INFO R ME DE SU CALIDA D ARGENTINE WHEAT INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY REPORT. 19th edition CROP. trigoargentino.com.ar

Similar documents
LOCALIDAD EMPRESA TELEFONO

Cláudia V. Godoy José T. Yorinori Brazil - Embrapa Soybean. Wilfrido M. Paiva Paraguay - CRIA

LARGE SCALE LAND ACQUISITIONS PROFILE ARGENTINA

Argentina Control of unregistered work in the construction industry. An experience based on social dialogue and active involvement of stakeholders

08-15 FDI/GDP (%, average) Foreign Direct Investment (Avg. USD BB/Year) Average 4.5% % 5.0% 6.0x 3.9% 3.4% 2.

3.3 COST ESTIMATION OF THE MAIN PROJECTS. (1) Main projects. 1) Improvement of export corridor

Landing in Latin America & Peering Landscape in Argentina

National Consumer Price Index. Background and General Characteristics. Economía

Landing in South America & Peering Landscape in Argentina

Public Works Research Institute

JANUARY 25, 2018 BUENOS AIRES GRAIN EXCHANGE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ESTIMATES ISSN

Implementation Status & Results Argentina Urban Transport in Metropolitan Areas (P095485)

Argentina Country Case Study

M.O.P. (HYDROMETIC SECTION) REPORT RIVER DEPTHS REPORTED:

Historical Background. Lesson 3 The Historical Influences How They Arrived in Argentina and Where the Dances Popularity is Concentrated Today

Assessing the Impacts of ENSO on South American Agriculture

Implementation Status & Results Argentina Essential Public Health Functions Programs II Project (P110599)

Clean and Inclusive Cities in Argentina. November Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized

Status of the National Transport Plan and its impact on the development of the country

EMILIO MITRE CHANNEL / PARANA RIVER: Navigation normal.

Infrastructure: Networks to Sustain Development

EMILIO MITRE CHANNEL / PARANA RIVER: MARTIN GARCIA CHANNEL

EMILIO MITRE CHANNEL / PARANA RIVER: MARTIN GARCIA CHANNEL

Jefatura de Gabinete de Ministros. Unidad Plan Belgrano

-Dr Panambi Abadie Executive Secretary, AUGM

Floods increasing in Buenos Aires Salado River Basin. González, Marcela Hebe and Fernández, Adriana Elsa

VERY PRELIMINARY DRAFT Please do not quote. Alejandra Agustina Martínez INVECO, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán Argentina

PARANA RIVER / EMILIO MITRE CHANNEL / MARTIN GARCIA CHANNEL / RIVER PLATE: Navigation normal.

Implementation Status & Results Argentina National Urban Solid Waste Management Project (P089926)

Lelé Trabb Argentinian Capital Federal, Argentina

Implementation Status & Results Argentina AR Basic Municipal Services Project (P060484)

Biblioteca Nacional de la República Argentina (National Library of Argentina) Agüero 2502 (At Las Heras Av.) RECOLETA BUENOS AIRES

MAXIMUM RATE OF RIVER AND PORT PILOTAGE SERVICES. In accordance with the provisions of Article 1 of Annex I of Decree No. 2694/91,

ARGENTINA MODERNIZATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND AIRPORT SERVICES

Opportunities, Challenges, Actions

Birth Register and Statistics. A big challenge for the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) Dr Fatima Marinho, HDM/HA Coordinator

Draft forecast and recommendation:

LAND SPECULATION AND LATIFUNDIA IN BUENOS AIRES PROVINCE AFTER ROSAS DICTATORSHIP ( ).*

PARANA RIVER / EMILIO MITRE CHANNEL / MARTIN GARCIA CHANNEL / RIVER PLATE: Navigation normal.

INDEX. ARCHITECTURE Formosa

Buenos Aires VISITOR S GUIDE. Welcome

Will keep you informed. Best regards,

About us. Arq. Giacomo Zanone General Manager

Argentina: Floods. DREF operation n MDRAR006 FL ARG 3 December 2009

Protecting Mountain Biodiversity. IPROMO (Italy) July

Recoleta Cemetery: Buenos Aires

PAHO Regional Perspective: Strengthening CR-VS in the Americas

Selection of Potential Sites in Argentina for the Deployment of new Nuclear Power Plants

Emergency Appeal Operations Update Argentina: Floods

Entre Rios Province Map, Argentina (Spanish Edition) By Automapa

ARGENTINA. Argentine Confederation Argentine Republic - Seal of the Republic Broad "C" in "CENTAVOS", Accent on "U" of "REPUBLICA" 1862 GREEN

Manufacturing & Infrastucture

Implementation Status & Results Argentina National Urban Solid Waste Management Project (P089926)

PARANA RIVER / EMILIO MITRE CHANNEL / MARTIN GARCIA CHANNEL: Navigation normal.

10 Places to visit in Buenos Aires in the Spring

CBA Presentation XXIII Comité Mixto Empresario Argentino-Japonés

Modeling the Distribution of Agricultural Drought by Means of Soil Water Deficit

Implementation Status & Results Argentina AR Road Safety (P116989)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL HUMANITARIAN AID AND CIVIL PROTECTION - ECHO

REGION 3: South America

PARANA RIVER / EMILIO MITRE CHANNEL:

NEUQUÉN Senator 1,66 CABA Senator 1,66. RÍO NEGRO Senator 1,55. CHACO Senator 1,45. ENTRE RÍOS Senator 1,19. TIERRA DEL FUEGO Senator 1,16

Implementation Status & Results Argentina Norte Grande Road Infrastructure (P120198)

Jefatura de Gabinete de Ministros. Unidad Plan Belgrano

PARANA RIVER / EMILIO MITRE CHANNEL / MARTIN GARCIA CHANNEL: Navigation normal.

