Many thanks to our host

Many thanks to our host

Many thanks to our Lead Sponsor

Opening Addresses Eng. Hussein Massoud Minister of Civil Aviation Egypt

Opening Addresses Paul Riemens CANSO Chairman of the Executive Board & CEO, LVNL

Opening Addresses Mohamed Khonji Regional Director, Middle East Office ICAO

Opening Addresses Massimo Garbini CANSO EC3 Chair & CEO, ENAV S.p.A.

Opening Addresses Mohey Ragheb Chairman NANSC, Egypt

Opening Addresses H.E. Moh d Amin Al Quran CANSO MEC3 Chair & Chief Commissioner / CEO CARC

ICAO Block Upgrade Eugene Hoeven Director ICAO Affairs CANSO

A CANSO Perspective Aviation System Block Upgrades CANSO Middle East Conference Cairo, 26-28 March 2012 Eugene Hoeven MBA Director ICAO Affairs

CANSO Vision CANSO's Global Vision identifies the areas of change needed within the regulatory and operational domains, as well as the issues we must address if we are to achieve a truly global ATM system

ICAO has recognised that: Global framework is needed to ensure: Safety is maintained and enhanced ATM improvement programmes are harmonized Barriers to efficiency and environmental gains are removed Investment certainty is required for: Operators Infrastructure providers Equipment manufacturers Regulatory approval process must be streamlined Support States in introduction of significant changes

The Challenge of Global Harmonization Future ATM technologies must be compatible and interoperable (Standards) Integration of new technologies, systems, procedures and concepts into domestic airspace (mixing new with old) Regional collaboration and coordination is needed (crossboundary and multilateral harmonization) Service Provider and Operator investments required to realize full benefits (infrastructure, avionics, procedures) ICAO, CANSO and others must continue leadership role in promoting cross-regional harmonization (Block Upgrades)

21 The ASBUs has been a Team Effort

What is a Block Upgrade? Measurable Operational Improvement Air & Ground Standards / Procedures Air & Ground Equipment / Systems Operational approval / certification Positive Business Case

A Block is Made Up of Modules

and a Block is Scalable to Meet Regional or Local Needs

Performance Improvement Areas Understanding the Relationships Block 0 (2013) Block 1 (2018) Block 2 (2023) Block 3 (2028 & >) Greener Airports Globally Interoperable Systems and Data Optimum Capacity and Flexible Flights Efficient Flight Path Modules Threads 25

Threads Between Modules and Across Blocks Greener Airports Block 0 Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 Improved Traffic Flow through Runway Metering Improved Approach & Departure Manageme nt through Integration Linked AMAN/ DMAN Integrated AMAN/ DMAN/ SMAN

Threads Between Modules and Across Blocks Global Interoperable Systems & Data Through Global SWIM Block 0 Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 Increased Interoperabil ity, Efficiency & Capacity through Ground- Ground Integration Increased Interoperabi lity, Efficiency & Capacity through FF- ICE/1 application before Departure Improved Coordination through multicentre Ground- Ground integration: (FF-ICE/1 & Flight Object, SWIM) Improved Operational Performance through the introduction of Full FF-ICE

Threads Between Modules and Across Blocks Optimum Capacity & Flexible Flights Through Global Collaborative ATM Block 0 Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 Improved Flow Performance through Planning Based on a Network- Wide View Enhanced Flow Performance through Network Operational Planning Increased User Involvement in the Dynamic Utilisation of the Network Traffic Complexity Management

Threads Between Modules and Across Blocks Efficient Flight Plan Through Trajectory-based Operations Block 0 Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 Improved Flexibility & Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDOs) Improved Flexibility & Efficiency in Descent Profiles (OPDs) Optimised Arrivals in Dense Airspace Full 4D Trajectory based Operations

Global Rollout ASBU concept introduced at GANIS State Letter consultation on ASBUs 16 Feb 2012 Regional outreach High Level Briefings DGCA Meetings plus Symposia 5 day workshops with practical implementation Pre- AN-Conf/12 Workshop AN-Conf/12 Paper distributed 30 June 2012 States consideration in November Working Document posted on website www.icao.int/anconf12/asbu

Harmonized ATM - Towards a truly seamless global system Align firmly with Block concept - Operators & OEMs Synchronized investments in avionics (Roadmaps) Removes need for regulatory mandates Reduces lead time (6 years away) Reduces costs Minimizes Retrofits (very expensive) Integrated Avionics and quicker installation & Certification Synchronized investments by ANSPs / States Block design recognizes regional differences Reduces complexity of competing safety priorities Integrates Needs of domestic & international operations Recognizes Budgets Threads the modules 31

