The Economic Impact of West Oxfordshire s Visitor Economy 2015

Similar documents
The Economic Impact of West Oxfordshire s Visitor Economy 2016

The Economic Impact of Gloucestershire s Visitor Economy Forest of Dean district

The Economic Impact of Gloucestershire s Visitor Economy Forest of Dean district

The Economic Impact of Poole s Visitor Economy 2015

West Somerset 2015 Local data version

Self Catering Holidays in England Economic Impact 2015

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Commissioned by: Economic Impact of Tourism. Stevenage Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Economic Impact of Tourism. Hertfordshire Results. Commissioned by: Visit Herts. Produced by:

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Canterbury Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Dover Results. Produced by: Destination Research

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Oxfordshire Estimates for 2014

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014

Value of Tourism 2007 FORMER AVON

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Economic Impact of Tourism. Norfolk

The Economic Impact of Tourism Eastbourne Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Oxfordshire Estimates for 2013

The Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Economic Impact of Tourism. Cambridgeshire 2010 Results

An overview of the importance and economic contribution of the visitor economy in Dorset

The Economic Impact of Tourism New Forest Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Thanet Results. Produced by: Destination Research

The Economic Impact of Tourism West Oxfordshire Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Impact of Tourism West Oxfordshire Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The tourism value of the natural environment and outdoor activities in

TELFORD & WREKIN TOURISM ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT

SHREWSBURY TOURISM ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT

the research solution

The Economic Impact of Tourism

Tourism activity supports 60,007 full-time equivalent jobs locally

2.1m visits made by Day Visitors to the park area in Total Visitor Numbers increased by 14%

LOCAL AREA TOURISM IMPACT MODEL. Wandsworth borough report

Stoke-on-Trent Tourism Economic Impact

Insight Department: Scotland The key facts on tourism in 2016

Temecula Valley Travel Impacts

Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County September 2016

Insight Department: Scotland The key facts on tourism in 2016

The regional value of tourism in the UK: 2013

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Jacksonville, FL. June 2016

The Travel and Tourism Industry in Vermont. A Benchmark Study of the Economic Impact of Visitor Expenditures on the Vermont Economy 2005

The Economic Impact of the 2015 ASICS Los Angeles Marathon. September 2015

Temecula Valley Travel Impacts p

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County. July 2017

Caravan & Camping Park Sector Annual Report 2011

July 2018 RV PRODUCTION. Overview of towable and motorised recreational vehicles manufactured in Australia. Data Provided by nemaustralasia

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County, June 2018

MONTEREY COUNTY TRAVEL IMPACTS P

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2014 Economic Impact Report

THE 2006 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TRAVEL & TOURISM IN INDIANA

The Value of Activities for Tourism

2009 Muskoka Airport Economic Impact Study

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Walworth County, Wisconsin. July 2013

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Maryland. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2015

BUSINESS BAROMETER December 2018

The Economic Contribution of Cruise Tourism to the Southeast Asia Region in Prepared for: CLIA SE Asia. September 2015

CHL Consulting Company Ltd.

INSIGHT DEPARTMENT. Coastal Tourism in Scotland

The impact of investments & storms on the economic benefits provided by the South West Coast Path National Trail to the region between 2010 and 2014

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas

Changes to Daylight Saving: Implications for Agriculture and Rural Communities Tourism Alliance Submission

TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary. Convention Industry Overview and Trends. Convention Market Competitive and Comparable Analysis

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2016 Economic Impact Report

The Economic Impact of Travel in Minnesota Analysis

Destination Performance 2012

Tourism to the Regions of Wales 2008

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2012 Economic Impact Report

VisitScotland Scottish Accommodation Occupancy Survey October to December Quarterly Report

Travel and Tourism in Denmark to 2017

Investigating International Business Events Delegate Spending Patterns in Malaysia

VisitScotland Scottish Accommodation Occupancy Survey April to June Quarterly Report

Estimates of the Economic Importance of Tourism

Economic Contribution of Tourism to NSW

CRUISE ACTIVITY IN BARCELONA. Impact on the Catalan economy and socioeconomic profile of cruise passengers (2014)

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas Analysis

Trends & Statistics - December 2014

Destination UK focus on the South West. Driving growth in the UK hospitality and leisure sector

