GLOUCESTERSHIRE Cheltenham 2/1019 (C.23.6512) SO 95272332 98-100 EVESHAM ROAD, CHELTENHAM Archaeological Evaluation at 98-100 Evesham Road, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 14pp, figs, tabs, refs The site of the archaeological evaluation lay in close proximity to archaeological remains of Bronze Age, Iron Age and Romano-British date, which were poorly represented in Cheltenham. The evaluation recorded Romano-British ditches demonstrating signs of re-use that represented the continuation of field systems found nearby at Dunalley School and Rose Cottage. In addition, several discrete features of similar date were recorded. Finds included 3rd-4th century pottery and a burnt building stone.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: RO, MD 2/1020 (C.23.6554) SO 94402250 LAND TO THE SOUTH OF JESSOP AVENUE, CHELTENHAM Land to the south of Jessop Avenue, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Coleman, L Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 22pp, figs, tabs, refs The evaluation identified three wooden stakes, possibly representing a plot division. These were overlain by post-medieval features probably relating to the former railway sidings and metal works which formally occupied the eastern part of the study area. Other areas of the site were disturbed or overlain by deposits of 19th-century made ground, and produced no positive evidence for archaeological remains.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: PM, MO 2/1021 (C.23.6509) SO 95162331 WEST DRIVE AND WELLESLEY ROAD, CHELTENHAM, Archaeological Excavations at West Drive and Wellesley Road, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire Thomas, A & Catchpole, T Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 90pp, figs, tabs, refs The evaluation and excavation prior to the construction of the new Dunalley County Primary School revealed a rectilinear Romano-British system of stock enclosures or garden plots delineated to the east and south by a trackway. The layout was substantially changed in the late second century, after which it was subjected to slight modifications indicating ongoing maintenance until some time in the third century. A poorly preserved system of curvilinear enclosures was uncovered east of the trackway. No definite structures were identified, but the presence of building materials and quern fragments suggested the presence of a nearby settlement.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: RO 1
Cotswold 2/1022 (C.23.6534) SP 27801610 40 VICTORIA ROAD, CIRENCESTER 40 Victoria Road, Cirencester, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Saunders, M J Reading : Thames Valley Archaeological Services, 2000, 10pp, Work undertaken by: Thames Valley Archaeological Services The excavation revealed the presence of a well of post-medieval date, together with a number of deposits representing periodic episodes of dumping on the site, two of which appeared to represent Roman demolition layers. No in situ structural remains or road surfaces dating to the Roman period were identified.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: RO, PM 2/1023 (C.23.6009) SP 02280244 10 & 12 HEREWARD ROAD, CIRENCESTER 10 & 12 Hereward Road, Cirencester, Gloucestershire. Archaeological Evaluation (Report No. 001128) Hart, J Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 14pp, The evaluation was undertaken in order to inform the planning authority of the advisability of granting consent for the construction of a single storey extension to the existing properties. The site lay outside of the line of the Roman town walls but within the historic precinct of the medieval Abbey. An in situ surface, provisionally dated to the 12th to 13th centuries, was encountered at between 1.23m and 1.32m below the existing ground level. It was overlain by a rubble deposit from which a single medieval coin was recovered. It was possible that these remains were associated with the farm which belonged to the medieval Abbey, several buildings of which were known to have been located within a few metres of the study area. [Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: MD, PM 2/1024 (C.23.6530) SP 02220164 11 ST PETER'S ROAD, CIRENCESTER 11 St Peter's Road, Cirencester, Gloucestershire Cotswold Archaeological Trust Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 13pp, The evaluation identified a former topsoil horizon and later ground make-up probably associated with the construction of the existing house in the late nineteenth century. No in-situ Roman deposits were encountered.[au] Archaeological periods represented: RO, MD 2/1025 (C.23.6564) SP 02500250 15 ASHCROFT GARDENS, CIRENCESTER 15 Ashcroft Gardens, Cirencester, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Test Pit Evaluation Nash, G Leominster : Border Archaeology, 2000, 20pp,colour pls, Work undertaken by: Border Archaeology 2
Of the two trenches excavated during the evaluation, Trench 2 revealed substantial archaeological remains including a large stone wall. This wall and its associated deposits were considered to be highly significant to the Roman fabric of Cirencester; especially when considering that the Roman bath house and a series of private dwellings with mosaics were found within 50 metres of the site.[au] Archaeological periods represented: RO, PM 2/1026 (C.23.6533) SP 02640162 20 CHESTER STREET, CIRENCESTER 20 Chester Street, Cirencester, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Thomas, A Gloucester : Alan Thomas, 2000, 8pp, colour pls, Work undertaken by: Alan Thomas The archaeological evaluation comprised a single test pit which subsequently revealed a post-medieval surface. Excavation ceased at this point as foundations for a conservatory could be accommodated within the overlying overburden.