC Meeting #4. As you can see, we begin entering the next aspect of the EAT Master Plan, which is Project Implementation Plan. This involves identifying specific projects, priorities, and funding considerations. As always, if you have any questions or comments, you are welcome to call me at 509-884- 2494 Ext. 6, or provide input using the dedicated EAT Airport Master Plan email at address masterplan@pangbornairport.com. I hope to see you at the upcoming PAC Meeting #4. Sincerely, Trent Moyers Airport Director Pangborn Memorial Airport Attached: PAC Meeting #4 Presentation Materials 7/18/2017

EAT Airport Master Plan PAC Meeting #4 Review Materials July 20, 2017

PARALLEL TAXIWAY SYSTEM

EAST SIDE PARALLEL TAXIWAY CONNECTORS EXISTING AND PLANNED ±1,800 ±1,500 ±2,000 ±1,700 EXISTING PARALLEL TAXIWAY A 540 540 527.5 RUNWAY 12-30 A6 Remain A5 Remain A4 Remove A4 New Former Runway Remove A3 Remain A2 Remove A1 Remain FAA Taxiway Connector Turnoff Guidance

EAST SIDE PARALLEL TAXIWAY SYSTEM EXISTING AND PROPOSED RUNWAY SEPARATION EXISTING PARALLEL TAXIWAY A @ 527.5 TO 540 SEPARATION 400 ILS 527.5 540 PROPOSED PARALLEL TAXIWAY A @ 400 SEPARATION 400 540 400 RUNWAY 12-30 NOTE: TAXIWAY CONNECTORS NOT SHOWN FOR CLUTTER PURPOSES. EXISTING PARALLEL TAXIWAY: 50 to 75 Wide @ 527.5 to 540 Separation From Runway 12-30 Centerline 250 Taxiway Holdshort From Runway Centerline PROPOSED PARALLEL TAXIWAY 75 Wide Parallel Taxiway @ 540 Separation From Runway 12-30 Centerline 250 Taxiway Holdshort From Runway Centerline

PROPOSED WEST-SIDE PARALLEL TAXIWAY (PHASE 3 DARK BLUE) EAST SIDE AIRFIELD Assumes VOR Station Decommission Or Relocation WEST SIDE AIRFIELD

AIRLINE TERMINAL FACILITIES ALTERNATIVES

AIRLINE PASSENGER TERMINAL BUILDING AIRLINE EXPANSION SCENARIOS DERIVED FROM THE AIRLINE FORECAST SCENARIO EVENTS: Scenario 1: Scenario 2: Scenario 3: Scenario 4: Meet EAT 20-year forecast passenger growth (60,000 to 95,000 enplaned growth by 2035) Introduce Second West-Coast Destination/Airline (Two-Gate System with 34-Seat Turboprop) Introduce Second West-Coast Destination/Airline (Two-Gate System with 76 to 90-Seat Jets) Introduce Low-Cost Charter (Two-Gate Gate System with 130 to 150-Seat Jet)

