INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

Similar documents
ORDINANCE NO. _2013-

AIRPORT ZONING REGULATIONS for the City of McPherson, Kansas

-NOTE: NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION PURPOSES-

The following criteria shall be applied within the boundaries of the AO District:

PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING. March 20, 2019 AGENDA. 1. Review Minutes. 1

Flying Cloud Airport (FCM) Zoning Process: Informing a Mn/DOT Path Forward

CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Article 11 Airport District

APPENDIX D FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATIONS, PART 77

Chapter Six ALP Drawings. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update

DRAFT MASTER PLAN UPDATE

SITE ELEVATION AMSL...Ground Elevation in feet AMSL STRUCTURE HEIGHT...Height Above Ground Level OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL...Total Overall Height AMSL

ARTICLE 34 AIRPORT HEIGHT COMBINING ZONE (AH) (Amended by Ordinance #295 Effective June 26, 2009)

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS

Chapter 9 - AIRPORT SYSTEM DESIGN

Boise Municipal Code. Chapter DEFINITIONS

Source: Chippewa Valley Regional Airport ASOS, Period of Record

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport

Document prepared by MnDOT Office of Aeronautics and HNTB Corporation. MINNESOTA GO STATE AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN


CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

Agenda: SASP SAC Meeting 3

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AERONAUTICS DIVISION CHAPTER LICENSING AND REGISTRATION OF AIRPORTS TABLE OF CONTENTS

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW

BELFAST MUNICIPAL AIRPORT OVERVIEW

DRAFT GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND SPECIFIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN MIDDLETON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT MOREY FIELD. Revised 12/12/03

1.0 Project Background Mission Statement and Goals Objectives of this Sustainable Master Plan

Chapter Seven COST ESTIMATES AND FUNDING A. GENERAL

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Santa Barbara Airport Master Plan. MEETING DATE: November 19, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 7D

ERIE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reliever Airports: NOISE ABATEMENT PLAN Flying Cloud Airport (FCM)

STUDY WORK GROUP MEETING No. 3. November 29, 2016

CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED ACTION

Airport Master Plan. Brookings Regional Airport. Runway Runway 17-35

Introduction DRAFT March 9, 2017

STUDY OVERVIEW MASTER PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Kittitas County Airport Bowers Field Airport Master Plan Planning Advisory Committee Meeting #1 April 6, 2016

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

Planning Challenges and Solutions

Safety, Infrastructure, and Tenant Improvement Project. Public Hearing Informational Brochure February 26, 2013

Chapter 8.0 Implementation Plan

Grants Pass Airport Master Plan & Airport Layout Plan Update

Chapter AIRPORT ZONING

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

Lake Tahoe Airport Master Plan Public Meeting March 16, 2015

AIRSPACE PROTECTION. Guidance and considerations for development in the vicinity of Ohio s airports and heliports

AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE

MASTER PLAN CONCEPT 1 DRAFT

Addendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6)

Chapter One INVENTORY

Chapter 2 FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS

FORECASTING FUTURE ACTIVITY

ACTION TRANSMITTAL

SUBCHAPTER E AIRSPACE

Table of Contents. Overview Objectives Key Issues Process...1-3

Preferred Alternative Summary

chapter 5 Recommended Master Plan Concept airport master plan MASTER PLAN CONCEPT

Lake Tahoe Airport Master Plan

DRAFT FINAL REPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN. Rifle Garfield County Airport Revised May 15, 2014

Aviation Planning in Maine and Our Region. Stacie Haskell Aviation Coordinator & Study Manager Maine Department of Transportation April 27, 2011

Appendix D Project Newsletters. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update

Contents. Page 1 of 11 / Draft Chapter 142 Version CHAPTER AIRPORT ZONING... 2 ARTICLE I. - IN GENERAL... 2

Buchanan Field. Airport Planning Program. FAR Part 150 Meeting. September 28, Master Plan FAR Part 150 Noise Study Strategic Business Plan

Dallas Executive Airport Town Hall Meeting April 3, 2014

Westover Metropolitan Airport Master Plan Update

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Old Town Village Mixed Use Project City of Goleta. MEETING DATE: June 18, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 5M

at: Accessed May 4, 2011.

Overview ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices for Aerodrome Safeguarding

Why are the underground fuel tanks being removed and replaced with above ground tanks?

Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) Update. Public Information Meeting #4 June 8 & 9, 2016

AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATILIBILTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATIBILIITY

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Washington Aviation System Plan Update July 2017 i

St. Paul Downtown Airport (STP)

TABLE OF CONTENTS. General Study Objectives Public Involvement Issues to Be Resolved

JOSLIN FIELD, MAGIC VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT DECEMBER 2012

Table of Contents. Master Plan March 2014 TOC i Spokane International Airport

Lopez Island Airport Master Plan Update. Public Meeting June 15, 2017

Consideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.

CHAPTER 61 SHEBOYGAN COUNTY MEMORIAL AIRPORT

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Consistency Determination Betteravia Plaza. MEETING DATE: January 21, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 8D

1.1.3 Taxiways. Figure 1-15: Taxiway Data. DRAFT Inventory TYPICAL PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION LIGHTING TYPE LENGTH (FEET) WIDTH (FEET) LIGHTING CONDITION

PULLMAN-MOSCOW REGIONAL AIRPORT Runway Realignment Project

CHAPTER 5: Landside Facility Requirements and Development Concepts

Chapter The All-new, World-class Denver International Airport Identify Describe Know Describe Describe

Milton. PeterPrinceAirportislocatedinSantaRosaCounty, approximatelythreemileseastofmilton.

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

Current Airport Roles

Airport Obstruction Standards

Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016

AIRSIDE CAPACITY AND FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

TECHNICAL REPORT #7 Palm Beach International Airport Airport Layout Plan

AIR NAVIGATION ORDER

2015 PURDUE ROAD SCHOOL March 11, 2015

FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT

Chapter 1 Introduction and Project Overview

Merritt Island Airport

FBO Request for Proposal Lake Cumberland Regional Airport

SouthwestFloridaInternational Airport

AERONAUTICAL SURVEYS & INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

Transcription:

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: CITY COUNCIL, AIRPORT COMMITTEE, AND PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE FROM: MELISSA ROMÁN SUBJECT: 2017 AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DATE: APRIL 18, 2017 As part of the 2017 Master Plan Update process, we will create an Executive Summary to be incorporated into the City of Newport Comprehensive Plan. There are many processes to integrating the Master Plan into the Comprehensive Plan. The first is to ask the PAC, Airport Committee and City Council to review the DRAFT Executive Summary. This is not a finished document. We will tighten the language and add additional detail as we complete the master planning process. Nonetheless, there is enough here for everyone to review our direction and address any portion of the executive summary they feel needs attention. Please review the attached document. We will add it to the intricate and comprehensive list of topics to discuss in tomorrow s meetings.

