Proficiency Testing. Drinking Water Microbiology. September Tommy Šlapokas NFA PT

Proficiency Testing Drinking Water Microbiology September 21 Tommy Šlapokas NFA PT Since 181

Edition Version 1 (21-11-) Editor in chief Hans Lindmark, Head of Biology department, National Food Agency Responsible for the scheme Tommy Šlapokas, Microbiologist, Biology department, National Food Agency PT March 21 is registered as no. 21/27 at the National Food Agency, Uppsala

Proficiency testing Drinking water Microbiology September 21 Parameters included Coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli with membrane filter method (MF) Coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli, (rapid methods with MPN) Suspected thermotolerant coliform bacteria with MF (not assessed) Intestinal enterococci with MF Pseudomonas aeruginosa with MF Culturable microorganisms (total count) days incubation at 22±2 C Culturable microorganisms (total count) 2 days incubation at ±2 C Tommy Šlapokas Irina Boriak, Kirsi Mykkänen & Marianne Törnquist National Food Agency, Biology department, Box 22, SE-751 2 Uppsala, Sweden

Abbreviations and explanations Microbiological media CCA Chromocult Coliform Agar (Merck; EN ISO 8-1:214) Colilert Colilert Quanti-Tray (IDEXX Inc.; EN ISO 8-2:214) LES m-endo Agar LES (according to SS 2817) LTTC m-lactose TTC Agar with Tergitol (according to EN ISO 8-1:2) m-ent m-enterococcus Agar (Slanetz & Bartley; according to EN ISO 87-2:2) m-fc m-fc Agar (according to SS 2817) PACN Pseudomonas Agar base/cn agar (with cetrimide and nalidixic acid; according to EN ISO 12:28) YeA Yeast extract Agar (according to EN ISO 222:1) Other abbreviations MF Membrane filter (method) MPN "Most Probable Number" (quantification based on statistical distributions) ISO "International Organization for Standardization" and their standards EN European standard from "Comité Européen de Normalisation" (CEN) NMKL "Nordisk Metodikkomité for næringsmidler" and their standards DS, NS, SFS, SS National standards from Denmark, Norway, Finland and Sweden Legend to method comparison tables N total number of laboratories that reported methods and numerical results n number of results except false results and outliers Mv mean value (with outliers and false results excluded) Med median value (with outliers and false results included) CV coefficient of variation = relative standard deviation in percentage of the mean, calculated from square root transformed results F number of false positive or false negative results < number of low outliers > number of high outliers total number of results for the parameter 1 remarkably low result 278 remarkably high result or CV or many deviating results Explanations to histograms with accepted and deviating results 4 result without remark false negative result outlier average without deviating results

Contents Abbreviations and explanations... 2 Contents... General information on results evaluation... 4 Results of the PT round... 4 - General outcome... 4 - Coliform bacteria (MF)... - Suspected thermotolerant coliform bacteria (MF)... 8 - Escherichia coli (MF)... - Coliform bacteria and E. coli (rapid method, MPN)... - Intestinal enterococci (MF)... 14 - Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MF)... 1 - Culturable microorganisms 22 C, days... 18 - Culturable microorganisms C, 2 days... 2 Outcome of the results and laboratory assessment... 22 - General information about reported results... 22 - Base for assessment of the performance... 22 - Mixed up results and other practical errors... 22 - z-scores, box plots and deviating results for each laboratory... 22 Test material, quality control and processing of data... 27 - Description of the test material... 27 - Quality control of the test material... 28 - Processing of numerical results... 2 References... Annex A All reported results... 2 Annex B Z-scores of the results... Annex C Photo example of colony appearance on some media... 4

General information on results evaluation The histograms and calculation of outliers are described on page 2 under "Processing of numerical results" with further reference to the scheme protocol (1). The proficiency testing program organised by the National Food Agency is accredited against EN ISO/IEC 174. This standard prescribes that results should be grouped based on the method used. Therefore it is mandatory for participants to inform about method data. Method data where differences are present or could be expected are here reported for each parameter. The method information gathered is sometimes difficult to interpret. Sometimes there is no consistency between the standard referred to and the information given regarding various method details. Results from laboratories with ambiguous details are either excluded or placed in the group "Other/Unknown" in the tables, together with results from methods used only by individual laboratories. To obtain an as appropriate evaluation as possible, it is important that correct information details are reported. Outliers and false results are not included in the calculation of mean value and measure of dispersion for the various method groups. The numbers of low and high outliers, as well as false results, are instead explicitly given in tables together with the group means etc. The measure of dispersion and mean value are not shown for groups with 4 or fewer results, more than exceptionally where this is mentioned. However, when possible all results are shown in the method histograms. Results of the PT round General outcome Test items were sent to 17 laboratories, 7 in Sweden, 58 in other Nordic countries (Faeroe Islands, Greenland and Åland included), 4 more from EU, from the rest of Europe and 5 from countries outside Europe. Results were reported from 1 laboratories. The percentages of false results and outliers are compiled in table 1. These deviating results are excluded in most calculations. Microorganisms and parameters of analyses are also compiled in table 1. For the MF analyses the parameters suspected coliform bacteria and thermotolerant coliform bacteria (shaded in table 1 and table ), as well as suspected intestinal enterococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on primary media could be reported as well. The results from suspected colonies are only used for interpretations and discussions. All reported results are compiled in annex A and results for each laboratory are also shown on our website after logging in (www2.slv.se/absint). Standardized z-scores for all evaluated results are given in annex B and photographs with examples of colony appearance on various media are presented in annex C. 4 PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

Table 1 Microorganisms in each mixture and percentages of deviating results (F%: false positive or false negative, X%: outliers); parameters with grey rows are not assessed Mixture A B C Percentage of laboratories with deviating results 1 deviating result 2 deviating results >2 deviating results 1% 2% 1% 87% 11% 4% % 85% % 1% 1% 8% No. of evaluable results 588 51 58 No. of deviating results * 27 (5 %) 2 (4 %) (2 %) Microorganisms Escherichia coli Klebsiella oxytoca Enterococcus faecium Pseudomonas aeruginosa Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Enterobacter cloacae Cronobacter sakazakii Enterococcus hirae Staphylococcus capitis Escherichia coli (weak β- glu) Aeromonas hydrophila Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pseudomonas fluorescens Analysis Target org. F% X% Target org. F% X% Target org. F% X% Coliform bacteria E. coli 1 E. cloacae E. coli 1 (MF) K. oxytoca C. sakazakii [A. hydrophila] Susp. thermotolerant E. coli [E. cloacae] E. coli coliform bact. (MF) [C. sakazakii] E. coli (MF) E. coli 4 [E. cloacae] 2 {E. coli} # 4 Coliform bacteria (rapid method) E. coli K. oxytoca [C. sakazakii] E. cloacae C. sakazakii E. coli E. coli (rapid meth.) E. coli 1 1 Intestinal enterococci E. faecium 5 E. hirae (MF) Pseudomonas P. aeruginosa P. aeruginosa 4 aeruginosa (MF) Culturable microorganisms 22 C S. maltophilia 2 E. hirae 2 P. fluorescens (total (E. faecium) E. cloacae (P. aeruginosa) count), days (E. coli) C. sakazakii (A. hydrophila) (K. oxytoca) (E. coli) (P. aeruginosa) Culturable microorganisms (total count), 2 days C S. maltophilia (E. faecium) (E. coli) (K. oxytoca) (P. aeruginosa) 2 S. capitis (E. hirae) (E. cloacae) (C. sakazakii) * In total 1 of 1 laboratories (2 %) reported at least one deviating result Organism missing or numerical result irrelevant ( ) The organism contributes with only very few colonies [ ] The organism is false positive on the primary growth medium { } The organism may give different results depending on method or definition used # There were 21 zero results (2 %) not treated as erroneous results 1 (P. aeruginosa) (A. hydrophila) (E. coli) 5 PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21 5

Coliform bacteria (MF) In three cases the primary medium reported was not the one prescribed in the standard referred to. In these cases the reported medium is assumed to be correct. The medium Endo Agar reported by some participants is here included in m-endo Agar LES (LES). CCA are used in a higher degree than in the previous rounds, due to the fact that the standard EN ISO 8-1:214 has been more used. Fewer laboratories have used Medium N A B C n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > Total 81 7 1 2 1 78 177 2 2 77 28 1 1 1 1 m-endo Agar LES 55 54 74 2 5 18 21 1 5 2 1 1 Lactose TTC Agar 2 24 2 1 5 24 7 1 Chromocult C Agar 17 17 2 22 17 148 25 17 25 1 Other/Unknown 2 2 1 2 1 A Coliform bacteria 5//7 C (MF) 1 WIthout remark False negative Outlier A Coliform bacteria 5//7 C (MF) 1 m-endo Agar LES Lactose TTC Agar Chromocult Coliform Agar Other/Unknown 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml B 177 Coliform bacteria 5//7 C (MF) B 177 Coliform bacteria 5//7 C (MF) 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml C 2 1 Coliform bacteria 5//7 C (MF) 28 C 2 1 Coliform bacteria 5//7 C (MF) 28 8 8 4 4 * 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml * 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

