Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) st Quarter

Similar documents
Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) nd Quarter

Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) nd Quarter

Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) rd Quarter

Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) rd Quarter

Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) th Quarter

Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) th Quarter

Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) 2014 Year End

Measures & Projections October 31, GoToBermuda.com

Coast to coast. STR Coastal Town Review Coastal Towns Market Review Report_JE.indd 3

TOURISM PERFORMANCE 2017

Loudoun County Lodging Study

IATA ECONOMICS BRIEFING AIRLINE BUSINESS CONFIDENCE INDEX OCTOBER 2010 SURVEY

TOURISM PERFORMANCE 2017

Tourism Snapshot A Monthly Monitor of the Performance of Canada s Tourism Industry

Sound Transit Operations March 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Evaluating Lodging Opportunities

January 2018 Air Traffic Activity Summary

1. Hotel Trends Occupancy Rate

Visit Loudoun 2016 Lodging Market Research

EFFECTS OF CITYWIDE CONVENTIONS ON DOWNTOWN VANCOUVER HOTELS IN 2016

Asheville Metro Economic Report 2014 Second Quarter

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Growth in hotel activity supported by the external market

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Easter boosts results in tourism accommodation

Significant increase in accommodation activity but slightly less than in the previous month

Louisiana Travel Pulse September 2007

Easter boosts results in tourism accommodation

Main indicators kept growing

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

BUSINESS BAROMETER December 2018

Residents ensure increase on overnight stays in hotels and similar establishments

2004 SOUTH DAKOTA MOTEL AND CAMPGROUND OCCUPANCY REPORT and INTERNATIONAL VISITOR SURVEY

Tourism Snapshot A Monthly Monitor of the Performance of Canada s Tourism Industry

Compustat. Data Navigator. White Paper: Lodging Industry-Specific Data

2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report

DTTAS Quarterly Aviation Statistics Snapshot Quarter Report

AUGUST 2008 MONTHLY PASSENGER AND CARGO STATISTICS

1. Hotel Trends Occupancy Rate

Tourism Snapshot A Monthly Monitor of the Performance of Canada s Tourism Industry

49 May-17. Jun-17. Travel is expected to grow over the coming 6 months; at a slower rate

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

AUCKLAND DESTINATION OVERVIEW

Steep increases in overnight stays and revenue

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER 2017

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. October 2017

AUCKLAND DESTINATION OVERVIEW

Sound Transit Operations June 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations January 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Panama City Beach CVB Travel Market Preliminary Report. Prepared for: Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau

Kent Visitor Economy Barometer 2016

MARKET INSIGHTS UPDATE North America

Passenger Traffic Achieves Strong Growth of 4.8% for the Month of August

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. January 2018

Note: These Louisiana indicators show the percentage difference from Second Quarter 2004 to Second Quarter 2005.

Billings Area COC. For the Month of December 2010 Date Created: Jan 18, 2011

DTTAS Quarterly Aviation Statistics Snapshot Quarter Report

PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

Visit Wales Research Update

Tourism Snapshot. A focus on the markets in which the CTC and its partners are active. February 2015 Volume 11, Issue 2.

Preliminary results for 2017 point to increases of 8.9% in guests and 7.4% in overnight stays

The Hotel Industry: The United States, Virginia And Hampton Roads

Tourism Performance Summary Q

Sound Transit Operations January 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode

U.S. DOMESTIC INDUSTRY OVERVIEW FOR MAY 2009

DTTAS Quarterly Aviation Statistics Snapshot Quarter Report

GoToBermuda.com. Q4 Arrivals and Statistics at December 31 st 2015

Kent Business Barometer December 2018

Tourism Snapshot. June 2015 Volume 11, Issue 6. A focus on the markets in which Destination Canada (DC) and its partners are active.

