~G%~~~IDBE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY Ser LSD41/ FEB 04

Similar documents
5750 ADM 15 Feb 05. From: Commanding Officer, USS GUNSTON HALL (LSD 44) To : Director, Naval Historical Center

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAW USS AUSTIN (LPD-4) f f FPO AE Ser LPD4/X: 063

1. In accordance with reference (a), enclosures (1) through (4) are submitted.

Subj: SHIP'S HISTORY SUBMISSION FOR USS HURRICANE (PC-3) Acting

USS AUSTIN (LPD-4) FPO AE

From: Commanding Officer, USS SHREVEPORT (LPD 12) I. 1. In accordance with reference (a). enclosures 1 through 5 are forwarded.

MAR From: Commanding Officer, USS COMSTQCK (LSD 45) To: Chief of Naval Operations (OP 09BH) Subj: COMMAND HISTORY FOR 1998

u s CH~~ORSVILLE (CQ 62) FPO APm Code Apr 99

1. Enclosure (1) i s forwarded to accordance with referance (a).

uss SAIPAW (LBA 2) COllaUWD HISTORY

FLBET POST OFFICE AA

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS MARYLAND (SSBN 738) FPO AA Ser NAV/ Mar 94 From: Commanding Officer, USS MARYLAND (SSBN 738) (GOLD) To

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS BOONE (FFG-28) FPO AA

Encl: (1) USS INGRAHAM (FFG 61) Command History for 2004 (2) CDR Colby Biography (3) CDR Polk Biography (4) Welcome Aboard Pamphlet R. W.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY. 25 Jan 00

Commanding Officer, USS HALYBURTON (FFG-40) Director of Naval History, (OP-09BH), Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC 20374

From: Commanding Officer, USS ELROD (FFG 55) To: Commanding Officer, Naval Historical Center Bldg. 57, Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC

Suhj: COMMAND HISTORY, USS JOHN L HALL (FFG 32) 2003 (U)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS DUBUQUE (LPD-81 FPO AP

Subj: 1995 COMMAND HISTORY FOR USS GUNSTON HALL (LSD-44) 1. In accordance with reference osures (1) through (5) are submitted. L.

Feb 04. Subj: COMMAND HISTORY FOR 2003 (OPNAV ) Ref: (a) OPNAVINST H

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS GUNSTON HALL (LSD 44) FPO AE Subj: 2003 COMMAND HISTORY FOR USS GUNSTON HALL (LSD-44)

1. Per reference (a), enclosures (1) through (4) are submitted.

5000 Ser 690/ Subj: COMMAND HISTORY FOR CY Ref: (a) OPNAVINST J. Encl: (1) Command History for USS PHILADELPHIA (SSN 690)

&fsr G. FLANAG JAN DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS MONTEREY (CG 61) FLEET POST OFFICE AE ser

U. S. S. CLEVELAND (LPD-7) FLEET POST OFFICE SAN FRANCISCO 96601

Director of Naval History (OP-09B9), Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC

COMMANDING OFFICER USS MEMPHIS (SSN 691) FPO AE

Subj: SUBMISSION OF BASIC HISTORICAL NARRATIVE FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1997

LPD13:16 :ld 5750 Ser: March 1978

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS NASSAU (LHA-4) FPO AE

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS DUBUQUE (LPD 8) FPO AP

I FEB Ser SSN768/6% From: Commanding Officer, USS HARTFORD (SSN 768) To : Commander, Submarine Group TWO (01P) Subj: COMMAND HISTORY

Ref: (a) OPNAVINST D (b) Deputy Director of Naval History ltr 5757 Ser SH/18232 dated 21 November 1989 D. S. QLADMAN

USS AUSTIN (LPD-4) FPO NEW YORK

From: Commanding Officer, USS GUNSTON HALL- (LSD-44) To : Director of Naval History (OP-09BH) Subj: 1996 COMMAND HISTORY FOR USS GUNSTON HALL (LSD-44)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS NASSAU (LHA-4) FPO AE

COMMANDING OFFICER USS CHICAGO (SSN-72 1 FLEET POST OFFICE SAN FRANCISCO

BASIC HISTORY. 1. Command Organization

F. R. DONOVAN USS NASHVILLE (LPD-13) FLEET POST OFFICE NEW YORK, NEW YORK LPD 13: 16:adp 5750 Ser June 1982

Commanding Officer, USS GLADIATOR (MCM-11) Chief of Naval Operations (N09BH) (1) Command History for Calendar Year 1999.

