Connecting ASBU with your State Air Navigation Plan For: CANSO Asia Pacific Conference 2016 Presented by: M. Tanino, ATO International NextGen Lead Date: May 6, 2016 1
You will learn Air Navigation Plan (ANP) Aviation System Block Upgrades (ASBU) Relationship between ASBU and ANP Why and What for me? What do I have to do to create the State ANP? How the State ANP look like? 2
Why? $2.2 trillion 2.9 billion $5.3 trillion Procedures Efficiency Environment Procedures Safety Procedures 3
Do you remember? VHS Betamax 188x104x25mm Tape width: 12.7mm 156x96x25mm Tape width: 12.65mm 4
ICAO Global Air Navigation Plan What is the GANP? Supports a harmonized global Air Navigation System It is an overarching framework Addresses key civil aviation policy principles Assists ICAO Regions and States to establish air navigation priorities for the next 15 years Assists ICAO Regions and States to prepare their navigation plans 5
ICAO Regional and Member States Air Navigation Plans (ANPs) Following the 12th Air Navigation Conference, a new GANP was developed and approved by the 38th Session of the ICAO Assembly in Sep/Oct 2013. IP Regional Air Navigation Plan Template and Procedure for Amendment was presented in 2014. GANP Regional ANPs State ANPs 6
New Electrical ANP (eanp) Improve access and version control by migrating the ANPs from paper based and early electronic version into a web based platform to facilitate easy access Provide more effective amendment process Align the content of the regional ANPs with the revised GANP and ASBUs Remove unnecessary and duplicated information that is available elsewhere 7
Afghanistan Australia Bangladesh Bhutan Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Cook Islands Democratic People's Republic of Korea Fiji India Indonesia Japan Asia-Pacific States Kiribati Lao People's Democratic Republic Malaysia Maldives Marshall Islands Micronesia (Federated States of) Mongolia Myanmar Nauru Nepal New Zealand Pakistan Palau Papua New Guinea Philippines Republic of Korea Samoa Singapore Solomon Islands Sri Lanka Thailand Timor Leste Tonga Vanuatu Viet Nam 8
Regional ANP GANP Regional ANP State ANP 9
Content of the new Regional eanp Volume I Stable plan elements. Amendments require approval by the Council Volume II Dynamic plan elements amendments are approved by regional agreement Volume III Dynamic/flexible plan elements for implementation, planning and guidance using ASBU and technology road maps. These elements require approval by Planning Implementation Regional Groups (PIRGs) - does not require approval by the Council 10
Summary of ANP GANP Regional ANP State ANP 11
Relationship: GANP and ASBU GANP introduces: ASBU approach ASBU structure Future capabilities Priorities Technology roadmaps 12
Aviation System Block Upgrades (ASBU) Background NextGen, SESAR, CARATS, and other States provide the foundation for ASBU GANP provides and information on: ASBU framework ASBU modules and associated technologies ASBU are designed so that: Regions and States can select modules and implement based on their operational needs Regions and States can implement modules according to their schedule 13
ASBU Structure: (1) Performance Improvement Areas (PIA), (2) Blocks, (3) Threads, (4) Modules 14 14
ASBU Structure: (1) Performance Improvement Areas (PIA), (2) Blocks, (3) Threads, (4) Modules, and (5) PIA 1 PIA 2 PIA 3 PIA 4 15
Performance Improvement Areas (PIA) and Phases of Flight PIA 1: Airport Operations PIA 2: Globally Interoperable Systems & Data PIA 3: Optimum Capacity and Flexible Flights PIA 4: Efficient Flight Paths 16
Blocks PIA 1 PIA 2 PIA 3 PIA 4 17
ASBU: Performance Improvement Areas, Blocks, Threads, Modules, and Elements PIA 1 PIA 2 PIA 3 PIA 4 18
PIA 1: Airport Operations Thread Block 0 Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 ACDM B0-ACDM B1-ACDM APTA B0-APTA B1-APTA RATS B1-RATS RSEQ B0-RSEQ B1-RSEQ B2-RSEQ B3-RSEQ SURF B0-SURF B1-SURF B2-SURF WAKE B0-WAKE B1-WAKE B2-WAKE 19
ASBU Threads Airport Operations - Full AMAN/DMAN/SMAN ACDM Airport CDM APTA Airport Accessibility RATS Remote ATS RSEQ Runway Sequencing SURF Surface Operations WAKE Wake Turbulence Separation Globally Interoperable Systems & Data - through Globally Interoperable SWIM AMET Advanced MET Information DATM Digital ATM FICE FFICE SWIM SWIM Optimum Capacity & Flexible Flight through Global Collaborative ATM ACAS Airborne Collision Avoidance Sys ASEP Airborne Separation ASUR Alternative Surveillance FRTO Free Route Operations NOPS Network Operations OPTL Optimum Flight Levels SNET Ground-Based Safety Nets Efficient Flight Paths through Trajectory-based Operations CCO Continuous Climb Operations CDO Continuous Decent Operations RPAS Remotely Piloted Aircraft Sys. TBO Trajectory-Based Operations 20