Housing in Hobart: an overview of the data. Richard Eccleston, Lisa Denny, Julia Verdouw & Kathleen Flanagan University of Tasmania May 2018

Oct-17 Nov-17. Sep-17. Travel is expected to grow over the coming 6 months; at a slightly faster rate

visitor insights 2016

U.S. DOMESTIC INDUSTRY OVERVIEW FOR MARCH

Tourism Snapshot A Monthly Monitor of the Performance of Canada s Tourism Industry

September 2013 Passenger and Cargo Traffic Statistics Reno-Tahoe International Airport

Construction Industry Focus Survey. Sample

TOURISM PERFORMANCE 2017

Tourism Snapshot A Monthly Monitor of the Performance of Canada s Tourism Industry

Oct-17 Nov-17. Travel is expected to grow over the coming 6 months; at a slower rate

Non residents boost hotel activity

Hertfordshire Business Barometer April 2018

Performance of Tourism Accommodation January September 2018p

Sound Transit Operations August 2015 Service Performance Report. Ridership

HOTEL INDUSTRY OVERVIEW. Texas

CCC Announces 2009 Casino Revenue

DISTRICT EXPRESS LANES ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017 JULY 1, 2016 JUNE 30, FloridaExpressLanes.com

Hotel Association of North Texas. Karrie Keen Director, Destination and Trend Operations

Hawai i Hotels Statewide Set New Annual Records in 2017 for Revenue Per Available Room and Average Daily Rate

Jan-18. Dec-17. Travel is expected to grow over the coming 6 months; at a slower rate

Tourism Snapshot A Monthly Monitor of the Performance of Canada s Tourism Industry

AUCKLAND DESTINATION OVERVIEW

Panama City Beach Travel Market Economic Impact Report. Prepared for: Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau

Loudon County, TN. Hotel, Restaurant, and Travel Industries: Economic Profile and Business Trends, Loudon County (Loudon and Lenoir City areas)

The Travel and Tourism Industry in Vermont. A Benchmark Study of the Economic Impact of Visitor Expenditures on the Vermont Economy 2005

December 2011 Passenger and Cargo Traffic Statistics Reno-Tahoe International Airport

Maury County, TN. Hotel, Restaurant, and Travel Industries: Economic Profile and Business Trends, Maury County (Columbia and Spring Hill area)

Significant increases in overnight stays and revenue

METROPOLITAN BOSTON DECEMBER Boston Area Roundup

Transcription:

Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) 2018 1st Quarter Prepared by Brian J. Tyrrell, Ph.D. and Rummy Pandit, L.P.D., M.B.A., C.H.A. Executive Director

Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) 2018 1st Quarter Prepared by Brian J. Tyrrell, Ph.D. Professor, Hospitality and Tourism Management Studies Table of Contents Acknowledgements...ii Table of Figures...iii Introduction...1 Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee...3 Atlantic County Lodging Fee...5 Non-Casino Lodging Performance in Atlantic County: Occupancy, Average Daily Rate (ADR) and Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR)...8 2018 1st Quarter Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC- TPI) Snapshot...10 Acknowledgements and Rummy Pandit, L.P.D., M.B.A., C.H.A Executive Director, Lloyd D. Levenson Institute of Gaming, Hospitality and Tourism The Lloyd D. Levenson Institute of Gaming, Hospitality & Tourism (LIGHT) and the authors of the Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI), Dr. Brian Tyrrell and Dr. Rummy Pandit, would like to thank the many individuals and organizations in the Atlantic City region and throughout New Jersey for their contributions to this report. In particular, the New Jersey Casino Control Commission was invaluable in providing the bulk of the data for this report. The Casino Reinvestment Development Authority and the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement were instrumental in helping with revisions to the AC-TPI. STR, Incorporated provides the supply figures used to adjust the Atlantic County Lodging Fee, as well as supplying non-casino Occupancy, Average Daily Rate and Revenue per Available Room data. The LIGHT advisory board members contributions were instrumental to the completion of this report and their ongoing support is much appreciated. Their review, feedback and encouragement are evident throughout this report and it quite simply could not have been completed without their support. Finally, we d like to thank Sarah Grady, Assistant Director for LIGHT, for her careful review of the report. Thanks to all who contributed in the past and those that will likely add to that contribution in the future. We are indebted to you for your insight and assistance. ii