AIRPORT FACILITIES The Newport Municipal Airport is on the southern end of the City of Newport and approximately three miles from the city center. Access to the Airport is provided by Highway 101, which is an essential Coastal link running through California, Oregon, and Washington. Highway 101 connects to other coastal cities, such as Florence to the south and Tillamook to the north. More detailed information on the historical and background environmental setting of the Newport Municipal Airport can be found in the document entitled, Newport Municipal Airport: Airport Master Plan Update (hereinafter, the Airport Master Plan ). Existing Municipal Airport Facilities: The Airport is at an elevation of 161.1 feet MSL and consists of approximately 700 acres. Existing facilities are described here within three primary categories: airfield, landside, and support facilities. Airfield facilities include areas such as runways, taxiways, and aprons. Landside facilities include areas such as hangars, buildings, and auto parking. Support facilities include emergency services, utilities, and miscellaneous facilities that do not logically fall into either airfield or landside facilities. Components of the airport facility are outlined in Table on page ### and illustrated on Exhibit 2B from Chapter 2 of the Airport Master Plan. A brief discussion of the major components of the airport follows. Approach/Airspace: Both ends of Runway 16-34 have a four-light Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI). The PAPI at Runway 34 is out of service until vegetation blocking the extended approach path is removed. A PAPI provides glideslope information to pilots on final approach by displaying sequences of different colored lights to maintain a safe glide path for landing. Included in the Runway 16 precision Instrument Landing System (ILS), is a Medium Intensity Approach Lighting System with Runway Alignment Indicator Lights (MALSR), a localizer, and a glide slope, with visibility minimums for the approach procedure as low as ¾ statute mile. Other NAVAIDS. There is a segmented circle and lighted windsock located mid-field as well as a smaller, supplementary, wind sock located near Runway 34. A rotating beacon is on the west side of Runway 16, and is in good operating condition. Automated Weather Observing System (AWOS). Although as of 2016 there is an Automated Weather Observing System (AWOS) at the Airport, the AWOS will no longer be in service after 2016 due to problems acquiring parts. Airport Support Facilities Emergency Services. Aircraft rescue and firefighting (ARFF) is available through the City of Newport Fire Department, which is located on the northwest end of the airfield, and is stored in a fire station with direct access to the airfield. The ARFF vehicle is a Rosenbauer Airwolf C2 that was purchased in 2013. Fencing. A full perimeter security fence. Ground transportation to and from the Airport includes local transit service (on-call), taxi, and

rental car service. Utilities and Public Services: Water to some areas, Sanitary Sewer by individual septic systems, Telephone - Local franchise companies, Electricity Highway Signage. Guidance signs to the Airport Highway 101 maintained by the Oregon Department of Transportation. Airport Users: Twenty-eight aircraft were based at the Newport Municipal Airport in 2016. Twenty-three (23) are single engine piston; four are multi-engine piston; one is a single engine turbine. No commercial air carriers use the airport. The U.S. Coast Guard operates on airport property from a permanent facility with a temporary crew from which they rotate two helicopters. Structures: Runway 16-34 was reconstructed in 2014 and is in excellent condition; Runway 2-20 is composed of asphalt in good condition. There are five taxiways (A, B, C, D, E). Since the purchase of the fixed base operations and building structure by the City of Newport in 2007, the City has run the FBO at the Airport. The FBO is staffed seven days a week from 8:00 A.M to 5:00 P.M. Presently. The FBO building has two offices on the main floor and a pilot lounge with refrigerator and counter space. There are three offices on the second floor, a larger conference space area, and a bar with a small kitchen. As of 2016 current, one of the FBO s office areas is leased. The Airport has a separate 2,400-square-foot office building that is currently leased to FedEx. Table## Existing Airport Facilities Facility Characteristics Condition Runway 16-34 5,398 ft. x 100 ft.; VORTAC, PAPIs, ILS, Excellent REILS approach aids; HIRL; Precision marking Runway 2-20 3,300 ft. x 75 ft.; VORTAC visual aid; Good MIRL lighting; nonprecision marking Taxiway A 2,850 ft. x 35 ft. Provides access to Runway Good 16, Taxiway B, Taxiway C, and Taxiway D. Taxiway B Provides access to Runway 16 and Excellent Taxiway A. Taxiway C Provides access to Runway 16, 20 and Good to Excellent Taxiway A. Taxiway 0 Provides access from the tie down Fair to Good area, FBO, Taxiway A. Taxiway E Provides access to Runway 2, Runway 34, Good T-hangars, US Coast Guard building, Box hangar, overflow tie down area, Jet Parking, Cargo area, Main Apron, and FBO.

Aircraft Parking Aprons: Terminal Total aircraft apron area at the Airport is Good estimated at 18,392 square yards, or an estimated 3.8 acres. Eleven (11) tie-downs; Access to Self-Serve Tank. Overflow Eight (8) tie-down spots Good Transport / Jet 7,000 square yards, for Lear Jet or Good One (1) parked Gulfstream G-IV jet or C-130 Cargo 1 Tie-down area Excellent Military helipad Generated by U.S. Coast Guard Very good Hangars 20 box hangars; Fair to Good 3 executive hangars 10 T-hangars Terminal Approx. 1820 SF with adjacent 4,480 SF hangar. Very Good Building Temporary; 1,681 square ft. Poor Public Parking Twenty-Three (23) total: sixteen (16) adjacent Good to FBO, seven (7) adjacent to building leased to Fed Ex, 3 Handicap Spaces combined Coast Guard One (1) permanent buildings Unknown Fuel Storage Two (2) above-ground tanks: Jet A tank with a Unknown 12,000 gallon capacity; 100 LL tank with a 10,000 gallon capacity. One (1) 2000 gallon above ground self-serve fuel tank. Source: Newport Municipal Airport: Airport Master Plan Update, Newport. Oregon, 2017 WR Pacific Recommended Airport Improvement Projects: Chapters 3 and 4 of the Municipal Airport Master Plan forecast airport demand and identify airport facility requirements. The population base for the analyses includes the Lincoln County area, which is forecasted to reach52,175 by the year 2035. From the demand forecasts, airport facility requirements were identified. A municipal airport layout plan, terminal area plan, and airspace, approach, and clear zone plans addressing the facility requirements are established in Chapter 8 of the Airport Master Plan.

