City of Ithaca Public Engagement Technical Report PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT TECHNICAL REPORT SYNTHESIS 1.1 STAKEHOLDER FOCUS GROUPS AND INTERVIEWS

Similar documents
Parks, Recreation, Trails and Open Space Master Plan Survey Results. October 2018

TOWN OF CANANDAIGUA PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN PUBLIC OPINION QUESTIONNAIRE

The City of Durango Community Interest and Opinion Survey Executive Summary

Crookston Parks & Recreation Survey (Night To Unite 2016)

Irish Fair of Minnesota: 2017 Attendee Profile

Parks and Recreation Master Plan

New Haven-Adams Twp Parks & Recreation Dept Citizen Survey

The Future of the Road to Revolutions. A Battle Road Scenic Byway Public Forum November 9, 2010

2017 Citizen Satisfaction Survey

2013 Business & Legislative Session Visitor Satisfaction Survey Results

TURTLE SURVIVAL ALLIANCE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Tell City and Perry County Parks & Recreation 2017 Survey Results and Public Input Session

Community Advisory Committee Meeting #3 April 21, 2015

6/28/11 TELEPHONE (n=400, RDD) AND ON-LINE (n=6,294) SURVEY RESULTS

2014 STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE OUTDOOR RECREATION PLAN

WEST JORDAN PARKS, RECREATION AND TRAILS MASTER PLAN Advisory Committee Meeting #2

Nelson/Tasman Recreation Cross Boundary Partnerships. Presented by Richard Kempthorne Mayor Tasman District

PARKS & RECREATION Public Input Planning Session. June 9, 2014

Schachtner Street. Village Park Somerset, Wisconsin

Chapter 6. Action Program. Heart of the Lakes Area Recreation Plan

BRYAN REGIONAL PARK. Presented by: Burditt Consultants November 13, 2018

Resort Municipality Initiative Annual Report 2015

Public Park System. Township of Derry. Providing natural open space for the recreational use of our residents and guests.

Sevierville, TN. Technical Appendices

Florida State Park Visitors Park Visiting Party Size

City of Washington & East Washington Borough Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan October Public Open Houses Summary

T H E VILLAGE OF P h i l m o n t, N Y

Cedar Rapids Area Convention and Visitors Bureau Visitor Study

Word Count: 3,565 Number of Tables: 4 Number of Figures: 6 Number of Photographs: 0. Word Limit: 7,500 Tables/Figures Word Count = 2,250

1.0 BACKGROUND NEW VETERANS CHARTER EVALUATION OBJECTIVES STUDY APPROACH EVALUATION LIMITATIONS... 7

Summary of Small Group Discussion Notes

AAPA 2017 COMMUNICATION AWARDS CATEGORY: OVERALL CAMPAIGN

Outdoor Adventures Department of Recreational Sports Spring 2017

Pier Enhancements April 6, 2017

10/25/2013. What is the SCORP?! 2013 Local Government Survey 2013 Statewide Public Survey Advisory Group Priority Areas Your Suggestions!

Parks & Recreation Master Plan Steering Committee Meeting to be held at City of Penticton, Committee Room A 171 Main Street, Penticton, BC

Lake Myra County Park. Wake County, North Carolina Community Forum #2 June 12, 2008

MVT Neighborhood Perception Survey Summary Results Covering Calendar Year 2017

St. John s Park Redevelopment Master Plan Public Engagement Report

Update of the Indianapolis-Marion County Park, Recreation & Open Space Plan

Gunnison Valley Air Service Strategic Plan. Strategic Priority #1: Creating a Collaborative Public-Private Partnership

Crown Corporation BUSINESS PLANS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR Trade Centre Limited. Table of Contents. Business Plan

Webber Park Master Plan Charrette Summary

Unincorporated Quartz Hill -Lancaster- Palmdale STUDY AREA PROFILE

5th Level Subagency Report. OSD, Agencies and Activities DIRECTOR CLINICAL SPT

- Welcome. - Project Next Steps. - Intros. - Public Comment Time. - Guiding Principles Revisited. - Balance in the Service Area

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Drone Advisory Committee (DAC) Role Name or Title Organization. Director, UAS Integration Office. Director, UAS Integration Office