Table of Figures Figure 1: Casino Compared to Non-Casino Lodging Rooms for the Atlantic City Region, Before and After the 2014 and 2016 Casino Closures...page 2 Figure 2: Atlantic City Casino Parking Supply, January 2009 through March 2018...page 3 Figure 3: Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee per 100 Parking Spaces January 2009 to March 2018...page 3 Figure 4: Year over Year (YoY) Change in the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee per 100 Parking Spaces, April 2017 to March 2018...page 4 Figure 5: 12 Month Trailing Total for the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee per 100 Parking Spaces, January 2009 to March 2018...page 4 Figure 6: Atlantic County Monthly Lodging Room Supply, January 2009 through March 2018...page 6 Figure 7: Atlantic County Lodging Fee per 100 Rooms, January 2009 to March 2018...page 6 Figure 8: Year over Year (YoY) Change in the Atlantic County Lodging Fee per 100 Rooms, April 2017 to March 2018...page 6 Figure 9: 12 Month Trailing Total for the Atlantic County Lodging Fee per 100 Rooms, January 2009 to March 2018...page 7 Figure 10: Year over Year (YoY) Change in Atlantic County Occupancy, April 2017 to March 2018...page 8 Figure 11: Year over Year (YoY) Change in Atlantic County Average Daily Rate (ADR), April 2017 to March 2018...page 8 Figure 12: Year over Year (YoY) Change in Atlantic County Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR), April 2017 to March 2018...page 8 Figure 13: 2018 1st Quarter Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) Snapshot...page 10 stockton.edu Stockton University is an AA/EO institution. iii

1 Introduction For several years, the Lloyd D. Levenson Institute of Gaming, Hospitality and Tourism (LIGHT) has been producing the Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) as a quarterly report describing nongaming revenue for the Atlantic City region. The impetus for the report was the changing dynamics with respect to gaming supply in the U.S. northeast, particularly following the introduction of Pennsylvania gaming in 2006. The increased competition for the gaming dollar resulted in significant gaming dollar losses for the Atlantic City region. However, there continued to be growth in non-gaming revenue for the Atlantic City region, growth that was not garnering attention in light of the regional declines in gaming. The dynamics changed again in 2014, this time internal to the resort, as four casinos (Atlantic Club, Showboat, Revel and Trump Plaza) ceased operation during the calendar year. The AC-TPI analyzed changes in three taxes whose combined revenues were driven either exclusively (the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee) or significantly (Atlantic County Lodging Fee and the Atlantic City Luxury Tax) by revenue generated at casino properties in Atlantic City. Since there were significantly fewer parking spaces and hotel rooms at casino properties, these fees undoubtedly would be lower. Yet much of the business from these four closures remained captured by the Atlantic City casino market. Per property performance for the remaining casinos in the Atlantic City market increased. This restructuring of the local marketplace dynamics required a change in the manner in which the AC-TPI captures performance of non-gaming for the Atlantic City region. Originally, the AC-TPI settled on the three taxes for two main reasons. First, the taxes were publicly available and therefore easily verified. Second, because of some unique characteristics of the marketplace, certain measures that are commonly used to measure hotel performance were not available for the Atlantic City region. Specifically, many destinations describe the dynamics of their local hospitality industry using lodging Occupancy, Average Daily Rate (ADR) and Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR). STR, Incorporated solicits owners of lodging properties to supply operating performance on either a monthly or a daily basis, and the provider in turn receives, for a fee, feedback on their performance relative to their local competitive set. Destinations can purchase the

