Proposal for Global Standard Maneuvering Orders for Tugboats

Similar documents
A Study on Berth Maneuvering Using Ship Handling Simulator

ALL SHIPOWNERS, OPERATORS, MASTERS AND OFFICERS OF MERCHANT SHIPS, AND RECOGNIZED ORGANIZATIONS

How to Fill out Response against Tsunami Checklist

Appendix A COMMUNICATION BEST PRACTICES

Study on the assessment method for results of ship maneuvering training with the simulator

Subject: How to Meet STCW Requirements for Masters, Deck Officers and Other Crew Members of Certain Canadian Ships Operating in Polar Waters

The Polar Code and the Canadian Arctic

PILOT MASTER RELATIONSHIP IN ELECTRONIC WORLD

MARINE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT

MARINE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT

Coastal vessels The number of insurance accidents and accident rate fluctuation 8.0%

IMO Maritime security legislation In September 1986, the MSC approved MSC/Circ. 443 on Measures to prevent unlawful acts that threaten the safety of s

Marine Exchange of Alaska Port of Juneau Navigation Study

APPENDIX 20 EFFECTS ON NAVIGATIONAL SAFETY

TARIFF OF HARBOUR DUES

The role of Unmanned Aircraft System (AUS) in search and rescue (SAR) operations

Maritime Security Policy

CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY, BANGLADESH

A Routine Inspection of the Fixed CO 2 Fire Extinguishing System that led to the Death of Four Officers!

Questions and Answers Cape Town Agreement of 2012

MARINE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT

(Japanese Note) Excellency,

Ratification of Conventions

GENERAL TARIFF PROVISIONS :

MINISTRY OF INFRASTRUCTURES AND TRANSPORT HARBOUR MASTER S OFFICE OF RAVENNA ORDER NO. 97/2017

Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland N.B. Unofficial translation. Legally valid only in Finnish and Swedish

Terms of Reference for a rulemaking task. Implementation of Evidence-Based Training within the European regulatory framework RMT.0696 ISSUE

Dalian VTS Guide for Users

ECDIS Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems

License Requirements and Leased Aircraft

MOORING AND UNMOORING. DECREE N. 407/2018 DATED 31st DECEMBER 2018 BY THE GENOA HARBOUR OFFICE

AIR NAVIGATION ORDER

REGULATIONS (10) FOREIGN AIR OPERATORS

INTERNATIONAL FIRE TRAINING CENTRE

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON WOODEN HOUSE DAMAGE BETWEEN 1995 KOBE EQRTHQUAKE AND 2000 TOTTORI EARTHQUAKE OF JAPAN

Captain J. Ashley Roach, JAGC, USN (retired)

Commonwealth of Dominica. Office of the Maritime Administrator

We would like to inform you regarding the latest IMMARBE Circulars which introduce important changes and will affect the vessel s certification:

ANNEX 2. RESOLUTION MSC.308(88) (adopted on 3 December 2010)

Legal regulations in transport policy

A F F I D A V I T. I, Kevin R. Hogg, being duly sworn, hereby declare and. 1. I am a Special Agent with the Federal Bureau of

Language Proficiency Certification System in Japan

Allision between the MSC BENEDETTA and pier in Zeebrugge on 16 May 2014

The Legal Framework for RPAS/UAS Suitability of the Chicago Convention and its Annexes

THE ISPS CODE. International Ship & Port Facility Security Code and SOLAS Amendments 2002

GUIDANCE RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SOLAS CHAPTER XI-2 AND THE ISPS CODE

R/V «Dr. Fridtjof Nansen» - Fishery and oceanographic research vessel

GUIDELINES ON BUNKERING OPERATIONS AND SHIP TO SHIP CARGO TRANSFER OF OILS, SUBJECT TO ANNEX I OF MARPOL 73/78, IN THE BALTIC SEA AREA

GEN 3. SERVICES GEN 3.6 SEARCH AND RESCUE

Serving the Tampa Bay Maritime Community Since Celebrating over 125 Years of Service