WINTER SHELTER IN EAST KING COUNTY

Welcome to the future of Terwillegar Park a Unique Natural Park

City of Galion Park Satisfaction Survey Results

Project Description. Connect Cascade Locks: A Recreational Trails Plan for Economic Development. Introduction

Chapter 1 Introduction

Parks Master Plan. Interim Presentation: Long Range Vision August 3, 2016

Slum Situation Analysis

M E S T I Z O C U R T I S P A R K

JOSLIN FIELD, MAGIC VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT DECEMBER 2012

2017 Citizen's Survey

4MRV Parks Master Plan: Site Analysis

MEDIUM SIZE STADIUM STRATEGY

Silver Lake Park An Environmental Jewel for the Citizens of Prince William County

City of LA Valley Glen - North Sherman Oaks STUDY AREA PROFILE

1987 SUMMER USE SURVEY OF MINNESOTA STATE PARK VISITORS

Dover Park Master Plan. Community Design Event Tuesday, May 22, 5 7 pm

SPLASH PAD EVALUATION SUMMARY REPORT January 2016

SUMMER CAMP Leaders in Training Program

Tamanend Park Day FREE FAMILY EVENT! Saturday, September 9, :00 AM - 2:00 PM. Down on the Farm TAMDAY2017. Schedule of Events

Salt Lake Downtown Alliance. June 2018

Chapter eight. Parks and Recreation. Introduction. Crystal Lake Park District

KNOWLEDGE nowparks PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS: SMALL TOWNS DELIVERING BIG RESULTS

Implementation Strategy for the Lethbridge Destination Management Organization (LDMO)

A summary report on what the community told us

Santa Barbara County Association of Governments 2002 COMMUTE PROFILE

COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT (Lisa Belsanti, Director) (Joshua Schare, Public Information Officer)

Colorado Springs & Pikes Peak Region Destination Master Plan

FY20 BUDGET PRESENTATION

Special Report on Camping 2010

GOLD COAST CONVENTION AND EXHIBITION CENTRE NOVEMBER 2017 PARTNERSHIP PROSPECTUS

CITY OF MANVEL Parks & Recreation Master Plan Community Meeting Summary

Lincoln County ORP Survey Response Summary

Winnebago County Community Park

NORTHWEST SECTION CONTENTS: CLEVELAND PARK FOLWELL PARK RYAN LAKE PARK VICTORY PRAIRIE DOG PARK VICTORY PARK

DUNBAR & ASSOCIATES: ARNPRIOR RECREATION MASTER PLAN. Draft Community Workshop Meeting: June 26, 2014 Nick Smith Centre

Dundee Community Survey. Answered: 182 Skipped: % % 57. Somewhat Agree 6.59% % % 2. No Opinion TOTAL 182.

Sport Capital Improvement Plan. Paul Borci Manager, Campus Planning Property & Campus Services

Tahoe Donner Association Public Scoping Meeting DUDEK

PUHOI TO PAKIRI VISITOR SURVEY UPDATE. ( Simon Milne New Zealand Tourism Research Institute

CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PARKS, TRAILS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY, OCTOBER 20, 2015 ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL

SUMMER CAMP BEST ADVENTURES EVER! YMCA CAMP ZEHNDER. Imagine, Discover and Experience Your

Tourism Impacts and Second Home Development in Coastal Counties: A Sustainable Approach

The packet is available on-line by going to choosing the Monthly Calendar, and clicking on Monday, March 16, 2015.

2009 Muskoka Airport Economic Impact Study

Camp Jack Hazard PO Box 3290, Modesto, CA (209) 965-7CJH

Sunningdale Parish Council Residents' Survey November 2017

Nantucket Memorial Airport Master Plan Update

Quarterly Report to the Minister for Planning

TOURISM PLAN

Strategic Plan Mt Eden Village Inc T: W: mounteden.co.nz E:

Villages at Buffalo Run East

SAXON HARBOR REDEVELOPMENT SURVEY

Business Item No

Transcription:

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT TECHNICAL REPORT 1.1 STAKEHOLDER FOCUS GROUPS AND INTERVIEWS The consultant team conducted stakeholder focus groups and interviews over a two-day period in early November 2016. Stakeholder focus groups and interviews provide a foundation for identifying system issues and key themes along with understanding question topics that would be beneficial for the statistically-valid community survey. The consultant team developed a facilitation guide that included a series of questions that spurred conversation. Follow up questions were asked as appropriate. Invited stakeholders included: Cascadilla Boat Club Cass Park Sports Groups (i.e., baseball, softball, soccer, hockey, ultimate Frisbee) Cayuga Bird Club City of Ithaca Administration Cornell Cooperative Extension Department of Public Works Staff Friends of Ithaca Youth Bureau (IYB) Friends of Newman Golf Course Friends of Stewart Park Ithaca Children s Garden IYB Advisory Board IYB and Cass Park Staff New Roots Charter School Parks Commission Town of Ithaca Administration Tompkins County Administration Tompkins County Veterans Wharton Studio Museum 1.1.1 SYNTHESIS After speaking with many stakeholders and interest groups, it is clear that there is a lot of ownership for the City of Ithaca park system. There are many organizations that collaborate to make the park system what it is today. It will be important for the parks and recreation master plan to identify all the existing and potential partnerships/collaborations and provide guidance as to a structure that will streamline the park system s oversight. As evidenced by on-site observations and personal communication, the Ithaca park system provides water access to residents that otherwise would be non-existent. Two parks in particular, Cass Park and Stewart Park, are community icons and should be treated as signature parks. With a diverse mix of parks, it will be important to develop a strategy moving forward that will address underutilized spaces and the equitable distribution of community amenities. Additionally, funding the system will require out-of-the-box thinking as there are large tax exempt entities within City limits that do not contribute to funding the system. In terms of ongoing operations and maintenance and capital expenditures, it will be important to consider alternative approaches to make up for the general fund shortage other communities can rely on. The following key takeaways emerged from the various interest groups spoken to during the consultant visit. 1.1.2 KEY TAKEAWAYS CITY OF ITHACA PARK SYSTEM STRENGTHS 1) Lakefront park access 2) Trail system and connectivity 3) Dedicated staff 4) Parks are well used DESIRED MASTER PLAN KEY OUTCOMES 5) System funding and operations and maintenance planning 6) Vision for park system as a whole including the lakefront parks 1

7) Updated amenities and facility space 8) Flexible and functional organizational structure and governance 9) A path forward for addressing underutilized park sites DESIRED PARK SYSTEM CHANGES 10) Continue to address ADA concerns throughout system 11) A more formalized parks department 12) Improved facility rental process 13) Safety and playability issues addressed on sports fields 14) Formalized (written) partnership agreements and simplify all collaborations MISSING RECREATION SERVICES OR AMENITIES 15) Nature swimming location 16) Public restrooms downtown 17) Trash receptacles and recycle bins 18) More sports fields ASSESSING THE CITY S ABILITY TO MARKET ITS SERVICES 19) The parks system s marketing is underutilized 20) A shared vision for all the parks among the various Friends Groups and partners needs to be developed and articulated to the public FUNDING THE SYSTEM 21) Look into dedicated funding sources such as taxes and/or transfers 22) Leverage the Friends Groups and partnership organizations for fundraising 23) Demonstrate the case for funding the system to untapped entities such as the local universities 24) Increased private-public partnerships ORGANIZATIONS TO CONSIDER PARTNERSHIPS WITH 25) Local schools (Ithaca City School System, Charter Schools, etc.) 26) Cornell University and Ithaca College 27) Local sports groups ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 28) Consider blue ways and blue trails for future waterfront access 29) Enhance food availability in parks 30) Ensure funding and revenue strategies component of Master Plan provides guidance 31) Ensure input is received from those out of City limits as well 1.2 FIRST PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT The City of Ithaca hosted a Party for the Parks event in January 2017. One event was held at GIAC during the week and the other was held at Cass Park inside the skating rink (with a special appearance from the Mayor). Both events were activity-based and included prioritizing communication methods, facilities, and programs with dots; drawing posters so participants (especially kids) could draw what they like to see in parks; comment cards; and a brief questionnaire/survey. 2

