January 11, 212 Sewer Service Charge The Los Angeles City Council City Clerk 2 North Spring Street, Roo 395 Los Angeles, CA 912 "Proposed Sewer Service Charge" To who it ay concern: This letter is to PROTEST the proposed sewer service charge increase. I do not agree nor support the rate increases proposed. APN 62222 723 W. 76th Street Los Angeles, CA 944 I : :A
January 11, 212 Sewer Service Charge The Los Angeles City Council City Clerk 2 North Spring Street, Roo 395 Los Angeles, CA 912 "Proposed Sewer Service Charge 11 To who it ay concern: This letter is to PROTEST the proposed sewer service charge increase. I do not agree nor support the rate increases proposed....... -..!./.., Thc.you,. /./ I.. t:.:{/1 '----"ike.e;;;eno C- ---,..., APN 5186627 Giovanni Rios 3268 E. 4th Street Los Angeles, CA 963 = (_ ::::a ;;;;e: N U1 r : :3:: ;A;.. C) ---1 C?:u r fti r-; ::::...:: - CIJ j=-::o oc "ll (")"
January 11, 212 Sewer Service Charge The Los Angeles City Council City Clerk \ G- \l 2 North Spring Street, Roo 395 Los Angeles, CA 9 12 ''Proposed Sewer Service Charge 11 To who it ay concern: This letter is to PROTEST the proposed sewer service charge increase. I do not agree nor support the rate increases proposed. APN 5181131 c,_ > z. 2626 E. 1st Street N Los Angeles, CA 933 -+t ;J u T c =< =!'>.,;> UJ r- ;:'!> : :X 7:.:: Vi! &"" O:n <: u5 :, I'. QC_ 'j ll C.
January 11,212 Sewer Service Charge The Los Angeles City Council City Clerk 2 North Spring Street, Roo 395 Los Angeles, CA 912 nproposed Sewer Service Charge 11 To who it ay concern: This letter is to PROTEST the proposed sewer service charge increase. I do not agree nor support the rate increases proposed. Thanlr J..\fPl;.,.- - "---- ---)._. 7/ if----- APN 51861531 69 S. Lorena Street Los Angeles, CA 923 -!--.;) c... >,... z N Cfl > --,1 \,.. ::JJ :1:: \... ) --I ()...,..., '"' :.-. :: '- '; ;..; =: ci5:':' I. : CJr,: -rj ll
.;;.;: Ser Service Charge The Los Angeles City Council City Clerk 2 North Spring Street, Roo 395 Los Angeles, CA 912 11 Proposed Sewer Service Charge 11 To who it ay concern: This letter is to PROTEST the proposed sewer service charge increase. I do not agree nor support the rate increases proposed. Danny Bautista 3432 Aethyst Street Los Angeles, CA 932 :J.,., -t) c --1 - a:! ::<!... itl : :A = """" -- c_ > z: N c.n ::r:,s.. :!!: 1...r::"" :::::j -,: r--- _..._,),,, rr :::: ) ::; u3f:""i: CiC -T'! -n r:n
.,;;-------- Sewer Service Charge The Los Angeles City Council City Clerk 2 North Spring Street, Roo 395 Los Angeles, CA 912 ''Proposed Sewer Service Charge 11 To who it ay concern: This letter is to PROTEST the proposed sewer service charge increase. I do not agree nor support the rate increases proposed. r I APN 51741942 c... :t;loo 341 S. State Street :< : Los Angeles, CA 933 - C;;) N Ul,.-.,I J::;io :: X ;;:;:: ' \9.r:"' 11: (") ::::2 r- -, _... --.. r.' ::n =: ;.. ---; cj) ;:'(;, ClC. - q jf
CITY CLERK 2 NO SPRING ST ROOM395 LOS ANGELES CA 912 PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE CHARGE 2293424 16439 WESTFALL PL ENCINO CA 91436 r I \ I J : ;::'. \ -I,. e:> (,_ ;:p. ::z. =2 N c.j1 r rtl "'"'lj : ::Ji:: 7' <a -J () ::::::j o-r -u rnr.! i (J) ;:::c. >' > oc 1-l,, (} rn I STRONGLY OBJECT TO ANY INCREASE IN THE SEWER CHARGE AS PROPOSED. THE CHARGE NOW IS TOO HIGH. RESPECTFULLYSUBNITTTED MELVIN C APPELL 16439 WESTFALL PL ENCINO CA 91436
---,, CITY CLERK 2 NO SPRING ST ROOM395 LOS ANGELES CA 912 PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE CHARGE APN 2293424 65 SO DETROIT LOS ANGELES CA 936 I STRONGLY OBJECT TO ANY INCREASE IN THE SEWER CHARGE AS PROPOSED. THE Cl-IARGE NOW IS TOO HIGH. RESPECTFULLYSUBNUTTED 11EL VIN C APPELL 16439 WESTFALL PL ENCINO CA 91436
,o=="c CITY CLERK 2 NO SPRING ST ROOM395 LOS ANGELES CA 912 PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE CHARGE 621 SO DUNSMUIR AVE LOS ANGELES CA 936 r {.,.,..I l,.1 '::j ''I = -t-...;> :> _,? z '-. f'v U1,- -o :D :X 7' w -.11 =i OT' I..J il,-' b.: u5[=; ', CJC..: -n -n c5 I STRONGLY OBJECT TO ANY INCREASE IN THE SEWER CHARGE AS PROPOSED. THE CHARGE NOW IS TOO HIGH. MIT TED