Economic Contribution of Tourism to NSW

ROTORUA REGIONAL AIRPORT

Hertfordshire Business Barometer September 2018

Economic Impact Assessment of the Cruise Shipping Industry in Australia, Cruise Down Under. Final Report September, 2010

Tourism Trends. Humphrey Walwyn Head of VisitEngland Research October 2018

Australian Casino Association ECONOMIC REPORT. Prepared for. Australian Casino Association. June Finance and Economics

Domestic Tourism to South West Wales in 2006, 2007 and 2008 Factsheet

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Maryland. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2016

Economic Impact Analysis. Tourism on Tasmania s King Island

South West Coast Path Monitoring & Evaluation Framework. Year 1 Key Findings Summary. Produced for and on behalf of the South West Coast Path team

Economic Impacts of Campgrounds in New York State

Hertfordshire Business Barometer July 2018

Contents Manningham at a Glance... 6 Location and Area... 6 Manningham Activity Centres... 6 Manningham Suburbs... 6 Population... 8 Forecast... 9 For

HEALTH SECTOR ECONOMIC INDICATORS REPORT

The Economic Impacts of the Open Skies Initiative: Past and Future

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Buncombe County, North Carolina

Transcription:

The Economic Impact of West Oxfordshire s Visitor Economy 2015 Produced on behalf of the West Oxfordshire District Council By The South West Research Company Ltd October 201 1

Contents Page Introduction 3 West Oxfordshire district data 4 2

Introduction This report examines the volume and value of tourism and the impact of visitor expenditure on the local economy in West Oxfordshire district in 2015. West Oxfordshire works very closely with other districts in Gloucestershire as part of the Cotswold brand so comparisons to Gloucestershire districts are also provided. The figures were derived using the Cambridge Economic Impact Model undertaken by The South West Research Company (TSWRC). The model utilises information from national tourism surveys and regionally/locally based data. It distributes regional activity as measured in those surveys to local areas using drivers such as the accommodation stock and occupancy which influence the distribution of tourism activity at local level. For further information on the Cambridge Model and the terms used in this report please see Appendix 1 which accompanies this report. For an overview of 2015, including key facts about the economy, weather and key events please see Appendix 2of this report. 3

Value of Tourism 2015 West Oxfordshire Key Facts 518,400 Staying visitor trips 1,5,000 Staying visitor nights 110,840,000 Staying visitor spend 3,724,000 Day visits 123,09,000 Day visitor spend 234,449,000 Direct visitor spend 12,254,000 Other related spend 24,703,000 TOTAL VISITOR RELATED SPEND 282,122,000 TOTAL BUSINESS TURNOVER SUPPORTED 4,795 Estimated actual employment 3,49 FTE employment 10% Proportion of all employment 4

West Oxfordshire Staying visits Information on staying visits is derived from the Great Britain Tourism Survey (GBTS) for domestic visitors and from the International Passenger Survey (IPS) for Overseas visitors. The methodology of both surveys has been stable since 200 allowing for direct comparison between years and the analysis of trend data. Data at a county level is derived from the national surveys for trips, nights and spend but adjusted to account for local data and modelled below this level. 5

West Oxfordshire Staying visits comparisons All staying trips All staying nights All staying spend 00 500 400 300 200 100 0 35 545 327 335 284 304 518 1,800 1,00 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 00 400 200 0 99 1,702 998 895 778 830 1,5 140 120 100 80 0 40 20 0 71 125 4 1 47 57 111 Area Domestic trips (000 s) Overseas trips (000 s) Domestic nights (000 s) Overseas nights (000 s) Domestic spend (millions) Overseas spend (millions) Cheltenham 311 45 88 308 51 19 Cotswold 487 58 1,312 390 97 28 Forest of Dean 287 40 99 299 44 20 Gloucester 292 43 2 29 44 17 Stroud 250 35 58 210 35 13 Tewkesbury 27 37 11 219 43 15 West Oxfordshire 44 72 1,022 544 7 34