3 City of Ithaca

1.2.1 COMMUNICATION METHOD PRIORITIES The top five preferred communication methods include (including the number of votes): 1. Facebook (37) 2. Email (20) 3. From Friends and Neighbors (14) 4. City of Ithaca Website (11) 5. At Events (10) 1.2.2 RECREATION FACILITY PRIORITIES The top five preferred communication methods include (including the number of votes): 1. Indoor basketball/volleyball courts (32) 2. Outdoor natural swimming areas (16) 3. Outdoor swimming pools/water parks (12) 4. Indoor swimming pool/leisure pool (11) 5. Splash pad (11) 1.2.3 RECREATION PROGRAM PRIORITIES The top five preferred communication methods include (including the number of votes): 1. Youth sports programs (16) 2. Special events (14) 3. Programs for teens (13) 4. Youth summer camp programs (12) 5. Before and after school programs (11) 6. Nature programs/environmental education (11) 1.2.4 MURAL DRAWINGS Participants were asked to draw what they would like to see in the parks on large sheets of paper. The following activities/amenities were depicted: Archery Basketball Cass Community dances Dragon boats Family activities Flowers Historical tours Movable chairs and tables Organized games Ping pong tables Pickleball Playgrounds Programs for all ages Safe walking & biking routes Street fairs Tetherball Trails Tree identification Tree houses Walking and hiking 4

5 City of Ithaca

1.2.5 QUESTIONNAIRE/SURVEY Participants were also able to complete a short questionnaire/survey to provide additional feedback. MOST IMPORTANT PARK OR FACILITY FEATURE FOR ITHACA 1. Outdoor natural swimming areas 2. Greenspace and natural areas 3. Playgrounds MOST IMPORTANT PROGRAMS OR SERVICES FOR ITHACA 1. Before and after school programs 2. Programs for teens 3. Youth learn to swim programs 1.3 SECOND PUBLIC FORUM On July 26, 2017 the City of Ithaca held a second public forum at the Tompkins County Public Library. The forum served as a penultimate event before creating the initial Master Plan draft document. The consultant team walked through a presentation that outlined the overall Master Plan direction along with the appropriate supporting research. During and after the presentation, the public was invited to ask questions and have a dialogue with the consultant team and staff. The following comments were captured during the public forum: 1) The master plan should address the carry-in, carry-out policy 2) What is a transfer as it applies to transfer those parks back to the appropriate body 3) Need to address recreation facilities and amenities for the future (such as pools) 4) The plan should address the amenities that are not available year round 5) It may be beneficial to start looking at an access-based level of service analysis 6) There should be recommendations for making it easier to get to Cass and Stewart parks 7) Need an overall goal for community gardens under land use 8) Establish safe routes to parks similar to safe routes to school efforts 9) Trails are a treasure and it means a lot to the quality of life 10) We would like to see Pickleball added to Cass Park 11) We need to prioritize outdoor adventure programs like paddle boarding and kayaking 12) We need to have more access to the water front 13) We need to articulate how the waterfront parks are a larger draw from the surrounding area 14) A management plan is needed for the regional parks 15) Funding for the future needs to be addressed in this plan 16) How do we keep up with the increasing demand because we can t keep up with the need? 17) Equity is an issue as it applies to access and how much the City is supporting County residents 1.4 PUBLIC FORUM RESULTS INTEGRATION The first public forum was used to gather information that helped support the statistically-valid community survey development that occurred during late winter/early spring 2017. Additionally, the second public forum notes were 6

utilized to ground-truth the overall direction of the Master Plan while also collecting any additional comments that could influence strategic recommendations for the final plan document. 1.5 FINAL PUBLIC PRESENTATION The final plan was presented at a public Common Council meeting on November 8, 2017. 1.6 ONLINE SURVEY RESULTS As part of the community input process, PROS Consulting conducted an on-line survey (powered by SurveyMonkey) for a better understanding of the needs, preferences, and satisfaction levels of Ithaca s community concerning parks, recreation facilities and amenities. The survey was available for a month from February 9th through March 9th and received a total of 889 responses. 1.6.1 COMMUNITY SURVEY RESULTS Seventy-five percent (75%) of respondents have two to four people living in their household. Twelve percent (12%) are in a single household and 13% have 5 or more people living in their household. Including yourself, how many people live in your household? 27% 21% 27% 12% 10% 2% 1% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7+ 7

