Lake Tahoe Shoreline Plan 03 Policy Topic: Access Issues

Similar documents
CHAPTER 5. Chapter 5 Recreation Element

RE: Access Fund Comments on Yosemite National Park Wilderness Stewardship Plan, Preliminary Ideas and Concepts

January 14, Orange County Transportation Authority Attn: M2 NCCP/HCP 550 South Main Street P.O. Box Orange, CA

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

Lake Myra County Park. Wake County, North Carolina Community Forum #2 June 12, 2008

Flow Stand Up Paddle Board Parkway Plan Analysis

Header i

Kelly Field at Port San Antonio Airport Master Plan

Proposed Action. Payette National Forest Over-Snow Grooming in Valley, Adams and Idaho Counties. United States Department of Agriculture

Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land

BACKCOUNTRY TRAIL FLOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM

City of Chelan Shoreline Public Access Plan

Strengthening the Ontario Trails Strategy. Report on Consultations and the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE

KOOTENAY LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK (MIDGE CREEK SITE)

Town of Lake Lure Request for Proposals to Provide Beach, Marina and Tour Boat Operations

City of Chelan Shoreline Public Access Plan

SAXON HARBOR REDEVELOPMENT SURVEY

Proposal to Redevelop Lower Kananaskis River-Barrier Lake. Bow Valley Provincial Park. Frequently Asked Questions

FINAL TESTIMONY 1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. July 13, 2005 CONCERNING. Motorized Recreational Use of Federal Lands

City of Fort Lauderdale. Frequently Asked Questions. Proposed Sea Wall Ordinance

Central Alberta Destination Management Plan. CARL Presentation May 14, 2016 Sylvan Lake, AB

Public Submissions in response to the Bill closed on 2 July 2015 and Council lodged a copy of the submission provided as Attachment 1.

Preferred Recreation Recommendations Stemilt-Squilchuck Recreation Plan March 2018

SUMMER VILLAGE OF SILVER SANDS. Municipal Development Plan

SAN MARTIN BUSINESS PLAN COMMUNITY MEETING

CHAPTER 4 - COMMENTS AND COORDINATION Introduction Comments and Responding to Comments

Thaidene Nëné Proposed National Park Reserve. Public Consultation in Yellowknife, NWT June 2016 Protected Areas Establishment Branch Parks Canada 1

NEWBORO AND PORTLAND HARBOUR REDVELOPMENT PLANS

PURPOSE AND NEED. Introduction

Serving the Tampa Bay Maritime Community Since Celebrating over 125 Years of Service

Chair and Members of Harbour East - Marine Drive Community Council. Brad Anguish, Director, Parks and Recreation

Rogue River Access and Management Plan Draft Alternatives

HOMEWOOD MOUNTAIN RESORT SKI AREA MASTER PLAN EIR/EIS

Submission to NSW Koala Strategy Consultation Process. March 2017

Finn Creek Park. Management Direction Statement Amendment

DRAFT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE / PROPOSED ACTION

Transportation Impact Assessment Paradise Shores RV Resort Development Stettler County, Alberta Progress Update February 2018 PO#

Pillar Park. Management Plan

ARRIVALS REVIEW GATWICK

Use of the Lakes, Streams, and Waters located at Saint John s

Welcome to the future of Terwillegar Park a Unique Natural Park

ACTION PLAN FOR THE PERIOD concerning the STRATEGY ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON THE SAVA RIVER BASIN

BOAT DOCKS AND LAUNCHES. Public Engagement Report July 2015

Port Everglades Master/Vision Plan Update

HARBOR INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORIES Erie Harbor, PA

Understanding the caring capacity of the visitor experience Provide facilities to support a high level user experience Address visual quality through

Lake Tahoe Airport Master Plan Public Meeting March 16, 2015

As outlined in the Tatshenshini-Alsek Park Management Agreement, park management will:

Project Fiche MASTER PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE NAUTICAL TOURISM IN THE SAVA RIVER BASIN

Land Management Summary

Federal Aviation Administration. Airport Land Use Compatibility Advisory Circular ACI-NA / FAA. FAA HQ Washington, DC March 27, 2013

10/25/2013. What is the SCORP?! 2013 Local Government Survey 2013 Statewide Public Survey Advisory Group Priority Areas Your Suggestions!

Blueways: Rivers, lakes, or streams with public access for recreation that includes fishing, nature observation, and opportunities for boating.

