HOLDING STACK MANAGEMENT

Similar documents
FLIGHT STRIP MANAGEMENT - APPROACH LEVEL

HOLDING PATTERN USING VOR

IFR SEPARATION WITHOUT RADAR

FLIGHT PLAN VALIDATION

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

SECTION 6 - SEPARATION STANDARDS

IFR SEPARATION USING RADAR

CHAPTER 5 SEPARATION METHODS AND MINIMA

SECTION 4 - APPROACH CONTROL PROCEDURES

THE AREA CONTROL CENTRE (CTR) POSITION

CLEARANCE INSTRUCTION READ BACK

ENR 1.7 ALTIMETER SETTING PROCEDURES

THE TOWER CONTROL POSITION (TWR)

IVAO Switzerland Division

1.2 An Approach Control Unit Shall Provide the following services: c) Alerting Service and assistance to organizations involved in SAR Actions;

Chapter 6. Airports Authority of India Manual of Air Traffic Services Part 1

SULAYMANIYAH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MATS CHAPTER 11

OPERATIONS MANUAL PART A

Chapter 6. Nonradar. Section 1. General DISTANCE

Instrument Proficiency Check Flight Record

MINIMUM FLIGHT ALTITUDES

AREA NAVIGATION RNAV- MANAGEMENT


IVAO Nordic Region November 2018 PILOT BRIEFING ROVANIEMI X-MAS FLY-IN

Lecture Minimum safe flight altitude

SID/STAR phraseology FAQ Canadian implementation April 27, 2017

AIRSPACE CLASSES. All flights are provided with air traffic control service and are separated from each other. limit Communication clearance

OPERATIONS MANUAL PART A

SEMI-CIRCULAR RULE. The default worldwide semi-circular rule is the East/West orientation of the flight level parity:

PHRASEOLOGY COMMON MISTAKES

CHAPTER 4 AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES

INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATIONS. Agenda Item: B.5.12 IFATCA 09 WP No. 94

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for BAGHDAD (ORBI)

MODULE 4: SIDs and STARs. Slide <#> of

CFIT-Procedure Design Considerations. Use of VNAV on Conventional. Non-Precision Approach Procedures

Single Engine Instrument Training Record I PREFLIGHT PREPARATION WEATHER INFORMATION weather reports and forecasts. pilot and radar reports.

PBN AIRSPACE CONCEPT WORKSHOP. SIDs/STARs/HOLDS. Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) ICAO Doc 9931

Minimum Safe. Federal Aviation Administration Altitude Warning. Presented to: Pan American Aviation Safety Summit; Sao Paulo, Brazil

Beijing, 18 h of September 2014 Pierre BACHELIER Head of ATM Programme. Cockpit Initiatives. ATC Global 2014

Radio procedures for glider pilots August 2009

LFPG / Paris-Charles de Gaulle / CDG

Any queries about the content of the attached document should be addressed to: ICAO EUR/NAT Office:

INTERNATIONAL VIRTUAL AVIATION ORGANISATION CANADIAN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL PHRASEOLOGY ATC OPERATIONS DECEMBER 2016 BY: MATHIEU LAFLAMME

IFR FLIGHT BRIEFING. This IFR flight briefing presentation has been made concise and simple in order to easily handle the IFR flight preparation.

ALTIMETER SETTING PROCEDURES

ZTL ARTCC. Asheville Regional. Air Traffic Control Tower. Standard Operating Procedures AVL B. Effective: May 1, 2011

WAKE TURBULENCE SEPARATION MINIMA

Stanfield VOR Procedures

Doha Hamad International OTHH - Guideline for pilots

SPECIAL PROCEDURES FOR IN-FLIGHT CONTINGENCIES IN OCEANIC AIRSPACE OF SEYCHELLES FIR

Date: 29 Apr 2017 Time: 1119Z Position: 5226N 00112W Location: 10nm ENE Coventry

Honeywell.com PBN Concepts Krakow, Poland

EXTENDED-RANGE TWIN-ENGINE OPERATIONS

RALEIGH-DURHAM ATCT/TRACON STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

PILOT BRIEFING GENEVA RFE 2018

LETTER OF AGREEMENT. Between

EFFECTIVE NOTAM KOUN SPECIAL FLIGHT PROCEDURES 09/08 NORMAN, OK

KTPF PETER O. KNIGHT AIRPORT TAMPA, FL 10/27 NOTAM SPECIAL FLIGHT PROCEDURES EFFECTIVE

AIR LAW AND ATC PROCEDURES

VFR PHRASEOLOGY. The word IMMEDIATELY should only be used when immediate action is required for safety reasons.

