Grow the Economy Briefing note

Similar documents
Inclusive Growth Calderdale project data pack

Inclusive Growth indicators: Core city and GM Local Authority comparisons

Care Home Live Bed State System. North East & North Cumbria UEC Network. Jonathan Maloney Programme Director. 5 th July 2018

Inclusive Growth (IG) Monitor 2017: Local Enterprise Partnerships Anthony Rafferty, Ceri Hughes, & Ruth Lupton

1. Output GVA data for LEPs , ONS Feb 2016

Portrait of the North West

East Lothian. Skills Assessment January SDS-1154-Jan16

North Lanarkshire. Skills Assessment January SDS-1163-Jan16

Doncaster Chamber of Commerce. Andy Taylor Head of Public Affairs, HS2 Ltd

Planned Expenditure by Local Authorities: Services for Young People

APPENDIX 8. Leeds Socio-Economic Baseline Report. Report. July Metro and Leeds City Council

Facts and figures 2019

July 2016 Employment and Skills Briefing

West London Economic Assessment

East Lancashire Highways and Transport Masterplan East Lancashire Rail Connectivity Study Conditional Output Statement (Appendix 'A' refers)

Healthwatch is the independent champion for people who use health and social care services.

LEEDS ECONOMY HANDBOOK. April 2016 THE LEEDS ECONOMY. The Leeds Economy

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

2. Recommendations 2.1 Board members are asked to: i. note the content of the May 2018 Renfrewshire Economic Profile.

England s Seaside Towns: a benchmarking study. Prof Steve Fothergill CRESR, Sheffield Hallam University

Report of the Strategic Director of Place to the meeting of Executive to be held on 11 September 2018

Visitor Attractions Trends in England 2017

SHETLAND AREA PROFILE

Key Stats. 2.6 Percentage points. 1,050 New Jobs Filled Since launch 0.7% 17.7% 35.5% 230 Since last year 2.2% 14.8% Economy. Labour Market and Skills

City employment: An overview from the Business Register & Employment Survey (BRES)

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014

Numbers achieving 3 A grades in specific A-Level combinations by school type and LEA

WAVERLEY TOPS ANNUAL RURAL AREAS QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY

S31 Grant determination for a high needs strategic planning fund in : DCLG ref 31/2916

Chapter 1: The Population of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Embargoed until 30/03/2012

CAMPBELTOWN PROFILE May 2014

Visitor Attractions Trends in England 2016

School improvement monitoring and brokering grant provisional allocations for illustrative purposes

Economic Impact of Tourism. Norfolk

CALDERDALE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Uttlesford takes the crown as Britain s best rural area to live

Greater Manchester Talent Match Impact report For local authorities and host organisations

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Visitor Attractions Trends in England 2014

February 2016 Employment and Skills Briefing

Commissioned by: Economic Impact of Tourism. Stevenage Results. Produced by: Destination Research

The Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011

Economic Impact of Tourism. Hertfordshire Results. Commissioned by: Visit Herts. Produced by:

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Norfolk Action. Norfolk s Local Area Agreement

DUNOON PROFILE May 2014

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

CALDERDALE LOCAL PLAN TRANSPORT EVIDENCE

Economic Impact of Tourism. Cambridgeshire 2010 Results

Re-opening of the Skipton to Colne Railway Executive Summary

Liverpool City Region Today:

LSOA IMD Rank (1= most deprived)

The Economic Impact of Tourism New Forest Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

NOT FOR BROADCAST OR PUBLICATION BEFORE 00:01, TUESDAY 1 MARCH 2016

Employment and Skills Briefing (March 2015)

Construction Industry Focus Survey. Sample

The Government s Aviation Strategy Transport for the North (TfN) response

AVIATION. January Aviation INDUSTRY PROFILE. for Arapahoe & Douglas Counties Colorado WIOA Central Planning Region

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Thessaloniki Chamber of Commerce & Industry TCCI BAROMETER. Palmos Analysis Ltd.

Norfolk s Story October 2017

Living on the edge: The impact of travel costs on low paid workers living in outer London executive summary. living on the edge 1

International economic context and regional impact

Contents Manningham at a Glance... 6 Location and Area... 6 Manningham Activity Centres... 6 Manningham Suburbs... 6 Population... 8 Forecast... 9 For

Section A: Scheme Summary

DINGWALL PROFILE May 2014

Better skills, more good jobs and a growing economy

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas

A focus on education, employment and skills. Towards a sustainable Heathrow

Economic Contribution of Tourism to NSW

Swaziland. HDI values and rank changes in the 2013 Human Development Report

Self Catering Holidays in England Economic Impact 2015

Invest NorthTyneside. Demographics

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Buncombe County, North Carolina

Shrinking cities: a view from Britain. Brian Robson

PORTREE PROFILE May 2014

Why Manchester? Manchester Key Facts & Figures Publication Autumn 2017

The Economic Impact of Tourism Eastbourne Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Does space matter? Housing, transport and accessibility in GM Cecilia Wong, Andreas Schulze Baing, Moozhan Shakeri & Jonathan Smith

Shortest Response Times Longest Response Times 0:03:14 0:42:55 0:04:23 0:44:11 0:04:35 2:00:04

Getting our Priorities Right

PPP DATABASE Strategic Service-Delivery Partnerships for local authority ICT, corporate and technical services in Britain.