T A R I F F OF PORT CHARGES AND OTHER SERVICES

Airmen s Academic Examination

Finding the Next Generation of Marine Pilots

COLLISION INVESTIGATIONS The new technologies and other interesting bits

Air Accident Investigation Unit Ireland FACTUAL REPORT

Reporting Significant Turbulence Events

Aerodrome Safety. H.V. SUDARSHAN International Civil Aviation Organization

AGREEMENT BETWEEN JAPAN AND THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA FOR AIR SERVICES

AIP GEN SRI LANKA REGULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS 25 MAY 17 GEN 1.2 ENTRY, TRANSIT AND DEPARTURE OF AIRCRAFT

INFORMATION AND GUIDANCE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR PERSONNEL ON SHIPS OPERATING IN POLAR WATERS

Government Decree on the Manning of Ships and Certification of Seafarers (1797/2009)

MINISTRY OF INFRASTRUCTURES AND TRANSPORT HARBOUR MASTER S OFFICE OF RAVENNA ORDER NO. 95/2015

The collision between BLUE BIRD and HAGLAND BONA on 1st December 2008 in Randers Fjord.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GALVESTON WHARVES Tariff Circular No. 6

REPORT OF THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE GROUNDING OF THE MV "LOCATOR" OFF SAINT MACDARA S ISLAND, OFF THE COAST OF GALWAY ON 31st MARCH 2007

MARITIME DIRECTORATE OF RAVENNA. DECREE no. 21/2016

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MERCHANT SHIPPING NOTICE MSN 1613

Aviation Relations between the United States and Canada is Prior to Negotiation of the Air Navigation Arrangement of 1929

Bantry Bay Port Company Limited

The world merchant fleet in Statistics from Equasis

AIP GEN SRI LANKA REGULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS 25 MAY 17 GEN 1.2 ENTRY, TRANSIT AND DEPARTURE OF AIRCRAFT

Airmen s Academic Examination

THE REPUBLIC of LIBERIA LIBERIA MARITIME AUTHORITY

ICAO LPRs from 1996 to now. Nicole Barrette. Kuwait, 9 November Technical Specialist (Licensing and Training Standards)

Bantry Bay Port Company Limited

LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF AIR NAVIGATION SAFETY

GUYANA CIVIL AVIATION REGULATION PART X- FOREIGN OPERATORS.

The Procedures for Entry and Departure into and from, Taipei Harbor

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GALVESTON WHARVES Tariff Circular No. 6

Government Decree on Inspecting Foreign Ships in Finland (1241/2010)

U.S. Coast Guard - American Waterways Operators Annual Safety Report

CIVIL AVIATION REGULATIONS PART 10 COMMERCIAL AIR TRANSPORT BY FOREIGN AIR OPERATORS WITHIN FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA

ADVISORY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SAFE MANNING OF CARGO AND PASSENGER SHIPS

Guidelines for Evaluation of Quality Control for Manufacturing

GROUP ULJANIK PLOVIDBA CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY - DECEMBER 2014

SooYeob, Kim. Director Maritime Safety Department Korea Maritime Institute. 2 September Bangkok

Dear Sirs, Port State Control Concentrated Inspection Campaign (Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU, Indian Ocean MOU and Black Sea MOU)

Cultural understanding and misunderstanding between ruler and ruled: US government and Okinawa, from 1945 to 1972

THE CHICAGO CONVENTION AS A SOURCE OF INTERNATIOINAL AIR LAW

RESOLUTION A.146(ES.IV) adopted on 26 November 1968 AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE SAFETY OF LIFE AT SEA, 1960

CAPTAIN NICHOLAS J. LEWIS Marine Expert

AERONAU INFORMATION MANAGEM. International TENTH MEETING THE QUALITY OF SUMMARY. such quality added). global ATM 1.3. regard, the.

AI AIRCRAFT SERIOUS INCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT PRIVATELY OWNED J A T

CONTRACT OF TRANSPORTATION

FINAL REPORT BOEING B777, REGISTRATION 9V-SWH LOSS OF SEPARATION EVENT 3 JULY 2014

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

A Pilot s perspective

Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka. Implementing Standards (Issued under Sec. 120, Civil Aviation Act No. 14 of 2010)

The pilot and airline operator s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options. Session 2 Presentation 2

Marine Protection Rules Part 101B: Surveys and Inspections Noxious Liquid Substances Carried in Bulk

