Stepwise Integration of UAS into the ATM System

Similar documents
UAS in European Civil Airspace: USICO and SINUE Results

FILE AND FLY PROCEDURES AND TECHNIQUES FOR INTEGRATION OF UAVS IN CONTROLLED AIRSPACE

National Technology Project OUTCAST. M. Selier R&D Engineer Military Operations Research Department

SECTORLESS ATM ANALYSIS AND SIMULATION RESULTS

SOFIA. Safe AutOmatic Flight Back and LandIng of Aircraft

Technologies for Autonomous Operations of UAVs

NM Top 5 Safety Priorities. Tzvetomir BLAJEV

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

New issues raised on collision avoidance by the introduction of remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) in the ATM system

Disruptive Technologies in Air Traffic Management (ATM) - Example: flight centric operations (sectorless ATM)

Flying SESAR from the RPAS Perspective. Robin GARRITY, SESAR JU ATM Expert Third SESAR Innovation Days, Stockholm, 26 th to 28 th November 2013

Runway Incursion Preventive measures at aircraft level

OPERATIONS MANUAL PART A

DEMORPAS Project. Final Dissemination Forum. 10th March 2016, World ATM Congress, Madrid

Real-time Simulations to Evaluate the RPAS Integration in Shared Airspace

30 th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)

Next Generation Airspace Developments: Key Operational Trends and Enablers

GENERAL REPORT. Reduced Lateral Separation Minima RLatSM Phase 2. RLatSM Phase 3

FLIGHT STRIP MANAGEMENT - APPROACH LEVEL

RPAS Integration in the Airspace SESAR JU demonstration activities Catherine Ronflé-Nadaud

Atlantic Interoperability Initiative to Reduce Emissions AIRE

Nav Specs and Procedure Design Module 12 Activities 8 and 10. European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation

Overview of ACAS II / TCAS II

HOLDING STACK MANAGEMENT

CDA Continuous Descent Approach

Virtual Royal Air Force 45 (R) Sqn Syllabus

Establishing a Risk-Based Separation Standard for Unmanned Aircraft Self Separation

International Civil Aviation Organization THIRD MEETING OF THE GREPECAS ATM/CNS SUBGROUP ATM COMMITTEE AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT TASK FORCE (ATFM/TF/3)

Space Based ADS-B. ICAO SAT meeting - June 2016 AIREON LLC PROPRIETARY INFORMATION

Impact of a new type of aircraft on ATM

A Pilot s perspective

Overview of Worldwide Data Link Equipage Mandates

AIR/GROUND SIMULATION OF TRAJECTORY-ORIENTED OPERATIONS WITH LIMITED DELEGATION

Any queries about the content of the attached document should be addressed to: ICAO EUR/NAT Office:

IFR SEPARATION USING RADAR

Collision Avoidance UPL Safety Seminar 2012

TCAS Pilot training issues

COLLISION AVOIDANCE FOR RPAS

SPECIAL PROCEDURES FOR IN-FLIGHT CONTINGENCIES IN OCEANIC AIRSPACE OF SEYCHELLES FIR

Sven Kaltenhäuser, Frank Morlang, Dirk-Roger Schmitt German Aerospace Center DLR

PROPOSED UPDATES TO FLIGHT OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR HURRICANE HUNTER AIRCRAFT (TEAL & NOAA) (Presented by the United States) SUMMARY

PBN Airspace Concept. ATS requirements

FINAL REPORT BOEING B777, REGISTRATION 9V-SWH LOSS OF SEPARATION EVENT 3 JULY 2014

ERASMUS. Strategic deconfliction to benefit SESAR. Rosa Weber & Fabrice Drogoul

International Civil Aviation Organization The Twentieth Meeting of the APANPIRG ATM/AIS/SAR Sub-Group (ATM/AIS/SAR/SG/20) Singapore, July 2010

North Atlantic Initiatives

AIRCRAFT INCIDENT REPORT

TRAFFIC ALERT AND COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM (TCAS II)

REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS SYMPOSIUM March Detect and Avoid. DI Gerhard LIPPITSCH. ICAO RPAS Panel Detect & Avoid Rapporteur

Virtual Royal Air Force 208 (R) Sqn Syllabus

The VINGA project. Henrik Ekstrand Novair Flight Operations Aerospace Technology Congress

CAR Section II Series I Part VIII is proposed to be amended. The proposed amendments are shown in subsequent affect paragraphs.

