CEE Quick Overview of Aircraft Classifications. January 2018

Similar documents
CEE 5614 and CEE Aircraft Classifications. Spring 2013

Aircraft Classifications. Dr. Antonio Trani and Julio Roa Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.

Analysis of Air Transportation Systems. The Aircraft and the System

Airfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni

Airfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni

The offers operators increased capacity while taking advantage of existing airport infrastructure. aero quarterly qtr_03 10

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW

Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Spring 2015 Blacksburg, Virginia

Wake Turbulence Standards

Meeting Summary ABE Master Plan Project Advisory Group (PAG) Meeting #3 August 15, Shannon Eibert, C&S Companies

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport

Demand Patterns; Geometric Design of Airfield Prof. Amedeo Odoni

FOR. Boeing Commercial Airplanes

Wake Turbulence Recategorization (RECAT) ATC Human Factors Issues During Implementation. Terminal Services

Airport Geometric Design Standards

PROPOSED HORIZONTAL LAYOUT FILLET DESIGN FOR ENTRANCE/EXIT TAXIWAYS

Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016

Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. January 27, 2009 Blacksburg, Virginia

ASSEMBLY 37TH SESSION

Airport Compatibility

Assignment 7: Airport Geometric Design Standards

FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT

Airport Runway Location and Orientation. CEE 4674 Airport Planning and Design

Assignment 10: Final Project

Technical Memorandum. Synopsis. Steve Carrillo, PE. Bryan Oscarson/Carmen Au Lindgren, PE. April 3, 2018 (Revised)

Chapter 5 Facility Requirements

Facility Requirements

Boeing Airplane Overview

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS CHAPTER

STUDY WORK GROUP MEETING No. 3. November 29, 2016

Assignment 2: Runway Length Analysis

Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update. Ultimate Operations 5th Working Group Briefing 9/25/18

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Chapter 5 Facility Requirements

CHAPTER 3. Airside Facilities

Comparative wake-turbulence assessments and findings for the B747-8

Table of Contents Facility Requirements Overview Airport Capacity and Delay Analysis... 1

Airport Compatibility Brochure 737 MAX

Assignment 3: Runway Length and EMAS Design. Aircraft Engine Remarks. CFM56-7B20/-7B22/-7B24 developing 20,000 lb of thrust at sea level

APPENDIX D MSP Airfield Simulation Analysis

Study Committee Meeting. September 2015

4.0 AIRFIELD CAPACITY & FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

executive summary The global commercial aircraft fleet in service is expected to increase by 80% to 45,600 aircraft in 2033 including 37,900

Facility Requirements

01/2016. Main airlines traffic 2015 (1) RPK* (millions) /14 (% ) 1st quarter 16/15 (% ) Airlines

SAFE WINGS. This issue WAKE-UP TO WAKE TURBULENCE. * For Internal Circulation Only

! Figure 1. Proposed Cargo Ramp at the end of Taxiway Echo.! Assignment 7: Airport Capacity and Geometric Design. Problem 1

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport

Boeing Aircraft and the Impact on Airports

3.1 Facility Requirements Overview Airfield Facility Requirements... 1

NEW GENERATION AIRCRAFT

Appendix A - Glossary

Public Information Meeting. September 2015

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

5. Facility Requirements

Airport Master Plan Open House Front Range Airport February 23, 2017

Historical Perspective

Assignment 6: ETOPS Operations and ATC

3.0 Facility Requirements

Quiz 2 - Solution. Problem #1 (50 points) CEE 5614 Fall Date Due: Wednesday November 20, 2013 Instructor: Trani

Key Purpose & Need Issues

Advisory Circular (AC)

Chapter 4: Facility Requirements

Cargo Aircraft Specifications

Wake Turbulence Evolution in the United States

Lessons Learnt From The EUROCONTROL Wake Impact Severity Assessment Flight Simulator Campaign

Draft Proposal for the Amendment of the Sub-Cap on Off-Peak Landing & Take Off Charges at Dublin Airport. Addendum to Commission Paper CP4/2003

Chapter 4 Airport Capacity Assessment and Identification of Facility Needs

Worst-case analysis of wake vortex induced risk of 700ft vertical separation. Gerben van Baren

trends bulletin

TABLE OF CONTENTS. General Study Objectives Public Involvement Issues to Be Resolved

