Calendar Year 2015 Oklahoma TravelsAmerica Visitor Profile Report Presentation. Calendar Year 2015 Oklahoma TravelsAmerica Visitor Profile Report

Similar documents
The Economic Impact of Tourism in Missouri. Fiscal Year 2016 Summary December 2016

Primary purpose of Trip. All purposes of trip. All Sample Size (N) 2,404 Weighted Percent of Total. 100% (n=2,274.86)

Primary purpose of Trip. All purposes of trip. 100% (n=2,653.44)

Denver 2015 Travel Year

Visit South Walton Visitor Tracking Study: Summer Phillip Downs, Ph.D. Joseph St. Germain, Ph.D. Rachael Anglin Downs & St.

Sports, Recreation, Nature/Outdoors Travel Profile to Virginia

Who Visits Louisiana. A Presentation For the Louisiana Travel Promotion Association March 15, 2007

Mississippi Gulf Coast Visitor Study December 5, 2016

Primary purpose of Trip. All purposes of trip. 100% (n=478.70)

ustravel.org/travelpromotion

2015 North Carolina Visitor Profile. A publication of Visit North Carolina A Unit of the Economic Development Partnership of North Carolina

2011 North Carolina Visitor Profile

2017 North Carolina Visitor Profile. A publication of Visit North Carolina A Unit of the Economic Development Partnership of North Carolina

2016 North Carolina Visitor Profile. A publication of Visit North Carolina A Unit of the Economic Development Partnership of North Carolina

2013 North Carolina Visitor Profile

March TPAC Report 2019

The BedandBreakfast.com B&B Traveler Survey, September 2009

2009 North Carolina Visitor Profile

2014 North Carolina Visitor Profile. A publication of Visit North Carolina A Unit of the Economic Development Partnership of North Carolina

BRANSON 2 nd QUARTER 2014 MARKETING REPORT

Colorado Springs, CO Visitor Report

Census Affects Children in Poverty by Professors Donald Hernandez and Nancy Denton State University of New York, Albany

Introducing Aces... Key Differentiators. Aces 78% Visited casino on P12M trip

2017 North Carolina Regional Travel Summary. A publication of Visit North Carolina A Unit of the Economic Development Partnership of North Carolina

Tampa/Hillsborough County Visitor Report

Entertainment & Amusement Travel Profile to Virginia Source: VA Module of TNS TravelsAmerica, FY2015

Visit South Walton Visitor Tracking Study: Summer Phillip Downs, Ph.D. Joseph St. Germain, Ph.D. Rachael Powell Kerr & Downs Research

Q1 Arrival Statistics. January-March 2015

Southern Virginia Region Travel Profile Source: VA Module of TNS TravelsAmerica, FY2015

2014 North Carolina Image & Advertising Accountability Research

International migration. Total net migration. Domestic migration

Primary purpose of Trip. All purposes of trip. 100% (n=66.37)

Papua New Guinea International Visitor Survey. January December 2017 Simon Milne

Introducing Connected Explorers...

Tampa Bay 2014 Visitor Report

DAYTONA BEACH VISITOR PROFILE

Primary purpose of Trip. All purposes of trip. 100% (n=364.64)

GoToBermuda.com. Q4 Arrivals and Statistics at December 31 st 2015

WAVE II JUNE travelhorizons TM WAVE II 2014 PREPARED AND PUBLISHED BY: MMGY Global

DAYTONA BEACH VISITOR PROFILE

Papua New Guinea International Visitor Survey. January December 2017 Simon Milne

2001 PACKAGED TRAVEL IN NORTH AMERICA TRAVELER PROFILE AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS

Overseas Visitation Estimates for U.S. States, Cities, and Census Regions: 2015

Oregon 2013 Regional Visitor Report The Southern Region

2012 North Carolina Visitor Profile

DAYTONA BEACH VISITOR PROFILE

LEGENDS OUTLETS KANSAS CITY

Friends & Family Travel Profile to Virginia Source: VA Module of TNS TravelsAmerica, FY2015

Coastal Virginia/Eastern Shore Travel Profile Source: VA Module of TNS TravelsAmerica, FY2015

Statistical Report of State Park Operations:

DAYTONA BEACH VISITOR PROFILE

DAYTONA BEACH VISITOR PROFILE

March 2011 Visitor Profile

PROFILE OF MARKET SERVED: Audience Profile for Quarterly. Aircraft Maintenance Technology. Airport Business. Ground Support Worldwide.