Chapter three of the Municipal Airport Master Plan forecasts a transition in air fleet from prop planes to small business jets. The fleet mix of aircraft based at the Airport will likely change over the forecast period, although single engine, piston-powered aircraft will still be predominant. The forecast includes a slight increase in the number of turboprop and turbojet aircraft, and helicopters in the future, which reflects the national trends and would be expected from the effects of in-migration likely to occur in the Newport area. The forecast is based on an extrapolated use trend analysis, correlation analysis of socioeconomic and other aviation activity indicators, market analysis, FAA requirements and forecasts, and professional judgment. Approach/Airspace: The Approach and Clear Zone Plan, Drawing 3 of 3, illustrates the approach and departure safety concerns relating to adjacent airport development. Acquisition of adjacent property at the north and south ends of Runway 16-34 and the northeast end of Runway 2-20 is recommended to provide additional clear zone. Airport Users: The Newport Municipal Airport is proposed to be a general utility small business jet airport in accordance with the FAA s Airplane Design Group (ADG) 111. It is expected that most of the airport s general aviation use will involve airplanes with Wingspans less than 49 feet. The commuter fleet would include airplanes with wingspans between 49 and 117 feet. These would probably include 18- to 36-seat commercial airline aircraft. The Newport Municipal Airport is currently unused by commercial passenger air carriers. The current demand for regional commercial commuter air carrier services, which is unmet by airline services to the airport, is approximately 3,000 enplaned passengers per year (based on peak use for 2010). Many of the potential enplaned passengers could probably be captured by initiation of commuter air carrier service at the airport. General aviation demand by the year 2035 is forecasted to include approximately 42 based aircraft. These general aviation aircraft are expected to generate approximately 25,550 aircraft operations per year by the year 2035. Therefore, the total number of operations, including Air Taxi and Military, from the Newport Municipal Airport by the year 2035 is expected to reach 31,350. Structures: Several facility improvements are recommended to accommodate this airport use demand. Table 8 (page 163) outlines the recommended staged development for the Newport Municipal Airport. The recommended facility improvements are illustrated in the Airport Layout Plan and the Terminal Area Plan, Drawings 1 of 3 and 2 of 3, respectively. These recommended improvements are briefly discussed in the following. The first planning period through 2021, or Stage I of the airport development program, will include lining the 48-inch concrete storm pipe running under the runway intersection from east to west and preliminary/environmental work for separating the runways. The second 5-year planning period, or Stage II separating the runways. of the airport development program, will involve The third S-year planning period, or Stage Ill of the airport development program, will include

improvements to accommodate changing requirements as the airport develops into a C-I small jet traffic airport. This activity will include improving the principal runway and key taxiways. Additional hangars are recommended to meet facility requirements. Although the FAA does not currently fund hangar construction, construction of new hangars could potentially increase airport revenue. Funding: Table 8 (page L2###) identifies potential funding sources for each of the proposed airport improvement projects. The costs indicated for all development items are expressed in 2016 dollars. Chapter 9 of the Airport Master Plan provides a detailed discussion of potential funding sources that are summarized here. Table 8 Recommended Airport Development Priority A. Stage I (2017-2021) 2017 Local FAA State Other Total 2017 Storm Pipe Rehab $23,000 $150,000 $30,000 $203,000 Total 2017 $23,000 $150,000 $30,000 $203,000 2018 2018 Carry Over Total 2018 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2019 2019 Storm Pipe Rehab Construction $100,000 2019 PMP $2,250,000 $20,000 $150,000 $2,500,000 $20,000 Total 2019 $100,000 $2,270,000 $150,000 $2,520,000 2020 2020 Non-Standard Geometry Improvements Pre-Design & Environ Assess $3,800 $342,000 $34,200 $380,000 Total 2020 $3,800 $342,000 $34,200 $380,000 2021 2021 Carry Over Total 2021 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Stage I $126,800 $3,104,000 $214,200 $0 $3,103,000

Runway Reconstruction Construct Phase Priority tgçl[(22226)_ Local FAA State Other Tot 2022 Non-Standard Geometry Improvements Design $39,450 $355,550 $395,000 2022 PMP $20,000 $20,000 2023 Non-Standard Geometry Improvements Construction $474,000 $4,266,000 $4,740,000 2024 Apron Expansion Environmental $16,666 $150,000 $166,666 2025 PMP $20,000 $20,000 2025 Apron Expansion Design $12,000 $108,000 $120,000 2026 Apron Expansion Construction $115,000 $1,035,000 $1,150,000 Total Stage II $657,116 $5,954,550 $0 $0 $6,611,666 Priority C. Stage 111(2227-2237) Local FAA State Other Total 2028 PMP $20,000 $20,000 2029 Design/Construct Apron Expansion - 2 $89,000 $801,000 $890,000 TBD Design and Construct New Aircraft Cargo Building/Facility $480,000 $480,000 TBD Design/Construction Taxiway A Reconstruction $134,000 $1,206,000 $1,340,000 TBD Airport Master Plan $55,000 $495,000 $550,000 TBD Environmental Assessment Runway 16-34 - RDC to C-I $50,000 $300,000 $350,000 TBD Environmental, Pre-Design & Design Runway 34 RSA, Reconstruction, and Extension (Phases I, II, and III) $160,000 $1,450,000 $1,610,000 TBD Phase I - 34 RSA Construction $1,820,000 $16,230,000 $1,820,000 Total Stage Ill $2,308,000 $20,652,000 $0 $480,000 $23,440,000 Priority D. Stage IV (Beyond 2036) Local FAA State Other Total TBD Phase II - of TBD TBD TBD Runway 34 End $514,000 $4,626,000 $ $ $5,140,000 Phase III - New Entry Taxiway E $62,000 $558,000 $ $ $620,000 Environmental, Pre-Design & Design Runway 16 RSA, Reconstruction, & Relocation (Phases I, II, and III) $138,000 $1,242,000 $ $ $1,380,000 Site Prep and Access Road Improvements for Northwest Development Area $31,000 $279,000 $ $ $310,000

TBD TBD TBD Phase I - Runway 16 RSA Construction $1,360,000 Phase II - Reconstruction! Relocation of Runway 16 End $597,000 Phase Ill - Construct New Entry Taxiway Al $150,000 $12,240,000 $ $5,373,000 $ $720,000 $ $ $13,600,000 $ $5,970,000 $ $800,000 Total Stage IV $2,782,000 TOTAL ALL STAGES $6,088,116 $25,038,000 $0 $54,406,550 $480,000 $ $27,820,000 $0 $60,974,666 Costs based on 2016 dollars with 25% overhead. Source: Newport Municipal Airport: Airport Master Plan Update, Newport. Oregon, 2017 WH Pacific