ACDM B0 B1 PIA1 Modules: Airport Operations Improved Airport Operations through Airport-CDM Optimized Airport Operations through Airport-CDM APTA B0 Optimization of Approach Procedures including Vertical Guidance B1 Optimized Airport Accessibility RATS B1 Remotely Operated Aerodrome Control RSEQ SURF WAKE B0 B1 B2 B3 B0 B1 B2 B0 B1 B2 Improve Traffic Flow through Sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) Improved Airport Operations through Departure, Surface and Arrival Management Linked Arrival Management and Departure Management (AMAN/DNAM) Integration AMAN/DMAN/SMAN Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A-SMGCS Level 1-2) Enhanced Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations SURF, SURF-IA and Enhanced Vision Systems (EVS) Optimized Surface Routing and Safety Benefits (A-SMGCS Level 3-4 and SVS) Increased Runway Throughput through Optimized Wake Turbulence Separation Increased Runway Throughput through Dynamic Wake Turbulence Separation Advanced Wake Turbulence Separation (Time-Based) 21
Data + SWIM PIA 2 Modules: Globally Interoperable Systems & Data AMET B0 B1 B3 DATM B0 B1 FICE B0 B1 B2 B3 SWIM B1 B2 Meteorological Information Supporting Enhanced Operational Efficiency and Safety Enhanced Operational Decisions through Integrated Meteorological Information (Planning and Near-term Service) Enhanced Operational Decisions through Integrated Meteorological Information (Nearterm and Immediate Service) Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management Service Improvement through Integration of all Digital ATM Information Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity though Ground-Ground Integration Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Flight and Flow Information for a Collaborative Environment Step-1 (FF-ICE/1) Application before Departure Improved Coordination through Multi-Centre Ground-Ground Integration (FF-ICE, Step -1 and Flight Object, SWIM) Improved Operational Performance through the Introduction of Full FF-ICE Performance Improvement through the Application of SWIM Enabling Airborne Participation in Collaborative ATM through SWIM 22
ACAS ASEP B0 B2 B0 B1 B2 Airborne Collision Avoidance Systems (ACAS) Improvements New Collision Avoidance System Air Traffic Situational Awareness (ATSA) Increased Capacity and Efficiency through Interval Management Airborne Separation (ASEP) ASUR B0 Initial Capability for Ground Surveillance FRTO NOPS OPFL SNET B0 B1 B0 B1 B2 B3 B0 B2 B0 B1 PIA 3 Modules: Optimum Capacity & Flexible Flight Improved Operations through Enhanced En-route Trajectories Improved Operations through Optimized ATS Routing Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network-Wide View Enhanced Flow Performance through Network Operational Planning Increased User Involvement in the Dynamic Utilization of the Network Traffic Complexity Management Improved Access to Optimum Flight Levels through Climb/Descent Procedures using ADS-B Increased Effectiveness of Ground-Based Safety Nets Ground-based Safety Nets on Approach 23
PIA 4 Modules: Efficient Flight Paths CCO B0 Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Departure Profiles Continuous Climb Operations (CCOs) CDO RPAS TBO B0 B1 B2 B1 B2 B3 B0 B1 B3 Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles using Continuous Descent Operations (CDOs) Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDOs) using VNAV Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDOs) using VNAV, Required Speed and Time of Arrival Initial Integration of Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) into Non-segregated Airspace Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) Integration in Traffic Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) Transparent Management Improved Safety and Efficiency through the Initial Application of Data Link Enroute Improved Traffic Synchronization and Initial Trajectory-Based Operation Full 4D Trajectory-Based Operations 24
