Queenstown Lakes District Council Review of District Plan Business Zones Capacity and Development of Zoning Hierarchy McDermott Miller Strategies Limited in association with Allan Planning & Research Limited 15 November 213 ANNEXURES Queenstown Lakes District Council
Queenstown Lakes District Council McDermott Miller Limited,
Annex I Household Growth Queenstown Lakes District Council
ANNEX I HOUSEHOLD GROWTH A I.1 ESTIMATES OF HOUSEHOLD GROWTH Questions and answers with Stats NZ on treatment of apartments in census and household projections During the project we corresponded with Statistics NZ on issues of how apartments are classified and how overseas visitors working in New Zealand are treated. We were told that apartments (which are used for both short term visitor accommodation and residential purposes in Queenstown) classified in the census are likely to have been treated inconsistently from block to block in the census. In some cases they will have been counted as private dwellings, others as non-private. On the whole the likelihood is that most were counted as non-private, even if they have working occupants. We were told the census standard (which reflects 26 experience) classes them as non-private. A separate house occupied (on census night) by non-usually resident people is classified as occupied permanent private dwelling, assuming someone completed the dwelling questionnaire, and for household counts it is a visitor-only household. If usual residents are counted back to where they live, it falls out of household counts. But it is still counted in a the Census Night count of occupied dwellings. "Visitor-only households" is a household ie is included are included in a census-night occupied dwelling counts, but area excluded from household counts based on place of usual residence. Young person working in Queenstown, and is permitted to do so. work is included as part of the usually resident population count for Queenstown. Statistics NZ s household estimates (outside Census years) and projections are based on resident population, not Census night population, so visitor-only households are excluded in this case. In theory households projections will have some type of adjustment for census night undercount. AI.2 EXTENT OF NON-QUEENSTOWN OWNERSHIP OF DWELLINGS HIGH RATES OF EXTERNAL OWNERSHIP OF DWELLINGS We requested, and were provided, with comprehensive data from QLDC s rating and GIS systems on: Address of property owners (ie ratepayers) and location of properties, including whether owner live overseas. Nature of improvements on properties Land and capital values of properties Value of improvement put to a range of uses Queenstown Lakes District Council AI-Page 1
Geostatistical data on each property relevant meshblock and area unit codes We have analysed this data to address the following data deficiencies: In the absence of a 211 census, there is no definitive estimate of the number of current households in the District. There is not definitive data on the number of QLD dwellings that are second/holiday homes. The closest are the 26 figures in the Queenstown Lakes District Growth Projections report (Rationale, March 211, and supporting spreadsheet available for download from www.qldc.govt.nz) that on Census night 26 there were 1,851 unoccupied dwellings in Wakatipu (22% of total dwellings) and 1,577 in Wanaka (34%) for a total of 3428 (26%). This is important in estimating resident s retail spend, i.e. the amount of retail spend that will support retailing targeting the resident, rather visitor, markets. The analysis depends on how apartments are classified for rating purposes ie as dwelling or accommodation (ie commercial accommodation). A caveat on this assessment is that we were informed by QLDC officials that this classification does not necessarily accurately reflect how the apartment is actually being used. RESULTS This analysis indicates there are now some 14,75 dwellings in Queenstown Lakes District, up 1,145 from the 12,93 (952 Occupied, 3,428 unoccupied) in the 26 Census (source: Growth Projections report). We have been