BUILDING LAYOUT SCENARIO 2/3 OPTION 4 AIRLINE APRON VEHICLE CURBSIDE

BUILDING LAYOUT SCENARIO 4 OPTION 5 AIRLINE APRON VEHICLE CURBSIDE

BUILDING LAYOUT SCENARIO 2/4 OPTION 6 AIRLINE APRON VEHICLE CURBSIDE

MATRIX COMPARISON TERMINAL BUILDING SCENARIOS Facility Component / Factors Alternative Options Scenario Passenger Demand Levels Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6 Existing Airport Building 19,000 SF (Single Story: 90' x 260' / 92 Departure Lounge Seats) Airline Forecast Scenario Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 2/3 Scenario 4 Scenario 2/4 Forecast Airline-Passenger Building Scenario (SF) 26,500 SF 29,200 SF 31,900 SF 30,000 SF 33,300 SF 33,300 SF Proposed Building Size (SF) 19,000 SF 20,600 SF 26,800 SF 25,500 SF 31,100 SF 31,050 SF Building Size Per 20,150 SF Fire Wall Code Threshold Less Less Greater Greater Greater Greater Building Exterior Expansion - Number of Sides 1 - W 2 - W / N 2 - W / N 2 - W / N 3 - W / N / S 2 - W / N Requires Remote Building Relocation Yes Yes No No No No Building Features Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6 Number of Airlines / Departure Gates 1 / 1 2 / 2 2 / 2 2 / 2 3 / 2 3 / 2 Expands to 2-Story Building (Yes or No) No No Yes No Yes Yes Passenger Loading (Ground or Bridge) Ground Ground Ground Ground Ground Ground Provides New Building Curbside Entry Point No No Yes No No No Provides Flip-Flow Building Entry No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Requires Fire Sprinklers No No TBD TBD TBD TBD

MATRIX COMPARISON TERMINAL BUILDING SCENARIOS (CONTINUED) Individual Building Components / Factors Bldg. Trigger Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6 Airline Operating Area Expansion (Yes or No) Essential Reconfigure Yes Yes Reconfigure Yes Yes Expands Airline Ticket Counter Essential No No Yes No Relocated Relocated Expands Airline Office Area (Net Area) LOS Yes Yes Yes Reconfigure Relocated Relocated Expands Airline Baggage Make-Up LOS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Expands Airline Passenger Tickekting/Counter Queing LOS No No Yes No Relocated Yes Passenger Departure Lounge Expansion (Yes or No) Essential No Net Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Passenger Departure Lounge (Total SF) Essential 2,150 2,400 2,550 2,050 4,200 2,050 Passenger Departure Lounge (Total Seats) Essential ±90 Seats ±100 Seats 110-124 Seats 120 Seats 160 Seats 120 Seats Bathrooms Upgraded to ADA Compliance Per Code Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Outbound Baggage Improvements LOS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Airline Conveyor to Tug (Yes or No) LOS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes TSA Baggage Screening - By Hand or Equipment Scanner LOS Either Either Either Either Either Either TSA Passenger Screening and Office Area (Yes or No) LOS / Standards No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Expands TSA Passenger Screening Queing LOS No No No No Yes Yes Accommodates TSA SSCP Equipment Upgrades TSA Standards No No No No Yes Yes Meets TSA Checkpoint Guidelines for Space & Layout TSA Standards No No No No Yes Yes

MATRIX COMPARISON TERMINAL BUILDING SCENARIOS (CONTINUED) Individual Building Components / Factors Bldg. Trigger Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6 Airport Administration / Operations LOS ±3,000 SF ±3,000 SF 3,900 SF 4,200 SF 6,150 SF 6,150 SF Accommodates Administrative Staff LOS Exterior Bldg. Exterior Bldg. Marginal Marginal Yes Yes Accommodates Law Enforcement Staff (LEO) LOS Exterior Bldg. Exterior Bldg. Marginal Marginal Yes Yes Expands Airport Storage Area LOS Exterior Bldg. Exterior Bldg. Marginal Marginal Yes Yes Inbound Baggage Improvements LOS No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Baggage Claim - Manual or Conveyor Devise LOS Hand Transfer Conveyor Conveyor Conveyor Conveyor Conveyor Expands Passenger Baggage Claim/ Meeter-Greeter Area LOS No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Expands Tenant Office-Counters / Area (Yes or No) LOS No No No No Yes Yes Expands Restrooms - Non-Secured Area (Yes or No) Per Code No No No Yes Yes Yes Expands Storage Area Yes No No No Yes Yes Constructability & Costs N/A TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Economic Value & Financial Return N/A TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Note: Building reconfiguration triggers compliance with federal ADA requirements (bathroom facilities). Note: 20,150 SF is maximum building area without requiring fire suppression systems; firewall separation possible for expanding adjoinging building areas beyond 20,150 SF. Note: 46,000 SF is allowable building area with sprinkler system. Note: Future timeframe for implementation for TSA passenger or baggage screening equipment upgrades are unspecified.