MRJ Next Generation Regional Jet

Appendix 5 Supplemental Noise and Aircraft Substitution

2. CANCELLATION. AC 90-23F, Aircraft Wake Turbulence, dated February 20, 2002, is canceled.

FAA RECAT Phase I Operational Experience

ACAS on VLJs and LJs Assessment of safety Level (AVAL) Outcomes of the AVAL study (presented by Thierry Arino, Egis Avia)

Time-Space Analysis Airport Runway Capacity. Dr. Antonio A. Trani. Fall 2017

Outmaneuvered AIRFLOW

DRAFT FINAL REPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN. Rifle Garfield County Airport Revised May 15, 2014

Business Jet Traveler s. 5th Annual Readers Choice Survey AIN Publications. All Rights Reserved. For reprints, go to bjtonline.com/reprints.

EUROCAE ED-250: ROAAS MOPS

Community Noise Monitoring Saffron Walden John Campbell Campbell Associates Ltd

CEE 4674 Airport Planning and Design. Antonio A. Trani Julio Roa. Punta Cana Ecological Foundation Summer I, 2013

Planning Horizon Activity Levels Airfield Capacity and Delay Airport Physical Planning Criteria Airfield and Landside Facility Requirements

The Noise & Environmental office reviews airline schedules and night-time performance of the airlines operating at the Airport.

Airport Compatibility Brochure 737 MAX. March 2014 PRELIMINARY

JUNEAU RUNWAY INCURSION MITIGATION (RIM) PROGRAM JANUARY 25, 2017

Chapter 4 Facility Requirements

Chapter Two FORECAST OF AVIATION DEMAND A. DESCRIPTION OF FORECAST ELEMENTS

Boeing Product Update

Airfield Capacity Prof. Amedeo Odoni

Agenda: SASP SAC Meeting 3

Capacity Analysis & Facility Requirements

RSAT RUNUP ANALYSIS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. METHODOLOGY

AIRPORT MASTER PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING #2 AGENDA

Community Noise Monitoring Wareside John Campbell Campbell Associates Ltd

C > Capacity Analysis and Facility Requirements

PLU Airport Master Plan. Master Plan Advisory Committee (MPAC) Meeting #4 March 19, 2018

Airport Design-3 Geometric Design

Transcription:

CEE 5614 Quick Overview of Aircraft Classifications Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor Civil and Environmental Engineering January 2018 1

Material Presented The aircraft and its impact operations in the NAS Aircraft classifications Explain the impact of aircraft classifications and their effect in aviation operations 2

Relevance of Aircraft Characteristics Aircraft classifications are necessary in airport and airspace operations Most of the airport design standards are related to aircraft size (i.e., wingspan, aircraft length, aircraft wheelbase, aircraft seating capacity, etc.) Many of the same standards apply to the modeling and simulation of aviation operations The Next Generation (NextGen) air transportation system will cater to a more diverse pool of aircraft 3

Aircraft Performance in Aviation Operations Important to know the performance aspects of the aircraft on the ground and in the air to model aviation operations source: A. A. Trani source: Eurocontrol Aircraft Performance database source: https://contentzone.eurocontrol.int/aircraftperformance/details.aspx? ICAO=B738&NameFilter=737 4

Aircraft Performance in Aviation Operations The turbo-prop aircraft shown to the right shows significant performance differences with the Boeing 737-800 presented in the previous slide source: A. A. Trani source: Eurocontrol Aircraft Performance database source:https://contentzone.eurocontrol.int/aircraftperformance/details.aspx? ICAO=DH8C&GroupFilter=9 5

Geometric Design Classification (ICAO) 6

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Design Criteria Planning airport operations requires information of various aircraft features The FAA considers three important features of every aircraft: Aircraft Approach Category (AAC) Airplane Design Group (ADG) Taxiway Design Group (TDG) The following slides provide some guidance in how to find these three attributes for each aircraft 7

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Aircraft Design Group (ADG) Classification Design Group Tail Height (Feet) Wingspan (feet) I <20 <49 II 20 to <30 49 to < 79 III 30 to <45 79 to < 118 IV 45 to < 60 118 to < 171 V 60 to < 66 171 to < 214 Representative Aircraft Types Cessna 172, Beech 36, Cessna 421, Learjet 35 Beech B300, Cessna 550 Falcon 50, Challenger 605 Boeing 737, Airbus A320 CRJ-900, EMB-190 Boeing 767, Boeing 757, Airbus A300, Douglas DC-10 Boeing 747, Airbus A340, Boeing 777 VI 66 to <80 214 to < 262 Airbus A380, Antonov 124* * The Antonov 225 has a wingspan of 290 feet (in a class by itself). Only one aircraft produced. 8

