Submission of REPUBLICA ORIENTAL DEL URUGUAY. to the COMMISSION ON THE LIMITS OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF

Similar documents
PART 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. English Translation of the Russian Original

The Senate and the Chamber of Representatives of the Eastern Republic of Uruguay, meeting in general assembly, decree:

The following ministries, departments and agencies of the Government of the Solomon Islands involved in the preparation of the Submission:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Partial Amended Submission to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf in Respect of the North Area

UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY STUDY. SERIES A. LIMITS IN THE SEAS. NUM--ETC(UI UNCLASSIFI1ED EN~D

Washington College of Law Library. This Book Belonged to The Private Collection

Decrees, orders, circulars

Taken from UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Law on the boundaries of the maritime tract, 10 March 1993

Maritime Areas Act, 1983 (1)(Act No. 15 of 19 May 1983)

Marine Protection Rules Part 141 Ship Design, Construction, Equipment and Operation Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk

2. Dominican Republic

Official Gazette of the French Republic No of 1 November Text No. 6

Danube River Basin District

Application for a Research Cruise within Waters under Ireland s Jurisdiction

2012. Proceedings of the 11 European Geoparks Conference. AGA Associação Geoparque Arouca, Arouca, 5-6.

Report on Geographic Scope of Market-based Measures (MBMS)

Danube River Basin District

Cooperation Agreements for SAR Service and COSPAS-SARSAT SEARCH AND RESCUE AGREEMENTS: OVERVIEW. (Presented by United States)

Estuaries of South America

REGULATION No. 10/2011 ON APPROVAL OF FLIGHT PROCEDURES INCLUDING SID-s AND STAR-s. Article 1 Scope of Application

Annex 1 Baseline of the Territorial Sea of the Republic of Estonia. Continues along the low-water line of the sea coast to point 3.

WWNWS3/3/2-VI Meeting 3 17 August MSI Self Assessment NAVAREA VI SUMMARY

International Boundary Study. Tanzania Uganda Boundary

Overview ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices for Aerodrome Mapping Data reported to AIM

AERODROME LICENCE APPLICATION PROCESS

HELLENIC NAVY HYDROGRAPHIC SERVICE. XVI th MEDITERRANEAN AND BLACK SEAS HYDROGRAPHIC COMMISSION NATIONAL REPORT OF GREECE

STUDY GUIDE. The Land. Physical Features of Latin America. Chapter 8, Section 1. Terms to Know DRAWING FROM EXPERIENCE ORGANIZING YOUR THOUGHTS

ARTWEI ARTWEI ARTWEI

International Boundary Study

Land Figures & Spatial Data Infrastructure in KOSOVO

CHAPTER FISHERY LIMITS ORDINANCE and Subsidiary Legislation

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 3 October 2013 (OR. en) 13408/13 Interinstitutional File: 2013/0020 (NLE) TRANS 466 MAR 126

GEOPOLITICAL INDICATORS OF THE OCEANS. World Percentage Earth 29,6 Percentage oceans 36,2. 0,009 million km²

CROSS-BORDER TRADE IN SERVICES

This Book Belonged to. of Judge Richard R. Baxter. The Private Collection. THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY Washington College of Law Library.

NOTIFICATION OF PROPOSED RESEARCH CRUISE

EN Official Journal of the European Union. (Acts whose publication is obligatory)

Environmental Impact Assessment of the dredging operations and aids to navigation works in the Argentina s Santa Fe Confluencia waterway.

The Geological Pacific Northwest. Wednesday February 6, 2012 Pacific Northwest History Mr. Rice

Month June 2011 South America (except Colombia for HA) Date of submission 01/07/11 MONTHLY REPORT

Ecosystem context in the Environmental Impact Assessment of the Dredging Operations in the Argentina s Santa Fe

TREATY SERIES 2007 Nº 73

Introduction to the Data Catalogue

BARBADOS NATIONAL REPORT

The Antarctic Treaty System

2009 No ANTARCTICA. The Antarctic (Amendment) Regulations 2009

Objective. Students will familiarize themselves with the physical features and climates of Latin America.