LTTC while the use of LES has about the same frequency as before. There is an indication that LES gave somewhat higher mean result than average in all mixtures. CCA is low in all the mixtures while there is a variation for LTTC. The relative dispersion (CV) varies between both media and mixtures, but is clearly the lowest for all media in mixture C. Mixture A - Two strains of coliform bacteria were included in the mixture. Both E. coli and K. oxytoca grow with typical colonies, with a metallic sheen on LES, light to dark yellow on LTTC and bluish and pink, respectively, on CCA at 7 C (see annex C). There was no general problem with this analysis. - Due to the unexplained tail of results lower than the main peak in the histogram, the average is quite a bit lower than for coliform bacteria with the rapid methods (see page 14). However, the main peak has about the same location and distribution. The methods histogram indicates that the lower results predominantly are from LTTC and CCA. Mixture B - Two strains of coliform bacteria were included in the mixture. Both E. cloacae and C. sakazakii grow with typical colonies, with a metallic sheen on LES and light yellow to yellow on LTTC and pink or pink with a pink zone on CCA at 7 C. The analysis was without problem. - The average recovery is somewhat lower for the MF methods compared to the rapid methods (see page 14). Mixture C - A strain of E. coli was the only coliform bacterium. It grows with for coliform bacteria typical colonies on the MF media, a metallic sheen on LES, yellow on LTTC and dark pink to violet on CCA at 7 C. There was no problem with this analysis. - One false negative result and one low and one high outlier were present. The rest of the results were well distributed. - A strain of A. hydrophila was also included in the mixture. It usually grows with for coliform bacteria more or less typical colonies on the used media. A. hydrophila is oxidase positive and the colonies can be excluded as coliform bacteria after confirmation by the oxidase test (see below). - The average number of coliform bacteria in this analysis was identical to that for the rapid methods (page 14). This might seem unexpected as the MF methods usually give somewhat lower average. A probable explanation is that some laboratories have included A. hydrophila in the results for the MF method, thus compensating for the expected difference between the methods. - The results for suspected coliform bacteria and coliform bacteria are equal for out of the 57 laboratories. For the remaining 27 cases, the results for suspected coliform bacteria are higher, indicating that A. hydrophila has been excluded there after confirmation. PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21 7

Suspected thermotolerant coliform bacteria (MF) N.B.! By a mistake this parameter was given as Thermotolerant coliform bacteria on the website before and during this round, but the results will still be treated as usual; i.e. confirmation is not a prerequisite (suspected colonies are enough). The growth medium mainly used is m-fc and only partly LTTC. The incubation temperature was 44 or 44.5 C. Here, results were separated based on the method Standard, Method N A B C n Med CV F < > n Med CV F < > n Med CV F < > Total 8 21 5 24 EN ISO 8-1 4 4 145 4 47 4 4 SS 2817 11 28 2 SFS 488 1 1 1 1 2 2 NS 472 5 5 5 5 2 Other/Unknown 2 2 2 2 A Suspected thermotolerant coliform bacteria 44/44.5 C (MF) 1 (Median) 8 4 A Suspected thermotolerant coliform bacteria 44/44.5 C (MF) 1 8 4 (Median) EN ISO 8-1:2 SS 2817 SFS 488 NS 472 Other/Unknown 2 2 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml B Suspected thermotolerant coliform bacteria 44/44.5 C (MF) 1,5 (Median) B Suspected thermotolerant coliform bacteria 44/44.5 C (MF) 1,5 (Median) Zero results 25 5 75 1 5 175 2 225 25 No. of colonies per 1 ml 25 5 75 1 5 175 2 225 25 No. of colonies per 1 ml C Suspected thermotolerant coliform bacteria 44/44.5 C (MF) 1 24 (Median) 8 C Suspected thermotolerant coliform bacteria 44/44.5 C (MF) 1 24 (Median) 8 4 4 2 2 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml 8 PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

standards most commonly used, to get a further division beyond the media. They are EN ISO 8-1:2 with LTTC and three standards with m-fc from the Nordic countries, namely SS 2817 from Sweden, SFS 488 from Finland and NS 472 from Norway. The methods were sometimes used slightly modified. The average from EN ISO 8-1:2 is given as comparison, although only 4 results were present. The table shows the medians instead of mean values because no outliers have been identified. The reason is that the analysis is not included in performance assessment. The Swedish standard states incubation at 44 C but one laboratory reported 44.5 C. The temperature 44 C is also stated in EN ISO 8-1:2. The Norwegian standard, NS 472, states 44.5 C for incubation. Two of six laboratories using that standard have this time incubated at 44 C, the rest at 44.5 C. All laboratories using Finnish standard has incubated at 44 C, according to the standard. Among the groups compared, the one for NS 472, and thus perhaps indirectly the temperature 44.5 C, has lowest average in all mixtures. In mixture B, three of five results for that standard were zero. Mixture A - The strain of E. coli appears with blue colonies on m-fc at 44/44.5 C. The corresponding colonies are yellow on LTTC. Only 4 results were present for LTTC, making it difficult to compare them with m-fc. Mixture B - No genuine thermotolerant coliform bacterium was present. However, there was a strain of E. cloacae that sometimes grow as a (suspected) thermotolerant coliform bacterium on both m-fc and LTTC. Correspondingly the strain of C. sakazakii usually grows at 44 C with blue-grey to brownish colonies. These colonies are light yellow on LTTC. - Eleven laboratories have reported zero cfu per 1 ml. Mixture C - The strain of E. coli appears with blue colonies on m-fc at 44/44.5 C. The corresponding colonies are dark yellow on LTTC. - No zero results were obtained. Escherichia coli (MF) No confirmation is necessary to identify and quantify E. coli from CCA but from the other media, either incubated at ±2 C or at 44/44.5 C, confirmation must be done. Depending on the method, test of either indole production or β-glucuronidase activity or both is used as necessary confirmation. The primary growth media LTTC, LES and CCA are used at ±2 C and LTTC or m-fc at 44/44.5 C. Each result for E. coli can only come from one of these mediatemperature combinations. However, for about half of the laboratories it is not clear PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

what the primary temperature for the given results has been. Figures for where the temperature is unambiguous are given in two separate tables. The 42 results with unclear incubation temperature are not shown separately but are included only in the table "All results". Depending on the low number of total results, several groups contain less than 5 results. Just as indication, the averages are given also for these. Such averages should, however, not be compared or discussed individually. Since almost half of the results could not be connected to method although they belong to either temperature evaluation of differences between method groups within the respective temperature is of limited value. A tendency could, however, be that LES gives higher average than LTTC and CCA at ±2 C. At the high temperature there is no such tendency. Mixture A - One typical E. coli strain was included together with another coliform bacterium (K. oxytoca). With CCA β-glucuronidase activity is checked directly on the plate, no more confirmation is needed. For the other media confirmation is necessary. - Three false negative results were present. All results Medium N A B C n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > Total 8 7 184 28 8 2 58 28 # # # 2 1 ±2 C Medium N A B C n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > Total 2 21 2 1 22 28 # 14 # # m-endo Agar LES 1 1 24 2 1 1 28 14 Lactose TTC Agar 4 1 1 4 2 25 Chromocult C Agar 7 7 14 7 4 2 Other/Unknown 44/44.5 C Medium/Standard N A B C n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > Total 11 11 28 11 1 1 1 Medium m-fc Agar 7 7 4 7 7 27 11 Lactose TTC Agar 18 1 48 1 1 Other/Unknown 1 1 1 1 1 41 Standard EN ISO 8-1 8 2 44 1 SS 2817 SFS 488 2 2 2 2 2 5 NS 472 17 24 Other/Unknown 148 2 25 1 # Calculated without the 21 zero results 1 PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

A 184 Escherichia coli (MF) A Escherichia coli 5//7 C (MF) 21 m-endo Agar LES Lactose TTC Agar Chromocult Coliform Agar 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml A 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml Escherichia coli 44/44,5 C (MF) m-fc Agar Lactose TTC Agar Other/Unknown 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml C 25 2 Escherichia coli (MF) Zero results 28 C Escherichia coli 5//7 C (MF) 28 1 Zero results 5 * 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml C 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml Escherichia coli 44/44,5 C (MF) 1 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml Mixture B - No E. coli was included in the mixture but two false positive results were obtained. Mixture C - One strain of E. coli with weak β-glucuronidase activity was present in the mixture, resulting in varying outcome on different primary media. PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21 11

- Twenty one zero results were reported together with 1 results where presence of E. coli were reported. The zero results probably originate from media where test of β-glucuronidase activity has been decisive, since the strain is indole positive. Of the laboratories that have used XX-EN ISO 8-1:214 and the medium CCA or corresponding 1 reported a zero result (only pink colonies), while 5 reported higher results (blue to violet colonies present). - The other 11 zero results are from different methods from different countries. The most probable is that test of β-glucuronidase activity has been used as confirmation, e.g. test in broth with MUG reagent, and that the fluorescence has been interpreted as negative. A weak enzyme activity is present and the incubation time before reading is crucial for the interpretation of the outcome. In our tests with the strain, the outcome is weakly positive but it is necessary to compare with a clearly positive and negative strain to state the result. - The same average result was obtained as with the rapid method, 28 cfu per 1 ml, with the zero results excluded. - The low result 1 and 2 cfu per 1 ml, respectively, are outliers when the zero results are separately handled. One high outlier was also present. The distribution of accepted results looks good and has small dispersion. Coliform bacteria & E. coli (rapid methods, MPN) The rapid methods used for both these parameters were almost exclusively Colilert Quanti-Tray from the manufacturer IDEXX Inc. with incubation at either 5, or 7 C. Out of the about 7 laboratories that reported Colilert some used trays with 51 wells, while others used trays with 7 wells (a few of which, probably incorrectly, have reported wells). The laboratories often analysed both diluted and undiluted samples. Three laboratories stated the use of "Colilert 24 hours". One laboratory, has wrongly reported coliform bacteria from an ordinary fermentation MPN technique. Coliform bacteria, Rapid method with MPN Principle N A B C n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > Total, Rapid meth. 8 45 1 24 17 8 28 1 Colilert-18, 51 wells 18 1 42 1 1 24 14 18 27 1 Colilert-18, 7 wells 45 45 42 11 45 25 18 45 27 1 Colilert-18, 51 & 7 1 1 1 1 Colilert-24,? wells Wrong method 1 1 2 1 5 1 4 E. coli, Rapid method with MPN Principle N A B C n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > Total, Rapid meth. 8 7 11 11 1 7 1 5 2 Colilert-18, 51 wells 1 1 12 11 1 1 Colilert-18, 7 wells 45 44 18 11 1 44 1 42 2 Colilert-18, 51 & 7 1 1 1 1 Colilert-24,? wells PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