provided with residential building consents data for 26-12 by Lakes Environmental, but it has not been able to provide us with data on how many of these have actually been built. There were 2369 new dwelling building consents issued over the 26-211 period, so on this analysis only 5% (plus those replacing existing dwellings) have been put in place. By this estimate, current dwellings are now 8.4% less than the projected 15,254 presented in the Growth Projections report. The analysis indicates some 6,119 (43%) dwellings are owned by individuals and companies located outside the District. This percentage is higher (48%) for Wanaka than for Wakatipu (41%). Overseas owners own 1,127 dwellings (8% of the total). This group owns 1% of Wakatipu dwellings, and 5% of Wanaka dwellings. Residents of other NZ districts own 4,992 dwellings, 36% of the total (31% of Wakatipu dwellings and 43% of Wanaka dwellings). Queenstown Lakes District Council AI-Page 2
Conclusion We conclude from this analysis that: Growth in dwellings in the District is tracking substantially below the 211 Growth Projections rate. Levels of second/holiday home ownership are higher than conventionally estimated. (based on the Census) Taken together this suggests both the current amount of residential generated retail spend and its growth rate are lower than presented by retail experts in recent Queenstown Lakes District resource managements hearings. SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF THESE DWELLINGS Figure AI.1 ranks area units (211 definition) by distribution of locally and out-of-district owned dwellings in absolute terms, and Figure AI.2 does this in terms of percentages The area unit with the highest percentage of dwellings in local ownership (85%) and lowest overseas ownership (15%), is Lake Hayes Frankton East (8%) and Arthur s Point (77%) also have high rates of local ownership. The area unit with the highest percentage of dwelling in out-ofdistrict ownership is Queenstown Hill (57%). This also has the second to highest number in absolute terms (1,9) Wanaka area unit is the area unit the third to highest percentage in out of district ownership (51%). It has the largest number of dwellings in both local (2,24) and out-of-district ownership (2,13) Figure AI.1 Ownership of Dwellings by 211 Area Unit Wanaka Queenstown Hill Arrowtown Hawea Sunshine Bay Frankton 211 Area Unit Queenstown Bay Kelvin Heights Wakatipu Basin Lake Hayes South Outer Wakatipu Arthurs Point Frankton East Kingston South Matukituki Glenorchy Queenstown Lakes District Owned Out of District Owned Lake Hayes Jacks Point 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 22 No. Source: McDermott Miller Estimates based on Queenstown Lakes District rating database McDermott Miller Limited, 212 Queenstown Lakes District Council AI-Page 3
Figure AI.2 Ownership of Dwellings 211 Area Unit Lake Hayes South Frankton East Arthurs Point Wakatipu Basin Matukituki Outer Wakatipu Glenorchy Lake Hayes Frankton Jacks Point Hawea Kelvin Heights Queenstown Bay Arrowtown Sunshine Bay Wanaka Kingston South Queenstown Hill % 2% 4% 6% 8% 1% No. Queenstown Lakes District Owned Out of District Owned Source: McDermott Miller Estimates based on Queenstown Lakes District rating database McDermott Miller Limited, 212 DEMAND FOR RETAIL AND OTHER SERVICES Figure AI.3 below illustrates household growth projections in Queenstown Lakes District under a range of scenarios. The Queenstown Lakes District Growth Projections report (Rationale, March 211) lie between the Statistics NZ Medium and High projections (not shown below); under this projection there would be 14,5 households in the District by 221. Growth assessed at similar rates to this underlie the retail demand growth assessments used in Plan change 19 and 34 reports and evidence. Using the Statistics NZ Medium household projection there would be 14, households in 221 or 3.5% below the Growth Projection report projection. Under the Statistics NZ Low household projection there would be 13,5 households in 221 or 13% below the Growth Projection report projection By contrast, Figure AI.3 shows a projection based on the estimate of Queenstown-owned dwellings discussed above, on the assumption that these dwellings grow at the same annual percentage rate as the Statistics NZ medium projection. Under this projection, there would be some 9,8 Queenstown owned dwellings in 211 32% below the 211 Growth Projections report 1. 1 N.B. Queenstown Lakes District Council AI-Page 4