25 Airport Operations Globally Interoperable System & Data Globally Collaborative ATM Effective Flight Path B0-WAKE B0-SURF B0-ACDM B0-RSEQ B1-SWIM B0-FRTO B0-NOPS B0-ASUR B0-ASEP B0-SNET B0-ACAS B0-OPFL B0-APTA B0-CDO B0-CCO B0-TBO B1-RATS B0-AMET B0-FICE B0-DATM B1-RPAS B1-APTA B1-WAKE B2-WAKE B2-SURF B1-SURF B1-ACDM B3-RSEQ B2-RSEQ B1-RSEQ B3-AMET B1-AMET B3-FICE B2-FICE B1-FICE B1-DATM B2-SWIM B1-FRTO B3-NOPS B1-NOPS B2-NOPS B1-ASEP B2-ASEP B1-SNET B2-ACAS B1-CDO B2-CDO B3-TBO B2-RPAS B3-RPAS Thread Dependency Prerequisite Module Dependencies B1-TBO
Elements: Working Document for the ASBU 1. Narrative 1.1 General 1.2 Baseline 1.3 Change brought by the module 1.4+ Elements Descriptions 2. Intended Performance Operational Improvement 3. Necessary Procedures (A and G) 4. Necessary System Capability 5. Human Performance 6. Regulatory/Standardization needs and Approval Plan (A and G) 7. Implementation and demonstration Activities 8. Reference Documents 26
Elements Identification Initial identification is completed based on the ASBU document Collaboration with NAVCANADA and ICAO NACC Office via North American ANP Creation of ASBU Handbook emphasis on Elements ICAO North Atlantic (NAT) has adopted the ASBU Handbook Regions and States can add their specific requirements as Elements Need to work with ICAO HQ to agree on the definition of elements 27
B0 and B1 Elements (as of Oct 2015) B0 PIA Modules Elements PIA 1 5 20 PIA 2 3 18 PIA 3 7 17 PIA 4 3 8 Total 18 63 B1 PIA Modules Elements PIA 1 6 26 PIA 2 4 16 PIA 3 4 13 PIA 4 3 14 Total 17 69 Based on the NAM ASBU Handbook Most Elements are derived from working document for ASBU Need to work with ICAO HQ to agree on the definition of elements 28
Sample Elements B0 WAKE Elements 1. (Defined: Element 1) New PANS-ATM wake turbulence categories and separation minima 2. (Derived from Element 2) Dependent diagonal paired approach procedures for parallel runways with centrelines spaced less than 760 meters (2,500 feet) apart 3. (Derived from Element 3) Wake independent departure and arrival procedures for parallel runways with centrelines spaced less than 760 meters (2,500 feet) apart 4. (Derived from Element 3) Wake turbulence mitigation for departures procedures for parallel runways with centrelines spaced less than 760 meters (2,500 feet) apart 5. (Identified by the United States) 6 wake turbulence categories and separation minima 29
30
Did someone asked you B0-SURF Surface Operations - Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A- SMGCS Level 1-2) 1. Which airports in your State currently have implemented A- SMGCS level 1 and 2? 2. Estimate the percentage of aircraft movements which are operating girth A-MSGCS in your state/region? 3. Which additional airports in your state/organization will implement A-SMGCS Level 1 and 2 in 2018? 4. What percentage of aircraft movements do you estimate will be operating with A-SMGCS in your state in 2018? 31
Did someone asked you B0-FRTO Free-Route Operations - Improved Operations through Enhanced En- Route Trajectories 1. Is FUA currently implemented in your State/region (please specify the geographical extent in terms of FIR)? 2. Is there a plan to implement or increase FUA in your State/region (please specify the geographical extent in terms of FIR prior to 2018)? 3. How many track miles annually do you currently save as a result of FUA implementation or changes to validate periods for restricted airspace? What percentage of operations des this represent annually? 4. How many track miles annually do you expect to save in. 32
Did someone asked you B0-NOPS Network Operations - Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network-Wide view 1. Is strategic traffic flow management currently used to manage runway/airspace slot allocation in your state/region? At all airport/airspace? Please specify where. 2. How many flights are subject to the ATFM process? 3. How many en-route delay did the ATFM measure save in 2013? 4. How much airport arrival delay did the ATFM measures save in 2013? 5. Will strategic traffic flow management be used to manage runway/airspace slot allocation in your State/region by the end of 2018? At all airports/airspace? Please specify where? 6. How many flights will be. 33