For coliform bacteria in all mixtures and E. coli in mixture A there was this time, in contrast to in many previous rounds, no clear tendency that the trays with 51 wells give somewhat lower average recovery than trays with 7 wells. Only for coliform bacteria in mixture A such a difference could be assumed. No outliers are seen in any of the analyses for coliform bacteria. Individual false results were obtained in the mixtures for the analyses of E. coli. A Coliform bacteria (rapid method, MPN) 45 A Coliform bacteria (rapid method, MPN) 45 Colilert-18, 51 wells Colilert-18, 7 wells Colilert-18, 51 & 7 Colilert-24 Wrong method 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 MPN-index per 1 ml 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 MPN-index per 1 ml A Escherichia coli (rapid method, MPN) 11 A Escherichia coli (rapid method, MPN) 11 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 MPN-index per 1 ml 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 MPN-index per 1 ml B Coliform bacteria (rapid method, MPN) 24 B Coliform bacteria (rapid method, MPN) 24 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 MPN-index per 1 ml 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 MPN-index per 1 ml C Coliform bacteria (rapid method, MPN) 28 C Coliform bacteria (rapid method, MPN) 28 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 MPN-index per 1 ml 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 MPN-index per 1 ml PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21 1

Mixture A - The strains of E. coli and K. oxytoca grow and possess β-galactosidase. They are thus detected as coliform bacteria by methods based on the activity of this enzyme (ONPG positive), e.g. Colilert -18/24 Quanti-Tray where ONPG is a substrate. - The strain of E. coli possesses the enzyme β-glucuronidase and is also detected as E. coli. One false negative result was present. - The averages are here somewhat higher than for the MF methods in general. Mixture B - In this mixture the coliform bacteria E. cloacae and C. sakazakii were present. Both of them possess β-galactosidase but not β-glucuronidase and are thus detected as coliform bacteria but not as E. coli. - The average result is somewhat higher than for the MF methods for coliform bacteria. One false positive result was present. Mixture C - The strain of E. coli is here detected as coliform bacterium only. It possesses β- galactosidase but has only very weak activity of the enzyme β-glucuronidase, leading to negative outcome for E. coli within the stated incubation time. - The zero results for E. coli are here regarded as correct. The two none zero results are here instead regarded as false positives in relation to the others, based on an assumption of equivalent methods. - The average for coliform bacteria is the same as for the MF methods. Intestinal enterococci (MF) The method used for intestinal enterococci is almost exclusively EN ISO 78-2:2. Only in 4 cases have another method reference, like national standards, been stated, but in all cases m-enterococcus Agar (m-ent) has been used as primary medium. Fairly often, even when EN ISO 78-2:2 is stated, this medium is referred to as Slanetz & Bartley Agar in the comments field. In one laboratory Enterolert -DW has been used, in spite of not being an MF method. The reported temperature for incubation was always 5, or 7 C and confirmation was in all cases performed for the MF methods. It was in 78 % of the cases performed with Bile-esculin-azide agar (BEA Agar) as is stated in EN ISO 78-2:2 and in 17 % performed on Bile-esculin agar (BE Agar; without azide). Confirmation A B C N medium n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > Total 77 72 41 22 4 74 7 1 2 7 BEA Agar 5 54 42 2 4 57 81 1 1 58 BE Agar 1 1 8 2 4 1 1 Other/Unknown 4 4 4 4 Wrong method 1 1 2 1 5 1 14 PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

A Intestinal enterococci (MF) 41 A Intestinal enterococci (MF) 41 BEA Agar BE Agar Other Wrong method 45 75 15 No. of colonies per 1 ml 45 75 15 No. of colonies per 1 ml B Intestinal enterococci (MF) 7 B Intestinal enterococci (MF) 7 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml The temperature for confirmation was in % of the laboratories 44 C, in % less than 44 C and in 4 % 44.5 C. The method for intestinal enterococci is not different for the vast majority of the 77 results obtained. Differences in the method are, therefore, most seen in the confirmation step. Both for mixture A and B the average recovery are somewhat lower when BE Agar was used compared to when BEA Agar were used..the "Wrong method" mentioned in the table is Enterolert -DW and is given for information. Mixture A - A strain of E. faecium was present in the mixture. The colonies of this strain are often light brown-red on m-ent and may give poor blackening in the confirmation step, in particular in the centre when there are plenty of colonies. A partly negative interpretation of results is the probable reason for the quite scattered distribution of the values with an over representation of low results. The dispersion of the results was medium, in this case the double of that in mixture B. - Four false negative results were present, but the other low results were not discerned as low outliers, because they were too many. - This strain has been found to give a low recovery on certain membrane filter batches. If this is experienced, the filters used should be compared with filter of another brand or batch. Mixture B - A strain of E. hirae was present in the mixture. The distribution of the results was good with low dispersion. The colour of the colonies is usually dark brown-red on m-ent and without any confirmation problems. PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

- Two low deviating results were obtained. Mixture C - No enterococcus strain was included and no false positive result was reported. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MF) The method used by the 57 laboratories reporting results was for 54 of them EN ISO 12:28 with or without modification. Some of the laboratories have reported the method by reference to the identical, since long time withdrawn, CEN standard EN 78:22, with or without modification. Incubation of the plates has in all cases been done at 5, or 7 C. In one case Pseudalert has been used. A medium consists usually of a base medium and one or more selective substances (supplements), like cetrimide (C) nalidixic acid (N) or Irgasan. The primary cultivation medium for P. aeruginosa is the same for the vast majority of the results, viz. Pseudomonas Agar base/cn-agar. In of 4 cases Pseudomonas Isolation agar was reported as primary medium together with OXOID, CM 55, which is Pseudomonas Agar base. Irgasan, that is a constituent of Pseudomonas Isolation agar, has not been stated but instead cetrimide, alone or in combination. Therefore, in these cases the medium used is assumed to be Pseudomonas Agar base/cn-agar. The medium Pseudomonas Cetrimide Agar with cetrimide only, reported in cases, is normally used with methods for other matrices than drinking water. Methods are usually stating 5 % higher concentration of cetrimide when used alone compared to when used together with nalidixic acid. Media with both substances has been claimed to giver higher recovery of P. aeruginosa than with higher cetrimide content alone. The various selective substances used are normally correlated to the medium stated but other combinations also seem to be used. For example, sometimes cetrimid or nalidixic acid alone is stated together with Pseudomonas Agar base/cn-agar even though the standard prescribes both. In the table results are compared based on selective substances irrespectively of which base medium that is used. At least for mixture A the laboratories using only cetrimide seem to have obtained the highest average, opposite to what could be expected. In mixture C the tendency is not equally clear. The average for the group of only results with nalidixic acid is also given as it supports the general picture of lower results when this substance was included. The "Wrong method" in the table is Pseudalert and is given for information. Method variant, A B C N supplement n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > Total 57 5 21 1 2 5 54 4 1 1 1 Cetrimide + Nalidixic acid 7 1 22 22 2 2 5 4 11 1 1 Cetrimide 14 247 11 1 14 5 Nalidixic acid 17 1 Other/Unknown 1 1 1 1 Wrong method 1 1 18 1 1 11 1 PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

A 21 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MF) A 21 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MF) Cetrimide + Nalidixic a. Cetrimide Nalidixic acid Other/Unknown Wrong method * 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml * 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml C Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MF) 4 C Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MF) 4 * 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml * 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per 1 ml Mixture A - One strain of P. aeruginosa with typical, blue-green colonies on PACN was included in the mixture. The colonies there also showed clear fluorescence under UV light. - The distribution of the results was somewhat scattered, but still had a small dispersion (CV). Two low and three high outliers were present. Mixture B - There was no P. aeruginosa in the mixture. No false positive result was reported. Mixture C - One strain of P. aeruginosa was included in the mixture. The colonies were not typical by having both a blue-green and a red-brown pigment on PACN, but they still showed clear fluorescence under UV light. The brownish colour was best visible from the reverse side of the plate, as well as in colonies transferred to an unselective medium. - Because of the blue green pigmentation and fluorescence on PACN, no confirmation of the colonies was needed according to the standard. - The distribution of the results was good and the dispersion small. One false negative result was present also here. PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21 17

Culturable microorganisms 22 C, days Ninety seven of the 11 laboratories performing the analysis reported EN ISO 222:1 as method, which prescribes the use of Yeast extract Agar. Six laboratories used Plate Count Agar (whereof one as Standard Methods Agar) together with EN ISO 222:1. Some others used Plate Count Agar together with national standards or "Standard methods" (5). Two laboratories used Nutrient Agar, of which one used spread plating together with EN ISO 222:1 and the other membrane filtration and "Nutrient pads". Seven more laboratories reported spread plating in combination with EN ISO 222:1. Comparisons of method variants are relevant to discuss only in connection to EN ISO 222:1. Results are given for culture media and magnification for reading. Thus, the 4 results for "Other method" are not shown in the method histograms. For mixture B the group averages are too low to see any differences. For mixture C there are no differences. For mixture A somewhat lower results were obtained without magnification than when magnification were used. Lower results in average were also obtained when PCA (erroneously?) was used on the basis of the standard EN ISO 222:1. In of these cases no magnification was used. Thus, it is not easy to state whether the magnification or the medium is the cause. Group of results N A B C n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > Total, all results 11 2 1 2 5 2 2 5 1 2 EN ISO 222 7 5 2 1 2 7 2 2 5 2 1 2 5 Medium Yeast extract Agar 88 2 2 84 7 2 2 4 85 1 1 5 Plate Count Agar 25 1 5 1 11 41 Other/Unknown 1 1 1 1 Magnification None 2 2 25 25 7 21 2 2 2 1 4 1,1 4, 2 11 1 2 17 1 1 14 2 5 11, 4 1 1 1 2 7 22 2 4 4 > 1 1 1 1 Other method 4 4 1 1 A 2 1 8 Culturable microorganisms 22±2 C, days 2 A 2 1 8 Culturable microorganisms 22±2 C, days 2 No magnification (1 ) Magnification 1,1-4, Magnification 5-11, Magnification > 4 4 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per ml 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per ml 18 PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