PQ Local Authorities with exceedances of NO 2 annual mean limit value (based on 2015

A COMPARISON OF THE MILWAUKEE METROPOLITAN AREA TO ITS PEERS

Demographic Profile 2013 census

Regional Universities Network. Introduction. Regional Universities Network. Economic Impact of the Universities in the Regional Universities Network

Tayside. Skills Assessment January SDS-1186-Feb16

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Canterbury Results. Produced by: Destination Research

UK household giving new results on regional trends

The Economic Impact of BT Group plc in Northern Ireland

HEALTH SECTOR ECONOMIC INDICATORS REPORT

IT S YOUR AREA. what s important? TYWYN AREA. WELL-BEING ASSESSMENT GWYNEDD AND MÔN Gwynedd and Môn Public Services Board

Glasgow and Clyde Valley

East Dunbartonshire Area Profile

Where to live Britain s best country life

Transcription:

Grow the Economy Briefing note Key messages March 2018 The Calderdale economy has shown resilience and consistent growth in the last five years. Since 2012 overall borough performance across a range of economic metrics has improved in line with national trends. These metrics show the economy is achieving strong results when compared with its Best Borough in the North 1 local authority neighbours and the Leeds City region 2. For example: Jobs employment rates Calderdale s employment rate has been higher than the average for Leeds City Region and England for five years in a row. In September 2017 it was 76.3%. This is the fourth highest rate within both the Best Borough in the North comparator group and third highest in the Leeds City Region. See table 1 and figure 1 in Appendix A for more information. Jobs number of jobs The number of jobs in Calderdale increased from 97,000 in 2012 to 111,000 in 2016. The number of jobs per resident of working age has remained consistently higher than the average for the Leeds City region and Best Borough in the North comparator groups in the last five years. In 2016 there were 0.85 employee jobs per working age resident, a slight reduction on 0.86 for 2015. It was the fourth highest in the Leeds City Region and second highest in the Best Borough in the North comparator group. See table 2 and figure 2 in Appendix A for more information. Jobs private sector Calderdale s private sector has expanded in the last five years. There were 8,985 private sector work places in the borough in 2017 compared with 7,635 in 2012 an 18% increase. In 2016 there were 42.1 private sector work places per 1,000 residents, the fourth highest rate in the Leeds City Region and third highest within the Best Borough North comparator group. See table 3 and figure 3 in Appendix A for more information. Further information See Appendix B for a snapshot of Financial vulnerability for households in Calderdale in May 2017 using the Experian Financial vulnerability model. The Joseph Rowntree Foundation has identified a list of 18 Inclusive Growth monitor indicators. See Appendix C for a summary of recent results for Calderdale compared with its Best Borough in the North local authority neighbours and Leeds City Region. Data sets that underpin the metrics in this report are available on Calderdale Data Works open data website. Performance and Business Intelligence Team Calderdale Council 23 March 2018 performance.businessintelligence@calderdale.gov.uk 1 Best Borough in the North is a list of 20 authorities across the North of England including Calderdale. Calderdale Council benchmarks its corporate performance on selected metrics against this list. The authorities are: Barnsley, Bolton, Bury, Calderdale, Doncaster, Gateshead, Kirklees, Knowsley, North Tyneside, Oldham, Rochdale, Rotherham, Sefton, South Tyneside, St Helens, Stockport, Tameside, Trafford, Wigan and Wirral. 2 Leeds City Region is a Local Enterprise Region for ten local authorities in Yorkshire. These are Barnsley, Bradford, Calderdale, Craven, Harrogate, Kirklees, Leeds, Selby, Wakefield and York. 1

Appendix A Jobs employment rates Table 1: Percentage of working age population in employment (employment rate) Area Sep 2012 Sep 2013 Sep 2014 Sep 2015 Sep 2016 Sep 2017 Calderdale 70.2% 72.3% 74.6% 76.6% 76.1% 76.3% Best Borough in the North average 68.2% 69.2% 69.8% 71.9% 71.5% 72.3% Leeds City Region 69.0% 70.1% 70.0% 72.5% 73.0% 73.3% England 70.5% 71.2% 72.3% 73.5% 74.1% 74.7% Figure 1: Percentage of working age population in employment (employment rate) 78.0% 76.0% 74.0% 72.0% 70.0% 68.0% 66.0% Sep 12 Sep 13 Sep 14 Sep 15 Sep 16 Sep 17 Calderdale Best Borough in the North average Leeds City Region England Data source: Annual Population Survey https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=17 accessed 26 February 2018 2

Jobs number of jobs Table 2: Number of employee jobs by working-age population (jobs density) Area 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Calderdale 0.74 0.78 0.84 0.86 0.85 Best Borough in the North average 0.64 0.65 0.67 0.69 0.70 Leeds City Region 0.75 0.76 0.78 0.81 0.81 England 0.79 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.85 Figure 2: Number of employee jobs by working-age population (jobs density) 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.75 0.70 0.65 0.60 0.55 0.50 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Calderdale Best Borough in the North average Leeds City Region Data source: ONS (Office for National Statistics) Jobs Density series https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=57 accessed 26 February 2018 3

Jobs private sector Table 3: Number of private sector workplaces per 1,000 resident population Area 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Calderdale 37.2 37.1 38.3 41.2 42.1 Best Borough in the North average 29.4 29.4 30.4 33.1 34.2 Leeds City Region 34.0 34.0 35.0 38.0 38.6 England 39.9 40.0 41.4 44.1 45.5 Figure 3: Number of private sector workplaces per 1,000 resident population 50 45 40 35 30 25 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Calderdale Best Borough in the North average Leeds City Region England Data source: UK Business Counts - Local Units https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=141 accessed 15 February 2018 4

