Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) nd Quarter

Similar documents
Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) rd Quarter

Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) 2014 Year End

Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) th Quarter

Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) nd Quarter

Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) rd Quarter

Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) st Quarter

Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) th Quarter

Measures & Projections October 31, GoToBermuda.com

TOURISM PERFORMANCE 2017

January 2018 Air Traffic Activity Summary

TOURISM PERFORMANCE 2017

Evaluating Lodging Opportunities

BUSINESS BAROMETER December 2018

Coast to coast. STR Coastal Town Review Coastal Towns Market Review Report_JE.indd 3

EFFECTS OF CITYWIDE CONVENTIONS ON DOWNTOWN VANCOUVER HOTELS IN 2016

Tourism Snapshot A Monthly Monitor of the Performance of Canada s Tourism Industry

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Panama City Beach CVB Travel Market Preliminary Report. Prepared for: Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau

IATA ECONOMICS BRIEFING AIRLINE BUSINESS CONFIDENCE INDEX OCTOBER 2010 SURVEY

DTTAS Quarterly Aviation Statistics Snapshot Quarter Report

DTTAS Quarterly Aviation Statistics Snapshot Quarter Report

1. Hotel Trends Occupancy Rate

Sound Transit Operations March 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Note: These Louisiana indicators show the percentage difference from Second Quarter 2004 to Second Quarter 2005.

Loudoun County Lodging Study

Compustat. Data Navigator. White Paper: Lodging Industry-Specific Data

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Growth in hotel activity supported by the external market

Oct-17 Nov-17. Travel is expected to grow over the coming 6 months; at a slower rate

Louisiana Travel Pulse September 2007

visitor insights 2016

2004 SOUTH DAKOTA MOTEL AND CAMPGROUND OCCUPANCY REPORT and INTERNATIONAL VISITOR SURVEY

GoToBermuda.com. Q4 Arrivals and Statistics at December 31 st 2015

Significant increase in accommodation activity but slightly less than in the previous month

Construction Industry Focus Survey. Sample

Tourism Statistics RTO 1

Panama City Beach Travel Market Economic Impact Report. Prepared for: Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau

Asheville Metro Economic Report 2014 Second Quarter

Yukon Tourism Indicators Year-End Report Yukon Tourism Indicators Year-End Report 2015

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Loudon County, TN. Hotel, Restaurant, and Travel Industries: Economic Profile and Business Trends, Loudon County (Loudon and Lenoir City areas)

AUCKLAND DESTINATION OVERVIEW

Maury County, TN. Hotel, Restaurant, and Travel Industries: Economic Profile and Business Trends, Maury County (Columbia and Spring Hill area)

Billings Area COC. For the Month of December 2010 Date Created: Jan 18, 2011

DTTAS Quarterly Aviation Statistics Snapshot Quarter Report

METROPOLITAN BOSTON DECEMBER Boston Area Roundup

Easter boosts results in tourism accommodation

Visit Loudoun 2016 Lodging Market Research

Main indicators kept growing

Steep increases in overnight stays and revenue

Tourism Statistics Region 1

Tourism Snapshot A Monthly Monitor of the Performance of Canada s Tourism Industry

The Economic Impact of Travel in Kansas. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2013

Cheatham County, TN. Hotel, Restaurant, and Travel Industries: Economic Profile and Business Trends, 2006

The Travel and Tourism Industry in Vermont. A Benchmark Study of the Economic Impact of Visitor Expenditures on the Vermont Economy 2005

Residents ensure increase on overnight stays in hotels and similar establishments

HOTEL INDUSTRY OVERVIEW. Texas

Economic Impact of Tourism. Cambridgeshire 2010 Results

49 May-17. Jun-17. Travel is expected to grow over the coming 6 months; at a slower rate

Jan-18. Dec-17. Travel is expected to grow over the coming 6 months; at a slower rate

TOURISM PERFORMANCE 2017

1. Hotel Trends Occupancy Rate

Tourism Snapshot A Monthly Monitor of the Performance of Canada s Tourism Industry

PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

Chattanooga & Hamilton Co. Tourism Trends & Economic Outlook

Louisiana Travel Pulse May 2007

AUCKLAND DESTINATION OVERVIEW

CCC Announces 2009 Casino Revenue

Oct-17 Nov-17. Sep-17. Travel is expected to grow over the coming 6 months; at a slightly faster rate