This projection understates permanently occupied dwellings, because an (unknown) number of apartments and detached dwellings are occupied more or less permanently by a succession of tenants who individual reside and work in Queenstown for only 6 months or so. However, it also suggests the Growth Projections report and Statistics NZ Medium projections may be overstating permanently occupied dwelling (ie household) numbers. This projection, taken together with the uncertainties in the census count of occupants of apartments, is an indication that retail household and retail spend projections underlying retail planning to date are significantly overstated. We suggest that when 213 census data becomes available a Queenstown Lakes District Council commission (if necessary) a detailed custom analysis of the data to distinguish permanently occupied dwellings from those occupied temporarily by workers. 1. This figure assumes all non-qld-owned dwellings are unoccupied year round. 2. Renters and other occupiers of one kind or another mean that an unknown proportion of these 5,3 dwellings are occupied for some time of the year. 3. Question therefore is what is the realistic estimate of the overstatement of dwellings in the SNZ estimates and the 211 Growth Projections Report? Queenstown Lakes District Council AI-Page 5
Figure AI.3 Queenstown Lakes District Projected Households Number 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Growth Projections Report 211 Statistics NZ Medium Statistics NZ Low Queenstown Owned Dwellings 26 211 216 221 226 231 Year Source: Statistics NZ Household Projections, published 13 December 21 and downloaded September 211. Average projection in supporting spreadsheet to Queenstown Lakes District Growth Projections report (Rationale, March 211, available for download from www.qldc.govt.nz): shown. McDermott Miller estimates and projections based on QLDC rating database; McDermott Miller Limited, December 212 Queenstown Lakes District Council AI-Page 6
Annex II Multiplier Effects Under the Economic Growth Scenarios Queenstown Lakes District Council
ANNEX II: MULTIPLIER EFFECTS UNDER THE ECONOMIC GROWTH SCENARIOS Output Figure AII.1 below presents total output, including direct, indirect and induced effects increase under each of the economic growth scenarios. Figure AII.1: Total Output (including indirect and induced effects) Increase by Economic growth Scenarios Queenstown Lakes District 32 3 28 26 24 22 2 Tourism Driven Variant 3: Twin Hub Tourism Driven Variant 2 Tourism Driven Variant 1 Status Quo Retail Driven $ million 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Source: McDermott Miller Estimates McDermott Miller Limited, December 212 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 22 221 Value Added 222 Year 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 23 231 Figure AII.2 below presents total value added (contribution to district GDP), including direct, indirect and induced effects increase under each of the economic growth scenarios. Queenstown Lakes District Council AII-Page 1
Figure AII.2: Total Value Added Increase (including indirect and induced effects) Increase by Economic growth Scenarios 16 15 14 13 12 11 1 Tourism Driven Variant 3: Twin Hub Tourism Driven Variant 2 Tourism Driven Variant 1 Status Quo Retail Driven $ million 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Source: McDermott Miller Estimates McDermott Miller Limited, December 212 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 22 221 222 Year 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 23 231 Queenstown Lakes District Council AII-Page 2