-ALTERNATIVES - AIRLINE APRON

AIRLINE APRON EXISTING CONDITIONS TERMINAL BUILDING VEHICLES GSE STORAGE TOTAL APRON = 95,500 SF AIRCRAFT MANEUVERING = 87,500 SF AIRCRAFT PARKING = 55,000 SF APRON SUPPORT = 8,000 SF PARKING POSITION #1 (TURBOPROP) C-III TOFA@ 93 PARKING POSITION #2 (TURBOPROP) NON-PARKING AREA TAXIWAY SAFETY AREA 1.50% Wingtip Separation 3.40% ±90 B-II TOFA @ 65.5 GA APRON PARALLEL TAXIWAY A

AIRLINE APRON EXPANSION OPTION ACAP 3 TERMINAL BUILDING VEHICLES NARROW-BODY JET TYPES: EMB-190 MD-90 SERIES B-737 SERIES EMB-190/195 BOMBARDIER CS-300 NARROW BODY JET GSE STORAGE PARKING POSITION #1 NON-PARKING AREA TAXIWAY SAFETY AREA Wingtip Separation B-II TOFA @ 65.5 GA APRON PARALLEL TAXIWAY A

- ALTERNATIVES - AIRLINE AUTO PARKING

FUTURE AIRLINE AUTO PARKING DEMAND (SPACES AND AREA) Lot and Parking Function 2015 (Actual) 2020 2025 2030 2035 2015 to 2035 Change Daily Enplaned Passengers - Peak Month 191 221 253 287 318 127 PARKING SPACES (NO OVERFLOW) 379 340 383 428 470 91 PARKING SPACES (PLUS OVERFLOW) 379 407 458 513 565 186 Short-Term * 45 38 42 47 51 6 Long-Term 235 209 239 271 300 65 Rental Car 69 62 68 74 79 10 Employee/Tenant 30 32 34 37 39 9 Overflow/Special Event 0 66 75 84 95 95 PARKING AREA - SF (NO OVERFLOW) 148,400 170,200 191,500 214,200 234,800 86,400 PARKING AREA - ACRES (NO OVERFLOW) 3.4 3.9 4.4 4.9 5.4 2.0 PARKING AREA - SF (PLUS OVERFLOW) 148,400 201,600 226,900 254,000 279,600 131,200 PARKING AREA - ACRES (PLUS OVERFLOW) 3.4 4.6 5.2 5.8 6.4 3.0 Short-Term * 24,000 25,400 28,600 31,900 34,800 10,800 Long-Term 86,400 98,700 112,900 128,100 142,000 55,600 Rental Car 25,500 30,900 33,800 36,800 39,300 13,800 Employee / Tenant 12,500 15,200 16,200 17,400 18,700 6,200 Overflow / Special Event 0 31,400 35,400 39,800 44,800 44,800 Additional 20- Year Demand - Spaces - Additional 20- Year Demand - Area -

AIRLINE AUTO PARKING OPTION AUTO 1 (RECONFIGURE LOT) New Entry Relocate Rental Expand Short- Term New Livery Lane Expand Employee

AIRLINE AUTO PARKING OPTION AUTO 2 (RECONFIGURE LOT, ENTRANCE, EXPAND LOT) Expand Long-Term Relocate Rental Straighten Entrance / New Access Point Expand Employee

AIRLINE AUTO PARKING OPTION AUTO 3 (RECONFIGURE LOT, NEW ENTRANCE, EXPAND LOT, OVERFLOW) New Overflow New-Expanded Long Term New Circulation Route

AIRLINE AUTO PARKING OPTION AUTO 4 (RECONFIGURE LOT, NEW ENTRANCE, EXPAND LOT, OVERFLOW) New Overflow New-Expanded Long Term / Rental New Circulation Route