ANNEX V. List of Abbreviations

PART 71. Designation Of Class A And C Airspace; Air Traffic Service Routes; Designation Of Airways; And Reporting Points

35. SUPPLEMENTARY BOUNDARY TREATY 1 BETWEEN ARGENTINA AND PARAGUAY, SIGNED AT BUENOS AIRES, JULY

Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and

Participant Presentations (Topics of Interest to the Meeting)

Rural Rustic Road Program

Infrastructure Report Uruguay 2014

Learning Objectives. By the end of this presentation you should understand:

Kermadec. Ocean Sanctuary

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

The Maltese Islands: Geography

ICES form - Notification of proposed research cruise

SITE ELEVATION AMSL...Ground Elevation in feet AMSL STRUCTURE HEIGHT...Height Above Ground Level OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL...Total Overall Height AMSL

21 WORLD CONGRESS OF SOIL SCIENCE Sunday 20 Friday 25 November 2016 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Questions and Answers Cape Town Agreement of 2012

Presentation. Feasibility of the Establishment of a Single Airspace within the Caribbean

MESO AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN SEA HYDROGRAPHIC COMMISSION 18 th Meeting Varadero, Cuba (27 November - 02 December 2017) NATIONAL REPORT BRAZIL

MESO AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN SEA HYDROGRAPHIC COMMISSION 15 th Meeting - Manzanillo, Mexico (10-13 December 2014) NATIONAL REPORT BRAZIL

DRAFT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR THE SAFETY OF AIR NAVIGATION (EUROCONTROL) AND THE KINGDOM OF MOROCCO

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Presented by Matti Amukwa Chairman Confederation of Namibian Fishing Associations November 2012

Order on the discharge of oil from ships in the exclusive economic zone around Greenland

47I THE LAS ANIMAS GLACIER.

GREATER GEELONG PLANNING SCHEME PROPOSED AMENDMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE HELICOPTER FLIGHTPATHS SERVING GEELONG HOSPITAL

Friday, November 10, 2017


AERONAUTICAL SERVICES ADVISORY MEMORANDUM (ASAM) Focal Point: Gen

4 Rights and duties in connection with the conduct of petroleum activities

Geographic Qualities of South America

PROSPECTING, EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION OF DEEP SENSITIZATION SEMINAR ON THE WORK OF THE PROVISIONAL AGENDA

IPA cross-border project BALMAS (Ballast water management system for Adriatic sea protection)

Brador hills biodiversity reserve

New Zealand Hydrographic Authority HYPLAN. Version April 2017

FRAMEWORK LAW ON THE PROTECTION AND RESCUE OF PEOPLE AND PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF NATURAL OR OTHER DISASTERS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

SHIP ACCIDENTS IN THE BALTIC SEA AREA

THE INTERNATIONAL GROWTH OF SPANISH HOLIDAY HOTEL CHAINS FROM A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE: A CASE STUDY

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISPUTE CONCERNING MARITIME DELIMITATION IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA AND THE PACIFIC OCEAN. COSTA RICA v.

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)

Cooperative Development of Operational Safety Continuing Airworthiness Programme. COSCAP-Gulf States. Training of Airworthiness Inspectors

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

Summary of Public Submissions Received on

ARGENTINA. Marine Rescue Co-ordination Centre: Bahía Blanca (PREFECTURA NAVAL) Region: III Position: 38 43'S 62 6'W

AIM WG: Contributing to ATM Success. Roland Baumann Head Planning & Development AIM skyguide

Consideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Dec. 10, Map of Convention Area Protocol to the London Convention

Gas y Petróleo del Neuquén S.A.