Sound Transit Operations January 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode

Tourism Snapshot A Monthly Monitor of the Performance of Canada s Tourism Industry

Tourism Snapshot A Monthly Monitor of the Performance of Canada s Tourism Industry

Sound Transit Operations June 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

AUCKLAND DESTINATION OVERVIEW

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. October 2017

Tourism Snapshot A Monthly Monitor of the Performance of Canada s Tourism Industry

1. Hotel Trends Occupancy Rate

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER 2017

2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Canterbury Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Tourism Snapshot A Monthly Monitor of the Performance of Canada s Tourism Sector

Tourism Snapshot A Monthly Monitor of the Performance of Canada s Tourism Industry

STELLAR MARTINEAU PLACE LP

Economic Impact of Tourism. Norfolk

Easter boosts results in tourism accommodation

Panama City Beach CVB Visitor Profile & Economic Impact Report. Prepared for: Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau

Billings Area COC. For the Month of April 2017 Date Created: May 17, 2017

Sound Transit Operations March 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode

Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2009

Tourism Snapshot A Monthly Monitor of the Performance of Canada s Tourism Industry

Passenger Traffic Achieves Strong Growth of 4.8% for the Month of August

Housing in Hobart: an overview of the data. Richard Eccleston, Lisa Denny, Julia Verdouw & Kathleen Flanagan University of Tasmania May 2018

Hotel Association of North Texas. Karrie Keen Director, Destination and Trend Operations

Kent Visitor Economy Barometer 2016

Tourism Statistics RTO 11

Tourism Performance Summary Q

Sound Transit Operations August 2015 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Transcription:

Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) 20 2nd Quarter Prepared by Brian J. Tyrrell, Ph.D. Supported by Rummy Pandit, M.B.A., L.P.D., C.H.A. Executive Director

Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) 20 2nd Quarter Prepared by Brian J. Tyrrell, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Hospitality and Tourism Management Studies Table of Contents Acknowledgements...ii Table of Figures...iii Introduction...1 Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee...3 Atlantic County Lodging Fee...5 Non-Casino Lodging Performance in Atlantic County: Occupancy, Average Daily Rate (ADR) and Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR)..8 June 20 Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) Snapshot...11 Acknowledgements Supported by Rummy Pandit, M.B.A., L.P.D., C.H.A. Executive Director, Lloyd D. Levenson Institute of Gaming, Hospitality and Tourism The Lloyd D. Levenson Institute of Gaming, Hospitality & Tourism (LIGHT) and the authors of the Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI), Dr. Brian Tyrrell and Dr. Rummy Pandit, would like to thank the many individuals and organizations in the Atlantic City region and throughout New Jersey for their contributions to this report. In particular, the New Jersey Casino Control Commission was invaluable in providing the bulk of the data for this report. The Atlantic City Alliance and the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement were invaluable in helping to revise the current version of the AC-TPI. Indeed, STR, Incorporated contributed heavily as well to the revamped version of the AC-TPI, contributing supply figures to adjust the Atlantic County Lodging Fee, as well as supplying non-casino Occupancy, Average Daily Rate and Revenue per Available Room data. The LIGHT advisory board members contributions were instrumental to the completion of this report and their ongoing support is much appreciated. Their review, feedback and encouragement are evident throughout this report and it quite simply could not have been completed without their support. Thanks to all who contributed in the past and those that will likely add to that contribution in the future. We are indebted to you for your insight. ii