COMBINED AIRPORT OPERATIONS BUILDING (AOB) ARFF AND SRE

AOB - EAT RENDERING PROPOSED BUILDING ALLOCATION: ARFF: 5,500 to 7,000 SF SRE: 18,000 to 22,000 SF Storage/Materials: 500 SF Staff Operations: 3,000 to 4,500 SF TOTAL: 27,000 to 34,000 SF Airport Operations Building (AOB): EXISTING BUILDING SPACE: The AOB is a single structure to consolidate Airport Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) and Snow Remove Equipment (SRE) facilities and staff. The ARFF and SRE share many common functions, including staff, emergency response, storage, and vehicle maintenance. ARFF (3 Bays): 4,050 SF SRE (Total Structures): 16,150 SF Storage/Materials: 0 SF Staff Operations: 1,500 SF TOTAL: 21,700 SF

AOB FACTORS EXISTING CONDITIONS AIRPORT WAY SRE SRE SRE SRE AIR CARGO FBO ARFF GA APRON RUNWAY BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE Obsolete Airport Ops. Building Equipment Stored Outside Constrained SRESpace and Door Set Up Airport Staffing of FBO SRE/ARFF Joint Airport and Douglas County Operations Constrained Door Size and Operating Space Proximity of Overnight Quarters

AOB LAYOUT OPTION SITE A AOB-A4 AOB-A5 AOB-A6 AOB-A2-2 AOB-A2-1 AOB-A3 AOB-A1-1 AOB BLDG. FOOTPRINT ±35,000 SF

AOB LAYOUT OPTION SITE D PANGBORN AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK

ALTERNATIVES -GENERAL AVIATION -

FIXED BASE OPERATOR (FBO) BUILDING SITE LAYOUT OPTIONS EAST-SIDE

PANGBORN FLIGHT CENTER - EXISTING SITE FACTORS Future Aircraft Fueling Storage Locations Existing FBO Building Factors: REPLACEMENT FBO BUILDING (±3,500 SF) AIRPORT WAY SRE Building Disposition Adjacent FBO Facilities and Services - Condition - Hangar Size - Door Height - Amenities - Aesthetics Long-Term T-Hangar Disposition and Redevelopment Long-Term Hangar Disposition GA HANGARS T-HANGAR SITE DISPOSITION GA AIRCRAFT PARKING JET-A FUEL SRE FBO 100LL FUEL TAXIWAY A GA APRON ARFF CARGO Optimize GA Apron Frontage ARFF Building Proximity/Future Expansion/AOB Consolidation to Alternate Airfield Site Future GA Aircraft Parking Needs (Aircraft Type)

FBO BUILDING/HANGAR OPTION FBO A-1 AIRPORT WAY FUTURE T-HANGAR DISPOSITION F GA AUTO (FUTURE) TB SRE HR RAMP (F) HR HR HR ARFF CARGO RUNWAY BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE F F

FBO BUILDING/HANGAR OPTION FBO A-3 AIRPORT WAY F AUTO OVERFLOW FUTURE T-HANGAR DISPOSITION HR TB SRE RAMP (FUTURE) F F GA AUTO (FUTURE) FUTURE AOB ARFF CARGO RUNWAY BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE F

FBO BUILDING/HANGAR OPTION FBO A-5 AIRPORT WAY F GA AUTO (FUTURE) FUTURE T-HANGAR DISPOSITION SRE HR RAMP (FUTURE) TB ARFF CARGO RUNWAY BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE F F

GA T-HANGAR DISPOSITION SUB OPTION - GA T-HANGAR REMOVAL SITE OPTION POTENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT SITE ADVANTAGES Large Paved Surface Visibility (Airfield & Landside) Proximity to Paved Apron Existing Utilities Strong Commercial Potential FUTURE T-HANGAR DISPOSITION SITE DISADVANTAGES T-Hangar Removal Timeframe Vehicle Access and Parking Proximity to GA Hangars Proximity to Airline Operations Aircraft Parking (Large GA) Aircraft Parking (Overflow) GA FBO Building GA Tenant Service Providers GA Aircraft Deicing Pad Aircraft Fuel Storage Airport Operations Facilities Potential Air Cargo Site Flexible Development Area Note: Resist Redevelopment for replacement T-Hangars

