Agritourism Industry Development in New Jersey

Similar documents
The Economic Contributions of Agritourism in New Jersey

Considering an Agritourism Enterprise?

The Opportunity for Agritourism Development in New Jersey. Brian J. Schilling Lucas J. Marxen Helen H. Heinrich Fran J. A. Brooks, Ph.D.

The Economic Benefits of Agritourism in Missouri Farms

Agritourism in Missouri: A Profile of Farms by Visitor Numbers

California Agritourism Snapshot 2017

The University of Georgia

Agritourism Planning Considerations. Stacey McCullough SWREC Horticulture Field Day June 16, 2016

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. City and Borough of Juneau Mike Satre, Chairman. 6:00 p.m. August 12, 2014

OREGON AGRITOURISM SUMMIT

Economic Impacts of Campgrounds in New York State

Evaluating your resources

Farm Like a Women in Agritourism: Joining Efforts to Succeed!

Connecting Entrepreneurial Communities Conference October 2016

Instructions: Script:

A Snapshot of Tennessee Agritourism

Agritourism Session and Tour Evaluation Summaries from the 2016 Pick TN Conference

LEBANON: A DIVERSE ECOTOURISM DESTINATION IN THE EAST-MEDITERRANEAN. Prepared by: Dr. Jacques Samoury NGER National Expert

California Agritourism Snapshot 2017 Riverside/San Bernardino/San Diego Agritourism Summit March 29, 2017

Making Your Case with the Numbers. Vince Magnini, Ph.D.

The Challenges for the European Tourism Sustainable

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Fort Collins, CO

Agritourism: What does it mean for Rural NC?

Educating People to Help Themselves

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Buncombe County, North Carolina

Economic Impact of Tourism in South Dakota, December 2018

AFRI Project Directors Meeting August Funding of this research project by USDA/AFRI Project # is gratefully acknowledged.

AGRITOURISM PERMIT APPLICATION PROCEDURES

Guidance on Specific State Land-Use Regulations Affecting Agritourism

What benefits do agritourists seek? Suzanne Ainley, Ph.D. Candidate and Bryan Smale, Ph.D. Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies University of

TOURISM STRATEGY TOURISM STRATEGY

Summary of results of the Stakeholder Consultation on Rural, coastal and maritime tourism in the Baltic Sea Region, 16. January - 22.

Mariposa County: Zoning Amendment Agritourism and Agri-Nature Tourism Amendments to County Code

PROPOSAL TO DEVELOP AGRITOURISM IN AUSTRALIA

3/18/2015 BENEFITS OF AGRITOURISM HOW BENEFICIAL IS AGRITOURISM? MEET FOXIE!

T A S M A N I A N G A M B L I N G S E I S I S S U E S P A P E R. Background on the Social and Economic Impact Study of Gambling

Regional Universities Network. Introduction. Regional Universities Network. Economic Impact of the Universities in the Regional Universities Network

~Agritourism~ Stephanie Larson, Ph.D. University of California Cooperative Extension County Director

Economic Impact Analysis. Tourism on Tasmania s King Island

Economic Impact of Tourism. Norfolk

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2016 Economic Impact Report

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

SASP Advisory Committee Meeting #2

Involving Communities in Tourism Development Croatia

Gold Coast: Modelled Future PIA Queensland Awards for Planning Excellence 2014 Nomination under Cutting Edge Research category

Building a Farm Trail; Developing Effective Agritourism Associations

30 th January Local Government s critical role in driving the tourism economy. January 2016 de Waal

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION TO THE GREATER SYDNEY COMMISSION LANDS AT ARTARMON

THE 2006 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TRAVEL & TOURISM IN INDIANA

Crown Corporation BUSINESS PLANS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR Trade Centre Limited. Table of Contents. Business Plan

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2012 Economic Impact Report

Gold Coast. Rapid Transit. Chapter twelve Social impact. Chapter content

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014

The tourism value of the natural environment and outdoor activities in

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas

Canadian Tourism Satellite Account Demystified

Tourism Industry Council Tasmania Community Survey 2018 Research Report. May 2018

VALUE OF TOURISM. Trends from

Economic Impact of Tourism in South Dakota, December 2017

Tourism Impacts and Second Home Development in Pender County: A Sustainable Approach

Submission to. Southland District Council on. Draft Stewart Island/Rakiura Visitor Levy Policy and Bylaw

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

A Proposed Framework for the Development of Joint Cooperation On Nature Conservation and Sustainable Tourism At World Heritage Natural sites.