Order of the Minister of Environment #39, August 22, 2011 Tbilisi

REPORT BY THE NAVAL HYDROGRAPHIC SERVICE

Glacial Origins and Features of Long Island

Summary 2018/2 2 February Maritime Delimitation in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) and

The Aegean Maritime Disputes and International Law

Transcription:

Submission of REPUBLICA ORIENTAL DEL URUGUAY to the COMMISSION ON THE LIMITS OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF pursuant to provisions of article 76, paragraph 8, of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Advisory Commission of the Uruguayan Executive Power on the Delineation of the Outer Limit of the Continental Shelf (COALEP) Dr. Carlos Mata Prates; Chairman Ministry of Foreign Affairs RAdm. Manuel Burgos Uruguayan Navy; Ministry of Defence Capt. Julio Lamartheé Tajes Ministry of Foreign Affairs Mr. Daniel Montiel Directorate of Aquatic Resources; Ministry of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries Dr. Fernando Preciozzi Directorate of Mining and Geology; Ministry of Industry, Energy and Mining Dr. Héctor de Santa Ana Directorate of Fuels, Alcohol and Portland Cement Capt. Francisco Caamaño Uruguayan Navy; Ministry of Defence 1

2

CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 4 2. PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 76 INVOKED IN URUGUAY S SUBMISSION... 5 3. ABSENCE OF TERRITORIAL DISPUTES... 5 4. ASSISTANCE IN THE ELABORATION OF URUGUAY'S SUBMISSION... 5 5. STATE BODIES CONCERNED IN THE ELABORATION OF URUGUAY S SUBMISSION... 6 6. THE URUGUAYAN CONTINENTAL MARGIN - GENERAL FEATURES... 7 7. OUTER LIMIT OF URUGUAY'S CONTINENTAL SHELF... 9 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Uruguay s continental shelf... 4 Figure 2: Location, limits and morphological features of the Uruguayan continental margin... 7 Figure 3: Major geological features of Uruguay: areas of crystalline basement and of phanerozoic sedimentary basins... 8 Figure 4: Major structural features of the Uruguayan continental margin and adjacent areas... 8 Figure 5: Chart showing the two constraint lines (2,500 meter isobath + 100 M and the line at 350 M from the baselines), the outer edge of the continental margin, and the resulting line delineating the Outer Limit of Uruguay s Continental Shelf (350 M)... 9 3

1. INTRODUCTION Pursuant to provisions of article 76 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (hereinafter the Convention), and to article 4 of Annex II of same, República Oriental del Uruguay (Uruguay) hereby submits to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (the Commission) particulars on the outer limit of its continental shelf, extending beyond 200 nautical miles (M) from the baselines from which the breadth of territorial sea is measured. On December 10, 1982 Uruguay signed the Convention, which was subsequently approved by Uruguayan Law Nº 16,287, and ratified on December 10, 1992. Figure 1 shows the extent of Uruguay s Continental Shelf, particulars of which are herewith submitted to the Commission. Figure 1: Uruguay's continental shelf 4

2. PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 76 INVOKED IN URUGUAY S SUBMISSION The fixed points delimiting Uruguay s Continental Shelf are defined in this Submission. Such determinations were based on the following analysis: Determination of foot of slope (FOS) points in conformity with paragraph 4 (b) of article 76 of the Convention -i.e. those points at the base of the continental slope where the gradient change was found to be maximum. Delineation of the outer edge of the continental margin in conformity with the methodology set out in paragraph 4 (a) (ii) of article 76 of the Convention -i.e. FOS points + 60 M. Application of the constraint criterion provided for in paragraph 5 of article 76 - i.e. 350 M constraint line 3. ABSENCE OF TERRITORIAL DISPUTES There exist, at present, no unresolved disputes over the maritime border with either of Uruguay s neighbouring countries, Argentina or Brazil. 4. ASSISTANCE IN THE ELABORATION OF URUGUAY'S SUBMISSION Assistance in the elaboration of this Submission was received, in April 2008, from Dr. Galo Carrera, member of the Commission. Further assistance was also received from other, non-member consultants and institutions from Germany, Brazil, Portugal and Norway. 5