Table of Figures Figure 1: Casino Compared to Non-Casino Lodging Rooms for the Atlantic City Region, Before and After the 2014 Casino Closures Figure 2: Atlantic City Casino Parking Supply, January 2005 through June 20 Figure 3: Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee per 100 Parking Spaces January 2005 to June 20 Figure 4: Year over Year (YoY) Change in the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee per 100 Parking Spaces, July 2014 to June 20 Figure 5: 12 Month Trailing Total for the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee per 100 Parking Spaces, December 2005 to June 20 Figure 6: Atlantic County Monthly Lodging Room Supply, January 2005 through June 20 Figure 7: Atlantic County Lodging Fee per 100 Rooms, January 2005 to June 20 Figure 8: Year over Year (YoY) Change in the Atlantic County Lodging Fee per 100 Rooms, July 2014 to June 20 Figure 9: 12 Month Trailing Total for the Atlantic County Lodging Fee per 100 Rooms, December 2005 to June 20 Figure 10: Year over Year (YoY) Change in Atlantic County Occupancy, July 2014 to June 20 Figure 11: Year over Year (YoY) Change in Atlantic County Average Daily Rate (ADR), July 2014 to June 20 Figure 12: Year over Year (YoY) Change in Atlantic County Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR), July 2014 to June 20 Figure 13: June 20 Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC- TPI) Snapshot stockton.edu Stockton University is an AA/EO institution. iii

1 Introduction For several years, the Lloyd D. Levenson Institute of Gaming, Hospitality and Tourism (LIGHT) has been producing the Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) as a quarterly report describing nongaming revenue for the Atlantic City region. The impetus for the report was the changing dynamics with respect to gaming supply in the U.S. northeast, particularly following the introduction of Pennsylvania gaming in 2006. The increased competition for the gaming dollar resulted in significant gaming dollar losses for the Atlantic City region. However, there continued to be growth in non-gaming revenue for the Atlantic City region, growth that was not garnering attention in light of the regional declines in gaming. The dynamics changed again in 2014, this time internal to the region, as four casinos (Atlantic Club, Showboat, Revel and Trump Plaza) ceased operation during the calendar year. The AC-TPI analyzed changes in three taxes whose combined revenues were driven either exclusively (the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee) or significantly (Atlantic County Lodging Fee and the Atlantic City Luxury Tax) by revenue generated at casino properties in Atlantic City. Since there were significantly fewer parking spaces and hotel rooms at casino properties, these fees undoubtedly would be lower. Yet much of the business from these four closures remained captured by the Atlantic City casino market. Per property performance for the remaining casinos in the Atlantic City market increased. This restructuring of the local marketplace dynamics required a change in the manner in which the AC-TPI captures performance of non-gaming for the Atlantic City region. Originally, the AC-TPI settled on the three taxes for two main reasons. First, the taxes were publicly available and therefore easily verified. Second, because of some unique characteristics of the market place, certain measures that are commonly used to measure hotel performance were not available for the Atlantic City region. Specifically, many destinations describe the dynamics of their local hospitality industry using lodging Occupancy, Average Daily Rate (ADR) and Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR). STR, Incorporated solicits owners of lodging properties to supply operating performance on either a monthly or a daily basis, and the provider in turn receives, for a fee, feedback on their performance relative to their local competitive set. Destinations can purchase the

data to describe their total performance over time, and many regularly do. Unfortunately, for the Atlantic City region, the casino hotels do not participate in this program. The Trend Reports for the region thus do not capture the most significant driver of revenue for the Atlantic City region, namely the casinos. Still, the Trend Report does capture a significant portion of the non-casino lodging in the Atlantic City region. Since the closure of the four casino properties in 2014, that portion of the local lodging industry has grown significantly. Figure 1 shows that the month prior to the first of the four closures, December 2013, non-casino lodging accounted for 24% of the Atlantic City region (Atlantic County N.J.). One year later, after all four closures, the December 2014 non-casino lodging accounted for 29% of lodging in the Atlantic City region. Thus, there is a growing need for performance measures for the Atlantic City region that separate out the performance of the non-casino lodging industry and report the Occupancy, ADR and RevPAR that STR, Incorporated provides. While it will certainly not suffice alone to describe lodging performance, it can supplement our use of the Atlantic County Lodging Fee which does capture the performance of the casino properties in Atlantic City. Figure 1: Casino Compared to Non-Casino Lodging Rooms for the Atlantic City Region, Before and After the 2014 Casino Closures 8 6 4 76% 24% 71% 29% Indeed, in choosing to begin including the Occupancy, ADR and RevPAR of non-casino lodging in the Atlantic City region, we provide a balance to the AC-TPI which has always reported the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee, a casino-only fee. We additionally removed the Atlantic City Luxury Fee in the most current AC-TPI, a measure that we had previously included as it captures some entertainment and beverage revenue, but for which there is significant overlap with the Atlantic County Lodging Fee. That the Luxury Fee was primarily generated from the sale of lodging properties meant the two fees tracked very similarly and thus represented significant overlap. Further, to account for the changing supply of casino parking spaces and casino lodging rooms, the two fees that we previously included in the report, the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee and the Atlantic County Hotel Fee, will be reported as the figures per available supply. Such reporting will assist in signaling changing dynamics moving forward, while still providing comparable base-line performance given the significant changes over time to the supply of both. The current version of the Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) now provides a much clearer picture of the performance of nongaming revenues on a per property basis for the Atlantic City region. The enhanced measures provide insight into not only non-gaming tourism performance measures, but can now also distinguish between casino-only measures (Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee) and non-casino measures (STR, Incorporated figures for Occupancy, ADR and RevPAR). Meanwhile, we retain a measure of the entire Atlantic City region s tourism performance by retaining the Atlantic County Lodging Fee. The current report details performance of all these measures through June of 20. 2 Casino Lodging December 2013 Non-Casino Lodging December 2013 Casino Lodging December 2014 Non-Casino Lodging December 2014 2

Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee The Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee data is provided by the NJ Casino Control Commission (NJCCC). This figure serves as a surrogate for transportation, assuming that if the number of vehicles taxed has gone up or down, then so too will other expenditures on transportation to and from as well as within the resort. The tax is described by the NJCCC as: By law, casinos remit a fee of $3.00 per day for each parking space used by patrons in their facility. $0.50 of the parking fee is deposited into the Casino Revenue Fund, with the remaining $2.50 forwarded to the Casino Reinvestment Development Authority for public projects in Atlantic City. The commission audits and certifies the amounts payable by each casino under the law. The fee, charged to patrons of the casino hotel parking garages, is necessarily subject to the number of available parking spaces. Over the past 10 years there have been some significant changes to the supply of casino hotel parking spaces. Figure 2 shows that the monthly supply, calculated as the number of available parking spaces times the number of days in the month. The largest gain during that time frame occurred following the opening of Revel, adding more than 7.6 thousand daily parking spaces, an increase of 237 thousand (18%) for March 2012 compared to March 2011. In mid-january 2014, the Atlantic Club closed, reducing the supply by 1.4 thousand daily parking spaces. Three more casinos closed in September of 2014; the Showboat and Revel, both at the beginning of the month, followed by Trump Plaza in mid-september. The impact of these three closures further reduced the daily parking spaces available at casino hotels in Atlantic City by 2.6 thousand, 3.4 thousand and 7.6 thousand respectively. The most recent monthly supply figures for casino parking spaces in Atlantic City indicates there were 1.1 million available parking spaces in June 20, a reduction of 411 thousand or a 28% decrease from June 2014. These significant shifts in the number of parking spaces presents a challenge when analyzing the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee over time. Particularly with the most recent closures, simply examining the total fee provides little insight about per property performance relative to driving visitation to the remaining casinos. In order to account for this, we present, in Figure 3, the Atlantic Casino Parking Fee on a per supply basis (per 100 parking spaces) utilizing the figures displayed in Figure 2. Figure 3 is labeled with the annual Figure 2: Atlantic City Casino Parking Supply, January 2005 to June 20 Figure 3: Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee per 100 Parking Spaces January 2005 to June 20 Millions 2 2 1 1 Oct-05 1.4 Mar-12 1.6 Feb-12 1.2 Jan-14 1.5 Jun-14 1.5 1.5 1.1 Feb- 1.0 $300 $200 $100 Jul-05 $274 Jul-06 $285 Dec-05 $193 Jan-05 $168 Jan-07 $219 Jul-07 $269 Jan-08 $188 Aug-08 $274 Dec-08 $179 Aug-09 $254 Jul-10 $241 Feb-10 $160 Dec-10 $142 Jul-11 $234 Jul-12 $200 Mar-12 $2 Nov-12 $104 Aug-13 $194 Jun-14 $5 Jan-14 $1 $184 $175 Feb- $141 - $0 Parking Supply Parking Fee per 100 Spaces 3