Appendix B: Financial vulnerability The Experian Financial vulnerability model gives insight into the proportion of households across Calderdale that are financially vulnerable. See table 4 and figure 4 for a summary of the 30% most vulnerable by ward. Ward Table 4: Experian Financial vulnerability model (FVM) results by ward: May 2017 FVM 10% most vulnerable FVM >10% to 20% most vulnerable FVM >20% to 30% most vulnerable Park 42% 31% 9% Ovenden 39% 18% 12% Town 17% 27% 15% Illingworth and Mixenden 24% 12% 12% Todmorden 7% 20% 16% Warley 13% 19% 10% Sowerby Bridge 8% 19% 15% Elland 9% 18% 14% Brighouse 7% 14% 11% Rastrick 12% 11% 8% Luddendenfoot 4% 6% 11% Greetland and Stainland 3% 8% 8% Ryburn 6% 6% 6% Calder 2% 7% 10% Hipperholme and Lightcliffe 5% 3% 8% Skircoat 2% 6% 8% Northowram and Shelf 1% 3% 5% Calderdale 12% 14% 11% Description of the Experian Financial vulnerability model This model is created using 14 Experian models, with a weighting applied to each variable (according to the perceived strength of relationship with financial vulnerability - some variables are given higher importance than others): 1. Financial strategy segments factor A (Financial stability) 2. Financial strategy segments factor E (Level of income) 3. Financial strategy segments factor F (Financial security) 4. Mosaic UK factor A (High status - Low status) 5. Do not have a personal current account 6. Have used an unauthorised overdraft in the last year 7. Estimated value of assets - zero 8. Have fallen behind with many bills / credit commitments 9. Do not have any debt problems 10. Have applied for credit and found it hard to obtain 11. Currently being actively pursued for overdue bills / credit commitment 12. Use a Credit Union 13. Use home collected credit 14. Have used a loan for debt consolidation Each household in the UK is scored within each of the 14 models and then within the resultant financial vulnerability score. This score is then aggregated into 10 deciles, and 100 percentiles. 5

Figure 4: Experian Financial vulnerability model (FVM) results by ward in Calderdale: May 2017 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% FVM 10% most vulnerable FVM >10% to 20% most vulnerable FVM >20% to 30% most vulnerable 6

Appendix C Inclusive Growth Calderdale project data pack JRF Inclusive Growth Monitor Indicators: Calderdale results compared with Best Borough in the North authorities and Leeds City Region Updated 26 February 2018 Performance and Business Intelligence Team Calderdale Council Email: performance.businessintelligence@calderdale.gov.uk 7

Inclusive Growth what is it? The OECD defines Inclusive as economic growth that creates opportunity for all segments of the population and distributes the dividends of increased prosperity, both in monetary and non-monetary terms, fairly across society. Nationally, there s been much discussion about JAMS (just about managing), Left Behind Britain, the Gig economy etc, and in the past year the RSA (Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce) have published the report of their Inclusive Growth Commission, and Matthew Taylor has undertaken a review on modern employment practices. However, there is still a national productivity gap, with the North lagging behind London and the South-East. Even within our own region, the inequality gap between richest and poorest continues to widen. In West Yorkshire, the Combined Authority set up an Inclusive Growth Group, supported by a Core Team of officers from across the region, and in Calderdale we are developing our own Inclusive Economic Strategy. The Joseph Rowntree Foundation have identified a list of 18 Inclusive Growth Monitor Indicators which they feel will provide a good benchmark of how an area is performing. The attached data pack looks at each of those datasets in turn and compares Calderdale with Best Borough in the North authorities and the Leeds City Region average. Steve Barnbrook Inclusive Growth Calderdale Project Lead Calderdale Council 8

Index Theme Topic Indicator (click on link to view data) Full description of Indicator Leeds City Region rank* (out of 10 unless stated; 1 = best) Best Borough in the North rank # (out of 20 unless stated; 1 = best) Inclusion Income Out of work benefits Percentage of working-age population receiving out-of-work 7 5 benefits In work tax credits Percentage of in-work households with and without children Not available Not available receiving Child and / or Working tax credits Low earnings 20th percentile of gross weekly earnings (20% of full-time 3 5 workers receive earnings equal to or below this threshold) Living costs Housing affordability Ratio of lower quartile house price to lower quartile earnings 2 5 Housing costs Median monthly rents for private sector two bedroom Joint 2nd with 3 8 properties local authorities Fuel poverty Percentage of households classed as being 'fuel poor' (using 8 19 Low income - High costs model) Labour Unemployment Percentage of working-age population not in employment but 2 1 market exclusion Economic inactivity actively seeking and available to start work Percentage of working-age population who are economically 6 5 inactive Workless households Percentage of working age households with no one in work 5 4 Prosperity Output Output Gross Value Added (GVA) per capita 6 5 growth Private sector business Number of private sector workplaces per 1,000 resident 4 3 population Wages and earnings Median gross weekly pay for full-time workers 6 10 Employment Workplace jobs Employee jobs by working-age population (jobs density) 4 2 People in employment Percentage of working age population in employment 3 4 (employment rate) Employment in knowledge Percentage of employees in Knowledge intensive services or Not relevant Not relevant intensive services and High-tech manufacturing sectors High-tech manufacturing industries Human capital Higher level occupations Percentage of workers in managerial, professional and technical / scientific occupations (SOCs 1, 2 and 3) Not relevant Not relevant Working age population qualifications NVQ 2 and above Educational attainment Percentage of working-age population qualified at NVQ Level 2 and above Percentage of pupils at the end of Key stage 4 achieving 5 or more GCSEs or equivalent at grades A* to C (including English and Mathematics) 7 14 2 out of 7 5 9