Transcription:

http://www.transnav.eu the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation Volume 7 Number 4 December 2013 DOI: 10.12716/1001.07.04.05 Proposal for Global Standard Maneuvering Orders for Tugboats A.Ishikura & K.Sugita Marine Technical College, Ashiya, Hyogo, Japan Y.Hayashi & K.Murai Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan ABSTRACT: The use of Standard Maneuvering Orders for tugboats, vocabulary and phrases mutually preagreed between ships and tugboats, is essential for the former to provide clear direction for the latter when berthing or un berthing safely. Tugboats will need time to change their posture before they take actions in response to orders from persons responsible for ships maneuvering. Therefore, when giving directions to change tugboats posture, persons who handle their ships are required to send out tug orders, with regard to delay time, a gap be tween the orders from ships and the actions taken by tugboats. Tug Orders standardized and used in Japan are composed of the following three factors concerning towage work: tugboat s motion, direction and engine power, but the author s research shows that there are Non standard special maneuvering orders other than those standardized, which causes such problems as a gap in perception between pilots and tugboat s opera tors, etc. The purpose of this paper is to research the delay time between orders for and actions by tugboats and consider the appropriate and safe timing of providing instructions to them, and then to propose globally authorized Standard Maneuvering Orders for tugboats, discussing a problem involved in the use of the special orders used in Japan, and the way in which tug orders are used in other countries. 1 INTRODUCTION Maneuvering orders for tugboats should be used with an advance agreement between the operators of ships and of tugboats, for the former operators to provide clear directions to those of tugboats employed, when ships entering or leaving their berth. And it takes some time the operators of tugboats to initiate necessary actions and change their positions after receiving any tug maneuvering orders from the operators of ships. Therefore, any ship operators have to give tug orders in anticipation of this delay time when the posture change of a tugboat is required, which is essential for the security of both herself and a ship supported by her. The purpose of this study is to research the time lag between when a maneuvering tug order is given and when any expected action is taken, and to examine a safer timing to give maneuvering orders to a tugboat. And also the purpose here is to propose the global standardization of maneuvering orders for tugboats, showing the problems caused by using special tug orders in Japan, and weighing how the orders for tugboats are employed in Japan and other foreign countries. 509

2 THE PRESENT CONDITIONS AND PROBLEMS OF THE TUG MANEUVERING ORDERS IN JAPAN In harbors of Japan, maneuvering orders for a tugboat are given by using the commands mutually agreed beforehand between a pilot and a tugboat or by using the Settled Term of Maneuvering Orders for Towage Work set out by Japan Tug Owners Association (hereinafter called, Settled Term, in this paper), and in Japanese. Here is Figure 1 which shows a flow chart of tug maneuvering orders set out in Settled Term, in which they shall be provided in the following order: the instructions for the movement ( Push or Pull), the engine power, and the direction (given by Clockwise ). Figure 1. Flow chart of Tug orders in Japan However, there are some other special tug orders for each of her movement, engine power, and direction than those in Settled Term. And also the research reveals that the special orders to maneuver a tug and use her engine are more frequently used, and that there is a gap in perception between a pilot and a tug operator giving and receiving the orders. We will begin by considering the problems of the special tug orders relating to her movement and engine power in Japan, and the findings of our research on the orders for tugboats used in U.S.A. and Sri Lanka. 2.1 Tug orders (Movement) in Japan In Japan, as Table 1 indicates, there are many special orders requiring a tugboat to prepare for next movements or to change her positions, and to use her engine at the same time. And also there are some different phrases of tug orders though they require the same movements for a tugboat. 2.2 Tug orders (Engine Power) in Japan As for engine power, there are more than a dozen non standard orders other than Settled Term, such as, in descending order, Dead Slow, Half of Dead Slow, Quarter of Dead Slow, Minimum, and Omega (driving Clutch), etc., all of which are weaker than sostandardized Slow in Settled Term. And also in the case of engine power, there are different phrases of orders requiring the same power output for a tug, as is the case in orders for her movements. There are such orders as One Eighth of Dead Slow or 3% of Maximum Power other than all of these nonstandard engine orders requiring engine power of less than Dead Slow (25%). Table 2. Special tug orders in Japan (Power) Motion Tug Orders Phrases Their Meaning (in Japanese) (in English) Power based DEAD SLOW NO Half of Dead slow on Engine HANBUN Telegraph DEAD SLOW NO Half of one eighth of 1/2~1/8 Dead slow OMEGA Using OMEGA slipping Clutches It is not based KARUKU Lightly on Engine MINIMUM At a minimum level Telegraph GOKUGOKU Very soft BISOKU Very slow 2.3 Tug orders in U.S.A. (Los Angeles, Long beach) In U.S.A. (Los Angeles, Long beach), the standard tug orders shall be given in the following order: the instructions for movements ( Push or Pull ) first, followed by engine power and direction (given by Angle based on ship) of a tugboat. Compared to the case in Japan, a distinguished difference is that there are only six kinds of engine power orders in U.S.A., as shown in Figure 2, and that special tug orders as used in Japan are hardly employed. Another difference is that, in U.S.A., a tugboat responds to a pilot with a whistle while transceiver used in Japan. Table 1. Tug orders (Movement) in Japan Motion Tug Orders Phrases Their Meaning (in Japanese) (in English) Positioning HIKU YOUI Stand by Pulling order only OSU YOUI Stand by Pushing YOKONINARE Side by side Positioning HARIAWASERU Give a tension order add in BURASAGARE Apply load Engine Power ATAMA O TUKERU Attach the bow OSITUKE Keep a pushing MOTAREKAKARE Keep a pushing YORIKAKARE Keep a pushing DAKITUKE Side by side Figure 2. Flow chart of Tug orders in U.S.A(Los Angeles, Long beach) 510