high (labeled above the data series) and the annual low (below the data series) for each of the past 10 years. Highs occur in July or August, with the best recorded month occurring in July 2006 ($285) and the current 12 month best occurring in August 2014 ($184). Typically, the slowest month is recorded in the winter months, the exception being March 2012 ($2) and November 2012 ($104), the latter of which being the result of Hurricane Sandy. The highest annual low recorded was in January 2007 ($219). The low in the past twelve months was recorded in February 20 ($141). Figure 4 shows the year over year change in the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee per 100 parking spaces for the prior 12 months. Following the closures of the final three properties in September of 2014, significant gains were seen in revenue when examining the tax on a per parking space basis. Double-digit gains were realized in each of the past four months (March 20 through June 20), and six of the past twelve months (to include October 2014 and January 20 in addition to the past four months). Per property performance has increased on average for each month during the past ten months, dating back to the final casino closures of 2014. Clearly not all of the business previously captured by the Atlantic Club, Showboat, Revel and Trump Plaza was lost from the Atlantic City region, results that are in keeping with recently reported figures for gaming revenue in Atlantic City on a per property basis. Given the seasonal nature of the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee (see Figure 3), it is perhaps easier to visualize the long term trend by examining the 12 month trailing total for the fee. Figure 5 shows the 12 month trailing total for the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee per 100 parking spaces. The 12 months ending in May 2007 produced the highest Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee per 100 parking spaces at $242. The per available space fee accelerated its decline after the opening of Revel in March 2012. Since the last of the closures in 2014, however, this figure has been on the rise. This perhaps signals a balance on the supply and demand characteristics in the wake of the decrease in supply. In June of 20 the twelve month trailing total averaged $162, 8.7% higher than the June of 2014 figure ($149). Continuing to monitor the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee on a per 100 parking space basis will prove useful in determining if the per property performance we saw in the final months of 2014 and beginning of 20 signals a reversal in this long trend. Increases in per property performance can induce job and wage growth if sustainable, as well as reinvestment in the properties performing well. Figure 4: Year over Year (YoY) Change in the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee per 100 Parking Spaces, July 2014 to June 20 3 Jan- 24% Oct-14 Apr- May- 2 % Mar- 14% 12% 1 Sep-14 5% Nov-14Dec-14 5% 6% Feb- 8% 16% 12% Figure 5: 12 Month Trailing Total for the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee per 100 Parking Spaces, December 2005 to June 20 $300 $200 May-07 $242 Jun-14 $149 $162-1 Jul-14-6% -5% $100-2 -3 Jul-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov- 14 Dec-14 Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- $0 YoY Change 12 Month Parking Fee per 100 Spaces 4

Atlantic County Lodging Fee The Atlantic County Lodging Fee, the Atlantic County portion of the State Occupancy Fee, is utilized in this report to get a clearer picture of lodging performance for the region. While this figure is not Atlantic City specific, there is general consensus that the Atlantic City tourism market impacts the hotel industry throughout the county and thus is a reliable measure of the Atlantic City tourism economy. The figure is released by the NJ Division of Taxation and is described as: Legislation enacted in 2003 (P.L. 2003, c. 114) imposed a 7% State Occupancy Fee on the rent for every occupancy of a room in a hotel, motel or similar facility in most New Jersey municipalities, between August 1, 2003 and June 30, 2004. For occupancies on and after July 1, 2004, the Fee was reduced to 5%. A hotel/motel is a building regularly used and kept open for the lodging of guests, including bed and breakfasts, inns, etc. The State Occupancy Fee is imposed on the room rentals that are currently subject to the 7% New Jersey sales tax and is in addition to the sales tax. Special Rate Provisions: Since Newark, Jersey City, Atlantic City, Wildwood, Wildwood Crest, and North Wildwood already impose local taxes or fees on hotel/motel occupancies, the new State Occupancy Fee is imposed at a lower rate in... Atlantic City (1%)... The same challenges that confront the continued reporting of the total revenue generated under the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee also affect the reporting of the Atlantic County Lodging Fee total revenue. Namely, the closure of the four casinos in 2014 greatly reduced the supply of rooms in the Atlantic City region. Figure 6 (next page) shows the Atlantic County monthly lodging room supply from January 2005 through June 20, figures drawn from the STR, Incorporated Trend Report. Notable increases in the supply can be seen in July 2008 with the opening of the Chairman s Tower at the Trump Taj Mahal, and again in May 2012 with the opening of the Revel. Conversely, notable decreases in the supply occur in January 2014 with the closure of the Atlantic Club (809 rooms), and again following August 2014, after which time the remaining three closures of the Showboat (1,329 rooms), Revel (1,339 rooms) and Trump Plaza (906 rooms) occurred. In total, the four property closures would reduce the monthly supply of rooms in Atlantic County from 754 thousand in June 2014, to 639 thousand in June of 20, a decrease of %. 5