2009 North Carolina Regional Travel Summary

Primary purpose of Trip. All purposes of trip. 100% (n=301.53)

Domestic VFR travel to NSW

Reasons for Trip. primary reason. all reasons. 38% Vacation/recreation/pleasure 46% Visit friends/relatives/family event 22% 26%

Primary purpose of Trip. All purposes of trip. All Sample Size (N) 425 Weighted Percent of Total. 100% (n=410.44)

Visit South Walton. Visitor Tracking & ADR Study Fall 2017


Massachusetts Domestic Visitor Profile: Calendar Year 2003

Charlotte County 2016 Summer Tourism. Presented to: Charlotte Harbor Visitor and Convention Bureau

DAYTONA BEACH VISITOR PROFILE

DAYTONA BEACH VISITOR PROFILE

RANKING OF THE 100 MOST POPULOUS U.S. CITIES 12/7/ /31/2016

Reasons for Trip. primary reason. all reasons. 42% Vacation/recreation/pleasure 54% 22% Just passing through 26% Visit friends/relatives/family event

DAYTONA BEACH VISITOR PROFILE

Primary purpose of Trip. All purposes of trip. 100% (n=492.21)

Charlotte County 2017 Summer Tourism. Presented to: Charlotte Harbor Visitor and Convention Bureau

Charlotte County Fourth Quarter 2016 Tourism. Presented to: Charlotte Harbor Visitor and Convention Bureau

Duluth, MN 2015 Visitor Report

Item 4. Scottsdale 2016 Visitor Research

2015 SAN DIEGO VISITOR PROFILE

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau November 2012 Visitor Profile

2011 Visitor Profile Survey

2006 RENO-SPARKS VISITOR PROFILE STUDY

1. Hotel Trends Occupancy Rate

DAYTONA BEACH VISITOR PROFILE

2017 Denver Tourism Results & A Look Ahead. Marketing Advisory Committee (MAC) - August 2, 2018

Oregon 2011 Visitor Final Report

Quality of Cotton Classed by State

Fall 2013 Visitor Profile Alabama Gulf Coast Convention & Visitors Bureau

Minnesota 2014 Visitor Report June 2015

DAYTONA BEACH VISITOR PROFILE

AVSP 7 Summer Section 1: Executive Summary

October 2011 Visitor Profile

March 2012 Visitor Profile

Oregon 2011 Regional Visitor Report The Eastern Region

TRAVEL HABITS OF THE BAY AREA MILLENNIAL

united states of america

AARP Travel Research: Solo Travel

Oregon 2009 Visitor Report June, 2010

November 2011 Visitor Profile

Augusta Visitor Report. Presented: April 20, 2017

Charlotte County 2015 Summer Tourism. Presented to: Charlotte Harbor Visitor and Convention Bureau

April 2012 Visitor Profile

CASINOS March pages ISBN# Published by Richard K. Miller & Associates

Myrtle Beach 2017 Economic Impact Study May Prepared by

West Virginia 2009 Visitor Report December, 2010

Transcription:

TravelsAmerica Visitor Profile Report Presentation

Our time together TNS Your Profile What does it all mean?

TNS One of the largest travel research practices in the U.S World s largest custom marketing research firm Company owned offices in over 100 countries Over 14,000 employees

About WPP TNS 2010

Your Profile

TravelsAmerica: We speak to travelers lots of them 14,000 households a month that s 168,000 American households each year and over 1 million in the last 6 years We are the official research vendor of record to the

Tourism = Important to Oklahoma Visitors vs. Population Person-Trips to State (000) Population (000) 105,767 20,297 14,705 3,911 2,912 27,469 14,908 2,978 Oklahoma Kansas Texas Arkansas Ratio: 5.2 5.1 3.8 5.0

