Regional Fare Change Overview. Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit

Similar documents
Fare Policy Discussion Background and History

Establishes a fare structure for Tacoma Link light rail, to be implemented in September 2014.

Fiscal Management and Control Board. Fare Policy October 16, Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

Welcome. Sign in Pick up comment form Visit stations to learn more Submit your comment form

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

Business Item Transportation Committee SW Item:

Appendix A: Regional Fare Policy, SANDAG

Chapter 3. Burke & Company

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

Mobile Farebox Repair Program: Setting Standards & Maximizing Regained Revenue

Dial-A-Ride Focus Group Final Report

Sound Transit Operations August 2015 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Existing Services, Ridership, and Standards Report. June 2018

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

ATTACHMENT NB 3.A. AVTA Fare Study. DRAFT Proposed Fare Structure Report

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

Title VI Analysis for Route Based Fares

TTI REVIEW OF FARE POLICY: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

Fare Revenue Report 2016 FARE REVENUE REPORT

CHERRIOTS 2018 SERVICE PLAN 1

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

Ozaukee County Transit Development Plan

EX28.6 REPORT FOR ACTION. Advancing Fare Integration SUMMARY. Date: October 16, 2017 To: Executive Committee From: City Manager Wards: All

All Door Boarding Title VI Service Fare Analysis. Appendix P.3

DRT Performance Measurement: the U.S. Experience

Transit Performance Report FY (JUNE 30, 2007)

Service Plan

Sound Transit Operations December 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

SAMTRANS SERVICE PLAN

Sound Transit Operations June 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Bus Operations Report

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 22, 2014

ESCAMBIA COUNTY AREA TRANSIT MTAC REPORT

Why we re here: For educational purposes only

DRAFT Service Implementation Plan

Presentation Outline

PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

Sound Transit Operations January 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

LODI CITY COUNCIL Carnegie Forum 305 West Pine Street, Lodi

Sound Transit Operations February 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

2010 MTA Financial Plan & Proposed LIRR Service Reductions Supplemental Information. MTA Long Island Rail Road

Matt Miller, Planning Manager Margaret Heath-Schoep, Paratransit & Special Projects Manager

EL PASO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSIT INSTITUTIONAL OPTIONS ASSESSMENT STUDY

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

Horizon 1 Implementation Update

Follow-up to Proposed Fare Changes for FY2013

YRT/VIVA PROPOSED FARE INCREASE

DEMOGRAPHICS AND EXISTING SERVICE

* Data for prior months has been updated to reflect error corrections from missing passenger count data

Approval of August 2019 Service Changes

Memorandum. DATE: May 9, Board of Directors. Jim Derwinski, CEO/Executive Director. Fare Structure Study Fare Pilot Program

Proposed variation to fare policies in the Regional Public Transport Plan 2014 (variation 3) Supporting documentation and statement of proposal

Sound Transit Operations March 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Why does 2010 feel like the dark ages for fare collection? Fred Combs Lextran, Planning and Technology Manager Lexington, Kentucky

The 15-day comment period will run from Thursday, April 4, 2019 to 4pm on Wednesday April 18, 2019.

Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs CTAA Expo June 2014

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California

RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN:

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER 2017

New System. New Routes. New Way. May 20, 2014

Sound Transit Operations January 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode

Sound Transit Operations January 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

TRANSIT WINDSOR REPORT

Sound Transit Operations March 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode

MONTHLY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2017

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Board of Directors Information Summary

Report by Finance Committee (B) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

MUSKEGON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM PROPOSAL FOR FARE AND SERVICE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE PHASED IN BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2018

Public Transport funding in a crisis: A National Treasury perspective

Rides Mass Transit District. Jackson County Mass Transit District. FY 2020 Program of Projects (POP) Carbondale UZA

The Boulder (and Boulder County) Experience. June 6 th, 2017 RTD s Pass Program Working Group 2 nd Meeting

October REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

PUBLIC TRANSIT IN KENOSHA, RACINE, AND MILWAUKEE COUNTIES

1. Introduction. 2. Overview of Existing Conditions

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Monthly Performance Report

Bristol Virginia Transit

September 2014 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management Sub-Regional Report PERFORMANCE MEASURES