NOTAM. Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) Fly-In Colorado Springs Airport (COS) Colorado Springs, CO SPECIAL FLIGHT PROCEDURES

AIRCRAFT INCIDENT REPORT

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR 18/18

NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES

Date: 01 Jun 2018 Time: 0959Z Position: 5121N 00048W Location: 6nm N Farnborough

Design Airspace (Routes, Approaches and Holds) Module 11 Activity 7. European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation

JACK EDWARDS NATIONAL AIRPORT (JKA) GULF SHORES, AL

Burlington ATCT Standard Operating Procedures

Northern Regional Training Scheme. EGBB Birmingham Airport Pilot s Guide. REVISION 1 (Monday, 30 January 2012)

INSTRUMENT RATING (SENIOR PRIVATE PILOT) UK FLIGHT TEST STANDARDS

Standard Operational Procedures

AIRPORTS There are two types of airport environments: controlled and uncontrolled. A controlled airport has an operating control tower, staffed by

Object: LoA between the Barcelona FIR (LECB) and the Bordeaux FIR (LFBB)

Albany ATCT Standard Operating Procedures

DDSC Radio Procedures for Glider Pilots

FUEL MANAGEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT

Instrument Multi Engine Practical Test Standards

AIRSPACE STRUCTURE. In aeronautics, airspaces are the portion of the atmosphere controlled by a country above its territory.

CHAPTER 7 AEROPLANE COMMUNICATION AND NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT

Pilot RVSM Training Guidance Material

S2 Tower Controller. Allama Iqbal Int l Airport Lahore ( OPLA ) June 2016 Pakistan vacc

SUPPLEMENT A33 TO THE AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL DA 40 NG. Integrated Avionics System Garmin G1000,

ILS APPROACH WITH B737/A320

Separation Methods and Minima

AERODROME OPERATIONS 1 INTRODUCTION

2014 NOTAM Special Flight Procedures. Indianapolis, IN Effective 0600 EDST (Local) May 30, 2014 Until 2000 EDST (Local) May 31, 2014

40 BEALEAFBI OCTOBER Chapter 8 RQ-4 OPERATIONS

AIP PORTUGAL ENR NOV-2007

Continuous Descent? And RNAV Arrivals

CDA Continuous Descent Approach

Northern Regional Training Scheme. EGNT Newcastle Aerodrome Pilot s Guide. REVISION 2 (Wednesday, 03 August 2011 at 15:51)

Approach Specifications

IRELAND AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES IRISH AVIATION AUTHORITY CONTROL TOWER SHANNON AIRPORT

Instrument Refresher Course. Airfield Operations Flight Tower 412 OSS/OSAT

PLAN Anoka County - Blaine Airport

The aim of any instrument approach is to allow the aircraft to safely descend to a low altitude in order to become visual.

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for UAE Centre (OMAE)

EFFECTIVE NOTAM KGON 10/06 SPECIAL FLIGHT PROCEDURES GROTON, CT

IVAO Flight Operations Department Indonesia (ID) Division Procedures

LFKC / Calvi Sainte-Catherine / CLY

Transcription:

1. Introduction HOLDING STACK MANAGEMENT When an air traffic controller has such an amount of traffic in his approach area that he cannot handle more traffic for a determined or non-determined period of time, the air traffic controller can use the holding pattern to put the traffic on hold before taking them into account inside his approach sequence. 2. Holding pattern and stacking process 2.1. Holding pattern A holding pattern is: Constituted of 2 half turns joined by a straight flight leg. The straight flight length is generally 1 minute flight duration or a distance based on a DME. Constituted of a reference fix where the holding pattern starts and where an aircraft can exit to continue the next procedural approach phase of the flight. The turn in the holding pattern is a right turn (like the figure below) by default but it can be published to the left. Flown at a certain altitude with a maximum speed restriction where an aircraft can exit to continue the next procedural approach phase of the flight. Exit Altitude The problem of this holding pattern is that only one aircraft can use the holding pattern at the published altitude. If an air traffic controller (ATC) has several aircraft to put on hold, he cannot use the same holding pattern at the same altitude to handle several aircraft. In this case, ATC shall create a holding stack. Holding stack management Version 1.0 18 march 2016 Page 1

2.2. Holding stack When an air traffic controller (ATC) wants to put on hold several aircraft, he can create a holding stack. A holding stack is the superposition of holding patterns using the same holding reference fix but flown at different altitudes and separated using adequate vertical separation: Exit Vertical Separation Altitude The vertical separation should be the minimum IFR separation (which is 1000ft below FL290), or above 3. Management We shall discuss the following situation: ATC creates a holding stack ATC fills the stack with aircraft ATC removes aircraft from the stack ATC needs to create a multi stack ATC manages stack in function of separation altitude Holding stack management Version 1.0 18 march 2016 Page 2

3.1. Creating a holding stack An ATC will create a holding stack when he cannot integrate an aircraft into the approach sequence. Aircraft approaching which cannot be integrated into the approach sequence On charts, holding patterns are usually published at the initial approach fixes (IAF) which is the end of the arrival phase of flight, and before starting the approach phase. This point associated with the published holding pattern should be taken as holding stack reference point where the air traffic controller starts to construct his waiting stack. 3.2. Filling the stack with aircraft A holding stack shall be considered as a FIFO system. FIFO means FIST-IN FIRST-OUT. In our application, this means that the air traffic controller puts the aircraft in the stack by order of arrival, in order to remove them using the same order. Remember the goal of the air traffic controller in an approach area: he takes the aircraft arriving at high level and controls them to delivery on the final approach path at lower altitude. Arriving aircraft should have a higher altitude than aircraft in the approach sequence. In conclusion, as the controller should put them in the holding stack by order, he shall stack the aircraft using the lowest altitude available above the preceding aircraft which is inside the stack. Remember that the controller will use one aircraft per altitude used in the stack. An aircraft shall be inserted inside the stack at the reference point In our example, the first aircraft is on the first floor of the holding stack. The second aircraft shall be inserted on the second floor above the first one. The third aircraft shall then be inserted on the third floor above the second one. Holding stack management Version 1.0 18 march 2016 Page 3

