Morristown Municipal Airport Runway 5-23 Rehabilitation Environmental Assessment

Similar documents
Morristown Municipal Airport Runway 5-23 Rehabilitation Environmental Assessment

II. Purpose and Need. 2.1 Background

CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

Airport Master Plan for. Brown Field Municipal Airport PAC Meeting #3

Airport Master Plan for Montgomery-Gibbs Executive Airport PAC Meeting #3

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Chapter One PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Preliminary Findings of Proposed Alternative

MEETING MINUTES Page 1 of 5

ACTION TRANSMITTAL

Pierre Regional Airport Airport Master Plan. Kickoff Meeting April 7, 2017

Dallas Executive Airport

DRAFT MASTER PLAN UPDATE

Winona Runway Shift Project

Table of Contents. Overview Objectives Key Issues Process...1-3

CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED ACTION

Chapter 1 Introduction and Project Overview

Addendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6)

AGENCY SCOPING MEETING

STUDY OVERVIEW MASTER PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

CHAPTER 2.0 ALTERNATIVES

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

Source: Chippewa Valley Regional Airport ASOS, Period of Record

CATCODE ] CATCODE

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES INSPECTORATE. Title: CONSTRUCTION OF VISUAL AND INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

Chapter 1 Introduction and Project Overview

Safety, Infrastructure, and Tenant Improvement Project. Public Hearing Informational Brochure February 26, 2013

PROPOSED HORIZONTAL LAYOUT FILLET DESIGN FOR ENTRANCE/EXIT TAXIWAYS

Chapter 8.0 Implementation Plan

Chapter Seven COST ESTIMATES AND FUNDING A. GENERAL

I-3 DFW Extension Public Hearing. June 2, 2011

Appendix D Project Newsletters. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Santa Barbara Airport Master Plan. MEETING DATE: November 19, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 7D

Summary of Committee Discussion/Questions Metropolitan Transportation Services Senior Planner Russ Owen presented this item.

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

AERODROME LIGHTING SYSTEM

Chapter Six ALP Drawings. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update

Appendix D August 2001 RUNWAY SAFETY Revised March 2002 AREA DETERMINATION RUNWAY 17-35

CHAPTER 9 RUNWAYS AND AIRFIELD DEVELOPMENTS

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

AIRPORT MASTER PLAN. Newport State Airport. Draft. (Colonel Robert F. Wood Airpark) THE Louis Berger Group, INC. Prepared for: Prepared by:

MASTER PLAN CONCEPT 1 DRAFT

St. Paul Downtown Airport (STP)

Airlake Airport 2035 Long Term Comprehensive Plan (LTCP)

Prepared By: Mead & Hunt, Inc Port Lansing Road Lansing, MI 48906

TECHNICAL REPORT #7 Palm Beach International Airport Airport Layout Plan

Chippewa-Eau Claire Metropolitan Planning Area Long Range Transportation Plan

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport

Appendix F Cultural Resource Consultation

ORDINANCE NO. _2013-

Agenda: SASP SAC Meeting 3

Update on the Aspen/Pitkin County Airport Improvements

Lopez Island Airport Master Plan Update. Public Meeting June 15, 2017

CLASS SPECIFICATION 5/12/11 SENIOR AIRPORT ENGINEER, CODE 7257

General Aviation Master Plan Update

Table of Contents. List of Tables. Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport 2035 Master Plan Update

Office of Airports. Overview of the FAA s. Federal Aviation Administration ACI-NA/AAAE Airport Board & Commissioners Conference Indianapolis, IN

PUBLIC NOTICE ***************************** New Castle Airport. Intention to File a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Application

Airport Obstruction Standards

New Opportunities PUBLIC WORKSHOP. Venice Municipal. Bringing g the pieces together

Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport; Porter Airlines Proposal Review; Interim Results/Findings, Airbiz, 26 June 2013

Navigation - Runways. Chap 2, Nolan

What is an Airport Master Plan?

Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS

RIO VISTA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

Yakima Air Terminal/McAllister Field Airport Master Plan Update

Planning and Designing Airport Infrastructure to Support GPS and PBN Approach Development

BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS

CHAPTER FOUR AIRPORT ALTERNATIVES

ADVISORY CIRCULAR ON CALCULATION OF DECLARED DISTANCES

Chapter 4 Airport Facility Requirements

EXHIBIT A. LOMPOC AIRPORT MASTER PLAN SCOPE OF WORK AIP Project #

Lake Tahoe Airport Master Plan Public Meeting March 16, 2015

CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Input Efforts Online survey of tenants and users Focus group meetings with Tenants and users Agencies and stakeholders General Aviation Pilot

A Master Plan is one of the most important documents that can be prepared by an Airport.

DRAFT FINAL REPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN. Rifle Garfield County Airport Revised May 15, 2014

For Airport Environmental Services. Date Released: August 27, 2018 Deadline for Submission: 5:00pm, September 17, 2018

Kittitas County Airport Bowers Field Airport Master Plan Planning Advisory Committee Meeting #1 April 6, 2016

BELFAST MUNICIPAL AIRPORT OVERVIEW

1.1.3 Taxiways. Figure 1-15: Taxiway Data. DRAFT Inventory TYPICAL PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION LIGHTING TYPE LENGTH (FEET) WIDTH (FEET) LIGHTING CONDITION

Airport Master Plan. Brookings Regional Airport. Runway Runway 17-35

15 Precision Approach Path Indicator 33 None RSA 150 feet wide by 300 feet long 150 feet wide by 300 feet long

AIRPORT MASTER PLAN FOR. charles B. WHEELER DOWNTOWN AIRPORT KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

CHAPTER TWO THE PROPOSAL

JOSLIN FIELD, MAGIC VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT DECEMBER 2012

Chapter 4.0 Alternatives Analysis

AVIATION. MichiganReportCard.com 5

Airport 101 O Hare Noise Compatibility Commission July 19, 2018

2015 PURDUE ROAD SCHOOL March 11, 2015

October 2014 BELLINGHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN PRESENTATION

Updates to Procedures at St. John s International Airport

Airports and UAS: Integrating UAS into Airport Infrastructure and Planning

AERONAUTICAL SURVEYS & INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

TERMS OF REFERENCE (Revision 9) Special Committee (SC) 213 Enhanced Flight Vision Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems

Transcription:

1.0 INTRODCTION Morristown Municipal Airport (hereinafter referred to as MM or Airport ) is a busy general aviation reliever airport owned by the Town of Morristown and operated by DM AIRPORTS, LTD. (hereinafter referred to as DM ). DM is responsible for overseeing the daily activities of the Airport, as well as for providing all operational services (either directly or under contract), ensuring safety and security, and for the growth and development of the facility. This Environmental Assessment (EA) addresses the potential social, economic, and environmental consequences associated with the Runway 5-23 Rehabilitation Project being proposed at the Airport which is located in the Township of Hanover, Morris County, New Jersey. Based upon the findings in the previous studies, listed below, the proposed Runway 5-23 Rehabilitation Project is necessary to address existing infrastructure deficiencies throughout Runway 5-23. These studies include: Master Plan pdate (MP) (2013) Runway 5-23 Feasibility Study Phase I (August 2012) Runway 5-23 Feasibility Study Phase II (May 2013) Runway Safety Area Determination (June 2013) Pavement Condition Index Assessment (2013) Preliminary Engineering Report (June 2014) These previous work efforts were prepared in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) design criteria and safety standards based upon the existing and forecast demand at MM. FAA criteria were taken from FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5300-13A, Airport Design and Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace. The Runway 5-23 Rehabilitation Project is also intended to bring the Airport into compliance with these FAA criteria. This EA has been prepared in accordance with FAA guidelines and is in conformance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969; the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations set forth in 40 Code of Regulations (CFR) Part 1500 et seq. Guidance Regarding NEPA Regulations released in 1983; and FAA Orders 50.1E, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, and 5050.4B, and NEPA Implementing Instructions for Airport Actions. pon reviewing this EA, the FAA will determine if any of the environmental or socioeconomic impacts identified herein are significant and warrant further study. A Public Workshop to present the project and receive public input was held on January 15, 2014 prior to the commencement of the preparation of the Draft EA. The Workshop was advertised in a newspaper of local circulation and notice of the Workshop was mailed to the elected and appointed officials throughout the region. Further details and the presentation materials are enclosed in Appendix C. Introduction Page 1-1