* Leeds City Region is a Local Enterprise Region for ten local authorities in Yorkshire. These are Barnsley, Bradford, Calderdale, Craven, Harrogate, Kirklees, Leeds, Selby, Wakefield and York. # Best Borough in the North is a list of 20 authorities across the North of England including Calderdale. Calderdale Council benchmarks its corporate performance on selected metrics against this list. The authorities are: Barnsley, Bolton, Bury, Calderdale, Doncaster, Gateshead, Kirklees, Knowsley, North Tyneside, Oldham, Rochdale, Rotherham, Sefton, South Tyneside, St Helens, Stockport, Tameside, Trafford, Wigan and Wirral. 10

Inclusion theme: Income Percentage of working-age population receiving out-of-work benefits Table 1ai: Percentage of working-age population receiving out-of-work benefits Area Nov 2011 Nov 2012 Nov 2013 Nov 2014 Nov 2015 Nov 2016 Calderdale 16.1% 15.9% 15.1% 14.2% 13.1% 12.5% Best Borough in the North average 18.3% 18.0% 17.0% 15.8% 14.9% 14.1% Leeds City Region 15.5% 15.3% 14.4% 13.6% 12.8% 12.1% England 14.1% 13.8% 12.9% 12.1% 11.4% 10.7% Figure 1ai: Percentage of working-age population receiving out-of-work benefits 19.0% 18.0% 17.0% 16.0% 15.0% 14.0% 13.0% 12.0% 11.0% 10.0% Nov-11 Nov 12 Nov 13 Nov 14 Nov 15 Nov 16 Calderdale Best Borough in the North average Leeds City Region England Data source: DWP (Department for Work and Pensions) Work and Pensions Longitudinal study (benefit claimants - working-age client group), https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=105 accessed 26 February 2018 11

Inclusion theme: Income Percentage of in-work households with and without children receiving Child and / or Working tax credits Table 1aii a: Total in-work families in receipt of HMRC Working tax and Child tax credits ('000s) Area 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 Calderdale 16.5 12.6 12.4 12.4 12.0 Leeds City Region total 224.0 170.0 170.0 170.0 167.0 Best Borough in the North total 381.0 287.0 285.0 284.0 299.0 Data source: HMRC (HM Revenue and Customs) Child and Working tax credit finalised award ttatistics - Geographical statistic, https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/personal-tax-credits-statistics, accessed 2 January 2018 Table 1aii b: Percentage of Households in receipt of HMRC Working tax and Child tax credits Area 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 Leeds City Region 28% 21% 21% 20% Data source: Leeds City Region results from JRF Inclusive Growth monitor 2017 file "IGMonitor-2017-dataset.xlsx", sheet "A. Indicator levels" http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/mui/igau/growthmonitor/2017/igmonitor-2017-dataset.xlsx accessed 26 February 2018 Figure 1aii a: Total in-work families in receipt of HMRC Working tax and Child tax credits ('000s): Calderdale 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 12

Inclusion theme: Income 20th percentile of gross weekly earnings # : Leeds City Region Table and figure 1aiii a: 20th percentile of gross weekly earnings: Leeds City Region authorities Area 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Harrogate 331.80 334.20 324.00 326.90 346.00 363.70 375.20 Leeds 329.00 335.40 345.00 334.70 345.00 359.10 364.40 Calderdale 316.50 329.20 317.10 323.80 341.00 357.90 359.50 York 318.40 327.40 336.60 345.00 345.20 349.90 357.10 Selby 345.90 334.50 351.40 352.40 364.00 362.70 357.00 Wakefield 300.10 306.40 316.00 318.40 334.50 332.00 353.60 Kirklees 317.20 322.00 325.80 334.70 336.30 348.80 352.50 Barnsley 316.70 328.10 323.10 328.00 325.00 332.90 347.20 Bradford 296.00 306.40 312.70 311.90 324.30 328.10 334.00 Craven 311.50 306.10 293.40 308.20 318.80 309.10 330.80 Leeds City Region 317.00 323.70 328.20 328.00 338.00 370.00 360.00 350.00 340.00 330.00 320.00 310.00 300.00 290.00 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Calderdale Leeds City Region Data sources: Individual authority results from NOMIS, annual survey of hours and earnings - resident analysis 2006 to 2016, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=30, accessed 16 February 2018 Leeds City Region results from JRF Inclusive Growth monitor 2017 file "IGMonitor-2017-dataset.xlsx", sheet "A. Indicator levels", http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/mui/igau/growthmonitor/2017/igmonitor-2017-dataset.xlsx accessed 26 February 2018 Note: # 20% of full-time workers receive earnings equal to or below this threshold. 13