5750 Ser X /\Io 2 3 MAR 199\ Commanding Officer, USS AUSTIN (LPD-4) Director of Naval History (OP-09BH), Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC 20370

DEPARTMENT USS HALY BURTON (FFG 40) FLEET POST OFFICE

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS ELROD (FFG 55) FLEET POST OFFICE MIAMI SO9

1. Enclosure (1) is forwarded in accordance with reference (a).

%"""! 1. Per reference (a), enclosure (1) is submitted as USS CHAMPION'S Command History for Calendar Year 1993.

1. Per references (a) and (b) enclosure (1) is submitted.

From,: Commanding Officer, USS MARYLAND (SSBN 738)(BLUE) To: Director of Naval History (NOgBH), Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC

USS BOONE (FFQ-28) FPO M

USS NASHVILLE (LPD-13) FLEET POST OFFICE

5757 Ser FFG 43/ MAR 1994

5750 Ser C0/ May 02. From: Commanding Officer, USS McCLUSKY (FFG 41) To : Chief of Naval Operations (N09BH)

From: Commanding Officer, USS DONALD COOK (DDG 75) To: Director of Naval History (NOSBH), Washington Navy Yard, Washington, D.C.

Commanding Officer, USS HALYBURTON (FFG-40) Director of Naval History, (OP-09BH). Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC 20374

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS THUNDERBOLT (PC 12) FPO AE

USS FIREBOLT (PC 10) Command History 1998 Command Composition and Organization

DEPARTMENTOFTHENAVY. (c) 3rd Battalion, 4th Marines (d) TACRON ONE. (f) Elements of 4th Marines (g) 3rd Marine Division

Subj: SUBMISSION OF ANNUAL COMMAND HISTORY FOR 2001

Ser 728~ (495)/036. c. c. HA~ES Acting. Copy to: GOLD CREW CINCPACFLT PA0 COMSUBPAC PA0 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

USS NASHVILLE CLPD-13) NLTrOIITOmCE NEW YORK. NEW YORK 09501

5750 Ser 760/ From: Commanding Officer, USS ANNAPOLIS (SSN 760) To : Director, Naval Historical Center

USS FLORIDA (SSGN 728) FLEET POST OFFICE AE 0956S2099

From: Commanding Officer, USS FLORIDA (SSBN 728) (BLUE) To: Director, Naval Historical Center (N09BH)

CARRIER STRIKE GROUPS

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COMMANDING OFFICER USS ASHLAND (LSD 48) FPO A D" Unclassified upon removal of enclosure (2)

J{b_",fl (, j j?j ) UL

Inport Pearl Harbor, HI, pier M-1&2. Underway for SILENT FURY. Inport Pearl Harbor, HI, pier B-18. Hull Cleaning. Underway for CART 11.

W.. T. CROOKS DEPARTMENTOFTHENAVY USS GRAPPLE (ARS-53) C/O FPO NEW YORK. NEW YORK Ser 03/ MAR 1992

1. In accordance with reference (a), enclosures (1) through (3)

db dbl i COMMAND HISTORY USS BLACK HAWK (MHC 58)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS WHIDBEY ISLAND (LSD 41) FPO AE

(4) Supporting Documentation. 1. In accordance with reference (a), enclosures (1) through (4) are submitted. F. J. DOBRYDNEY

4 Picture of USS BREMERTON (SSN698) ( 5 ) USS BREMERTON (SSN698 ) Commissioning Program

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS CLEVELAND (LPD-7) FLEET POST OFFICE SIN FRANCISCO

t (Unclassified upon removal of enclosure (2))

USS AUGUSTA (SSN 710) FPO AE To: Director o f Naval History (OP-09BH), Washi

3&&lo DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY. 3 Mar In accordance with reference (a), enclosures (1) through (4) are forwarded.