A GUIDE TO MANITOBA PROTECTED AREAS & LANDS PROTECTION

2015 PURDUE ROAD SCHOOL March 11, 2015

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Buncombe County, North Carolina

Appalachian Power Company Smith Mountain Hydroelectric Project FERC No Debris Management Plan

Decision Memo for Desolation Trail: Mill D to Desolation Lake Trail Relocation

FLL Master Plan Update BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BRIEFING

Norfolk International Airport

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

Tahoe National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation

DEVELOPING A PLAN FOR SOUTH EAST S WATERWAYS

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

JOSLIN FIELD, MAGIC VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT DECEMBER 2012

VENTURA PORT DISTRICT

1803 West Hwy 160 Monte Vista, CO (719) TTY (719)

Section II. Planning & Public Process Planning for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail began in 2010 as a City of Minnetrista initiative.

Waterfront Concept Plan: Community Survey Summary

4.0 Context for the Crossing Project

Draft Marine and Harbour Facilities Strategy

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

CHAPTER 4 -- THE LAND USE PLAN: DESCRIPTIONS AND POLICIES FOR THIRTEEN PLANNING AREAS

MEETING CONCLUSIONS. Andean South America Regional Meeting Lima, Peru 5-7 March ECOTOURISM PLANNING

Love Field Customer Facility Charge Ordinance

RIVER ACCESS STRATEGY

Parkland County Municipal Development Plan Amendment Acheson Industrial Area Structure Plan

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT REPORT PURPOSE EXISTING SETTING EXPANDING PARKLAND

DRAFT Appendix A Appendix B. Planning Process & Public Participation

FILE: /PERM EFFECTIVE DATE: May 16, 2014 AMENDMENT:

Memorandum. Federal Aviation Administration. Date: June 19, Richard Doucette, Environmental Protection Specialist. From: To:

Miller/ Knox Regional Shoreline

Westover Metropolitan Airport Master Plan Update

DEVELOPMENT PERMIT STAFF COMMITTEE REPORT JUNE 19, 2013 CITY OF VANCOUVER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

EXHIBIT K TERMINAL PROJECT PROCEDURES PHASE I - DEVELOPMENT OF TERMINAL PROGRAM & ALTERNATIVES

Buck Island Reef National Monument News Release Date: Immediate Contact: Joel Tutein, Superintendent, x 222

Executive Summary Downtown Park Fund Allocation HEARING DATE: MAY 5, 2016

2016 Regional Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Grant Application

MANAGEMENT DIRECTION STATEMENT June, 1999

STUDY OVERVIEW MASTER PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Policy. Huts, Cabins and Lodges in BC Provincial Parks

CEDAR BAYOU WATER PARK and AQUATIC CENTER Feasibility Study Executive Summary November 15, 2016

National Park Service Wilderness Action Plan

Final General Management Plan/Wilderness Study/Environmental Impact Statement:

2014 STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE OUTDOOR RECREATION PLAN

Securing Permanent Protection for Public Land

Arlington County Board Work Session Eastbound Widening January 17, Amanda Baxter, VDOT Special Projects Development Manager

communication tower means a tower or structure built to support equipment used to transmit communication signals;

MURRAY REGIONAL TOURISM BOARD. Destination Management Plan Presentation

Transcription:

Lake Tahoe Shoreline Plan 03 Policy Topic: Access Issues V9 Last Updated 03.10.2017

1 Brief Description Physical access to the waters of Lake Tahoe is one of the key issues surrounding the Shoreline Plan and was emphasized in stakeholder input. There is a strong perception that demand for visitor and local lake access is growing each year. Some stakeholders would like to see boat access and moorage opportunities expanded while others would like to see boating restricted. Some stakeholders would also like to ensure the impacts from increased boat traffic are fully understood before expansion of such access is granted. Emphasis on increased recreational access was noted in the recent stakeholder interviews. Some comments included interest in expanding existing or developing new public access ramps, allowing additional piers for non-boating activities such as fishing, swimming, and viewing the lake, and promoting a variety of opportunities for the public to enjoy the water including non-motorized access points. With unmet demand for watercraft access, it is likely that the number of concessionaires providing alternative options will also likely increase. These concessionaires range from motorized and non-motorized watercraft rentals to parasailing experiences and transportation services. Several concerns have been raised regarding the permitted uses of these concessionaires and whether they follow any set guidelines. Since the 1980s, public acquisition has put 90 percent of Tahoe s land into public ownership (75% US Forest Service, 15% States and local governments). As a result of these acquisitions, approximately 43% of the 72 miles of Lake Tahoe shoreline is currently under public ownership. Action Items Action Item Definitions needed for Concessionaires Identify Issues Date Done Jan 2017 Done June 2016 Name TRPA staff and Steering Committee Steering Committee