12 th Air Navigation Conference AN-Conf/12, 19-30 November 2012 Acknowledge Block 0 Agree to Block 1 Block 1 will serve as the enabler and foundation for the envisioned future aviation systems Endorse the Strategic Direction to Blocks 2 & 3 Strategies for longer-term requirements Opportunity to formalize future infrastructure & equipage Present revised GANP Operational capabilities to manage ATM system requirements

CANSO comments on Block 1 Budget considerations greater for Block 1 Involves technology insertion in ground and/or air Requires moving to network-based communications Many States require substantial infrastructure investment Regional synchronization issues Equipage and capabilities Essential to successful implementation of future Blocks Global Standards can mitigate such risks Ensure interoperability between regional ANSPs Offers stakeholders common guidelines

The CANSO Position Need for STANDARDS NOT MANDATES Need for Global Interoperability is very clear: Avionics-Ground system: very long lead time Ground-Ground stakeholders: more connectivity desired Diverse regional requirements need greater recognition: Seamless operations require synchronized investment across multiple FIRs Many States have particular needs, priorities, and approaches not always shared by others

The CANSO Position Unification of Global Initiatives Focus of NextGen, SESAR, CARATS, FIANS, CNAS, et. al. Concentrated, focused, modular, complete Harmonization of Timeframes and Capability Globally between regions and larger actors Regionally between neighbors Domestically between States and ATC stakeholders Business Case Justification for internal action Cross-organizational stakeholder buy-in Supports Cost-Benefit Analyses

CANSO AN-Conf/12 Preparation Monthly conference calls of OSC and PSC chairs, ASBU WG Chair, Program Managers, CANSO RDs OSC has committed to drafting the following papers: GANP, ASBUs and roadmaps Data Communications AIS to AIM SWIM evolution path ANSP requirements for UAS Flight efficiency and ATM environmental performance

CANSO AN-Conf/12 Preparation PSC has committed to drafting papers on the following topics: Policy and regulatory impediments (e.g. sovereignty, funding issues, regulatory approvals, etc.) Implementation incentives/issues (i.e. principles such as Best equipped, best served ) Standardization issues

CANSO AN-Conf/12 Timeline 8-9 March proposed topics for working papers agreed during CANSO ATM Operations Conference 12-13 March proposed topics for working papers agreed during 1 st meeting of the PSC mid-april drafting of papers and review of ICAO Secretariat papers when available 23-26 June 1 st drafts ready for review during time of the AGM end-july 2 nd drafts ready for review by Standing Committees end-september final review and approval of papers; papers submitted for translation 30 October submission of papers to ICAO June-November lobby States and stakeholders

CANSO feedback message to ANSPs Cross-reference your ATM plans with the ASBUs Focus on Operational Improvements, less on Technology Start talking to your Regulator NOW! Consult with GA, Military, other stakeholders Look at training requirements: involve controllers early! Work toward Regional Agreements Focus on the business case - metrics and CBAs are key : Investments Minimize mixed equipage Address your Safety Net requirements; for example: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) Airspace re-design

Future Aviation Challenge Team Develop consensus and advocacy to address impediments to interoperability and implementation Brings together senior aviation decision-makers Technical/Operational challenges are considered in the ASBU framework Political/Economic challenges are much more difficult and an impediment to progress Develop One Voice communications to policy-makers, legislators, stakeholders, general public Propose a set of operational and financial principles / policies to accompany the ASBU program To be considered during the AT-Conf/6 in 2013

ICAO Block Upgrade Matt Riley General Manager Air Traffic Services Serco

Aviation System Block Upgrades CANSO ASBU Work Group / A ME Regional ANSP perspective Matthew Riley General Manager ATS Serco Dubai Air Navigation Services Advise Design Integrate Deliver 27 th March 2012

State Letter Feedback What is CANSO s role in ASBUs?