2.4 Tug orders in Sri Lanka In Sri Lanka, the flow of the standard tug orders is, as follows: the instructions for tug s movements (using Push or Pull ), engine power and direction (given by Clockwise ), in this order. The orders for the preparation for tug s movements, which is not standardized as Settled Term in Japan, are those among the standard tug orders in Sri Lanka. And also there are only six kinds of tug order for engine power (shown in Figure 3), as is in the case of U.S.A., and special tug orders, which are very often used in Japan, are hardly employed. Figure 3. Flow chart of Tug orders in Sri Lanka 2.5 Communication among bridge team The common language used on the bridge should be English, as required in the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, and therefore SMCPs is developed in English. In November 2001, the Assembly of the International Maritime Organization adopted as Resolution A.918 (22), the IMO Standard Marine Communication Phrases (SMCPs) intended to replace the Standard Marine Navigational Vocabulary (SMNV) adopted in 1977 and amended in 1985. The purpose of SMCPs is to standardize the English terms and phrases commonly used in bridge to bridge and bridge to shore communication, and then to contribute a safer navigation. However in Japan, the communication between a ship and a tugboat engaged in the operations to enter and leave berth is established in Japanese. When a pilot and a tugboat use their local native language in any foreign ports of call, the captain of the ship and her crew cannot understand what they are talking about, and then have to let the pilot completely maneuver the ship, where they cannot have any doubt about the pilot s maneuvering intentions. According to Japan Coast Guard, there were 2,187 marine accidents (Except for accidents caused by force majeure (346 vessels)) in total in 2011 (within a single year), in fact 332 of which occurred in harbors. They also say that 1,681 of 2,187 marine accidents occurred because of human error (the rate of occurrence of 77%). Many shipping companies in Japan have introduced the Bridge Resource Management training (hereinafter called, BRM, in this paper) to prevent a chain of human error which is the main factor of marine accident. In addition, the BRM training has been mandated for seafarers as minimum requirements for certification of officers in charge of a navigational watch by the 2010 Manila amendments to the STCW Convention and Code (Table A II/1). Pilots use the language which the key personnel on board the ship can understand when explaining their intentions to them. However, as in Japan, pilots may use a local language understandable for operators of tugboat and grand staff on wharf or pier when conveying their intentions or giving the instructions to them by transceiver. Figure 4 shows the information flow chart on board the ship entering or leaving berth with the service of tugboats employed, where pilots perform the berthing operations, playing a pivotal role as a key person to give orders to tugboats or ships and to share information with ground staff on a wharf or pier. Generally speaking, standard maneuvering orders, mutually agreed between a pilot and an operator of tugboat beforehand, are used in their communication. However, our research reveals that these orders are not globally standardized, but employed only as locally limited orders agreed between pilots and tugboats. In some cases, the orders not agreed between their users may be used in Japan. In these situations, the crew on board cannot understand what a pilot and an operator of tugboat or ground staff are communicating about, where, although the pilot possibly makes a human error, the crew cannot realize their dangerous situation because of the language difficulties. 3 POSITION CHANGE ORDERS FOR TUGBOAT AND ITS DELAY TIME Figure 4. Information flow in Navigation Bridge 3.1 Method of research We used the data of front affixed video cameras on bridge and the AIS position data derived from tugboats in the ports of Tokyo and Yokohama from January 2011 to July 2012. These video data include their shooting date, time, and also sound. By using the shooting dates recorded in the video data, we measured a gap between when a position change 511