Indicative Territorial Planning

Stephanie Stefanski PhD Student, University Program in Environmental Policy Nicholas School of the Environment Duke University

Essential Questions. 1. How have historical figures and events affected South America today?

UCSF. Universidad Católica de Santa Fe INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION. Catholic University of Santa Fe. Higher Education

PARANA RIVER / EMILIO MITRE CHANNEL / MARTIN GARCIA CHANNEL: Navigation normal.

PARANA RIVER / EMILIO MITRE CHANNEL / MARTIN GARCIA CHANNEL: Navigation normal.

PLAN YOUR TRIP. Country Map. Welcome to Argentina. Argentina s Top 20. Need to Know. What s New. If You Like... Month by Month.

By INFOBA DMC Argentina EVT Buenos Aires, Argentina

IV CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL IV INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS

The nation of Argentina is located in South America and covers more than one

PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: AB5489 Project Name. Norte Grande Transport Infrastructure Development Project Region

Norte Grande Road Infrastructure (P120198)

GLOBAL ILLICIT CULTIVATION OF COCA BUSH AND PRODUCTION OF COCA LEAF AND COCAINE, CULTIVATION (a) OF COCA BUSH IN HECTARES

Environmental Impact Assessment of the dredging operations and aids to navigation works in the Argentina s Santa Fe Confluencia waterway.

2Q13 Corporate Presentation

SAMPLE TOUR ARGENTINA. Perform in BUENOS AIRES & SURROUNDS OR CÓRDOBA, ROSARIO & BUENOS AIRES. Your World of Music

MARKET REPORT. Argentina: Low-Cost Airlines - the New Protagonists

South American Countries. Capital Location Population Terrain Climate

Wheat Update Arkansas Is Our Campus. August 2014 ARKANSAS WHEAT PERFORMANCE TRIALS AND VARIETY SELECTION. Methods

Feasibility Study for the Improvement of the National Route 2 and Route 7 Final Report CHAPTER 8 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS

Argentina. Argentina A Reading A Z Level S Leveled Book Word Count: 1,048 LEVELED BOOK S

The Director of Transparency Policy Planning Anticorruption Office Ministry of Justice, Security, and Human Rights Dr. Roberto de Michele

STATE OF THE ART OF PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES IN ARGENTINA

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WATER MANAGEMENT IN FEDERAL AND FEDERAL-TYPE COUNTRIES

Inform 2013 San Antonio, TX, USA November 18-21, "Innovative platforms for training and communications in PulseNet Latin America and Caribbean"

POWERLIFTING COMPETITION SHEET

III.8. MERCOSUR - Chile Hub

Strategic considerations for network expansion in the economic region Rio de la Plata

Terminal elevator tariff summaries, Western. Crop year

Argentine Capital SHIPS. Argentine aircraft carriers. Type Name Flight Deck Secondary Tertiary AA Move Hull Fuel. Moreno (63) AC04 Pueyreddon 32 (10)

Objective. Students will familiarize themselves with the physical features and climates of Latin America.

Ecosystem context in the Environmental Impact Assessment of the Dredging Operations in the Argentina s Santa Fe

ARGENTINA. Marine Rescue Co-ordination Centre: Bahía Blanca (PREFECTURA NAVAL) Region: III Position: 38 43'S 62 6'W

Argentina - North, South, East and West

BRAZIL. Pacific. Atlantic. Ocean. Miles 500. Map 1 Argentina and its provinces

Transcription:

INFO R ME DE SU CALIDA D ARGENTINE WHEAT INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY REPORT 19th edition 2016 2017 CROP trigoargentino.com.ar

WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM) 2016/2017 GROWING SEASON FINAL CONSIDERATIONS AND SAMPLING STRUCTURE The 2016/17 wheat growing season once again was marked by high yields in the main growing areas and by protein levels above those registered in the previous season, reaching almost 1%. National production is estimated at 18.34 million tons, up 62.9% from 2015/16 season that reached 11.26 million tons. The average national yield was 3,308 kg/hectare, up 444 kg/ha from last season average. The crop cycle started with good water availability in the soil, which favored seedling and crop growth. Grain filling was under no water stress in the central region. However, in the south, there was some water stress, which led to yields lower than expected. In the central-north region, temperatures at planting and tillering were regular. At grain filling, October and November, temperatures were mild with peaks that favored a longer grain filling period, with better-developed grains of greater weight. Southbound, mid temperatures copied historical averages, (17/18 C), but there were a significant variation and periods of extreme temperatures. In the central-north wheat region, an early attack of wheat leaf rust (Puccinia triticina) continued along the season; susceptible cultivars suffered the most. Later a more serious attack of stem rust (Puccinia graminis) was detected in very susceptible cultivars. Yellow spot was mild as Bacterial leaf blight (Pseudomonas syringae). Fusarium appeared in very particular plots and did not disseminate. Bugs were detected early in the season. In the south, the incidence of foliar diseases was not important. PLANTED AREA, HARVESTED AREA, PRODUCTION AND YIELD, BY SUB-REGIONS //////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Based on data from the Ministerio de Agroindustria de la Nación. 2016-2017 Crop SUBREGION AREA PLANTED AREA HARVESTED YIELD PRODUCTION (HA) (HA) (KG/HA) (TN) ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// I 585.900 526.675 2.980 1.569.706 II North 888.150 794.975 4.227 3.360.729 II South 948.000 851.770 4.326 3.684.423 III 375.800 346.060 3.242 1.121.848 IV 581.400 522.500 3.388 1.770.486 V North 1.019.600 916.570 3.138 2.876.198 V South 1.236.900 1.112.180 2.744 3.052.040 NORTHEAST 280.250 184.770 2.066 381.793 NORTHWEST 423.715 289.045 1.804 521.412 NATIONAL 6.339.715 5.544.545 3.308 18.338.635 SAMPLING 4.095 PRIMARY SAMPLES 319 LOCATY COMPOSITE SAMPLES 9 SUBREGION COMPOSITE SAMPLES WHEAT ANALYSIS WHEAT ANALYSIS WHEAT ANALYSIS FLOUR ANALYSIS FLOUR ANALYSIS SAMPLING STRUCTURE //////////////////////////////////////////////////////// LOCALITY SUBREGION COMPOSITE SAMPLING SAMPLES (TONS) PRODUCTION (TONS) PRODUCTION SAMPLED /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// I 16 58.020 1.569.706 3,7 II North 68 399.786 3.360.729 11,9 II South 51 158.000 3.684.423 4,3 III 29 99.035 1.121.848 8,8 IV 31 117.063 1.770.486 6,6 V North 46 186.287 2.876.198 6,5 V South 67 236.785 3.052.040 7,8 NORTHEAST 4 14.000 381.793 3,7 NORTHWEST 7 24.000 521.412 4,6 TOTALS 319 1.292.976 18.338.635 7,0

