FOR. Boeing Commercial Airplanes

Similar documents
Airport Compatibility Brochure 737 MAX. March 2014 PRELIMINARY

CEE 5614 and CEE Aircraft Classifications. Spring 2013

Airport Compatibility Brochure 737 MAX

Aircraft Classifications. Dr. Antonio Trani and Julio Roa Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.

CEE Quick Overview of Aircraft Classifications. January 2018

Boeing Airplane Overview

Airfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni

Airfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni

717 Aeroplane JAA Data Sheet

Airport Compatibility

Analysis of Air Transportation Systems. The Aircraft and the System

The offers operators increased capacity while taking advantage of existing airport infrastructure. aero quarterly qtr_03 10

1.0 SCOPE AND INTRODUCTION. 1.1 Scope. 1.2 Introduction. 1.3 A Brief Description of the

Boeing Aircraft and the Impact on Airports

[Docket No. FAA ; Amendment Nos A, A] Aging Airplane Program: Widespread Fatigue Damage; Correction

7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement

AVIATION MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY

Significance of Modifications for Development of Passenger Airplanes

International Industry Working Group Fifth Edition R1, 2007

Cargo Aircraft Specifications

7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement

European Aviation Safety Agency

Chapter 14. Design of Flexible Airport Pavements AC 150/5320-6D

7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement

PROPOSED HORIZONTAL LAYOUT FILLET DESIGN FOR ENTRANCE/EXIT TAXIWAYS

Advisory Circular (AC)

Airport/Aircraft Compatibility Challenges on the Apron

Aircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach, M. Sadraey, Wiley, 2012 Chapter 12 Design of Control Surfaces. Tables

Boeing Product Update

Type Acceptance Report

Airport Compatibility

The Giant Jetliner A380

Draft Proposal for the Amendment of the Sub-Cap on Off-Peak Landing & Take Off Charges at Dublin Airport. Addendum to Commission Paper CP4/2003

The Development of Boeing s

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION TECHNICAL CENTRE, OPPOSITE SAFDRJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI

THE BOEING COMPANY

Tires Versus Pavement: Pilots, mechanics, and airport managers on the same page

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW

SECTION B AIRWORTHINESS CERTIFICATION

Detailed seat map United Airlines Boeing B (777) - version 4. Find the best airplanes seats, information on legroom, recline and in-flight

2.1 General Characteristics. 2.2 General Dimensions. 2.3 Ground Clearances. 2.4 Interior Arrangements. 2.5 Cabin Cross Sections

RUNWAY ARRESTING SYSTEMS

FINAL REPORT. AAIU Synoptic Report No: AAIU File No: 2004/0066 Published: 20/06/05

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-224-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

Demand Patterns; Geometric Design of Airfield Prof. Amedeo Odoni

Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016

LAX Community Noise Roundtable. FAA s Proposal of a Stage 5 Aircraft Noise Standard. March 9, 2016

ARCHIVED REPORT. Boeing MD-11 - Archived 4/2003

Type Acceptance Report

MRJ Next Generation Regional Jet

TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET A3WE

Type Acceptance Report

AIR ACTIVITIES BADGE AT THE YORKSHIRE AIR MUSEUM Stage 2

Aircraft Technology. Impact on Airport Capacity. Bob Kelley-Wickemeyer. Chief Engineer Boeing Enabling Technology & Research

FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR FLIGHT

Municipal Airport 1410 Arizona Place S.W. Orange City, IA

QTR_01. Take Our Readership Survey. See page 3. Building Better Communication. Advanced Ultrasonic Inspection. Preventing Loss of Control in Flight

Aircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach, M. Sadraey, Wiley, Chapter 7 Fuselage Design. Figures

Beyond Fuel Efficiency

Chapter 6 Fuselage and tail sizing (Lectures 23 to 30)

MEMORANDUM FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2014

Enhanced Time Based Separation (ETBS) & RECAT EU. Heathrow Crew Briefing

Page 1. Aircraft Weight & Balance Tool

TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

Assignment 3: Runway Length and EMAS Design. Aircraft Engine Remarks. CFM56-7B20/-7B22/-7B24 developing 20,000 lb of thrust at sea level

FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT

767 Airplane Characteristics for. Airport Planning. Boeing Commercial Airplanes. D SEPTEMBER 2005 i

Non-Group RVSM Certification Process. Anthony C. Wiederkehr FAA DER - Flight Analyst

737 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning

Wake Turbulence Recategorization (RECAT) ATC Human Factors Issues During Implementation. Terminal Services