Ref: (a) OPT2lVIlJST Bof 20 May 1971

Subj: 1976 Command History Ref: (a) OPNAVINST B (1) Command Organization and 1976 Highlights (2) Summary of Operations

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS KEARSARGE (LHD 3) FPO AE

From: Commanding Officer, USS JOHN L HALL (FFG 32) To: Director of Naval History (OP-09BH), Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC 20374

USS NASHVILLE CLPD-133 FLEET POST OFFICE NEW YORK, NEW ~ORK LPD13/16:bcb 575% Ser j 6

From: Commanding Officer, USS CROMMELIN (FFG 37) To: Director of Naval History (OP-09BH) Subj : COMMAND HISTORY 1994 (OPNAV REPORT )

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS HONOLULU (SSN-718) FPO AP

To: Director, Naval Historical Center From: USS HARPERS FERRY (LSD 49) Subject: Conmand History. Sir,

DEPARTMENT OFT E A COMMANDING OFFICER USS ASHLAND (LSD 48) FPO AE

- 31 December LSD 42. From: Commanding Officer, USS GERMANTOWN (LSD 42) To: Director of Naval History (OP-09BH)

USS W CH WFG 43) FPO AF

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY! r" USS COLUMBUS (SSN 762) FPO AP

UD4 :PMC:mr 5700 Ser: February From: Commanding Officer, USS AUSTIN (UD-4) Chief of Naval Operations (OP-09B9)

FPO SAN FRANCISCO S6601

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS GRAPPLE (ARS 53) C/O FPO AE NEW YORK

5750 Ser LSD42/097. From: Commanding Officer, USS GERMANTOWN (LSD 42) To : Director of Naval History

Commanding Officer, USS ROBERT G. BRADLEY (FFG 49) Director of Naval History (OP-09BH), Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC 20374

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

5750 Ser ADM/ Feb 93. From: Commanding Officer, USS MONTEREY (CG 61) To : Director of Naval History (OP-09BH)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY - USS COLUMBUS (SSN 762) FPO AP /<-*/o \//f Iq7

Q56 ab U. S. S. CLEVELAND ( LPD-7) FLEET POST OFFICE SAN FRANCISCO Ser

(4) Supporting Documents 1. In accordance with reference (a), enclosures (1) through (4) the activities of USS JUNEAU (LPD 10) for

Transcription:

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS WHlDBEY ISLAND (LSD 41) FPO AE 09591-1729 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1000 Ser LSD41/056 22 FEB 04 From: COMMANDING OFFICER, USS WHIDBEY ISLAND (LSD 41) To : Director, Naval Historical Center, 805 Kidder Breese Street SE Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5059 Subj : USS WHIDBEY ISLAND (LSD-41) 2003 COMMAND HISTORY Ref: (a) OPNAVINST 5750.12H ~G%~~~IDBE ISLAND 1. Enclosed is the command h' (LSD-41)' prepared and subm' ted in accorda ce with reference (a).

USS WHIDBEY ISLAND COMMAND HISTORY I. COMPOSITION AND ORGANIZATION COMMAND COMPOSITION AND ORGANIZATION USS WHIDBEY ISLAND (LSD 41) carries out its mission conducting prompt and sustained combat operations at sea, worldwide, in support of national policy. Designed, built and manned to carry maneuver-warfare vehicles and "over-the-horizon" amphibious assault vehicles, WHIDBEY ISLAND - home ported at Little Creek Amphibious Base, Va., and under the command of Commander, Amphibious Group TWO - can carry four landing craft air cushions (LCAC) or thirty-six amphibious assault vehicles (AAV) in its floodable well. During assaults, WHIDBEY ISLAND serves as primary control ship and provides a boat haven with docking, repair and refieling services to landing craft and boats, thereby making it ideally suited to support our Navy's foremost strike asset, the U. S. Marine. The WHIDBEY ISLAND-class introduces to the Fleet significant improvements in communications, combat systems, 20- and 60-ton cranes, expanded repair shops, two helicopter landing spots, complete medical facilities, automated computer-based logistics support and an impressive engineering plant, making it capable of self-sufficient operations. Equally as effective in peacetime as in wartime, the well-suited WHlDBEY ISLAND can carry out a variety of humanitarian missions to effect of evacuations and disaster relief. Designed with the primary missions of amphibious warfare, mobility, command and control and anti-air warfare in mind, WHIDBEY ISLAND supports special warfare, fleetsupport operations (refieling other ships), non-combatant operations, ocean surveillance and electronic warfare. Clearly a multi-mission capable ship, WHIDBEY ISLAND'S crew, embarked Marines and detachments must be and are multi-talented. Representing almost every state in the Union, Puerto Rico, the U. S. Virgin Islands and the Philippines, everyone aboard is privileged and proud to serve aboard USS WHIDBEY ISLAND (LSD 41).