Inclusion theme: Income 20th percentile of gross weekly earnings # : Best Borough in the North authorities Table 1aiii b: 20th percentile of gross weekly earnings: Best Borough in the North authorities Area 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Barnsley 316.70 328.10 323.10 328.00 325.00 332.90 347.20 Bolton 287.50 304.10 318.60 307.80 325.70 333.80 334.90 Bury 343.70 323.40 349.30 343.80 353.80 371.90 375.40 Calderdale 316.50 329.20 317.10 323.80 341.00 357.90 359.50 Doncaster 301.50 295.10 299.30 317.80 310.50 326.30 335.50 Gateshead 322.60 330.40 329.60 337.20 333.80 340.60 354.80 Kirklees 317.20 322.00 325.80 334.70 336.30 348.80 352.50 Knowsley 324.10 323.10 312.80 318.10 332.80 342.20 350.50 North Tyneside 317.40 317.40 333.90 341.30 351.40 359.60 368.00 Oldham 300.30 314.40 310.70 320.10 317.50 331.20 343.30 Rochdale 307.70 329.20 320.00 322.00 323.60 333.70 331.20 Rotherham 310.20 306.60 304.80 308.20 315.80 330.90 339.00 Sefton 321.00 325.60 336.00 335.40 331.50 345.00 358.10 South Tyneside 309.70 320.20 318.10 330.00 341.20 344.30 352.40 St. Helens 324.40 307.80 314.30 315.70 323.30 345.30 345.20 Stockport 334.80 344.90 351.10 345.10 363.10 364.50 388.90 Tameside 302.20 308.10 316.50 310.80 328.30 340.40 340.80 Trafford 334.70 355.40 351.90 359.70 359.40 394.00 404.50 Wigan 322.50 322.50 333.00 322.10 341.30 344.70 354.20 Wirral 329.00 334.40 333.60 342.20 345.80 357.80 356.80 Data source: NOMIS, annual survey of hours and earnings - resident analysis, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=30, accessed 26 February 2018 Note: # 20% of full-time workers receive earnings equal to or below this threshold 14

Inclusion theme: Living costs Ratio of lower quartile house price to lower quartile earnings Table 1bi: Ratio of lower quartile house price to lower quartile earnings Area 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Calderdale 4.36 4.64 4.75 4.84 4.59 Best Borough in the North average 4.82 4.89 5.10 5.18 5.16 Leeds City Region 5.92 5.86 6.07 6.21 6.35 England 6.58 6.57 6.91 7.11 7.16 Figure 1bi: Ratio of lower quartile house price to lower quartile earnings 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Calderdale Best Borough in the North average Leeds City Region Data source: LG (Local Government) Inform Ratio of lower quartile house price to lower quartile gross annual (residence-based) earnings, http://www.lginform.local.gov.uk, accessed 26 February 2018 15

Inclusion theme: Living costs Median monthly rents for private sector two bedroom properties : Leeds City Region Table and figure 1bii a: Median monthly rents for private sector two bedroom properties: Leeds City Region Area 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 Barnsley 400 400 400 400 Bradford 450 450 475 475 Calderdale 450 450 455 475 Kirklees 450 450 450 475 Wakefield 475 475 495 495 Selby 500 510 550 525 Craven 500 525 550 550 Leeds 600 598 615 645 Harrogate 650 650 695 695 York Unitary Authority 650 650 695 695 540 520 500 480 460 440 420 400 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 Leeds City Region 521 521 531 Calderdale Leeds City Region Average Data sources: All figures except those for Leeds City Region are from Valuation Office Agency administrative database as at 26 February 2018, Leeds City Region figures from University of Manchester Inclusive Growth Analysis Unit (2017), Joseph Rowntree Foundation Inclusive Growth Monitor Complete data set, https://www.mui.manchester.ac.uk/igau/research/inclusive-growth-indicators/ accessed 26 February 2018. 16

Inclusion theme: Living costs Median monthly rents for private sector two bedroom properties : Best Borough in the North authorities Table 1bii b: Median monthly rents for private sector two bedroom properties: Best Borough in the North authorities Area 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 Barnsley 400 400 400 400 Doncaster 450 450 400 450 Rochdale 450 450 450 450 Rotherham 450 450 450 450 South Tyneside 450 450 450 450 St. Helens 450 450 450 450 Wigan 440 425 450 450 Calderdale 450 450 455 475 Kirklees 450 450 450 475 Wirral 495 479 475 475 Gateshead 475 475 475 480 Bolton 450 450 475 495 Oldham 465 475 475 495 Tameside 475 475 485 495 Knowsley 520 498 495 500 North Tyneside 495 495 500 500 Bury 475 495 525 525 Sefton 550 550 550 550 Stockport 575 575 625 645 Trafford 675 695 700 750 Data source: Valuation Office Agency administrative database as at 26 February 2018, https://data.gov.uk/publisher/valuation-office-agency 17

Inclusion theme: Living costs Percentage of households classed as being 'fuel poor' (using Low income - high cost (LIHC) model): Leeds City Region Table 1biii a: Percentage of households classed as being 'fuel poor' (using LIHC model): Leeds City Region Area 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Calderdale 19.5% 12.1% 11.6% 11.7% 12.2% 13.6% Leeds City Region 18.0% 11.0% 11.0% 11.0% 12.0% Figure 1biii a: Percentage of households classed as being 'fuel poor (using LIHC model): Leeds City Region 20.0% 18.0% 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Calderdale Leeds City Region Data sources: Gov.uk Annual sub-regional poverty data: low income high costs indicator, https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/fuel-poverty-sub-regional-statistics accessed 26 February 2018 18