Did someone asked you B0-RSEQ Improve Traffic flow through Runway Sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) Implementation Indicator: % of applicable international aerodromes having implemented AMAN / DMAN B0-WAKE Increased Runway Throughput through Optimized Wake Turbulence Separation Implementation Indicator: % of applicable international aerodromes having implemented increased runway throughput through optimized wake turbulence separation B0-FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Ground-Ground Integration Implementation Indicator: % of FIRs within which all applicable ACCs have implemented at least one interface to use AIDC / OLDI with neighbouring ACCs 34
How did you answer? B0-RSEQ Improve Traffic flow through Runway Sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) Implementation Indicator: % of applicable international aerodromes having implemented AMAN / DMAN B0-WAKE Increased Runway Throughput through Optimized Wake Turbulence Separation Implementation Indicator: % of applicable international aerodromes having implemented increased runway throughput through optimized wake turbulence separation B0-FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Ground-Ground Integration Implementation Indicator: % of FIRs within which all applicable ACCs have implemented at least one interface to use AIDC / OLDI with neighbouring ACCs 35
Definition: Modules vs Elements B0-RSEQ Improve Traffic flow through Runway Sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) Implementation Indicator: % of applicable international aerodromes having implemented AMAN / DMAN Set of airports For a specific airport, (Element Definition) AMAN via controlled time of arrival to a reference fix 36
Definition: Modules vs Elements B0-WAKE Increased Runway Throughput through Optimized Wake Turbulence Separation Implementation Indicator: % of applicable international aerodromes having implemented increased runway throughput through optimized wake turbulence separation Set of airports For a specific airport, (One Element Definition) Wake independent departure and arrival procedures for parallel runways with centrelines spaced less than 760 meters (2,500 feet) apart For a specific airport, (Another Element Definition) Wake turbulence mitigation for departures procedures for parallel runways with centrelines spaced less than 760 meters (2,500 feet) apart 37
Definition: Modules vs Elements B0-FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Ground- Ground Integration Implementation Indicator: % of FIRs within which all applicable ACCs have implemented at least one interface to use AIDC / OLDI with neighbouring ACCs AIDC to provide initial flight data to adjacent ATSUs AIDC to update previously coordinated flight data AIDC for control transfer AIDC to transfer CPDLC logon information to the Next Data Authority 38
Ask Different Questions B0-RSEQ Improve Traffic flow through Runway Sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) Question: % of applicable international aerodromes having implemented AMAN / DMAN Element: AMAN via controlled time of arrival to a reference fix Do you need this capability at particular airports? If yes, are you in planning phase or implementation phase? Did this capability implemented? 39
ASBU Element Analysis and Implementation Process Evaluate Elements one by one Understand environments Understand needs Understand status Prioritize Plan accordingly Reporting If fails Analysis Not Started 40
PIA 1 Block 0 Module Elements Table (with sample checks X ) 41
PIA 2 Block 0 Module Elements Table (with sample checks X ) 42
PIA 3 Block 0 Module Elements Table (with sample checks X ) 43
PIA 4 Block 0 Module Elements Table (with sample checks X ) 44
The No Country Left Behind (NCLB) campaign highlights ICAO s efforts to assist States in implementing ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs). The main goal of this work is to help ensure that SARP implementation is better harmonized globally so that all States have access to the significant socio-economic benefits of safe and reliable air transport. Many Analysis Not Started is an indication of trouble. 45
Implementation Planning Monitoring Reporting 46
Air Navigation Report Form (ANRF) Purpose Report the implementation status Report qualitative performance benefits Provide the progress status via web viewer Use the same report form for Regions and States One ANRF per module Specific focus on what will be reported 47
