Market Assessment and Feasibility Analysis of a Nature-based Park in Oklahoma

Similar documents
Organizational and Financial Perspectives on State Parks

Cedar Rapids Area Convention and Visitors Bureau Visitor Study

2014 NOVEMBER ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND VISITOR PROFILE. Prepared By:

2012 In-Market Research Report. Kootenay Rockies

Tourism Impacts and Second Home Development in Pender County: A Sustainable Approach

Tourism Impacts and Second Home Development in Coastal Counties: A Sustainable Approach

2009/10 NWT Park User Satisfaction Survey Report

Visit South Walton Visitor Tracking Study: Summer Phillip Downs, Ph.D. Joseph St. Germain, Ph.D. Rachael Anglin Downs & St.

Irish Fair of Minnesota: 2017 Attendee Profile

2011 Visitor Profile Survey

Lord Howe Island Visitor Survey 2017

Tourism Kelowna Visitor Intercept Survey Findings by Season FINAL DRAFT REPORT

Economic Impact of Cultural Tourism in Palm Beach County

Central Wasatch Visitor Use Study STEVEN W. BURR, PH.D. AND CHASE C. LAMBORN, M.S. INSTITUTE FOR OUTDOOR RECREATION AND TOURISM UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY

1987 SUMMER USE SURVEY OF MINNESOTA STATE PARK VISITORS

Tourism Kelowna Visitor Intercept Survey Findings FINAL DRAFT REPORT

2010 Nova Scotia Visitor Exit Survey Regional Report

2013 IRVING HOTEL GUEST SURVEY Final Project Report

Economic And Social Values of Vermont State Parks 2002

2015 IRVING HOTEL GUEST SURVEY Final Project Report

Visit South Walton. Visitor Tracking & ADR Study Fall 2017

2010 Nova Scotia Visitor Exit Survey Regional Report

NEWCASTLE VISITOR PROFILE AND SATISFACTION REPORT. Summary of results OCTOBER Image: Newcastle Marina, courtesy of Newcastle Tourism

2013 Business & Legislative Session Visitor Satisfaction Survey Results

Evaluating Lodging Opportunities

Agritourism in Missouri: A Profile of Farms by Visitor Numbers

2006 RENO-SPARKS VISITOR PROFILE STUDY

Visit South Walton Visitor Tracking Study: Summer Phillip Downs, Ph.D. Joseph St. Germain, Ph.D. Rachael Powell Kerr & Downs Research

Byron Shire Visitor Profile and Satisfaction Report: Summary and Discussion of Results

The Economic Benefits of Agritourism in Missouri Farms

2015/16 Mammoth Lakes Visitor Volume

2000 Roaring River State Park Visitor Survey

Economic Impact of Rock Climbing in the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests

Visitor Profile and Economic Impact Study

TOURISM VICTORIA FALL 2013 RESEARCH WORKSHOP

INFLUENCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ON SELECTING TOURISM DESTINATION

1987 SUMMER USE SURVEY OF MINNESOTA STATE PARK VISITORS

Mississippi Gulf Coast Visitor Study December 5, 2016

U. S. Hispanic Travelers Report

Civil War Preservation Trust. Civil War Preservation Trust Preserves Historic Battlefield Land. Civil War Preservation Trust

Estimating Tourism Expenditures for the Burlington Waterfront Path and the Island Line Trail

ECONOMIC PROFILE. Tourism

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Buncombe County, North Carolina

Visitors Experiences and Preferences at Lost Lake in Clatsop State Forest, Oregon

International Journal of Innovative Research in Management Studies (IJIRMS) ISSN (Online): Volume 1 Issue 3 April 2016

Visitor Profile Alabama Gulf Coast Convention & Visitors Bureau

The Travel & Tourism Industry in Vermont

Angus Visitor Survey. Findings from July 2016 to June tourism consumer insights. tourir

Prepared for: TOMM Committee Kangaroo Island CB Contact: Ben Nitschke, Account Manager Phone: (08)

5th Level Subagency Report. OSD, Agencies and Activities DIRECTOR CLINICAL SPT

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2013 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Downeast & Acadia

2003 Visitor Profile Alabama Gulf Coast Convention & Visitors Bureau

Papua New Guinea International Visitor Survey. January December 2017 Simon Milne

Oregon 2009 Visitor Report June, 2010

Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority. Results from Customer Survey 2017

Southwest Regional Recreation Authority Economic Impact Summary

2007 RENO-TAHOE VISITOR PROFILE STUDY

Creating a wealth of information and knowledge!