city CLERK 2 NO SPRING ST ROOM395 LOS ANGELES CA 912 PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE CHARGE APN 226292 734 HASKELL AVE VANNUYS CA 9146 ' I 2t c. "'.:i\ = (._ ;!;J --1 :;::: _.,. -'-.. N CJ1 I rn _o :;;:::: v :!'.:: Cf? -J =2 -:o fr; ---"""""lc::. 7; s. (j) rt;.,...-. '..._,.J c r-; -n () I STRONGLY OBJECT TO ANY INCREASE IN THE SEWER CHARGE AS PROPOSED. THE CHARGE NOW IS TOO HIGfi. RESPECTFULLYSUBTTED MELVIN C APPELL 16439 WESTFALL PL ENCINO CA 91436
------------ '"'U -\\-\ v '?- 1 8 r' 2-
I [ G - \ Lil PROTEST City Clerk 2 North Spring Street Roo 395 Los Angeles, CA 912. - Nae /V/!JY'!J c tal.j d vftht/j/}., P Add b 'lff#9-,. W-" />J 5! roperty ress: ;;( o', ::;; q City, Zip Code e: "ij. Assessor's Parcel No.?oP /;9Jfi;oozJ Re: Proposed Sewer Service Charge IJ c ==i r :JJ :A:,...;) 1:::1.- roo.:> c_ > :z: N c.n xao :X ('!} \D -I p ; fll f" -;-', :JJC.. _..,.. (""!... ::..: (/) ;=;-o-_ o :.. :. -r l -n C) rn Dear Sir / Mada: I a writing to oppose the increase in the Sewer Service Charge. These rate increases are in addition to the constant" rate increases I have received in the past few years nearly on an on-going basis. These increases in rates will alost double y bill. Please do not increase the sewer service charge. Sincerely,
( -t ql\( PROTEST anuary 12, 212 City Clerk 2 North Spring Street Roo 395 Los Angeles 1 CA 912 d.,.,. 4 ""! Re: Proposed Sewer Service Charge Dear Sir /Mada: I a writing to oppose the increase in the Sewer Service Charge. These rate increases are in addition to the constant" rate increases I have received in the past few years nearly on an on-going basis. These increases in rates will alost double y bill. Please do not increase the sewer service charge. Sincerely,.
J nu ry -::a } Offic f thg City Clerk : 1-f-. S )ric_. - - ;:3t:c,,.:.t- Hro! :J,', "OtJ L -. s An.:,:elc: s, CA 912 RE: f'l ')}r sod Sr-:;r t>crvic C!1: r : :c Aj'l i _ J:p.J:JP.P. -8/ to - \qlil PROTE T Oi,- :::: :A 3977 S. B uc: l n : Ave. LA. 937 Dt!a r: : C' 1.1.ncilrLb-...:rs: Rcs1cctfully y urs, lb.ri on Hillias
1/22/212 Los Angeles City Clerk 2 N Spring St, Roo 395 Los Angeles, CA 912 dawn hollingsworth 14352 killion st. sheran oaks, CA 9141 818-37-6411 (voice) dawnh@zuzink.co @zuzink PROTEST I (J - ( Gr'-il re: Proposed increases in Sewer Service Charge To Who It May Concern: I a writing to voice y opposition to the increases in the SSC Rates as proposed. I find the rate increases at 4.5% to 6.5% to be excessive copared to other annual cost increases. This is especially true in light of the recent econoic distress that any Los Angeles residents find theselves. Most of us have not had cost of living increases in the last three years. In fact, any of us have had to take pay cuts just to keep the jobs we do have. While there are signs that the econoy is iproving, this has yet to flow to the workers. The 21 consuer price index was 1.5% and the 29 CPI was 2.7%. The consuer price index for 211 was at 3%. Therefore, it would see that..., soething in the 2.7% to 3.2% would be ore reasonable. I can not l!!!derstarf!, the need for the City to propose increases in the range of 6.5%. This is re c_ than the consuer can absorb. 3 U1
Daniel Dunkin 1323 Crowley St. Arleta, Ca. 91331-4934 PROTEST Los Angeles City Clerk 2 North Spring Street Roo 34 City Hall Los Angeles, Ca. 912 January 21, 212 ' -l r ::JJ A Dear City Council, The proposed raise in LADWP sewer service charge is very exorbitant for those of us on fixed incoe. You are raising prices faster than we will ever have raises in our incoe to pay for this. You are living way beyond our eans. Ten years of raises every year, when did we as citizens, ever receive this kind of increase in wages or retireent. Never. You are in soe kind of ind set that what ever you want, the people can afford. These days, your very, wrong. There will be any other increases in the next 1 years. Gasoline, Food, Housing, other utilities besides just DWP. Everybody with the ability to charge for soething will be raising prices as the value of our oney shrinks every tie the governent goes to print ore oney. Have Mercy for God's sake on us with fixed incoe. Why should anyone work hard all their life only to be squeezed out in the end. Many failies now rely on retired parents to help the through. What's going to happen when you crush the retired parents too. Can you at least have soe kind of exeption or lesser fees for those who are retired? Daniel Dunkin (818) 453-3481