HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY

Similar documents
Kingston Transportation Master Plan Draft Report Transit Forecasting 1

PORTS TORONTO Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport Summary of 2015 Traffic and Passenger Surveys

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2016 Economic Impact Report

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2014 Economic Impact Report

2011/12 Household Travel Survey Summary Report 2013 Release

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2012 Economic Impact Report

3. Aviation Activity Forecasts

ARRIVAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PASSENGERS INTENDING TO USE PUBLIC TRANSPORT

Scrappage for Equality

Assessment of Travel Trends

Visual and Sensory Aspect

The Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011

5 Rail demand in Western Sydney

PREFACE. Service frequency; Hours of service; Service coverage; Passenger loading; Reliability, and Transit vs. auto travel time.

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

2013 TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR SURVEY SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Employment Characteristics of Tourism Industries, 2011

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

2010 El Paso Work Place Travel Survey Technical Summary

2009 Muskoka Airport Economic Impact Study

TABLE OF CONTENTS. TOURIST EXPENDITURE 31 Average Spend per Person per Night ( ) 31 Tourist Expenditure per Annum ( ) 32

Estimating Tourism Expenditures for the Burlington Waterfront Path and the Island Line Trail

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

HEATHROW COMMUNITY NOISE FORUM

Agritourism in Missouri: A Profile of Farms by Visitor Numbers

Intercity Bus and Passenger Rail Study

Benefits and costs of tourism for remote communities

Baku, Azerbaijan November th, 2011

Commissioned by: Economic Impact of Tourism. Stevenage Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Economic Impact of Tourism. Hertfordshire Results. Commissioned by: Visit Herts. Produced by:

The Travel and Tourism Industry in Vermont. A Benchmark Study of the Economic Impact of Visitor Expenditures on the Vermont Economy 2005

High-Speed Railways in China: An Update on Passenger Profiles

The Economic Impact of Tourism Eastbourne Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Existing Services, Ridership, and Standards Report. June 2018

JATA Market Research Study Passenger Survey Results

HEATHROW COMMUNITY NOISE FORUM. Sunninghill flight path analysis report February 2016

LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF GRAPHS

Cedar Rapids Area Convention and Visitors Bureau Visitor Study

MODAIR. Measure and development of intermodality at AIRport

Project Deliverable 4.1.3d Individual City Report - City of La Verne

communication tower means a tower or structure built to support equipment used to transmit communication signals;

APPENDIX 8. Leeds Socio-Economic Baseline Report. Report. July Metro and Leeds City Council

Puerto Ricans in Ohio, the United States, and Puerto Rico, 2014

2004 SOUTH DAKOTA MOTEL AND CAMPGROUND OCCUPANCY REPORT and INTERNATIONAL VISITOR SURVEY

3. Proposed Midwest Regional Rail System

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Oxfordshire Estimates for 2013

Aurizon Network Public Quarterly Performance Report. 4th Quarter 2017/18 April - June 2018

FACILITIES INVENTORY SURVEY REPORT

T A S M A N I A N G A M B L I N G S E I S I S S U E S P A P E R. Background on the Social and Economic Impact Study of Gambling

Northern Ontario Passenger Vehicle Travel Profile

NTA Passenger Transport Surveys at Dublin, Cork and Shannon Airports Final Report

Aurizon Network Public Quarterly Performance Report 2nd Quarter 2017/18 October - December 2017

Presented by: Ms. Kanageswary Ramasamy Department of Statistics, Malaysia February 2017

Chapter 1: The Population of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

HOW TO IMPROVE HIGH-FREQUENCY BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY THROUGH SCHEDULING

CONGESTION MONITORING THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE. By Mike Curran, Manager Strategic Policy, Transit New Zealand

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

Big Cook s Pond Cottage Management Plan. Environmental Assessment Registration

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

new social approach for prioritising transport corridors in the metropolitan area of Barcelona (Spain)

Figure 1.1 St. John s Location. 2.0 Overview/Structure

UK household giving new results on regional trends

2011 WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE REGIONAL AIR PASSENGER SURVEY

Queenstown Lakes District Council. Review of District Plan Business Zones Capacity and Development of Zoning Hierarchy

TRANSPORT AFFORDABILITY INDEX

2015 Independence Day Travel Overview U.S. Intercity Bus Industry

Appraisal of Factors Influencing Public Transport Patronage in New Zealand

TransAction Overview. Introduction. Vision. NVTA Jurisdictions

Borders Railway: What is the impact two years on?