Figure 6: Atlantic County Monthly Lodging Room Supply, January 2005 through June 20 Thousands 1000 800 600 400 Jul-08 741 Jun-08 679 May-12 825 Mar-12 758 Jun-14 754 Feb-13 Feb-14 737 714 639 Feb- 581 Figure 7: Atlantic County Lodging Fee per 100 Rooms, January 2005 to June 20 $120 $100 $80 $60 Aug-05 $92 Aug-06 $97 Aug-07 $102 Aug-08 $99 Aug-09 $80 Jul-10 $90 Jul-11 $92 Jul-12 $86 Aug-13 $93 Jun-14 $73 $106 $77 200 0 $40 $20 $0 Jan-05 $27 Dec-05 $44 Jan-07 $38 Jan-08 $38 Dec-08 $32 Dec-09 $28 Dec-10 $29 Jan-12 $32 Nov-12 $49 Jan-14 $34 Dec-14 $32 Room Supply The supply of rooms displayed in Figure 6 is used to describe the Atlantic County Lodging Fee on a per 100 room basis in Figure 7. Figure 7 is labeled with the annual high (labeled above the data series) and the annual low (below the data series) for each of the past ten years. Similar to the Atlantic City Parking Fee described earlier in this report, highs occur in July or August. Unlike the parking fee however, the best recorded month occurred only recently in August 2014 at $106. Lows occur in December or January, with the notable exception of the Hurricane Sandy impacted month of November 2012, following which there occurred a series of months of increased hotel revenue as a result of displaced residents and demand for rooms by those assisting with the recovery efforts. The highest annual low recorded was in December 2005 ($44). The low in the past twelve months was recorded in December 2014 ($32). Figure 8 shows the year over year change in the Atlantic County Lodging Fee per 100 rooms for the prior 12 months. Once again, following the closures of the final three properties in September of 2014, significant gains were had in revenue when examining the tax on a per room basis. Double-digit gains were realized in August 2014 (13%) October 2014 (19%), January 20 (2) and February 20 (14%). Each of the past six month were positive, and ten of the past twelve. Similar to our analysis of the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee, it may be concluded that Jul-14 8% 13% Sep-14-1% Oct-14 19% Lodging Fee per 100 Rooms Figure 8: Year over Year (YoY) Change in the Atlantic County Lodging Fee per 100 Rooms, July 2014 to June 20 3 2 1-1 -2-3 Nov-14 3% Jul-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov- 14 Dec-14-6% Jan- 2 Feb- 14% Mar- 9% Apr- 8% May- 6% 6% Dec-14 Jan- Feb- Mar- YoY Change Lodging Fee per 100 Rooms Apr- May- 6

not all of the business previously captured by the Atlantic Club, Showboat, Revel and Trump Plaza was lost from the Atlantic City region, results in keeping with recently reported figures for gaming revenue in Atlantic City on a per property basis. Given the seasonal nature of the Atlantic County Lodging Fee (see Figure 7), it is again easier to visualize the long term trend by examining the 12 month trailing total for the fee. Figure 9 shows the 12 month trailing total for the Atlantic County Lodging Fee per 100 rooms. The 12 months ending in February 2008 produced the highest Atlantic County Lodging Fee per 100 rooms at $671. On a per property basis, declines may have given way to increases. The twelve months ending in June 20 averaged $618, or 10.7% higher than the twelve months ending in June 2014 ($558). Continuing to monitor the Atlantic County Lodging Fee on a per 100 room basis will prove useful in determining if the per property performance we saw in the final months of 2014 and beginning of 20 signals a sustainable reversal in this long trend. As previously mentioned, increases in per property performance can induce job and wage growth, as well as reinvestment in the properties, if sustainable. Figure 9: 12 Month Trailing Total for the Atlantic County Lodging Fee per 100 Rooms, December 2005 to June 20 $800 $600 Feb-08 $671 Jun-13 $566 Jun-14 $558 $618 $400 Jun-10 $483 $200 $0 12 Month Lodging Fee per 100 Rooms 7

