NEWCASTLE VISITOR PROFILE AND SATISFACTION REPORT. Summary of results OCTOBER Image: Newcastle Marina, courtesy of Newcastle Tourism

Similar documents
Byron Shire Visitor Profile and Satisfaction Report: Summary and Discussion of Results

Coffs Coast Visitor Profile and Satisfaction Report: Summary and Discussion of Results

Domestic VFR travel to NSW

Lord Howe Island Visitor Survey 2017

SHORT BREAKS TO NSW INTRODUCTION

Domestic Youth Visitors to NSW

Byron Shire Visitor Profile and Satisfaction Survey

Domestic Caravan and Camping Travel to NSW YE December 2016

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander suicide data 2016

Dover Town Visitor Survey Report of findings

ISLANDS VISITOR SURVEY

36% 64% 57% 43% Base: Total Sample - Excluding Residents (n=2,433) Base: Total Sample (n=2,480)

Barkly Region. Visitor Profile & Satisfaction (VPS) Report

The Visitor Experience in Britain

77% of visitors to Aberdeen City & Shire spend one or more nights in the area

Isle of Wight destination report

International market segments

2010 Nova Scotia Visitor Exit Survey Regional Report

CEREDIGION VISITOR SURVEY 2011 TOTAL SAMPLE. November 2011

Wiltshire destination report

2010 Nova Scotia Visitor Exit Survey Regional Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS. TOURIST EXPENDITURE 31 Average Spend per Person per Night ( ) 31 Tourist Expenditure per Annum ( ) 32

Bath destination report

AUSTRALIA S CORAL COAST 2017 FACTSHEET. Produced Tourism WA - Strategy and Research

Cotswolds destination report

Brighton destination report

ISLANDS VISITOR SURVEY

ATE 2015 Special series:

York destination report

Events Tasmania Research Program Hobart Baroque Festival

2012 In-Market Research Report. Kootenay Rockies

Bristol destination report

SATISFACTION WITH VISITOR EXPERIENCE:

MELBOURNE S WEST TOURISM RESEARCH

Papua New Guinea International Visitor Survey

RESEARCH AND PLANNING FORT STEELE HERITAGE TOWN VISITOR STUDY 2007 RESULTS. May 2008

Destination Visitor Survey Strategic Regional Research Queensland: Understanding the Queensland Touring Group

OVERVIEW Four year annual average to the year ending September 2014

Angus Visitor Survey. Findings from July 2016 to June tourism consumer insights. tourir

2009/10 NWT Park User Satisfaction Survey Report

Tourism Kelowna Visitor Intercept Survey Findings FINAL DRAFT REPORT

MOURNE & SLIEVE CROOB AONB. VISITORS SURVEY Summary Report

Kent destination report

Blackpool destination report

Economic Contribution of Tourism to NSW

Papua New Guinea International Visitor Survey

Oxford destination report

Survey into foreign visitors to Tallinn Target market: Cruise voyagers. TNS Emor March 2012

Bournemouth destination report

Papua New Guinea International Visitor Survey. January December 2017 Simon Milne

MOTIVATORS TO VISIT: TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR:

Economic Contribution of Tourism to NSW

Cruise tourism in Akaroa: Visitor experiences, business stakeholder perceptions, and community attitudes Michael Shone & Jude Wilson 31 July 2013

OVERVIEW Four year annual average to the year ending September 2014

INTERNATIONAL VISITOR SURVEY PAPUA NEW GUINEA

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2014 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Greater Portland & Casco Bay

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2015 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Greater Portland & Casco Bay

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2015 Calendar Year Annual Report Canadian Visitors

OVERVIEW Four year annual average to the year ending September 2014

OVERVIEW Four year annual average to the year ending September 2014

National Touring Survey Report

CORNWALL VISITOR SURVEY 06/07. Final report. Produced by South West Tourism Research Department For and on behalf of Visit Cornwall.

NORTHUMBERLAND VISITOR SURVEY 2010

Tourism Kelowna Visitor Intercept Survey Findings by Season FINAL DRAFT REPORT

Domestic Tourism Snapshot Year ending March 2018

OVERVIEW Four year annual average to the year ending September 2014

Papua New Guinea International Visitor Survey. January December 2017 Simon Milne

SURVEY RESULTS: HOTEL AND HOSTEL GUESTS

Obtaining and Applying Tourism Research to Your Business. March 2012 Presented by Amanda Coghlan Strategic Insights Analyst Destination NSW

Cedar Rapids Area Convention and Visitors Bureau Visitor Study

OVERVIEW Four year annual average to the year ending September 2014

Cultural and Heritage Tourism to NSW

Domestic Market (Q1 2018): Several year-on-year changes were noted for the domestic market this quarter, including:

DAVID SHELDON Chair Australian Regional Tourism Network (ARTN inc 2001)

VISITOR EXPECTATIONS SECTION

Guess Who s Going to the Gallery?