Gross Household Income Figure AII.3 below illustrated increase in gross household income under each of the economic growth scenarios. Figure AII.3: Gross Household Income Increase by Economic growth Scenarios 1 $ million 9 8 7 6 5 4 Tourism Driven Variant 3: Twin Hub Tourism Driven Variant 2 Tourism Driven Variant 1 Status Quo Retail Driven 3 2 1 Source: McDermott Miller Estimates McDermott Miller Limited, December 212 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 22 221 222 Year 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 23 231 Queenstown Lakes District Council AII-Page 3
Employment Figure AII.4 below illustrated increase in employment under each of the economic growth scenarios. Figure AII.4: Total Employment (including indirect and induced effects) Increase by Economic growth Scenarios 22 2 18 16 14 Tourism Driven Variant 3: Twin Hub Tourism Driven Variant 2 Tourism Driven Variant 1 Status Quo Retail Driven Number 12 1 8 6 4 2 Source: McDermott Miller Estimates McDermott Miller Limited, December 212 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 22 221 222 Year 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 23 231 Queenstown Lakes District Council AII-Page 4
Annex III Employment Expansion Under the Economic Growth Scenarios in Wakatipu-Arrowtown and Wanaka Queenstown Lakes District Council McDermott Miller Limited,
ANNEX III: EMPLOYMENT EXPANSION UNDER THE ECONOMIC GROWTH SCENARIOS IN WAKATIPU- ARROWTOWN AND WANAKA Figure AIII.1 below ranks industries in descending order of employment growth in Wakatipu-Arrowtown under the Tourism Driven Variant 3: Twin Hub scenario and compares this with growth under the Status Quo scenario. Figure AIII.1: Total Employment (including indirect and induced effects) Increase by Economic growth Scenarios and industry group in WAKATIPU AND ARROWTOWN Wards: Growth to 221 Accommodation Restaurant and bars Sport and recreation Other personal and household good retailing Other business services Road transport Personal and private household services & household employed staff Air transport, services to transport and storage Libraries, museum and the arts Industry Water and rail transport Motor vehicle retailing and services Supermarkets, grocery stores and furniture, houseware appliances and recreational goods retailing Legal and accounting services Specialized food and liquor retailing Tourism Driven Variant 3: Twin Hub Status Quo Real estate Vehicle and equipment hire Health and Dental Services Finance Printing, publishing and recorded media Builders supplies wholesaling Other 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 22 No. Source: McDermott Miller Estimates McDermott Miller Limited, December 212 Queenstown Lakes District Council AIII-Page 1
Figure AIII.2 below ranks industries in descending order of employment growth in Wanaka Ward under the Tourism Driven Variant 3: Twin Hub scenario and show growth under the Status Quo scenario for comparison. Figure AIII.2: Total Employment (including indirect and induced effects) Increase by Economic growth Scenarios and industry group in WANAKA Ward: Growth to 221 Restaurant and bars Accommodation Other personal and household good retailing Sport and recreation Personal and private household services & household employed staff Road transport Supermarkets, grocery stores and furniture, houseware appliances and recreational goods retailing Other business services Libraries, museum and the arts Industry Real estate Motor vehicle retailing and services Health and Dental Services Legal and accounting services Air transport, services to transport and storage Tourism Driven Variant 3: Twin Hub Finance Status Quo Specialized food and liquor retailing Construction trade services Ship, boat and other transport equipment manufacturing Vehicle and equipment hire Motion picture, radio and TV services Other 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 5 55 6 65 No. Source: McDermott Miller Estimates McDermott Miller Limited, December 212 Queenstown Lakes District Council AIII-Page 2
Annex IV Commercial/Industrial Land Requirements under the Economic Growth Scenarios Queenstown Lakes District Council McDermott Miller Limited,
