Presentation Outline

Similar documents
Western Placer County Transit Operators Short Range Transit Plan Updates FY to FY Project Update and Alternatives Discussion

Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council

LODI CITY COUNCIL Carnegie Forum 305 West Pine Street, Lodi

Regional Fare Change Overview. Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit

CobbLinc Forward Service Package

Chapter 5 Alternatives

Ozaukee County Transit Development Plan

Implementation Guidelines and Performance Measures Special Transportation for Seniors and People with Disabilities (Paratransit) Program

2018 Service Changes Ada County

RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN:

Demand-Responsive Transportation in the TCQSM

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 22, 2014

Rochester Genesee Regional Transportation Authority

Existing Services, Ridership, and Standards Report. June 2018

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

FY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission

Chapter 3. Burke & Company

CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards

PLEASE READ Proposal for Sustainable Service

SRTA Year End Fixed Route Ridership Analysis: FY 2018

Approval of August 2019 Service Changes

Honorable Members of the Mobility Solutions, Infrastructure and Sustainability Committee

DRT Performance Measurement: the U.S. Experience

Fiscal Management and Control Board. Fare Policy October 16, Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only

DAILY TRIPS (LOOP) Monday-Friday 6:55 AM to 6:20 PM 60/60/ 11 Saturday 7:55 AM to 5:55 PM 60/ 10 Sunday

NORTHERN NAPA VALLEY TRANSIT STUDY

EXHIBIT 1. BOARD AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND SUBSEQUENT ISSUANCE OF A JOINT DEVELOPMENT SOLICITATION

September 2019 Service Revisions

Transit System Performance Update

METROPOLITAN EVANSVILLE TRANSIT SYSTEM Part I: Comprehensive Operations Analysis Overview July 9 th, 2015 Public Information Meeting

Service Plan

EX28.6 REPORT FOR ACTION. Advancing Fare Integration SUMMARY. Date: October 16, 2017 To: Executive Committee From: City Manager Wards: All

Transit Options in Marin

New System. New Routes. New Way. May 20, 2014

Transit Financial Summary Abilene MPO FY TIP

Welcome. Sign in Pick up comment form Visit stations to learn more Submit your comment form

TTI REVIEW OF FARE POLICY: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

DRAFT Fare Increase Proposal Spokane Transit Authority. Public Outreach April June 2016

Mount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! wmata.com/bus

Chapter 4. Ridecheck and Passenger Survey

8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

CENTRAL OREGON REGIONAL TRANSIT MASTER PLAN

MDOT MTA: Project Updates and Looking Forward. Kevin Quinn, Administrator 12/12/18

Learn more and comment. See page 10 for details. Proposed Fall 2018 / Spring 2019 SERVICE EXPANSION. and FARE CHANGE

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

GOLDEN CRESCENT REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION

Dial-A-Ride Focus Group Final Report

Bristol Virginia Transit

SAMTRANS SERVICE PLAN

MUSKEGON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM PROPOSAL FOR FARE AND SERVICE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE PHASED IN BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2018

TRANSPORTATION SERVICE Actual

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL

EL PASO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSIT INSTITUTIONAL OPTIONS ASSESSMENT STUDY

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

Rides Mass Transit District. Jackson County Mass Transit District. FY 2020 Program of Projects (POP) Carbondale UZA

Fare Policy Discussion Background and History

WESTERN EL DORADO COUNTY SHORT AND LONG-RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Executive Summary

Follow-up to Proposed Fare Changes for FY2013

Business Intelligence Development at Winnipeg Transit

Memorandum. DATE: May 9, Board of Directors. Jim Derwinski, CEO/Executive Director. Fare Structure Study Fare Pilot Program

DEMOGRAPHICS AND EXISTING SERVICE

Preliminary Fare Increase Proposal Spokane Transit Authority. Public Outreach April and May 2016

Recommendation on bus/rail bus/rail experiments #78 Montrose Bus Six University of Chicago bus routes Six Westside/W est estside/w Suburban

METROLIFT RESOURCE NOTEBOOK

Paratransit Bus Services Guide

Public Meeting. December 19 th, 2018

Development of SH119 BRT Route Pattern Alternatives for Tier 2 - Service Level and BRT Route Pattern Alternatives

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

Prior to reviewing the various performances of Red Apple Transit, it is important to point out some key terminology, including:

GCTD Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) 10:00 a.m. - Wednesday, July 18, 2018 Gold Coast Transit District - Board Room.