NATIONAL AVERAGES Weighted averages by tons produced in each region National Averages ///////////////////////////// Test Weight (kg/hl) 75,20 86,20 80,91 Total Damaged Kernels (%) 0,00 2,50 0,39 PROTEIN (13.5% MOISTURE) VS TEST WEIGHT /////////// 15 85.0 84.0 Foreign Material (%) 0,06 2,74 0,38 Shrunken and Broken Kernels (%) 0,04 2,12 0,47 Yellow Berry Kernels (%) 0,00 30,80 5,83 Protein (13,5% Moisture) (%) 8,3 13,0 10,4 Protein (S.S.S) (%) 9,6 15,0 12,0 Weight of 1000 Kernels (g.) 25,80 42,40 35,20 Protein 13,5 % Moisture [%] 12 9 6 3 10.6 81.49 11.1 80.76 11.6 11.4 80.18 77.98 10.5 79.29 9.9 79.63 10.4 80.91 83.0 82.0 81.0 80.0 79.0 78.0 77.0 76.0 Test Weight [Kg/Hl] Ash (S.S.S.) (%) 1,243 2,119 1,756 0 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 75.0 CROP ////////// 63% O/G: Out of 27% O/G 1% G3 9% //////////////////////////// MILLING Wet Gluten (%) 16,4 32,2 25,0 Dry Gluten (%) 6,1 11,9 9,1 Falling Number (sec.) 244 509 395 Flour Yield (%) 47,0 70,0 58,6 Ash (dry basis) (%) 0,424 0,744 0,579 Water Absorption (14% H ) (%) 50,5 62,8 56,0 Development Time (min.) 1,3 43,7 12,6 Stability (min.) 1,8 59,3 23,1 Degree of Softening (12 min.) 0 90 30 P (mm) 47 162 93 L (mm) 30 129 76 W joules X 10-4 120 457 256 P / L 0,43 3,57 1,22 W [Joule] 300 250 200 150 100 W, WET GLUTEN Y ESTABILITY ////// 281 270 277 239 26.9 26.2 28.5 27.4 23.8 15.8 13.1 15.7 35.0 31.7 256 238 30.0 222 25 23.3 25.0 21.8 23.1 10.9 50 5.0 0 0.0 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 CROP 20.0 15.0 10.0 Wet Gluten [%] Stability [min] P.3 ARGENTINE WHEAT / 16/17 CROP Quality Report

NATIONAL SUMMARY BY SUBREGIONS Results of all the analyzed variables SUBREGIONS I II N II S III IV V N V S NEA NOA PONDERED AVERAGE Test Weight (kg/hl) 80,61 80,13 81,95 81,00 80,19 79,54 82,97 78,39 82,23 80,91 Weight of 1000 kernels (gr) 35,09 33,90 36,09 39,37 34,49 35,32 34,39 33,20 35,60 35,20 Ahs (dry basis) % 1,768 1,800 1,705 1,728 1,649 1,702 1,806 2,040 1,746 1,756 Protein (13,5% Moisture) (%) 10,1 10,0 10,2 10,3 11,0 10,8 10,3 12,3 11,7 10,4 Protein (dry basis) (%) 11,7 11,5 11,8 11,9 12,7 12,5 11,9 14,3 13,6 12,0 Ash (dry basis) % 0,645 0,509 0,546 0,542 0,533 0,600 0,562 0,654 0,616 0,579 Color L 85,52 87,87 89,28 89,06 88,25 87,08 89,28 87,55 87,60 87,94 a -1,25-1,74-1,59-1,53-1,60-1,37-1,86-1,16-1,27-1,49 b 9,67 10,37 8,67 8,51 9,28 9,30 10,18 7,22 8,27 9,05 Moisture (%) 13,19 14,78 15,27 15,32 14.86 15,12 14,68 15,12 15,16 14,83 Protein (%) 9,5 8,7 8,9 8,8 9.6 10,0 9,2 10,6 10,6 9,5 Wet Gluten (%) 23,8 22,7 23,7 24,4 24,2 25,7 24,4 27,1 29,0 25,0 Dry Gluten (%) 8,5 8,1 8,8 8,8 8,8 9,3 8,8 10,0 10,7 9,1 Index Gluten (%) 100 100 99 98 99 100 100 93 93 98 Falling Number (sec) 424 380 408 380 417 403 412 412 321 395 Zeleny Test (cc) 24 24 28 27 31 30 27 26 27 27 Water Absorption (%) 54,0 54,1 55,2 55,6 56,1 56,1 57,4 55,9 59,9 56,0 Development Time (min) 6,3 7,1 14,3 9,0 24,0 11,0 17,5 16,1 9,4 12,6 Stability (min) 11,8 15,8 28,2 18,1 38,3 21,5 35,8 24,6 16,1 23,1 Degree pf Softening (U.F.) 48 45 20 33 12 29 19 27 40 30 Quality Number 138 216 346 185 437 204 487 255 197 274 MIXOGRAM Development Time (min) 5,08 6,80 7,16 4,87 7,10 6,06 6,11 7,75 5,29 6,25 P (mm) 75 82 100 84 103 85 108 100 100 93 L (mm) 89 73 60 79 69 94 66 74 75 76 G 20,6 17,5 19,3 19,9 17.6 22,7 17,5 15,7 21,1 19,1 W (Joules x 10-4) 227 221 233 235 278 281 270 292 269 256 P/L 0,84 1,12 1,67 1,06 1,49 0,90 1,64 1,36 1,33 1,22 Ie % 58,0 62,5 62,8 57,1 61,9 57,6 60,3 67,6 59,8 60,8 W (40) (Joules x 10-4) 132 170 163 154 171 149 189 189 175 166 CONSISTOGRAMA WA 1700 (%) (Base 15%) 55,7 55,4 54,5 55,2 55,4 56,7 55,6 55,6 56,9 55,7 HYD2200 (%) (Base 15%) 53,2 52,9 52,0 52,7 52,9 54,2 53,1 53,1 54,4 53,2 PrMax (mb) 2360 2257 2096 2139 2091 2329 2182 2238 2214 2212 PrMax Time (Sec) 86 91 98 123 235 117 157 189 112 134 Tolerance (Sec) 225 260 302 291 374 234 331 292 287 288 Weakening 250 (mb) 433 272 141 132 12 339 51 74 159 179 Weakening 450 (mb) 1020 829 621 658 419 883 603 627 846 723 RVA Maxim Viscosity (RVU) 206,33 231,42 239,00 224,00 249,75 221,50 261,58 246,25 177,33 228,57 Minimum Viscosity (RVU) 122,17 140,00 155,67 136,42 162,71 124,50 183,58 147,33 94,25 140,74 Final Viscosity (RVU) 221,33 253,75 271,50 261,48 280,30 242,83 296,75 288,50 205,67 258,01 BAKING Absorption (%) 61,0 61,0 62,0 62,0 61,0 62,0 62,0 61,0 62,5 61,6 Development Time (min) 03:00 03:00 03:30 03:30 03:00 03:30 03:30 03:00 04:00 03:30 Fermentation Time (min) 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 Loaf Volume (cc) 630 640 650 610 628 650 625 570 585 621 Specific Volume (cc/gr) 4,6 4,8 4,9 4,5 4,6 4,9 4,6 4,1 4,3 4,6