B 2 Culturable microorganisms 22±2 C, days 7 B 2 Culturable microorganisms 22±2 C, days 7 1 1 8 8 4 4 * 5 1 2 25 5 4 45 5 No. of colonies per ml 5 1 2 25 5 4 45 5 No. of colonies per ml C 2 1 Culturable microorganisms 22±2 C, days 1 C 2 1 Culturable microorganisms 22±2 C, days 1 8 8 4 4 5 1 2 25 5 4 45 5 No. of colonies per ml 5 1 2 25 5 4 45 5 No. of colonies per ml Mixture A - Mainly the strain of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia constitutes the culturable microorganisms. The other four bacteria can also grow but appear with very low numbers, viz. <1 cfu per ml. - The distribution was good except for 2 low outliers. The dispersion (CV) was small. Mixture B - The rather few colonies are made up of the coliform bacteria and E. hirae. - The distribution was good except for a tail with some high outliers and 2 false negative results. Due to the low concentration, the relative dispersion was medium in spite of the good distribution. - The six high outliers are probably caused by use of a higher temperature than 22 C. Colonies of the fourth bacteria, Staphylococcus capitis, might then be visible. This is what happens in the corresponding analysis at ±2 C. No other particular circumstance prevails for these high results. Mixture C - The colonies are almost entirely made up of Pseudomonas fluorescens. All other strains will also grow but only with low numbers. - The distribution is bad with unusually many low results. The strain of P. fluorescens is known to sometimes give quite scattered distribution, even though the colonies are not particularly small. - Due to the many low results it was impossible to discern any outliers. However, zero results were present, which here are judged as false negatives. PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21 1

Culturable microorganisms C, 2 days Almost all laboratories have stated the use of EN ISO 222:1. Two of the laboratories in the group "Other method" in the table have stated national standards and the third one Standard Methods (5). Seven laboratories have reported Plate Count Agar (whereof one as Standard Methods Agar) together with EN ISO 222:1, even though that standard states the use of Yeast extract Agar. One laboratory has reported Nutrient Agar together with EN ISO 222:1 (= "Other/ Unknown"). As for the analysis at 22 C, comparisons of method variants are relevant to discuss only when EN ISO 222:1 was used. Also here, the results are presented in relation to culture media and magnification for reading. The results with "Other method" are not shown in the method histograms. For mixture C with very few colonies, no tendencies can be seen. As for mixture A at 22 C, the average result for mixture B seems to be somewhat lower when Plate Count Agar were used compared to Yeast extract Agar. However, the same is here not valid for mixture A. No differences can be seen regarding the magnification. Group of results N A B C n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > n Mv CV F < > Total, all results 81 7 28 1 1 1 8 5 22 1 77 1 72 4 EN ISO 222 78 7 2 1 1 1 77 5 22 1 75 1 72 Medium Yeast extract Agar 7 8 2 14 1 1 2 1 7 1 7 Plate Count Agar 7 7 28 8 7 27 7 7 1 75 Other/Unknown 1 1 1 1 Magnification None 1 18 28 14 1 1 7 2 17 78 2 1,1 4, 5 5 28 1 5 21 4 1 7 1 5 11, 2 22 14 1 22 5 22 1 2 1 5 > 1 1 1 1 Other method 2 1 A 2 1 8 Culturable microorganisms ±2 C, 2 days 28 A 2 1 8 Culturable microorganisms ±2 C, 2 days 2 No magnification (1 ) Magnification 1,1-4, Magnification 5-11, Magnification > 4 4 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per ml 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per ml 2 PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

B 2 1 Culturable microorganisms ±2 C, 2 days 5 B 2 1 Culturable microorganisms ±2 C, 2 days 5 8 8 4 4 * 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per ml * 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 No. of colonies per ml C 4 Culturable microorganisms ±2 C, 2 days C 4 1 1 Culturable microorganisms ±2 C, 2 days 2 2 24 1 24 1 8 8 5 1 2 25 5 4 45 5 No. of colonies per ml 5 1 2 25 5 4 45 5 No. of colonies per ml Mixture A - Mainly the strain of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia constitutes the culturable microorganisms. The other four bacteria can also grow but appear with very low numbers, viz. <1 cfu per ml. - The distribution was good and the dispersion small and the same as for the corresponding analysis at 22 C. One low and 1 high outlier were present. Mixture B - All bacteria strains in the mixture appear at ±2 C and contribute to the total number of culturable microorganisms. The considerably higher average here compared to at 22 C is caused by the strain of S. capitis that grows at but not at 22 C and is present in highest concentration. - The distribution shows, as in the September round 2, unexpectedly many low results, which is unusual when S. capitis is used. The reason for these low results is not clear. This time no low results could be identified as outliers, leading to medium dispersion which is higher than usually. Mixture C - The few colonies originate from the other three strains except the strain of P. fluorescens that doesn't grow at ±2 C. - Due to the very low average, also a zero result is appropriate and acceptable. - The distribution was good except for 4 high outliers. The relative dispersion is very large due to the very low average concentration. PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21 21

Outcome of the results and laboratory assessment General information about reported results The distributions of results for the respective analysis are shown in histograms. A box plot (see below) gives a summarizing image of all the results of a laboratory, except false results. The number of false results and outliers are given below the plot for each laboratory. These values are highlighted with bold text on yellow background in annex A. The limit values for lowest and highest accepted results are given for each analyse in the summarizing lines at the end of annex A, together with the measurement uncertainty of the mean. Base for assessment of the performance The laboratories are not grouped or ranked in relation to their performances. The assessment is basically a clear indication of the numbers of false results and outliers given beneath the box plots. Generally, the laboratories that did not report their results in due time, have to compare their results themselves with all other laboratory's by looking in tables, figures and annex A. Mixed up results and other practical errors When whole samples seem to have been mixed up, the corresponding sample numbers are hatched in annex A. One laboratory (111) seems to have mixed up the vials for mixture A and B but no laboratory seems to have mixed up sample/results for individual analyses. No laboratory seems to have calculated the results for another volume than asked for. z-scores, box plots and deviating results for each laboratory The square-root transformed results of the laboratories are calculated to standard scores, z-scores, to be comparable between analyses. They are shown in annex B but not further evaluated. They are given explicitly to facilitate the follow-up process for laboratories using z-scores in control charts etc. For interpretation and calculation of z-scores, see the scheme protocol (1) and the explanation to annex A. The z-scores are the base for the box plots. The range of the z-scores for each laboratory is shown by a rectangle (box) and lines and/or circles above and beneath the box. The smaller the range from lowest to highest value is in the plot and the more centred around zero the values are, the better is the agreement between the laboratory's results and the means from all laboratories. 22 PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

Box plots and numbers of deviating results for each participating laboratory - z-scores are calculated from the formula z = (x mv) / s (see annex A). - False results do not generate z-scores and are not included in. - The outliers are included in the plots after recalculation to standardised values with the same standard deviation (s) as the rest of the results. - z-scores > +4 and < 4 have in the plots been set to +4 and 4, respectively. - The numbers of false positives and false negatives are given in the table under the plots together with the numbers of outliers. - The horizontal red line in each box indicates the median for the laboratory. - The box includes 25 % of the results above and below the median. The lines protruding from the box and/or the circles embrace the remaining 5 % of the results. - A circle is pure technically shown when a result is to a certain degree deviating* from the rest. This alone does not mean it is an outlier. - The background is divided into coloured fields in order to simplify localization of the laboratory results. * < [smallest value of the box - 1.5 (largest value of the box - smallest value of the box)] or > [largest value of the box + 1.5 (largest value of the box - smallest value of the box)] 4 2 z-score -2-4 Lab no. 111 112 7 54 45 4 111 175 188 17 25 28 254 27 27 274 2745 2 55 7 11 21 2 24 24 24 2 17 18 24 17 11 14 21 14 1 False positive 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - False negative 2-2 1 - - - - - - - - 1-1 - - - 2 - Low outliers 1 - - - - - - - 1 - - - 1 - - - - - - - High outliers - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2-1 - - 1 False negative? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RSZ -1, -1,2 -,1,5 -,82,24,25 2,7,1-1,4,52 -,8-1,71 1,1,1 -,, -,52,14,1 PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21 2

4 2 z-score -2-4 Lab no. 145 12 5 5 587 7 88 4 418 4288 41 4 44 45 445 454 4 472 21 24 24 17 24 17 18 21 24 24 24 2 18 18 False positive - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - False negative - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Low outliers - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - High outliers - - - 1 - - - - 1 - - - - 1 2 - - - - - False negative? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RSZ 1,25,1,78 2,4,,18 -,7 -,7 2, 1,5 -,51 -,5,8 1, 4,17 1, -, -, -,,1 SD,4 1,4,71 1,24,,8,,5 1,21,55 1,4,8,2 1,28 2,57,,7,72,84,8 4 2 z-score -2-4 Lab no. 488 48 518 54 5 5188 521 552 5447 544 555 571 5858 55 175 18 2 25 45 5 2 24 22 24 5 18 4 8 17 24 11 24 18 18 24 False positive - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - False negative - - 1 - - - - - - 5 - - 1-1 - - - - - Low outliers - - - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - - - - - - High outliers - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - - - False negative? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RSZ,4 -,5 -,84-1, 1,71,55 -,7-2, 1,8 -,22-1,28-7,7-1, 1,1 1,7 2, 1,57-1,4 2,8 24 PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

4 2 z-score -2-4 Lab no. 8 852 7 711 7248 72 7 7442 754 75 788 77 7728 787 78 7 74 72 78 88 1 2 8 24 24 14 24 24 2 18 24 14 24 18 21 24 2 False positive - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - 1 False negative - - - 1 - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - 1 - - Low outliers - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - High outliers - - - 2 - - - - - - - 1 - - - - 1 - - - False negative? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RSZ,1-1, -1,48 2,47 -,7 1,5-1, -,8,1 -,82 -,1,72-1,7 1,5-1, -,4 -,2,1,4-1, SD,2 1,55,57,5,74, 2,1,82,78,4,88 1,52,7,,4,55 2,1,5,78,88 4 2 z-score -2-4 Lab no. 8252 82 82 88 845 85 858 82 828 8 8742 87 88 884 882 881 888 855 88 2 8 2 18 18 17 24 24 14 21 17 24 24-11 False positive - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - False negative - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Low outliers - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - High outliers - - - - - - - - - - - 1-1 - - - - - - False negative? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RSZ,7,, 2,78-1,25-1, 1,8,54 -,44,42,8 1,11-2,,17,8 -,5,87,7 - -1,7 PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21 25