Fixed-Route Operational and Financial Review

Why we re here: For educational purposes only

APPENDIX 2 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION SERVICE STANDARDS AND DECISION RULES FOR PLANNING TRANSIT SERVICE

Corridor Analysis. Corridor Objectives and Strategies Express Local Limited Stop Overlay on Local Service 1 Deadhead

Board Box. February Item # Item Staff Page 1. Key Performance Indicators M. Thompson Financial Report for Dec H.

Table of Contents. TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN UPDATE i

Annual Route Report Operating Data. Prepared for: Board of Directors. Final 4/26/2018

Draft SamTrans Service Plan Public Outreach Presentation

CHERRIOTS 2018 SERVICE PLAN 1

VCTC Intercity Five-Year Service Plan

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

TRANSIT WINDSOR REPORT

Appendix A: Regional Fare Policy, SANDAG

The Importance of Service Frequency to Attracting Ridership: The Cases of Brampton and York

Service Recommendation Plan. June 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS

SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT STATE OF CALIFORNIA * * * CODIFIED TARIFF

All Door Boarding Title VI Service Fare Analysis. Appendix P.3

Transit in Toronto. Chair Adam Giambrone Sunday, October

Chapel Hill Transit: Short Range Transit Plan. Preferred Alternative DRAFT

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California

PUBLIC TRANSIT IN KENOSHA, RACINE, AND MILWAUKEE COUNTIES

Houston Regional Transit: Fare Structures (effective March 2015)

STEP ALTERNATIVES RANKING TABLE

Matt Miller, Planning Manager Margaret Heath-Schoep, Paratransit & Special Projects Manager

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Monthly Performance Report

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Transit System Study Pilot Project Implementation Plans. Attachment A

COLT RECOMMENDED BUSINESS PLAN

Transcription:

Presentation Outline Overview of Planning Process Initial Service and Fare Considerations RTC RIDE Fixed-route RTC ACCESS Paratransit Fares Next Steps Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

Overview of Planning Process: Development of Recommendations Review Current Service Performance Compare to adopted standards and policies in the SRTP Identify Improvements Required Solutions to meet the adopted standards Review Financial Projections Determine funding levels available Is this consistent with the adopted FY 2018 2022 SRTP? Develop Initial Concepts Planned improvements from SRTP Solicit Public and Board Input Revise recommendations as needed Final Recommendations

Route Productivity Reallocating service from the least productive routes to the most productive routes will result in the greatest gains in ridership. 10 Most Productive RIDE Routes Productivity % System Cumulative Route (P/RVH) Hours % RAPID 41.9 11.47% 100.00% 5 34.8 4.28% 88.53% 11 34.7 6.51% 84.25% 15 34.4 3.88% 77.74% 4 33.1 2.44% 62.71% 2 32.8 8.19% 70.90% 3 32.5 2.96% 73.86% 12 31.9 5.46% 52.36% 18 31.9 3.24% 46.90% 56 30.0 2.74% 36.94% 1 29.6 7.91% 60.27% 54 28.9 1.88% 30.97% 16 28.2 1.38% 28.03% 7 26.7 6.72% 43.66% System Average 26.4 9 25.1 5.43% 26.65% 25 23.3 1.06% 29.09% 6 20.9 3.11% 21.22% 13 20.6 3.23% 34.20% 10 Least Productive RIDE Routes 14 20.6 3.96% 16.90% 17 19.4 3.33% 8.15% 21 19.3 2.89% 12.94% 26 19.0 1.90% 10.05% 19 18.0 1.21% 18.11% SPIRIT 12.1 3.49% 4.82% INTERCITY 8.5 1.33% 1.33%

Route Productivity Graphical representation of the route productivity. Green most productive Yellow average productivity Red least productive Productivity % System Route (P/RVH) Hours Cumulative % RAPID 42.3 11.4% 100.0% 5 40.3 4.2% 88.6% 11 38.7 6.7% 84.4% 15 35.9 3.9% 77.7% 10 Most Productive 3 34.9 2.9% 73.8% RIDE Routes 2 34.5 8.1% 70.9% 4 33.3 2.4% 62.8% 1 31.9 7.8% 60.4% 12 31.1 5.6% 52.6% 18 30.5 3.2% 46.9% System Average 30.4 7 28.2 6.3% 43.8% 56 28.2 2.7% 37.5% 13 27.6 2.4% 34.8% 54 26.6 1.9% 32.4% 25 25.8 1.1% 30.5% 16 25.6 1.6% 29.4% 10 Least Productive RIDE Routes 9 25.4 5.3% 27.8% 6 23.5 3.1% 22.6% 19 22.0 1.7% 19.5% 14 20.5 4.3% 17.8% 21 19.3 2.7% 13.5% 26 19.0 1.8% 10.8% 17 16.9 3.1% 9.0% SPIRIT 16.8 3.5% 5.9% 18X 13.5 0.5% 2.4% INTERCITY 8.5 1.8% 1.8%

RTC RIDE System Performance

Example of routelevel analysis Boarding and alighting analysis of every bus stop and route in the system. Data reviewed by time of day Identify productive segments by day and time Your RTC. Our Community.