Juneau Household Waterfront Opinion Survey

Is Scarborough City Centre A Transit Village?

SYNOPSIS OF INFORMATION FROM CENSUS BLOCKS AND COMMUNITY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR TONOPAH, NEVADA

Alternatives. Introduction. Range of Alternatives

Oakland A s Gondola Economic Impact

Demand perspective: Measuring flows of visitors/ trips/ expenditure and their characterization in each form of tourism

Performance Indicator Horizontal Flight Efficiency

Travel Policy. This policy should be read in conjunction with the Travel Procedure & Guidelines and Travel Expense Procedure & Guidelines documents

Transit Vehicle Scheduling: Problem Description

CORNWALL VISITOR SURVEY 06/07. Final report. Produced by South West Tourism Research Department For and on behalf of Visit Cornwall.

Minimum Requirements References in National Park Service Policy

CAMPER CHARACTERISTICS DIFFER AT PUBLIC AND COMMERCIAL CAMPGROUNDS IN NEW ENGLAND

VALUE OF TOURISM. Trends from

The Economic Benefits of Agritourism in Missouri Farms

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development

STRATA DATA. Residential Strata in NSW A summary analysis. Issue 3, March City Futures Research Centre

The Economic Impact of Tourism New Forest Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Like many transit service providers, the Port Authority of Allegheny County (Port Authority) uses a set of service level guidelines to determine

Reducing Garbage-In for Discrete Choice Model Estimation

Central Coast Origin-Destination Survey

TOURISM SPENDING IN ALGONQUIN PROVINCIAL PARK

Poverty in Seychelles: Policy Digest

Transcription:

HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY

Household Travel Survey i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 SUMMARY OF TRAVEL... 2 2.1 All-Day Travel Patterns... 2 2.1.1 Automobile Availability... 2 2.1.2 Trip Purpose... 3 2.1.3 Mode of Travel... 5 2.1.4 Temporal Distribution of Trips... 6 2.1.5 Trip Length... 7 2.1.6 Geographic Distribution of Trips... 8 3.0 SURVEY DATA LIMITATIONS... 8 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Travel Survey Record Summary... 1 Table 2 Household Automobile Ownership... 2 Table 3 Trips by Trip Purpose... 4 Table 4 Mode of Travel... 5 Table 5 Percentage of Trips by Length and Mode of Travel... 7 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Household Automobile Ownership... 3 Figure 2 Trips by Trip Purpose... 4 Figure 3 Mode of Travel... 5 Figure 4 Trip Start Times by Mode of Travel... 6 Figure 5 Percentage of Trips by Length and Mode of Travel... 7 Figure 6 Percentage of Auto Trips to and from the Downtown During the P.M. Peak Period... 8 M:\PROJECTS\DRAFT\01\019040\Deliverables\Draft Report\Report Sections\Sections for City's Web Site\Travel Survey.doc

Household Travel Survey 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Kingston Transportation Master Plan study included a comprehensive household travel survey of the City of Kingston and surrounding area. The survey was conducted by telephone in January 2002. The survey was based on a random selection of listed telephone numbers in the study area. Travel data were collected from approximately 5% of households in the study area. The survey collected information on how household members use the transportation system of the City, and provided key information upon which the Travel Demand Model was based. Prior to undertaking the survey a letter was sent to the randomly selected households, informing household members of the survey and requested their participation. Notices of the survey were sent to the press, government officials, and police to ensure widespread knowledge of the travel survey, and compliance with survey staff. Data collected by the survey was grouped into three categories, household data, person data, and trip data. Trip data were collected regarding trips made by household members on the previous day to the survey. A number of questions were asked regarding each of these data categories: Household Data dwelling type (i.e. house, apartment), number of persons residing in the household, number of vehicles available for personal use, etc. Person Data age, gender, possession of a driver s licence, place of work or school, employment status, occupation. Trip Data beginning and end of all trips, trip purpose (i.e. work, shopping, school), start time of the trip, type of transportation used (i.e. car, bus, bicycle), etc. The survey data was then expanded to represent the total population of the study area using data obtained from the 2001 Canada Census. The following table presents the number of survey records captured by the survey for each data category, as well as the expanded data total. Table 1 Travel Survey Record Summary Data Category Survey Records Expanded Total Household Data 2,649 59,404 Person Data 6,303 142,034 Trip Data 16,045 356,841 Details of the travel survey are contained in Kingston Transportation Master Plan 2002 Travel Survey 2002 Data Guide, provided to the City of Kingston as a separate document.