4 2 z-score -2-4 Lab no. 4 441 524 7 8 24 1 2 24 2 18 False positive - - - - - - - False negative - - - - - - - Low outliers - - - 1 - - High outliers - - - - - - 1 False negative? - - - - - - - RSZ 1,88 -, -2,71,47 -,8 1,7,57 2 PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

Test material, quality controls and processing of data Description of the test material This round comprised three test items with different microorganism mixtures. The test material was manufactured and freeze-dried in portions of.5 ml in small vials, according to the description by Peterz and Steneryd (2). The simulated water samples were prepared by dissolving the content of the vials in 8 ml of sterile diluent. The composition and approximate concentrations in each mixture is listed in table 2. The participating laboratories were assigned to perform the analyses according to the methods routinely used by them. The test material is primarily adapted to the EN ISO methods for analyses of drinking water referred to in the European Drinking water directive (4) and its updates (). Alternative methods and other standards may usually also be used without any problem. Table 2 Microorganisms present in the mixtures Mixture 1 Microorganisms Strain collection no. cfu/1 ml 2 SLV (own) Reference A Escherichia coli CCUG 4 21 Klebsiella oxytoca 8 CCUG 42 2 Enterococcus faecium 45 CCUG 5172 58 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 45 CCUG 551 44 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 41 CCUG 457 2 * B Enterobacter cloacae 451 CCUG 25 17 Cronobacter sakazakii 41 Från vatten 5 Enterococcus hirae 5 CCUG 45 Staphylococcus capitis 4 CCUG 517 4 * C Escherichia coli 25 Från vatten 2 Aeromonas hydrophila 81 CCUG 451 Pseudomonas aeruginosa xxx 4 47 Pseudomonas fluorescens 55 CCUG 451 25 * 1 The links between the mixtures and the randomised sample numbers are shown in annex A; the analyses were performed at the times given in note 1 of table 2 cfu = colony forming units Origin or culture collection number; CCUG: Culture Collection University of Gothenburg, Sweden 4 Not yet included in the collection * Indicates cfu per ml PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21 27

Quality control of the test material It is essential to have a homogeneous mixture and a uniform volume in all vials in order to allow comparison of all freeze-dried samples derived from one mixture. The volume was checked by weighing 1 to 2 dispensed aliquots in vials of each mixture. The largest differences between vials were between and mg in the mixtures. The largest accepted difference is mg ( %). Table presents the results from the organizer in the form of concentration means (cfu) and the measures (I 2 and T; see reference 1) used to assess homogeneity from duplicate analyses of 1 vials from each mixture. The results relate to the volume that was used for counting the colonies. The criterion used for a mixture to be considered homogenous is that I 2 and T are not simultaneously higher than 2. According to that criterion, all mixtures were homogeneous regarding the assessed parameters that were about to be analysed. Table Contents (cfu) and measures of homogeneity (I 2 and T, see reference 1) in relevant sample volumes for the various parameters in the mixtures 1 Analysis parameter Mixture Method standard for analysis A B C 2 cfu I 2 T cfu I 2 T cfu I 2 T Coliform bacteria (MF) m-endo Agar LES according to SS 2817 5 a. 1. Suspected thermotolerant colif. bact. (MF) * m-fc Agar, 44 C according to SS 2817 17 a 1.2 1.7 Escherichia coli (MF) m-endo Agar LES according to SS 2817 21 a 1.4 1. Intestinal enterococci (MF) m-enterococcus Agar acc. to SS-EN ISO 78-2:2.7 1.2 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MF) 44 a Pseudomonas Agar base with cetrimide and nalidixic 1.1 1.4 acid according to SS-EN ISO 1288:28 Culturable microorg., 2d 7 C (pour plate) 44 Yeast extract Agar according to 1. 1.4 SS-EN ISO 222:1 Culturable microorg., d 22 C (pour plate) 42 Yeast extract Agar according to 1.4 1.5 SS-EN ISO 222:1 21 a 8. 1.5 4.1 1..8.8 24.7 1.4 a 1.2 1.4 4 2 1. 1.5.7 1..8 2.2 47 <1 2 1.2 1.4 b b.4 1.2 1 n=1 vials analysed in duplicate, normally1 ml for MF and 1 ml for pour plate, 22 and 14 weeks ahead of the testing round start for the mixtures A and B, respectively (for C, see note 2) 2 n=5 vials analysed in duplicate (stability test; 1 weeks before the start of testing for mixture C) a Determined for the volume 1 ml b Zero result in 4 of the 5 vials from the two analyses implies that no T or I 2 value can be calculated. * This parameter is not assessed; no genuine thermotolerant bacteria but only "false positives" were included this time, leading to the high I 2 and T values in mixture B No target organism and thus no analysis 28 PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

Processing of numerical results Most histograms have "tails" in either or both directions, due to values that do not belong to a normal distribution. Calculations are performed after square root transformations of the results that give better normal distributions by decreasing the significance of the high end "tails". Very deviating values are still present in most analyses and are identified as outliers (black bars). False negative results are presented with white bars in the histograms. Outliers are identified by use of Grubbs test according to a modification by Kelly (). A level of 1 % is set as the risk to incorrectly assess a result as being an outlier. Although the method is objective, there is a prerequisite that the results are normally distributed in order to obtain correct outliers at the 1 % level. A zero result that is a low outlier is considered a false negative result. In special situations, e.g. when many zero results are reported and in some borderline cases, a few subjective adjustments are made in order to set the right limits based on the knowledge of the mixture s content. False results and outliers are not included in the calculations of mean values and measures of distribution. The coefficient of variation (CV) for square root transformed results is given as a measure of dispersion. When the dispersion is <1 % it is regarded as very small, 1 2 % as small, 2 % as medium, 4 % as large and >4 % as very large. The calculation of uncertainty of measurement of the assigned value is described in the scheme protocol (1). The assigned value for an analysis is calculated from the square root transformed results and is the square root of "Mean" in Annex A. It is there denoted as mv. Hence, also the measurement uncertainty will be expressed as a square root value. The standard uncertainty of measurement (u) correspond to the standard deviation of the assigned value (s) divided by the number of results squaredroot transformed, i.e.: u = s/ n mv where n mv is the number of results in annex A, except the deviating ones. Here is the relative uncertainty (u rel ) used and expressed as per cent after division by the mean value mv and multiplication by 1. More about result processing and recommendations on follow-up work are given in the scheme protocol (1). A PDF of that document is available on the website www2.slv.se/absint. PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21 2

References 1. Anonymous 214. Scheme protocol, Microbiology, Drinking water & Food, rd ed. National Food Agency, Sweden. 2. Peterz, M., Steneryd, A.-C. 1. Freeze-dried mixed cultures as reference samples in quantitative and qualitative microbiological examinations of food. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 74:14-148.. Kelly, K. 1. Outlier detection in collaborative studies. J. Assoc. Off. Chem. 7:58-4. 4. Anonymous 18. Council Directive 8/8/EC of November 18 on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Official Journal of the European Communities. 5..8, L /2-54 (national translations available). 5. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, http://www.standardmethods.org/. Anonymous 2. Commission Directive (EU) 2/1787 of October 2 amending Annexes II and III to Council Directive 8/8/EC on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Official Journal of the European Union. 7.1.2, L 2/-17 (national translations available). PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21 1