data to describe their total performance over time, and many regularly do. Unfortunately, for the Atlantic City region, the casino hotels do not participate in this program. STR Incorporated s Trend Report for the region thus do not capture the most significant driver of revenue for the Atlantic City region, namely the casinos. Still, the Trend Report does capture a significant portion of the non-casino lodging in the Atlantic City region. Since the closure of the four casino properties in 2014, that portion of the local lodging industry has grown significantly. Figure 1 shows that the month prior to the first of the four closures, December 2013, non-casino lodging accounted for 24% of the Atlantic City region (Atlantic County N.J.). One year later, after all four closures, the December 2014 non-casino lodging accounted for 29% of lodging in the Atlantic City region. More recently, the Taj Mahal and its 2,010 rooms closed increasing the percentage of non-casino lodging to 33% of the lodging market for the Atlantic City region. 80% 60% 76% 67% Thus, there is a growing need for performance measures for the Atlantic City region that separate out the performance of the non-casino lodging industry and report the Occupancy, ADR and RevPAR that STR Incorporated provides. While it will certainly not suffice alone to describe lodging performance, it can supplement our use of the Atlantic County Lodging Fee which does capture the performance of the casino properties in Atlantic City. Indeed, in choosing to begin including the Occupancy, ADR and RevPAR of non-casino lodging in the Atlantic City region, we provide a balance to the AC-TPI which has always reported the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee, a casino-only fee. We additionally removed the Atlantic City Luxury Fee from the AC-TPI, a measure that we had previously included as it captures some entertainment and beverage revenue, but for which there is significant overlap with the Atlantic County Lodging Fee. That the Luxury Fee was primarily generated from the sale of lodging meant the two fees tracked very similarly and thus represented duplication. Further, to account for the changing supply of casino parking spaces and casino lodging rooms, the two fees that we previously included in the report, the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee and the Atlantic County Lodging Fee, will be reported as the figures per available supply. Such reporting will assist in signaling changing dynamics moving forward, while still providing comparable base-line performance given the significant changes over time to the supply of both. 40% 20% 0% Casino Lodging December 2013 24% Non-Casino Lodging December 2013 Casino Lodging December 2016 33% Non-Casino Lodging December 2016 The current version of the Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) now provides a much clearer picture of the performance of nongaming revenues on a per property basis for the Atlantic City region. The enhanced measures provide insight into not only non-gaming tourism performance measures, but can now also distinguish between casino-only measures (Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee) and non-casino measures (STR, Incorporated figures for Occupancy, ADR and RevPAR). Meanwhile, we retain a measure of the entire Atlantic City region s tourism performance by retaining the Atlantic County Lodging Fee. The current report details performance of all these measures through March 2018. 2

Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee The Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee data is provided by the NJ Casino Control Commission (NJCCC). This figure serves as a surrogate for transportation, assuming that if the number of vehicles taxed has gone up or down, then so too will other expenditures on transportation to and from, as well as within, the resort. The tax is described by the NJCCC as: By law, casinos remit a fee of $3.00 per day for each parking space used by patrons in their facility. $0.50 of the parking fee is deposited into the Casino Revenue Fund, with the remaining $2.50 forwarded to the Casino Reinvestment Development Authority for the benefit of Atlantic City. The commission determines and certifies the amounts payable by each casino under the law. The amount collected under the fee, charged to patrons of the casino hotel parking garages, is necessarily influenced by the number of available parking spaces. Over the past 10 years there have been some significant changes to the supply of casino hotel parking spaces. Figure 2 shows that the monthly supply, calculated as the number of available parking spaces times the number of days in the month. The largest gain during that time frame occurred following the opening of Revel, adding 7.6 thousand daily parking spaces, a monthly increase of 237 thousand spaces (15%) for March 2012 compared to March 2011. In mid-january 2014, the Atlantic Club closed, reducing the supply by 862 daily parking spaces and the monthly total to 1.4 million for February 2014, down 17% from February 2013. Three more casinos closed in September of 2014; the Showboat and Revel, both at the beginning of the month, followed by Trump Plaza in mid-september. The impact of these three closures further reduced the daily parking spaces available at casino hotels in Atlantic City by 2.6 thousand, 3.4 thousand and 7.6 thousand respectively. An additional 6.3 thousand spaces were closed in October of 2016 with the closure of the Taj Mahal. The most recent monthly supply figures for casino parking spaces in Atlantic City indicate there were 0.9 million available parking spaces in March 2018. These significant shifts in the number of parking spaces presents a challenge when analyzing the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee over time. Particularly with the most recent closures, simply examining the total fee provides little insight about per property performance relative to driving Millions 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 Mar-09 1.3 Mar-10 1.3 Mar-11 1.3 Mar-12 1.6 Mar-13 1.6 Mar-14 1.5 Feb-14 1.4 Oct-14 1.1 Mar-15 1.1 Mar-16 1.1 Nov-16 0.9 Mar-17 0.9 0.9 $300 $200 $100 Jul-09 $242 Dec-09 $161 Jul-10 $241 Dec-10 $142 Jul-11 $234 Dec-11 $162 Jul-12 $200 Nov-12 $104 Aug-13 $194 Jan-14 $115 Jul-14 $174 Dec-14 $139 Aug-15 $199 Dec-15 $137 Jul-16 $193 Mar-17 $173 Jan-17 $157 Jul-17 $221 $172 Jan-18 $145 0.0 $0 Parking Supply Series1 3