Tourism to the Regions of Wales 2008

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2012 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Maine Lakes and Mountains

visitor insights 2016

OVERVIEW Four year annual average to the year ending September 2014

Blue Mountains Visitors. International overnight, domestic overnight and domestic daytrip visitors. Sep-11. Jun-11. Sep-10. Dec-10. Dec-11.

OVERVIEW Four year annual average to the year ending September 2014

Tourist motives and activities as drivers of tourist satisfaction among men and women

OVERVIEW Four year annual average to the year ending September 2014

Contents Manningham at a Glance... 6 Location and Area... 6 Manningham Activity Centres... 6 Manningham Suburbs... 6 Population... 8 Forecast... 9 For

Yorkshire Dales National Park Visitor Survey

OVERVIEW Four year annual average to the year ending September 2014

2011 Visitor Profile Survey

OVERVIEW Four year annual average to the year ending September 2014

Cairngorms National Park Visitor Survey 2009/2010 Summary

OVERVIEW Four year annual average to the year ending September 2014

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2015 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Mid-Coast

OVERVIEW Four year annual average to the year ending September 2014

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2013 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: The Maine Beaches

2016 Cruise Ship Passenger Survey & Economic Impact Study. Final Report of Findings. December 2016

Irish Fair of Minnesota: 2017 Attendee Profile

Norfolk Island tourism industry

Civil Aviation Authority:

Prepared for: TOMM Committee Kangaroo Island CB Contact: Naomi Downer, Account Director Phone: (08)

Cooma-Monaro Visitors. International overnight, domestic overnight and domestic daytrip visitors. Sep-11. Sep-10. Jun-11. Dec-11. Dec-10.

Transcription:

NEWCASTLE VISITOR PROFILE AND SATISFACTION REPORT Summary of results OCTOBER 2013 Image: Newcastle Marina, courtesy of Newcastle Tourism

3 NEWCASTLE VISITOR PROFILE AND SATISFACTION REPORT: SUMMARY OF RESULTS Most commonly, visitors to Newcastle in this study saw the sights, ate out and shopped. The majority of visitors to Newcastle expected an opportunity to relax and rejuvenate, to experience beach and water activities, to tour around and explore, and to discover or learn something new. The respondents were generally satisfied with their visit to Newcastle, particularly with natural attractions. Beaches, bush and harbour, friendliness of locals, personal safety and security and local atmosphere were aspects with which they were particularly satisfied. These are findings from a Visitor Profile and Satisfaction (VPS) project completed under the Destination Visitor Survey Program (DVS) run by Tourism Research Australia (TRA). The project was undertaken in partnership with Destination NSW, the City of Newcastle and Newcastle NOW to gain a better understanding of visitors to the region, including their motivations and satisfaction with their visit. Results can assist with destination management including planning, development and marketing. HOW WE CONDUCTED THIS STUDY The Newcastle VPS project was conducted during January and February 2013. This study represents a snapshot of a specific time of the year, which needs to be taken into account when considering the results. For details of the standard methodology used in TRA s VPS projects, please refer to the website. Survey respondents for this study were recruited at various locations around the Newcastle region. A total of 341 respondents completed the survey. Over one-quarter of survey respondents (28%) were day cruise visitors, reflecting Newcastle s use as a port for cruise ships. The VPS program has been running since 2005 and the results from over 80 projects in Australian regional tourist destinations have been collated in the VPS Benchmark Database. This allows the results of each destination to be benchmarked against other destinations. Care should be taken when making comparisons to benchmarks as visitor composition may differ significantly across destinations and time periods. In this study, the majority of respondents were domestic visitors (80%) with 20% being from overseas. The benchmark is 11% overseas visitors. Around half of visitors to Newcastle stayed overnight (48%) the remainder (52%) were day visitors. The benchmark proportion of day visitors is 27%.