West Oxfordshire Staying visits by accommodation type Domestic tourists Trips Nights Spend Serviced 283,900 518,000 59,51,000 Self catering 15,700 39,000 2,534,000 Touring caravans /tents 3,500 117,000 4,15,000 Static vans/holiday centres 0 0 0 Group/campus 0 0 0 Paying guest in private homes 0 0 0 Second homes 10,100 91,000 2,797,000 Boat moorings 0 0 0 Other 1,00,000 129,000 Staying with friends and relatives 98,500 250,000 7,097,000 Total 44,400 1,022,000 7,33,000 Overseas tourists Trips Nights Spend Serviced 23,500 81,000 11,959,000 Self catering 12,100 88,000 3,805,000 Touring caravans /tents 4,700 34,000 1,488,000 Static vans/holiday centres 0 0 0 Group/campus 0 0 0 Paying guest in private homes 0 0 0 Second homes 1,200 31,000 2,27,000 Boat moorings 0 0 0 Other 400 3,000 248,000 Staying with friends and relatives 30,000 30,000 14,701,000 Total 72,000 544,000 34,477,000 7

West Oxfordshire Staying visits by purpose Domestic tourists Trips Nights Spend Holiday 288,000 754,000 4,347,000 Business 10,000 17,000 23,13,000 Visits to friends and relatives 4,000 91,000 5,27,000 Other,000 10,000 1,577,000 Study 0 0 0 Total 44,000 1,022,000 7,33,000 100% 80% 0% 40% 20% 0% Trips 7% 11% 43% 40% 93% 89% 58% 0% Holiday Business VFR Other UK Overseas Nights 100% 80% 12% 2% Overseas tourists Trips Nights Spend Holiday 21,000 98,000 7,807,000 Business 13,000 59,000,742,000 Visits to friends and relatives 34,000 318,000 1,57,000 Other 4,000 8,000 3,352,000 Study 0 0 0 Total 72,000 544,000 34,477,000 0% 40% 20% 0% 100% 80% 0% 78% 87% 88% 74% 22% 13% Holiday Business VFR Other UK Overseas Spend 14% 23% 7% 8% 40% 8% 77% 20% 0% 24% 32% Holiday Business VFR Other UK Overseas 8

West Oxfordshire Day visits Information on day visits within this report has been derived from the 2015 Great Britain Day Visit Survey (GBDVS). The survey, which was first undertaken in 2011, provides a much needed update on day visit activity in Great Britain and generally speaking estimated greater frequencies of trip taking than the previous day visit survey (England Leisure Visits Survey 2005). As a result of the new methodology in 2011 comparisons with previous day visit estimates are not possible. The GBDVS distinguishes between day visits to a town or city; to the seaside and coast; and to the countryside. Different drivers are used within the model to distribute these trips. Local drivers such as attraction footfall, quality and size of countryside and coastline are factored into the model for this purpose. 9

West Oxfordshire Day visits comparisons All day visits All day visit spend Tewkesbury, 8% West Oxfordshire, 17% Cheltenham, 8% Cotswold, 29% Tewkesbury, 8% West Oxfordshire, 1% Cheltenham, 10% Cotswold, 2% Stroud, 12% Gloucester, 14% Forest of Dean, 10% Stroud, 12% Gloucester, 17% Forest of Dean, 10% Area Day visits Day visit spend Cheltenham 1.8 75.9 Cotswold.4 19.4 Forest of Dean 2.3 72.2 Gloucester 3.2 130. Stroud 2.7 92.7 Tewkesbury 1.8 1.4 West Oxfordshire 3.7 123. 10

West Oxfordshire Day visits by location Total day visits Total day visit spend 3,724,000 123,09,000 Countryside visits, 2,198,000 Day visits Countryside visits, 58,901,000 Day visit spend Urban visits, 1,52,000 Urban visits, 4,708,000 11