visitation to the remaining casinos. In order to account for this, we present, in Figure 3 (previous page), the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee on a per supply basis (per 100 parking spaces) utilizing the figures displayed in Figure 2 (also previous page). Figure 3 is labeled with the annual high (labeled above the data series) and the annual low (below the data series) for each of the past ten years. Highs occur in July or August, with the best recorded month occurring in July 2006 ($285). July 2017 ($221) is the current 12 month best. Typically, the slowest month is recorded in December or January, the exception being November 2012 ($104), being the result of Hurricane Sandy. The most current data show that March 2018 ($172) was down slightly from March 2017 ($173). Figure 4 shows the year over year change in the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee per 100 parking spaces for the prior 12 months. Collections at the casino parking garages showed considerably more revenue on a per space basis for the first six months of the period, but relatively flat for the more recent six, January (-7%) and February (-4%) being both the exception but also slower months. The closure of the Taj Mahal generated more traffic at the remaining casino properties. All nine months from January 2017 (21%) through September (20%) were up double digits. Given the seasonal nature of the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee (see Figure 3), it is perhaps easier to visualize the long term trend by examining the 12 month trailing total for the fee. For each month, a running total of annual performance is presented. Thus, for 201, the $1 represents the casino parking fee per 100 spaces average for the twelve months from 2017 through 201. Figure 5 shows the 12 month trailing total for the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee per 100 parking spaces. The 12 months ending in December 2007 produced the highest March Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee per 100 parking spaces at $241 (not shown). The per available space fee accelerated its decline after the opening of Revel in March 2012. Following the closures in 2014, this figure rose for several months through mid-2015 when it temporarily peaked for March at $161. The figure then fell for a bit before rising to a new peak of $179 in March 2018. How much of the Taj Mahal business remains with the other casino properties in the resort is not a straightforward question to answer, but the per space performance by the Parking Fee collections would suggest that a good deal of this business has remained in the resort. 30% 20% 10% Apr-17 24% May-17 13% Jun-17 19% Jul-17 14% Aug-17 11% Sep-17 20% $300 $200 Mar-09 $213 Mar-10 $198 Mar-11 $188 Mar-12 $180 Mar-13 $153 Mar-14 $150 Mar-15 $155 Mar-16 $161 $162 Mar-17 $167 $179 $100 0% -10% Oct-17 Nov-17 0% Dec-17 Feb-18-4% Jan-18-7% Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 $0 YoY Change in Parking Fee per 100 Spaces 12 Month Parking Fee per 100 Spaces 4