Majority of respondents (90%) use City/Town/County public facilities for indoor and outdoor recreation activities followed by college/university facilities (58%), Ithaca Children s Garden (52%), and school district facilities (52%). Other written in responses included state parks, The Rink, Ithaca Youth Bureau, Ithaca Swim Club, Primitive Pursuits, IYHA, Waza and Fingers Lake Land Trust. Tompkins County has many providers of park and recreation services. From the following list of park and recreation providers in the area, please SELECT ALL that you or members of your household have used for indoor and outdoor recreation activities during City/Town/County Public Facilities 90% College/University Facilities 58% Ithaca Children's Garden School District Facilities 52% 52% Private Fitness Clubs/Studios YMCA of Ithaca & Tompkins County 38% 42% Other (please specify) 19% Homeowners Association/Apt. Complex 3% 8

Eighty-seven percent (87%) of respondents visit Stewart Park fields, pavilions and playground the most followed by Ithaca Famers Marker (85%), and Cass Park fields, pavilions and playgrounds (77%). The least visited recreational facilities by respondents in the past year were Alex Haley Pool (11%), Newman Golf Course (11%) and Southside Community Center (13%). From the following list, please SELECT ALL of the City of Ithaca recreational facilities that you and members of your household have visited during the past 12 months. Stewart Park Fields, Pavilions, Playgrounds Ithaca Farmers Market Cass Park Fields, Pavilions, Playgrounds Cass Park Skating Rink Ithaca Youth Bureau (in Stewart Park) Cass Park Swimming Pool Greater Ithaca Activities Center (GIAC) Southside Community Center Newman Golf Course Alex Haley Pool 19% 13% 11% 11% 45% 37% 30% 87% 85% 77% Eighty-two percent (82%) of respondents rated the overall quality of City of Ithaca s recreation facilities as either excellent or good. Sixteen percent (16%) rated the quality as fair and only 2% rated the overall quality of Ithaca s recreation facilities as poor. How would you rate the overall quality of all of the City of Ithaca recreation facilities you have visited? 2% 16% 64% 18% Excellent Good Fair Poor 9

Eighty-nine percent (89%) of respondents rated the overall quality of City of Ithaca s recreation program and services as either excellent or good. Ten percent (10%) rated the quality as fair and only 1% rated the quality of programs and services as poor. How would you rate the overall quality of all the City of Ithaca recreation programs and services you have participated in? 1% 64% 10% 25% Excellent Good Fair Poor 10

Top five most visited City and Town parks and trails by respondents are Cass Park (88%), Stewart Park (86%), Cayuga Waterfront Trail (74%), Ithaca Falls Natural Area (65%), and DeWitt Park (65%). Least used parks and trails by respondents were Troy Park (3%), Tudor Park (3%), Salem Park (3%), Grandview Park (2%), and Maplewood Park (2%). From the following list of both City of Ithaca and Town of Ithaca parks and trails, please SELECT ALL that you and members of your household have visited during the past 12 months. Cass Park 88% Stewart Park 86% Cayuga Waterfront Trail 74% Ithaca Falls Natural Area 65% DeWitt Park 65% South Hill Recreation Way Trail 47% East Ithaca Recreation Way Trail 37% East Shore Park 29% Northeast Ithaca Recreation Way Trail 17% Washington Park 16% Thompson Park 15% Titus Flats/Wood Street Park/Ithaca Skate Park 14% Forest Home Park 11% Bryant Park 11% Auburn Park 9% Titus Triangle 8% Eastern Heights Park 8% Conley Park 8% Vincenzo Lacovelli Park 7% Strawberry Fields 7% Conway Park 6% Dryden Park 6% MacDaniels Park 5% Baker Park 5% Tutelo Park 5% Columbia Street Park 4% Tareyton Park 4% Hillview Park 4% Troy Park 3% Tudor Park 3% Salem Park 3% Grandview Park 2% Maplewood Park 2% 11

Eighty-nine percent (89%) of respondents rated City and Town parks and trails in excellent or good condition. Ten percent (10%) rated the condition is fair and 1% in poor condition. How would you rate the overall condition of all the parks and trails you visited in Question #7? 1% 10% 66% 23% Excellent Good Fair Poor Respondents were asked to select their top two parks or trails that were in the best condition. The following chart shows the top five parks or trails for 1 st and 2 nd choices in the best condition selected by respondents. Cayuga Waterfront Trail received the most votes with 253 followed by Cass Park with 103 votes for 1 st choice. Of the parks and trails you selected in Question #7, which two are in the BEST condition? 1st Choice Name Number of Responses Cayuga Waterfront Trail 253 Cass Park 103 Stewart Park 47 Ithaca Falls Natural Area 45 South Hill Recreation Way Trail 36 2nd Choice Cass Park 93 Stewart Park 90 Cayuga Waterfront Trail 86 South Hill Recreation Way Trail 73 Ithaca Falls Natural Area 65 12