West Oxfordshire Direct visitor expenditure by category Information on the breakdown of visitor spending is available from the three main tourism and day visitor surveys by type of visitor. The Model divides the expenditure between five sectors: Accommodation Shopping for gifts, clothes and other goods Eating and drinking in restaurants, cafes and inns Entry to attractions, entertainment and hire of goods and services Transport and travel costs including public transport, purchase of fuel and parking The following pages look at the breakdown of this expenditure and business turnover arising from this expenditure. By applying the expenditure breakdown to the estimates of visitor spending the Model generates estimates of total spending by the five business sectors. Visitor expenditure in each sector represents additional turnover for businesses in those sectors. However, evidence from national studies suggests that some minor adjustments are required to match visitor spend to business turnover. In particular, some expenditure on food and drink actually takes place in inns and hotels that fall into the accommodation sector and at attractions. The turnover for each business sector has therefore been adjusted to take account of these marginal changes. More significantly, expenditure on travel costs associated with individual trips is as likely to take place at the origin of the trip as it is at the actual destination. It is therefore assumed that only 0% of total travel expenditure accrues to the destination area. 12

West Oxfordshire Direct visitor expenditure by category Accommodation UK staying visitors 28,837,000 Overseas staying visitors 9,400,000 Shopping UK staying visitors 8,40,000 Overseas staying visitors 9,79,000 Day visitors 39,54,000 Food & drink UK staying visitors 17,371,000 Overseas staying visitors 7,847,000 Day visitors 51,404,000 Attractions/entertainment UK staying visitors 7,125,000 Overseas staying visitors 3,90,000 Day visitors 1,828,000 Travel UK staying visitors 14,390,000 Overseas staying visitors 3,527,000 Day visitors 15,723,000 13

West Oxfordshire Other visitor related expenditure by category Second Homes 4,170,000 Visiting friends and relatives (non visitor spend) 8,084,000 Spend on second homes estimates cover rates, maintenance, and replacement of furniture and fittings.. Additional spending is incurred by friends and relatives as a result of people coming to stay with them. 14

West Oxfordshire Business turnover Turnover derived from trip expenditure Staying visitor related Day visitor related Total Accommodation 38,742,000 1,028,000 39,770,000 Retailing 18,252,000 39,257,000 57,509,000 Catering 24,42,000 49,82,000 74,324,000 Attractions/entertainment 11,48,000 17,739,000 29,207,000 Transport 10,750,000 9,434,000 20,184,000 Arising from non trip spend 12,254,000 0 12,254,000 Total Direct 115,928,000 117,320,000 233,248,000 *Adjustments have been made to recognise that some spending on retail and food and drink will fall within attractions or accommodation establishments. It is assumed that 40% of travel spend will take place at the origin of the trip rather than at the destination. Total business turnover supported by tourism activity Staying visitor related Day visitor related Total Direct 115,928,000 117,320,000 233,248,000 Supplier and income induced 27,997,000 20,877,000 48,874,000 Total 143,925,000 138,197,000 282,122,000 15

West Oxfordshire Tourism related employment Having identified the value of turnover generated by visitor spending in each business sector it is possible to estimate the employment associated with that spending. The use of visitor expenditure to generate job numbers underestimates the number of jobs arising in the attractions/entertainment sector. The underestimate arises because local authorities and voluntary bodies do not always seek to recoup the full operating costs of individual attractions of facilities from entrance charges. Therefore an additional percentage of direct employment is added to the attractions sector estimates to take account of this factor. This section of the report looks at employment on three levels; Direct Jobs Direct jobs are those in businesses in receipt of visitor spending. For example, jobs supported by visitor spending at a hotel would be direct jobs. Indirect Jobs Indirect employment arises as a result of expenditure by businesses in direct receipt of visitor expenditure on the purchase of goods and services for their businesses. For example, some of the employment at a business supplying food and drink may be supported through the supplies that the business sells to hotels (or any other business in direct receipt of visitor expenditure). Induced Jobs Induced jobs are those that are supported by the spending of wages by employees in direct and indirect jobs. Such spending will be spread across a wide range of service sectors. Estimates are shown for actual jobs and full time equivalent jobs (FTE s). 1

West Oxfordshire Tourism related employment Estimated actual employment Direct 3,910 Indirect 9 Induced 188 Total 4,795 Full time equivalent employment (FTE s) Direct Indirect Induced Total 2,93 11 15 3,49 Direct employment in businesses in receipt of visitor expenditure (FTE s) Staying visitor related Day visitor related Total Accommodation 522 14 53 Retailing 125 28 393 Catering 341 95 1,03 Attractions/entertainment 15 255 420 Transport 1 53 114 Arising from non trip spend 195 0 195 Total Direct 1,408 1,285 2,93 17