Qualitative Performance Benefits 5 out of 11 KPAs are selected for the ANRF Access/Equity Capacity Efficiency Environment Safety ANRF provides the qualitative benefit descriptions for each module ICAO expects States to provide data for the chosen metrics 48
Technology Roadmaps 1. Communication 3. Navigation 5. Avionics A/G Data comm Dedicated technology Communications G/G comm Performance-based Navigation Surveillance A/G voice comm Navigation 2. Surveillance 4. Information Management Aircraft safety nets Surface surveillance SWIM Onboard systems Ground-based surveillance A/A Surveillance Other 49
Summary of ASBU and ANP Understand ASBU B0 Elements Evaluate ASBU B0 Elements Use ANRF to plan/monitor/report State ANP 50
Put Together for your ANP Consider Regional eanp Volume III TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 0 Introduction Part I General Planning Aspects Part II Air Navigation System/ASBU Implementation Part III Air Navigation System/Regional Aviation System Improvement 51
Your possible ANP Part I Analysis and Implementation Workflow Status Indicator(s) for each ASBU Elements Status Indicator(s) for each State specific improvements Part II Status Table for each ASBU Elements Part III Explanation of State specific improvements Status (Table) for each State specific improvements Appendix ANRFs 52
Metrics and Target met rics (/ˈmetriks/) (noun) a method of measuring something, or the results obtained from this tar get (/ˈtärɡət/) (noun) a person, object, or place selected as the aim of an attack in di ca tor (/ˈindəˌkādər/) (noun) a thing, especially a trend or fact, that indicates the state or level of something 53
Sample Metrics and Target Aerodrome Centric Elements Block 0 Modules Elements Metrics Targets APTA 1. PBN Approach Procedures with vertical guidance (LPV, LNAV/VNAV minima, using SBAS and Baro VNAV Performance Improvement Area 1: Airport Operations a. Number of international aerodromes for which the need for this Element has been assessed = X. Metric: X out of 5* have been assessed b. Number of assessed international aerodromes which need this Element = Y Metric: Y out of X need this element c. Number of needed implementations that have been completed = Z Metric. Z out of Y have been completed B0-APTA-1 Target 1: X=5 by Dec 2016 * Assume that the State has 5 international aerodromes. 54
Block 0 Modules Sample Metrics and Target State Centric Elements Elements Metrics Targets FICE 1. AIDC to provide initial flight data to adjacent ATSUs Performance Improvement Area 1: Airport Operations a. Completed the need analysis for this Element Metric: 1 if assessed, 0 if not assessed b. Need this Element Metric: Y out of X States need this element Metric: 1 if needed, 0 if not needed c. Number of States where Element is needed that have completed implementation Metric: 1 if implemented, 0 if not implemented B0-FICE-1 Target 1: Need analysis completed by Dec 2016 55
Sample Metrics and Target Regional View Block 0 Modules Elements Metrics Targets FICE 1. AIDC to provide initial flight data to adjacent ATSUs Performance Improvement Area 1: Airport Operations a. Number of States that have completed the need analysis for this Element Metric: X out of 9* States have assessed b. Number of assessed States that need this Element Metric: Y out of X States need this element c. Completed implementation Metric: Z out of Y States have implemented B0-FICE-1 Target 1: X=9 by Dec 2016 * Assume that you have 9 State in your Region. 56
NAT NACC NAT Service Development Roadmap Regional Aviation System Improvement (RASI) Reduced Longitudinal Separation of 5 minutes between FANS equipped aircraft (RLongSM) Reduced Lateral Separation Minima between FANS equipped aircraft (RLatSM) and more NAM/CAR Regional Performance-Based Air Navigation Implementation Plan (RPBANIP) 57
ICAO Plans for Asia Pacific Regions Asia/Pacific Seamless ATM Plan Version 1.0, June 2013 Seamless ATM Implementation Guide Version 4.3, May 2014 [State] Seamless ATM Implementation Plan Template Version 3.0 58
APAN Regional Seamless ATM Reporting Form v4 42 entries (22 Regional and 20 ASBU Module/Element) 59
我们应该做什么? Chúng ta nên làm gì? Apa yang harus kita lakukan? ส งท เรา ควรทาอย างไร? どうしよう? 60
FAA Activities to Support ASBU Elements identification ASBU analysis and implementation process ANRF improvements and usage eanp Volume III NAM eanp NAT eanp Sharing information with other regions ASBU Workshops Collaboration with ICAO, CAAS, JCAB, and CANSO 61
Questions? Thank you! 62