2 Statement of Intent This memo provides a summary of relevant issues identified during scoping of the Shoreline Plan with the intent of providing context and background in support of the overall planning effort. The Shoreline Steering Committee s discussion of these issues has been ongoing since early 2016. Policy Issues to Consider in the Shoreline Plan General It may not be feasible to provide access or increased access to every location around the lake. The availability of existing access and development of future access points should account for limits that the resources and the specific recreational experience can withstand. Shoreline access is important to stakeholders, both visitors and residents. The lack of access to beaches that are quasi-public emerged as a concern during the public input process with some stakeholders advocating that beach access be available to the public. The addition of new buoys, new boat ramps or expansion of existing ramps, and increased concessions such as watercraft rentals, are likely to increase boat traffic on the lake. Increased boat traffic may have environmental impacts that need to be mitigated directly or indirectly, and may change the experience of the lake for visitors and residents. The Joint Fact Finding Committee is tasked with consolidating known scientific studies related to boating impacts. This information will assist in policy development related to mitigation needs to understand what type and level of mitigation may be most appropriate. Public Piers for Swimming, Viewing, Fishing 1 Public access structures for non-boating recreational opportunities include piers for swimming, viewing the lake, and fishing, most of which are located on public land with the intent of allowing access to the general public. In some instances, such as some private marinas, public access may be allowed for viewing and other recreational purposes. 1 Policy recommendations for public piers are discussed in the Pier Memo (#05)

3 It may not always be clear as to what structures are considered public access structures and what kind of access they are providing. It is important to understand which structures are considered public and how many are available along the shoreline. Ramps Drought conditions and corresponding low water levels emphasize the importance of careful planning for low lake conditions, including the option of future dredging to improve existing boat access, expansion of existing boat ramps or the creation of new ramp locations. Extensions of existing ramps to deeper water may be an alternative. Some solutions for ramp extensions may be temporary depending upon the year to year conditions. Impact areas from ramp extensions should be assessed during Joint Fact Finding. Prior planning looked to cap the number of new public ramps and specifically, no new ramps were to be allowed in spawning habitat. The Joint Fact Finding process has provided an inventory of existing public and private ramps. New public ramps may serve as a low lake level adaptation strategy and address perceptions of increased demand to launch boats at existing public ramps. Marinas There are 14 marinas located on Lake Tahoe, 12 marinas are in California and two are in Nevada. Marinas are operated by private entities, but are generally open to the public and provide a main source of access to Lake Tahoe. Marinas are addressed in a separate memorandum. Non-Motorized Access Some comments have included concern regarding the availability of water access for non-motorized watercraft. Similarly, providing safe access and navigation for such watercraft, especially when adjacent to motorized boat launch facilities, is important. Storage of non-motorized watercraft close to the beach by concessionaires, HOAs, or other groups, may minimize impacts to recreational access and nearshore environmental condition by reducing the scattering of such watercraft laterally along the shoreline and providing a secure storage location. Water Trail

4 Since 2003, the California Tahoe Conservancy (CTC) and volunteer Lake Tahoe Water Trail Association (LTWTA) has played a major role in the development of the 72-mile water route for kayaks, paddle boards, and other non-motorized watercraft around Lake Tahoe. The Water Trail project provides information on where to access and exit the lake for day and overnight trips, protecting Lake Tahoe from AIS, and safety recommendations. There is an interest in providing additional signage from land or on the water to help people identify where to exit the lake. More information on the Water Trail can be found at [laketahoewatertrail.org/explore-water-trail/] Concessionaires The definition of concessionaire is unclear to some, but they would include commercial uses that may be transient or semi-permanent along the shoreline to sell goods or services. Water-oriented outdoor recreation concessions are defined in the TRPA Code as Water-oriented outdoor recreation uses, such as food and beverage facilities at public beaches; fishing guide services; parasailing; recreation equipment rental (e.g., boats, wind surfing and beach equipment); but not including boat slips, boat and engine repair or the sale of fuel (Section 81.5.14). Often the concessionaires being discussed as part of the Shoreline Plan are those with rental related businesses, renting motorized or non-motorized watercraft. It is believed by some that not all concessionaires are being regulated and it is not clear if and how they would be permitted. In some cases the concessionaire activities seem to overwhelm general public access to a beach. There is a balance that is needed to provide different types of recreational access to the lake with these concessions versus just general visitors to the beach. Concessionaires provide a service to visitors which may enhance their experience of the lake. However, there may be environmental impacts that are not being addressed or mitigated. Some concessionaires preclude the use of the beach or access laterally along the beach due to those activities. Several concerns related to concessionaires have been discussed. These include: The potential to increase demand for boat capacity Are there preferred areas for concessions to be located Are best practices being utilized (i.e. fueling practices)