The Economic Impact of Tourism New Forest Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Tourism Impacts and Second Home Development in Coastal Counties: A Sustainable Approach

Experience the Change

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Walworth County, Wisconsin. July 2013

Fields of Gold Shenandoah Valley Agritourism Initiative

Risk management in Agritourism;

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2014 Economic Impact Report

$1.4 million injection into communities thanks to Glencore community investment program

The Current State of Agritourism Research in the United States

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

The Economic Impact of the 2015 ASICS Los Angeles Marathon. September 2015

Impacts of Visitor Spending on the Local Economy: George Washington Birthplace National Monument, 2004

ASSEMBLY 39TH SESSION

Rural NSW needs a bottom-up strategy to create a better tourism experience.

Summary Report. Economic Impact Assessment for Beef Australia 2015

Submission to. Queenstown Lakes District Council. on the

An Evaluation of the impact

Economic Impact of Kalamazoo-Battle Creek International Airport

The Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011

Farm Tourism Set to Take Off in a Big Way: A Study Based on Analysis of Visitors Satisfactions in Kerala

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

This Executive Summary highlights the results of a multi-year planning process and includes recommendations of the New Jersey Trails Plan.

The Economic Impact of Tourism in The Appalachian Region of Ohio. June 2014

AGRITOURISM RULES Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry Office of the Commissioner La R.S. 9:2795.5

PO Box 257 PO Box 257 PARRAMATTA NSW 2124 PARRAMATTA NSW 2124

Economic Impact of Tourism. Cambridgeshire 2010 Results

The Economic Impact of Tourism in The Appalachian Region of Ohio. June 2016

A Comparison of Agritourism Understanding among Consumers, Providers, and Extension Faculty

Choosing to share your farm

Czech Republic. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

HEALTH SECTOR ECONOMIC INDICATORS REPORT

Israel. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

VIETNAM. Initiative 1 Community-Based Poverty Reduction Tourism Program. Community-Based Poverty Reduction Tourism Program

Case Studies of Agritourism among Small Farmers in North Carolina. Anthony K. Yeboah North Carolina A&T State University

The Economic Impact of Tourism in: Dane County & Madison, Wisconsin. April 2017

Transcription:

Agritourism Industry Development in New Jersey Brian J. Schilling Associate Director, Rutgers Food Policy Institute Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission, Land Use and Housing Committee The Delaware Valley Regional Food System Study June 5, 2008

Food Policy Institute Founded in 1999 as a Rutgers research center to bring the depth of academia s knowledge to bear on pressing issues and challenges facing the food system by providing timely and relevant research that is responsive to the needs of government, industry and the consumer http://foodpolicyinstitute.rutgers.edu/

NJ Farming: 101 The only constant is change Adaptability and innovation are hallmarks of successful New Jersey farmers Changing structure of agriculture (farm size, demographics) Changing commodity mix Diversifying market channels Growing adoption of value added enterprises Evolving product/service mix Declining profitability (?) Varying motivations for farming

State and Local Policy Context Very aggressive farmland preservation efforts Stable statewide funding Dedicated local & county taxes TDR Emerging recognition of the need to plan for agriculture NJ State Development and Redevelopment Plan Efforts to promote local planning Strong right to farm protection Agritourism is recognized in law AMP being developed Municipal pre-emption provision; no public/private nuisance Focus on agricultural economic development

Background An estimated 62 million people visited U.S. farms in 2001* Travel and tourism is HUGE business In 2004 travel & tourism in NJ had an economic impact of $32 billion Many states are now exploring opportunities for agritourism development Anecdotally, agritourism is known to be an important and growing activity in NJ agriculture *National Survey on Recreation and the Environment: 2000-2002. (The Interagency National Survey Consortium - USDA & U. of Tennessee.)

Background In 2004, the New Jersey State Board of Agriculture identified agritourism development as an economic development strategy for bolstering the viability of New Jersey agriculture. In 2005, New Jersey Secretary of Agriculture, Charles Kuperus, convened the New Jersey Agritourism Industry Advisory Council. The purpose of the Council is to assist with the creation and implementation of strategies to advance the economic development opportunities presented by agritourism.