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: RO, MD 2/1027 (C.23.6529) SP 02760182 23 VICTORIA ROAD, CIRENCESTER 23 Victoria Road, Cirencester, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Cotswold Archaeological Trust Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 37pp, figs, tabs, refs During the evaluation a Roman street surface was identified in two of the trenches, as well as in-situ walls and surfaces. The walls and cobbles of a 19th-century nursery estate buildings as well as a substantial accumulation of probable nursery soils were also observed during the evaluation.[au] Archaeological periods represented: RO, MD, PM 2/1028 (C.23.6002) SP 02780161 40 VICTORIA ROAD, CIRENCESTER 40 VIctoria Road, Cirencester, Gloucestershire. Archaeological Evaluation Saunders, M J Reading : Thames Valley Archaeological Services, 2000, 12pp, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Thames Valley Archaeological Services A single 1.54m by 1.2m trial trench was excavated as an evaluation following the submission of a planning application. A post-medieval well cutting, presumed to be Roman demolition deposits were revealed. [Au(adp)] Archaeological periods represented: RO, PM 2/1029 (C.23.6531) SP 28441544 91 VICTORIA ROAD, CIRENCESTER 91 Victoria Road, Cirencester, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Cotswold Archaeological Trust Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 15pp, colour pls, 3
A layer of Roman demolition debris was identified which overlaid a compacted gravel surface which may have represented a surface within an outbuilding or an exterior yard. A Roman roof tile as well as wall plaster were also found within the deposit. No evidence of disturbance to the Roman deposits by later activity was identified.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: RO 2/1030 (C.23.6569) SP 02290178 ASHCROFT CENTRE, ASHCROFT ROAD, CIRENCESTER Ashcroft Centre, Ashcroft Road, Cirencester, Gloucestershire: Archaeological Evaluation Cotswold Archaeological Trust Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 13pp, The stratigraphic sequence identified during the course of the evaluation indicated that in-situ Roman deposits survived at a depth of 0.85 metres below the modern ground surface. Deposits (008) and (007) were consistent with late Roman demolition debris previously identified throughout the town, and were broadly dated to the fourth century AD.[Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: RO, PM 2/1031 (C.23.6539) SP 02780136 BINGHAM HALL, KING STREET, CIRENCESTER Bingham Hall, King Street, Cirencester, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Cotswold Archaeological Trust Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 14pp, The proposed development lay within an area of high archaeological sensitivity within the historic core of the Roman town of Corinium Dobunurum. A Roman street was recorded during the evaluation as well as a large number of ceramic drains.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: RO 2/1032 (C.23.6559) SP 09803850 SP 13803530 BROADWAY TO FIVE MILE DRIVE NATURAL GAS PIPELINE Broadway (Worcestershire) to Five Mile Drive (Gloucestershire) Natural Gas Pipeline: An Archaeological Evaluation Cotswold Archaeological Trust Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 19pp, Limited archaeological features were revealed by trial trenching along the pipeline route. These consisted of four undated pits immediately to the south of Buckle Street (formerly a Roman road). No other archaeological features or deposits were observed.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: RO, UD 2/1033 (C.23.6526) SP 17442055 BURY BARN COTTAGE, BOURTON-ON-THE-WATER Archaeological Evaluation at Bury Barn Cottage, Bourton-on-the-Water, Gloucestershire Bashford, L Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 10pp, figs, tabs, refs 4
The evaluation established that the western (inner) bank of Salmonsbury had been extensively truncated in the area of the evaluation and possibly along the length of the site. None of the bank visibly survived on the site, having been cut away in the 19th-century when farm buildings were constructed against the western boundary. The evaluation also indicated that the eastern edge of the Iron Age bank was preserved immediately below the existing turf and tarmac. Therefore any ground intrusion in that area would damage archaeological deposits of national significance. The inner ditch of Salmonsbury was also found to be well preserved where it had not been built over in the recent past. Ground intrusions greater than 0.3 metres over the majority of the site would also damage archaeological deposits of national significance.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: IA, PM 2/1034 (C.23.6513) SP 24472247 CHURCH LANE CEMETERY, BLEDINGTON An Archaeological Evaluation at Church Lane Cemetery, Bledington, Gloucestershire Nichols, P Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 8pp, The archaeological evaluation at Church Lane Cemetery recorded two ditches and post holes. All features were heavily truncated by later ploughing. Ditch 11 contained burnt clay which may have come from a hearth. No dateable artefacts were retrieved and it was not possible to establish the date of the features.[au] Archaeological periods represented: UD 2/1035 (C.23.6527) SP 03601852 GLEBE FARM, SHIPTON OLIFFE An Archaeological Evaluation at Glebe Farm, Shipton Oliffe, Gloucestershire Derham, K Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 8pp, No archaeological features or deposits were recorded during the evaluation.[au] 2/1036 (C.23.6521) SP 16222110 GREEN LAKE PLAYING FIELD, BOURTON-ON-THE-WATER An Archaeological Evaluation at Green Lake Playing Field, Bourton-on-the-Water, Gloucestershire Nichols, P Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 16pp, figs, tabs, refs The evaluation established the presence of significant archaeological deposits of Romano-British date along the whole length of the proposed water pipe. A wall, three ditches and deposits down to a depth of at least 2 metres below ground level were recorded and were provisionally dated to the 3rd-4th century.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: RO 5