Household Travel Survey 2 2.0 SUMMARY OF TRAVEL The survey provided a snap shot of the City s existing travel patterns, and was used to understand, where, and when Kingston s residents travel around the City. Given that an understanding of the magnitude and nature of travel is essential to anyone involved in shaping the City s urban areas, this section provides a brief summary of the travel patterns of City residents. 2.1 All-Day Travel Patterns Travel characteristics presented in the following sections are based directly on the expanded household, person, and trip databases developed from the travel survey. The data are summarized according to key descriptors of the transportation system: automobile availability, trip purpose, mode of travel, temporal distribution of trips, trip length, and geographic distribution of trips. Unless noted otherwise, the summaries represent all-day patterns of travel. 2.1.1 Automobile Availability The level of household auto ownership over the recent decades has been increasing worldwide, and is particularly high in North America. Correspondingly, the number of persons per vehicle has been decreasing. The proliferation on the automobile, and reliance on it as a mode of travel increases traffic congestion and contributes to environmental pollution. Auto ownership is also correlated to household income. In general, household automobile ownership increases with household income (Transportation Planning Handbook, Institute of Transportation Engineers). The survey data indicates an average of 1.34 vehicles per household. This corresponds to an average of 1.78 persons per automobile within the City. The number of vehicles per household is summarized in Table 2, and Figure 1. Table 2 Household Automobile Ownership Vehicles per Household Number of Households Percentage of Households 0 9,606 16% 1 25,025 42% 2 21,120 36% 3 2,942 5% 4 or more 710 1% Total 59,404 100%

Household Travel Survey 3 Figure 1 Household Automobile Ownership 2.1.2 Trip Purpose For the most part, travel is a derived activity, in that people do not travel for travel s own sake. Transportation occurs to facilitate community activities, both social and economic. Each trip is therefore made for a particular purpose. The purpose of the trip influences the mode of travel, the time the trip is made, and the length of the trip. Trips are defined as one-way movements that can be classified into one of five trip purpose categories. Home-based trips are trips that either begin or end at home. These trips make up over 80% of all trips within the City of Kingston. Trip purpose can be characterized according to the following five categories: Home-Based Shopping shopping trips that either begin or end at home (i.e. a trip from home to the store, or a trip from the store to home). Non Home-Based trips that neither begin nor end at home. Home-Based Other trips that either begin or end at home, that are not work, school, or shopping related (i.e. a trip from home to a medical clinic). Home-Based School school trips that either begin or end at home (i.e. a trip from home to school, or the trip from school to home). Home-Based Work work trips that either begin or end at home (i.e. a trip from home to work, or the trip from work to home).

Household Travel Survey 4 One important aspect of trip making behaviour is multipurpose trip making. A journey directly from work to home is an example of a single home-based work trip. However, a journey from work to home where the person stops at the supermarket to pick up some groceries is categorised as two trips. A non home-based trip (the trip from work to the supermarket), and a home-based shopping trip (the trip from the supermarket to home). Table 3 and Figure 2 presents the breakdown of all-day trips by trip purpose. Table 3 Trips by Trip Purpose Trip Purpose Number of Trips Percentage of Trips Home-Based Shopping 45,986 13% Non Home-Based 67,401 19% Home-Based Other 100,759 28% Home-Based School 54,499 15% Home-Based Work 88,196 25% Total 356,841 100% Figure 2 Trips by Trip Purpose

Household Travel Survey 5 2.1.3 Mode of Travel The various modes of transportation form the basic components of the transportation system. The proportion of daily trips made by different travel modes (automobile, transit, rail, bicycle, walking) vary from one city to another, and is in part affected by mode availability and convenience. For the City of Kingston, the automobile is the dominant mode of travel, accounting for over 80% of all person trips within the City. Table 4 and Figure 3 summarize the percentage of all-day person trips made by different travel modes. Table 4 Mode of Travel Trip Purpose Number of Trips Percentage of Trips Automobile 293,810 82% Transit 12,161 3% School Bus 10,315 3% Bicycle 1,823 1% Walk 38,380 11% Other 353 negligible Total 356,841 100% Figure 3 Mode of Travel