TAKEOFF SAFETY ISSUE 2-11/2001. Flight Operations Support & Line Assistance

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-NM-003-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

Meeting Summary ABE Master Plan Project Advisory Group (PAG) Meeting #3 August 15, Shannon Eibert, C&S Companies

PUZZLES CONNECT-THE-DOTS. A Collection of. of Famous Aircraft

Wing Taper Ratio. Wing Incidence. Wing Incidence

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-NM-003-AD; Amendment

EASA Safety Information Bulletin

/300 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning

ANALYSIS OF FLIGHT PERFORMANCE AND STABILITY OF FAMILY OF TRANSPORT AIRPLANE DESIGNS WITH FUSELAGE COMMONALITIES

Fokker Technologies The Fokker mind, heart and soul

Components Forecast & Trends. Matthew T. Harman Analyst, Aerospace Industry MRO Arlington, VA

Continued Operational Safety Risk Assessment of Textron Aviation s Commercial Fleet. July 5, 2018

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET A2NM

Mountain / Canyon Flying LLC TAILWHEEL ENDORSEMENT SYLLABUS

Airport Master Plan. Brookings Regional Airport. Runway Runway 17-35

Policies for Certification, operation and maintenance of UAS Andres Eduardo Parra Catama Air Safety Inspector Civil Aviation Authority of Colombia

Chapter 5 Facility Requirements

BIRD STRIKES TO CIVIL HELICOPTERS IN THE UNITED STATES,

Cargo Certification Process

NOTE: DATA PRELIMINARY

Worldwide, the likelihood

Airport Design-3 Geometric Design

Type Acceptance Report

AIRCRAFT SPECIFICATION SUMMARY

Manufacturer s Perspective- Airport Pavement Needs and Maintenance Issues

Public Information Meeting. September 2015

ADAPTER CABLE P/N. Airbus 300/B2/B4 AC-2K C 7/24/02 ANY 290F F /1/74

! "#$ #%& Challenge the future. Delft University of Technology

Transcription:

Aircraft Classification & Airport Pavement Design Curves Prof. Dr. Shafik Jendia 2009/2010 1

A-1 BOEING 747-200 AIRPLANE CHARACTERSTICS FOR AIRPORT PLANNING & DESIGN BOEING Boeing Commercial Airplanes 2

GENERAL Manufacture Boeing Model 200 ICAO Code 4 E Approach Category (FAA) D Design Group (FAA) V Gear Configuration Double Duel Tandem Maximum Takeoff Weight 365.00 ton Maximum Landing Weight 256.00 ton BODY DIMENSIONS Wing Span 59.64 m Fuselage Length 70.66 m Tail Height 19.58 m LANDING GEAR Undercarriage 11.00 m Nose To Main Gear 25.62 m Turning Radius 48.90 m REFERENCE FIELD LENGTH Takeoff Length 3,000 m Landing Length 2,300 m 3

A-2 BOEING 727-200 AIRPLANE CHARACTERSTICS FOR AIRPORT PLANNING & DESIGN BOEING Boeing Commercial Airplanes 4

GENERAL Manufacture Boeing Model 200 ICAO Code 4 C Approach Category (FAA) C Design Group (FAA) III Gear Configuration Duel Maximum Takeoff Weight 95.10 ton Maximum Landing Weight 73.10 ton BODY DIMENSIONS Wing Span 32.92 m Fuselage Length 46.68 m Tail Height 10.65 m LANDING GEAR Undercarriage 5.72 m Nose To Main Gear 19.28 m Turning Radius 25.90 m REFERENCE FIELD LENGTH Takeoff Length 2,900 m Landing Length 1,500 m 5

A-3 BOEING 737-200 AIRPLANE CHARACTERSTICS FOR AIRPORT PLANNING & DESIGN BOEING Boeing Commercial Airplanes 6

GENERAL Manufacture Boeing Model 200 ICAO Code 4 C Approach Category (FAA) C Design Group (FAA) III Gear Configuration Duel Maximum Takeoff Weight 53.00 ton Maximum Landing Weight 47.00 ton BODY DIMENSIONS Wing Span 28.35 m Fuselage Length 30.58 m Tail Height 11.23 m LANDING GEAR Undercarriage 5.23 m Nose To Main Gear 11.38 m Turning Radius 18.70 m REFERENCE FIELD LENGTH Takeoff Length 2,000 m Landing Length 1,400 m 7

A-4 BOEING 757-200 AIRPLANE CHARACTERSTICS FOR AIRPORT PLANNING & DESIGN BOEING Boeing Commercial Airplanes 8