ARGENTINE WHEAT Main Quality Parameters Main Quality Parameters Northwest of the Country Test Weight (kg/hl) 82,23 43% 14% 43% -- 11,7 13,6 29,0 269 16,1 Northeast of the Country Test Weight (kg/hl) 78,39 25% 75% -- -- 12,3 14,3 27,1 292 24,6 Subregion I Subregion V North Test Weight (kg/hl) 79,54 33% 52% 15% -- Northwest of the Country Northeast of the Country Test Weight (kg/hl) 80,61 38% 56% 6% -- 10,1 11,7 23,8 227 11,8 Subregion V South 10,8 12,5 25,7 281 21,5 Test Weight (kg/hl) 82,97 24% 57% 16% 3% 10,3 11,9 24,4 270 35,8 V North V South I II North III II South IV Subregion III Test Weight (kg/hl) 81,0 28% 72% -- -- Subregion II North 10,3 11,9 24,4 235 18,1 Test Weight (kg/hl) 80,13 19% 78% 2% 1% 10,0 11,5 22,7 221 15,8 Subregion IV Subregion II South Test Weight (kg/hl) 80,19 Test Weight (kg/hl) 81,95 19% 74% 7% -- 35% 59% 6% -- 11,0 12,7 24,2 278 38,3 10,2 11,8 23,7 233 28,2 P.5 ARGENTINE WHEAT / 16/17 CROP Quality Report

SUBREGION I ANALYSIS RESULTS Weighted averages by tons of sample sets per location ////////////////////////////////////////// Test Weight (kg/hl) 78,0 82,40 80,61 Total Damaged Kernels (%) 0,22 0,70 0,45 56% Foreign Material (%) 0,06 0,74 0,32 Shrunken and Broken Kernels (%) 0,20 1,20 0,59 Yellow Berry Kernels (%) 4,10 30,80 10,39 Protein (13,5% Moisture) (%) 8,9 10,8 10,1 Protein (S.S.S)(%) 10,3 12,5 11,7 Weight of 1000 Kernels (g.) 30,82 40,60 35,09 Ash (S.S.S.) (%) 1,696 1,896 1,768 Total damaged kernels includes 0,04% green kernels, 0,09% frostand kernels, 0,04% sprouted kernels, 0,12% insect chewed kernels and 0,17 % calcinated kernels. No damages due to carbon and burnt kernels. Santiago del Estero 9 de Julio Vera General Obligado Percentage distribution 38% G3 6% PROTEIN (13,5% MOISTURE) (%) 29.7% 41.1% 19.5% 6.6% 0.3% 2.7% 0.0% 8 9 10 11 12 13 over Santa Fe These graphic were elaborated with 344 primary samples (farmer deliveries) San Cristóbal San Justo San Javier A Córdoba San Justo Castellanos La Capital Las Colonias Garay Rio Paraná Entre Ríos San Martín San Jerónimo /////////////////////////////////////////// Wet Gluten (%) 17,3 27,9 23,8 Dry Gluten (%) 6,2 9,7 8,5 MILLING Falling Number (sec.) Flour Yield (%) 330 47,0 508 51,0 424 49,3 Ash (dry basis) (%) 0,538 0,742 0,645 Water Absorption (14% H )(%) 51,7 55,5 54,0 Development Time (min.) 5,2 8,0 6,3 Stability (min.) 8,6 16,3 11,8 Degree of Softening (12 min.) 29 67 48 P (mm) 47 88 75 L (mm) 61 115 89 W Joules x 10-4 154 275 227 P/L 0,43 1,44 0,84 A These results were elaborated with 16 composite samples prepared proportionally from 344 primary samples (farmer deliveries)