Farm Like a Women in Agritourism: Joining Efforts to Succeed!

The Travel and Tourism Industry in Vermont. A Benchmark Study of the Economic Impact of Visitor Expenditures on the Vermont Economy 2005

1.4 Previous research on New Zealand subantarctic tourism

Oregon 2011 Visitor Final Report

AAPA CRUISE SEMINAR Cayman Islands January 10, 2007

LAKE COVE HOTEL RESORT / REND LAKE

Measurement of the Economic Vitality of The Blue Ridge National Heritage Area

Franz Josef Glacier. newzealand.com. visitor experience. Market information about our Visitors and our Active Considerers

The Competitiveness of Iceland as a Destination for Tourists

SURVEY RESULTS: HOTEL AND HOSTEL GUESTS

State Park Visitor Survey

Panama City Beach CVB Travel Market Visitor Profile & Economic Impact Report

Computer Simulation for Evaluating Visitor Conflicts

INTERNATIONAL DRIVE ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. Luis Nieves-Ruiz, AICP Economic Development Program Manager March 29, 2017

TOURIST PROFILE AND PERCEPTION

2015 Brand Perception & Market Study Research. Prepared by

West Virginia 2011 Overnight Visitor Final Report

MOURNE & SLIEVE CROOB AONB. VISITORS SURVEY Summary Report

Lodging and Conference Center Analysis ECONOMIC AND REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS FOR SUSTAINABLE LAND USE OUTCOMES

Camper Cabins in National Forest Campgrounds. Jon Benson Recreation Specialist USDA Forest Service Superior National Forest

Copyright 2017 Curacao Tourist Board

An outdoor waterpark is a facility offering three or more waterslides and other aquatic facilities.

Agritourism: What does it mean for Rural NC?

VISIT ESTES PARK 2018 OPERATING PLAN

Third Quarter 2015 Visitor Profile (July-September) Amelia Island Tourist Development Council

Lake Placid Assessment Updated November 2008

1998 Pomme de Terre State Park Visitor Survey

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research Winter 2017 Seasonal Topline. Prepared by

Second Quarter 2015 Visitor Profile (April-June) Amelia Island Tourist Development Council

West Virginia 2009 Visitor Report December, 2010

Fourth Quarter 2013 Visitor Profile (October December) Amelia Island Tourist Development Council

First Quarter 2014 Visitor Profile (January March) Amelia Island Tourist Development Council

Impacts of Visitor Spending on the Local Economy: George Washington Birthplace National Monument, 2004

An Evaluation of Oregon s Fall 2012/Spring 2013 Advertising Campaigns. Final Report May 2014

PUHOI TO PAKIRI VISITOR SURVEY UPDATE. ( Simon Milne New Zealand Tourism Research Institute

Fall 2013 Visitor Profile Alabama Gulf Coast Convention & Visitors Bureau

2015 British Columbia Parks. Visitor Survey. Juan De Fuca Park. China Beach

Chapter 2: Amusement Park Foodservice Market Size and Forecast Market size and forecast summary

Prepared for: TOMM Committee Kangaroo Island CB Contact: Naomi Downer, Account Director Phone: (08)

Tourism Statistics

If You Build It, They Will Come : Relationship between Attraction Features and Intention to Visit

Tourism and Recreation Directions and Challenges

Transcription:

Market Assessment and Feasibility Analysis of a Nature-based Park in Oklahoma Tannaz Soltani, MBA, M.S. Catalina Palacios, M.S. Lowell Caneday, Ph.D.