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

NORTHERN NAPA VALLEY TRANSIT STUDY

Chapel Hill Transit: Short Range Transit Plan. Preferred Alternative DRAFT

FY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

DRAFT Fare Increase Proposal Spokane Transit Authority. Public Outreach April June 2016

Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org. tweet about this #FarePolicy

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

Presentation to the Southeast Corridor High-Performance Transit Alternative Study Public Forum. Overview of MTA. presented by

Performance Measures Year End Updated-

WESTERN EL DORADO COUNTY SHORT AND LONG-RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Executive Summary

UPDATE ON WEST SACRAMENTO'S ON-DEMAND RIDESHARE

Preliminary Fare Increase Proposal Spokane Transit Authority. Public Outreach April and May 2016

Administrative Operations Report

2 YORK REGION TRANSIT MOBILITY PLUS 2004 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Caroline County / King George County Transit Studies. Meeting November 1, 2017

Transit Fare Review Phase 2 Discussion Guide

Transcription:

Regional Fare Change Overview Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit Committee of the Whole April 5 th, 2017

Today s Presentation Fare change goals and considerations Public engagement overview Next steps 2

Total Projected Transportation Deficit State Fiscal Years 2018-19 Nov 16 SFY 18-19 Feb 17 SFY 18-19 MVST Downturn (SFY 2016 2019) $43 $34 Metro Mobility Growth 24 24 Certificates of Participation 9 9 Other (inflationary pressures) 13 7 Total Projected Deficit $89 $74 3

Bus Farebox Recovery History 34.0% 32.0% 30.0% 28.0% 26.0% 24.0% 22.0% 20.0% Most Recent Fare 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Farebox Recovery Ratio Target (Proj.) 4

2017 Fare Change Goals Generate Additional Fare Revenues Increase revenues across all modes and service (Metro Transit, regional and contract service, Metro Mobility and Transit Link) while minimizing any ridership impacts Promote Equity Price fares so that they account for an equitable portion of operating costs and reflect the ability of customers to pay Simplify Make the fare structure easier to use and understand Success Factors Ensure all residents and communities are partners in the decision making process Generate sufficient revenues to off-set the need for service cuts Find ways to mitigate the impact of increased fares on those that are most transit reliant Simplify the how to pay question 5

Overview of Primary Scenarios Scenario 1 increases fares $0.25 at all fare levels with a similar increase to pass prices Scenario 2 increases fares $0.50 at all fare levels with a similar increase to pass prices Limited Mobility* and reduced fares** base increases by $0.25 (to $1) in all scenarios Northstar fares increase at the same value as the express fare *Limited Mobility requires certification based on a qualifying disability **Reduced fares = 65 yrs.+, 6-12 yrs., Medicare card holders Off Peak Local Peak Local Off Peak Express Peak Express Current $1.75 $2.25 $2.25 $3.00 Scenario 1 $2.00 $2.50 $2.50 $3.25 Scenario 2 $2.25 $2.75 $2.75 $3.50 6

Scenario 1 Preliminary Analysis Fares increase of $0.25 for all fare levels with a similar increase to pass prices All numbers are first year estimates Estimated Change in Ridership Estimated % of Ridership Change Estimated Annual Change in Revenues Estimated Regional Impact (3.8M) (-4.7%) $6.9M Scenario is consistent with previous two fare increases (2005, 2008) Larger impact to Metro Transit given smaller relative increase to express fares About 80% of suburban transit provider service is express service vs. 10% for Metro Transit Over 90% of all cash usage is in local fare sets Estimated 18-24 months to recover lost ridership 7

Scenario 2 Preliminary Analysis Fares increase of $0.50 for all fare levels All numbers are first year estimates Estimated Change in Ridership Estimated % of Ridership Change Estimated Annual Change in Revenues Estimated Regional Impact (7.1M) (-8.9%) $12.8M $5.9 million in additional revenues gained over scenario one with 3.3 million additional rides lost Estimated 334k additional rides lost on express, 3M additional rides lost on local compared to scenario one Additional revenues could offset help offset revenue reductions from low income and other options 8