order for a tug from a pilot is given and when necessary actions for the order are completed. 3.2 Results of research The results of the research on the amount of time spent on tugs changing their positions are shown in Figure 5 Such tug orders as Push or Pull are generally given after the advance announcement of actions are given to tugboats by using the tug orders such as Stand by to push or Stand by to pull, which are not standardized in Japan. However, the orders of Stand by to push or Stand by to pull may be followed by Push or Pull without any gap. Each average value of the time length spent on tugs changing positions is, as follows in the descending order: Stand by to pull to Push, Stand by to push to Stand by to pull, Stand by to push to Pull, Stand by to pull to Pull, and Stand by to push to Push. In each case, there are 5 to over 10 seconds of delay time on average. In addition, when a ship is navigating or a long tug line is used, it takes some more time a tugboat to change her positions. Taking for instance the case in which a tugboat changes her positions from Stand by to pull to Push, the time length spent on her changing positions is shown in Figure 6 when a ship is navigating and in Figure 7 when a tug line of various lengths is used. It is essential to maneuver a ship with a prediction based on this delay time when she is navigating or a long line is used on board the ship which has higher freeboard. Figure 7. Transition time by every length of tug s line (From S/B Pull to Push) 4 CONCLUSIONS In Japan, U.S.A., and Sri Lanka, as our research shows above, maneuvering orders for a tugboat are commonly given in the following order: motion, engine power, and direction. As for the orders for tugʹs movements, ʺPushʺ and ʺPullʺ are used as the common terms in ports of all the countries. However, the tug orders for her engine power and direction varies in each country. Especially in ports of Japan, some special terms of the orders for engine power and direction are used, and, moreover, pilots and tugboats communicate in Japanese, their local language. And it takes a certain amount of time for a tugboat to change her positions after her maneuvering orders given. The length of this time delay tends to become longer when the tugboat have to change her positions drastically (as in the case of her changes of motion from ʺPushʺ to ʺPullʺ or vice versa), when there is a rather long distance between a ship and a tugboat (in which a correspondingly long tug line is used), or when the ship is moving though very slowly. 5 PROPOSAL Figure 5. Transition time between tug boat s actions Figure 6. Transition time between tug boat s actions (S/B Pull Push)by ship s speeds In the communication between a pilot and an operator of tugboat, some standard orders mutually agreed beforehand between them are general used, but these tug orders, as our research reveals, are not globally standardized yet, and these orders are used with rather locally agreed between them. In Japan, some maneuvering orders even not agreed between their users may be employed. In the berthing operations, pilots are playing a pivotal role as a key person to provide necessary maneuvering orders to tugboats and ships, and to share information with ground staff on a wharf or pier. And also pilots are required to handle various operations at the same time while maneuvering a ship because they have to give engine power orders to each of the operators of multiple tugboats and the officers or quartermasters on board the ship. Moreover, they have to give tug maneuvering orders in anticipation of a time lag between when an order is given and when any necessary actions are taken and 512

completed, so it is absolutely essential for bridge team members to double check the maneuvering intentions on pilots side in order to ensure navigational safety. Here we recommend and propose that globallystandardized orders for maneuvering a tug are settled and included in SMCPs for the bridge team to serve its function for maritime safety. REFERENCES International Maritime Organization, 2002, IMO Standard Marine Communication Phrases. 63 Ishikura,A., Sugihara,S., Hayashi,Y. & Murai,K. 2011. A Research on Maneuvering Orders for Towage Service in Japan. The Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation. 125: 91 97 Japan Coast Guard. 2012. Kainan no genjyo to taisaku ni tuite. Edtion.2011:9 513