2/1037 (C.23.6528) SP 08140153 IVESON HOUSE, AMPNEY, CIRENCESTER Land at Iveson House, Ampney St Peter, Cirencester Marches Archaeology Lyonshall : Marches Archaeology, 2000, 13pp, Work undertaken by: Marches Archaeology A layer interpreted as a former topsoil dating to the 12th - 13th-centuries was revealed during the course of the evaluation. A mortar spread overlying the former topsoil was undated. A large cut in the eastern end of the trench was probably excavated in the 19th or 20th-century.[Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: MD, PM 2/1038 (C.23.6500) SP 10841489 JUBILEE CAFE, NORTHLEACH An Archaeological Evaluation at the Former Jubilee Cafe, Northleach, Gloucestershire Bashford, L Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 7pp, The Jubilee Cafe site lay adjacent to the Roman Fosse Way, where the potential for associated Roman roadside features was thought to be high. However, the three trial trenches revealed that the lower part of the site had been truncated and subsequently built-up in the post-medieval and modern periods.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: PM, UD 2/1039 (C.23.6562) SU 21329968 KENT PLACE, SHERBORNE STREET, LECHLADE Kent Place, Sherborne Street, Lechlade, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Cotswold Archaeological Trust Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 19pp, A range of archaeological features were identified during the evaluation. Features included a substantial ditch, a burnt feature (possibly a hearth), a large stone-packed post hole, and several other cut features of unknown function. A small number of sherds of Anglo-Saxon pottery were also recovered, which may have originated from the Anglo-Saxon site previously excavated a short distance to the north-west of the site.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: EM, MD 2/1040 (C.23.6540) SP 03050114 LAND ADJACENT TO 157 WATERMOOR ROAD, CIRENCESTER Land Adjacent to 157 Watermoor Road, Cirencester, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Cotswold Archaeological Trust Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 13pp, The archaeological evaluation revealed at least six Romano-British inhumation burials. It was likely that the site lay within the area occupied by the late Roman extra-mural cemetery, a short distance outside the Silchester Gate of Roman Corinium.[Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: RO 6
2/1041 (C.23.6536) SP 21300036 LAND ADJACENT TO 2 THE CURSUS, LECHLADE Land Adjacent to 2, The Cursus, Lechlade, Gloucestershire Cotswold Archaeological Trust Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 18pp, figs, tabs, refs The evaluation identified a ditch of the monument known as the Lechlade Cursus in the anticipated location as well as another prehistoric ditch. No archaeological features were found on the site of the proposed dwelling.[au] Archaeological periods represented: LPR 2/1042 (C.23.6560) SP 17002090 LAND ADJACENT TO APRIL RISE, STATION ROAD, BOURTON-ON-THE- WATER Land Adjacent to April Rise, Station Road, Bourton-on-the-Water, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Barber, A & Williams, J Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 14pp, The excavation of an evaluation trench perpendicular to the postulated line of the inner ditched defences of Salmonsbury Camp revealed no archaeological features predating the early-modern period. A gravel quarry-pit was partially revealed and a number of early bottles, jars and other domestic refuse were retrieved from its infill. Although significant archaeological remains were known to lie in the vicinity of the study area, the archaeological evaluation detected no evidence for prehistoric, Romano- British or later occupation in the area sampled.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: MO 2/1043 (C.23.6558) SP 16852070 LAND ADJACENT TO LLOYDS BANK, HIGH STREET, BOURTON-ON-THE- WATER Land Adjacent to Lloyds Bank, High Street, Bourton-on-the-Water, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Cotswold Archaeological Trust Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 11pp, The site of the evaluation lay within the historic core of Bourton and within close proximity of Salmondsbury Camp (SAM 99), which dated to the Iron Age. Four small trenches were mechanically excavated. A small subrectangular pit was revealed which contained post-medieval domestic refuse. No other features or finds of archaeological interest were revealed during the excavation of the remaining trenches.[au] Archaeological periods represented: PM 2/1044 (C.23.6547) SP 21500005 LAND ADJOINING THE MAPLES, OAK STREET, LECHLADE Land Adjoining The Maples, Oak Street, Lechlade, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Brett, M Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 17pp, figs, tabs, refs 7
The evaluation was successful in identifying a large ditch, post holes and a pit which were all thought to date from the later prehistoric period. The discovery of these features was not unexpected as they fitted in with an emerging pattern of activity already identified in Lechlade.[Au] Archaeological periods represented: IA, LPR 2/1045 (C.23.6543) SP 03700280 LAND AT HAREBUSHES, CIRENCESTER Land at Harebushes, Cirencester, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Cotswold Archaeological Trust Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 11pp, The evaluation comprised four mechanically excavated trenches totalling 120 metres in length. An area of post-medieval infill, probably related to quarrying activity was identified. No further archaeological features or deposits were recorded.