TRANSPORTATION SERVICE Actual

Similar documents
Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

Sound Transit Operations March 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations December 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations January 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations February 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

ATTACHMENT A.7. Transit Division Performance Measurements Report Fiscal Year Fourth Quarter

Sound Transit Operations August 2015 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations June 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations January 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015

PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

Board of Directors Information Summary

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

Sound Transit Operations January 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode

About This Report GAUGE INDICATOR. Red. Orange. Green. Gold

Sound Transit Operations March 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode

September 2014 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management Sub-Regional Report PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Transit Performance Report FY (JUNE 30, 2007)

YOSEMITE AREA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

ESCAMBIA COUNTY AREA TRANSIT MTAC REPORT

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER 2017

AirportInfo. Airport Operating Expenses

DRT Performance Measurement: the U.S. Experience

Operational Performance

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT DECEMBER 2015

PERFORMANCE REPORT JANUARY Keith A. Clinkscale Performance Manager

2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report

Proposition E: Municipal Transportation Quality Review

Subject: Evaluation of Air Carrier s Management of Significant Changes Assessment of Impact of Financial Stress on Safety of Operations

Quarterly Performance Measurement Report

1 YORK REGION TRANSIT/ VIVA SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Monthly Performance Report

The Boulder (and Boulder County) Experience. June 6 th, 2017 RTD s Pass Program Working Group 2 nd Meeting

MERRIMACK VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MVRTA) PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FIXED ROUTE

Bus Operations Report

Aviation Operating Administration/Executive

General Issues Committee Item Transit Operating Budget Ten Year Local Transit Strategy

VCTC Transit Ridership and Performance Measures Quarterly Report

Transit System Performance Update

Service Performance 2010 Networked Family of Services

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

Various Counties MINUTE ORDER Page 1 of I

Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

Service Performance 2013 Networked Family of Services

Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development

METRO OPERATIONS COMMITTEE

Scorecard Key Performance Indicators

8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT

1 DEMAND RESPONSE OVERVIEW

Administrative Operations Report

OCTA s ACCESS Service The Way to Go!!!!

Service Performance 2012 Networked Family of Services

All Door Boarding Title VI Service Fare Analysis. Appendix P.3

AGENDA GUEMES ISLAND FERRY OPERATIONS PUBLIC FORUM

Chapter 3. Burke & Company

FY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission

Performance Measures Year End Updated-

STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES AUTHORITY AUDIT REPORT

The 15-day comment period will run from Thursday, April 4, 2019 to 4pm on Wednesday April 18, 2019.

PTN-128 Reporting Manual Data Collection and Performance Reporting

Appendix A: Regional Fare Policy, SANDAG

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

FIXED ROUTE DASHBOARD JULY 2018

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

St. Johns County Transit Development Plan Update

Section moves to amend H.F. No as follows: 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Section I...1. Introduction...1 Overview of the Transit System...1. Section II...6. Operator Compliance Requirements...

Federal Subsidies to Passenger Transportation December 2004

SUB-REGIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

2010 MTA Financial Plan & Proposed LIRR Service Reductions Supplemental Information. MTA Long Island Rail Road

AMERICA S LEADING AIRPORT SHUTTLE SERVICE

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

Customer Service Charter

MONTHLY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2017

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

2 YORK REGION TRANSIT VEOLIA AGREEMENT AMENDMENT 91 CALDARI ROAD

Mobile Farebox Repair Program: Setting Standards & Maximizing Regained Revenue

Key Statistical Indicator For The International Airports Operator In PPP/BOT/Project Finance Environment

SARASOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION MINUTES THURSDAY, January 8, 2015

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California

Press Release. Bilfinger 2017: Stable foundation laid for the future

CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards

Service Performance 2017 Networked Family of Services

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER Performance Management Office

Fiscal Management and Control Board. Fare Policy October 16, Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only

THIRD QUARTER AND NINE MONTHS OF 2014 KEY RESULTS

Fixed-Route Operational and Financial Review

Maryland Department of Transportation The Secretary's Office

March 4, Mr. H. Dale Hemmerdinger Chairman Metropolitan Transportation Authority 347 Madison Avenue New York, NY Re: Report 2007-F-31

Board Box. February Item # Item Staff Page 1. Key Performance Indicators M. Thompson Financial Report for Dec H.