State and local officials, as well as the public-at-large, were given the opportunity to review this document as per.s. Department of Transportation (SDOT) Order 4600.13. The Draft EA was available to the public, both electronically and hard copy, beginning on January 5, 2015. The Notice of Availability (NOA) was published in newspapers of local and regional circulation as well as mailed to the elected and appointed officials throughout the region (refer to Appendix C for a copy of the Affidavits of Printing and the NOA). The NOA also informed the public of the Public Workshop held on January 14, 2015. The workshop occurred within the 30-day comment period of the Draft EA. Two comments were received during the 30-day period and are enclosed and addressed in Appendix C. 1.1 BACKGROND The Airport is located approximately three miles east of downtown Morristown, fifteen miles northwest of Newark Liberty International Airport, and twenty-five miles west of New York City. The majority of the Airport property is situated in the Township of Hanover, with a small portion or the property located in the Borough of Florham Park. Refer to Figure 1-1 Location Map that depicts the Airport on a.s. Geological Survey Map and Figure 1-2 Aerial Location that depicts the Airport and its surroundings on a 2012 aerial photograph image. MM is used by general aviation users, corporate aircraft and helicopters in the NY/NJ Metropolitan area. MM also provides community services for medical facilities, as many hospitals in the region use the Airport to transport patients, medical samples and human organs for transplants to various locations throughout the.s. 1 The Airport was classified as one of 84 National General Aviation airports in the.s. in the FAA s May 2012 report entitled General Aviation Airports: A National Asset. National designates a category of general aviation airports that supports the national and state system by providing communities with access to national and international markets in multiple states and throughout the nited States. According to the FAA report, National airports account for 13% of total flying at studied general aviation airports. Based upon the total number of operations in 2012 (138,236), the Airport averages approximately 400 operations per day, with over 230 based aircraft, approximately 58 of which are jet aircraft. The Airport is equipped with a 5,998 foot long by 150 foot wide primary Runway 5-23 and a 3,997 foot long by 150 foot wide cross-wind Runway 13-31. Both runways are served by full length parallel taxiways. Runway 5-23 is equipped with a Category I Instrument Landing System (CAT I ILS) approaches to Runway 23 as well as Lateral Precision, ertically Guided (LP), global positioning system (GPS) and visual approaches. Runway 13-31 has no published instrument approaches. 1 New York/New Jersey/Philadelphia Metropolitan Area Airspace Redesign Draft EIS Introduction Page 1-2

1.2 PROPOSED ACTION Numerous alternatives have been investigated and the variations of the alternatives were identified and analyzed in this EA. The analysis provided in Chapter 3 concludes that only one alternative for each project element is practical and feasible relative to meeting the project purpose and need, which is detailed in Chapter 2. These selected alternatives for each project element, in total, are referred to as the Proposed Action. The Proposed Action was developed through a series of aeronautical and engineering studies and analyses as well as preliminary engineering design (30% design) based upon the requirements of FAA AC 150/5300-13 and FAR Part 77. The preliminary engineering design efforts provided approximate footprints and impact estimates that are discussed in this EA. This preliminary engineering design is enclosed in Appendix A Preliminary Engineering Report. Refer to Figure 1-3 Proposed Action for an illustration of the project in its entirety. At the conclusion of these studies it was determined that these individual elements or alternatives meet the project purpose and need and collectively minimizes the amount of impact to human and natural resources to the extent practicable. This Proposed Action is intended to address existing deficiencies in the aging infrastructure, make MM safer and bring the runway closer to compliance with FAA safety and design criteria. The entire Proposed Action includes the following elements: Runway 5-23 Pavement Rehabilitation Runway 5-23 Runway Safety Area Grading and Drainage Improvements Glide Slope Critical Area Stabilization Grading and Drainage Improvements Medium Intensity Approach Lighting System (MALSR) with Runway Alignment Indicatory System Replacement Runway 5 Departure End Extended Runway Safety Area Improvements Runway 23 Departure End Extended Runway Safety Area Improvements Taxiway E Relocation Drainage System and Outfall Replacement Connector Taxiway and Fillet Construction Runway and Taxiway Lighting Rehabilitation and Replacement Runway 13-31 Runway Safety Area Improvements The Proposed Action and each element that creates the Proposed Action are further detailed in Chapter 2 - Purpose and Need; Chapter 3 - Alternatives; and Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequences and Chapter 6 - Mitigation. Introduction Page 1-3