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: PM 2/1046 (C.23.6001) ST 76678985 LAND AT HILLESLEY FARM, HILLESLEY Archaeological Evaluation on Land at Hillesley Farm, Hillesley, Gloucestershire (650/2000) Bristol and Region Archaeological Services Bristol : Bristol and Region Archaeological Services, 2000, 32pp, colour pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Bristol and Region Archaeological Services The evaluation, which consisted of the excavation of six trial trenches, revealed a number of archaeological features lying within the proposed development area, with archaeological deposits in all of the trenches excavated. The earliest features were undated, whilst a putative buried soil horizon suggested the existence of an 11 th -12 th century field system, previously recorded during an excavation by BaRAS to the east of the site in 1997. A bank and ditch structure appeared to relate to later postmedieval changes to field boundaries. [Au(adp)] Archaeological periods represented: MD, PM, UD 2/1047 (C.23.6006) SP 02580114 LAND AT SCHOOL LANE/STEPSTAIRS LANE, CIRENCESTER Land at School Lane/Stepstairs Lane, Cirencester, Gloucestershire. Archaeological Evaluation (Report No. 001223) Hart, J Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 20pp, figs, tabs, refs The evaluation was undertaken on the site prior to the proposed construction of a three-storey block of flats. Features dating to the early Roman occupation of the town were identified in both trenches. These features had been sealed by a mid 2 nd -century 'dark earth' layer that had protected them from subsequent truncation by development during the 19 th century and the 1970's. [Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: RO, UD 2/1048 (C.23.6550) SP 11302466 SP 11282147 LAND TO THE REAR OF THE WHEATSHEAF HOTEL, NORTHLEACH 8
Land at the rear of The Wheatsheaf Hotel, Northleach, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Kenyon, D Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 9pp, figs No archaeological features of interest were identified during the course of the evaluation. Natural limestone brash was encountered below the garden soil.[au(abr)] 2/1049 (C.23.6544) SU 21800010 LECHLADE MANOR, LECHLADE-ON-THAMES Lechlade Manor, Lechlade-on-Thames, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Assessment Longman, T Bristol : Bristol and Region Archaeological Services, 2000, 30pp, Work undertaken by: Bristol and Region Archaeological Services The excavation revealed evidence of Iron Age and Romano-British occupation, comprising a ditch and an infant inhumation burial, probable Anglo-Saxon agricultural activity, earthworks associated with medieval crofts and ridge and furrow, also post-medieval ditches associated with the manorial estate.[au] Archaeological periods represented: IA, PR, RO, EM, MD, PM 2/1050 (C.23.6552) SP 03700250 LONDON ROAD, CIRENCESTER London Road, Cirencester, Gloucestershire: A Geophysical Survey Samuels, J Normanton-on-Trent : John Samuels Archaeological Consultants, 2000, 39pp, figs Work undertaken by: John Samuels Archaeological Consultants The survey successfully identified the limits of the refuse tip, along with the possible boundary that formed the limit of the landfill site. A number of anomalies of archaeological interest were also identified. These included part of an enclosure, a possible ring ditch and numerous pit type responses. A broad linear feature, potentially a Roman road, with possible evidence for industrial activity adjacent to it was also identified. However, given that the site area was used as a compound during the construction of the A419 road, it was more likely that these responses related to this modern disturbance.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: RO, UD 2/1051 (C.23.6008) SU 40231943 LOWER MILL FARM, SOMERFORD KEYNES Lower Mill Farm, Somerford Keynes, Gloucestershire. Archaeological Evaluation (Report No. 001240) Thomas, A & Collard, M Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 21pp, figs, tabs, refs 12 trial trenches were excavated as an evaluation of the site. The northern half of the study area was found to contain archaeological deposits, however, any in the southern half were likely to have been destroyed by the construction of an embankment around a former gravel quarry now filled by Somerford Lagoon. Two trenches produced evidence of Romano-British activity in the form of shallow pits, gullies and ditches. The presence of roof tile fragments suggested the presence of a Romano- British building, possibly of some status, either within or in the vicinity of the site. Archaeological features were also identified in four other trenches and, although none produced any dateable artefacts, it was possible that they were also of Romano-British date. Two possible palaeochannels and two post- 9
medieval ditches were also found. It was clear from previous archaeological work that the study area lay within a landscape extensively utilised for settlement and agriculture during the Iron Age and Romano-British periods. The identification of further archaeological remains from within the study area had the potential to significantly add to the understanding of these settlement patterns and land use. [Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: RO, PM, UD 2/1052 (C.23.6514) SP 14823896 PARK ROAD, CHIPPING CAMPDEN An Archaeological Evaluation at Park Road, Chipping Campden, Gloucestershire Nichols, P Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 9pp, The archaeological evaluation at Park Road recorded alluvial deposits of post-medieval date. No archaeological deposits or finds were recorded within the evaluation trenches. The presence of alluvial deposits may explain the apparent absence of medieval development within the area, and it could be that the site was not developed due to its susceptibility to flooding. Alternatively the site may have been outside the developed area of Chipping Campden during the medieval period.[au] Archaeological periods represented: MO 2/1053 (C.23.6508) SP 02530150 PATERNOSTER SCHOOL, WATERMOOR ROAD, CIRENCESTER An Archaeological Excavation at Paternoster School, Watermoor Road, Cirencester, Gloucestershire Nichols, P Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 10pp, figs, tabs, refs An archaeological excavation of post holes was carried out at Paternoster School. The excavation established the presence of probable Romano-British demolition deposits in post holes 1, 2 and 3 and a deposit which may have been the remains of a Romano-British surface, but which was more likely to have been a post-medieval deposit.