Inclusion theme: Living costs Percentage of households classed as 'fuel poor' (using Low income - high cost (LIHC) model): Best Borough in the North authorities Table 1biii b: Percentage of households classed as being 'fuel poor' (using LIHC model): Best Borough in the North authorities Area 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Trafford 18.5% 13.1% 11.1% 10.0% 10.4% 9.9% Stockport 18.5% 12.3% 9.7% 9.2% 9.8% 10.2% Rotherham 18.2% 10.1% 9.8% 9.0% 10.5% 10.6% Sefton 20.9% 14.4% 11.4% 10.9% 11.2% 10.9% St. Helens 20.0% 11.3% 10.1% 9.7% 10.3% 10.9% Wigan 19.8% 11.3% 9.4% 9.1% 9.9% 10.9% Knowsley 19.5% 9.9% 10.2% 10.4% 10.7% 11.1% North Tyneside 19.0% 10.7% 9.7% 9.9% 9.9% 11.1% Bury 19.1% 12.4% 10.3% 10.1% 10.4% 11.2% Wirral 20.5% 13.5% 11.2% 10.6% 10.9% 11.2% Barnsley 20.3% 10.9% 9.7% 9.2% 11.3% 11.3% Doncaster 20.1% 11.4% 10.0% 9.8% 11.6% 11.3% Tameside 19.7% 11.9% 10.4% 9.8% 10.2% 11.9% Oldham 19.8% 11.3% 11.2% 10.7% 10.7% 12.1% South Tyneside 21.3% 10.2% 11.0% 11.3% 11.8% 12.3% Rochdale 20.0% 11.5% 11.5% 11.3% 11.4% 12.4% Bolton 19.7% 11.4% 11.4% 11.0% 10.5% 12.5% Gateshead 22.6% 10.9% 11.0% 10.9% 11.2% 12.7% Calderdale 19.5% 12.1% 11.6% 11.7% 12.2% 13.6% Kirklees 18.9% 11.5% 12.0% 11.8% 11.6% 14.0% Data sources: Gov.uk Annual sub-regional poverty data: low income high costs indicator, https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/fuel-poverty-sub-regional-statistics accessed 26 February 2018 19

Inclusion theme: Labour market exclusion Unemployment rate aged 16 64 years Table 1ci: Unemployment rate - aged 16-64 years Area Sep 2012 Sep 2013 Sep 2014 Sep 2015 Sep 2016 Sep 2017 Calderdale 8.7% 7.6% 6.5% 4.4% 4.0% 2.0% Best Borough in the North average 9.5% 8.9% 8.0% 6.2% 5.8% 4.6% Leeds City Region 8.7% 8.6% 7.9% 6.1% 5.3% 5.0% England 8.1% 7.9% 6.6% 5.5% 5.1% 4.6% Figure 1ci: Unemployment rate - aged 16-64 years 10.0% 9.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% Sep-12 Sep-13 Sep 14 Sep-15 Sep-16 Sep-17 Calderdale Best Borough in the North average Leeds City Region England Data source: Annual Population Survey, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=17, accessed 26 February 2018 20

Inclusion theme: Labour market exclusion Percentage of working-age population who are economically inactive Table 1cii: Percentage of working-age population who are economically inactive - aged 16-64 years Area Sep 2012 Sep 2013 Sep 2014 Sep 2015 Sep 2016 Sep 2017 Calderdale 23.1% 21.8% 20.2% 19.9% 20.8% 22.2% Best Borough in the North average 24.6% 24.0% 24.2% 23.3% 24.2% 23.9% Leeds City Region 24.5% 23.2% 24.0% 22.8% 22.9% 23.1% England 23.2% 22.6% 22.5% 22.2% 21.9% 21.7% Figure 1cii: Percentage of working-age population who are economically inactive - aged 16-64 years 25.0% 24.0% 23.0% 22.0% 21.0% Calderdale Best Borough in the North average Leeds City Region England 20.0% 19.0% Sep-12 Sep-13 Sep 14 Sep-15 Sep-16 Sep-17 Data source: Annual Population Survey, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=17, accessed 26 February 2018 21

Inclusion theme: Labour market exclusion Percentage of working age households with no one in work Table 1ciii: Percentage of working age households with no one in work Area 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Calderdale 19.3% 18.1% 17.7% 14.6% 14.7% 15.9% Best Borough in the North average 21.5% 21.3% 20.2% 19.1% 17.6% 18.1% Leeds City Region 20.4% 18.6% 17.9% 17.4% 15.8% 16.3% England 18.5% 17.6% 16.7% 15.8% 14.9% 14.6% Figure 1ciii: Percentage of working age households with no one in work 22.0% 21.0% 20.0% 19.0% 18.0% 17.0% 16.0% Calderdale Best Borough in the North average Leeds City Region England 15.0% 14.0% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Data source: Annual Population Survey - Households by combined economic activity status, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=136, accessed 26 February 2018 22

Prosperity theme: Output growth Gross value added (GVA) per capita Table 2ai: Gross value added (GVA) per capita Area 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Calderdale 19,163 19,615 20,235 20,330 20,950 Leeds City Region 19,593 19,925 20,556 20,792 21,341 England 23,184 23,828 24,567 25,624 26,159 Figure 2ai a: Gross value added (GVA) per capita: Calderdale compared with Leeds City Region (LCR) average 22,000 21,000 20,000 19,000 18,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Calderdale Leeds City Region Data sources: Calderdale GVA from ONS Regional GVA(I) by local authority in the UK 31 March 2017, https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/grossvalueaddedgva/datasets/regionalgvaibylocalauthorityintheuk; Leeds City Region GVA from JRF Inclusive Growth monitor 2017 file IGMonitor-2017-dataset.xlsx, sheet A. Indicator levels, http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/mui/igau/growthmonitor/2017/igmonitor-2017-dataset.xlsx accessed 26 February 2018 23