NEWCASTLE VISITOR PROFILE AND SATISFACTION REPORT: SUMMARY OF RESULTS 4 TOURISM RESEARCH AUSTRALIA WHY NEWCASTLE? Respondents were asked for both the main reason they chose to visit Newcastle, as well as all the other reasons that led to their visit. FIGURE 1: REASONS FOR CHOOSING NEWCASTLE (MAIN REASON AND ALL REASONS) During the recruitment period, a number of cruise ships were in port at Newcastle. As a consequence, the most commonly reported reason for visiting Newcastle was that it was a cruise destination. Cruise destination To visit family there 23% 15% 20% 23% One in five respondents reported being in Newcastle to visit family and 15% of respondents said this was the main reason they visited. To attend a specific event or exhibition 14% 20% There's a variety of things to see and do 6% 15% To visit friends there 8% 14% To visit a specific attraction(s) 5% 10% It was a convenient stop-over point 5% 9% Main reason All reasons Base: Excludes don t know responses. Multiple responses allowed for all reasons.

5 EXPERIENCES FIGURE 2: EXPERIENCES EXPECTED Respondents were asked what they expected to experience while visiting Newcastle, and then whether or not those expectations were met. Experience (% expecting experience) Food and wine experiences (52%) 59% Compared to other benchmark destinations, respondents were more likely to expect to discover or learn something new, experience our nation s / Australia s history, and have food and wine experiences. Discover or learn something new (65%) Experience our nation's/australia's history (58%) 58% 58% While at least one in four respondents reported that their experiences were better than expected on all attributes, one in ten respondents who expected good shopping were disappointed with the experience. This may be attributed to cruise visitors finding many shops shut on a Saturday afternoon. More than half of respondents reported that food and wine and arts and cultural experiences exceeded expectations and it was these attributes where Newcastle performed best compared to the benchmark attributes. Beach and water activities (69%) Spend quality time with family (55%) Spend quality time with partner (62%) Spend quality time with friends (53%) Experience arts or culture (41%) Relaxation and rejuvenation (69%) 0% -2% -1% -5% -2% 57% 57% 56% 53% 52% 47% Tour around and explore (67%) 47% Sporting events and activities (31%) 0% 46% Nature based experiences (56%) -4% 44% Quality of accommodation (39%) -2% 43% Luxury and indulgence (20%) -1% 43% Good shopping (38%) -11% 41% Enjoyable nightlife and entertainment (26%) -1% 40% Variety of accommodation (42%) 40% Below expectations Above expectations Base: Excludes don t know responses for expected experiences. For the rating of experiences the base is the proportion of respondents expecting that experience.

NEWCASTLE VISITOR PROFILE AND SATISFACTION REPORT: SUMMARY OF RESULTS 6 TOURISM RESEARCH AUSTRALIA ACTIVITIES AND ATTRACTIONS Respondents were asked to indicate if they had undertaken a number of activities on their trip to Newcastle and which attractions they visited. FIGURE 3: TOP ACTIVITIES General sightseeing 67% General sightseeing was the most common activity in the region, reported by two in three respondents. Nobbys Beach was the most visited attraction in Newcastle followed by the Hunter Street Mall and Queens Wharf. Eat out Go shopping Go to the beach Visit heritage buildings & sites Visit museums or art galleries Visit friends and relatives Go to the markets 50% 46% 33% 31% 28% 26% Base: Excludes don t know responses. Only activities undertaken by at least one in four respondents are shown. FIGURE 4: TOP 10 ATTRACTIONS VISITED Nobbys Beach Hunter Street Mall Queens Wharf Harbour Breakwall Fort Scratchley Foreshore Park/ Esplanade Nobbys Lighthouse Newcastle Beach Honeysuckle Precinct Newcastle Museum 35% 33% 31% 26% 23% 22% Base: Excludes don t know responses.

7 WERE THEY HAPPY WITH THEIR VISIT? Respondents were asked a range of questions about their satisfaction with Newcastle, whether or not they would recommend the destination and their likelihood of returning. FIGURE 5: SATISFACTION, RECOMMENDATIONS AND LIKELIHOOD OF RETURNING 100% Satisfaction Recommendation Return 12 mths Return 3 years Newcastle performed similarly to the benchmark average in terms of overall satisfaction. However, respondents were less likely than the benchmark average to say they would recommend Newcastle as a place to visit. This was more noticeable among cruise visitors who may not have experienced all Newcastle had to offer. Families were the most likely to say they would highly recommend Newcastle, but at 46% this was still below the benchmark average of 51%. The reported likelihood to return to Newcastle in the next 12 months was slightly above the benchmark average, while a much higher proportion of respondents stated they are very likely to return in the next 3 years than the benchmark average. 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% -20% -40% 51% 48% 52% 38% 35% 38% 35% 37% 31% 34% 24% 24% 32% 35% 43% 23% Cruise visitors were more likely to report that they were very satisfied with their visit to Newcastle than non-cruise visitors. Family groups and older, retired travellers were more satisfied than young and older working couples. Satisfaction with friendliness of locals, attractions, food and beverage and local transport were all at least three points above the VPS benchmark. Public toilets were reported by Newcastle respondents to be very important (35%), more so than other destinations (). These respondents were less satisfied with this aspect of their trip to Newcastle. -60% B'mark Newcastle B'mark Newcastle B'mark Newcastle B'mark Newcastle Base: Item responses have been classified as either positive or negative for ease of display. B mark = Benchmark. For the actual labels used on the questionnaire, please go to www.tra.gov.au. FIGURE 6: BEST THINGS ABOUT NEWCASTLE (HIGHEST OVERALL SATISFACTION SCORES) Natural attractions Very negative Negative Neutral Positive Very positive 24% 65% Friendliness of locals Personal safety and security Local atmosphere Attractions Food and beverage Variety of things to see and do 27% 32% 32% 33% 34% 61% 58% 54% 54% 53% 51% Base: Excludes don t know responses. Very dissat. Fairly dissat. Neutral Fairly sat. Very sat.

