SOUTHWEST AIRLINES. Submitted By: P.Ranjithkumar 10MBA0031. Batch-D

Similar documents
Southwest Airlines: The Freedom to Fly

MIT ICAT. Price Competition in the Top US Domestic Markets: Revenues and Yield Premium. Nikolas Pyrgiotis Dr P. Belobaba

Chapter 16 Revenue Management

Evaluating the Impact of Airline Mergers on Communities

AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT Universidade Lusofona January 2008

Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Transportation Conference. June 16, 2010

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT

Istanbul Technical University Air Transportation Management, M.Sc. Program Aviation Economics and Financial Analysis Module 2 18 November 2013

Airline Network Structures Dr. Peter Belobaba

SpiceJet announces Q2FY15 results: Year-on-year capacity up 7%, revenues up 15%, and expenses down 2% as turnaround efforts gain ground

Southwest Airlines (LUV) Analyst: Rebekah Zsiga Fall Recommendation: BUY Target Price until (12/31/2016): $62

Kuwait Airline Industry Report-Update

2010 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING. May 4, 2010

AIRLINE PASSENGER MARKETING. week 13

NETWORK DEVELOPMENT AND DETERMINATION OF ALLIANCE AND JOINT VENTURE BENEFITS

Client Report. Southwest will fly any plane, as long as it is a Boeing 737

Interim results. 11 May 2010

Vueling Airlines 2009 Fourth-Quarter, Full-Year Financial Results. The 100-milion turnaround story

Analysts and Investors conference call. Q results. 15 May 2013

Southwest Airlines (LUV) Analyst: Tom Martinez and Melvin Kasozi Spring Recommendation: BUY Target Price until 12/31/2016: $65

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON GROWTH AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF JET AIRWAYS, INDIGO AIRLINES & SPICEJET AIRLINES COMPANIES IN INDIA

Antitrust Review of Mergers and Alliances

16.71 J The Airline Industry Fall Team #4: Philip Cho Imbert Fung Payal Patel Michael Plasmeier Andreea Uta December 6, 2010

Route Planning and Profit Evaluation Dr. Peter Belobaba

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No: 77/LM/Oct02. Reasons

2012 Performance. ,ċ ĂĊ. %* * % (ƫ +/%0%+*ƫ,ċƫăă. Our profits (excluding special items) of $417 million grew 26 percent as compared to 2011.

EASYJET INTERIM MANAGEMENT STATEMENT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2010

Second Quarter 2004 Teleconference

International Research Journal of Management Science & Technology ISSN (0nline) (Print) A REFEREED JOURNAL OF

Spirit Overview & 2016 Priorities

Abstract. Introduction

MIT ICAT. Fares and Competition in US Markets: Changes in Fares and Demand Since Peter Belobaba Celian Geslin Nikolaos Pyrgiotis

Finnair Group Interim Report 1 January 30 June 2008

Fundamentals of Airline Markets and Demand Dr. Peter Belobaba

B6006 MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS

PRESS RELEASE Financial Results. Rising passenger traffic at 12.5m Exceeding 1bn in consolidated revenue

J.P. Morgan Aviation, Transportation and Industrials Conference

Would you favour airlines to provide the passenger with more self-service options? (All Pax)

StraitAway Airways. "We make flying special again!" Background Information

Low-cost aiming for long-haul?

PRESS RELEASE. First Half 2017 Financial Results Higher Load Factors and traffic lead to a significant rebound in second quarter profitability

STAYING TRUE. BofAML Global Transportation Conference. May

The US Airline Industry & Herbert Stein s Law

WHEN IS THE RIGHT TIME TO FLY? THE CASE OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN LOW- COST AIRLINES

NORWEGIAN AIR SHUTTLE ASA QUARTERLY REPORT SECOND QUARTER 2006 [This document is a translation from the original Norwegian version]

CITY OF HOUSTON INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: The passenger traffic for each of the airlines for the previous 5 years.

MOKULELE FLIGHT SERVICE, INC. MOKULELE AIRLINES DOCKET OST

Record Result. 2006/07 Full Year Results Investor Presentation. Moved on successfully following bid. Profit before tax % to $1,032 million

2/12/2015. Live Project Report on. Under The Mentorship of: Rahul Agarwal, Chief Pilot. Submitted By: Vijay Satappa Magdum.

Air Connectivity and Competition

THE FUNDAMENTALS OF ROUTE DEVELOPMENT MARKETING TO AIRLINES AND THE PERFECT PRESENTATION MODULE 10

ANA s Growth Strategy

Analysis of the current situation

Outlook for Air Travel

Future European Operations

MIT ICAT M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n

Corporate Presentation National Bank Transportation and Logistics Conference March 24, 2010

Southwest Airlines. Kaushal Desai Vaishali Patel Debra Quach

Thank you for participating in the financial results for fiscal 2014.

Introduction to Transportation Systems

Sabre Summer Defining times. Defining company.