SUBREGION II NORTH ANALYSIS RESULTS Weighted averages by tons of sample sets per location ////////////////////////////////////////// Test Weight (kg/hl) 77,60 83,40 80,13 Total Damaged Kernels (%) 0,00 1,90 0,56 78% Foreign Material (%) 0,10 2,30 0,37 Shrunken and Broken Kernels (%) 0,10 1,10 0,48 Yellow Berry Kernels (%) 1,30 30,10 7,73 Protein (13,5% Moisture) (%) 9,0 10,9 10,0 Protein (S.S.S)(%) 10,4 12,6 11,5 O/G: Out of 19% O/G 1% G3 2% Weight of 1000 Kernels (g.) 29,00 36,90 33,99 Ash (S.S.S.) (%) 1,655 1,925 1,800 Total damaged kernels includes 0,01% de burnt kernels, 0,02% green kernels, 0,03% frosty kernels, 0,06% sprouted kernels, 0,04% insect chewed kernels, 0,27% calcinated kernels, and 0,14% germ-chewed kernels. No damages due to carbon. Unión Santa Fe San Martín Belgrano San Jerónimo Iriondo Río Paraná Entre Ríos PROTEIN (13,5% MOISTURE) (%) Percentage distribution 35.9% 29.1% 17.3% 14.4% 0.5% 2.6% 0.2% 8 9 10 11 12 13 over Marcos Juarez San Lorenzo These graphic were elaborated with 423 primary samples (farmer deliveries) Córdoba Caseros Gral. López Rosario Constitución Pergamino San Nicolás Ramallo Roque Sáenz Peña Colón Buenos Aires /////////////////////////////////////////// Wet Gluten (%) 18,6 27,8 22,7 Dry Gluten (%) 6,5 9,7 8,1 MILLING Falling Number (sec.) Flour Yield (%) 339 49,3 451 61,0 380 57,0 Ash (dry basis) (%) 0,455 0,585 0,509 Water Absorption (14% H )(%) 50,5 56,9 54,1 Development Time (min.) 1,3 27,9 7,1 Stability (min.) 1,8 59,3 15,8 Degree of Softening (12 min.) 5 90 45 P (mm) 59 111 82 L (mm) 36 109 73 W Joules x 10-4 154 314 221 P/L 0,54 3,08 1,12 These results were elaborated with 68 composite samples prepared proportionally from 423 primary samples (farmer deliveries). P.7 ARGENTINE WHEAT / 16/17 CROP Quality Report

SUBREGION II SOUTH ANALYSIS RESULTS Weighted averages by tons of sample sets per location ////////////////////////////////////////// Test Weight (kg/hl) 79,40 84,40 81,95 Total Damaged Kernels (%) 0,02 1,89 0,32 59% Foreign Material (%) 0,08 1,48 0,35 Shrunken and Broken Kernels (%) 0,04 1,00 0,32 Yellow Berry Kernels (%) 0,45 7,12 3,14 Protein (13,5% Moisture) (%) 8,3 11,7 10,2 Protein (S.S.S)(%) 9,6 13,5 11,8 Weight of 1000 Kernels (g.) 31,35 41,07 36,09 Ash (S.S.S.) (%) 1,550 2,055 1,705 Total damaged kernels includes 0,03% green kernels, 0,03% frostand kernels, 0,04% sprouted kernels, 0,06% insect chewed kernels, 0,18% calcinated kernels. No damages due to carbon and burnt kernels. Córdoba San Pergamino Pedro Arrecifes Baradero Zarate Saenz G. López Peña G. Arenales Escobar Rojas SA. de Salto C. de Areco G. Villegas L.N.Alem Chacabuco Areco Pilar Junín Giles S.A. Luján G. Pinto C. Federal Río de Mercedes y G.B.A. Ameghino la Plata Las Heras Gral. Chivilcoy La Plata Lincoln Viamonte Navarro Bragado S. Vicente 9 Magdalena Lobos Brandsen C. Tejedor de julio 25 de mayo R. Pérez Gral. Rivadavia Monte Verónica Paz Pehuajó Carlos Saladillo Casares Chascomús Trenque Lauquen Bolívar Gral. Alvear Las Flores H. Yrigoyen Tapalqué Daireaux Guaminí Santa Fe Colón Alberti Buenos Aires Entre Ríos E. Cruz Campana G. Belgrano R.O. DEL URUGUAY Percentage distribution 35% G3 6% PROTEIN (13,5% MOISTURE) (%) / 0.6% 13.9% 31.5% 35.6% 13.2% 3.7% 1.5% 8 9 10 11 12 13 over These graphic were elaborated with 539 primary samples (farmer deliveries) /////////////////////////////////////////// Wet Gluten (%) 16,4 29,8 23,7 Dry Gluten (%) 6,1 11,0 8,8 MILLING Falling Number (sec.) 322 509 408 Flour Yield (%) 58,9 61,7 60,4 Ash (dry basis) (%) 0,457 0,641 0,546 Water Absorption (14% H )(%) 50,8 59,8 55,2 Development Time (min.) 2,7 32,4 14,3 Stability (min.) 4,9 54,2 28,2 Degree of Softening (12 min.) 0 51 20 P (mm) 67 126 100 L (mm) 30 99 60 W Joules x 10-4 120 324 233 P/L 0,68 3,28 1,67 These results were elaborated with 51 composite samples prepared proportionally from 539 primary samples (farmer deliveries).