3.3. Removing aircraft from the stack In the previous chapter, we said that the stack should be considered as a FIFO system so; the traffic controller puts the aircraft in the stack by order of arrival, in order to remove them using the same order. The controller will remove aircraft from the first floor of the holding stack, or the aircraft with the lowest altitude in the stack and normally when the aircraft is on the inbound leg of the holding pattern. In our example, the aircraft at the first floor will exit the stack at first. The air controller should then insert this aircraft into the approach regulation sequence. ATC can remove aircraft from the first floor anywhere from the pattern if the approach regulation sequence requires so. The reasons to choose the first floor of the holding stack or the lowest altitude is: altitude is more compatible with the next approach phase of flight than higher altitude no conflict is possible with other aircraft in the stack if the lowest altitude is selected After the aircraft has left the stack, we need to reorganize the stack using the free holding floor. At this stage, the air traffic controller shall descend each aircraft one by one down to the next free level, taking vertical separation into account. In our example, the aircraft at the second floor will first descend to the next lower level (first floor). The aircraft at the third floor shall maintain his altitude until minimum vertical separation will be guaranteed by the air traffic controller. In our example, the aircraft at the third floor will descend to the next lower level (second floor) as the lower aircraft has reached the first floor and the second floor is free This management should descend all aircraft in the stack and clear the higher level(s) to incoming aircraft. Holding stack management Version 1.0 18 march 2016 Page 4

If the two consecutive floors are separated by vertical separation minimum, we advise air traffic controllers to allow the descent when the lower aircraft has effectively reached its new level. The air traffic controller can anticipate the descent but he shall take into consideration aircraft performance and pilots speed of response. 3.4. Multi stack creation If an air traffic controller uses a published holding pattern to create his stack, he should be limited by the protection area of this holding pattern. The protection area is an altitude where the holding patterns are not protected against other IFR routes and procedures. The air traffic controller can use levels above this protected area but the situation needs extra safety management in order to ensure protection of these levels. Furthermore, the approach controller is limited by his area of responsibility. In conclusion, the number of traffic to insert inside the stack is limited by the maximum altitude of his area of responsibility. In addition, the approach controller can handle arrivals which come from different directions and IAF. In all these situations, the approach controller can create a multi stack in his area of responsibility or create linked stacks with the en-route traffic controller. 3.4.1. Several Stacks In the figure below, there is an example of several holding stacks creation over different fixes in the approach area. The air traffic controller can handle each holding stack separately. The air traffic controller should verify and maintain separation between every holding stack with others at all times if they are not all published. Holding stack management Version 1.0 18 march 2016 Page 5

3.4.2. Linked Stacks As the approach area is limited in terms of altitude, the stack is also limited for its maximum altitude. If we have too many aircraft to stack, the higher controller (en-route controller) can initiate another stack before the approach area. These stack altitudes should be higher than the previous stack. Separation should be done by the air traffic controller between all stacks. Approach area If the stacks are laterally separated, the higher level of the lower stack floor should be inferior or equal to the lower level of the next stack floor. If the ATC thinks that the stacks separation is not granted at all times and for any aircraft, the higher level of the lower stack floor should be inferior to the lower level of the next stack floor and separated by minimum vertical separation considered in the airspace (1000ft below FL290). Holding stack management Version 1.0 18 march 2016 Page 6

3.5. Managing a stack in function of separation altitude The air traffic controller is not limited to use minimum vertical separation (1000ft below FL290) between all floors inside a holding stack. The air traffic controller can use twice the minimum vertical separation (2000ft below FL290) in order to separate the floors in the holding stack. Using twice the minimum vertical separation is a solution for ATC: To prevent aircraft to create conflict alerts when aircraft crew select a wrong altitude or making an undershoot of altitude during descent. To also have free spare levels in order to integrate the going around aircraft inside the holding stack. Going-around aircraft Twice the minimum Vertical Separation Minimum Vertical Separation 4. En-route holding to prevent overload and stack creation The creation of a holding stack should be the ultimate solution for an approach controller in order to handle too much traffic. Each controller has a part of the responsibility to prevent the holding stack creation. In real life, each aircraft is regulated from the clearance given on the ground until its arrival on the approach area. Complex systems calculate arrival estimations of each flight in order to anticipate the overflow of controlled areas. In IVAO, we do not have such complex systems, but ATC to ATC communication should be used to share the overflow situation at some destinations. When desired, the en-route controller can create pre-regulation sequences by reducing the speed of aircraft or by using an en-route holding pattern (see below) in order to create delay. Holding stack management Version 1.0 18 march 2016 Page 7