State Letter Feedback Concerns of States, Industry and ANSPs Serco Internal

Stakeholder Feedback Serco Internal

Stakeholder Feedback From CANSO Need a mechanism for State feedback, including the reasons for acceptance/rejection From International Coordinating Council of Discussed at TT #8, no determination Aerospace Industries Associations provided by ICAO but accepted the idea Needs a globally-harmonized, cross-regional Non-required From States vs global interoperability approach Many Business metrics are case just needs notional strengthening, benefits, need across value regions Modules and measurable should Expanded include benefits but Training, needs more Human work Factors, and Procedures SAE Team section is going to continue the work How Included Need ANSP and more can expanded identify clarity in bundles based CNS enablers on of modules comments ANSPs should be providing ICAO good Add dynamic sectorization module examples to tie to Modules and Roadmaps TT already included in other Modules Add a Shared surveillance cross FIR module TT determined not to address at this time. This is a Best Practice Serco Internal

CANSO Feedback Feedback to CANSO helped immensely: A better understanding of ANSP requirements and challenges Feedback to the Tech Team for ASBU revisions CANSO now serves as a global voice ; the transition to a Global Partner needs to take stage now States and ANSPs to socialize ASBUs Global Best-Practices, in the spirit of Partnership for Progress Serco Internal

The CANSO Position NOT A MANDATE Unification of Global Initiatives Focus of CARATS, NextGen, SESAR, FIANS, CNAS, et al Concentrated, focused, modular, complete Harmonization of Timeframes and Capability Globally between regions and larger actors Regionally between neighbours Domestically between States and ATC stakeholders Serco Internal

The CANSO Position Business Case Justification for internal action Cross-organizational stakeholder buy-in Supports Cost-Benefit Analyses STANDARDS NOT MANDATES Need for Global Interoperability very clear: Avionics-Ground system: have a very long lead time Diverse regional requirements are recognised: Seamless operations require synchronized investment across multiple FIRs Many States have particular needs, priorities, and approaches not always shared by others Serco Internal

Moving forward If you wait for clearly defined ASBU Module and Roadmap descriptions for exactly what ICAO desires for implementation and harmonization If you want all the data and plans to make your job easy you will never get anywhere! Serco Internal

Challenges to Regional Harmonization It is critical that future ATM technologies be compatible and interoperable (Standards) Integration of new technologies, systems, procedures and concepts into domestic airspace (mixing new with old) Regional collaboration to coordinate modernization technologies and time lines (cross boundary and multilateral harmonization) Service Provider and Operator investment required to realize full benefits (infrastructure, avionics, procedures) ICAO, CANSO and others must continue leadership role in promoting crossregional harmonization (ICAO Block Upgrades) Serco Internal

State Letter Feedback What does this mean to an ANSP? Serco Internal

Block 1 in Perspective B1-105 - Better Operational Decisions through Integrated Weather Information B1-30 - Service Improvement through Integration of Digital ATM Information B1-31 - Performance Improvement through the application of System Wide Information Management (SWIM) B1-35 - Enhanced Flow Performance through Network Operational Planning B1-15 - Improved Apt Ops through Departure, Surface, and Arrival Management ToC B1-40 - Improved Traffic Synchronisation and Initial Trajectory-Based Operation B1-85 - Increased Capacity & Flexibility through Interval Management ToD B1-10 - Improved Operations through Free Routing B1-90 - Initial Integration of Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) Systems into nonsegregated airspace B1-05 - Improved Flexibility & Efficiency in Descent Profiles (OPDs) CTA B1-65 - Optimised Airport Accessibility B1-75 - Enhanced Safety & Efficiency of Surface Operations (ATSA-SURF) & EVS B1-80 - Optimised Airport Operations through A-CDM B1-25 - Increased Interoperability, Efficiency & Capacity though FF- ICE/1 application before Departure B1-70 - Wake Vortex Separation - Refined B1-81 - Remotely Operated Aerodrome Control Tower Serco Internal

State Letter Feedback This isn t just about technology Serco Internal

Thoughts for going forward CANSO should clearly state the desired outcomes of the ASBU initiative Serco are working to identify our desired outcomes for the ASBU effort. What do our customers need? What are our customers Goals? Will ASBUs meet them? Provide innovation to ICAO, Regions, etc., when an issue is identified by offering examples, alternatives or in some instances solutions Serco Internal

Key Decisions for CANSO Datacom convergence SWIM Human-in-the-loop challenges (Man-Machine) Other decisions Best-equipped best served Mandates Equipment Incentives Policy Financial/Economics RPA integration How CANSO can support less capable States implement Serco Internal

Requests of you Read the ASBU documentation Feed back to your State Feed back to CANSO Look for political as well as operational solutions for our region Serco Internal

Requests of you Thank you Serco Internal

ICAO Block Upgrade Hazim A. Abudaowd Chair of CANSO MESCC & Director General, Systems Engineering Directorate GACA