SUBREGION III ANALYSIS RESULTS Weighted averages by tons of sample sets per location ////////////////////////////////////////// Test Weight (kg/hl) 78,70 83,20 81,00 Total Damaged Kernels (%) 0,20 0,85 0,48 72% Foreign Material (%) 0,09 0,71 0,26 Shrunken and Broken Kernels (%) 0,17 1,05 0,46 Yellow Berry Kernels (%) 4,81 11,50 7,78 Protein (13,5% Moisture) (%) 9,7 10,9 10,3 Protein (S.S.S)(%) 11,2 12,6 11,9 Weight of 1000 Kernels (g.) 36,50 42,04 39,37 Ash (S.S.S.) (%) 1,410 1,970 1,728 Total damaged kernels includes 0,15% green kernels, 0,06% sprouted kernels, 0,06% insect chewed kernels, 0,11% germ-chewed kernels and 0,11% calcinated kernels. No damages due to carbon, frostand kernels and burnt kernels. Santa Fe Río Paraná Paraná La Paz Corrientes Villaguay Feliciano Federación Federal Entre Ríos Concordia Percentage distribution 28% PROTEIN (13,5% MOISTURE) (%) 46.2% 0.0% 7.7% 26.1% 17.7% 2.4% 0.0% 8 9 10 11 12 13 over These graphic were elaborated with 509 primary samples (farmer deliveries) Diamante Victoria Nogoyá Gualeguay Uruguay Tala Colón Gualeguaychú R.O. DEL URUGUAY Buenos Aires Río de la Plata /////////////////////////////////////////// Wet Gluten (%) 21,2 26,6 24,4 Dry Gluten (%) 7,9 9,6 8,8 MILLING Falling Number (sec.) 286 427 380 Flour Yield (%) 50,5 63,0 58,5 Ash (dry basis) (%) 0,493 0,729 0,542 Water Absorption (14% H )(%) 53,2 56,5 55,6 Development Time (min.) 3,1 20,0 9,0 Stability (min.) 11,3 38,8 18,1 Degree of Softening (12 min.) 8 61 33 P (mm) 65 104 84 L (mm) 51 106 79 W Joules x 10-4 191 283 235 P/L 0,68 2,02 1,06 These results were elaborated with 29 composite samples prepared proportionally from 509 primary samples (farmer deliveries). P.9 ARGENTINE WHEAT / 16/17 CROP Quality Report

SUBREGION IV ANALYSIS RESULTS Weighted averages by tons of sample sets per location ////////////////////////////////////////// Test Weight (kg/hl) 76,10 83,05 80,19 Total Damaged Kernels (%) 0,00 0,38 0,07 74% Foreign Material (%) 0,12 1,12 0,35 Shrunken and Broken Kernels (%) 0,20 1,30 0,53 Yellow Berry Kernels (%) 0,00 8,20 1,88 Protein (13,5% Moisture) (%) 9,7 12,8 11,0 Protein (S.S.S)(%) 11,2 14,8 12,7 19% G3 7% Weight of 1000 Kernels (g.) 28,40 40,40 34,49 Ash (S.S.S.) (%) 1,469 1,842 1,649 Total damaged kernels includes 0,02% frostand kernels, 0,01% sprouted kernels, 0,02% insect chewed kernels, 0,01% calcinated kernels. No damages due to carbon, green kernels and burnt kernels. Gral. Lamadrid Cnel. Pringles Buenos Aires Olavarria Laprida Tapalqué Gles. Chaves Benito Juarez Azul Tres San Arroyos Cayetano Tandil Rauch Pila Balcarce Lobería Necochea Ayacucho Gral. Guido Dolores Río de La Plata Tordillo Gral. Lavalle Maipú Gral. Pinamar Madariaga Mar Villa Gesell Chiquita Gral. Alvarado Gral. Pueyrredon PROTEIN (13,5% MOISTURE) (%) Percentage distribution 38.0% 28.4% 15.5% 11.9% 4.1% 1.8% 0.4% 8 9 10 11 12 13 over These graphic were elaborated with 563 primary samples (farmer deliveries) Océano Atlántico /////////////////////////////////////////// Wet Gluten (%) 17,3 29,6 24,2 Dry Gluten (%) 6,4 10,8 8,8 MILLING Falling Number (sec.) 283 496 417 Flour Yield (%) 49,0 61,5 58,8 Ash (dry basis) (%) 0,480 0,627 0,533 Water Absorption (14% H )(%) 52,9 61,2 56,1 Development Time (min.) 6,5 40,4 24,0 Stability (min.) 16,0 54,6 38,3 Degree of Softening (12 min.) 0 37 12 P (mm) 62 132 103 L (mm) 48 129 69 W Joules x 10-4 197 412 278 P/L 0,48 2,44 1,49 These results were elaborated with 31 composite samples prepared proportionally from 563 primary samples (farmer deliveries).