EAST-SIDE GA SMALL AIRCRAFT HANGARS LAYOUT OPTIONS

GENERAL AVIATION HANGAR TYPES COMMON / CORPORATE (C) Size: 10,000 to 30,000 SF Stored Aircraft: 2 to 4 Aircraft (Corporate-Class Turbine) Use: Aircraft Storage, Workshop, Office Space, Potential Public Use EXECUTIVE (E) Size: 6,000 to 15,000 SF Stored Aircraft: 1 to 3 Aircraft (Piston-Turbine Business-Class/Helicopter) Use: Aircraft Storage, Small Office Space BOX (B) T-HANGAR / SHADE Size: 3,000 to 6,000 SF Stored Aircraft: 1 to 2 Aircraft (Piston-Class) Use: Aircraft Storage, Small Workshop Size: 8,000 to 12,000 SF (Closed Stacked or Nested / Open Shade) Stored Aircraft: 6 to 10 Aircraft (Single/Twin Piston) Use: Aircraft Storage, Workbench Note: This information is intended to reflect a range of common industry hangar sizes and uses.

GENERAL AVIATION HANGAR TYPES Future hangars sites are required for 1) new based aircraft owners, 2) tenant expansion, and 3) replacement for obsolete or removed hangars. Nearly all future based aircraft will be stored in hangars. The following identifies general hangar siting considerations: Ideally, hangars should be developed in a linear, modular manner. Hangar locations should be centralized or grouped by type and function, and aircraft sizes-categories (piston, turboprops, jets, rotor), to promote efficient airfield and landside access, and constructed along existing flightlines as possible, to minimize costs associated with expanded paved areas, drainage, utilities, auto parking and secured access. Hangar orientation should consider weather conditions, and provide adequate drainage with minimal slope differential, especially in front of hangar doors. Hangars must be constructed beyond the runway and taxiway safety areas, navigational critical areas, remain beyond visibility line-of-sights, and be regulated by height so as to not encroach imaginary airspace surfaces. Hangar buildings should be separated to meet, at minimum, FAA taxilane width and safety area distances in providing sufficient access, maneuvering and ramp space.

EAST GA HANGAR OPTION EXISTING (HANGAR IN-FILL AND RETAIN TAXIWAY F ) LARGE EXECUTIVE T-HANGAR / SHADE EEXEC EXEC TAXIWAY F FORMER RUNWAY 7-25 - AIRCRAFT PARKING AREA

EAST GA HANGAR OPTION HGR A (ACQUIRE AIRPORT PROPERTY) ROAD ACCESS- OPTION A (FUTURE) EXISTING HANGARS EXE B EXE B EXE B EXE B EXE B EXE B T-HANGAR / SHADE T-HANGAR / SHADE FUTURE TAXIWAY FORMER RUNWAY 7-25 - AIRCRAFT PARKING AREA Note: Site considered for future removal of the four T-Hangars from the main general aviation apron.

EAST GA HANGAR OPTION HGR B (BEYOND FORMER CROSSWIND) EXISTING HANGARS ROAD ACCESS ROAD (FUTURE) TAXIWAY F TAXIWAY (FUTURE) FORMER RUNWAY 7-25 - FUTURE TAXIWAY B EXE B B EXE B T-HANGAR/SHADE T-HANGAR/SHADE T-HANGAR/SHADE Note: Site considered for future removal of the four T-Hangars from the main general aviation apron.