USS WHIDBEY ISLAND COMMAND HISTORY IL CHRONOLOGY CHRONOLOGY 1 January 4 April 9-12May 4-8 June 12-15 June 11-15 August 18-21 August 2-4 September 15-16 September 22 September 5 October 8-17 October 20-24 October 27-31 October 3-7 November 17-23 November 1-23 December 15 December 22 December Moored at NORSHIPCO, Norfolk, VA Berth-shift from NORSHlPCO to NAB Little Creek Sea Trials Main Propulsion Diesel Engine Run-ins Main Propulsion Diesel Engine Run-ins Command Assessment of Readiness and Training (CART)II Engineering 1 Deck Tailored Ship's Training Availability (TSTA) Berth-shift to Norfolk Naval Shipyard Berth-shift to NAB Little Creek Berth-shift to Naval Station Norfolk Amphibious SquadronlMarine Expeditionary Unit Integration (PMINT) EngineeringICombat SystemsIDeck TSTA Expeditionary Strike Group Exercise (ESGEX) Engineering Underway Demonstration (UD) Final Evaluation Problem (FEP)

USS WHIDBEY ISLAND COMMAND HISTORY 111. NARRATIVE NARRATIVE Whidbey Island brought in 2003 pier-side at Norfolk Shipbuilding and Dry-dock Corporation (NorShipCo) in the middle of what would be a nine-month planned maintenance availability period. During this time all four main propulsion diesel engines, all four ships service diesel engines, twenty ballast tanks, and both boilers were overhauled. Repairs were effected to the ship's stem-gate, boat davit, and 60-ton crane. The majority of the well deck was re-planked, and the entire flight deck was stripped and recovered with non-skid. Several communications upgrades were completed, including HYDRA, an internal communications system that would prove to be extremely usefbl in coordinating the ship's day-to-day evolutions. In a ceremony at NorShipCo on February 7&, Commander Mark R. Hoyle was relieved by Commander Alphonso Woods as Commanding Officer of USS Whidbey Island. Commander Woods continued preparing the crew and the ship for the inevitable time Whidbey Island would once again put Marines on the beach. With the majority of the repairs and upgrades complete, Whidbey Island was towed down the Elizabeth River on April 4'b and docked in her homeport, Naval Amphibious Base, Little Creek (NABLC). Here, repairs and upgrades continued until the ship was ready for Sea Trials and hrther training. A total of 33 million dollars was spent making Whidbey Island ready for continued operations at sea. On May 9&, Whidbey Island was towed out to sea for sea trials. Host to many NorShipCo workers and subject matter experts in a variety of fields, Whidbey Island was underway on her own power for the first time in nine months. After a short shakedown to determine what was lee to repair, she returned to port on the 12" of May. For the next few weeks, improvements continued. From June 4& to June 8& and fkom June 1 2 to ~ June 15", Whidbey Island was once again at sea. This time, the mission was to accomplish engine run-ins, a controlled process of breaking in the newly rebuilt diesel engines to maximize economy and reliability. The remainder of June and the month of July were spent continuing maintenance and training the crew for the many upcoming inspections and certifications. The Damage Control Training Team (DCTT), Combat Systems Training Team (CSTT), Engineering Training Team (ETT), Seamanship Training Team (STT), and Medical Training Team (MTT) continued training during this time. From the 11" to the 15" of August, Whidbey Island's officers and crew proved that their training had mot been in vain. Successfblly completing CART 11, a significant milestone in the ship's inter-deployment training cycle, the Whidbey Island team proved that it was ready for more challenging and advanced training. The following week, from the 1 8 to ~ the 21a, Whidbey Island was underway for completion of her first Tailored Ship Training Availability (TSTA). During these TSTAs, the engineering, seamanship, damage control, combat system, and medical training teams would be trained and evaluated in respect to their ability to train the crew. The focus this week was ETT, DCTT, and STT. As a part of the STT training, Whidbey Island performed a "dry hook-up" with USNS John Lenthall Jr. (T-A0 189) on the 19". This consisted of making an approach and connecting all lines and hoses with the fleet oiler to practice underway replenishment. Although no he1 was transferred, this evolution proved to be outstanding training for both deck department and bridge watch standers. USS Whidbey Island was once again underway on the 2"d of September for another. She stayed underway until the 4", when she returned to Little Creek, VA. With work having been done on Whidbey Island's main engines, she was unable to get underway