Background In 2005, New Jersey Department of Agriculture (NJDA) commissioned the Rutgers Food Policy Institute (FPI) to conduct a study on agritourism in NJ. Key Objectives: Document the nature of current activities. Identify the challenges experienced by farmers. Identify the perceived opportunities in agritourism. Assess the importance of agritourism to farm viability. Develop recommendations for agritourism industry development. The Opportunity for Agritourism Development in New Jersey released in issued in October 2006. (B. Schilling, L. Marxen, H. Heinrich, & F. Brooks)

Background The NJDA and FPI funded a second study in 2006 to determine the economic importance of agritourism in New Jersey. Key Objectives: Estimate the impact of agritourism on the income of New Jersey farms. Estimate the statewide economic impact of agritourism. The Economic Impact of Agritourism In New Jersey: A 2006 Assessment released in September 2007 (B. Schilling, K. Sullivan and L. Marxen)

Study Methods 2005 Study ~50 interviews with agricultural leaders, Extension faculty, farm support businesses, etc. Non-probability (purposive) sampling approach used Operations drawn from 18 NJ counties 48 structured interviews with current agritourism operators In-person and telephone 2006 Study The New Jersey Field Office of the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NJ-NASS) conducted the survey between April and July 2007. A probability-based random sample (stratified by gross value of farm sales) of 1,500 New Jersey farm operations was selected from the NASS list frame of active farm records. Data collection consisted of two survey mailings and telephone follow-up.

What is Agritourism? Agritourism may be defined broadly as the business of establishing farms as travel destinations for educational and recreational purposes. Includes on-farm direct marketing Fees need not be charged

What is Agritourism? Both studies recognized 5 primary types of agritourism activity: On-farm sales of agricultural products (direct-to-consumer) (E.g., Pick-your own, U-cut Christmas trees, on-farm markets) Educational tourism (E.g., School tours, winery tours, farm work experiences) Entertainment (E.g., Hay rides, corn mazes, petting zoos, haunted barns) Accommodations (E.g., Birthday parties, picnicking, bed & breakfasts) Outdoor recreation (E.g., Horse riding, hunting, fishing, bird watching) Off-farm venues (e.g., community farmers markets, agricultural museums, living history farms, county fairs, etc.) were not included in the study.

Why is Agritourism An Attractive Development Strategy? In New Jersey, and across the United States, agritourism is emerging as an important strategy for bolstering farm profitability. The popularity of agritourism reflects the fact that it offers benefits to both the farmer, as well as the public and local communities.

Why is Agritourism Important for New Jersey Farms? Allows farmers to generate additional income from farm assets that may be underutilized or idle for long periods of time. Enables farmers to diversify product lines and markets. Affords farmers the opportunity to receive feedback from consumers regarding preferences for farm products and services. Provides a venue for educating children (and adults) about the state s agrarian heritage, food production, and resource stewardship. Creates a culture of understanding reduces conflict & strengthens public support for farm retention

Why is Agritourism Important for New Jersey Farms? Enhances the quality of life in communities by expanding recreational opportunities, promoting the retention of agricultural lands, and diversifying economic bases. Retains working agricultural landscapes that reflect the efforts of generations of farm families and often provide a defining sense of culture, heritage, and rural character. Provides consumers with access to fresh, locally-produced farm products. Generates economic benefits beyond the farm gate.

How Many New Jersey Farms Offer Agritourism Activities? In 2006, more than one-fifth of New Jersey farms offered some form of agritourism. A higher proportion of New Jersey s larger farms (e.g., farms with sales of $250,000+) report agritourism activities. It is estimated that 43% of New Jersey s total land in farms is associated with farm operations engaged in agritourism. (Schilling et al. 2007)

Reasons for Starting Agritourism? No Surprises! (Source: Schilling et al. 2006) Very Important Somewhat Important Not at All Important Generate additional revenue Improve relationship with community Educate public about agriculture Diversify activities on farm Keep family members involved in farm 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Pct. of Respondents (n=48)

Regardless of how or why farmers entered into the business of agritourism (based on 48 farmer interviews) all respondents saw it as critical to the future viability of their farms and the state s agricultural industry 90% felt agritourism was very important to the economic viability of NJ farms 79% foresee significant or moderate growth in agritourism within their own counties 67% plan on expanding their agritourism enterprises (Source: Schilling et al. 2006)

Evolution of Agritourism Complimentary to growth in on-farm direct marketing Increase patronage of farm retail outlets Often incremental expansion over time Supplemental (in some cases primary) income source May supplant production as primary activity