Other Options For All Scenarios Eliminate peak surcharge for seniors (65+), youth (6-12), and Medicare card holders Simplify and make the fares easier to understand Eliminate the off-peak express fare (one express fare) Eliminate stored value bonus Make the Transit Assistance Pass (TAP) low income program permanent 9

Additional Fare Policy Considerations Eliminate Go-To stored value bonus (10%) About $1.9M in bonus value added in 2016 Allows Metro Mobility and Transit Link to charge full cash fare for Go-To users Could result in about $1.8M in increased revenues Elimination of peak surcharge for seniors, youth and Medicare card holders Helps off-set a proposed increase in peak fares, elimination of off-peak express fare set (scenario 2 & 3) Minimal impact expected with any shift in riders to peak hours w/reduced fare Estimated $665k reduction in revenues 10

Establish Permanent Transit Assistance Pass (TAP) program Approximately one month remaining in current pilot test Pilot test analysis indicates positive reaction of participants: Usage rates near or higher than other customer programs such as Upass or Metropass Users averaged 32 rides per card in February Majority of rides occur during off peak hours, urban local routes 90% overall use in local fare sets Very little express use Majority of revenues collected in fare set 1 (lower overall revenue impact) Initial estimates of $3M revenue reduction Program assumes no additional Metro Transit administrative burden 11

Metro Mobility Fares Change Impacts 12 Increased fares will reduce current ridership growth trends by an estimated 6% in first year 2018 2019 Total Number of Est. Rides Reduced 142,000 213,000 355,000 Subsidy Per Ride $26 $26 $26 Savings from Reduced Demand $3.70 Million $5.54 Million $9.23 Million Fare increase will generate between $2.4 and $3.6 million over two years Additional Revenues Increase Amount 2018 2019 Total Option 1 $0.50 $1.18 Million $1.22 Million $2.40 Million Option 2 $0.75 $1.78 Million $1.83 Million $3.61 Million Combined savings and revenues of $11.63M - $12.84M over two years for Metro Mobility Fare incentive for transfers at select fixed route stations Distance surcharge for Non-ADA rides > 15 miles

Transit Link Fare Change Impacts Increased fares will reduce current ridership growth Option 1 ($1.60 Increase) Option 2 ($1.85 Increase) 2018-2019 2018-2019 Number of Est. Rides Reduced 32,610 97,826 Subsidy Per Ride $20 $20 Savings from Reduced Demand $812K $1.63 M Fare increase will generate additional revenue Additional Revenues Average Increase 2018 2019 Total Option 1 $1.60 $496,000 $522,000 $1.02 Million Option 2 $1.85 $543,000 $573,000 $1.12 Million Combined savings and revenues of $1.85M - $2.75M over two years Includes no acceptance of all you can ride passes Distance surcharge for rides > 15 miles 13

Northstar Fares Northstar fares increase at the same value as express fares ($0.25 or $0.50 based on scenarios 1 & 2) Station Current Weekday Fare New Fare - Scenario 1 New Fare - Scenario 2 Big Lake $6.00 $6.25 $6.50 Elk River $4.50 $4.75 $5.00 Ramsey $3.50 $3.75 $4.00 Anoka $3.00 $3.25 $3.50 Coon Rapids- Riverdale $3.00 $3.25 $3.50 Fridley $3.00 $3.25 $3.50 Station-to-Station $3.00 $3.25 $3.50 14

Title VI What Is It? Ensures public participation in any major transit service changes or fare increases Requires analysis of fare impacts on low income and minority customers Ensures that changes do not cause a disparate impact on these groups Requires consideration of mitigations if changes may cause disparate impacts Not required for demand responsive service or ADA paratransit service 15

Public Input Process Formal meetings Open house format Receive public comment Throughout region Pop-up meetings Major transit hubs During busy travel times Less formal, still collect input Connect with community organizations Existing partners, EAC 16

Fare Increase Schedule Committee of the Whole April 5 th TAAC April 5 th Public Meeting Approval Transportation Committee April 10 th Full Council April 12th Public Meetings Mid-April to June Fare Increase Approval June/July Fare Increase September 1 st 17