ASBU Presentation Formulating ME Regional Position on ASBU

Presentation Outline Introduction ASBU Modules Selection Factors SESAR & NEXGE Requirements/Environment Module Prerequisites ME Regional Position Development Conclusion

Introduction ASBU Objectives: Facilitate Global Interoperability Ensure Global Harmonization ATM Modernization Utilize current airborne equipage Focus on performance improvements Suite of capabilities modules

Presentation Outline Introduction ASBU Modules Selection Factors SESAR & NEXGE Requirements/Environment Module Prerequisites ME Regional Position Development Conclusion

ASBU Modules Selection Factors ICAO Global ATM Operational Concept ICAO Global Air Navigation Plan Block upgrades are based largely on SESAR NextGen Global interoperability Clear operational rationale &measurable value Current knowledge on the feasibility of the modules

Presentation Outline Introduction ASBU Modules Selection Factors SESAR & NEXGE Requirements/Environment Module Prerequisites ME Regional Position Development Conclusion

SESAR & NEXGE Requirements/Environment

SESAR & NEXGEN Requirements/Environment Traffic demand Weather Conditions Airport Operation Infrastructures Capabilities Aircraft Equipage Aircraft Mixed Capacity Limit R&D capability and Industry support Airspace Definition Phase

Presentation Outline Introduction ASBU Modules Selection Factors SESAR & NEXGE Requirements/Environment Module Prerequisites ME Regional Position Development Conclusion

Module Prerequisites Availability of ICAO SARPs Concept definition & Feasibility study Positive Cost/Benefit Analysis Availability National regulatory frameworks Validation & Operational Trails Safety assessment & Safety case

Module Prerequisites Stakeholders coordination and cooperation Availability of new technologies Implementation of the enablers Synchronization of Airborne & Ground systems implementation

What is the status of the Module Prerequisites?

Globally Interoperable. SARPs/Procedures Greener Airport Globally Interoperable Systems and Data B0 Optimum Capacity and Flexible Flights Efficient Flight Path GNSS based approaches Ground Ground Integration(AIDC) Enhanced En Route Trajectories continuous descent operations (CDOs) Wake Vortex Separation AIS/AIM Planning based on a Network Wide view application of Data Link En Route (FANS1/A) (A SMGCS) Air Traffic Situational Awareness (ATSA) continuous climb operations (CCOs) A CDM Runway Metering

Globally Interoperable. B1 Greener Airport Globally Interoperable Systems and Data Optimum Capacity and Flexible Flights Efficient Flight Path Optimized Airport Accessibility FF ICE/1 application Dynamic ATS Routing Improved Descent Profiles Dynamic Wake Vortex Separation Integration of all Digital ATM Information Interval Management Improved Traffic Synchronization and Initial Trajectory Based Operation. (A SMGCS/ATSA SURF) System Wide Information Management (SWIM) Climb/Descent Procedures using ADS B Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) nonsegregated airspace Optimized A CDM prioritization for collaboratively defining ATFM Remote Operated Aerodrome Tower Integrated Weather Information AMAN/DMAN

What is the status of the Module Prerequisites? ME Plan/Definition phase/atm Requirements? ME Cost Benefit Analysis? ME Stockholders Coordination? Synchronization of Airborne & Ground systems implementation in ME? National regulatory frameworks ME Trial Phase/ Safety Case?

Presentation Outline Introduction ASBU Modules Selection Factors SESAR & NEXGE Requirements/Environment Module Prerequisites ME Regional Position Development Conclusion

ME Regional Position development Regional understanding of ASBU Conduct workshop & Seminar on ASBU Develop ME Definition Phase Develop ME regional Requirements/Plan Conduct Business case Stakeholders coordination & cooperation

ME Regional Position development GNSS Augmentation? FANS1/A implementation? Remote Tower Operation(B1)? Module solutions are not required in all airspaces Some Modules are not necessary in many parts of the world Module implementation date is not mandated

ME Regional Position development Use CANSO platform to develop ME Position on ASBU Develop ME ATM requirements /Plan Make the necessary preparation for the 12 th ICAO ANC

Presentation Outline Introduction ASBU Modules Selection Factors SESAR & NEXGE Requirements/Environment ASBU Performance Improvement Areas Bolck 1 Modules Bolck 2 Modules Module Prerequisites ME Regional Position on ASBU Conclusion

Conclusion ME ANSP s need to work together to develop a ME regional position on the ASBU CANSO is a good platform to help the ME region to have a good understanding of ASBU and to have a ME regional position in the ICAO 12 th ANC

86