Prosperity theme: Output growth Number of private sector workplaces per 1,000 resident populations Table 2aii: Number of private sector workplaces per 1,000 resident population Area 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Calderdale 37.2 37.1 38.3 41.2 42.1 Best Borough in the North average 29.4 29.4 30.4 33.1 34.2 Leeds City Region 34.0 34.0 35.0 38.0 38.6 England 39.9 40.0 41.4 44.1 45.5 Figure 2aii: Number of private sector workplaces per 1,000 resident population 50 45 40 35 30 Calderdale Best Borough in the North average Leeds City Region England 25 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Data source: ONS (Office for National Statistics) UK Business counts Local units, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=141, accessed 26 February 2018 24

Prosperity theme: Output growth Median gross weekly pay for full-time workers: Leeds City Region Table 2aiii a: Median gross weekly pay for full-time workers: Leeds City Region Area 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Calderdale 515.60 479.70 493.30 503.10 522.10 503.30 Leeds City Region 467.00 483.00 479.00 490.00 England 513.20 520.60 523.60 531.90 544.70 555.80 Figure 2aiii a: Median gross weekly pay for full-time workers: Leeds City Region 580.00 560.00 540.00 520.00 500.00 480.00 460.00 440.00 420.00 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Calderdale Leeds City Region England Data sources: Local authority results from NOMIS, Annual survey of hours and earnings resident analysis, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=30, accessed 26 February 2018 Leeds City Region results from JRF Inclusive growth monitor 2017 file IGMonitor-2017-dataset.xlsx, sheet A. Indicator levels, http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/mui/igau/growthmonitor/2017/igmonitor-2017-dataset.xlsx, accessed 26 February 2019 25

Prosperity theme: Output growth Median gross weekly pay for full-time workers: Best Borough in the North authorities Table 2aiii : Median gross weekly pay for full-time workers: Best Borough in the North comparator group Area 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Trafford 561.50 567.40 574.20 568.20 564.40 602.10 602.00 Stockport 497.30 517.40 537.10 522.00 540.00 547.20 565.40 North Tyneside 456.60 454.40 479.40 460.80 503.00 514.80 545.50 Bury 497.90 496.80 493.00 501.30 519.80 524.60 541.90 Wirral 476.50 497.90 503.10 496.10 518.60 523.70 529.50 Sefton 469.10 480.00 487.60 494.00 473.70 510.80 524.00 Wigan 458.10 471.10 491.10 481.60 502.40 500.00 516.30 Knowsley 434.50 451.00 463.80 462.70 475.50 476.50 511.90 Kirklees 463.90 478.50 488.20 479.70 480.80 494.40 506.10 Calderdale 462.30 515.60 479.70 493.30 503.10 522.10 503.30 St. Helens 482.10 479.20 450.20 475.20 479.10 500.00 498.00 Gateshead 456.90 465.70 475.20 486.60 486.50 487.30 495.70 Barnsley 447.60 465.00 479.70 486.70 469.60 476.80 494.70 Rotherham 450.90 462.80 447.60 457.30 481.10 485.20 494.00 Oldham 411.50 425.70 429.90 457.70 442.50 469.90 485.10 Doncaster 462.50 449.60 461.90 482.50 467.00 479.10 479.40 Tameside 420.10 429.30 423.00 432.30 447.00 460.00 479.20 Bolton 436.60 431.30 465.30 442.40 469.10 465.50 476.70 South Tyneside 446.10 450.20 454.40 464.60 473.60 466.90 475.30 Rochdale 446.00 477.30 458.10 458.30 463.40 470.50 464.20 Data source: Local authority results from NOMIS, Annual survey of hours and earnings resident analysis, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=30, accessed 26 February 2018 26

Prosperity theme: Employment Employee jobs by working-age population (jobs density) Table 2bi: Number of employee jobs by working-age population (jobs density) Area 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Calderdale 0.74 0.78 0.84 0.86 0.85 Best Borough in the North average 0.64 0.65 0.67 0.69 0.70 Leeds City Region 0.75 0.76 0.78 0.81 0.81 England 0.79 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.85 Figure 2bi: Number of employee jobs by working-age population (jobs density) 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.75 0.70 0.65 0.60 0.55 0.50 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Calderdale Best Borough in the North average Leeds City Region England Data source: ONS (Office for National Statistics) Jobs Density series, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=57, accessed 26 February 2018 27

Prosperity theme: Employment Percentage of working age population in employment (employment rate) Table 2bii: Percentage of working age population in employment (employment rate) Area Sep 2012 Sep 2013 Sep 2014 Sep 2015 Sep 2016 Sep 2017 Calderdale 70.2% 72.3% 74.6% 76.6% 76.1% 76.3% Best Borough in the North average 68.2% 69.2% 69.8% 71.9% 71.5% 72.3% Leeds City Region 69.0% 70.1% 70.0% 72.5% 73.0% 73.3% England 70.5% 71.2% 72.3% 73.5% 74.1% 74.7% Figure 2bii: Percentage of working age population in employment (employment rate) 78.0% 76.0% 74.0% 72.0% 70.0% 68.0% Calderdale Best Borough in the North average Leeds City Region 66.0% Sep 12 Sep 13 Sep 14 Sep 15 Sep 16 Sep 17 Data source: Annual Population Survey, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=17, accessed 26 February 2018 28

Prosperity theme: Employment Percentage of employees in Knowledge intensive services or High-tech manufacturing industries Figure 2biii: Percentage of employees in Knowledge intensive services or High-tech manufacturing industries: Leeds City Region 49% 48% 48% 47% 47% 46% 46% 45% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Data source: Leeds City Region results from JRF Inclusive Growth monitor 2017 file IGMonitor-2017-dataset.xlsx, sheet A. Indicator Levels, http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/mui/igau/growthmonitor/2017/igmonitor-2017-dataset.xlsx accessed 26 February 2018 29