GOALS AND POLICIES PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT AIRPORT Goal 1: Strive to provide for the aviation needs of the City of Newport and Lincoln County. Policy 1: City will ensure through zoning and subdivision ordinance provisions that the airport will be able to operate safely and efficiently. Implementation Measure 1.1.1: Periodically review municipal codes and zoning codes to see that they are in line with the needs of the airport. Policy 2: City will cooperate with state and federal agencies in the development of the airport. Implementation Measure 1.2.1: Staff will attend aviation conferences, participate in collaborative meetings, stay abreast of personnel changes, and network with our aviation engineering consultant to ensure quality relationships with key players in industry, state and federal agencies. Goal 2: Endeavor to be recognized by the Oregon Department of Aviation (ODA) as the coastal lifeline in emergency/disaster situations. Policy 1: City of Newport will assess the seismic stability of the Newport Municipal Airport for readiness to support the region during and after a Cascadia Event. Implementation Measure 2.1.1: City of Newport shall conduct a seismic stability study of the airport including the financial requirements required to upgrade or stabilize any weaknesses discovered during the seismic study. Implementation Measure 2.1.2: City of Newport will work with regional and national bodies to develop a plan to finance and implement any recommended improvements coming out of the seismic study. Policy 2: The City of Newport will continue to investigate recommendations listed in Section F of the Report from the City of Newport Regional Airport Review Task Force (17 February 2016, Roumagoux, et al): In the event of a natural disaster, the airport could play a critical role in meeting the emergency needs of individuals on the central coast. Implementation Measure 2.2.1: City will work with the Coast Guard to evaluate the USCG airport facility to determine its stability in the event of a major Cascadia event. Implementation Measure 2.2.2: City will contact FEMA to see what would be needed to

establish an emergency supply depot facility at the airport. Implementation Measure 2.2.3: City will work with the Oregon Department of Aviation, FEMA, the FAA and other governing agencies to be recognized an emergency response facility. Goal 3: Achieve financial sustainability. Policy 1: Develop a finance strategy for airport improvements Implementation Measure 3.1.1: City of Newport will continue to investigate co-partnering with other government bodies to manage the airport. Policy 2: The City of Newport will continue to investigate recommendations listed in Section C of the Report of the Regional Airport Review Task Force: The City of Newport provides a subsidy to the airport for its operation...it is important for the city to review increasing revenue opportunities as well as reducing expenditures. Implementation Measure 3.2.1: City will assess economical and practical ways of building access to the east side and back area of the airport to allow for commercial development of those properties. Implementation Measure 3.2.2: City will look for ways to utilize leasing land on the east side of the airport designated for non-aviation Development. Implementation Measure 3.2.3: City will explore ways to facilitate non-aviation development on the west side of the airport in areas designated appropriate for such development. Goal 4: Strive for a clear understanding of aviation impacts on land use adjacent to the Airport, such as noise, surface transportation, height restrictions, and others. Policy 1: The Airport will work with neighboring property owners to maintain a safe aviation boundary around the airport. Implementation Measure 4.1.1: Consider impact on surrounding private properties when developing airport alternatives. Implementation Measure 4.1.2: Develop airport facilities and alternatives with adherence to environmental regulations. Implementation Measure 4.1.3: Balance the needs of airport infrastructure with protection of the environment. Implementation Measure 4.1.4: Assess all Imaginary Surfaces used for avigation easement to choose appropriate surface for easements; update easements whenever there is a navigation change on the airport adjusting an Imaginary Surface. Address easement needs based on controlling Imaginary Surface. Policy 2: The City of Newport will continue to investigate recommendations listed in Section E of the

Report of the Regional Airport Review Task Force: The airport, city, and its partners need to explore opportunities to enter into economic development ventures or partnerships that encourage the development potential in and around the airport and act as a catalyst to ensure the airport is positioned for future economic or business development. Implementation Measure 4.2.1: City will explore potential economic development incentives for businesses desiring to locate at the airport. Implementation Measure 4.2.2: City will continue obtaining buildable fill materials as Available and testing placed material for structural stability. Goal 5: Secure Commercial service when economically feasible. Policy 1: Look for independent commuter service opportunities in the changing commercial air service industry moving away from hub connections to rural airports. Implementation Measure 5.1.1: Work with Oregon Department of Aviation (ODA) to generate ideas, and capture opportunities, as the State ODA continues exploring strategies for commuter service to rural airports throughout Oregon. Policy 2: Maintain airfield to safety standards required for commuter service. Implementation Measure 5.2.1: Complete further study to determine if the 139 Certification is necessary to the Airports success in drawing a commercial airline. Implementation Measure 5.2.2: Retain ARFF facilities & equipment for airport and community safety. Policy 3: The City of Newport will continue to investigate recommendations listed in Section A of the Report of the Regional Airport Review Task Force: providing commercial passenger air service into Newport would clearly be a significant tool to continue support of the marine research community, commercial fishing, and tourism economies in Lincoln County. Implementation Measure 5.3.1: Craft a marketing strategy (three or four key elements; have it reviewed by regional experts from a variety of sectors (business, recreation, personal travelers). Implementation Measure 5.3.2: Local steering committee will be established to work with consultant selected to perform the feasibility study to assure that the findings are representative of the local community. The results of the study should be summarized and included in a package that could be used with any potential carriers. Implementation Measure 5.3.3: Craft a strategy to entice air service providers that answers key questions: What is the return on investment? What risks are there and what is being done to mitigate them? What support can we expect from the city and the community? Goal 6: Maximize or fully leverage airport footprint for aviation use. Policy 1: Airport facilities will be upgraded as warranted to maintain a safe and useful airfield.

Implementation Measure 6.1.1: Assess airport facilities including apron redesign and correction of non-standard geometry for future role of airport. Policy 2: Future development shall comply with FAA regulations, maintain existing airfield capability and increase resiliency. Implementation Measure 6.2.1: Capital Improvement Projects will upgrade areas of the airfield designed to outdated airport standards to meet current FAA design standards. Goal 7: Foster community awareness. Policy 1: Develop an Airport outreach program to demonstrate the advantages available to the community through airport services. Implementation Measure 7.1.1: Create an Airport Outreach Program adaptable to all ages to educate families as well as business on the benefits of a local airport. Policy 2: The City of Newport will continue to investigate recommendations listed in Section D of the Report of the Regional Airport Review Task Force: It is important the City utilize any available resources including websites, social media, and other forums to share with the community what services are available at the airport. Implementation Measure 7.2.1: City will create a marketing strategy to promote the use of land and facilities by the appropriate developers utilizing the airport to enhance economic development in Lincoln County. Implementation Measure 7.2.2: City will review the user friendly services available at the airport and where those services are not in existence, explore implementing new services that fill this vacancy. Implementation Measure 7.2.3: City will explore the possibility of contracting with a person/firm, or assigning this task to the Destination Newport Committee, to develop professional marketing information regarding the Newport Municipal Airport. Goal 8: Expand and install utility infrastructure at the airport for aviation and non-aviation development. Policy 1: City of Newport Buildings and Property used for Municipal and Commercial Development should be served by working utility infrastructure sufficient to meet operating needs and future growth. Implementation Measure 8.1.1: Install sanitary sewer to the airport and complete the water distribution system. Implementation Measure 8.1.2: Investigate property purchase or ground easements for sewage system expansion from wastewater treatment plant to the airport. Implementation Measure 8.1.3: Expand City of Newport water system from existing pipe feeding