Annex A Results of the participants. Susp. = suspected on membrane filter before confirmation. Results given as <1, <2, <1 and <1 are treated as zero. The fields with other results given as < 'value' and results given as > 'value' are yellow, and those results are not included in calculations or evaluations. This is also valid for results in shaded columns. A hyphen indicate that no result has been reported. Figures written in bold in yellow fields indicate outliers, false positive and false negative results. Underlined zero values indicate results characterized as 'False negative?'. Crossed out sample numbers in a row indicate that the samples probably are mixed up. False positive and false negative values Lab no. Sample Suspected coliform bacteria (MF) Coliform bacteria (MF) Susp. thermotolerant coliform bact. (MF) E. coli (MF) Coliform bacteria ("rapid" MPN) E. coli ("rapid" MPN) A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C 111 2 1 8 1 7 8 1 25 - - - <1 2 25 248 5 25 <1 172 <1 112 2 1 - - - - - - 111 2 111 2 87 5 2 17 7 2 1 - - - 41 255 28 - - - <1 <1 28 11 2 21 <1-54 1 2 4 18 2 4 18 2 - - - 18 2 44 1 2 45 1 2 4 1 4 1 18 22 1 24 22 18 425 22 25 28 4 2 1 45 22 28 45 22 28 1 8 24 21 28 454 25 184 111 2 1 48 1 4 48 1 2 2 2 2 87 228 24 2 175 1 2 57 21 51 57 21 24 - - - 18 411 2 2 188 2 1 4 1 24 4 1 24 - - - 48 25 45 244 17 1 2 41 1 45 7 1 25 41 8 45 25 - - - - - - 25 2 1 - - - 21 5 - - - 5 1 185 17 28 1 2 25 11 25 11 - - - 147 - - - - - - 254 2 1 545 17 1 545 17 1 - - - 28 <1 1 - - - - - - 27 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 21 2 22 <1 <1 27 1 2 11 2 11 2 11 2 11 2 - - - - - - 274 1 2 - - - 4 1 24 - - - 4 24 54 44 24 222 <1 <1 2745 1 2 8 11 5 8 11 5 1 5 8 5 - - - - - - 2 1 2 - - - 144 17 - - - 77 <1 <1 - - - - - - 55 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 145 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - 548 1 7 25 1 2 - - - 27 2 - - - 22 45 4. 4 <1 <1 12 2 1 4 2 2 4 2 2 - - - 1 2 517 27 17 1 5 1 2 - - - 28 28 - - - 28 478 22 12 2 1 41 2 41 2 - - - 17 - - - - - - 5 1 2 - - - 45 2 - - - 2 - - - - - - 587 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 1 2 27 - - - 17 - - - - - - - - - 88 2 1 4 25 25 4 25 25 7 1 2 1 41 1 1 4 2 1 5 2 42 42 2 22 - - - 211 5 5 25 15 418 2 1 - - - 28 4 25 - - - 11 25 - - - - - - 4288 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 41 2 1 475 245 58 42 245 1 1 28 22 27 42 2 221 4 1 2 - - - 4 24 1 25 <1 18 22 <1 1 488 1 28 145 <1 <1 44 2 1 44 1 44 1 - - - 182 488 145 21 45 1 2 5 2 471 2 17 2 25 2 488 24 21 445 2 1 - - - 2 141 17 - - - 2 2 1 21 118 454 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 1 2 - - - 4 11-17 - 2-55 11 22 24 472 2 1 4 1 2 4 1 2 - - - 1 2 727 5 2 228 488 2 1 - - - 5 2 2 - - - 1 4 1 2 1 48 1 2 44 5 8 1 5 2 2 24 24 42 4 1.2 12 <1 <1 518 2 1 4 18 4 8 18 27 - - - 22 548 14 28 214 54 2 1 - - - 54 21 25 8 2 48 8 48 - - - - - - 5 2 1 48 1 2 48 1 2 11 7 28 48 2 1 7 22 5188 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 42 1 25 2 521 2 1 25 114 2 - - - - - - 14 - - - - - - 552 1 2 2 12 45 21 12 78 21 2 78 <1 2 - - - - - - 5447 2 1 - - - 527 41 - - - 4 41 - - - - - - 544 2 1 - - - <1 <1 <1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 555 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 571 2 1 44 21 5 44 21 - - - 18 1 1 - - - - - - 5858 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 18 2 5 55 2 1 4 14 27 4 14 27 8 5 8 <1 41 21 2 248 <1 <1 175 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 2 2 2 18 2 1 4 24 55 4 24 55 17 2 22 55 1 2 25 2 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 47 218 1 11 <1 <1 25 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - 541 245 27 18 45 2 1 - - - 425 24 - - - 1 21 27 25 21 5 2 1 2 2 45 2 2 45 - - - 2 45 28 22 25 8 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - >2 >2 2.7 2.5 <1 <1 852 1 2 - - - - - - 1 <1 4 - - - 2 4.5 4 17 <1 <1 7 2 1 - - - 4 8 2 - - - 1 22 4 711 1 2 >25 17 25 1 1 1 - - - 1 1 - - - - - - 7248 1 2 441 1 22 441 1 22 5 48 1 1 22 45 178 185 72 1 2 445 7 445 25 18 27 27 <1 25 44 1 148 <1 <1 7 1 2 - - - - - - - - - 18 25 - - - - - - 7442 2 1 424 2 48 242 2 2 - - - 2 5 177 21 11 754 1 2 - - - 5 22 4 - - - 17 <1 25 - - - - - - 75 2 1 51 14 2 51 14 2 27 27 41 27 1 1 788 1 2 - - - 2 2 - - - 4 24 1 2 Mean 1 177 28 184 28 45 24 28 11 CV (%) 2 2 1 28-1 17 1 11 - - 2 PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

are excluded, as well as other outliers, in the summarizing calculated results at the end of the table. The mean value (Mean) is the square of the mean value for the square root transformed results (mv). The coefficient of variation (CV) is the standard deviation (s) in percentage of the mean value for the square root transformed results. As means to calculate the z-values of your own, the appropriate values of mv and s are given at the end of the table. The x-values are obtained as the square roots of the reported result, respectively. z = (x - mv) / s. u rel,mv is the relative standard uncertainty of mv in per cent. For calculation see the scheme protocol (1); also briefly described in the text. Susp. intestinal enterococci (MF) Intestinal enterococci (MF) Susp. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MF) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MF) Total plate count 22 C, days Total plate count ±2 C, 2 days Lab no. A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 1 - - - 111 5 5 5 5 - - - - - - 22 7 - - - 112 - - - <1 8 <1 - - - 12 <1 1 25 7 2 48 7 54 7 7 24 8 24 8 7 22 2 47 1 54 5 5 5 5 28 2 28 2 4 11 44 2 1 45 425 45 55 45 2 4 2 4 11 2 8 4 58 51 58 51 4 5 4 5 24 4 17 1 111 4 4 28 51 28 51 41 18 2 4 1 175 4 45 571 45 27 - - - 1 1 - - - 188 21 7 21 7 1 28 1 28 24 14 14 1 17 - - - 4 45 - - - 24 57 7 2 2 4 25 25 22 25 22 18 1 2 18 2 2 21 4 1 28 - - - - - - 7 <1 <1 - - - 7 <1 1 1 <1 254 4 7 <1 - - - - - - - - - 2 18 4 4 1 27 47 4 47 4 - - - - - - 2 14 25 42 14 27 - - - 4 <1 - - - - - - 2 2 274 - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 25 - - - 2745 - - - 44 28 <1 - - - - - - 2 1 44 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 55 - - - - - - 1 1 1 1 4 2 4 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 145 1 52 1 52 <1 - - - - - - 5 4 2 8 1 2 1 2 2 4 2 4 24 27 1 12 42 81 4 81 4 8 14 24 2 1 1 5 4 4 4 2 2 27 7 1 4 55 - - - 5 4 - - - - - - 24 1 - - - 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - 28 5 11 2 41 <1 587 - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 8 - - - 7 5 4 5 4 52 52 28 5 1 88 4 45 45 - - - - - - 8 2 - - - 4 - - - 58 285 - - - 7 17 14 1 14 8 1 418 - - - - - - - - - - - - 22 8 18 - - - 4288 45 45 - - - - - - 2 7 14 1 48 1 41 45 5 <1 1 5 <1 81 4 81 4 42 7 24 8 4 2 4 427 427 118 8 118 8 5 5 41 27 21 1 44 47 47 47 47 1 7 1 7 25 7 21 2 42 45 - - - - - - 2 2 24 4 2 2 4 445 - - - 4 47 - - - - - - 28 1 24 45 454 - - - - 18 - - - - - - 2 1 21 28 4 4 482 4 1 4 - - - - - - 4 1 - - - 472 - - - 42 4 - - - 1 25 2 1 4 2 488 54 4 54 4 <1 2 4 2 8 22 27 1 1 48 55 5 5 18 4 18 4 28 7 8 27 518 52 48 - - - - - - - - - 2 5 2 54 2 2 2 2 28 2 28 2 8 4 5 1 5 - - - 45 - - - 2 5 - - - - - - 5188 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 4 14 - - - 521 2 2 <1 25 2 25 <1 2 1 14 1 5 <1 552 - - - 7 - - - - - - 2 5 1 2 1 1 5447 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 <1 <1 4 5 <1 544 - - - 45 22 - - - - - - - - - - - - 555 - - - - - - - - - - - - 22 4 5 - - - 571 47 7 47 7 185 24 17 24 24 22 2 1 5858 44 <1 44 <1 245 <1 4 245 <1 4 4 1 45 47 1 55 - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 22 8 18 175 5 2 5 2 4 1 4 1 2 1 2 4 1 18 4 425 4 425 27 2 27 2 4 7 27 2 45 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 8 17 - - - 25 - - - - - - - - - - - - 27 5 17 2 2 1 45 4 45 4 45 18 18 1 2 24 7 5 - - - 44 <1 - - - - - - 2 4 1 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 <1 852 - - - 48 1 - - - 4 1 5 25 2 1 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 4 - - - 711 44 44 5 4 22 2 1 22 1 4 1 1 2 7248 5 7 <1 445 7 <1 <1 2 <1 2 1 41 48 1 72 - - - 4 28 - - - 4 - - - 25 42 1 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 7 14 - - - 7442 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 4 7 24 1 754 5 4 4 17 2 17 2 1 2 2 4 2 75 - - - 2 - - - 4 5 22 4 788 41 7 21 4 2 7 1 28 5 1 Mean 22 1-1 - 1 1 2 2 1 22 72 CV (%) PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