FAA Aircraft Approach Speed Classification (AAC) Note: Approach speed varies with aircraft mass 9

Example of Aircraft Approach Speed Variations Consider the Airbus A340-500 - a long-range aircraft Approach Speed (knots) Max. Allowable Landing Weight 300,000 kg Approach speed at 180,000 kg landing mass ~ 125 knots Approach speed at 300,000 kg landing mass (maximum allowable landing mass) ~ 160 knots source: Airbus A340-500 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning 10

Source to Find Aircraft Approach Speed and Aircraft Mass (weight) Data FAA Advisory Circular AC/150 5300-13 Airport Design (Appendix 1) 11

Presentation of Aircraft Characteristics in Appendix 1 of AC 150/5300-13 Aircraft Approach Class Aircraft Design Group Taxiway Design Group 12

Taxiway Design Group (TDG) Previous FAA guidance considered tail height and wingspan as design factors for geometric design New guidance (Sep. 2012) Dimensions of the aircraft undercarriage are also important in geometric design New guidance for taxiway design considers Main gear Width (MGW) and Cockpit to Main gear Dimensions (CMG) 13

FAA AC 150/5300-13 Appendix 1 source: FAA AC 150/5300-13 14

Consideration About CMG Distance vs Wheelbase Distance FAA specifies: Cockpit to Main Gear (CMG) dimension will be used instead of the aircraft wheelbase for aircraft where the cockpit is located forward of the nose gear (typically applies to commercial aircraft) For aircraft with the cockpit located aft of the nose gear, use the wheelbase instead of CMG to determine the Taxiway Design Group (TDG) See figures in previous slides 15

Examples - Commercial Aircraft Most commercial aircraft have the cockpit located ahead of the nose gear (use CMG distance) Boeing 737-300. Twin-engine turbofan powered, commercial aircraft Cockpit to Main Gear Distance (CMG) 16

Taxiway Design Group Definitions source: FAA AC 150/5300-13 17

Runway Design Code (RDC) Three parameters are combined to derive a socalled Runway Design Code (RDC) AAC, ADG and Approach Visibility Minimums RDC provides three parameters needed to determine certain design standards that apply at the airport Note: for some airport design projects the TDG parameters is also critical to determine taxiwayto-runway distances 18

Approach Visibility Minimums Defined by a parameter called Runway Visual Range (RVR) RVR is the range over which the Pilot of an aircraft on the centre line of a runway can see the runway surface markings or the lights delineating the runway or identifying its centre line. (ICAO) RVR is normally expressed in feet or in meters 19

Approach Visibility Minimums Instrument Landing System Categories Category Decision Height (ft) RVR (ft) I 200 2,400 II 100 1,600 IIIa 50-100 1,200 IIIb 0-50 600 IIIc 0-50 0 source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjicabr4r3e 20

Aircraft Characteristic Databases FAA site http://www.faa.gov/airports/engineering/ aircraft_char_database/ Excel file with aircraft data (http://128.173.204.63/courses/ cee4674/cee4674_pub/aircraft_char_122009.xls) or at http://www.faa.gov/airports/engineering/ aircraft_char_database/) Eurocontrol site http://elearning.ians.lu/aircraftperformance/ 21

Sample Excel Database of Aircraft Characteristics Available at: Excel file with aircraft data (http://128.173.204.63/courses/cee4674/ cee4674_pub/aircraft_char_122009.xls) or at http://www.faa.gov/airports/engineering/aircraft_char_database/) ARC = Airport Reference Code combines AAC and ADG 22

Example Problem # 1 An airport is to be designed to accommodate the Boeing 757-300 aircraft. Determine the airport reference code and the taxiway design group to be used. Solution: Look at the FAA aircraft database: Approach speed is 142 knots (AAC = D) and Wingspan is 124.8 feet and tail height 44.5 feet (thus group IV) 23

Picture the Aircraft in Question (Sanity Check) Boeing 757-300 taking off at Punta Cana international Airport (A. Trani) Aircraft pictures are available at: http://www.airliners.net 24

Example Problem # 1 Boeing 757-300 : Approach speed is 142 knots (AAC = D) and Wingspan is 124.8 feet and tail height 44.5 feet (belongs to group IV) Boeing 757-300 Belongs to Group IV Reason: tail height falls into III group, wingspan belongs to group IV Use the most critical 25