[au] Archaeological periods represented: RO, PM, MO 2/1054 (C.23.6005) SP 03801847 SHIPTON OLIFFE MANOR, SHIPTON OLIFFE Shipton Oliffe Manor, Shipton Oliffe, Gloucestershire. Archaeological Evaluation (Report No. 001225) Hart, J Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 16pp, The evaluation was undertaken following an application for planning consent to construct a two-storey extension to the rear of the existing property and for an extension to the existing garage block and the formation of a pool enclosure. Three trenches were hand-excavated to the top of the archaeological deposits. A Roman ditch as well as 19th century walls and surfaces were identified. [Au(adp)] Archaeological periods represented: RO, PM 10
2/1055 (C.23.6538) SP 02330210 ST JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH CHURCH, CIRENCESTER St John The Baptist Parish Church, Cirencester, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Cotswold Archaeological Trust Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 39pp, figs, tabs, refs The archaeological evaluation identified inhumations and associated grave structures, mostly dating from the 19th century. A surface of possible medieval date was also identified; graves cutting this surface were considered to be medieval in date. In all areas along the north and east side of the church, the proposed works would impact on either in-situ human remains or structures associated with them.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: MD, PM 2/1056 (C.23.6519) SP 10823970 ST PETER'S CHURCH, WILLERSEY An Archaeological Evaluation at Land Adjacent to St Peter's Church, Willersey, Gloucestershire Derham, K Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 7pp, The evaluation on land adjacent to St Peter's Church revealed an undated bank at the eastern limit of the site which appeared to be associated with a field boundary and drainage ditch to the immediate east.[au] Archaeological periods represented: UD 2/1057 (C.23.6520) SP 02130165 ST PETER'S COURT, CIRENCESTER An Archaeological Evaluation at St Peter's Court, Cirencester, Gloucestershire Bashford, L Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 7pp, St Peter's Court lay on or close to the alignment of Roman Cirencester's town defences, and had the potential for survival of Roman remains. One trench was excavated, revealing that the site had deep deposits which had been built up in the post-medieval and modern period.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: MO 2/1058 (C.23.6551) SP 15003640 STANLEY'S QUARRY, BROCKLEY Stanley's Quarry, Brockley, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Thomas, A Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 9pp, figs No archaeological features were identified during the course of the evaluation, nor was there any artefactual evidence recovered from the trenches. The evaluation demonstrated the absence of archaeological remains within the study area.[au(abr)] 11
2/1059 (C.23.6504) SP 16652115 THE COTSWOLD SCHOOL, BOURTON-ON-THE-WATER An Archaeological Excavation at The Cotswold School, Bourton-On-The Water, Gloucestershire Nichols, P Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 13pp, figs, tabs, refs An archaeological excavation was carried out in advance of an extension to the sixth form block. The excavation established the presence of a single post-hole of prehistoric date, three post holes which may date to the same period and a furrow aligned north-south. The excavated area had been severely truncated by service trenches and drainage for the school buildings.[au] Archaeological periods represented: PR, RO, MD, PM 2/1060 (C.23.6522) ST 88819346 THE FORMER BRADFIELD GARAGE, HAMPTON STREET, TETBURY An Archaeological Evaluation at The Former Bradfield Garage, Hampton Street, Tetbury, Gloucestershire Derham, K Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 7pp, The evaluation recorded three drystone culverts of probable post-medieval date in the south-west and north of the development area. The absence of subsoil in the trenches nearest to the former fore-court of Bradfield Gararge may indicate that this area had been heavily truncated during its construction.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: MD 2/1061 (C.23.6553) SP 02010190 THE OLD MUSEUM, TETBURY ROAD, CIRENCESTER The Old Museum, Tetbury Road, Cirencester, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Coleman, L Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 14pp, The proposed development area was located in an archaeologically sensitive area, lying on or near to the defences of the Roman town. A surface and wall representing a possible garden and architectual feature and dating to the post-medieval period were encountered at a depth of 1.4 metres below the exsiting ground surface.[au] Archaeological periods represented: RO, PM 2/1062 (C.23.6515) ST 89059333 THE PRIORY, TETBURY An Archaeological Evaluation at The Priory, Tetbury, Gloucestershire Nichols, P Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 12pp, The evaluation at The Priory established the presence of a wall and a cobbled floor surface. Pottery associated with the wall and surface suggested a 19th century date for the structure. The building may 12