5. STATE BODIES CONCERNED IN THE ELABORATION OF URUGUAY S SUBMISSION Uruguay's Executive Power Resolution of August 20, 1996 created an Advisory Commission of the Uruguayan Executive Power on the Delineation of the Outer Limit of the Continental Shelf (COALEP). Thus deputed the task of delineating the outer limit of Uruguay s continental shelf beyond 200 M, the said Advisory Commission is integrated by the following state bodies: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Ministry of Defence (General Command of the Uruguayan Navy) Ministry of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries (Directorate of Aquatic Resources) Ministry of Industry, Energy and Mining (Directorate of Mining and Geology - Directorate of Fuels, Alcohol and Portland Cement) Uruguayan Law Nº 17,033 (Law of Maritime Territory), approved in 1998, adapted the Uruguayan legislation to the Convention s regulations, which entered into force in Uruguay in 1994. Under article 18 of the above-referred Law, the Uruguayan Navy was charged with conducting studies and works as required for determining the outer limit of Uruguay s continental shelf. To fulfil the provisions of said Law, the Uruguayan Navy created the Office for Coordination of the Continental Shelf Surveying Project (OCPLA). OCPLA has received technical assistance from various divisions of the Uruguayan Navy, as well as from other state bodies, including, among others, the following: Oceanography, Hydrography and Meteorology Service of the Uruguayan Navy Research Vessel ROU 22 Oyarvide Directorate of Mining and Geology of the Ministry of Industry, Energy and Mining Faculty of Science of Uruguay's State University (Universidad de la República) Directorate of Fuels, Alcohol and Portland Cement (ANCAP) 6

6. THE URUGUAYAN CONTINENTAL MARGIN - GENERAL FEATURES The Uruguayan continental margin comprises the area delimited approximately between latitude 33º S and 40º S and longitude 46º W and 56º W (Figure 2). The evolution and configuration of this margin was determined by tectonic, magmatic and sedimentary processes that have, ever since the Jurassic, governed the fragmentation of West Gondwanaland, and the subsequent appearance, opening and evolution of the Atlantic Ocean. Figure 2: Location, limits and morphological features of the Uruguayan continental margin Morphologically, the Uruguayan continental margin comprises a broad, well-defined continental shelf with particular features of the continental slope; namely, the transition from the continental slope to the abyssal plain is marked by the absence of a continental rise along the entire width of the Uruguayan continental margin. Geologically, the continental rupture, aperture and separation dynamics led to the development of a broad, divergent and segmented volcanic continental margin, where various sedimentary depocentres developed in the Meso-Cenozoic. These depocentres vary in thickness up to 12,000 meters and are displaced and separated by structural elements e.g. internal highs, fault systems. Among such depocentres, an aulacogenic structure oriented in the WNW-ESE direction comprises the Punta del Este Basin; to the North of which is the Pelotas Basin, and to the South-East of which - towards deeper regions- is the Eastern River Plate Basin (Figure 3). 7

Data concerning the stratigraphic and structural features of the sedimentary basins off the Uruguayan coast are the result of drilling and geophysical surveying for hydrocarbon reservoirs. In the light of data collected by COALEP, the continuity of sediments was confirmed beyond 350 M from the Uruguayan coastline, with thickness greater than 2,000 meters. Figure 3: Major geological features of Uruguay: areas of crystalline basement and of phanerozoic sedimentary basins The Punta del Este Basin is developed South of the Polonio High, to the North-East of which the Pelotas Basin stretches along the Brazilian shelf up to the Florianópolis High. As also found in vast areas of the South-Atlantic margin, the Uruguayan continental margin shows tectonic segmentation defined by the River Plate Transfer System, which is reflected in the seabed morphology both North and South of the above-described structural pattern (Figure 4). Figure 4: Major structural features of the Uruguayan continental margin and adjacent areas 8