ANNEX IV COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL LAND REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE ECONOMIC GROWTH SCENARIOS This Annex presents estimate of the future commercially zoned land required to support growth in land use/employment activities under the economic growth scenarios. Comparison of retail floorspace supportable with developers intentions under the economic growth scenarios Figures AIV.1 and AIV.2 correspond to Figures 4.12 and 4.13 respectively in Section 4.6.3 of the main report, but have tables attached to show the data. Figure AIV.1: Cumulative Demand for Retail Floorspace (incl cafes etc) under Economic Growth and Population-driven scenarios, compared with Developer s intended additions to Retail Supply: Wakatipu-Arrowtown Floor Area (sq m 's) 15 13 11 9 7 5 3 Tourism Driven Scenario 2 Tourism Driven Scenario 1 Status Quo Based on Stats NZ Medium Household Growth Cumulative New Retail Supply - Developers' Intentions 1-1 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 22 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 23 231 Tourism Driven Scenario 2 5.5 7.6 27.4 33. 38.7 45. 51.8 59.2 67.2 75.9 8.7 85.6 9.7 96.1 11.7 17.6 113.7 12. 126.7 133.6 Tourism Driven Scenario 1 5.5 7.6 17.2 2.6 24.1 27.8 31.7 35.8 4.1 44.7 47.1 49.6 52.1 54.8 57.5 6.2 63.1 66. 69. 72.1 Status Quo 5.5 7.6 9.5 11.5 13.5 15.6 17.7 19.9 22.2 24.5 25.7 26.9 28.2 29.4 3.7 32. 33.4 34.7 36.1 37.5 Based on Stats NZ Medium Household Growth. 2.8 9.6 12.1 14.6 17.1 21.2 23.9 26.7 29.6 31.7 33.9 36.1 38.4 4.9 43.3 45.7 48.3 5.9 53.7 Cumulative New Retail Supply - Developers' Intentions. 6.1 1.4 44.4 56.4 68. 68. 68. 68. 68. 92.7 92.7 92.7 92.7 92.7 92.7 92.7 92.7 92.7 92.7 Year Source: McDermott Miller Estimates McDermott Miller Limited, December 212 Queenstown Lakes District Council AIV-Page 1
Figure AIV.2: Cumulative Demand for Retail Floorspace (incl cafes etc) under Economic Growth and Population-driven scenarios, compared with Developer s intended additions to Retail Supply: Wanaka 4 Floor Area (sq m 's) 35 3 25 2 15 1 Tourism Driven Scenario 3: Twin Hub Status Quo Based on Stats NZ Medium Household Growth Cumulative New Retail Supply - Developers' Intentions 5 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 22 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 23 231 Tourism Driven Scenario 3: Twin Hub 2.8 3.4 7.6 8.7 1.8 12.3 14.5 16.3 18.2 2.4 21.5 22.7 23.9 25.2 26.6 28. 29.4 31. 32.5 34.2 Status Quo 2.8 3.4 3.9 4.5 5. 5.6 6.2 6.8 7.4 8. 8.4 8.7 9.1 9.4 9.8 1.1 1.5 1.9 11.2 11.6 Based on Stats NZ Medium Household Growth. 1. 4.1 4.9 6.1 7. 7.9 8.8 9.8 1.7 12.4 13.3 14.1 15. 15.7 16.6 17.5 18.5 19.5 2.1 Cumulative New Retail Supply - Developers' Intentions.. 1. 1. 1. 13.2 13.2 16.4 16.4 16.4 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 32.7 32.7 32.7 32.7 32.7 Year Source: McDermott Miller Estimates McDermott Miller Limited, December 212 Land Use/Employment Activity Definitions This commercial land needs sections of this report are designed to update the estimates presented in the Commercial Land Needs Queenstown Lakes District report (Hill Young Cooper Limited, August 26). For that reason we have adopted the term employment centres for commercial zones as used in that report and defined them similarly, with additions), and adopted the employment activity definitions set out in Appendix 4 to that report. Yard-based Transport-related Manufacturing-Construction Wholesale Office Community Queenstown Lakes District Council AIV-Page 2