Prosperity theme: Human capital Percentage of workers in managerial, professional and technical / scientific occupations (standard occupational classifications (SOCs) 1, 2 and 3) Table 2ci: Percentage of workers in managerial, professional and technical scientific occupations (SOCs 1, 2 and 3) Area Sep 2012 Sep 2013 Sep 2014 Sep 2015 Sep 2016 Sep 2017 Calderdale 44.3% 45.0% 47.2% 45.9% 45.0% 45.7% Best Borough in the North average 39.3% 39.2% 39.1% 39.5% 40.4% 40.9% Leeds City Region 39.8% 40.9% 41.3% 40.9% 41.7% 42.0% England 44.0% 44.2% 44.8% 44.6% 45.6% 45.9% Figure 2ci: Percentage of workers in managerial, professional and technical scientific occupations (SOCs 1, 2 and 3) 49.0% 47.0% 45.0% 43.0% 41.0% 39.0% Calderdale Best Borough in the North average Leeds City Region England 37.0% Sep-12 Sep-13 Sep 14 Sep-15 Sep-16 Sep-17 Data source: Annual Population Survey, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=17, accessed 26 February 2018 30

Prosperity theme: Human capital Percentage of working-age population qualified at National vocational qualification (NVQ) Level 2 and above Table 2cii: Percentage of working-age population qualified at NVQ Level 2 and above Area 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Calderdale 67.2% 68.9% 70.3% 73.7% 72.3% 68.6% Best Borough in the North average 66.4% 69.0% 69.4% 71.1% 71.7% 71.2% Leeds City Region 66.5% 68.5% 69.2% 69.9% 70.1% 69.5% England 69.3% 71.7% 72.4% 73.2% 73.4% 74.2% Figure 2cii: Percentage of working-age population qualified at NVQ Level 2 and above 76.0% 74.0% 72.0% 70.0% 68.0% 66.0% Calderdale Best Borough in the North average Leeds City Region England 64.0% 62.0% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Data Source: Annual Population Survey, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=17, accessed 26 February 2018 31

Prosperity theme: Human capital Percentage of pupils at the end of Key stage (KS) 4 achieving 5 or more GCSEs or equivalent at grades A* to C (including English and Mathematics) Table 2ciii a: Percentage of pupils at the end of KS 4 achieving 5 or more GCSEs or equivalent at grades A* to C (including English and Mathematics) Area 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Calderdale 61.1% 65.7% 58.2% 61.8% 60.4% Leeds City Region 57.0% 60.0% 54.0% 56.0% England 59.4% 59.2% 53.4% 53.8% 53.5% Figure 2ciii a: Percentage of pupils at the end of KS 4 achieving 5 or more GCSEs or equivalent at grades A* to C (including English and Mathematics) 70.0% 65.0% 60.0% 55.0% 50.0% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Calderdale Leeds City Region England Data sources: Calderdale and England results from DfE (Department for Education) LAIT tool https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/local-authority-interactive-tool-lait, accessed 2 February 2018, Leeds City Region results from JRF Inclusive Growth monitor 2017 file IGMonitor-2017-dataset.xlsx, sheet A. Indicator Levels;, http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/mui/igau/growthmonitor/2017/igmonitor-2017-dataset.xlsx, accessed 26 February 2018 32

Prosperity theme: Human capital Percentage of pupils at the end of Key stage (KS) 4 achieving 5 or more GCSEs or equivalent at grades A* to C (including English and Mathematics): Best Borough in the North authorities Table 2ciii b: Percentage of pupils at the end of KS 4 achieving 5 or more GCSEs or equivalent at grades A* to C (including English and Mathematics) - Best Borough in the North authorities Area 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Trafford 72.4% 70.5% 72.2% 70.7% 71.4% North Tyneside 61.9% 64.8% 56.2% 62.0% 62.7% Wirral 65.4% 66.2% 60.0% 61.9% 62.2% Stockport 65.0% 65.8% 58.3% 58.3% 61.9% Calderdale 61.1% 65.7% 60.0% 61.8% 60.4% Gateshead 60.6% 61.7% 58.5% 58.1% 59.0% Rotherham 60.0% 63.6% 57.3% 55.2% 58.2% Wigan 64.2% 63.8% 58.0% 57.7% 58.2% Tameside 56.8% 59.4% 53.7% 57.3% 58.0% South Tyneside 58.2% 59.2% 54.0% 57.9% 57.5% Bury 63.0% 62.3% 56.9% 55.4% 57.3% Kirklees 62.0% 62.6% 56.0% 56.9% 55.6% Barnsley 45.3% 50.3% 47.1% 49.5% 55.2% Doncaster 54.7% 56.6% 49.4% 50.1% 55.0% Sefton 58.5% 60.9% 55.0% 54.9% 54.8% Bolton 60.2% 60.7% 57.3% 56.8% 54.0% St. Helens 55.1% 55.5% 55.2% 54.7% 53.9% Rochdale 52.0% 56.2% 54.0% 48.4% 53.2% Oldham 55.9% 57.0% 52.4% 50.5% 51.6% Knowsley 40.9% 43.7% 35.4% 37.4% 36.4% Data source: DfE (Department for Education) LAIT tool, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/local-authority-interactive-tool-lait, accessed 2 February 2018 33