USS WHIDBEY ISLAND COMh4AND HISTORY 111. NARRATIVE in avoidance of an oncoming tropical storm, which would later that month be known as Hurricane Isabel. On the 15&, Whidbey Island was towed to Naval Station, Norfolk, and on the 16: she was towed hrther up the Elizabeth River to Norfolk Naval Shipyard in Portsmouth, Virginia. Here, the ship weathered out the storm and remained until the 22nd, when tugs towed Whidbey Island back to her homeport, NABLC. October proved to be the beginning of an intense period of training as the ship spent a significant period of time at sea in pre-deployment preparations. On the 5&, Whidbey Island transited to Naval Station, Nontblk and began a security exercise. As part of the exercise, the simulated Force Protection Level increased, and Whidbey Island was forced to get underway. The 8& of September saw USS Whidbey Island transiting outbound to sea for an Amphibious Squadron (PHIBR0N)lMarine Expeditionary Unit (MEW Integration (Pm) exercise. This underway proved to be an excellent opportunity for both the Navy and the Marine Corps elements of the newly formed Expeditionary Strike Group (ESG) to familiarize themselves with the other's respective needs and abilities. This gave both the "blue" and "green7' teams the opportunity to work together for the first time as an ESG. USS Whidbey Island returned to homeport on the 17& and was once again underway on the 20& for another. She returned on the 24&. Yet another was completed underway fiom the 27& to the 31"'. From November 3* to the 7&, another TSTA would take place, but this would include CSTT, STT, and ETT. Further engineering training was accomplished fiom the 17& to the 23d. On December I", Whidbey Island was underway from NABLC in support of the East Coast's first Expeditionary Strike Group Exercise (ESGEX). The following day, Whidbey Island moored in Morehead City, NC to on-load Marines fiom the 22"d Marine Expeditionary Unit 0. Whidbey Island left port that same day and arrived on station in nearby Onslow Bay to conduct amphibious operations until the 6&, when she began her transit to the Gulf of Mexico. En-route, the ship conducted an underway replenishment with USNS Arctic (AOE-8) on the 7&. In the company of USS Wasp (LHD-l), USS Yorktown (CG-48), USS Leyte Gulf (CG-59, and USS McFaul @DG-74), Whidbey Island arrived on station in the vicinity of Eglin Air Force Base on the lofh of December. This would be the first time such an exercise would be conducted at Eglin AFB, as the previous location, Vieques Island, Puerto Rico was no longer available for such training. Consisting of multiple amphibious raids and assaults, this exercise was a success, as all of the units involved received outstanding training, both as individual units and as an ESG. In transit to Onslow Bay, Whidbey Island successfully completed the Underway Demonstration, a significant engineering milestone, on the 15&. Whidbey Island returned to Morehead City on the 22nd of December and was underway that afternoon. That same evening, the final milestone of the inter-deployment training cycle, the Final Evaluation Problem (FEP) was completed. Having passed FEP, Whidbey Island proceeded to Little Creek on the 23d. This would begin a short holiday period, which would give the crew a brief respite before continuing the advanced phase training in support of the rapidly approaching deployment, the next calendar year.