Sidenote: Many farmers do not relate to the term agritourism but rather see such activities as innovative marketing strategies Some farmers object to the term, opposing the connotation that farms are akin to theme-parks Many are quick to note that agritourism has been taking place for many years

How Much Agritourism Revenue Do New Jersey Farms Generate? Income from agritourism activities on New Jersey farms totaled $57.53 million in 2006. Activity On-farm Sales of Ag. Products (direct-to-consumer) Outdoor Recreation Entertainment Educational Tourism Accommodations Total 2006 Revenues ($million) $40.54 $9.19 $5.42 $1.88 $0.50 $57.53 Pct. of Agritourism Revenues 70.5% 16.0% 9.4% 3.3% 0.9% 100.0%

Agritourism & Total Farm Income Among Farms with Agritourism in 2006: 19% 24% Based on farmers own estimates, 36 percent earn 100% of total farm income from agritourism. The large majority of these farms are small, producing less than $50,000 in total gross farm sales. 36% 7% 9% 5% 52 percent earn at least half of their farm income from agritourism. Pct. of Farm Income from Agritourism (Among Farms with Agritourism) 0% 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 74-99% 100%

Breakdown of Agritourism Revenue by Size of Gross Farm Sales Gross Farm Sales Class <$10,000 $10,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $249,999 $250,000+ All Farms Pct. of Farms with Agritourism 17.0% 28.7% 25.5% 21.7% 38.0% 21.5% Average Agritourism Revenue* $3,453 $22,880 $31,609 $35,162 $124,961 $27,093 Median Agritourism Revenue* $800 $2,569 $5,000 $5,200 $3,000 $1,173 * Average and median agritourism revenue estimates are based on in-sample analysis.

Measuring the Statewide Economic Impact of Agritourism IMPLAN, a widely used input-output modeling system, was used to measure the economic linkages between agritourism and the rest of the NJ economy. For every dollar in agritourism sales generated on a NJ farm, $0.58 of additional sales are generated in other businesses (e.g., restaurants, construction companies, insurance providers, etc.). Therefore, agritourism creates an additional $33.29 million in revenue in other businesses.

Summary of the Economic Impact of Agritourism in New Jersey Total Agritourism Revenues (Farm Level) Total Revenues Generated in Supporting Businesses Total Sales Impact of Agritourism $57.53 million $33.29 million $90.82 million Net Value Added by Agritourism to NJ Economy $59.41 million Total State and Local Taxes Generated as a Result of Agritourism (Farms + Supporting Businesses) $8.09 million

Top 5 Agritourism Operator Challenges (Based on pct. of respondents identifying issue as very significant ) Issue Marketing operation Liability exposure (& insurance) Interaction with the public Availability of employees Biosecurity Very Significant 54% 44% 38% 33% 29% Somewhat Significant 17% 29% 13% 31% 19% (Source: Schilling et al. 2006)

Other Challenges Access to information on agritourism (25 percent) Training of employees (25 percent) Municipal regulations (17 percent) State regulations (17 percent) Access to financing/capital (13 percent) Farmland preservation restrictions (0 percent) (Numbers in parentheses represents pct. of respondents identifying issue as very significant ) (Source: Schilling et al. 2006)

An Observation and A Caution Farmers acknowledge that agritourism does have its downsides and is not for everyone Fear of a litigious public Intrusion into one s privacy (for most, the farm is also a home) Concern that agritourism cheapens the image of farming Possible tensions with neighbors and municipalities New business model for many farmers Most farmers do not have formal business or marketing plans Increased risk level for capital investments New skill sets required (e.g., hospitality, retail marketing, customer service, providing customer experiences)

Strengthening the Foundation for Agritourism Development Aid farmers in developing new business models & business skills Clarify right to farm protections Explore limited liability protection Create statewide promotion/marketing platform www.visitnjfarms.org

Interested in visiting a farm near you? Visit the State s new interactive agritourism website to locate 120 farm destinations with a variety of onfarm fun and activities! www.visitnjfarms.org

For More Information Please Contact Brian Schilling Associate Director, Rutgers Food Policy Institute Rutgers School of Environmental and Biological Sciences & New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station ASB III, 3 Rutgers Plaza New Brunswick, NJ 08901 Tel: (732) 932-1966 ext. 3106 FAX: (732) 932-9544 schilling@aesop.rutgers.edu