be shown on the tithe map of 1839, but the building on the tithe map looked different in plan, and may be an earlier structure on the same site.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: MD, PM 2/1063 (C.23.6532) SP 24203630 TODHATCH, 2 TODENHAM, TODENHAM Todhatch, 2 Todenham, Todenham, Gloucestershire Border Archaeology Leominster : Border Archaeology, 2000, 15pp, colour pls, Work undertaken by: Border Archaeology The evaluation did not reveal any significant archaeological features or structures. Artefacts recovered from the upper stratigraphy were typical of garden soil contexts, however, they were not retained.[au(abr)] 2/1064 (C.23.6007) SS 02450136 TRINITY ROAD, CIRENCESTER Trinity Road, Cirencester, Gloucestershire. Archaeological Evaluation (Report No. 001265) Brett, M Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 17pp, The evaluation was undertaken prior to the proposed construction of an electricity substation and laying of associated cables. The proposed development lay within a notification area of SAM (Glos. 3661), close to the projected line of the defensive wall of the Roman town of Corinium. A possible Roman limestone mortar floor was revealed at 0.5m below existing ground level, underlain by further deposits dating to the Roman period. These included layers of rubble possibly representing the early town defences which originated as a large bank and ditch encompassing the town, built around the end of the first/middle of the second century AD. [Au(adp)] Archaeological periods represented: RO 2/1065 (C.23.6507) SP 19462572 UNION STREET, STOW-ON-THE-WOLD An Archaeological Evaluation at Union Street, Stow-on-the-Wold, Gloucestershire Derham, K Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 8pp, The evaluation carried out at Union Street revealed part of a possible limestone quarry and a north-west to south-east oriented stone wall foundation. The foundation was interpreted as a possible internal wall of the demolished Stow-on-the-Wold Union Workhouse. The absence of datable evidence from the foundations prevented definate interpretation and it remained that they may relate to an earlier structure.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: UD 2/1066 (C.23.6537) SP 17152105 WOODLANDS HOUSE, BOURTON-ON-THE-WATER Woodlands House, Bourton-on-the-Water, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Cotswold Archaeological Trust Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 15pp, 13
No archaeological deposits or features were encountered during the evaluation. A broadly analagous sequence of modern deposits were identified in both test pits.[au] Archaeological periods represented: RO Forest of Dean 2/1067 (C.23.6003) ST 63606480 LAND ADJACENT TO PLUMMERS BROOK, LYDNEY Land Adjacent to Plummers Brook, Lydney, Gloucestershire. Archaeological Evaluation Report Holmes, A Oxford : Oxford Archaeological Unit, 2000, 21pp, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Oxford Archaeological Unit An archaeological evaluation, consisting of the excavation of seventeen trenches, was undertaken. The evaluation revealed a sequence of alluvial deposits and an area of industrial waste used to fill marshland adjacent to the railway. The bottom of the alluvial sequence was not detected as it lay beneath the level of the proposed impact; the deepest section observed was 2.2m deep and this revealed a fairly homogenous alluvial accumulation. A watercourse located in the centre of the site contained twigs, roots and a possible stake fence line was also uncovered. The stakes could not be precisely dated, although they predated the 19th century. Medieval cultivation in the form of ridge-and-furrow was visible in the west of the proposed development area with an associated ploughsoil beneath the topsoil. A small number of post-medieval pottery sherds were found within the ploughsoil and a redeposited Roman sherd in the industrial deposits to the north-east. [Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: RO, PM, UD 2/1068 (C.23.6517) SO 62900280 LYDNEY INSTITUTE, LYDNEY An Archaeological Excavation on the site of the former Lydney Institute, Lydney, Gloucestershire Vallender, J Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 40pp, figs, tabs, refs Archaeological evidence of medieval Lydney was confirmed by the excavation on the site of the demolished Lydney Institute. Medieval activity on the site, including metal working was also apparent. The presence of Roman type bloomery slag suggested that it was re-used as fuel for the adjacent blast furnace, although metal working similar in nature to the Roman processes may have continued in the immediate area. Significant deposits and features of post-medieval date were also recorded, these were thought to have been associated with the large scale iron workings on the adjacent site of Lydney furnace.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: RO, MD, PM 2/1069 (C.23.6505) SO 79412323 MOOR END, HARTPURY COLLEGE, HARTPURY An Archaeological Evaluation at Moor End, Hartpury College, Hartpury, Gloucestershire Bashford, L Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 8pp, 14
The archaeological evaluation of land at Hartpury College comprised the excavation of five trenches alongside the proposed alterations to the college access roads. A hollow way was recorded along with possible prehistoric ring gullies.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: PR, PM, MO, UD 2/1070 (C.23.6549) SO 63050312 RAGLAN HOUSE, STANFORN ROAD, LYDNEY Raglan House, Stanford Road, Lydney, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Kenyon, D Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 11pp, During the archaeological evaluation post-medieval garden features, in the form of tree or shrubplanting pits were observed. However, no earlier archaeological features of interest were identified.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: PM Gloucester 2/1071 (C.23.6516) SO 87631753 HUCCLECOTE CENTRE, HUCCLECOTE, GLOUCESTER An Archaeological Evaluation at The Hucclecote Centre, Hucclecote, Gloucester, Gloucestershire Derham, K Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 9pp, figs, tabs No archaeological features or deposits were revealed during the evaluation. An iron pipe and a ceramic field drain were recorded and may have represented a linear anomoly recorded in the 1995 geophysical survey to the immediate north of the proposed development site.[au] Archaeological periods represented: PM 2/1072 (C.23.6566) SO 81191530 LAND ADJACENT TO DAVILLIAN COURT, WOOLSTROP WAY Land Adjacent to Davillian Court, Woolstrop Way, Quedgeley, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Cotswold Archaeological Trust Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 8pp, During the course of the evaluation three trenches totalling 42 metres in length were mechanically excavated. Ash deposits probably associated with the former use of the site as a forge were encountered below the current turf layer in parts of the site, overlying the natural clay. No features of archaeological interest were identified.[au] Archaeological periods represented: MO 2/1073 (C.23.6524) SO 85611985 PAYGROVE LANE, LONGLEVENS Archaeological Evaluation of Land Adjacent to Paygrove Lane, Longlevens, Gloucester 15