NEWCASTLE VISITOR PROFILE AND SATISFACTION REPORT: SUMMARY OF RESULTS 8 TOURISM RESEARCH AUSTRALIA WHAT WERE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THEIR TRIP? TRAVEL PARTY, TRANSPORT, ACCOMMODATION & TRIP PLANNING n Respondents were most likely to be travelling with their partner (44%). n Around four in ten respondents drove to Newcastle (37%) which was substantially lower than the benchmark average. This can be attributed to the high proportion of cruise visitors in the sample (29%). A further 16% arrived by train. n For the non-cruise visitors, the largest proportion stayed with friends and relatives (43%). This is considerably higher than the benchmark average. n The proportion of people staying in caravan parks and commercial camping groups was very low in this study (2%) compared to the benchmark average (23%). n There were slightly more first-time visitors than the benchmark average (35% vs 31%), with 65% of Newcastle respondents being repeat visitors. For half of the cruise visitors (49%) this was their first visit to Newcastle. n The majority of repeat visitors to Newcastle have visited once or twice in the past 12 months (57%), while more than half (53%) have visited at least four times in the past three years. n Visitors to Newcastle planned their trip much further ahead when compared to the benchmark average planning the trip more than 3 months prior to the visit. This was 10 points above the VPS benchmark at 40%, reflecting the large proportion of cruise visitors and longer planning periods for these visitors. n The internet was not only the most popular information source but also the most common booking method. Six in ten (60%) visitors to Newcastle used the internet to search for trip-related information and more than half of all visitors made bookings for their trip using the internet (54%). n Visit Newcastle (www.visitnewcastle.com) was the most used specific destination website (37%) and it was rated the most useful destination website overall (16%). n Nearly half the respondents (53%) used mobile technology. Of those who reported using mobile technology, 46% used it for planning the trip and 78% used it during the trip. n Smart phones were the most common mobile device (64%), followed by GPS devices (33%).

9 PROFILE OF SURVEY RESPONDENTS This profile is provided to help with interpreting the findings of the VPS study. It should not be interpreted as a profile of all visitors to Newcastle as it relates to a particular point in time and comes from a limited number of locations at the destination. NEWCASTLE VPS BENCHMARK Purpose VFR 25% 14% Holiday 53% 69% Special event 11% 6% Business 3% 5% Other 8% 5% Origin New South Wales 56% 28% Victoria 9% 27% Queensland 9% 13% South Australia 1% 7% Western Australia 2% 4% Tasmania 1% 5% Northern Territory 0% 1% Australian Capital Territory 2% 2% Other Australia 1% 0% Overseas 20% 12% Gender Female 63% 58% Male 37% 42% NEWCASTLE VPS BENCHMARK Age group 15 to 24 5% 6% 25 to 34 9% 14% 35 to 44 17% 17% 45 to 54 19% 21% 55 to 64 25% 65+ 20% 17% Lifecycle Young/midlife single with no kids 7% 9% Household income Young/midlife couple with no kids 9% 12% Family 31% 33% Older working single/couple 25% 19% Older non-working single/couple 27% 26% $1 to $4,199 0% 1% $4,200 to $8,299 1% 1% $8,300 to $15,599 3% 4% $15,600 to $25,999 5% 9% $26,000 to $36,399 6% 11% $36,400 to $51,999 13% 16% $52,000 to $77,999 17% 21% $78,000 to $103,999 18% 16% $104,000 to $129,999 13% 9% $130,000 to $149,999 8% 5% $150,000+ 18% 9%