Respondents were asked to select their top two parks or trails that were in the worst condition. The following chart shows the top five parks or trails for 1 st and 2 nd choices in the worst condition selected by respondents. Stewart Park received the most votes with 161 followed by Cass Park with 83 votes for 1 st choice. Of the parks and trails you selected in Question #7, which two are in the WORST condition? Name Number of Responses 1st Choice Stewart Park 161 Cass Park 83 Dewitt Park 80 Ithaca Fall Natural Area 50 Columbia Street Park 13 Titus Flats/Wood Street Park/Ithaca Skate Park 13 Cayuga Waterfront Trail 13 2nd Choice Stewart Park 93 Dewitt Park 90 Cass Park 86 Ithaca Fall Natural Area 73 Washington Park 65 13

Majority of respondents learn about City of Ithaca parks, facilities, special events and activities from friends and neighbors (74%). Thirty-nine percent (39%) of respondents use the Ithaca Youth Bureau website for their means of communication followed by social media with 38% of respondents. Least effective way of communication with respondents was conversations with staff (10%), other (12%), and IPlayBook (14%). Other comments written in by respondents included: Lived and grew up in Ithaca /living in Ithaca/Ithaca native Ithaca Visitor Center Discovering on their own/exploring YMCA brochures Ithaca Family Fun Friends of Stewart Park emails Cornell Parents List Radio Cayuga Trail club/ithacatrails.org From the following list, please SELECT ALL the ways that your household has learned about City of Ithaca parks, facilities, special events, and activities during the past 12 months. From friends and neighbors Ithaca Youth Bureau website (IYBREC.com) Social media City of Ithaca website (cityofithaca.org) Email newsletters/listservs Newspaper School fliers/newsletters Fliers/signs at parks and facilities Other websites iplaybook (mobile app) Other (please specify) Conversations with staff 12% 10% 14% 39% 38% 35% 34% 29% 28% 25% 21% 74% 14

Top reasons that prevent respondents having using parks, recreation facilities, or events provided by the City of Ithaca more often are I don t know what is offered (33%), Too far from our residence (32%), and Other (28%). Other comments written in by respondents included: Lack of Time/Too busy Website is hard to navigate Safety at parks/drug activity at parks Parks are not dog friendly Hours facility is open Goose poop/parks are not well maintained Please SELECT ALL the reasons that prevent you or other members of your household from using parks, recreation facilities, or events provided by the City of Ithaca more often. I do not know what is offered Too far from our residence Other (please specify) Facilities are not well maintained I do not know locations of facilities Facilities lack the right equipment Program or facility not offered Fees are too high Lack of parking by facilities and parks Use facilities in other communities Lack of quality programs Security is insufficient Use services of other agencies Not accessible for people with disabilities Facility operating house not convenient Poor customer service by staff 6% 6% 3% 2% 2% 15% 13% 11% 10% 9% 9% 24% 22% 28% 33% 32% 15

Top potential sources of revenue receiving the most support are: Partner with nonprofits and private entities to financially support park maintenance and recreation programs. (56%) The City of Ithaca, Town of Ithaca, and Tompkins County should jointly contribute public funding (i.e., tax dollars) to focus dollars on the greatest park and recreation needs in Greater Ithaca. (55%) Least supported potential sources of revenue are: Sell or lease a few small, under-utilized parks to provide money to focus on more popular parks and programs. (48%) Increase existing admission fees for facilities like the Cass Park Skating Rink and Swimming Pool. (47%) The City of Ithaca s parks and facilities are aging and will require more attention and dollars to keep them safe and appealing. However, parks are just one of many priorities to budget for. The following are potential sources of funding to help improve the park system and recreation programs in the City of Ithaca and surrounding communities. Please indicate how supportive you are of each potential source of revenue. Potential Sources of Revenue Increase existing admission fees for facilities like the Cass Park Skating Rink and Swimming Pool. Increase existing fees for using shelters, athletic fields, or other facilities. The City of Ithaca, Town of Ithaca, and Tompkins County should jointly contribute public funding (i.e., tax dollars) to focus dollars on the greatest park and recreation needs in Greater Ithaca. Partner with nonprofits and private entities to financially support park maintenance and recreation programs. Sell or lease a few small, under-utilized parks to provide money to focus on more popular parks and programs. Very Supportive Somewhat Supportive Not Supportive Not Sure 8% 38% 47% 8% 16% 51% 23% 10% 55% 35% 5% 5% 56% 34% 5% 6% 13% 24% 48% 15% 16