Neighboring Texas dominates Oklahoma s out-of-state visitor source markets Plus, a third (5 of 14) of the top source DMAs are in Texas. Source of Visitors: Top States Base: Visited Oklahoma % of Visitors Residing in... (CY 2015) Source of Visitors: Top DMAs Base: Visited Oklahoma % of Visitors Residing in... (CY 2015) Oklahoma Texas Kansas Arkansas Missouri California Florida Illinois Iowa New York Colorado Minnesota New Mexico Virginia 6% 6% 5% 0% 0% 0% 3 28% CY 2015 CY 2014 36% 4 Panel: State/DMA residence of those who visited Oklahoma (Household Level) Dallas-Ft. Worth Oklahoma City Tulsa Ft. Smith-Fayetteville-Springdale- Wichita-Hutchinson Plus Wichita Falls & Lawton Houston Sherman-Ada Kansas City Shreveport Springfield MO Austin Little Rock/Pine Bluff Waco-Temple-Bryan 20% 18% 20% 2 10% 1

Visitors most commonly use on their own experience to plan an Oklahoma trip Visitors also rely on word-of-mouth, either directly or via social/commercial networking; many take advantage of search engines as well. Information Sources to Plan a Trip Ranked by All Sources (8%+) 60% 66% 60% 5 3 35% 3 39% 25% 2 27% 19% 39% 35% 38% 3 2 1 16% 18% 15% 1 1 1 9% 9% 1 8% 10% 9% 5% 5% 7% 6% 7% 9% 3 26% 27% 2 NET OFFLINE Own Experience Friends/ Relatives NET ONLINE (Incl Social Networking) Search Engines (Google etc.) Social/ Commercial Networking Sources Travel provider Online full website (airline, service travel hotel, rental car, website cruise, tour) (Expedia, Travelocity, etc.) Destination Website NO PLANS MADE All Travelers - CY 2015 OK Visitors - CY 2014 OK Visitors - CY 2015 OK LS Overnight (O/N) Visitors - CY 2015 Q4j. What sources did you use in planning your trip to... (State Level demo wtd) Note: Social/Comm l Network = Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, etc. LS = Leisure O/N = Overnight

Day-trippers and locals (OK residents) spend less time planning and deciding on an Oklahoma trip The shorter time horizon matches expectations since day-trippers and locals have fewer travel considerations (such as lodging, number of meals, transportation logistics) With most visitors living in Oklahoma or a neighboring state, the trip decision occurs more spontaneously than for US travelers overall. Trip Planning (Time Before Visit) All US Travelers (All Trips) CY 2015 OK Visitors Total CY 2013 OK Visitors Total CY 2014 OK Visitors Total CY 2015 OK Visitors Leisure O/N* CY 2015 OK Visitors Leisure Day Trip CY 2015 OK In-State Visitors CY 2015 OK Out-of- State Visitors CY 2015 Considered Within Two Weeks 30% 37% 37% 36% 28% 5 5 29% 2 4 Weeks 17 16 17 16 16 14 15 16 1 3 Months 19 16 17 17 19 13 15 18 3+ Months 34 31 30 31 37 22 19 37 Decided Within Two Weeks 39% 45% 46% 45% 37% 6 6 38% 2 4 Weeks 18 16 17 17 17 13 14 18 1 3 Months 18 16 15 16 20 13 12 18 3+ Months 25 23 23 22 26 13 13 26 Q4i. Please indicate how far in advance you considered traveling to... // Decided to visit... (State Level-demo wtd) *O/N = Overnight 24

Oklahoma and nearby competitors travel parties look very similar Trip Characteristics (Trip Level) All US Travelers CY 2015 Visit OK Visit KS Visit TX Visit AR AVERAGE # IN TRAVEL PARTY 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.9 % Travel in Pairs 40% 4 4 38% 39% % Traveling with Children 28 27 30 30 34 Avg. # of Children on Trip Inc. 0 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 Avg. # of Children on Trip Exc. 0 2.0 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.2 Q3a: Please indicate number of travel party members (including yourself) under 18 and 18+. (Trip Level-demo wtd)