7. OUTER LIMIT OF URUGUAY'S CONTINENTAL SHELF The outer edge of the continental margin is part of the basis for determining the Outer Limit of the Continental Shelf, pursuant to provisions of Art. 76. Therefore, four FOS points were selected between the Northern border, with Brazil, and the Southern border, with Argentina. The outer edge of the continental margin is generated by the above points, based on the Hedberg formula (FOS + 60 M). The outer edge of the Uruguayan continental margin is defined by a set of fixed points located on the envelope curve determined by arcs drawn at a 60 M distance from the selected FOS points. On drawing the constraint lines described in paragraph 5 of article 76, all abovereferred fixed points are found to lie beyond both such constraints (Figure 5). Thus, in conformity with provisions of paragraph 7 of article 76, the Outer Limit of Uruguay s Continental Shelf is delineated by straight lines of length not greater than 60 M joining 45 fixed points located at a 350 M distance from the respective baselines. Figure 5: Chart showing the two constraint lines (2,500 meter isobath + 100 M and the line at 350 M from the baselines), the outer edge of the continental margin, and the resulting line delineating the Outer Limit of Uruguay s Continental Shelf (350 M) 9

Geographic coordinates (Datum WGS 84) of fixed points delineating the Outer Limit of Uruguay's Continental Shelf FP Latitude º Longitude º Distance to previous Origin (South) (West) point (M) 01 39.4967987 50.0461657 0 350 M, see NOTE 02 39.4591817 49.9790067 4 350 M 03 39.4209373 49.9124201 4 350 M 04 39.3820697 49.8464153 4 350 M 05 39.3425828 49.7810015 4 350 M 06 39.3024805 49.7161884 4 350 M 07 39.2617685 49.6519837 4 350 M 08 39.2204513 49.5883961 4 350 M 09 39.1785338 49.5254340 4 350 M 10 39.1360206 49.4631060 4 350 M 11 39.0929159 49.4014216 4 350 M 12 39.0492241 49.3403895 4 350 M 13 39.0066159 49.2780969 4 350 M 14 38.9644692 49.2152449 4 350 M 15 38.9222706 49.1524222 4 350 M 16 38.8797507 49.0899277 4 350 M 17 38.8366352 49.0280753 4 350 M 18 38.7929289 48.9668736 4 350 M 19 38.7486367 48.9063311 4 350 M 20 38.7037621 48.8464577 4 350 M 21 38.6583113 48.7872608 4 350 M 22 38.6122902 48.7287476 4 350 M 23 38.5657041 48.6709259 4 350 M 24 38.5185581 48.6138042 4 350 M 25 38.4708562 48.5573923 4 350 M 26 38.4226059 48.5016951 4 350 M 27 38.3738131 48.4467203 4 350 M 28 38.3244827 48.3924759 4 350 M 29 38.2746193 48.3389716 4 350 M 30 38.2242306 48.2862117 4 350 M 31 38.1733227 48.2342033 4 350 M 32 38.1219004 48.1829553 4 350 M 33 38.0699697 48.1324750 4 350 M 34 38.0175381 48.0827669 4 350 M 35 37.9646119 48.0338378 4 350 M 36 37.9111950 47.9856985 4 350 M 37 37.8572962 47.9383515 4 350 M 38 37.8029220 47.8918030 4 350 M 39 37.7480774 47.8460621 4 350 M 40 37.6927705 47.8011324 4 350 M 41 37.6370065 47.7570226 4 350 M 42 37.5807933 47.7137369 4 350 M 43 37.5241373 47.6712819 4 350 M 44 37.4670462 47.6296614 4 350 M 45 37.4252437 47.5999131 3 350 M, on LMB with Brazil 10

NOTE: The fixed point FP 01 is equidistant from Punta Médanos in Argentina (Punta Médanos A01b), located at latitude 36º 53' 18.2'' S and longitude 056º 40' 09.8'' W, and Cabo Santa María in Uruguay, located at latitude 34º 40' 06.206'' S and longitude 054º 09' 06.183'' W, compliant with article 70 of Tratado del Río de la Plata y su Frente Marítimo (Treaty of the River Plate and its Maritime Front). 11