Appendix 3 REMPLAN Economic Impact Modelling: New Energy Port Hedland Waste to Energy Project

Similar documents
Economic Impact Analysis. Tourism on Tasmania s King Island

HEALTH SECTOR ECONOMIC INDICATORS REPORT

THE 2006 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TRAVEL & TOURISM IN INDIANA

The Economic Impact of Tourism in North Carolina. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2013

Fiji s Tourism Satellite Accounts

Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2010

MINING IN TASMANIA: DINOSAUR OR DELIVERER?

The Economic Impact of Tourism in North Carolina. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2015

ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY OF CALIFORNIA AIRPORTS

Travel & Tourism Sector Ranking United Kingdom. Summary of Findings, November 2013

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Jacksonville, FL. June 2016

Page 1. Economic Impact Assessment of the Palm Island Community Company

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Maryland. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2016

Economic Impact of Tourism in South Dakota, December 2017

Economic Impacts of Campgrounds in New York State

The Economic Base of Colfax County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

Queensland Economic Update

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Maryland. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2015

Manawatu District Economic Profile

Tourism Satellite Account STATISTICS NEW ZEALAND DECEMBER 2002

The Economic Impact Of Luxembourg Airport 29 April 2016

The Economic Impact of Travel in Minnesota Analysis

Southern Cross University Tim Sutton Don Fuller Simon J. Wilde Southern Cross University Stephen Mason Southern Cross University

TOWNSVILLE NORTH QUEENSLAND QUARTERLY ECONOMIC SNAPSHOT

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Guam. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2016

TOWNSVILLE NORTH QUEENSLAND IN FOCUS LIVEABLE THE LARGEST CITY IN NORTHERN AUSTRALIA

Benchmarking Travel & Tourism in United Arab Emirates

The Economic Contribution of Cruise Tourism to the Southeast Asia Region in Prepared for: CLIA SE Asia. September 2015

Travel & Tourism Sector Ranking South Korea

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Buncombe County, North Carolina

Queenstown Airport Economic Impact Assessment

Benchmarking Travel & Tourism in Australia

Economic Impact of Tourism in South Dakota, December 2018

The Economic Impact of the 2015 ASICS Los Angeles Marathon. September 2015

Economic Impact of Aviation in Arizona

Wyoming Travel Impacts

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas Analysis

The Economic Impact of Travel in Kansas. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2013

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Walworth County, Wisconsin. July 2013

Benchmarking Travel & Tourism in Russia

South Australian Centre for Economic Studies June 2016 Economic Briefing Report 28 June, 2016

Regional Universities Network. Introduction. Regional Universities Network. Economic Impact of the Universities in the Regional Universities Network

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Contribution of the Qantas Group to Australia

Wyoming Travel Impacts

Economic Contribution of Tourism to NSW

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County, June 2018

Economic Contribution of Tourism to NSW

Benchmarking Travel & Tourism in Colombia

The Economic Impact of Tourism in The Appalachian Region of Ohio. June 2014

LORD HOWE ISLAND MARINE PARK PROFILE OF LOCAL BUSINESSES. Department of Environment Climate Change & Water. Prepared For: Prepared By:

The Economic Impact of Tourism in The Appalachian Region of Ohio. June 2016

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County. July 2017

Contents Manningham at a Glance... 6 Location and Area... 6 Manningham Activity Centres... 6 Manningham Suburbs... 6 Population... 8 Forecast... 9 For

The Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011

Mexico. How does Travel & Tourism compare to other sectors? GDP. Size. Share. Mexico GDP Impact by Industry. Mexico GDP Impact by Industry

United Kingdom. How does Travel & Tourism compare to other sectors? GDP. Size. Share. UK GDP Impact by Industry. UK GDP Impact by Industry

Measuring travel services and tourism in New Zealand. October 2013

Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County September 2016

Oregon Travel Impacts p

The Economic Impact of Tourism in: Dane County & Madison, Wisconsin. April 2017

The Economic Impact of Tourism New Forest Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas

ISRAEL- COUNTRY FACTS

The regional value of tourism in the UK: 2013

Introduction on the Tourism Satellite Account

Kern County: Last Redoubt of the California Dream?

Travel and Tourism in Canada to 2017

SALT LAKE CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. September 2018

Australian Casino Association ECONOMIC REPORT. Prepared for. Australian Casino Association. June Finance and Economics

The Travel and Tourism Industry in Vermont. A Benchmark Study of the Economic Impact of Visitor Expenditures on the Vermont Economy 2005

CRUISE ACTIVITY IN BARCELONA. Impact on the Catalan economy and socioeconomic profile of cruise passengers (2014)

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

ESTIMATION OF ECONOMIC IMPACTS FOR AIRPORTS IN HAWTHORNE, EUREKA, AND ELY, NEVADA

What will Mackay be like in 5 years time?