Purpose To provide a better understanding of the market, preferred destination attributes, motivations, and satisfactions with a naturebased park. To assist management to identify their target market, recreation needs and preferences of the visitors. 2

Quartz Mountain Property Nature-based park Location Historic significance CCC One of the original Oklahoma State Parks 3

Quartz Mountain Property Assets of Quartz Mountain Nature Park Lodge, Performance Hall, bunkhouse, pavilions Golf course Campgrounds, cabins, group camp Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education 4

Quartz Mountain Analysis Feasibility analysis Market analysis Current market Latent market Competitive market Financial analysis Current operations Occupancy rates, revenue, cost 5

Market Analysis Current market Estimated 362,500 visitors annually Oklahoma Arts Institute Latent market North Texas, Oklahoma City, Lawton, Amarillo, Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex. Competitive market Failure to identify competition and market Limited true competition Potential competition: Chickasaw Nation properties, renovated Lake Murray Lodge 6

Methodology Quartz Mountain feasibility study for Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department (OTRD) Research team at Oklahoma State University IRB approval Quantitative Research Online Survey (Qualtrics) Oct 6 th, 2014 - Nov 10 th, 2014 7

Assessment of Current Market Existing instrument (Meng, Tepanon & Uysal, 2008) Five-point Likert scale Destination Attributes: Personnel Lodging facility Natural environment 8

Assessment of Current Market Motivations Satisfaction Two questions: Level of satisfaction with most recent visit Recommendations to family/friends Acceptance of price Demographics 9

Findings: Demographics Well-educated (71%) Upper income (more than $100,000) (45%) 20% Retired 55% Female Overnight visitors (86%) 10

Findings: Destination Attributes Preference Destination Attributes Means Critical attributes Cleanliness of the facility and park 4.54 Quality of the lodge rooms 4.38 Quality of the main lodge 4.38 Quality of food 4.32 Scenery around Quartz Mountain 4.29 Friendliness of dining/restaurant personnel 4.22 Important attributes Types of amenities in the rooms or cabins 4.14 Friendliness of reservation personnel 4.10 Friendliness of office personnel 4.08 Lesser attributes Facilities are readily ADA accessible 3.98 Friendliness of housekeeping personnel 3.85 Quality of the cabins 3.79 Convenience of and driving access to Quartz Mountain 3.69 Outdoor activities in general 3.68 Attributes approaching unimportance Water level in the lake 3.39 Water-based recreation opportunities 3.14 11

Findings: Motivations Preference Motivations Means Critical travel motivations Fun and enjoyment 4.26 Important travel motivations Passive recreation 4.18 Being with family members 4.13 Lesser travel motivations Visiting familiar places/return visit to Quartz Mountain 3.89 Active recreation (i.e. hiking, biking, climbing) 3.83 Visiting friends and relatives 3.72 Visiting new places 3.68 Having time by myself 3.59 Romance or a romantic setting 3.51 Travel motivations approaching unimportance The art in the buildings and park 3.31 Taking a carefully and completely planned trip 3.29 12

Findings: Satisfaction Satisfcation levels 3% 6% Very dissatisfied 38% 9% Dissatisfied Neutral 44% Satisfied Very satisfied 13

Findings: Willingness to Recommend Willigness to recommend 1% 4% 8% 45% Definitely would not recommend Would not recommend Neutral 42% Would recommend Definitely would recommend 14

Findings: Price Acceptance Price Acceptance 3% 8% Definitely not worth the price Not worth the price 36% 15% Neutral Worth the price 39% Definitely worth the price 15

Recommendations Value and integrity of property Importance of property as draw for guests Safety, accessibility, aesthetics, sustained operations Playgroups: ADA requirements, particularly safety surfaces 16

Implications Conduct internal and external research Identify visitor s profile and visit characteristics Identify competitive market Develop infrastructure, facilities, services and additional features that increase visitors expenditure and generate revenue. 17

Thank You!