EAST GA HANGAR OPTION HGR C (SOUTH OF FORMER CROSSWIND) FORMER RUNWAY 7-25 FUTURE TAXIWAY B EXE B EXE B T-HANGAR (R) ROAD OPTION (FUTURE) ASOS STATION T-HANGAR (R) T-HANGAR (R) ROAD OPTION (FUTURE) Note: Site considered for future removal of the four T-Hangars from the main general aviation apron.

EAST GA HANGAR OPTION HGR D (HANGAR IN-FILL, SHADE HANGARS, RETAIN TAXIWAY F ) B B B B B B B B UNSPECIFIED TAXIWAY F (REMAIN OPEN) T-HANGAR/SHADE T-HANGAR/SHADE T-HANGAR/SHADE T-HANGAR/SHADE FORMER RUNWAY - AIRCRAFT PARKING / CONVERT TO FUTURE TAXIWAY

EAST GA HANGAR OPTION HGR D (EXISTING IN-FILL, MAXIMIZE SPACE, CLOSE TAXIWAY F ) B B B B B B T-HANGAR T-HANGAR UNSPECIFIED B B B B B B T-HANGAR B B B B B B EXE EXE TAXIWAY F (CLOSE) TAXILANE TAXILANE TAXILANE TAXILANE TAXILANE FORMER RUNWAY - AIRCRAFT PARKING / CONVERT TO FUTURE TAXIWAY

EAST GA HANGAR OPTION WEST SIDE (CONDITION OF USFS WINTHROP) RESERVE FOR FUTURE LARGE CORPORATE GENERAL AVIATION LOTS TAXIWAY B TAXIWAY B EXTENDED CORPORATE CORPORATE AUTO PARKING AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK

EAST-SIDE GA APRON PARKING LAYOUT OPTIONS

GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT PARKING TYPES Type: Business Jet Parking Area: ±6,000 SF (60 x 100 ) Aircraft Weight: 16,000 to 90,000 Pounds Pilot/Passengers: 5 to 12 Type: Single/Twin-Piston Parking Area: ±2,500 SF (40 x 60 ) Aircraft Weight: 3,000 to 8,000 Pounds Pilot/Passengers: 2 to 5 Type: Single/Twin Turboprop Parking Area: ±4,500 SF (50 x 90 ) Weight: 12,000 to 22,000 Pounds Pilot/Passengers: 3 to 8 Type: Helicopter: Parking Area: ±3,600 SF (60 x 60 ) Aircraft Weight: 2,000 to 15,000 Pounds Pilot/Passengers: 2 to 6 Note: This information is intended to reflect a range of common industry aircraft sizes.

GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT PARKING GA APRON 1 (TWY A RELOCATION ) GA HANGARS POTENTIAL AIRCRAFT PARKING (OVERFLOW) SRE FBO ARFF UPS CARGO CARGO FEDEX CARGO LONG-TERM TIE-DOWN (MIX) GA ROTOR FBO (PISTON) F FUEL FBO (TURBINE) FBO (JET) USFS OVERFLOW