Household Travel Survey 6 It should be noted that automobile trips includes auto driver, auto passenger, as well as taxi trips. It is acknowledged that the annual percentage of walking trips and bicycle trips are likely greater than that captured by the travel survey, given that the survey was undertaken during the winter. 2.1.4 Temporal Distribution of Trips As noted earlier, transportation permits people to participate in community activities. It also facilitates the movement of goods through the community. It is reasonable to expect that these activities occur at different times of the day. Therefore, it is not surprising that the number of trips over the transportation network varies by time of day. Figure 4 illustrates the distribution of trip start times by mode of travel. Figure 4 Trip Start Times by Mode of Travel The above figure clearly illustrates the spikes in the trip profiles representing the morning and afternoon peak periods. The data indicated an A.M. peak period of 7:30 to 10:30, in which a total of 81,403 trips were made. The A.M. peak hour was noted to be between 7:45 and 8:45, in which a total of 38,169 trips were made. The data also indicated a P.M. peak period of 2:45 to 5:45, in which a total of 95,176 trips were made. The P.M. peak hour was noted to be between 3:45 and 4:45, in which a total of 34,181 trips were made. Looking at automobile trips only, a total of 24,117 trips were made in the P.M. peak hour from 4:15 to 5:15, and a total of 63,005 trips were made in the P.M. peak period between 3:00 to 6:00.

Household Travel Survey 7 2.1.5 Trip Length Trip length is another factor affecting travel. All other things being equal, people try to minimize their trip length. Trip length also has an influence on the mode of travel chosen by a traveller. The average all-day trip length for the City is 6.23 km. It should be noted that that trip lengths recorded in the survey is based on the straight-line trip length in kilometres rather than the actual length of the trip over the transportation network. Table 5 and Figure 5 the average trip lengths by mode of travel. Table 5 Percentage of Trips by Length and Mode of Travel Mode Trip Length (km) <2 2-5 5-10 10-20 >20 Total Automobile 23.4% 27.4% 17.6% 8.1% 5.9% 82% Transit 1.0% 1.6% 0.6% 0.2% 0% 3% School Bus 0.5% 1.1% 0.7% 0.3% 0.2% 3% Bicycle 0.4% 0.1% 0% 0% 05 1% Walk 10.2% 0.5% 0.1% 0% 0% 11% Other 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Total 36% 31% 19% 9% 6% 100% Figure 5 Percentage of Trips by Length and Mode of Travel

Household Travel Survey 8 2.1.6 Geographic Distribution of Trips The geographic distribution of trips over an urban area is directly related to the patterns of land use in relation to the transportation network. Figure 6 Illustrates the percentage of auto trips to and from the Downtown (Including Queen s University) during the P.M. peak period. Figure 6 Percentage of Auto Trips to and from the Downtown during the P.M. Peak Period 3.0 SURVEY DATA LIMITATIONS The travel data collected by the survey provides indispensable data regarding the travel undertaken by City of Kingston residents. The survey was comprehensive and captured a great deal of information regarding households, persons, and trips within the City. There are however, a number of points that should be kept in mind when interpreting the data: The survey was undertaken in the month of January. This ensured that it was conducted in the middle of the Winter 2002 academic term. The survey does not capture seasonal variation in travel patterns of city residents.

Household Travel Survey 9 Given that the survey data was derived from household telephone interviews: o The survey did not capture data regarding heavy vehicle or commercial traffic within the City; o The survey did not capture data regarding trips to Kingston that were made by persons residing outside the study area; o The survey did not capture information regarding trips made by persons residing outside the study area and travelling through the study area, particularly, through trips along Highway 401; and o The extent of travel undertaken by the City s student population may be less than complete, given that students living in residences may be underrepresented in the survey. Resident students may not have permanent phone lines. They may reside at a particular location on a temporary basis and thus, may not be present in Bell Canada s directory for that area. While the level of co-operation given by interviewed persons was noted to be quite high, the level of completeness of the household trip data collected during the interview is dependent upon the interviewee s knowledge of the trips make by other household members on the previous day. It is expected that there may be some underreporting of trips, particularly discretionary travel. Discretionary travel is defined as all trips other that home-based work and home-based school trips. Home-based trips are those trips that either begin or end at home. Each of the issues identified were addressed in developing the travel demand model for the City.