water to the ARFF Station to other areas of the airport. Policy 2: Seek strategic partnerships to leverage public/private funds other than City resources to expand infrastructure to serve new uses. Implementation Measure 8.2.1: Research potential grant opportunities supporting infrastructure development. Implementation Measure 8.2.2: City will develop private/public relationship solutions to expand infrastructure to and on airport property. Policy 3: City will investigate potential timelines and practices necessary to install sewer and water to the airport. Implementation Measure 8.2.1: City will develop and implementation plan to tie residential and commercial sewer to the south end of Newport and the airport. Implementation Measure 8.2.2: City will act on implementation plan to forward sewer and water expansion on the airport. Goal 9: Develop and maintain a clear distinction between aviation and non-aviation development requirements and the role of the FAA in the development review process in both areas. Policy 1: Coordinate with FAA to develop separate procedures for review of aviation related and non-aviation related development with an eye towards creating a predictable set of requirements and streamline review timelines particularly for non-aviation related development. Implementation Measure 9.1.1: Review current version of 5190_6b FAA Airport Compliance Manual to outline a protocol for addressing the FAA with Aviation and Non-aviation development opportunities. Implementation Measure 9.1.2: Create a procedure policy that addresses requirements stated in 5190_6b FAA Airport Compliance Manual combined with needs of local developers to present to the FAA for review. Implementation Measure 9.1.3: Incorporate agreed upon review procedures into City codes. Goal 10: Establish and maintain avigation easements to ensure all pertinent FAA imaginary surfaces are free of obstacles and supported by appropriate documentation allowing the City to maintain applicable Imaginary Surfaces. Policy 1: City of Newport will update current aviation easements surrounding the airport. Implementation Measure 10.1.1: Update existing avigation easements based on current and presently foreseen navigation needs. Implementation Measure 10.1.2: As new navigation aids are installed at the airport, existing easements will be reviewed to see if any upgrade is needed to maintain new navigation

requirements. Policy 2: City will establish easements where non exist but are needed for proper maintenance of the Airport. Implementation Measure 10.2.1: Conduct a survey of all easement needs adjacent to the airport. Periodically review avigation easements to ensure easements are negotiated concurrent with airport development. Implementation Measure 10.2.2: Negotiate avigation easements where none exist but are required by FAA design standards. Policy 3: City will assess surrounding airport properties that will benefit aviation in the future for potential purchase Implementation Measure 10.3.1: Use the 2017 Airport Master Plan, approved FAA Airport Layout Plan, and Goal 11: Strive to prepare the airfield for adaptation to changes in the national fleet and local needs in the next 15 to 20 years as business jet enplanements increase nationally and locally. Policy 1: Design airfield improvements to a B-Il design craft during the next 10 to 15 years or until a new master plan is conducted or enpianements warrant a change in classification. Implementation Measure 11.1.1: Use B-Il design criteria to a) redesign apron area; b) separate taxiway E from RW 2; c) separate intersecting runways; d) install new taxiway between taxiway A and relocated RW 2 threshold; e) correct non-standard geometry at taxiway A, D and RW 2 threshold. Policy 2: Prepare for future C-i growth. Implementation Measure 11.2.1: Invest in additional airside land purchases to prepare for the changes in runway protection zones and flight patterns required for a C-I airport. Implementation Measure 11.2.2: Base zoning codes, noise contours, and land use policy updates to ensure land around the airport is protected for the future C-I classification.

- Commented CHAPTER 14.22 AIRPORT RESTRICTED AREA 14.22.010 Definitions. As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires: A. Airport means the Newport Municipal Airport. B. Airport Elevation means 161 feet above mean sea levelj.. - Commented [MRS]: Update to Navd-88 Datum. Elevation respect to the North American Datum of 1988 (NAVD-a8). - may be different. C. Airport Reference Point means the point established as the Commented LMR6]: Look at Flight Information Booklet from FM for exact elevation information. Match ALP. approximate geographic center of the airport landing area and so designated. D. Approach Surface means a surface longitudinally centered on the extended runway center line, extending outward and upward from the-each end of the primary surface and at the same slope as the approach zone height limitation slope set forth in the-section 14.22.030. In plan, the perimeter of the approach surface coincides with the perimeter of the approach zone. An approach surface is applied to each end of each runway based upon the type of approach available or planned for that runway end. E. Utility Runway Visual Runway (Runway 2-20) means a runway that is constructed for and intended to be used by propeller-driven aircraft of 12,50033,000 pounds maximum gross weight and less. - ---P Commented tmr7]: Use ODA examples. [MR8]: According to 5010 data, this isn t referred to as a Utility Runway. It s an A(vlfAlVl for FAR 77 F. Conical Surface means a surface extending outward ad upward from the periphery of the horizontal surface at a slope of 40-20 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 4,000 feet. G. Departure Surface means a surface longitudinally centered on the extended runway center line, extending outward and upward from the end of the primary surface and at the same slope as the departure zone height limitation slope of 40:1 for a horizontal distance of 10,000 feet. In plan, the perimeter of the departure surface coincides with the perimeter of the departure zone. FH.Hazard To Air Navigation means an obstruction determined to have a substantial adverse effect on the safe and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace. Commented tmr9j: Departure Surface Not defined by ODA; colloquial term. 0-I. Height. For the purpose of determining the height limits in all zones set forth in this Code and shown on the Zoning Map, the datum shall be mean sea level elevation (with respect to

the North American Datum of 198$ (NAVD-88) unless otherwise specified. 4J. Horizontal Surface means a horizontal plane 150 feet above the established airport elevation, the perimeter of which in plan coincides with the perimeter of the horizontal zone. l-k. Instrument Runway means a runway equipped or to be equipped with electronic or visual air navigation aids adequate to permit the landing of aircraft under restricted visibility conditions. i. Larcr Than utility Runw,v mrn fljnw7 j constructco, TOt Jfl intenoco to oc usco O j propciict OtIVCfl Commented [MR1OJ: Accordingto5Olo data, 34 isn t -,,r.-,fl4- than pounds maximum considered a Larger than Utility Runway. It s a C for FAR W...IbIt JIIuJL crcd aircraft. C. Medium Intensity Approach Lighting System with Runway Alignment Indicator Lights tmalsr) means a!ighting array Commented [MR11J: Do we need to add this section in with approach lights that flash in sequence toward the order to add a section to the height limitations and threshold at the rate of twice per second. All lights are aimed PU55? into the approach to the runway and away from the runway threshold. The MALSR requires land that is 1,600 feet long by 400 feet wide for the MALS portion, plus an additional 1,000 feet in length by 25 feet in width for the runway alignment indicator light (RAIL) portion. M. Non Precision Runway VORTEC/GPS guided (34) Commented [MR12J: Develop K-TN. Obstruction. Any structure, growth, or other object. including a mobile object, that exceeds a limiting height set forth in this section. ho.precision Instrument Runway (Runway 16) means a runway having an instrument approach procedure utilizing an Instrument Landing System (lls) or a Precision Approach Radar (PAR). It also means a runway for which a precision approach system is planned and is so indicated on an approved airport layout plan or any other planning document. M.P. Primary Surface means a surface longitudinally centered on a runway. When the runway has a specifically prepared hard surface, the primary surface extends 200 feet beyond each end of the runway. For military runways, or when the runway has no specially prepared hard surface (or planned hard surface), the primary surface ends at each end of that