3. Aviation Activity Forecasts

Executive Summary. Introduction. Community Assessment

Bristol Virginia Transit

Silver Line Operating Plan

Aircraft Management Comprehensive Ownership, Operation and Maintenance Management Services

Earnings Report 1 st Quarter 2016 Grupo Viva Aerobus

Implementation Guidelines and Performance Measures Special Transportation for Seniors and People with Disabilities (Paratransit) Program

Service Cost Estimate for Route 10 only

Transcription:

PERFORMANCE REPORT-THIRD QUARTER VISION TO DELIVER REGIONAL MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS THAT SIGNIFICANTLY AND CONTINUALLY INCREASE TRANSIT MARKET SHARE. MISSION STATEMENT TO MEET OUR CONSTITUENTS PRESENT AND FUTURE PUBLIC TRANSIT NEEDS BY OFFERING SAFE, CLEAN, RELIABLE, COURTEOUS, ACCESSIBLE, AND COST-EFFECTIVE SERVICE THROUGHOUT THE DISTRICT. GOAL : TO MEET THE PRESENT TRANSPORTATION NEEDS OF THE DISTRICT BY PROVIDING SAFE Objectives: Reduce vehicle accident ratio Increase preventive maintenance Reduce passenger accident ratio Improve light rail safety Improve employee safety. Reduce the number of safety incidents. Vehicle Accident Involvements per 00,000 miles Preventable 0.7 0.9.0.4.05 RTD 0.6 0.7.0 0.9 0.9 First Transit - Commerce City..3.0.85.58 Transdev (fka Veolia) 0.5 0.7.0 0.74 0.93 First Transit Denver.0.3.0.63.38 First Transit Longmont 0.8.0.0 0.9 0.88 Passenger Accident Ratio per 00,000 miles System-wide 0. 0.4 0.8 0. 0. RTD 0. 0.0 0.8 0. 0. First Transit - Commerce City 0.4 0. 0.8 0.0 0.6 Transdev (fka Veolia) 0. 0.4 0.8 0.04 0.08 First Transit Denver 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.08 0.0 First Transit - Longmont 0.04 0.00 0.8 0.8 0.9 3 Operator-Passenger Assault Ratio per 00,000 boardings 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.04 An accident is considered preventable any time the operator was not driving in full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and in such a manner as to avoid involvement despite adverse conditions of road, weather or traffic or the errors of pedestrians or other drivers. Of the total passenger accidents reported by the contractors through Q, 3 were preventable. 3 Of the total 7 passenger accidents reported by the contractors through Q3, 3 were preventable. Performance Measures November 9,

GOAL : TO MEET THE PRESENT TRANSPORTATION NEEDS OF THE DISTRICT BY PROVIDING SAFE PERFORMANCE MEASURES (CONTINUED):. Percentage of Preventive Maintenance inspections incurred as scheduled every 6,000 miles. Percentage of Preventive Maintenance inspections incurred as scheduled every 6,000 miles system wide 99.6% 99.9% 98% 99.9% 99.9% RTD 99.3% 99.8% 98% 99.8% 99.9% First Transit - Commerce City 00% 00% 98% 00.0% 00.0% Transdev (fka Veolia) 99.5% 99.8% 98% 99.5% 99.7% First Transit Denver 00% 99.7% 98% 00.0% 00.0% First Transit Longmont 00% 99.8% 98% 00.0% 00.0% Inspections are scheduled 600 miles prior to 6,000 miles or 600 miles after 6,000 miles..3 Improve response time to emergency dispatch calls. Average Response Time 8 sec. 9 sec. 0 sec. 9 sec. 9 sec..4 Reduce the number of light rail accidents. (Department: Rail Operations) Reportable Light Rail Accidents per 00,000 miles Preventable 0.0.0 0 An accident is considered preventable any time the operator was not driving in full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and in such a manner as to avoid involvement despite adverse conditions of road, weather or traffic or the errors of pedestrians or other drivers. Performance Measures November 9,