The Outlook for the Residential Construction Industry Hunter and the Central Coast

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014

The Economic Impact of Tourism Eastbourne Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

REPORT TO REPORT PREPARED FOR THE PORT HEDLAND INDUSTRIES COUNCIL AN ECONOMIC STUDY OF PORT HEDLAND PORT

REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TOURISM. Raleigh, North Carolina

AIRPORT: Yakima Air Terminal (YKM) ASSOCIATED CITY: Yakima ARC: C-III Region: South Central

Travel and Tourism in Denmark to 2017

The Economic Impact of Tourism West Oxfordshire Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The 2001 Economic Impact of Connecticut s Travel and Tourism Industry

Economic contribution of the Qantas Group to Australia in FY17. Economic contribution of the Qantas Group to Australia in FY17 The Qantas Group

Tourism Satellite Account: Demand-Supply Reconciliation

La Trobe University s Regional Economic Contribution

Estimation of Tourism Employment through Tourism Satellite Account Indian Experience

South Dakota Tourism IHS Consulting

Canada. Advancing. Together.

Tom Phillips and Peter Valerio

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Oxfordshire Estimates for 2013

Long-term Trends in Auckland s Business Demographics

2012 Americas School of Mines

Oregon Travel Impacts p

uburbs Inner Eastern LLEN Region 27,298 FTE students in Government schools*** 177,361 * 397,525 Total population* 61,631 businesses 202,078 Boroondara

THAILAND HOW DOES TRAVEL & TOURISM COMPARE TO OTHER SECTORS? BENCHMARK REPORT THAILAND 1 SPONSORS OF BENCHMARKING REPORT 2017

Tourism statistics from the supply side perspective: what transpires from the country responses to the UNWTO request for information

AIRPORT: Seattle-Tacoma International (SEA) ASSOCIATED CITY: Seattle ARC: D-V Region: Central Puget Sound

Transcription:

Public Environmental Review Boodarie Waste to Energy and Materials Recovery, Port Hedland Appendix 3 REMPLAN Economic Impact Modelling: New Energy Port Hedland Waste to Energy Project

NEW ENERGY PORT HEDLAND WASTE TO ENERGY PROJECT March 2012

Contents REMPLAN ECONOMIC IMPACT MODELLING... 3 BACKGROUND TO THE PILBARA ECONOMY... 3 THE PROJECT DESCRIPTION PILBARA WASTE TO ENERGY PROJECT... 4 DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY... 4 IMPACT IN THE PILBARA REGIONAL ECONOMY REMPLAN RESULTS... 5 OUTPUT... 5 EMPLOYMENT... 5 SALARIES AND WAGES... 6 VALUE ADDED... 7 GROSS REGIONAL PRODUCT... 7 No person should act on the basis of any matter contained in this document without considering and, if necessary, taking appropriate professional advice. Neither the Commission, nor any of its employees undertake responsibility to any person or organisation in respect to this document.

REMPLAN ECONOMIC IMPACT MODELLING The Pilbara Development Commission has licensed the REMPLAN (Regional Economic and Planning) tool from Compelling Economics. REMPLAN provides economic information at the 4 Local Government Areas in the Pilbara and the ability to model impacts in these economies. The primary datasets of REMPLAN at January 2011 is the: 2006 ABS Census 2007/2008 National input and output tables June 2011 ABS Gross State Product REMPLAN uses localised input / output tables to describe relationships between sectors in the economy. Multipliers are calculated and used to estimate potential economic impacts of increased or decreased activity. Input / output modelling has strengths and weaknesses for further information refer to: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/csrc/publications/reg_eco_model.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/input-output_model BACKGROUND TO THE PILBARA ECONOMY The Pilbara economy is dominated by the mining sector and those supporting sectors such as the construction sector. The Pilbara economy has an estimated output of over $29 billion and a Gross Regional Product in the order of $14 billion. For further background information refer to the paper Pilbara Regional Economy on the PDC website www.pdc.wa.gov.au The Town of Port Hedland has an estimated total output of $4.4 billion and a Gross Regional Product (GRP) of $2.06 billion annually. The economy in the Town centers on the following activities, Mining 58%, Construction 13%, Manufacturing of 6.4% Rental Hiring and Real-estate 5.1%, Transport, Postal and Warehousing of 4.0%. The New Energy Power plant project in the Town of Port Hedland is classified as part of the Electricity, Gas, Water and Waste Services sector which currently is estimated to make up 0.7% of the Town of Port Hedland economy.