5 Atlantic County Lodging Fee The Atlantic County Lodging Fee, the Atlantic County portion of the State Occupancy Fee, is utilized in this report to get a clearer picture of lodging performance for the region. While this figure is not Atlantic City specific, there is general consensus that the Atlantic City tourism market impacts the hotel industry throughout the county and thus is a reliable measure of the Atlantic City tourism economy. The figure is released by the NJ Division of Taxation and is described as: Legislation enacted in 2003 (P.L. 2003, c. 114) imposed a 7% State Occupancy Fee on the rent for every occupancy of a room in a hotel, motel or similar facility in most New Jersey municipalities, between August 1, 2003 and June 30, 2004. For occupancies on and after July 1, 2004, the Fee was reduced to 5%. A hotel/motel is a building regularly used and kept open for the lodging of guests, including bed and breakfasts, inns, etc. The State Occupancy Fee is imposed on the room rentals that are currently subject to the 7% New Jersey sales tax and is in addition to the sales tax. Special Rate Provisions: Since Newark, Jersey City, Atlantic City, Wildwood, Wildwood Crest, and North Wildwood already impose local taxes or fees on hotel/motel occupancies, the new State Occupancy Fee is imposed at a lower rate in... Atlantic City (1%)... The same challenges that confront the continued reporting of the total revenue generated under the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee also affect the reporting of the Atlantic County Lodging Fee total revenue. Namely, the closure of the four casinos in 2014 greatly reduced the supply of rooms in the Atlantic City region. Figure 6 (next page) shows the Atlantic County monthly lodging room supply from January 2009 through March 2018, figures drawn from the STR Incorporated Trend Report. Notable increases in the supply can be seen in May 2012 with the opening of the Revel. Conversely, notable decreases in the supply occur in February 2014 following the closure of the Atlantic Club (809 rooms), and again in September 2014, after which time the remaining three closures of the Showboat (1,329 rooms), Revel (1,339 rooms) and Trump Plaza (906 rooms) occurred. In October of 2016 the Taj Mahal closed, further reducing Atlantic City s inventory of rooms by 2,010. After the 2014 and 2016 closures, Atlantic County reports an inventory of 19,321 rooms, supplying 599 thousand room nights in the month of March of 2018.

Thousands 1000 800 600 Mar-09 665 Mar-10 761 Mar-11 762 Mar-12 756 Mar-14 816 Mar-15 774 Mar-13 758 Mar-16 655 Mar-17 648 599 $120 $100 $80 $60 Aug-09 $99 Aug-10 $80 Jul-11 $90 Jul-12 $92 Aug-13 $86 Aug-14 $93 Aug-15 $107 Aug-16 $110 Mar-17 $52 Jul-17 $111 $57 400 200 $40 $20 Jan-10 $29 Dec-10 $28 Dec-11 $29 Dec-12 $34 Dec-13 $45 Dec-14 $34 Dec-15 $32 Dec-16 $37 Dec-17 $39 0 $0 Room Supply The supply of rooms displayed in Figure 6 is used to calculate the Atlantic County Lodging Fee on a per 100 room basis in Figure 7. Figure 7 is labeled with the annual high (labeled above the data series) and the annual low (below the data series) for each of the past ten years. Similar to the Atlantic City Parking Fee described earlier in this report, highs occur in July or August. Unlike the parking fee however, the best recorded month occurred only recently in July 2017 at $111. Lows occur generally in December or January. The lowest month recorded was in December 2010 ($28). The low for the past twelve months was recorded in December 2017 ($39), and that figure was up from each of the past two years. Apr-17 15% May-17 10% Jun-17 7% Jul-17 12% Lodging Fee per 100 Rooms 20% 15% 10% 5% Nov-17 5% Feb-18 14% 8% Figure 8 shows the year over year change in the Atlantic County Lodging Fee per 100 rooms for the prior 12 months. Importantly, following the closure of the Taj Mahal in 2016, significant gains were realized for the first seven months of 2017. The declines in October 2017 (- %) are somewhat nullified by the gains in November 17 (5%), however November is notably slower than October, but may also be related to an extra weekend day in October 2016 and that the Taj Mahal didn t close until mid-october. A slower January (-9%) was followed by healthy gains in February (14%) and March (8%). Seven of the past twelve months have seen positive growth. 6 0% -5% -10% -15% Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17-8% YoY Change Lodging Fee per 100 Rooms Dec-17 Jan-18-9%