200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Route 17 Outbound - Avg. Wkday Ons Offs On Board 300 Route 17 Inbound - Avg. Wkday 250 200 150 100 Ons Offs On Board 50 0

Example of Segment Run-time Analysis: Blue line = Scheduled service by time of day Red line = Average Actual Run-time by time of day Black line = Median Run-time based on all samples

RTC RIDE Service Change Considerations Improve service by adjusting segment run-times Reflects more accurately how the service actually performs Reallocate service from less productive to more productive routes Restore service to Route 5 that was reduced in 2008 Addresses overcrowding and schedule adherence problems Increase frequency in the Primary Transit Network (PTN) Requires reducing or eliminating less productive service, and/or investing more resources in these routes Implement pilot program Microtransit Method of serving less productive areas with smaller vehicles on demand

Microtransit What is it? Microtransit is route deviated service utilizing smaller, more agile vehicles that can pick-up passengers at their door or at a nearby pick-up location. Passengers are transported to an existing RTC RIDE bus stop at a major activity center Integration of Technology a key component of microtransit is the use of technology to tailor service for more specific origin/destination locations. Trips are requested by a smartphone app or other device and reserved real time.

Microtransit Demonstration Service Serves low productivity areas Connect shopping areas and RIDE service Flexible routing No separate ADA service needed Requires new vehicles

RTC ACCESS Improvements Eliminate all service in the non-ada area Approximately 1% of all trips (7-8 passengers/day) Trips outside the ADA boundary cost on average over $30 to provide, $60.00 round trip; Average ACCESS trip costs $25.00 Operate RTC ACCESS same days and hours as RTC RIDE Provide service only as required by the ADA by time of day Effects approximately 1,600 trips per month mostly by 104 individuals Estimated annual savings $408K Expand Washoe Senior Ride (WSR) Taxi Bucks Program Drop household income limitation, increase subsidy to 75%, increase number of books from two to three per month, and allow Uber and Lyft (TNCs) Align No-Show Policy with Federal recommendations

RTC RIDE Fare Considerations College Pass free rides for all students funded by an annual contribution RTC Employee/Contractor Transit Benefit expand to immediate family Fare sales modify policy to allow special event or holiday fare sales Expand Free Ride Days -- to include holidays, Election Day, Earth Day, and other special events as requested by the Board or Executive Director Create Calendar Day Pass Reduce price from $5.00 to $3.00 Eliminate 24-hour day pass and eliminate free transfers Eliminate 10-Day Pass encourages use of reduce 24-hour pass Reduce 7-Day Pass from $19.50 to $14.50 Cost per trip same as 31-Day Pass Eliminate special $26.00, 31-Day Disabled Pass Make same as $32.00 reduced Senior/Youth pass Increase ACCESS ID cash fare from $0.50 to $0.75 and decrease the disabled cash fare from $1.00 to $0.75 Designed to discourage people from applying for ACCESS just to pay less on RIDE Reduce senior fare eligibility from 65 to 60 years old

Next Steps February 2018 Service Improvement Open Houses February 20, 21, and 22 RTC CENTENNIAL PLAZA STATION February 20 from 4 pm to 6 pm RTC 4 TH STREET STATION February 22 from 7 am to 9 am Meadowood Mall Transfer Point (RTC RIDE Bus) from 11 am to 1 pm Stead Elementary School (Stead Blvd RTC RIDE Bus) from 3 pm to 5 pm March 2018 Board Presentation of Service Improvements and feedback May 2018 Service Improvement Public Hearing and Board Approval September 2018 Service Change Implemented Your RTC. Our Community.

THANK YOU! Michael Dulude, Transit Planner/Scheduler mdulude@rtcwashoe.com (775) 335-1904 Susi Trinidad, Paratransit Analyst strinidad@rtchwashoe.com (775) 332-2173 Ed Park, Transit Planner epark@rtcwashoe.com (775) 335-1853 This is Your RTC.