THE PROJECT DESCRIPTION PILBARA WASTE TO ENERGY PROJECT Building and operating a power plant that uses waste diverted from landfill. At full capacity the power plant can service 15,000 homes. The project will impact the local economy in two waves, the construction and then the operation. There is currently no data available detailing expenditure on local goods and services during the construction phase. The total project construction is estimated to be $12 million. The operation of the plant is expected to provide ongoing employment for 20 local people. The impact modelling will concentrate on the operational impacts on the local economy of the Town of Port Hedland. DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY Data has been sourced from the new energy website http://www.newenergycorp.com.au/projects/pilbara-wa/

IMPACT IN THE PILBARA REGIONAL ECONOMY REMPLAN RESULTS OUTPUT The Town of Port Hedland has an estimated total output in 2011 of $4.4 billion. 20 operational jobs in the Power Plant represent $43 million of direct annual Output into the economy of the Town of Port Hedland. The impact of $43 million of output in the local economy further stimulate industries and consumption, this output can be estimated at $8.471 Million. This is an Output multiplier of 1.197. Total impact on Output that can be attributed to the establishment of the Waste to Energy Project including the direct, industrial and consumption effects is estimated to be worth $51 million EMPLOYMENT The employment of 20 people at the proposed power plant results in the employment of new people in the regional economy as support business gear up and expenditure of wages makes its way through the economy. The indication is that an extra 18 jobs will be supported in other industries outside the Project, this represent a multiplier of 1.95.

Below details the sectors likely to benefit from the Projects employment multiplier effect. The analysis is at the 111 sector level. According to REMPLAN of the 18 additional jobs the full time jobs are likely to be in the following sectors. Employment Industrial Effect (Jobs) Consumption Effect (Jobs) Total (Jobs)* Electricity Generation 0 0 20 Electricity Distribution 1 0 1 Construction Services 2 0 2 Wholesale Trade 0 0 1 Retail Trade 0 2 3 Accommodation 0 0 0 Food & Beverage Services 0 1 1 Road Transport 1 0 2 Finance 1 0 1 Professional, Scientific & Technical 1 0 1 Services Administration & Support Services 1 0 1 Education & Training 0 1 1 Health Care Services 0 1 1 Automotive Repair & Maintenance 0 0 1 Other Repair & Maintenance 0 0 0 *only full time jobs are detailed SALARIES AND WAGES It is estimated by the REMPLAN system that 20 people at the Waste to Energy Project will receive a total of approximately $3.986 million in salaries and wages. The flow on effect of supporting an additional 18 jobs elseware in the local economy will mean these businesses can pay their employees up to $1.762 million in Salaries and Wages. This represents a wage and salaries multiplier of 1.442

VALUE ADDED The Port Hedland local economy is estimated to have a Value Added of $1.989 billion annually. The Waste to Energy Project is estimated to generate direct Value Added of $15.673 million. Due to purchasing and expenditure in the local economy the projects gives other businesses a chance to also add value, this is estimated to be worth $4.03 million of value added. A Value Added multiplier of 1.257 The Waste to Energy Project can be attributed to a total of $19.699 million of Value Added across the sectors. GROSS REGIONAL PRODUCT The Gross Regional Product of the Town of Port Hedland is estimated to be $2.067 billion. With an identified 38 jobs and output provided by the PHPA, the PHPA represent 0.95% of the Town of Port Hedland s Gross Regional Product. Below is a table detailing the impact on local Gross Regional Product of the Waste to Energy Project in the Town of Port Hedland economy. GRP Expenditure Method Before $M Impact $M Change % Household Consumption $720.374 $736.090 2.18 % Government Consumption $220.683 $220.975 0.13 % Private Gross Fixed Capital $343.159 $344.869 0.50 % Expenditure Public Gross Fixed Capital $64.067 $65.066 1.56 % Expenditure Gross Regional Expenses $1,348.283 $1,366.999 1.39 % plus Exports $3,090.351 $3,091.647 0.04 % minus Domestic Imports -$2,135.524 -$2,161.012 1.19 % minus Overseas Imports -$235.228 -$235.634 0.17 % balancing item $0.000 $25.581 Gross Regional Product $2,067.881 $2,087.580