GOAL : TO MEET THE PRESENT TRANSPORTATION NEEDS OF THE DISTRICT BY PROVIDING CLEAN Objectives: Prompt graffiti removal Prompt bus interior and exterior cleaning Prompt shelter cleaning. Prompt response to facility complaints. (Department: Safety, Security, and Facilities) Average Response Time Public Complaints <4 hours 4 hours 4 hours < 4 hours < 4 hours Average Graffiti Complaints per Month.0..5..3 Average Facilities Maintenance Complaints per Month.0 4.4 0.0.0 0.7 Elevator 3.3 4.3 5.0.7 Snow/ice.7 5.7 0.3 0 Shelter 0.3 3.0.0 Other 5 7.0 4.0 4.0 Mostly lighting issues.. Prompt response to vehicle complaints. Average Overdue Bus Interior Cleaning per Month 0.0 0.0.0 0.0 0.0 RTD 0. 0..0 0. 0. First Transit - Commerce City 0.0 0.0.0 0.0 0.0 Transdev (fka Veolia) 0.0 0.0.0 0.0 0.0 First Transit Denver 0.0 0.0.0 0.0 0.0 First Transit Longmont 0.0 0.0.0 0.0 0.0 Performance Measures 3 November 9,

Objectives: GOAL 3: TO MEET THE PRESENT TRANSPORTATION NEEDS OF THE DISTRICT BY PROVIDING RELIABLE Improve on-time performance Improve miles between lost service road calls Decrease number of missed trips 3. Maintain system-wide on time performance. (Departments: Bus Operations, Rail Operations) Local On-Time Service System-wide 85.7% 85.9% 88.0% 86.% 85.7% RTD Local 84.0% 84.4% 88.0% 84.5% 84.3% First Transit - Commerce City 83.7% 83.8% 88.0% 84.% 83.3% Transdev (fka Veolia) 88.3% 88.3% 88.0% 87.9% 87.% First Transit Denver 87.% 88.4% 88.0% 88.% 87.4% First Transit Longmont 87.9% 88.3% 88.0% 89.% 89.% Regional On-Time Service 89.8% 9.9% 94.0% 9.3% 9.3% Light Rail - On-Time Service 94.% 93.9% 90.0% 93.9% 93.% Light Rail - Service Available 99.9% 99.9% 99.0% 99.9% 99.9% On-time is arrival at a location no more than minute early and no more than 5 minutes after the scheduled arrival time. In Local on-time service, overall performance was slightly weaker from Q. Only First Transit-Longmont exceeded goal in Local on-time service in Q3. Regional on-time performance though not meeting goal was stable. Light Rail performance exceeded goals. Staff continues to focus on the worst performing routes and identify resources needed to improve. 3. Adherence to scheduled Revenue Service trip start time. Adherence to scheduled Revenue Service trip start time system wide 00% 00% 99.0% 00% 00% RTD 00% 00% 99.0% 00% 00% First Transit - Commerce City 00% 00% 99.0% 00% 00% Transdev (fka Veolia) 00% 00% 99.0% 00% 00% First Transit Denver 00% 00% 99.0% 00% 00% First Transit Longmont 00% 00% 99.0% 00% 00% Performance Measures 4 November 9,