runway. The elevation of any point on the primary surface is the same as the elevation of the nearest point on the runway centerline. 0. Runway means a defined area on an airport prepared for landing and takeoff of aircraft along is length. N-0R. Runway Protection Zone means an area off the runway end to enhance the protection of people and property on the ground. O-S.Structure means an object, including a mobile object, constructed or installed, including -but without limitation buildings, towers, cranes, smokestacks, earth formations, and overhead transmission lines. P-J.Transitional Surfaces. These surfaces extend outward to 900 angles to the runway center line, and the runway centerline extends at a slope of seven (7) feet horizontally for each foot vertically from the sides of the primary and approach surfaces to where they intersect the horizontal and conical surfaces. Transitional surfaces for those portions of the precision approach surfaces, which project through and beyond the limits of the conical surface, extend a distance of 5,000 feet measured horizontally from the edge of the approach surface and at 90 angles to the extended runway centerline. OU. Tree means any object of natural growth. R-N.Visual Runway (Runway 2-20) means a runway intended solely for the operation of aircraft using visual approach procedures. 14.22.020 Airport Zones. In order to carry out the provisions of this Code, there are hereby created and established certain zones that include all of the land lying within the Instrument Approach Zones, Non-Instrument Approach Zones, Transition Zones, Horizontal Zones, Departure Zones and Conical Zones. Such areas and zones are shown on the Layout Plan and Approach and Clear Zone Plan of the Newport Municipal Airport, consisting of three sheets prepared by George M. Baldwin & Associates (dated August 24, 1979), which is made part of this Ordinance. An area located in more than one of the following zones is considered to be only in the zone with the more restrictive height limitation. The various zones are hereby established and defined as follows {Commented [MR13I Use

A. Utility Runway Visual Approach Zones (both ends of Runway 2 20). The inner edge of this approach coincides with thc width of the primary surface and is 250 feet wide. The approach zone expands outward uniformly to the width of 1,250 feet at a horizontal distance of 5,000 feet from the primary surface. Its centerline is the continuation of the centerline of the runway. 3 l). The inner edge of this approach zone coincides with the width of the primary surface and is 1,000 feet wide. The approach zone expands outward uniformly to a width of 1,500 feet at a horizontal distance of 5,000 feet from the orimarl surface. Its centerline is the continuation of the runway. A. Precision Instrument Runway Approach Zone (Runway 16: 34). The inner edge of this approach zone coincides with the width of the primary surface and is 1,000 feet wide. The approach zone expands outward uniformly to a width of 16,000 feet at a horizontal distance of 50,000 feet from the primary surface. Its centerline is the continuation of the centerline of the runway. GB.Departure Surface Zone (Runway 16-34). The inner edge of this approach zone coincides with the width of the primary surface and is 1,000 feet wide. The approach zone expands outward uniformly to a width of 6,466 feet at a horizontal distance of 10,200 feet from the primary surface. Its centerline is the continuation of the centerline of the runway. D-,C. Transitional Zones. The transitional zones are the areas beneath the transitional surfaces. D.Horizontal Zones. The horizontal zone is established by swinging arcs of 5,000 feet radii for all runways designated utility or visual and 10,000 feet for all others from the center of each end of the primary surface of each runway and connecting the adjacent arcs by drawing lines tangent to those arcs. The horizontal zone does not include the approach and transitional zones. E. Conical Zone. The conical zone is established as the area that commences at the periphery of the horizontal zone and extends outward there from a horizontal distance of 4,000 feet. [Commented [MR14]: Not called Zones; FAA calls them imaginary surfaces

14.22.030 Airport Zone Height Limitations. Except as otherwise provided in this Code, no structure shall be erected, altered, or maintained, and no tree shall be allowed to grow in any zone created by this Code to a height in excess of the applicable height herein established for such zone. Such applicable height limitations are hereby established for each of the zones in question as follows: A. Utility Runway Visual Approach Zone (Runway 2 20). Slopes 20 feet outward for each foot upward beginning at the end of and at the same elevation as the primary surface and extending to a horizontal distance of 5,000 feet along the extended runway centerline. Runway Larcr Than Utility Visual Approach Zone (Runway 3). Slopes 20 feet outward for each foot upward beginning at the end of an at the same elevation as the primary surface and extending to a horizontal distance of 5,000 feet along the extended runway centerline. A. Conical Zone. Slopes 20 feet outward for each foot upward beginning at the periphery of the horizontal zone and at 150 feet above the airport elevation. B. Excepted Height Limitations. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be construed as prohibiting the construction or maintenance of any structure or growth of any tree to a height up to 35 feet above the surface of the land. C. Horizontal Zone. Established at 150 feet above the airport elevation or at a height of 311 feet above mean sea level (with respect to the North American Datum of 1988 (NAVD D. Medium Intensity Approach Lighting System with Runway Alignment Indicator Lights (MALSR). The primary plane has a total width of 100 feet, 50 feet each side of the runway centerline extended, and a surface that follows the plane of the RAIL System. Beginning at the edge of the primary plane, a secondary plane having a slope of 7:1 extends outward from the edge of the primary plane for a distance of 150 feet. Both primary and secondary planes begin at the last steadyburning lights of the MALSR system and extend 200 feet beyond the last flashing light in the RAIL portion of the MALSR system. An additional secondary plane underlies the 7:1 plane, with a longitudinal slope of 50:1. beginning at the height of the last steady-burning light and extending outward (laterally) to 150 feet from the edge of the primary plane at zero gradient. The surface extends longitudinally to 200 feet Commented [MR1SJ: Oo we need to add this section just so it s documented?

beyond the last flashing light of the RAIL system. No oblect shall penetrate either the primary or secondary plane. Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) Zone (Runway 16 34). Slopes 30 feet outward for each foot upward beginning at centerline perpendicular to the PAPI system at the center height of the PAPI lights and extending to a horizontal distance of ##### feet along extended runway centerline at point of beginning. f Commented [MR16J: Need the distance. GF. Precision Instrument Runway Approach Zone (Runway 16). Slopes 50 feet outward for each foot upward beginning at the end of and at the same elevation as the primary surface and extending to a horizontal distance of 10,000 feet along the extended runway centerline; thence slopes upward 40 feet horizontally for each foot vertically to an additional horizontal distance of 40,000 feet along the extended runway centerline. DG. Transitional Zones. Slopes seven (7) feet outward for each foot upward beginning at the sides of and at the same elevation as the primary surface and the approach surface and extending to a height of 150 feet above the airport elevation, which is 1050, feet above mean sea respect to the North American Datum of 1988 (NAVD-88). In addition to the foregoing, there are established height limits sloping seven (7) feet outward for each foot upward beginning at the sides of and the same elevation as the approach surface and extending to where they intersect the conical surface. Where the precision instrument runway approach zone projects beyond the conical zone, there are established height limits sloping seven (7) feet outward for each foot upward beginning at the sides of and the same elevation as the approach surface and extending a horizontal distance of 5,000 feet at 90 angles to the extended runway centerline. levelith Commented [MR7J: Check this. I m not sure that ist1 correct elevation. 14.22.040 Use Restriction. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Code, no use may be made of land or water within any zone established by this Code in such a manner as to create electrical interference with navigational signals or radio communications between the airport and aircraft, make it difficult for pilots to distinguish between airport lights and others, result in glare in the eyes of pilots using the airport, impair visibility in the vicinity of the airport, create bird strike hazards, or otherwise in any way endanger or interfere with the landing, takeoff, or maneuvering of aircraft intending to use the airport.