SUBREGION V NORTH ANALYSIS RESULTS Weighted averages by tons of sample sets per location ////////////////////////////////////////// Test Weight (kg/hl) 75,20 83,05 79,54 Total Damaged Kernels (%) 0,06 2,50 0,67 52% Foreign Material (%) 0,10 1,38 0,35 Shrunken and Broken Kernels (%) 0,10 1,36 0,40 Yellow Berry Kernels (%) 0,00 20,60 5,78 Protein (13,5% Moisture) (%) 9,5 12,6 10,8 Protein (S.S.S)(%) 11,0 14,6 12,5 Weight of 1000 Kernels (g.) 31,90 38,50 35,32 33% G3 15% Ash (S.S.S.) (%) 1,433 2,119 1,702 Total damaged kernels includes 0,07% green kernels, 0,04% frostand kernels, 0,04% sprouted kernels, 0,11% insect chewed kernels, 0,29% calcinated kernels and 0,11% germ-chewed kernels. No damages due to carbon and burnt kernels. Santiago del Estero San Luis Ischilín Cruz del Eje Minas Pocho San Alberto Sobremonte Punilla San Javier Calamuchita Río Cuarto Tulumba Colón Capital Juárez Celman Rio Seco Totoral Río Primero Tercero Arriba Córdoba Río Segundo Gral. San Martín San Justo Unión Santa Fe PROTEIN (13,5% MOISTURE) (%) 39.2% Percentage distribution 0.0% 8 20.2% 16.9% 12.9% 7.1% 3.7% 9 10 11 12 13 over These graphic were elaborated with 590 primary samples (farmer deliveries) Pres. Roque Saenz Peña Buenos Aires /////////////////////////////////////////// Wet Gluten (%) 21,4 32,0 25,7 Dry Gluten (%) 7,8 11,3 9,3 MILLING Falling Number (sec.) 325 494 403 Flour Yield (%) 65,0 70,0 67,7 Ash (dry basis) (%) 0,424 0,702 0,600 Water Absorption (14% H )(%) 53,2 62,7 56,1 Development Time (min.) 1,7 19,6 11,0 Stability (min.) 3,0 43,0 21,5 Degree of Softening (12 min.) 11 56 29 P (mm) 58 106 85 L (mm) 69 125 94 W Joules x 10-4 196 339 281 P/L 0,52 1,51 0,90 These results were elaborated with 46 composite samples prepared proportionally from 590 primary samples (farmer deliveries). P.11 ARGENTINE WHEAT / 16/17 CROP Quality Report

SUBREGION V SOUTH ANALYSIS RESULTS Weighted averages by tons of sample sets per location ////////////////////////////////////////// Test Weight (kg/hl) 79,45 86,20 82,97 Total Damaged Kernels (%) 0,00 0,78 0,08 57% Foreign Material (%) 0,10 2,74 0,54 Shrunken and Broken Kernels (%) 0,06 2,12 0,56 Yellow Berry Kernels (%) 0,00 18,90 4,86 Protein (13,5% Moisture) (%) 9,0 13,0 10,3 Protein (S.S.S)(%) 10,4 15,0 11,9 24% O/G: Out of O/G 3% G3 16% Weight of 1000 Kernels (g.) 25,80 42,40 34,39 Ash (S.S.S.) (%) 1,618 2,022 1,806 Total damaged kernels includes 0,01% sprouted kernels, 0,01% insect chewed kernels, 0,01% calcinated kernels and 0,05% germ-chewed kernels. No damages due to carbon, frostand kernels and green kernels. San Luis Loventué La Pampa Utracán Lihuel Calei Gral. Roca Rancul Realicó Hucal Chapaleufú Rivadavia Maracó Trenel Conhelo Quemú Quemú Capital Catriló Toay Atreucó Guatraché Pellegrini Puán Santa Fe Trenque Lauquen Tres Lomas Salliqueló Guamini Adolfo Alsina Tornquist Buenos Aires Cnel. Suarez Saavedra Cnel. Pringles PROTEIN (13,5% MOISTURE) (%) Percentage distribution 41.3% 32.1% 8.6% 8.7% 7.5% 0.1% 1.7% 8 9 10 11 12 13 over These graphic were elaborated with 1059 primary samples (farmer deliveries) Caleu Caleu B. Blanca Villarino Cnel. Rosales Cnel. Dorrego Río Negro Patagones Océano Atlántico /////////////////////////////////////////// Wet Gluten (%) 19,2 32,2 24,4 Dry Gluten (%) 6,9 11,7 8,8 MILLING Falling Number (sec.) 354 456 412 Flour Yield (%) 48,7 63,3 55,8 Ash (dry basis) (%) 0,480 0,698 0,562 Water Absorption (14% H )(%) 54,2 62,8 57,4 Development Time (min.) 5,5 43,7 17,5 Stability (min.) 5,9 59,3 35,8 Degree of Softening (12 min.) 0 49 19 P (mm) 82 162 108 L (mm) 42 97 66 W Joules x 10-4 187 457 270 P/L 0,97 3,57 1,64 These results were elaborated with 67 composite samples prepared proportionally from 1059 primary samples (farmer deliveries).

NORTH OF THE COUNTRY ANALYSIS RESULTS Weighted averages by tons of sample sets per location ////////////////////////////////////////// Test Weight (kg/hl) 77,25 83,50 80,81 Total Damaged Kernels (%) 0,02 0,88 0,25 36% Foreign Material (%) 0,08 0,87 0,33 Shrunken and Broken Kernels (%) 0,04 0,58 0,29 Yellow Berry Kernels (%) 1,30 4,38 2,84 Protein (13,5% Moisture) (%) 10,8 12,6 12,0 Protein (S.S.S)(%) 12,5 14,6 13,9 Weight of 1000 Kernels (g.) 30,6 40,1 34,72 37% G3 27% Ash (S.S.S.) (%) 1,243 2,092 1,854 Total damaged kernels includes 0,01% de burnt kernels, 0,10% green kernels, 0,11%sprouted kernels, 0,04% insect chewed kernels, 0,02% frosty kernels and 0,01% calcinated kernels. No damages due to carbon and germ-chewed kernels. Océano Pacífico CHILE Jujuy Salta Catamarca BOLIVIA Tucumán Santiago del Estero Chaco PARAGUAY Formosa PROTEIN (13,5% MOISTURE) (%) // 32.8% Percentage distribution 23.4% 18.8% 17.2% 4.7% 1.6% 1.6% 10 11 12 13 14 15 over These graphic were elaborated with 68 primary samples (farmer deliveries) /////////////////////////////////////////// Wet Gluten (%) 24,8 32,1 28,3 Dry Gluten (%) 9,2 11,9 10,5 MILLING Falling Number (sec.) 244 453 354 Flour Yield (%) 59,5 60,2 59,9 Ash (dry basis) (%) 0,497 0,744 0,630 Water Absorption (14% H )(%) 53,5 61,9 58,4 Development Time (min.) 5,7 20,0 11,8 Stability (min.) 7,2 36,5 19,2 Degree of Softening (12 min.) 3 67 35 P (mm) 78 132 100 L (mm) 53 83 74 W Joules x 10-4 215 379 277 P/L 0,98 2,15 1,34 These results were elaborated with 11 composite samples prepared proportionally from 68 primary samples (farmer deliveries). P.13 ARGENTINE WHEAT / 16/17 CROP Quality Report