Wakatipu-Arrowtown Figures AIV.3 and AIV.4 correspond to Figures 4.14 and 4.15 respectively in Section 4.7.2 of the main report, but have tables attached to show the data. Figure AIV.3: Demand Scenarios for Vacant Commercial Land (Excluding Land Committed to Retailing): Wakatipu-Arrowtown Vaca nt land Land Area (ha) 12 11 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Tourism Driven Scenario 2 Tourism Driven Scenario 1 Based on Building Consents Trend Based on QLD Growth Projections 211 Status Quo Based on Stats NZ Medium Population Growth Tourism Driven Scenario 2 1.92 19.89 24.94 3.16 35.8 41.89 48.47 55.59 63.29 67.46 71.8 76.32 81.2 85.93 91.3 96.36 11.9 17.7 113.7 Tourism Driven Scenario 1 1.92 1.64 13.82 17.4 2.42 23.99 27.74 31.7 35.86 38.5 4.3 42.62 44.99 47.43 49.93 52.5 55.14 57.85 6.63 Based on Building Consents Trend 2.37 4.74 7.1 9.47 11.84 14.21 16.58 18.95 21.31 23.68 26.5 28.42 3.79 33.16 35.52 37.89 4.26 42.63 45 Based on QLD Growth Projections 211 1.43 2.86 4.29 5.72 7.83 9.93 12.4 14.15 16.26 18.18 2.1 22.3 23.95 25.87 28.27 3.66 33.6 35.46 37.85 Status Quo 1.92 3.77 5.65 7.53 9.46 11.46 13.52 15.65 17.84 18.98 2.13 21.3 22.49 23.7 24.93 26.18 27.45 28.74 3.5 Based on Stats NZ M edium Population Growth 1.43 2.87 4.3 5.73 7.24 8.74 1.24 11.74 13.25 14.42 15.6 16.78 17.96 19.14 2.71 22.28 23.85 25.42 27 Source: McDermott Miller Estimates McDermott Miller Limited, December 212 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 22 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 23 231 Year Queenstown Lakes District Council AIV-Page 3
Figure AIV.4: Demand Scenarios for Vacant Commercial Land (Excluding Land Committed to Retailing): Wakatipu-Arrowtown, Growth to 221 Land Area (ha) 7 65 6 55 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Status Quo Tourism Driven Scenario 1 Tourism Driven Scenario 2 Community Yard-based Transport-related Wholesale Manuf-Const Office Based on Stats NZ M edium Population Growth Based on QLD Growth Projections 211 Based on Building Consents Trend Community 2.15 4.36 7.78 1.8 2.21 4.41 Yard-based 6.87 13.64 23.66 5.5 6.75 2.49 Transport-related 7.36 14.95 26.76 1.79 2.19 2.62 Wholesale.26.52.9.62.76 1.25 M anuf-const.57 1.14 1.98 2.72 3.34 5.71 Office.63 1.26 2.21.81 1 4.83 Scenario Source: McDermott Miller Estimates McDermott Miller Limited, December 212 Queenstown Lakes District Council AIV-Page 4
Figures AIV.5 to AIV.8 compare the land required for the landuse/employment activities in Wakatipu-Arrowtown under the economic growth scenarios with current supply of vacant land (less land committed to retail): Under the Status Quo scenario (Figure AIV.5) by 216 some 7.53 ha will be required, by 221 17.8 ha will be required and by 231 some 3 ha will be required (all from 212 base). Even in 231 this is well short of the current supply of 41.1 ha (refer Table 3.3 in Section 3). Figure AIV.5: Demand for Commercial Land in WAKATIPU-ARROWTOWN: Status Quo Economic growth Scenario 5 Vacant land less land committed to retail Land Area (Ha). 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Community Yard-based Transport-related Wholesale Manufacturing- Construction Office 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 22 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 23 231 Communit y.23.46.68.91 1.14 1.38 1.63 1.89 2.15 2.29 2.43 2.57 2.71 2.86 3.1 3.16 3.31 3.47 3.62 Yard-based.73 1.45 2.17 2.89 3.64 4.41 5.2 6.2 6.87 7.31 7.75 8.2 8.66 9.13 9.61 1.9 1.58 11.8 11.58 Transport -relat ed.8 1.57 2.34 3.11 3.91 4.73 5.58 6.46 7.36 7.83 8.31 8.79 9.28 9.78 1.28 1.8 11.32 11.85 12.39 Wholesale.3.5.8.11.14.17.2.23.26.27.29.31.32.34.36.38.4.42.43 Manuf act uring-const ruct ion.6.12.18.24.3.37.43.5.57.61.64.68.72.76.8.84.88.92.96 Of f ice.7.13.2.26.33.4.47.55.63.67.71.75.79.83.88.92.96 1.1 1.6 Source: McDermott Miller Estimates Year Note: Land required for accommodation is excluded, as the District Plans provides for this outside town centre, business and industrial zones. Land required for retailing is excluded as land is committed to retailing in the District Plan and Plan Changes 34 and 19 and their associated Structure Plans. Most of this land will be taken up by the Five Mile Centre (including possible future expansion onto Area C1 of the Plan Change 19 land and proposed Remarkables Park retail developments. McDermott Miller Limited, December 212 Queenstown Lakes District Council AIV-Page 5