Send development proposal to ODA for land use review. 14.22.050 Nonconforming Uses A. Regulations Not Retroactive. The regulations prescribed in this Code shall not be construed to require the removal, lowering, or other change or alteration of any structure or tree not conforming to the regulations as of the effective date of this Ordinance, or otherwise interfere with the continuance of a nonconforming use. Nothing contained herein shall require any change in the construction, alteration, or intended use of any structure, the construction or alteration of which has begun prior to the effective date of this Ordinance and is diligently prosecuted. Commented IMR8I: Jeff Caines sending information for Lditona1_section. Commented [MR19J: Do we want to leave this as is considering there have been slope changes based on new navigation aids that we redefine where trees are obstructions? B. Marking and Lighting. Notwithstanding the preceding provision of this Section, the owner of any existing nonconforming structure or tree is hereby required to permit the installation, operation, and maintenance thereon of such markers and lights as shall be deemed necessary by the City Manager to indicate to the operators of aircraft in the vicinity of the airport and presence of such airport obstruction. Such markers and lights shall be installed, operated, and maintained at the expense of the City of Newport. 14.22.060 Permits A. Future Uses. Except as specifically provided in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3, no material change shall be made in the use of land, no structure shall be erected or otherwise established, and no tree shall be planted in any zone hereby created unless a permit therefore shall have been applied for and granted. Each application for a permit shall indicate the purpose for which the permit is desired, with sufficient particularity to permit it to be determined whether the resulting use, structure, or tree would conform to the regulations herein prescribed. If such determination is in the affirmative, the permit shall be granted. No permit for a use inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance shall be granted unless a variance has been approved in accordance with Section 14.33.001, Adjustments and Variances, and Section 14.43.001, Procedural Requirements.* 1. In the area lying within the limits of the horizontal zone and conical zone, no permit shall be required for any tree or structure less than 50 feet of vertical height above the ground, except when, because of terrain, land contour, or topographic features, such tree or structure would

extend above the height limits prescribed for such zones. 2. In areas lying within the limits of the approach zones but at a horizontal distance of not less than 4,200 feet from each end of the runway, no permit shall be required for any tree or structure less than 50 feet of vertical height above the ground, except when such tree or structure would extend above the height limit prescribed for such approach zones. 3.ln the areas lying within the limits of the transition zones beyond the perimeter of the horizontal zone, no permit shall be required for any tree or structure less than 50 feet of vertical height above the ground, except when such tree or structure, because of terrain, land contour, or topographic features, would extend above the height limit prescribed for such transition zones. 4. In the areas lying within the limits of the departure zone beyond the perimeter of the horizontal zone, no permit shall be required for any tree or structure less than 50 feet of vertical height above the ground, except when such tree or structure, because of terrain, land contour, or topographic features, would extend above the height limit prescribed for such departure zones. Commented [MR2OJ: check height for update. In the areas lying within the limits of the MALSR footings Commented [MR21]: Do we need something in here that no permit will be required for any tree or structure less says it s okay to build a road around the MALSR footings? J than 50 feet of vertical height above the ground, except when such tree or structure, because of terrain, land contour, or topographic features, would extend above the height limit prescribed for the MALSR. Nothing contained in any of the foregoing exceptions shall be construed as permitting or intending to permit any construction, alteration of any structure, or growth of any tree in excess of any of the height limits established by this Ordinance except as set forth in 14.22.030 above. ( Amended by Ordinance No. 1989 (1-1-10).) B. Existing Uses. No permit shall be granted that would allow the establishment or creation of an obstruction or permit a nonconforming use, structure, or tree to become a greater hazard to air navigation than it was on the effective date of

this Code, or any amendments thereto, or than it is when the application for a permit is made. Except as indicated, all applications for such a permit shall be granted. C. Nonconforming Uses Abandoned or Destroyed. Wherever the City Manager determines that a nonconforming tree or structure has been abandoned or more than 80% torn down, physically deteriorated, or decayed, no permit shall be granted that would allow such tree or structure to exceed the applicable height limit or otherwise deviate from the zoning regulations. D. Variances. Any person desiring to erect or increase the height of any structure, or permit the growth of any tree, or use property not in accordance with the regulations prescribed in this Code may apply to the Planning Commission for a variance from such regulations. The application for variance shall be accompanied by a determination from the Federal Aviation Administration as to the effect of the proposal on the operation of air navigation facilities and the safe, efficient use of navigable airspace. Such variances shall be allowed where it is duly found that a literal application or enforcement of the regulations will result in unnecessary hardship, and relief granted will not be contrary to the public interest, will not create a hazard to air navigation, will do substantial justice, and will be in accordance with the spirit of this Code. Variances will be approved in accordance with Section 14.33.001, Adjustments and Variances, and consistent with Section 14.43.001, Procedural Requirements.* Additionally, no application for variance to the requirements of this Code may be considered by the Planning Commission unless a copy of the application has been furnished to the Airport Commission and Airport Manager for advice as to the aeronautical effects of this variance, lithe Airport Manager and Airport Commission do not respond to the application within 30 days after receipt, the Planning Commission may act on its own to grant or deny said application. (*Sentence added by Ordinance Na. 1989 Na. 1989 (1-1-10).) E. Obstruction Marking and Lighting. Any permit or variance granted may, if such action is deemed advisable to effectuate the purpose of this Code and be reasonable in the circumstances, be so conditioned as to require the owner of the structure or tree in question to install, operate, and maintain, at the owners expense, such markings and lights as may be necessary. If deemed proper by the City Council,