DURUM WHEAT NATIONAL AVERAGES Analysis Results Averages Durum //////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Test Weight (kg/hl) 75,20 85,05 80,67 Total Damaged Kernels (%) 0,00 1,04 0,18 Foreign Material (%) 0,06 3,48 0,63 Shrunken and Broken Kernels (%) 0,14 8,84 0,82 Vitreous Kernels (%) 6,00 86,00 51,92 (Triticum aestivum) (%) 0,64 14,46 3,51 Protein (13,5% Moisture) (%) 9,3 14,3 11,9 Protein (s.s.s.) (%) 10,8 16,5 13,8 Weight of 1000 Kernels (gr.) 34,50 52,80 44,12 Ash (% dry basis) 1,512 1,950 1,741 Total damaged kernels includes 0,03% calcinated kernels 0,01% green kernels, 0,04% sprouted kernels, 0,01% insect chewed kernels and 0,09% germ-chewed. CROP 2016 / 2017 ////////////////////////////////////////// Planted Area (ha) 64.538 Harvested Area (ha) 62.828 4% G3 2% Average Yeld (kg/ha) 2.585 Production (tn) 162.426 30% Reference: Ministerio de Agroindustria de la Nación. O/G: Out of Observation: O/S (Out Standard) for condition: 56%; 22%; G3: 22% O/G 64% SEMOLIN ANALYSIS Minimum Maximum Average //////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Falling Number (seg.) 382 620 497 Color(B) 16,6 24,6 21,0 Wet Gluten (%) 20,3 36,5 29,4 Gluten Index 24 97 68 FARINOGRAPH Energy Level 21,6 37,5 27,4 FARINOGRAPH Degree Softening (%) 17 42 31 These results were elaborated with 50 composite samples. Jujuy BOLIVIA PARAGUAY Córdoba VN R.O. DEL URUGUAY Río de la Plata CHILE Buenos Aires Océano Pacífico Salta Catamarca Tucumán Santiago del Estero Formosa Chaco La Pampa V Sud Guatraché Bordenave Guaminí IIS Cnel. Suarez Pila Dolores Tordillo Rauch Azul G. Guido Gral. Olavarría Lavalle Ayacucho Maipú Madariaga IVTandil Cnel. Vidal LapridaBenito Juarez Gles. Chaves Gral. Lamadrid Cnel. Pringles Gral. Dorrego Tres Arroyos San Cayetano Balcarce Lobería Necochea Gral. Pueyrredon Alvarado Océano Atlántico

ANALYSIS OF VARIABLES, BY RANGES Tables summarize the analysis of four variables: protein in grain, wet gluten, strength determined by alveograph measurement and farinographic stability. Each variable was separated in ranges (first column). Averages were estimated for each range for each remaining variables (center column). This last column shows the percentage that corresponds to each range nationwide. PROTEIN (13.5% Moisture) RANGE Wet Gluten W Stability Percentage Country ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 18,7 8,0-8,9 158 1,1 24,4 21,5 9,0-9,9 216 20,1 23,2 24,5 10,0-10,9 253 66,8 24,8 26,3 11,0-11,9 289 8,0 28,6 29,7 12,0-12,9 330 4,0 23,2 Percentage Country 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% PROTEIN (13.5% MOISTURE H ) /////////////////////////// 1.1% 20.1% 66.8% 8.0% 4.0% 8.0-8.9 9.0-9.9 10.0-10.9 11.0-11.90 12.0-13.0 Range results WET GLUTEN RANGE Protein W Stability Percentage Country ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 10,1 15-17,9 228 1,6 26,2 9,4 18,0-20,9 204 8,1 19,5 10,0 21,0-24,9 240 47,7 25,5 10,9 25,0-27,9 269 37,2 25,6 12,0 28,0-31,9 316 5,4 22,7 Percentage Country 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% WEB GLUTEN /////////////////////////// 1.6% 8.1% 47.7% 37.2% 5.4% 15.0 a 17.9 18.0 a 20.9 21.0 a 24.9 25.0 a 27.9 28.0 a 32.5 Range results W RANGE Wet Gluten Protein Stability Percentage Country ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 19,9 120-189 9,2 4,3 17,0 23,3 190-249 10,1 66,3 22,3 25,4 250-299 10,6 21,5 27,8 25,1 300-349 11,1 6,1 29,8 30,1 350-399 12,5 1,9 28,1 Percentage Country 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% W /////////////////////////// 4.3% 66.3% 21.5% 6.1% 1.9% 120 a 189 190 a 249 250 a 299 300 a 349 350 o Mayor Range results STABILITY RANGE Wet Gluten Protein W Percentage Country ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 22,3 1,0-9,9 9,8 16,6 217 25,0 10,0-14,9 10,4 13,2 245 24,9 15,0-19,9 10,5 24,3 244 25,3 20,0-29,9 10,9 24,6 280 23,9 30,0-39,9 10,6 8,7 263 23,8 40-49,9 10,3 7,6 256 23,1 50-59,9 10,0 5,0 244 Percentage Country 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% STABILITY /////////////////////////// 16.6% 13.2% 24.3% 24.6% 8.7% 7.6% 5.0% 1.0 a 9.9 10.0 a 14.9 15.0 a 19.9 20.0 a 29.9 30.0 a 39.9 40.0 a 49.9 50.0 a 59.9 Range results P.15 ARGENTINE WHEAT / 16/17 CROP Quality Report

Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria INF OR ME DE SU CALIDA D trigoargentino.com.ar