GOAL 3: TO MEET THE PRESENT TRANSPORTATION NEEDS OF THE DISTRICT BY PROVIDING RELIABLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES (CONTINUED): 3.3 Improve miles between road calls. (Departments: Bus Operations) Mileage Between Lost Service Maintenance Road Calls (District),4 3,587 36,38 8,000 53,067 5,38 RTD 30,78 36,767 8,000 64,035 64,338 Transit Bus 7,990 47,393 70,43 59,89 Articulated Bus 9,3 37,45 88,30 64,45 Intercity Bus 5,640 9,689 47,3 74,9 First Transit - Commerce City 37,345 4,69 8,000 48,86 47,85 Transit Bus 37,87 4,647 50,56 48,83 Cutaway Bus 35,93 4,97 N/A 9,888 Transdev (fka Veolia) 30,3 30,95 8,000 3,939 30,8 Transit Bus 4,706 5,79 36,359 40,497 Medium Bus 5,09 45,556 4,953 9,975 First Transit Denver 37,07 36,5 8,000 40,303 40,784 Transit Bus 39,838 37,33 40,643 4,94 Medium Bus 4,84 9,676 37,535 3,993 First Transit Longmont 6,463 44,908 8,000 84,9 6,346 Transit Bus 68,495 7,85,488 6,360 Medium Bus 6,908 9,44 57,447 36,3 Cutaway Bus 7,599 30,483 N/A N/A Hours Between Lost Service Maintenance Road Calls (Mall),75,45 600,37,30 District-wide mileage between lost service maintenance road calls excludes the Mall Shuttles. Maintenance effectiveness for the Sixteenth Street Mall Shuttle is measured in terms of service hours. 3 Improvement is due to newer bus vehicles in the fleet. 4 Average age of the fleet follows: Quantity Average Age Fleet Average Number of Buses and Average Age 5,033 7.9 RTD - Boulder 4 5.6 RTD Platte (including Mall Shuttle) 85 6.09 RTD East Metro 99 3.97 First Transit - Commerce City 6 7.03 First Transit - Denver 3 8.5 First Transit Longmont 79 0.96 Transdev (fka Veolia) 09 7.5 Mall Shuttles 36 4.5 5 The Board of Directors does not adopt goals for these; informational only. Performance Measures 5 November 9,

GOAL 4: TO MEET THE PRESENT TRANSPORTATION NEEDS OF THE DISTRICT BY PROVIDING COURTEOUS Objectives: Reduce customer response time Limit customer complaints Decrease average wait time for telephone information Complete installation of shelter boards by date of service change 4. Reduce average customer response time. (Department: Communications) Average Customer Care Speed of Answer (in seconds) 3 5 65 35 34 In, the measure is changed from Average TIC Call Wait Time to Average Speed of Answer. 4. Improve level of customer complaints. (Departments: Bus Operations, Communications) Avg. Response Time to Customer Complaints Average Cycle Time business 7.5 days 0 days 6.9 days 7.4 days 0.68 days RTD Transportation (Bus and Rail) 7.90 6.3 5.73 RTD All Other Departments 8.79 8.74.08 First Transit Commerce City 9. 4.4 5.65 First Transit - Denver 8.0 6.68 6.97 First Transit - Longmont 7.73 8.45 8.35 Transdev (fka Veolia) 6.6 6.89 6.9 Complaints per Boardings (District) 3.0004.0004.0004.0004.0004 RTD.0003.0003.0004.0003.0003 Local.0003.0003.0004.0004 Express.0003.0003.0000.0000 First Transit - Commerce City.0004.0006.0004.0005.0006 Local.0004.0006.0006.0006 Express.0005.0006.0000.0000 Transdev (fka Veolia).0005.0006.0004.0007.0007 Local.0005.0006.0007.0007 Express.0004.0006.0000.0000 First Transit Denver.0005.0006.0004.0005.0005 Local.0005.0006.0005.0005 Express.0004.0005 N/A N/A First Transit Longmont.0003.0003.0004.0003.0003 Local.0003.0003.0003.0003 The measure reports on resolution of customer complaints across all subject matter throughout the District and the number includes all departments utilizing TrapezeCOM system for commendation and complaint research. 3 Overall system complaints met goal in Q3, but individually, three carriers did not. TransDev and First Transit-Denver were stable in level of customer complaints compared to Q while First Transit-Commerce City slightly declined. All Performance Measures 6 November 9,

three carriers had a high number of complaints related to missed service or late service (no show, bus late, discourtesy, passed up passengers at stop). We also noted a decrease in ridership for all carriers (including RTD) compared to each quarter in. Transdev especially showed a large increase in no show complaints, most likely due to the number of routes that were dropped or returned to RTD due to lack of operator availability. GOAL 4: TO MEET THE PRESENT TRANSPORTATION NEEDS OF THE DISTRICT BY PROVIDING COURTEOUS PERFORMANCE MEASURES (CONTINUED): 4.3 Complete installation of shelter boards by date of service change. (Department: Customer Service) All Shelter Boards installed prior to recent service change of AUGUST. GOAL 5: TO MEET THE PRESENT TRANSPORTATION NEEDS OF THE DISTRICT BY PROVIDING ACCESSIBLE TRANSPORTATION SUPPORT SERVICE. Objectives: Improve on-time performance standards Improve ADA trip availability Improve ADA courtesy 5. Improve ADA on-time performance. Access-a-Ride On-time Service 94.9% 95.% 96.0% 95.7% 95.3% Staffing challenges are causing fluctuations in on-time performance. 5. Improve ADA trip availability. Adherence to ADA mandate to have zero denials to service request 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% 5.3 Improve ADA courtesy. Average ADA complaints per boarding 0.000 0.00 0.00.00.00 Performance Measures 7 November 9,