GENERAL Manufacture Boeing Model 200 ICAO Code 4 D Approach Category (FAA) C Design Group (FAA) IV Gear Configuration Duel Tandem Maximum Takeoff Weight 99.00 ton Maximum Landing Weight 89.00 ton BODY DIMENSIONS Wing Span 37.95 m Fuselage Length 47.32 m Tail Height 13.77 m LANDING GEAR Undercarriage 7.32 m Nose To Main Gear 18.29 m Turning Radius 29.87 m REFERENCE FIELD LENGTH Takeoff Length 2,050 m Landing Length 1,550 m 9

A-5 BOEING 767-200 AIRPLANE CHARACTERSTICS FOR AIRPORT PLANNING & DESIGN BOEING Boeing Commercial Airplanes 10

GENERAL Manufacture Boeing Model 200 ICAO Code 4 D Approach Category (FAA) C Design Group (FAA) IV Gear Configuration Duel Tandem Maximum Takeoff Weight 136.00 ton Maximum Landing Weight 122.00 ton BODY DIMENSIONS Wing Span 47.63 m Fuselage Length 48.51 m Tail Height 15.98 m LANDING GEAR Undercarriage 9.30 m Nose To Main Gear 19.69 m Turning Radius 35.66 m REFERENCE FIELD LENGTH Takeoff Length 2,150 m Landing Length 1,680 m 11

A-6 AIRBUS 300-B4 AIRPLANE CHARACTERSTICS FOR AIRPORT PLANNING & DESIGN AIRBUS Airbus Commercial Airplanes 12

GENERAL Manufacture Airbus Model 300-B4 ICAO Code 4 D Approach Category (FAA) C Design Group (FAA) IV Gear Configuration Duel Tandem Maximum Takeoff Weight 165.00 ton Maximum Landing Weight 134.00 ton BODY DIMENSIONS Wing Span 44.83 m Fuselage Length 53.61 m Tail Height 16.70 m LANDING GEAR Undercarriage 9.60 m Nose To Main Gear 18.60 m Turning Radius 38.79 m REFERENCE FIELD LENGTH Takeoff Length 2,850 m Landing Length 1,600 m 13

A-7 AIRBUS 310-200 AIRPLANE CHARACTERSTICS FOR AIRPORT PLANNING & DESIGN AIRBUS Airbus Commercial Airplanes 14

GENERAL Manufacture Airbus Model 310-200 ICAO Code 4 D Approach Category (FAA) C Design Group (FAA) III Gear Configuration Duel Tandum Maximum Takeoff Weight 132.00 ton Maximum Landing Weight 118.00 ton BODY DIMENSIONS Wing Span 43.90 m Fuselage Length 46.66 m Tail Height 15.94 m LANDING GEAR Undercarriage 9.60 m Nose To Main Gear 15.21 m Turning Radius 25.90 m REFERENCE FIELD LENGTH Takeoff Length 1,850 m Landing Length 1,650 m 15

A-8 Mc Donnel DOUGLAS DC-9 AIRPLANE CHARACTERSTICS FOR AIRPORT PLANNING & DESIGN 16

DOUGLAS Douglas Commercial Airplanes GENERAL Manufacture MC Douglas Model 9 series 15 ICAO Code 4 C Approach Category (FAA) C Design Group (FAA) III Gear Configuration Duel Maximum Takeoff Weight 41.30 ton Maximum Landing Weight 37.00 ton BODY DIMENSIONS Wing Span 27.25 m Fuselage Length 31.82 m Tail Height 8.41 m LANDING GEAR Undercarriage 5.00 m Nose To Main Gear 13.32 m Turning Radius 19.30 m REFERENCE FIELD LENGTH Takeoff Length 2,000 m Landing Length 1,500 m 17

A-9 FOKKER 27 MK 500 AIRPLANE CHARACTERSTICS FOR AIRPORT PLANNING & DESIGN FOKKER Fokker Commercial Airplanes 18

GENERAL Manufacture Fokker 27 Model MK 500 ICAO Code 3 C Approach Category (FAA) B Design Group (FAA) III Gear Configuration Duel Maximum Takeoff Weight 20.40 ton Maximum Landing Weight 19.00 ton BODY DIMENSIONS Wing Span 29.00 m Fuselage Length 25.06 m Tail Height 8.84 m LANDING GEAR Undercarriage 7.20 m Nose To Main Gear 9.74 m Turning Radius 18.60 m REFERENCE FIELD LENGTH Takeoff Length 1,670 m Landing Length 1,000 m 19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29