CROSSWIND/TURF RUNWAY ALTERNATIVES

OPTIONS FOR FORMER CROSSWIND AS FUTURE PAVED RUNWAY

MATRIX TABLE PAVED CROSSWIND RUNWAY OPTIONS Facility Component Factor FAA Runway Length (FAA Standards) FAA Runway Design Category FAA Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Facility Factors 3,400' x 60' A/B-I - Small Aircraft Only (Single and Twin-Piston Aircraft) 250' x 1,000 x 450' (Visual Runway) Assessment Option P-A Option P-B Option P-C Option P-D Option P-E Option P-F Length Benefit (% of 3,400' FAA Length) 3,400' 3,400' 2,500' (73%) 2,500' (73%) ±1,800' (52%) ±900' (26%) Length Benefit - Annual Fights (% Total) 2,150 2,150 1,600 (75%) 1,600 (75%) 1,100 (50%) 800 (35%) Occupied Airport Aeronautical Property (Acres) 65 Acres± 65 Acres± 55 Acres± 55 Acres± 48 Acres± 40 Acres± Airfield Configuration, Access and Geometry Rwy 12-30 Taxiway Access/Geometry (Turnaround Needed)* Yes No Rwy 12-30 No Rwy 12-30 New Entry Runway 12-30 and Taxiway 'A' Crossing Yes Yes Yes Yes West End No Airspace Imaginary Surfaces Accommodates RPZ On Airport Property Partial Leased Area Partial Compatibility - Airport Operations / Aircraft Parking Rwy AC Parking Rwy AC Parking Rwy AC Parking Rwy AC Parking West End Partial West End Compatibility - On-Airport Land Use / Visibility Zone Compatibility - Off-Airport (Noise, Overflight) RPZ RPZ Environmental Considerations RPZ RPZ Constructability / Costs Airport Funded Airport Funded Airport Funded Airport Funded Airport Funded Airport Funded Economic Value & Financial Return Cost/Use Cost/Use Cost/Use Cost/Use Cost/Use Benefit/Use

OPTIONS FOR TURF CROSSWIND SITE LOCATIONS AND LAYOUTS

MATRIX EXHIBIT NON-PAVED TURF CROSSWIND RUNWAY OPTIONS Sailplane Hangar and Apron Location Taxiway Considerations Former Glider Landing Strip Does not Comply with FAA Separation and Setback Standards: - Twy Separation (150 ) - Rwy Separation (700 ) - Primary Surface (250 ) - Hold Position (125 ) - Aircraft Parking (125 ) - Runway Safety Area - Runway Object Free Area NON-PAVED TURF RUNWAY REQUIRED TO MEETFAA DESIGN STANDARDS Off Airport Property and Residence Location(s)

MATRIX TABLE NON-PAVED TURF CROSSWIND OPTIONS (LIGHT SPORT AIRCRAFT) Facility Component Factor Runway Length (Former Turf Length) Aircraft Category FAA Runway Design Category FAA Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Facility Factors ±1,000' x 60' (Non-Paved Turf) Light Sport Aircraft (Maximum Gross Takeoff Not Greater Than 1,320 Pounds) / Sailplane Landings A/B-I - Small Aircraft Only (Light and Sport Aircraft) 250' x 1,000 x 450' (Visual Runway) Assessment Option T-A Option T-B Option T-C Option T-D Option T-E Option T-F Turf Strip On Existing Airport Property Yes Yes Partial Partial Partial No Turf RPZ On Existing Airport Property Yes Partial Partial No South End No Airfield Configuration, Access and Geometry Former Runway Aligned with Prevailing Winds Taxiway Access Entry and Geometry Reconfigure Turf Access Turf Access Turf or Paved Turf or Paved Hangar Access? Airspace Geometry-Design Former Runway Parallel Primary Compatibility - Closed Runway 7-25 as 'Paved Runway' Not Co-Existent Requires 700' Conflicts Conflicts 700' Separation 700' Separation Compatibility - Closed Runway 7-25 as 'Aircraft Parking' Not Co-Existent Requires 250'+ Requires 250'+ Conflicts Compatibility - On-Airport Land Use / Visibility Zone ASOS? Relocate ASOS ASOS/Hangars Visibility Visibility Remote Compatibility - Airport Operations Former Runway Compatibility - Off-Airport (Noise, Overflight) Former Runway Home Overflight Overflight(s) Land Purchase Land Purchase Land Purchase Environmental Considerations Former Runway Partial RPZ Land Purchase Land Purchase Land Purchase Land Purchase Constructability / Costs Turf or Paved? Airport Cost Airport Cost Airport Cost Airport Cost Airport Cost Economic Value & Financial Return Functional Use Best Use? Land Revenues

NON-PAVED TURF CROSSWIND RUNWAY OPTION T-B REQUIRES FAA COORDINATION RPZ BEYOND EXISTING AIRPORT PROPERTY NOTE: REQUIRES FAA AIRSPACE FOR FINAL LAYOUT AND LENGTH DETERMINATION