Lab no. Sample Suspected coliform bacteria (MF) Coliform bacteria (MF) Susp. thermotolerant coliform bact. (MF) E. coli (MF) Coliform bacteria ("rapid" MPN) E. coli ("rapid" MPN) A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C 77 2 1 - - - 4 1 - - - 45.2 142.1 2.2 14.7 2.2 7728 1 2 - - - 22 18 18 - - - 8 18 - - - - - - 787 2 1 82 7 4 82 7 48 8 18 21 17 <1 48 52 2 4 1 <1 <1 78 2 1 51 18 2 51 18 2 - - - <1 <1 41 1 2 21 <1 <1 7 1 2 25 24 25 24 - - - 18 24 222 22 21 74 1 2 278 2 1 11 5 - - - - - - 72 2 1 28 8 28 4 7 2 18 17 2 24 2 1 78 2 1 55 4 8 455 4 8 1 1 4 455 8 521 271 2 25 88 2 1 - - - 22 - - - 27 87 187 22 5 22 8252 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 57 27 24 <1 <1 82 2 1 1 27 1 27 - - - 1 <1 <1 - - - - - - 82 2 1 517 14 25 517 14 25 - - - 25 57 2 21 222 88 1 2 - - 1 - - 1 - - - - - 1 2 24 47 1 845 1 2 - - - 5 11 2 8 18 5 2 - - - - - - 85 1 2 7 18 41 2 18 2 2 2 - - - - - - 858 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 82 1 2 4 2 41 1 41 1 41 1 41 - - - - - - 828 1 2 - - - 1 2 2 5 <1 1 <1 <1 - - - - - - 8 2 1 4 1 22 4 1 22 1 41 1 1 22 41 21 2 18 8742 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 87 1 2 5 1 2 5 1 22 55 7 458 1 5 27 1 88 2 1 17 82 17 82 - - - 1 - - - - - - 884 2 1 4 28 25 4 28 25 - - - 27 25 48 27 4 24 882 2 1 5 145 5 5 145 22 - - - 2 8 24 144 881 2 1 4 14 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 888 1 2 48 2 25 48 2 25 - - - 1 25 5 214 21 1 855 1 2 - - - 4 22 8 2 22 41 28 17 88 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 1 2 - - - 2 2 - - - 5 - - - - - - 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 28 28 24 4 1 2 1 4 18 1 4 18 25 11 111 <1 18 25 24 14 <1 <1 441 2 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - >21 >21 1 1 <1 <1 524 1 2 1 1 1 1 25 - - - 2 <1 <1 45 272 24 21 <1 <1 7 2 1 4 7 1 4 7 - - - 1 42 27 4 1 8 2 1 5 2 42 5 2 24 - - - 185 44 45 185 1 2 5 258 55 5 258 2 188 14 28 188 28 - - - - - - n 5 57 57 8 8 8 5 82 82 82 8 8 8 7 Min 4 5 2 2 17 Max 2 2 25 2 4 1 41 1 5 2 2 1 727 24 4 172 2.2 Median 4 18 2 4 185 27 1.5 24 17 27.5 457.5 24 27 15 Mean 1 177 28 184 28 45 24 28 11 CV (%) 2 2 1 28-1 17 1 11 - - False positive 2 1 2 False negative 1 2 1 1 Outliers, low 1 2 Outliers, high 1 1 Low limit OK 4 5 44 21 17 2 1* 2 17 1 High limit OK 2 2 25 2 4 55 41 1 5 2 55 727 24 4 mv 18.5 1.287 5.25 1.575. 5.282 21.2.772 5.25 1.827.. ( Mean) s.84.82.74.814..784 2.8 2.87.75 1.52.. (CV*mv/1) u rel,mv (%) 2. 2. 1.5.2 1.7 1. 2.1 1. 1.4 (1*s/ n mv /mv) x ( Result) z ([x-mv]/s) * The calculated results and acceptance limits are calculated without the 21 zero results. However, these zero results are judged as acceptable and not false negatives. 4 PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

Susp. intestinal enterococci (MF) Intestinal enterococci (MF) Susp. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MF) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MF) Total plate count 22 C, days A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C Total plate count ±2 C, 2 days Lab no. - - - 54 54 - - - 17 2 4 2 52 77 - - - 45 4 - - - 24 1 28 5 2 42 1 7728 518 <1 518 <1 475 <1 218 <1 8 11 7 7 4 <1 787 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 5 - - - 78 5 4 5 4 25 8 25 8 5 28 2 1 7 488 41 48 41 4 4 4 4 14 42 1 2 5 1 74 55 2 27 2-28 2 51 1 72 54 5 2 5 24 4 24 4 42 8 11 8 4 2 78 - - 18 45 - - - 28 25 2 7 25 17 48 88 - - - 44 4 <1 2 <1 - - - 5 18 2 51 1 8252 - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 17 - - - 82 44 485 44 485 - - - 18 11 7 17 4 1 82-5 - - - 7 11 1 8 51 88 - - - - - - 18 2 24 4 8 28 45 845 5 48 5 48 - - - - - - 8 2 - - - 85 - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 11 25 - - - 858 - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 8 28 4 2 82 - - - 4 <1 - - - 17 <1 2 2 4 1 41 1 828 58 4 2 4 2 42 2 42 11 22 2 2 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 4 7 4 2 8742 514 1 24 1 145 145 27 7 1 4 42 1 87 14 2 14 2 - - - 4 17 1 88 42 4 42 4 - - - - - - 1 2 4 45 7 884 482 47 7 47 - - - - - - 5 8 - - - 882 - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 5 - - - 881 5 5 27 8 27 8 7 2 42 2 888 4 7 4 - - - 1 27 1 14 2 855 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 88 - - - 25 - - - - - - 2 8 18 - - - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 8 24 1 482 45 <1 18 45 <1 24 5 8 <1 2 4 1 8 24 1 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 2 441 2 5 <1 2 5 <1 - - - - - - 25 5 18 25 14 4 524 54 54 2 2 2 2 2 1 25 41 7 2 42 2 42 22 21 2 24 45 1 8 58 4 5 4 5 5 7 41 25 27 2 55 54 5 7 7 7 4 44 44 55 5 5 11 11 11 81 81 81 n 55 45 28 8 2 7 8 2 Min 1 52 54 22 1 145 1 42 5 41 21 18 Max 5 4 455 25 4 224 4 2 7 14 2 4 1 Median 41 7 21 4 2 7 1 28 5 1 Mean 22 1-1 - 1 1 2 2 1 22 72 CV (%) False pos. 4 2 False neg. 2 2 1 2 1 Outliers < 1 1 1 4 Outliers > 55 45 22 4 11 2 1 2 Low limit 1 52 54 22 1 4 57 42 1 41 45 4 High limit 2.74 1.4. 14.11. 5.8 5.77 2.4.54 5.4 5.5.785 mv 4.5 1.7. 2.728..785.75.525 1.175.78 1.25.5 s 2. 1.2 2. 1.8 1. 2.1. 1.5 2.5 8. u rel,mv (%) x z PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21 5

Annex B z-scores calculated from the laboratory results. Susp. = Suspected on the membrane filters before confirmation. z = (x - mv) / s. z-scores are calculated also for outliers (excluding false negative results) in the same way as ordinary z-scores. From false Lab no. Sample Suspected coliform bacteria (MF) Coliform bacteria (MF) Susp. thermotolerant coliform bact. (MF) E. coli (MF) Coliform bacteria ("rapid" MPN) E. coli ("rapid" MPN) A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C 111-2. 1.42 -.81 -.5-2.8 1.241 -.. 112 -.77. -1.2 -.575 1.241-1.174 -.2.. 7.2.87.52..1 -.547-1. -1.174.44. 54.8.42.55 -.42..47 -.8-1. -1.42.2.. 45.21 -.27-1.55.. -1.25 -.22.4 -..8.. 4.484.52.52.24..1.5..14 -.172.. 111.758.11 -.84 1.11. -.2 -.575 -.25 -.542 1.4.. 175 1.27.1 -.51.45.. 1.8 1.75.178.875.. 188.5.11 -.51 -.48...1.85 2.17 1.17.. 17. -.27 -.81 1.24. -.5 25 -..458.7 -.87..8 -.82 -.88.14 -.7.. 28 -.828 -.8.28 -.8.. 254 1.12 -.4.42.828..5 27 -.42 -.477.58.57.. 27-2.14 -.24 -.. -.2 274 -.145-1. -.51 1.275. -.488.4 1. -.542.71.. 2745.1 -.8 2.4 1.552. 2.282 2-1.82-2.54-1.8-1.25.. 55 7 145.818.7 1.21.21.. -.7-1.2 -.84 -.87. -.754.2.41 1.8-1.7.. 12.21 1.214.11 -.24..12.58.1-1.1 -.17.. 5.1 1.118.52 -.285..1.242 -.5 1.88.1...2.21.28 -.141.. 5.577 -.7-1. 1.4. -1.2 587 7 88.21.81 -.81.14. -2.7 1.8 1..448 -.28.. 4.447.1 -.84.24.. 1.12 1.241 -.... 418 -.58-1. -.81 -.8. -.5 4288 41.428.78.42.85. -.1..57 -.24.7.. 4.45.71-1... -1.177.27-1.75. -1.18.. 44.2 -.527.28 -.22..24.27-1.88.71.22.. 45.74 1.42.55.7..47.27..71.22.. 445-1.75 -.458-1.8 -.27.. -1.87-1.12-1.11-1... 454 4.41.17.8..714 -.72 -.851 1.2.. 472.41 -.527.11...12 2.14 1.241-1.174.82.. 488 -.75 1.214-1. -.57...4.8 -.24 -.28.. 48-1.51-2.17.11-1.72. -.488 -.187 1.21-1.8.1.. 518.4 -. -. 1.14...818 -.8..524.. 54 1.14.1 -.81 -.5. 2.1 5.758.11.11 2.185..12 1.28 1.28 -.851 2.87.. 5188 -.2.8 -..2.. 521 -.457.. 552-1.172 -.181 1.14-1.244. -.2 5447 1.1 1. 1.7 1.. 1.4 544 555 571 -.21-2.824-4. -2.447-4. 5858 -.45 -.85-1.174 -.1.. 55.41 -. -. -.5..24..14.178 1.25.. 175-2. -.7-1.174.2.. 18.8.71.27 1.14. 2.722 1.8.8.178 1.28.. 2.1 -.75.448 -.745.. 25.72 -.44 -. -.4.. 45.422 -.14 -.51 -.1. -1.177-2.2 -.5 -..22.. 5 1.5.4 2. 2.. 1.81 1.28.555 -.851 1.28.. 8-1.5.218.. 852-2.255-2.252 2.5-1.88.. 7 -.145-1.55 -.24 -.24.. -.85 -.5.88 -.42.. 711-2.4-1. 4. -.7. 4. 7248.522 -.24 -.84 -.7. -.754 -.1 -.4.14 -.148.. 72.54 1. -.81.5. -.5.2.1 1.88-1.87.. 7 -.11. -.5 7442 -.85.42.55..47 -.78 -.18-1.11-2.184.. 754.87.52 1.58 -.141. -.5 75.4 -.472.55 -.87. -.1..1-1.42.18.. 788 -..278 1.14 -.87..1.4 -.14.448 1.52.. 77 -.145-1..725 -.48..5 -.12-1.4.25-1.2. 7728-1.8.42-1.55-1.214. -1.25 787.14 -.55 2.482 -.111. 2.1.52.51.88 -... 78.4.42-1. -.48.. -. -.74.178.44.. 7.1. -.51 -.42. -.488 -.85 -.25 -.851.44.. 74 -. -.757.28 -.87..24 72 -.21 1.118.85 -.141.. -1.178. -.24 -.77.. 78.8 1.72 1.48 2.. 1...257 -.24.8.. 88.5.52.28.77..24 -.575 -.78 -.851 -.1. 8252.1-1. -. 1.8.. 82 -. -.48 -..8.. 82.74 -.472 -.81.58.. 1.1 -.11-1.11.71.. 88.42.5 1..427 2.55-1.51.. PT Microbiologi Drinking water, September 21