The top most supported potential sources of revenues for 1 st Choice are: The City of Ithaca, Town of Ithaca, and Tompkins County should jointly contribute public funding (i.e., tax dollars) to focus dollars on the greatest park and recreation needs in Greater Ithaca (253) Partner with nonprofits and private entities to financially support park maintenance and recreation programs (103) These potential sources of revenue were the top selections for 2 nd choice as well. Which TWO of the potential sources of revenues listed in Question #13 would you MOST SUPPORT? Number of Name Responses 1st Choice The City of Ithaca, Town of Ithaca, and Tompkins County should jointly contribute public funding 253 (i.e., tax dollars) to focus dollars on the greatest park and recreation needs in Greater Ithaca. Partner with nonprofits and private entities to financially support park maintenance and 103 recreation programs. Increase existing fees for using shelters, athletic 47 fields, or other facilities. Sell or lease a few small, under-utilized parks to provide money to focus on more popular parks 45 and programs. Increase existing admission fees for facilities like 36 the Cass Park Skating Rink and Swimming Pool. 2nd Choice Partner with nonprofits and private entities to financially support park maintenance and 93 recreation programs. The City of Ithaca, Town of Ithaca, and Tompkins County should jointly contribute public funding 90 (i.e., tax dollars) to focus dollars on the greatest park and recreation needs in Greater Ithaca. Increase existing fees for using shelters, athletic 86 fields, or other facilities. Sell or lease a few small, under-utilized parks to provide money to focus on more popular parks 73 and programs. Increase existing admission fees for facilities like 65 the Cass Park Skating Rink and Swimming Pool. 17

Eighty-eight percent (88%) of respondents are either very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with the overall value they receive from the City of Ithaca parks and trails. Seven percent (7%) were neutral, 1% did not know, and 4% were somewhat or very dissatisfied. Please rate your level of satisfaction with the overall value that your household receives from City of Ithaca parks and trails. 1% 1% 7% 3% Very Satisfied 48% Somewhat Satisfied Neutral Somewhat Dissatisfied 40% Very Dissatisfied Don't Know 18

Respondents were asked to write one sentence that describes what they believe should be the TOP PRIORITY for parks and recreation within the City of Ithaca. The following word cloud represents the top words and/or phrases that were mentioned the most (A word cloud is an image composed of words, in which the size of each word indicates its frequency or importance). All responses can be found in the Appendix. 19

1.6.2 DEMOGRAPHICS Respondents were asked to write their age. There was 706 written in responses. The average age of respondents is 46. Sixty-eight percent (68%) of respondents are female and 30% are male. One percent (1%) are non-binary/third gender and 1% prefer to self-describe. 1% 1% What is your gender? 30% Female Male Non-binary/third gender 68% Prefer to self-describe: Five percent (5%) of respondents are of Hispanic or Latin ancestry. Are you of Hispanic or Latin ancestry? 5% Yes No 95% 20

Ninety-three percent (93%) of respondents are White/Caucasian. 93% Which of the following best describes your race/ethnicity?(select all that apply). 3% 0% 2% 2% 3% White/Caucasian Asian Pacific Islander African American/Black Native American/American Indian Other (please specify) Forty-four percent (44%) of respondents are from the City of Ithaca, 27% from the Town of Ithaca, 24% Tompkins County and 5% are from outside of Tompkins County. Which of the following best describes the location of your primary residence? 44% 27% 24% 5% City of Ithaca Town of Ithaca Tompkins County, but not in the City or Town of Ithaca Outside of Tompkins County 21