1.3 TIMEFRAME PLANNED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION The following is the planned timeframe to implement the Proposed Action, pending funding availability by FAA. 2014-2015: Complete NEPA EA 2015-2016: Complete Engineering Design 2015-2016: Obtain Regulatory Permits 2017: Construction Begins 1.4 TERMINOLOGY FOR RNWAY DISCSSION The terminology used in this EA to discuss areas of the airport and in particular, Runway 5-23, is based upon the direction of the departures by aircraft. For example, the 23-end of the Runway is used by departures coming from the 5-end; therefore, all references to the 23-end are referred to as Runway 5 Departure End. And, vise versa, the 5-end of the runway is referred to as Runway 23 Departure End. Similar to Runway 5-23, the 13-end of Runway 13-31 is referred to as Runway 31 Departure End and the 31-end is referred to as the Runway 13 Departure End. Introduction Page 1-4

$ 287 HANOER TWP EAST HANOER TWP R Air port d Path: \\mjcolo-dc\k\morristown\t-17895.01 Runway 5-23 EA\Draw\GIS\Topo 2014.mxd MORRIS TWP FLORHAM PARK BORO Legend 0 Airport Property Town Boundaries 1" 4,000 Feet MORRISTOWN MNICIPAL AIRPORT HANOER TOWNSHIP, NJ SCALE : TOPOGRAPHIC LOCATION 1 inch = 2,000 feet Source: SGS Topographic Map, 2014. DATE : SEPTEMBER, 2014 FIGRE : 1-1

287 $ dg Ri HANOER TWP W hi p pa ny Rd Columb Airport EAST HANOER TWP Rd ia Rd MORRIS TWP Columbia T pk e al e ged Rid Legend Ave ve P ar k A Path: K:\MORRISTOWN\T-17895.01 Runway 5-23 EA\Draw\GIS\Location_Aerial.mxd FLORHAM PARK BORO 0 Airport Property Town Boundaries 4,000 Feet 1" MORRISTOWN MNICIPAL AIRPORT HANOER TOWNSHIP, NJ SCALE : 1 inch = 2,000 feet Source: NJGIN High Resolution Imagery, 2012. AERIAL LOCATION DATE : JNE, 2014 FIGRE : 1-2 ed a

RELOCATE THRESHOLD AY 13 RNW -31 CONNECTOR TAXIWAY AND FILLET CONSTRCTION DRAINAGE SYSTEM IMPROEMENTS EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD RNWAY 5-23 PAEMENT REHABILITATION CLERT REPLACEMENT RNWAY SAFETY AREA RNWAY 5-23 RNWAY SAFETY AREA RELOCATE TAXIWAY 'E' SAFETY AREA IMPROEMENTS (EMAS) PROPOSED PAPI RNWAY SAFETY AREA GRADING AND DRAINAGE IMPROEMENTS DISPLACE THRESHOLD PROPOSED PAPI GLIDE SLOPE CRITICAL AREA STABILIZATION SAFETY AREA IMPROEMENTS (GRADING) MALSR APPROACH LIGHTING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT Airport Property MORRISTOWN MNICIPAL AIRPORT HANOER TOWNSHIP, NJ 0 600 1,200 FEET PROPOSED ACTION SCALE: DATE: 1" = 600' Source: NJGIN High Resolution Imagery, 2012 FIGRE: JNE 2014 1-3