Bashford, L Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 11pp, figs, tabs, refs The evaluation did not identify any archaeological remains worth preserving in situ. Ridge and furrow had heavily truncated any earlier features. However, if the medieval pottery and possible Romano- British pottery were not the result of midden spreading, there was a possibility that early features, such as the possible ditch, survived on the ridges.[au] Archaeological periods represented: MD 2/1074 (C.23.6510) SO 84321919 POSY LANE, GLOUCESTER An Archaeological Evaluation at Posy Lane, Gloucester, Gloucestershire Nichols, P Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 8pp, The archaeological evaluation at Posy Lane identified a possible feature of uncertain date and sherds of pottery dating from the Romano-British and post-medieval periods. The feature was very irregular in plan and was interpreted as being the result of post-medieval agricultural use of the site. [Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: RO, PM Stroud 2/1075 (C.23.6541) ST 75509830 60 PARSONAGE STREET, DURSLEY 60 Parsonage Street, Dursley, Gloucestershire: A Report on an Archaeological Evaluation Wainwright, J Lyonshall : Marches Archaeology, 2000, 12pp, fifs, refs Work undertaken by: Marches Archaeology The evaluation revealed medieval accumulation or cultivation layers. A series of cut features were also uncovered which were interpreted as pits. In the second trench an infilled post-medieval stone cellar was recorded.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: MD, PM 2/1076 (C.23.6525) SO 84960546 BEECHES GREEN, STROUD An Archaeological Evaluation at Beeches Green, Stroud, Gloucestershire Derham, K Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 8pp, The archaeological evaluation recorded no archaeological features or deposits.[aip] 2/1077 (C.23.6518) ST 75489820 CASTLE STREET, DURSLEY An Archaeological Evaluation at The Proposed Library, Castle Street, Dursley, Gloucestershire 16
Derham, K Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 9pp, The evaluation recorded successive layers of post-medieval levelling and demolition deposits in excess of 2.3 metres deep across the whole of the development area. Archaeological deposits, features or natural deposits were not revealed due to the depth of the overlying post-medieval deposits.[au] Archaeological periods represented: PM 2/1078 (C.23.6565) SO 89951425 GREAT WITCOMBE ROMAN VILLA Great Witcombe Roman Villa, Gloucestershire: A Study of its Fabric and Environs Cotswold Archaeological Trust Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 121pp, figs, tabs, refs The field survey demonstrated that the villa posessed a second, lower, courtyard which lay beyond the bounds of the Guardianship Area. This discovery clarified that the Great Witcombe villa attested to the style of the double-courtyard villas of the Cotswolds. The villa can be shown to have been set within a landscape of subsidiary buildings, and probable industrial activity. Tile wasters were found in the stream bed, and the magnetometry survey detected areas of debris with strong magnetic responses reminiscent of kilns and hearths to the south and north-east of the villa.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: RO 2/1079 (C.23.6557) ST 76678985 HILLESLEY FARM, HILLESLEY Archaeological Evaluation on land at Hillesley Farm, Hillesley, Gloucestershire Bristol and Region Archaeological Services Bristol : Bristol and Region Archaeological Services, 2000, 31pp, colour pls, Work undertaken by: Bristol and Region Archaeological Services The evaluation revealed a number of archaeological features lying within the proposed development area, with archaeological deposits in all of the trenches excavated. The earliest feature was undated, whilst a putative buried soil horizon suggested the existence of an 11th to 12th century field system. A bank and ditch structure appeared to relate to later post-medieval changes to field boundaries.[au] Archaeological periods represented: PM, UD 2/1080 (C.23.6563) SO 77850550 LAND ADJOINING SPRINGFIELD, SPRINGHILL, EASTINGTON Results of an Archaeological Evaluation Excavation on Land adjoining Springfield, Springhill, Eastington, Gloucestershire Young, J Normanton-on-Trent : John Samuels Archaeological Consultants, 2000, 20pp, colour pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: John Samuels Archaeological Consultants No sites or finds of archaeological importance were recorded within the proposed development site.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: PM 17