Non-Casino Lodging Performance in Atlantic County: Occupancy, Average Daily Rate (ADR) and Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR) Figure 11: Year over Year (YoY) Change in Atlantic County Average Daily Rate (ADR), July 2014 to June 20 4 Data drawn from the STR Incorporated Trend Report provide valuable insight to the Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI): Occupancy, Average Daily Rate (ADR) and Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR). These three measures have long been a staple of analyzing lodging performance and have been adopted by numerous destination marketers across the globe in analyzing the health of a tourist destination s lodging industry. While these measures are not available for the casino properties in Atlantic City, they do provide valuable information nonetheless for the non-casino lodging properties in the Atlantic City region (Atlantic County). 2-2 Jul-14 6% 6% Sep-14 2% Oct-14 2% Nov-14 1% Dec-14-1% Jan- Feb- Mar- 6% Apr- 1% May- Figures 10 through 12 provide STR, Incorporated figures from the Trend Report, showing Occupancy, ADR and RevPAR for the most recent 12 month year over year performance as shown in Figures 10 through 12. It is notable that all three measures had at least nine of the twelve months -4 Jul-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov- 14 Dec-14 Jan- Feb- Mar- Average Daily Rate Apr- May- Figure 10: Year over Year (YoY) Change in Atlantic County Occupancy, July 2014 to June 20 4 Figure 12: Year over Year (YoY) Change in Atlantic County Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR), July 2014 to June 20 4 2 Jul-14 2% 2% Sep-14 Oct-14 2% Dec-14 2% Jan- 16% Feb- 3% May- 5% 1% 2 Jul-14 8% 8% Sep-14 2% Oct-14 4% Dec-14 1% Jan- 17% Mar- Feb- 6% 4% May- 5% 1% -2 Nov-14-4% Mar-Apr- -4% -4% -2 Nov-14-3% Apr- -3% -4 Jul-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov- 14 Dec-14 Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- -4 Jul-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov- 14 Dec-14 Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Occupancy Revenue per Available Room 8

showing positive year over year growth. The addition of Occupancy, Average Daily Rate (ADR) and Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR) provides valuable insight into non-casino lodging performance in the Atlantic City region. Of these three measures, RevPAR may be of the most value in determining longer term trends in the market place as RevPAR is a combination of both Occupancy and ADR (Occupancy multiplied by ADR is equal to RevPAR). As such, changes in RevPAR will be the summary variable for the non-casino lodging performance measure included in the AC-TPI Snapshot presented in the final section of this report. June 20 Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) Snapshot The Lloyd D. Levenson Institute of Gaming, Hospitality and Tourism 9

(LIGHT) has concluded that non-casino Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR) and the Atlantic City Casino Parking Fee and Atlantic County Hotel Fee (both on a per supply basis) can serve as an effective proxy for the performance of the tourism economy in Atlantic City. These measures, or more precisely the year over year change in the monthly figures for these measures, are compiled into an Atlantic City Tourism Performance Index Snapshot at the end of each quarter. A more detailed annual report is provided to give the longer term analysis of the Atlantic City tourism economy. We are grateful for the support of STR, Incorporated for supplying the RevPAR figures, the New Jersey Casino Control Commission for providing the Parking Fee, and the New Jersey Treasury for providing the Lodging Fee. The goal of the AC-TPI is to provide key measures with analysis that can describe the results of the resorts current efforts at revitalizing the Atlantic City tourism economy. Figure 13: June 20 Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) Snapshot 3 2 1 14% 16% 8% 12% 6% 6% 1% 9% 8% 5% 4% -1-3% -2-3 Apr- May- Prior 12 Months Parking Fee per Space Lodging Fee per Room Atlantic County Non-Casino RevPAR 10