Under the Tourism Driven Variant 1 scenario (Figure AIV.6) by 216 some 17 ha will be required, by 221 36 ha will be required and by 61 some ha will be required (all from 212 base). Under this scenario further commercially zoned land would be required by 225. Figure AIV.6: Demand for Commercial Land in WAKATIPU-ARROWTOWN: Tourism Driven Variant 1 Vacant land less land committed to retail Land Area (ha.) 65 6 55 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Community Yard-based Transport-related Wholesale Manufacturing-Construction Office 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 22 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 23 231 Communit y.23 1.27 1.66 2.6 2.47 2.91 3.37 3.85 4.36 4.63 4.91 5.19 5.48 5.78 6.9 6.4 6.73 7.6 7.4 Yard-based.73 4.14 5.34 6.55 7.83 9.17 1.59 12.7 13.64 14.46 15.3 16.17 17.6 17.98 18.91 19.88 2.86 21.88 22.92 Transport -relat ed.8 4.35 5.69 7.4 8.46 9.96 11.54 13.2 14.95 15.88 16.83 17.8 18.8 19.83 2.88 21.97 23.8 24.23 25.4 Wholesale.3.15.2.25.29.35.4.46.52.55.58.61.65.68.72.75.79.83.87 Manuf act uring-const ruct ion.6.34.44.55.65.76.88 1.1 1.14 1.21 1.28 1.35 1.42 1.5 1.58 1.66 1.74 1.83 1.91 Of f ice.7.38.49.6.72.84.97 1.11 1.26 1.33 1.41 1.49 1.58 1.66 1.75 1.84 1.93 2.2 2.12 Source: McDermott Miller Estimates Refer footnotes to Figure AIV.5 McDermott Miller Limited, December 212 Year Queenstown Lakes District Council AIV-Page 6
Under the Tourism Driven Variant 2 scenario (Figure AIV.7) by 216 some 3 ha will be required, by 221 63 ha will be required and by 231 some 114 ha will be required (all from 212 base). Under this scenario further commercially zoned land would be required by 22. Figure AIV.7: Demand for Commercial Land in WAKATIPU-ARROWTOWN: Tourism Driven Variant 2 Vacant land less land committed to retail 12 11 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Community Yard-based Transport-related Wholesale Manufacturing-C onstruction Office 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 22 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 23 231 Community.23 2.41 3.4 3.68 4.38 5.13 5.95 6.83 7.78 8.3 8.84 9.4 9.99 1.6 11.2 11.9 12.6 13.3 14.1 Yard-based.73 7.59 9.47 11.4 13.5 15.8 18.2 2.8 23.7 25.2 26.8 28.5 3.2 32 33.9 35.8 37.9 4 42.2 Transport-related.8 8.27 1.4 12.6 15 17.6 2.4 23.5 26.8 28.5 3.4 32.3 34.4 36.5 38.6 4.9 43.3 45.8 48.4 Wholesale.3.29.36.43.51.6.69.79.9.96 1.2 1.9 1.15 1.22 1.3 1.37 1.45 1.53 1.62 Manufacturing-Construction.6.63.79.95 1.13 1.32 1.52 1.74 1.98 2.11 2.24 2.38 2.53 2.68 2.84 3 3.17 3.35 3.53 Office.7.7.87 1.6 1.25 1.46 1.69 1.94 2.21 2.35 2.5 2.66 2.82 2.99 3.17 3.36 3.55 3.75 3.96 Source: McDermott Miller Estimates Refer footnotes to Figure AIV.5 McDermott Miller Limited, December 212 Year Queenstown Lakes District Council AIV-Page 7
Wanaka Figures AIV.9 and AIV.1 correspond to Figures 4.16 and 4.17 respectively in Section 4.7.1 of the main report, but have tables attached to show the data. Figure AIV.9: Demand Scenarios for Vacant Commercial Land (Excluding Land Committed to Retailing) - Wanaka Vacant land less land committed to retail Land Area (ha) 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 Tourism Driven Scenario 3: Twin Hub Based on Building Consents Trend Status Quo Based on QLD Growth Projections 211 Based on Stats NZ Medium Population Growth 5 21 2 21 3 21 4 21 5 21 6 21 7 21 8 21 9 22 22 1 22 2 22 3 22 4 22 5 22 6 22 7 22 8 22 9 23 23 1 Tourism Driv en Scenario 3: Twin Hub.42 4.39 5.49 7.6 8.43 1.1 11.7 13.5 15.4 16.4 17.5 18.6 19.8 21 22.3 23.6 25 26.4 28 Based on Building Consents Trend 1.49 2.98 4.47 5.96 7.46 8.95 1.4 11.9 13.4 14.9 16.4 17.9 19.4 2.9 22.4 23.9 25.4 26.8 28.3 Status Quo.42.83 1.25 1.66 2.9 2.54 2.99 3.46 3.95 4.2 4.46 4.72 4.98 5.25 5.52 5.8 6.8 6.37 6.66 Based on QLD Growth Projections 211.58 1.15 1.73 2.3 2.94 3.59 4.23 4.87 5.51 6.9 6.66 7.23 7.81 8.38 9.4 9.7 1.4 11 11.7 Based on Stats NZ Medium Population Growth.59 1.18 1.76 2.35 2.99 3.63 4.26 4.9 5.53 6.8 6.63 7.18 7.73 8.28 8.98 9.67 1.4 11.1 11.8 Source: McDermott Miller Estimates McDermott Miller Limited, December 212 Year Queenstown Lakes District Council AIV-Page 8