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS): regulatory framework and challenges. NAM/CAR/SAM Civil - Military Cooperation Havana, Cuba, April 2015

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 27 Aug Z. (5nm NE Coventry Airport) Airspace: London FIR (Class: G)

INTEGRATING RPAS PUBLISHED APPROACH PROCEDURES VS. LOCAL ARRANGEMENTS

SECTION 6 - SEPARATION STANDARDS

ADS-B Implementation and Regulation Meeting for the NAM/CAR/SAM Regions 26 to 30 November 2018 Mexico City, Mexico

THE MIDCAS PROJECT. Johan Pellebergs Saab Aerosystems. Keywords: UAS, Sense & Avoid, Standardization, Non-segregated Airspace

AIRPROX REPORT No PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB

ADS-B. Not just a mandate! Forrest Colliver Becker Avionics GmbH Becker Avionics GmbH All rights reserved -

SESAR Solutions at ATC Global Surface Management

PBN Performance. Based Navigation. - PBN & Airspace Concepts - ICAO PBN Seminar Introduction to PBN

Date: 01 Jun 2018 Time: 0959Z Position: 5121N 00048W Location: 6nm N Farnborough

Honeywell.com PBN Concepts Krakow, Poland

CLEARANCE INSTRUCTION READ BACK

CHAPTER 5 SEPARATION METHODS AND MINIMA

AIRPROX REPORT No

EMMA2 Introduction. EMMA2 Demonstration Day Malpensa, Michael Roeder. Internet:

NASA s Role in Integration of UAVs

French DSNA approach to CNS rationalization & evolution

Pilot RVSM Training Guidance Material

B0 FRTO, B0-NOPS, B0-ASUR and B0-ACAS Implementation in the AFI and MID Regions

For a 1309 System Approach of the Conflict Management

Noise Abatement Arrival Procedures at Louisville International Airport. Prof. John-Paul Clarke Georgia Institute of Technology

AUSTRALIA AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICE AIRSERVICES AUSTRALIA GPO BOX 367 CANBERRA ACT 2601 CESSATION OF NAVIGATION APPROVALS UNDER CAO 20.

OPEN SKIES CAT B NDS Subject to NOTAM: Yes (by Airspace Regulation)

PBN Performance. Based Navigation. Days 1, 2 & 3. ICAO PBN Seminar Seminar Case Studies Days 1,2,3. Seminar Case Studies

AIR LAW AND ATC PROCEDURES

Analysis of Operational Impacts of Continuous Descent Arrivals (CDA) using runwaysimulator

ALTIMETER SETTING PROCEDURES

Air Traffic Management and Space Transportation System Wide Information Management and Integration into European Airspace

AIRBUS 12 th Performance and

ACAS on VLJs and LJs Assessment of safety Level (AVAL) Outcomes of the AVAL study (presented by Thierry Arino, Egis Avia)

Flight Testing the Wake Encounter Avoidance and Advisory system: First results

Introduction Fly By Wire Aircraft & New Technology

Dave Allanby GM Operations SOUTH AFRICAN EXPRESS

AIP PORTUGAL ENR NOV-2007

Safety Syllabus. VFR into IMC

When Plans Don t Go as Planned

CEPT Workshop on Spectrum for Drones / UAS

MODULE 4: SIDs and STARs. Slide <#> of

1.1 Definition Distress is defined as a condition of being threatened by serious and/or imminent danger and requiring immediate assistance.

Date: 14 Jun 2017 Time: 1600Z Position: 5121N 00102W Location: 7nm NW Blackbushe airport

German Ministry of Defense and DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH. Enabling RPAS Operations within German airspace

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 9 Sep Z. (6nm N Linton on Ouse) Airspace: Vale of York AIAA (Class: G)

IFR SEPARATION WITHOUT RADAR

UAS/NAS Forum: Technology Milestones Necessary for NAS Certification Autonomy: Relating UAS Automation to Certification

EUROCONTROL AVAL Project. AVAL Phase 1 findings (presented by Thierry Arino)

Follow up to the implementation of safety and air navigation regional priorities XMAN: A CONCEPT TAKING ADVANTAGE OF ATFCM CROSS-BORDER EXCHANGES

Aircraft Systems and 4D Trajectory Management

Transcription:

DLR.de Chart 1 Stepwise Integration of UAS into the ATM System Dr. Bernd Korn DLR Institute of Flight Guidance