Good afternoon Chairman Cantwell, Ranking Member Ayotte, and members of the

Air Transport Industry

A Conversation with... Brett Godfrey, CEO, Virgin Blue

Multi-Aero Inc. d/b/a Air Choice One

Air Carrier E-surance (ACE) Design of Insurance for Airline EC-261 Claims

Southwest Airlines Co.: LUV

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Cowen 11 th Annual Global Transportation Conference

SUNWAY UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL

The wide spread of financial performance

ACI Annual Assembly Conference & Exhibition

WEB APPENDIX D CAPACITY PLANNING AND PRICING AGAINST A LOW-COST COMPETITOR: A CASE STUDY OF PIEDMONT AIRLINES AND PEOPLE EXPRESS

= 21,60,000. = Solution to Q. 2 Working Notes:

Rajat chaudhary Riya jain Mayank jindal Sadaf asrar

THE FUNDAMENTALS OF ROUTE DEVELOPMENT UNDERSTANDING AIRLINES MODULE 3

Citi Industrials Conference

Case Study: easyjet & Ryanair

Cathay Pacific Airways Limited (293) - Financial and Strategic SWOT Analysis Review

FOR LEASE OR BUILD-TO-SUIT

Management Presentation. March 2016

Airline Schedule Development Overview Dr. Peter Belobaba

Online, Anywhere, Everywhere: In-Flight Connectivity

Incentives and Competition in the Airline Industry

Royal Aeronautics Society. Vaughn Cordle, CFA

The Market Study of Low-Cost Airlines Operating in Thailand s Domestic Routes

QUT BlueShift Business Case Competition 2018 Business Case

Ryannair Holdings plc. Sample 8

SWISS sees operating profit fall to CHF 212 million; Airbus A340s to be replaced with Boeing B ERs

Evolution of Airline Revenue Management Dr. Peter Belobaba

NOTES ON COST AND COST ESTIMATION by D. Gillen

Managing through disruption

Investor & analyst day. London, 28 September 2011

March 4, Investor Conference

QANTAS RESULTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2000 HIGHLIGHTS. Net profit before tax of AUD$762.8 million, up AUD$100.3 million, 15 percent on last year

Sabre Holdings Summer WILLIAM J. HANNIGAN Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

2017 Marketing and Communications Conference. November 6, 2017

MIRAMAR, Fla., April 29, 2015 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Spirit Airlines, Inc. (Nasdaq:SAVE) today reported first quarter 2015 financial results.

Financial Results 3 rd Quarter MAR/2016 (FY2015)

Gulf Carrier Profitability on U.S. Routes

Transcription:

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES Submitted By: P.Ranjithkumar 10MBA0031 Batch-D

PROBLEM STATEMENT: The chief competitor of South West Airlines, Braniff International airways has introduced a 60 day half price ticket sale on Southwest s major route Dallas Hobby. OBJECTIVE: To discuss and strategize alternatives in response to Braniff s move, while ensuring profitability. FACTS: The domestic airline market is highly price sensitive and journey time is very less when compared with international routes. The competitors like Braniff International and Texas International operated long haul flights in Hub and Spoke model while South West Airlines (SWA) operated short haul flights. The target segment for SWA is business community travelling between Dallas, Houston and San-Antonio. The chief competitor, Braniff often cancelled the flights hence it is considered as un reliable operator and its flights were always over booked. The short haul flights of SWA reduced the turnaround time and offered flexibility to the commuters. The major revenue earner route for SWA is Dallas- Hobby (Houston) route in which Braniff has announced a half price sale for 60 days. The Braniff is an established player with strong balance sheet while SWA is a new entrant. BRIEF ANSWER The SWA is a new entrant in the domestic airline market while Braniff and Texas International (TI) are established players. The target market for SWA is business commuters who preferred low cost traveler for short distance travel. The market is also highly price sensitive and they preferred short haul flights over the long haul flights operated by Braniff and TI as the short

haul flights offered flexibility and ambience. The SWA introduced half price fares on all Dallas- San Antonio route which increased the average passenger per flight from 17 to 48 drastically. Braniff has announced half price fares in Dallas-Houston route which is the major revenue earning route for SWA. The SWA has to counter the Braniff s move in order to retain traffic while maintaining the profitability. ANALYSIS: Incremental Cost per Flight = $ 245 Incremental Cost per Passenger = $ 2.8 Operating Expense = $ 1842000 Interest costs = $ 204000 Total Costs = $ 2046000 Total Cost/Flight = $ 717.0146 (Excluding Passenger Variable Cost) Breakeven Analysis: Price Level 30 26 20 13 10 Variable Cost per tax 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 Margin 27.2 23.2 17.2 10.2 7.2 No of Passenger to cover a flight 10.00 11.00 15.00 25.00 35.00 No of Passenger to cover total costs 27.00 31.00 42.00 71.00 100.00 Current affordable price level = $ 36 Off Peak customers = 23 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS:

Parameters Cost (in $ ) Incremental Cost per Flight 245 Incremental Cost per Passenger 2.48 No of Passenger 20 Price 26 Profit 225.4 Revenue 520 From the above sensitivity analysis it is clear that fare can be reduced to $ 16 to counter Branniff s price cut while maintaining the profitability of operations. In the above tabular column Yes refers to the parameters considered by the business traveler (self booking & agent booking) and pleasure traveler while booking the tickets. No refers to the parameters which are not considered while booking the tickets by the commuters. The business commuters and corporate people should be the main target segment for SWA than attracting the commuters of competitor airlines. The price cut has the potential to attract the commuters who use non airline mode of transport. This is necessary to remain profitable in the long run. The competitor s weakness is unreliability due to cancellation of flights and being not punctual. They can t offer the ambience as they operate long haul flights. SWA should concentrate on these parameters and use this as their differentiation, fare being the same for both. The SWA s point to point operation model, short haul flights, less turnaround time, fresh looking crews, good customer service etc are the vintage points and they should capitalize on it by emphasizing it in the advertisements. SWA can fix the high fares for its peak time service which targets the business commuters; they give importance to speed, convenience and punctuality than price.

They can also offer reduced fares during off peak time and concentrate on pleasure traveler who gives importance to price than speed, convenience and punctuality of flight arrival and departure. CONCLUSION: Thus the given case Southwest Airlines was successfully analyzed about its issues and the alternatives which we suggested also given.