Figure AIV.1: Demand Scenarios for Vacant Commercial Land (Excluding Land Committed to Retailing) Wanaka, Growth to 221 Land Area (ha) 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Status Quo Tourism Driven Scenario 3: Twin Hub Community Yard-based Transport-related Wholesale Manuf-Const Office Based on Stats NZ M edium Population Growth Based on QLD Growth Projections 211 Based on Building Consents Trend Community.54 2.11.67.66 2.22 Yard-based 1.55 5.9 2.49 2.48 2.3 Transport-related 1.35 5.33.36.36 3.67 Wholesale.11.42.24.24 1.15 M anuf-const.22.88 1.49 1.49 3.47 Office.19.75.28.28.61 Scenario Source: McDermott Miller Estimates McDermott Miller Limited, December 212 Queenstown Lakes District Council AIV-Page 9
Figures AIV.11 and AIV.12 compare the land required for the land-use/employment activities in Wanaka ward under the economic growth scenarios with current supply of vacant land (less land committed to retail) Under the Status Quo scenario (Figure AIV.11) by 216 some 1.7 ha will be required, by 221 3.9 ha will be required and by 231 some 3.7 ha will be required (all from 212 base). Even in 231 this is well short of the current supply of 38.7 ha (refer Table 3.3 in Section 3). Figure AIV.11: Demand for Commercial Land in WANAKA: Status Quo Economic growth Scenario Vacant land less committed to retail Land Area (ha.) 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Community Yard-based Transport-related Wholesale Manufacturing-C onstruction Office 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 22 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 23 231 Communit y.6.11.17.23.28.34.41.47.54.57.6.64.68.71.75.79.83.86.9 Yard-based.17.32.49.65.82.99 1.17 1.35 1.55 1.64 1.74 1.85 1.95 2.5 2.16 2.27 2.38 2.49 2.61 Transport -relat ed.15.29.43.57.71.87 1.2 1.18 1.35 1.43 1.52 1.61 1.7 1.79 1.88 1.98 2.7 2.17 2.27 Wholesale.1.2.3.5.6.7.8.9.11.11.12.13.14.14.15.16.17.17.18 Manuf act uring-const ruct ion.2.5.7.9.12.14.17.2.22.24.25.27.28.3.31.33.34.36.38 Of f ice.2.4.6.8.1.12.14.17.19.2.22.23.24.25.27.28.29.31.32 Year Source: McDermott Miller Estimates McDermott Miller Limited, December 212 Queenstown Lakes District Council AIV-Page 1
Under the Tourism Driven Variant 3 scenario (Figure AIV.12) by 216 some 6.6 ha will be required, by 221 13.8 ha will be required and by 231 some 25 ha will be required (all from 212 base). Under this scenario further commercially zoned land would also not be required under the 231. A caveat on this assessment is that if a driver of Wanaka employment growth that is a base industry unrelated to tourism vacant supply of 38.7 ha could be reached prior to the 231 horizon. Figure AIV.12: Demand for Commercial Land in WANAKA: Tourism Driven Variant 3 Vacant land less committed to retail Land Area (ha.) 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Community Yard-based Transport-related Wholesale Manufacturing-C onstruction Office 21 2 Community.1.6.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.9 Yard-based.2 1.7 2.1 2.7 3.3 3.9 4.5 5.2 5.9 6.3 6.7 7.1 7.6 8 8.5 9 9.5 1 11 Transport-related.2 1.5 1.9 2.4 2.9 3.5 4.1 4.7 5.3 5.7 6.1 6.5 6.9 7.3 7.7 8.2 8.7 9.2 9.7 Wholesale.1.2.2.2.3.3.4.4.5.5.5.5.6.6.6.7.7.8 Manufacturing-Construction.3.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.9 1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 Office.2.3.3.4.5.6.7.8.8.9.9 1 1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 Source: McDermott Miller Estimates 21 3 21 4 McDermott Miller Limited, December 212 21 5 21 6 21 7 21 8 21 9 22 22 1 22 2 Year 22 3 22 4 22 5 22 6 22 7 22 8 22 9 23 23 1 Queenstown Lakes District Council AIV-Page 11
Annex V Area Unit Maps Queenstown Lakes District Council
ANNEX V AREA UNIT MAPS Figure AV.1: Wakatipu Area Units (211 Definition) and Queenstown Lake District Zones Source: Queenstown Lakes District Council Queenstown Lakes District Council AV-Page 1
Figure AV.2: Queenstown Area Units (211 Definition) and Queenstown Lake District Zones Source: Queenstown Lakes District Council Queenstown Lakes District Council AV-Page 2
Figure AV.3: Wanaka Area Units (211 Definition) and Queenstown Lake District Zones Source: Queenstown Lakes District Council Queenstown Lakes District Council AV-Page 3
Queenstown Lakes District Council