Wake Vortex Every aircraft generates wakes behind the wing due to the strong circulation required to generate lift Circulation Strength Boundary Wake vortices depend on aircraft mass, wingspan and atmospheric conditions 26

Legacy FAA Wake Vortex Classification Superheavy 27

Wake Vortex Recategorization Classification FAA Introduced a new re-categorization procedure at Memphis International Airport in 2012 Consult FAA Order N JO 7110.608 28

New Wake Vortex Classification The new Re-Categorization (Phase 1) standards have been developed by FAA and ICAO Aircraft groups have changed! A = Superheavy aircraft, F = small aircraft Blank cells are either 3 nm or 2.5 nm depending on the airport 29

New Wake Vortex Classification (RECAT Phase 1) 30

New Wake Vortex Classification (RECAT Phase 1) RECAT Class Representative Aircraft Picture of Representative Aircraft A Airbus A380-800 B C Boeing 747-400, Boeing 777-300ER, Airbus A330-300, Airbus A350-900, Airbus A300-600, Boeing 787-8/9 McDonnell Douglas DC-10, Boeing MD-10, Boeing Douglas MD-11, Boeing 767-300 D Boeing 757-200 and -300, Boeing 737-800, Airbus A320, Airbus A321, McDonnell Douglas MD-80, Embraer 190, Bombardier CS-300, Gulfstream 550 and 650 E Bombardier CRJ-900, Embraer 170/175, Bombardier CRJ-700, Embraer 145, Bombardier CRJ-200, Dassault Falcon 7X F Cessna CitationJet 4, Gulfstream G280, Bombardier Challenger 350, Cessna 182, Cessna 172 31

Implications of Aircraft Wake Classes In-trail separations are driven by wake class groups Runway capacity today is usually driven by in-trail separations 32

Example # 2 Estimate the approximate arrival capacity to a single runway at La Guardia airport if 100% of the arrivals belong to the large wake class (now Category D under RECAT Phase 1) Assume the typical approach speed of arrivals is 140 knots from the final approach fix to the runway 2.5 nm + 20 second buffer Runway 04-22 at LGA 33

Example # 2 (cont.) A 2.5 nautical miles + 20 second buffer translates into a headway (i.e., time between successive arrivals) of : headway = 2.5nm 3600s / hr + 20s = 84.3s 140nm / hr The arrival capacity is the inverse of headway C arrivals = 3600s / hr 84.3s = 42 arrivals/hr 140 knots 140 knots 2.5 nm + 20 second buffer 34

International Air Transport Association (IATA) Classification Used in the forecast of aircraft movements at an airport based on the IATA forecast methodology 35

Other Classifications often mentioned in Aviation Trade Magazines Aircraft classification based on the aircraft use General aviation aircraft (GA) Corporate aircraft (CA) Commuter aircraft (COM) Transport aircraft (TA) Short-range Medium-range Long-range 36

General Aviation Aircraft 37

Corporate Aircraft 38

Commuter Aircraft 39

Short-Range Transport Aircraft 40

Medium-Range Transport Aircraft 41

Long-Range Transport Aircraft 42

Web Sites to Learn to Recognize Various Aircraft Pictures taken by the author at various airport (https://photos.app.goo.gl/ 8bdSvdwPQU7lHIDi2) Airliners site airliners.net Jetphotos (https://www.jetphotos.com) Eurontrol Aircraft Database (https://contentzone.eurocontrol.int/ aircraftperformance/default.aspx?) Aerospatiale ATR-42-500 Airbus A380-800 43

Aircraft Trends Very large capacity aircraft (introduced in the third quarter of 2007) Airbus A380 and Boeing 747-8 New generation ultra-efficient, long-range transport Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 New generation short range aircraft Bombardier C-Series, Mitsubishi Regional Jet (MRJ), Comac 919 and Irkut MC-21 44

Aircraft Wing Aspect Ratio (AR) S AR = b 2 / S AR b 2 wing aspect ratio (dimensionless) wingspan (ft 2 or m 2 ) b S wing area (ft 2 or m 2 ) 45

Evolution of Aircraft Wing Aspect Ratios Long range aircraft require very long and thin wings to be aerodynamically efficient Future aircraft designs 46

Evolution of Aircraft Mass and Wingspan 47