2/1081 (C.23.6555) ST 75619358 ST 75829330 LAND TO THE REAR OF 17-19 CHURCH STREET AND 9B LONG STREET, WOTTON-UNDER-EDGE Land to the rear of 17-19 Church Street, Wotton-under-Edge, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Tavener, N Lyonshall : Marches Archaeology, 2000, 19pp, Work undertaken by: Marches Archaeology The proposed development site lay within the historic core of Wotton-under-Edge. Documentary evidence indicated the establishment of a new, formal planned 'borough' sometime after 1252. The evaluation comprised of two trenches neither of which appeared to be located within areas of intense medieval activity. The only archaeological remains of any significance were two wall footings representing the south east corner of a building of late 17th century date. An outbuilding was shown at this location on the Berkely Castle Estate map of 1763. Later map evidence indicated that it was demolished prior to 1876.[Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: MD, PM, UD 2/1082 (C.23.6556) SO 80200330 PRIORY FARM, LEONARD STANLEY Priory Farm, Leonard Stanley, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Young, D & Erskine J G P Bristol : Avon Archaeological Unit, 2000, 43pp, colour pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Avon Archaeological Unit During the evaluation, masonary foundations of a major building were located associated with pottery and building material from the 13th to14th centuries. No function or complete ground plan was recovered, but it was conjecture that these foundations could represent buildings associated with the 12th century St Leonard's Priory. These early foundations had been robbed out and replaced on a similar line by another building, possibly of the early post-medieval period. The last phase of construction was represented by demolished walls and a cobbled floor and the base of a cider press. This building was known to have existed from the early 19th century and had been demolished within the memory of a previous owner of Priory Farm.[Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: MD, PM, MO, UD Tewkesbury 2/1083 (C.23.6561) SO 90702930 2 LLANTHONY COTTAGES, TREDINGTON 2 Llanthony Cottages, Tredington, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Mayer, D Swindon : Foundations Archaeology, 2000, 10pp, Work undertaken by: Foundations Archaeology The evaluation comprised the excavation and recording of one trench in which no archaeological features or deposits were identified.[au] 2/1084 (C.23.6542) SO 88201730 BROCKWORTH MSA Brockworth MSA, Gloucestershire: An Archaeological Evaluation Cotswold Archaeological Trust Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 45pp, figs, tabs, refs 18
The evaluation revealed two post holes which may have represented part of a structure associated with a Bronze Age funerary site. In addition a Romano-British site, in the form of enclosures, a possible trackway and ditches formed the continuation of a rural settlement of first to fourth century date. A possible ring ditch was also identified. Much of the site also contained evidence for a medieval agricultural regime in the form of ridge amd furrow ploughing and field boundaries.[au] Archaeological periods represented: BA, RO, MD 2/1085 (C.23.6545) SO 95602825 DEAN FARM, BISHOPS CLEEVE Dean Farm, Bishop Cleeve, Gloucestershire: A Geophysical Survey Report Samuels, J Normanton-on-Trent : John Samuels Archaeological Consultants, 2000, 14pp, figs Work undertaken by: John Samuels Archaeological Consultants The survey succeeded in identifying a complex of archaeological features. The results indicated a series of ditched enclosures, a possible trackway and several pit-like responses. It was evident that the core of the site occupied a 40 metre wide band that exteneded across the survey area. However, considerable noise had been introduced to the data because of the ploughed and rutted ground, which resulted in the loss of detail in certain areas of the field. However, this did not detract from defining the extent of the core settlement.[au] Archaeological periods represented: IA, UD 2/1086 (C.23.6000) SP 04802993 HOME ORCHARD COTTAGE, HAILES Home Orchard Cottage, Hailes, Gloucestershire. Archaeological Evaluation (001130) Brett, M Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 14pp, An archaeological evaluation was undertaken prior to the determination of a planning application. A single 1.5m square test pit was excavated. A substantial layer of alluvial build-up was encountered, a process which appeared to have begun in the medieval period. [Au(adp)] Archaeological periods represented: UD 2/1087 (C.23.6568) SO 94652785 LAND AT MALVERN VIEW BUSINESS PARK Land at Malvern View Business Park, Bishops Cleeve, Gloucestershire: Archaeological Evaluation Cotswold Archaeological Trust Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 13pp, figs, tabs, refs During the course of the evaluation a series of post-medieval field drains were encountered and the vestigal remains of ridge and furrow cultivation were identified. No earlier features of archaeological significance were uncovered.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: MD, PM, MO 19
2/1088 (C.23.6535) SP 02452830 ST MARY'S, COWL LANE, WINCHCOMBE St Mary's, Cowl Lane, Winchcombe, Gloucestershire Cotswold Archaeological Trust Kemble : Cotswold Archaeological Trust, 2000, 15pp, figs, tabs,refs The archaeological evaluation comprised an excavation of two trenches of which both contained a similar sequence of deposits dating from the medieval period to modern day. No significant archaeological features were observed.[aip] Archaeological periods represented: PM, MO 2/1089 (C.23.6511) SO 91171699 THE ELMS, BENTHAM An Archaeological Evaluation at The Elms, Bentham, Gloucestershire Nichols, P Gloucester : Gloucestershire County Council Archaeological Service, 2000, 8pp, An archaeological evaluation was carried out prior to the construction of a golf driving range at The Elms, Bentham. No archaeological features or deposits were present within the evaluation trenches.[au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: PM, MO 2/1090 (C.23.6546) SP 04043644 WORMINGTON TO TIRLEY PIPELINE Wormington to Tirley Pipeline: An Archaeological Survey GSB Prospection Bradford : GSB Prospection, 2000, 21pp, figs Work undertaken by: GSB Prospection The survey undertaken along part of the length of the pipeline correlated well with the results from the scanning, with areas considered to have a high potential producing clear archaeological responses. Conversely those fields regarded as lower potential produced fewer anomolies and concentrations of ridge and furrow and more recent features.[au] Archaeological periods represented: MD, UD 20