Of competitors, more TX visitors travel for business and fly; OK visitors take shorter trips Trip Choices (Trip Level) PRIMARY TRIP PURPOSE All US Travelers CY 2015 Visit OK Visit KS Visit TX Visit AR NET Leisure 79% 76% 78% 7 7 Visit Friends/Relatives 43 42 51 46 41 Entertainment/Sightsee 13 14 9 9 9 Outdoor Recreation 8 6 5 6 9 Business 12 10 11 14 12 Personal Business/Other 10 14 11 12 15 PRIMARY MODE % Own Auto/Truck 7 8 8 75% 78% % Air Travel Lodging (State Level) 13 7 7 13 5 All US Trips CY 2015 Visit OK Visit KS Visit TX Visit AR AVG # NIGHTS (if any) 2.6 2.6 3.0 3.3 3.3 Private Home 1.0 1.0 1.6 1.5 1.2 Hotel/Motel 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.2 Other 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.9 Q1b: Which was the primary purpose of trip? Q2b: Which was the primary mode of transportation? (Trip Level demo wtd) Q4f: Please specify the number of nights stayed at each listed accommodation. (State Level demo wtd) 29

Oklahoma travelers primarily visit friends/relatives Compared to other US travelers, a much larger share of travelers come for casinos and gaming while fewer shop, enjoy fine dining, or visit beaches. CY 2015 % Activities Participated/Attractions Ranked by 2015 Oklahoma Visitors (Activities with < for Oklahoma not shown) Visiting relatives Casino/ Gaming Shopping Visiting friends Fine dining Museums 26% 28% 3 7% 20% 2 2 17% 17% 15% 1 1 1 1 1 9% 7% 8% Rural sightseeing Historic sites/ Churches Urban sightseeing State park/monuments/ Recreation areas Nightclubs/ Dancing Family reunion 10% 7% 7% 8% 6% 6% 9% 5% 6% 7% 5% 5% 5% 5% Wildlife viewing Art Galleries Zoos/ Aquariums/ Aviaries Sports events (Non- Pro) Spectator Spa/health club Fishing Beaches None of the above 5% 5% 1 CY 2015 All Travelers CY 2015 OK Visitors CY 2015 OK Leisure Q4h. When you visited (state) during trip/ month, please check all of the following activities did/attractions visited. (State Level-demo wtd) 19% 2 15%

Out-of-staters more likely opt for touristy choices Especially gaming, dining, museums, urban sightseeing, clubs/dancing; they also add history and outdoor pursuits (fishing, National parks). In-staters more often visit relatives, go to state parks, and watch their local sports teams. Activities Participated/Attractions Visited by Leisure Visitors % Participated/Visited Ranked by 2014 Oklahoma Out-of-State Visitors Casino/ Gaming 8% 3 Family reunion 5% Camping Visiting relatives Shopping Visiting friends 18% 16% 16% 1 3 36% Wildlife viewing Zoos/ Aquariums/ Aviaries State park/monuments/ Recreation areas 5% 6% National park/monuments/ Recreation areas Local/folk arts/crafts CY 2015 OK Ls Out-of-State CY 2015 OK Ls In-State Note: Ls=Leisure Fine dining 7% 15% Art Galleries Native American ruins/rock art Museums Rural sightseeing Urban sightseeing Historic sites/ Churches Nightclubs/ Dancing 10% 8% 7% 7% 7% 5% 6% Spa/health club Fishing Old homes/ Mansions Musical performance/show Sports events - Youth/ Amateur/ Collegiate/ Other (spectator) Gardens Other nature (photography, rockhound, etc) Motor boat/jet ski None of the above 1 18% Q4h. When you visited (state) during trip/ month, please check all of the following activities did/attractions visited. (State Level-demo wtd) 35

Want to be a traveler, not a tourist 79 % Try to go to places off the beaten path 64 % Kantar Futures 2016 Travel Survey 15

Travel and vacations are all about Adventure and trying new things 87 % Relaxing and unwinding 91 % Kantar Futures 2016 Travel Survey 16

Prefer spending on experiences that enrich my life, like travel and vacations Travel Perceptions by Income Under $50K $50-99K $100K+ 9 89% 8 8 7 76% 81 % Prefer spending on experiences that enrich my life Travel is a luxury worth spending money on Kantar Futures 2016 Travel Survey 17