Given the seasonal nature of the Atlantic County Lodging Fee (see Figure 7), it is again easier to visualize the long term trend by examining the twelve month trailing total for the fee. Figure 9 shows the twelve month trailing total for the Atlantic County Lodging Fee per 100 rooms. On a per room basis, declines have given way to increases. The twelve months ending in March 2018 averaged $688, or 2.8% higher than the twelve months ending in March 2017. This per room performance trended downward a bit over the past few months, likely settling in after twelve months had passed since the closure of the Taj Mahal in September 2016, and yet turning positive again towards the tail end. $800 $600 Mar-09 $544 Mar-10 $470 Mar-11 $516 Mar-12 $548 Mar-13 $577 Mar-14 $546 Mar-15 $609 Mar-16 $633 Mar-17 $669 $688 $400 $200 $0 12 Month Lodging Fee per 100 Rooms 7

Non-Casino Lodging Performance in Atlantic County: Occupancy, Average Daily Rate (ADR) and Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR) Data drawn from the STR Incorporated Trend Report provide valuable insight to the Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI): Occupancy, Average Daily Rate (ADR) and Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR). These three measures have long been a staple of analyzing lodging performance and have been adopted by numerous destination marketers across the globe in analyzing the health of a tourist destination s lodging industry. While these measures are not available for the casino properties in Atlantic City, they do provide valuable information nonetheless for the noncasino lodging properties in the Atlantic City region (Atlantic County). 6% 4% 2% 0% -4% Apr-17 3% May-17 1% Jun-17 2% Jul-17 1% Aug-17 1% Sep-17 3% Oct-17 3% Nov-17 4% Feb-18 2% Figures 10 through 12 provide STR Incorporated figures from the Trend Report, showing Occupancy, ADR and RevPAR for the most recent 12 month year over year performance. The period began somewhat positive for all three performance measures, but that has given way to largely poorer year over year comparisons the last several months in the period. ADR fared -6% -8% Average Daily Rate Dec-17-6% Jan-18-6% 6% 4% 2% Apr-17 4% Jul-17 4% 8% 6% 4% 2% Apr-17 7% Jun-17 1% Jul-17 5% Nov-17 2% 0% 0% -4% May-17-3% Jun-17 Aug-17-3% Sep-17-4% Oct-17-3% Nov-17 Dec-17 Feb-18-3% -4% -6% -8% -10% May-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Dec-17-8% Feb-18-3% -6% Jan-18-5% -12% Jan-18-10% Occupancy Revenue per Available Room 8

best of the three metrics, not turning negative until December 17. ADR was up in March however, a modest 2% increase compared to March of 2017. Occupancy and Revenue Per Available Room (RevPAR) have largely experienced year over year declines since August of 2017, though most have been rather modest as well. Comparing across sections of this report further, solid gains were had in April and July on all three performance indicators. The fall and winter months showed somewhat mixed, but mostly negative year over year comparisons on all three indicators. The addition of Occupancy, Average Daily Rate (ADR) and Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR) provides valuable insight into non-casino lodging performance in the Atlantic City region. Of these three measures, RevPAR may be of the most value in determining longer term trends in the marketplace as RevPAR is a combination of both Occupancy and ADR (Occupancy multiplied by ADR is equal to RevPAR). As such, changes in RevPAR will be the summary variable for the non-casino lodging performance measure included in the AC-TPI Snapshot presented in the final section of this report. 9

2018 1st Quarter Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) Snapshot The Lloyd D. Levenson Institute of Gaming, Hospitality and Tourism (LIGHT) has concluded that non-casino Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR) and the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee and Atlantic County Hotel Fee (both on a per supply basis) can serve as an effective proxy for the performance of the tourism economy in Atlantic City. These measures, or more precisely the year over year change in the monthly figures for these measures, are compiled into an Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators Snapshot at the end of each quarter. We are grateful for the support of STR, Incorporated for supplying the RevPAR figures, the New Jersey Casino Control Commission for providing the Parking Fee, and the New Jersey Treasury for providing the Lodging Fee. The goal of the AC- TPI is to provide key measures with analysis that can describe the results of the resorts current efforts at revitalizing the Atlantic City tourism economy. 20% 15% 14% 10% 8% 7% 5% 3% 0% -5% -10% -15% -7% -9% -10% -4% -3% 0% Jan-18 Feb-18 Prior 12 Months Parking Fee per Space Lodging Fee per Room Atlantic County Non-Casino RevPAR 10