DLR.de Chart 2 UAS integration: All vehicles in all airspace

DLR.de Chart 3 Equivalent UAS Operations Integration with ATC / ATM relay C³ link Relay NAV, AFCS, FMS FTS, MMS other aircraft direct C³ link follow ATC advisories select COM frequ. & XpdrCode UAV strobe lights ACAS see & avoid Radar Display with a/c labels & UAV identifier VHF COM SSR Mode A/C/S UAS Pilot Ground Control Station telephone Air Traffic Control

DLR.de Chart 4 Safety Layers in Civil Airspace German UAV Demonstrator Program WASLA-HALE (2000-2008) PHASE I+II PHASE III

DLR.de Chart 5 UAS Intergration into Airspace Procedural Airspace closure ATC Procedural TCAS OR Procedural Off-Route Concept Detect & Avoid mod. ATC mod. TCAS Higher Sep - Minima Detect & Avoid

DLR.de Chart 6 How to enable UAS-specific procedures? Manned traffic Add ATCO for additional UAS-traffic UAS-traffic Virtual Teaming of UAS ATCO and UAS-Operator Shared Situation Awareness

DLR.de Chart 7 Concept elements UAS specific separation minima: e.g. 9 nm / 2000 ft In case of conflicts with manned aircraft: priority is given to manned aircraft à Only UAS-ATCO has to react! In emergency situations: UAS gets priority * Conflict Detection Avoidance Responsibility Avoidance Manoeuvre Assignment Centre GW0001 FL370 0.78 Start Descent ba360 Start Potential Conflict Area ROW002 FL370 0.74 Altitude Restricted Area ea360 ba360 ea360 *Derived from the Sectorless ATM concept, now Flight Centric ATC in SESAR 2020 (see Korn and Birkmeier, DASC 2009, DASC 2010, DASC 2011, DASC2012 )

DLR.de Chart 8 ATC UAS Communication UAV UAS Pilot Ground Control Station telephone Air Traffic Control

DLR.de Chart 9 ATC UAS Communication UAV UAS Pilot Ground Control Station telephone Air Traffic Control

DLR.de Chart 10 Simulation Environment UAS-ATCO WP Traffic_Sim UAS GCS Pseudopilot WP Controller WP Data pool Datalink Conflict Detection Avoidance Responsibility Avoidance Manoeuvre Assignment Centre GW0001 FL370 0.78 Start Descent ba360 Start Potential Conflict Area ROW002 FL370 0.74 Altitude Restricted Area ea360 ba360 ea360

DLR.de Chart 11 UAS ATCO Interface (for 6 UAS)

DLR.de Chart 12 Simulation Setup Objective: What happens in off-nominal situations (emergencies) à Assess potential for separation violation Scenario Two differnet HALE missions in German Airspace M1: Reconnaissance M2: Transfer Manned Traffic (very busy day from Sep 2008) 6 UAS Off-Nominal Situations: E1: Route deviation E2: Datalink loss E3: Stall (sudden descent) 20 iterations per scenario (starting point of each UAV-mission was different in each iteration)

DLR.de Chart 13 Events E1: Deviation from cleared ATC routes unexpected deviation from the planned route by 5-10 degrees and returns back to original route after approx. 15 NM E2: Datalink loss UA is automatically entering a datalink recovery procedure: UA is flying a helix-like climb pattern (approx. 5NM radius) from its actual altitude up to FL500 in order to try to re-establish communication. E3: Stall (sudden descent) UA is suddenly executing a steep descent of ca. 4000ft due to a stall event until it recovers and returns to its original flight path.

Folie 14 > Vortrag > Autor

DLR.de Chart 16 Conflicts for E3 (Stall event) 240 UAV flights

DLR.de Chart 17 Conflicts for E1 (Route deviation) 240 UAV flights

DLR.de Chart 18 Conflicts for E2 (D/L recovery pattern) 240 UAV flights

DLR.de Chart 19 E2 D/L loss: returning to original flightplan after recovery Long CDA Helix Descend

DLR.de Chart 20 Conclusion Concept for integration UAS with UAS specific separation requirements Additional UAS specific controller position Could relax requirements for the UAS D/L and Sense & Avoid equipment Offers possibility to stepwise integrate UAS Almost no change on Standard ATC Traffic Management Clear set of rules what to do for conflict avoidance In nominal and off-nominal situations First simulation results show: Conflict potential can be minimised by good mission planning Good recovery strategy from off-nominal events can minimize risk of separation violation

DLR.de Chart 21 Here at the World Congress UAS GCS ATCO-Position Live Demonstration Tue: 11:00 and 15:15 Wed: 11:00 and 15:15 Thu: 11:00

DLR.de Chart 22