Kantar Futures 2016 Travel Survey 18

75% I would welcome more novelty and change in my life 7 65% 58% 55% 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011 2015 U.S. Yankelovich MONITOR Surveys

Competitive Environment

Out-of-staters visit a broader variety of destinations Out-of-state visitors more likely visit areas beyond Oklahoma s border states than in-state travelers. Other Areas Visited by Oklahoma Visitors in Past 3 Years (Key Competitors) Ranked by Past Three Years Total Top States Base: Visited Oklahoma (Household Level) Top Cities Base: Visited Oklahoma (Household Level) Texas Arkansas Missouri Kansas Florida Colorado California Louisiana Illinois Arizona Tennessee New Mexico 29% 3 27% 29% 3 28% 2 25% 2 2 17% 26% 2 20% 2 20% 1 2 18% 1 2 17% 1 20% 16% 1 17% 15% 1 17% 15% 1 16% 47% 49% 46% Past 3 Years P3Y - In-State P3Y - Out-of-State Dallas/Ft. Worth Denver Area San Antonio Branson, MO Houston St. Louis Kansas City, MO Las Vegas Chicago Orlando Area 16% 16% 16% 15% 1 18% 15% 18% 1 15% 1 16% 1 15% 1 1 1 15% 1 7% 15% 1 7% 1 1 8% 1 36% 38% 3 Q7a: Please indicate US states visited for leisure in past three years. Q8a: US cities visited past three years.

Oklahoma satisfies visitors better than Kansas or Arkansas However, Texas visitors are the most satisfied among visitors to these four states Only a marginal difference in praise exists between in-staters and out-of-staters. Satisfaction: Extremely/Very Satisfied with Visit to State CY 2014 CY 2015 86% 89% 8 8 88% 8 86% 85% 87% 8 88% 8 OK OK In-State OK Out-of- State KS TX AR OK OK In-State OK Out-of- State KS TX AR Q4l: Using a scale of 1-5 (5=extremely satisfied), please indicate satisfaction with (State Level-demo wtd.)

Export/Import

Oklahoma s imports move above exports Balance of Trade : Oklahoma residents who visit other states spend more ($581) than non-oklahomans do when they visit Oklahoma ($486), contributing to the rise in imports vs. exports However, adding Oklahoma residents spending inside the state ( domestic spending) still keeps total tourism dollars spent in Oklahoma above the total spent by Oklahoma residents elsewhere. CY 2015 46% 4 1 CY 2014 40% 4 19% CY 2013 38% 4 20% Import Export Domestic Import represents $ leaving OK Export represents $ coming into OK Domestic represents $ staying in OK Note: Spending that occurs outside the state by non-residents is not included in the chart.

Connected Life

Travel and baby care lead in engaging consumers Willingness of category users to engage with brands % 67 67 57 45 51 46 49 48 52 54 47 Travel Baby care Personal care Automotive Technology Financial services Household care Personal hygiene Alcoholic drinks Food and drink 54 43 41 40 39 34 30 27 23 23 19 Tobacco Source: TNS Connected Life

Oklahoma visitors look similar to US travelers Heavy usage of both digital and social channels explodes among younger travelers Oklahoma visitors just slightly exceed other US travelers on using technology (fewer functionals). USA Total 30% 17% 20% 3 US Travelers 26% 20% 16% 39% US <45 1 19% 1 55% US 45+ 38% 20% 17% 25% OK Visitors 2 2 16% 39% OK <45 10% 19% 16% 55% OK 45+ 3 2 17% 27% Functional Observer Connector Leader Source: US Digital Life General Report

We can now activate attitudinal mindset through DMPs and look-alike models Internet behavior Look-alike model Ad Ad Ad Seed audience for model obtained through syndicated or custom survey/social query Purchase behavior Ad

Using Oklahoma City travelers as an example You take the known travelers who traveled to OKC from TNS TravelsAmerica data. Blow up these travelers to 5 million potential travelers. Focus your efforts only to the 5 million potential travelers. The sales lifts we are seeing are in the 20% range. 19

American Express Travel, Future Travel Trends 30

What does it all mean? 5 to 1 Close in shorter window Explore versus tour Newness Demos versus digital

john.packer@tnsglobal.com 513.345.2066