5 Will increased concessions also increase demand for parking How best to mitigate for potential increase in boat related impacts Are there allowances for certain types of concessions which have less impact (e.g. electric or solar boats) No-Wake Zone The no-wake zone is an area close to shore which provides navigational safety for boaters and non-motorized watercraft and shoreline erosion protection from boat wakes. The no-wake zone currently measures 600 feet waterward from the water s edge. Public comments have recommended extending no-wake zones in certain areas with high levels of non-motorized activity. Related Policy Issues AIS Additional boat access to the water and overall boat traffic across the lake is a concern because it may increase the likelihood of spreading existing AIS already in the lake as well as the potential to introduce new AIS into Lake Tahoe. Recreational Access along Shoreline Lateral public access along the shoreline via the Public Trust Doctrine is addressed differently between states. In both California and Nevada, Public Trust lands begin waterward of the low water mark (Elevation 6,223 feet, Lake Tahoe Datum). In California, a Public Trust Easement exists between the low water mark and high water mark (Elevation 6229 feet, Lake Tahoe Datum). TRPA must assess the impacts of new structures on recreational access. Joint Fact-Finding The Joint Fact Finding Committee has evaluated the questions listed below. Currently, draft memos and meeting summaries are available at ShorelinePlan.org under Joint Fact Finding Committee meeting materials. Findings from the Joint Fact Finding Committee will be disclosed in the

6 environmental review. Maps providing an inventory of public access points are available via ShorelinePlan.org General Access An inventory of the different types of public access (i.e. public beaches, piers for mooring and/or viewing, and ramps/launches) is needed. Where are public access points located? What information do we have regarding the economic benefits of lake access? What are the environmental impacts associated with increased dispersed recreation? Boating Where and how do people access the lake for motorized or nonmotorized boat use? How many people currently access the lake for motorized or nonmotorized boat use? Concessionaires What are the best practices for fueling outside of fueling stations? Are other types of watercraft (e.g. electric or solar boats) being used by concessionaires? Existing Data, Information and Science Watercraft Rental Concessionaire Survey In 2014, TRPA surveyed 44 watercraft rental locations around the lake. Data collected included how many and what type of craft were available for rent, what facilities were used for storage, and fueling type. Non-motorized Access/Water Trail Per the water trail website, there are 39 public launch/landing sites and 17 day landing sites [laketahoewatertrail.org/explore-water-trail/]. The water trail

7 website provides a detailed map of access locations. The California Tahoe Conservancy along with the Lake Tahoe Water Trail Association provides a robust boater education and safety program that it is implementing at Lake Tahoe. The US Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, marinas, and other recreation providers facilitate safety and boater information. Existing Codes Public Access The following Regional Plan policy encourages public access to be located on public land and also promotes the expansion of public ownership as a means to facilitate additional public access where it is deemed appropriate given environmental conditions. SZ-1.13 ALLOW PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE SHOREZONE WHERE LAWFUL AND FEASIBLE ON PUBLIC LANDS. There is considerable demand for public use of the Lake Tahoe shoreline. Increased opportunities to use the shoreline shall be provided when consistent with the tolerance levels of the shorezone. Improved access to the shorezone should be provided through public lands from expanded public ownership. Trails and support facilities in the backshore should be consistent with the goals and policies of the Recreation Element. Fueling 84.5.2 Design and Construction Standards (Piers) E. Fueling facilities shall not be permitted on piers located adjacent to littoral parcels on which the primary use is residential.