this condition may be modified to requite the owner to permit the City of Newport, at its own expense, to install, operate, and maintain the necessary markings and lights. 14.22.070 Lane Uses Within Airport Zones. All structures and uses within the Airport Zones shall conform to the requirements of Federal Aviation Agency Regulation FAR-77, or successor, and to other federal and state laws regulating structural height, smoke, steam, or dust, and other hazards to flight, air navigation, or public health, safety and welfare. Within the various airport zones, certain uses are compatible and certain uses are not because of possible negative effects on either the airport or the use. Such effects on the airport may include danger to property or life from accident, noise, and vibration. Because of these factors, the various underlying zones have been further restricted by the following airport zones: 14.22.080 Obstruction Zone. Includes all areas within conical surface area (14.18.010 to 14.18.060). 14.22.090 Approach Zone. To assure safety, uses in the approach safety zone shall not attract large groups of people. Places of public assembly are therefore prohibited. Most residential uses are also prohibited. Where residential development is already in place, low density is preferred. Retirement homes or other residential institutions are prohibited. While manufacturing is generally quite compatible, such uses are subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Section 14.33.001, Conditional Uses, and Section 14.43.001, Procedural Requirements, and shall be reviewed for potential operations hazards, electrical interference, high intensity lighting, bird attractions, smoke, glare, or other interferences.* Transportation uses are generally compatible as are communications (except radio and television transmission) and utilities (except petroleum storage, electric power plants and lines, and solid waste disposal). Industrial and wholesale uses are generally compatible; however, retail establishments such as restaurants and concentrated retail commercial developments which attract large numbers of people are prohibited. Offices and services are compatible, except rest homes and hospitals. Recreational uses are allowed subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Section 14.33.001, Conditional Uses, and Section 14.43.001, Procedural Requirements, (excluding public assembly and other high intensity uses, which are prohibited).** Resource production, including agriculture and undeveloped land, is

generally compatible. (Aggregate extraction if it will result in ponding and other uses posing a bird strike hazard is excluded.) (*Sentence Amended by Ordinance Na. 1989 (1-1-10). **Sentence Amended by Ordinance Na. 1989 (1-1-10).) 14.22.100 Clear Zones. Clear zones are to be kept clear with no development. Agriculture that does not attract birds is compatible, but no structures are allowed. Above ground power lines are prohibited. Most other uses are excluded. Wherever possible, the clear zone should be free of any construction or obstacle and should be minimally used by people. 14.22.110 Moderate Noise Impact (Ldn 55-65) Zones. Schools, hospitals, nursing homes, theaters, auditoriums, residential developments, and other places of public assembly shall have noise insulation in accordance with the State of Oregon s Department of Environmental Uuality (DEQ) standards and recommendations. Orientation of housing, screening with fences or berms, or other treatment shall be used to reduce awareness of the airport.* 14.22.120 Substantial Noise Impact (Ldn 65+) Zones. Retail, office, or service uses shall not be developed in this substantially impacted area except by conditional use where it can be shown that adequate noise insulation shall be provided and the use is necessary in that location. While motels or other transient lodging with appropriate insulation can be excluded in this zone, single and multi-family housing and mobile home parks are excluded. Schools, libraries, churches, hospitals, nursing homes, and other noise sensitive uses are also to be excluded. Though many recreational uses are compatible, these uses are conditional and shall be reviewed for noise sensitivity and appropriate measures taken. Non-noise sensitive industry, manufacturing, wholesaling, and warehousing, retailing, agriculture, forestry, fishing, mining, and open spaces are allowed uses. Uses mentioned as conditional in this section are allowed subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Section 14.33.001, Conditional Uses, and Section 14.43.001, Procedural Requirements. t**amenued by Ordinance No. 1344 (11-7-83) Sen rence Added by Ordinance No. 1989 (1-1-10).) 14.22.130 Airport Development Zone A. Purpose. The airport development zone is different from the other zones presented. The land in the immediate vicinity of

the airport may be impacted by noise, safety hazards, pollution (not only from the aircraft but from autos accessing the facility), congestion, etc. The combination of these factors and others produce an environment that resembles an industrial setting. An airport requires an area for the growth of the facility, and many types of industry can receive considerable travel and transportation advantage if they are located in close proximity to the airport. The Newport Municipal Airport property is, therefore, set aside and designated as an airport development zone to serve these purposes. B. If the airport development zone grows over time, it should expand in areas impacted by the airport rather than expanding perpendicular to the runway along access routes or other features. It should serve as an airport buffer and include areas receiving severe noise impacts. C. Residential uses other than transient lodging and recreational uses including high concentrations of people are excluded from this zone. Other uses which are acceptable, providing they do not violate any other zones, are airport related uses and include appropriate sound reduction measures. Conditional Uses under E of this section shall follow the provisions of Section 14.33.001, Conditional Uses, and shall be decided using the appropriate Land Use Action decision process as provided by Section 14.43.001, Procedural Requirements. t*sentence Added by Ordinance No. 1909 (1-1-10).) D. Permitted Uses. 1. Accessory buildings and uses whose immediate presence is necessary to the property s aviation function. 2. Aircraft runways and taxiways. 3. Aircraft hangars, storage and tiedown areas. 4. Aircraft sales, repair, and service facilities. 5. Air control facilities. 6. Fuel storage facilities. 7. Parking facilities.

8. Open land for aviation clear zone. 9. Agriculture, excluding the commercial raising of animals that would be adversely affected by aircraft passing overhead. 10. Landscape nurseries, cemeteries, or recreation areas which do not include buildings or structures. 11. Roadways, parking areas, and storage yards located in such a manner that vehicle light will not make it difficult for pilots to distinguish between landing lights and vehicle lights, or result in glare, or in any other way impair visibility in the vicinity of the landing approach. 12. Water impoundment (no closer than 5,000 feet from the airport). 13. Pipeline. 14. underground utility wire. E. Conditional uses. 1. A structure or building accessory for a permitted use. 2. A single-family dwelling, or a commercial or industrial use if permitted in the primary zoning district (subject to Subsection F Limitations). 3. Buildings and uses of public works, public service, or utility nature (subject to Subsection F Limitations). 4. Game preserve or reservation. 5. Airport dependent or related industrial or commercial uses. * 46. Non-Aeronautical commercial and industrial uses. FLESH SECTIONI oui t*adaed by Ordinance No. 1603 (6-17-91).) [mmented CMR22]: Need to develop this section. Che Jeff Caines ODA. F. Limitations. 1. No place of public assembly shall be permitted in an airport approach district.

2. The height of any structure shall be limited by requirements prescribed by the Planning Commission or by any other local ordinance or regulation. 3. Whenever there is a conflict in height limitations prescribed by this Code or another pertinent ordinance, the lowest height limitation fixed shall govern. Provided, however, that the height of other limitations and restrictions here imposed shall not apply to such structures or uses customarily employed for aeronautical purposes. 4. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Code, no use may be made of land or water within any zone established by this Code in such a manner as to create electrical interference with navigational signals or radio communication between the airport and aircraft, make it difficult for pilots to distinguish between airport lights and others, result in glare in the eyes of pilots using the airport, impair visibility in the vicinity of the airport, create bird strike hazards, or otherwise in any way endanger or interfere with the landing, takeoff, or maneuvering of aircraft intending to use the airport.