Objectives: GOAL 6: TO MEET THE PRESENT TRANSPORTATION NEEDS OF THE DISTRICT BY PROVIDING COST- EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT Maintain cost recovery ratios Increase ridership Increase farebox and EcoPass revenue Improve route efficiency Monitor selected internal functions for efficiency Maintain cost effective and efficient transportation services Hire and train competent personnel 6. Maintain all required recovery ratios. (Department: Finance) Operating Cost Recovery Ratio 33.% 7.6% 0% 5.8% 8.0% SB54 Cost Recovery Ratio Yes Yes Yes Ratio is defined as farebox revenues (excluding ADA), advertising revenues, and other operating revenues divided by operating and administrative costs, depreciation on bus operations assets, excluding ADA costs, rapid transit planning costs, and interest payments on rapid transit assets. Ratio is defined as farebox revenues (excluding ADA), advertising revenues, federal operating grants, federal formula bus grants, other operating revenues, and investment income divided by operating and administrative costs, depreciation on bus operations assets, excluding ADA costs, rapid transit planning costs, and interest payments on rapid transit assets. The required ratio is 30% and the calculation will be provided with the Financial Status Reports at the end of each calendar quarter only. here is whether ratio is met by yes/no indication. 6. Increase ridership. (Department: Finance) Overall Ridership Increase 3.% (.9%).5% 3 (3.%) 4 (.6%) 4 3 Established with the Amended Budget. 4 We will monitor and collect more data through. 6.3 Increase in fare revenue and total operating revenue. (Departments: Finance, Communications) 6 6 Fare Revenue.3% 0% 8.0% 5 4.6% 9.5% Total Operating Revenue.5% 0.7% 7.% 5 5.% 9.3% 5 Established with the Amended Budget. 6 We will monitor and collect more data through. 6.4 Monitor selected internal functions for efficiency. (Department: Communications) Audits 0 9 4 Performance Measures 8 November 9,

GOAL 6: TO MEET THE PRESENT TRANSPORTATION NEEDS OF THE DISTRICT BY PROVIDING COST- EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES (CONTINUED): 6.5 Maintain bus operator/mechanic headcount within authorization. Bus Operator Vacancies.4% 5.9% 5.0%.8%.9% Bus Operator Over Headcount 0.0% 0.0% 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% Bus Mechanic Vacancies 9.5% 0.9% 7.5% 3.3%.4% Bus Mechanic Over Headcount 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Authorized headcount represents the level of personnel required to meet service demands in the current runboard. Human Resources has been authorized to exceed authorized headcount to compensate for operator attrition. 6.6 Maintain stock-out level. (Department: Administration) Stock-Out Level 3 0.95%.%.5%.%.3% 3 Calculated as number of stock-out occurrences divided by number of requests. Performance Measures 9 November 9,

GOAL 7: TO MEET THE FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS OF THE DISTRICT. 7. Deliver civic and neighborhood presentations to communicate with the public regarding service issues. (Departments: Communications, Executive Office, Bus Operations, Planning) Communications 96 373 0 34 General Manager 30 09 53 85 Service Change 7 5 Route and Service Planning 97 07 87 7 Local Government Planning Workshops 4 4 3 3 Community Advisory Committee Meetings 7 4 5 7 Info Rides 0 45 6 30 The Board of Directors does not adopt goals for these performance measures; for reporting purposes only. 7. Accurate Financial Analysis (Department: Finance) Distinguished Budget Presentation Award Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Receive Distinguished Budget Presentation Award from the Government Finance Officers Association by year-end. Receive Certificate of Achievement for Excellence In Financial Reporting from the Government Finance Officers Association by year-end. Received Distinguished Budget Presentation Award from the Government Finance Officers Association in third quarter. N/A Performance Measures 0 November 9,