positive results can no z-scores be calculated. z-scores from outliers are not real z- scores but a practical means to express also the results from the outliers. Very low and high values are here limited to 4 and +4, respectively. Susp. intestinal Intestinal enterococci Susp. Pseudomonas Pseudomonas Total plate count Total plate count Lab no. enterococci (MF) (MF) aeruginosa (MF) aeruginosa (MF) 22 C, days ±2 C, 2 days A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C -.77.41 -.12 111.74 -.5. -1.17.8-1. 112.4. -.27. -2.2 -.55.8.72.22.77 1. 7 -.85..2..42.148.8.88 -.2.718.78 54.48 -.5..778. -.57 1.44-1. -.287 1.85 -..78 45 -.4...24..1.545 1.57-1..45.1-1.81 4.71 1.. 1.7. 2.17 -.78-1. -.12-1.71-2.1.78 111 1..77..778. 1.71 1.52 -.24.51.45.2.78 175.7-4...2 1.7. 188-1.5 -.85. -1.17. -.8 -.78-1..75.22-1..78 17.2...2. 2.12 1.4 -.24.72 -.7 -.5-1.81 25-1.5-2.21. -.48. -.221 -.81 -.24.71.4.827.78 28-4. -.24-2.441 -.255-1.81 254.4.754.51.71.2.78 27.21 1.87..4 2.1 1.14.4.45 4. 27 2.7 -.4. -.4 -.24-1..72-2. -1.81 274 -.55 4. -.557 2745.4-1.5. -.4-1. -2.25.57.55-1.81 2.148 55 -.71. 4. -2.228-1..187.72 -.5-1.81 7 145 2.4 1.72..2 -.71-1.48.72.1.78 -.78 -.7..887. 1.41.545.754 1..57 -.55.78 12. -1.57. 4...27 1.1 2.1 1..45-1.48.78 5 -.557...24..217 -.28.8.25 1. 1.141-1.81.48.77. -.78 1.7-1.25 5 -.7 -.71 -.287.45.7-1.81 587.148.427 -.7 7.48.... 1.7.2 1.7 1.4.4. 4. 88.88.1..148.427.7 4.71-1.28. -2.224. -2.175-2.42 -.24-2.25-2.24.1.78 418-1.17.427.51 4288-2.55.1...8.75..77.78 41 -.78 -.5. 4...1 1.5.8 1. 1.172.17 1.17 4 -.18 -.178. -1.74..42.7 4. 2.41 -.15 4..78 44.21 1.. -1.17..22 -.55.8.71.45.45-1.81 45 -.84.252. -.172. -.2 -.78-1. -1.7 -.7 -.5-1.81 445 -. 1.. -.7 -.24.25 -..7-1.81 454 -.77 -.221-1.58-1..71 -..2-1.81 4 -.21.417..545-1. -.41 472 -.55 -.4. -.71..217 -.55.754.7..4 1.17 488.57.77..887..42.545 -.24.88 -.15-1.17.78 48 -.5. -.5..1 -.7.8 -.7 -.15-1.54-1.81 518-1.41 -.71-1. -1.218.72-1.81 54-1.425-2.1..778. -.2.545.427.187 1. 1.12.78 5.1.175. -.172. 1.582 5188. -1..75 521 -.8-1.5..44. -.57-2.4.754.75-1.884. -1.81 552 1.22.175. -.4 -.71..72-1.17.78 5447-1.41 1..88-1.81 544.1-2.21. 555-1.17-1. -1.27 571.245 -.85. -.54. -1.187 -.78 -.24 -. -.2.78 5858.4 1.85..82...72.754.25 1.4.718.78 55 -.55 4. -. -2.2 4. 175.2 -.7. 1.44. -.4.4 -.24 -.41-1.218.17.78 18.1.1..8. -.221.72.8 1.1.45.7.78 2.4.427.4 25 -.28 -.71.4.45 -.8.78 45.1.1. -.48..217.2 1.7 1.75 -..14-1.81 5.4-1.57...754 -.12 1.28 -.5.78 8.57.14-1.81 852.25 -.. -1.4..1.28 -.24-1.27 -.472 -.87.78 7 -.55-1. 711 -.44 -.47..8. -.4 1.44.754 -.41-1.884 -.2 1.17 7248.75 -.4. 1.4. -.57 1.28 -.24 -.41 1.51.77.78 72.1-4.. 1.44..217 -.472.45.78 7.72.8.75 7442. -1. -.858.57 -.75.78 754-2.85 1.8. -.57. -.221.28-2.25 -.12 -.7.827 1.17 75 -.557-1.5. -1.878..1 1.28 -.71.88.22.4-1.81 788.57 1.47. -.57. -.45 -.4 4..187 -.7.8-1.81 77.1 -.4..2. -.4 -.7 -.71-1. -.2.45.78 7728.44 -.545..57..217 1.1 1.57 -.858 1.57.827-1.81 787-1.41 -.71-1.25 78.48.77..44..42 1.28 -.71-1.25 -. -.187.78 7.25.42. -.8.. -2.42 4. -.41-1.218-2.77.78 74 -.28. -.172. -.7.754 -.12 -.2.4.78 72-1.25 1.71..2. 1.214 1.5.427 -.287 1.172.4 1.17 78-2.24 -.421..778. -1.58-1.41.8 1.14-1.71.77-1.81 88.4.. 1.28 -.71.51 -.2.4.78 8252.545.427.4 82.4 1.. -.5. -.2.545.8.4.22.827.78 82 -.7.. -.1 1.4 1.57 -.41 1.172.4 1. 88 PT Microbiologi Drinking water, September 21 7

Lab no. Sample Suspected coliform bacteria (MF) Coliform bacteria (MF) Susp. thermotolerant coliform bact. (MF) E. coli (MF) Coliform bacteria ("rapid" MPN) E. coli ("rapid" MPN) A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C 845 -.75-1.5.11 1.4..12 85 -.747.42 -.24-2.17. -4. 858 82 -. -1. 1.7 -.24. 1.4 828 -.1.1-1. -.87.. 8.21.11 -.84 -.24. -.754 -. -.477 -.5 -.2.. 8742 87.28 -.527 -.84 2.52. -1.177 -.4.1.14 -.17.. 88-1.55-1.7.28 -.785.. 884.8 1.118 -.81.77. -.5.25.24 1.1 1.8.. 882 1.81 -.44 -.84.21.. 1.57 -.8 1.88-1.15.. 881 888.758.75 -.81.55. -.5 -.875 -.425-1.11 -.77.. 855 -.21 2.48 -.84 -.87. -.754 -..81. -.51.. 88 2-1.75.278-1. -1.75...11.457. 2.171.. 4-1.875-2.11-1.55 -.77. -1.25-1.188-2. -.542-1.5.. 441.448-2.2.. 524 1.484.11 -.81... -.14.28 -.542.5.. 7.22 -.55.28-1.58..24 -.187 -.14 1.1 -... 8 1.81 1.214 -.51.7.. -.142.57 2.17 -.148...45.1.55...1 n 7 78 7 7 8 82 8 7 7 5 Min -.21-2.824-4. -2.17. -4. -2. -2. -1.1-2.2.. Max 1.5 2.48 4. 2.. 4. 2.14.427 2.5 2.87.. Median.21. -. -.141...5. -.... Mean..... -.4...... SD 1. 1. 1.177 1.. 1.17 1. 1. 1. 1... z<- 1 1 2 - z<-2 4 2 1 4 2 2 2<z 1 4 4 1 4 2 z> 2 1 1 8 PT Microbiologi Drinking water, September 21

Susp. intestinal Intestinal enterococci Susp. Pseudomonas Pseudomonas Total plate count Total plate count Lab no. enterococci (MF) (MF) aeruginosa (MF) aeruginosa (MF) 22 C, days ±2 C, 2 days A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C -.74-1.57. -.48. -.221 -.78-1. -.7 -..7-1.81 845.2 1.272..2.427.7 85.72 1.57 1.14 858.545-1. -.7 -..17 1.17 82 1... -.57. -.2 -.4-1. -.41.22.7.78 828-1.425 1.8..555..82.2 1.57.88.22 -.187 1.17 8 -.55 -.24-1.48 1.57.17 1.17 8742-1.17.188. 4.. -.45 -.28.8 -.41.71.45.78 87-1.24-2.1. -2.84 -.24 2.274-1.71 -.2.78 88 -.55.77..545 1. 1.75 1..7.27 884-2.45 1.11..7 -.24 -.7 882 1.28 -.71-1.27 881.4.175..2..42 1.28.8.7.4.45 1.17 888.81 -.218. -.71. -.1 -.28 1..75.4.257 1.17 855 88 -.74-1.824..4.427.51 2..427 1..22 1.75.78 -.2 -.421. -4.. -4. -2.84-1. -2.25 -.5 -.75.78 4-1.177 -.24-1. -2.41-2.1 1.17 441.817 -.5. -.55 -.71.51 -.472-1. 2.17 524.47.252. -.487. -.221.4 -.24 -.41 -.472.7-1.81 7.4.5. -.44. -.1..754 -.12 -..7.78 8.52.417. 1.5..11 1.4 4. 1.14 -.15 -.2 1.17 72 7 7 55 5 5 11 5 81 81 81 n -2.85-4.. -4.. -4. -4. -2.25-2.25 -.5 -. -1.81 Min 2.7 1.47. 4.. 4. 1.5 4. 2.41.4 4. 4. Max.5.111..24..1..8.75.72.17.78 Median. -...82.. -.77.242..5.4.18 Mean 1. 1.178. 1.52. 1.24 1.1 1. 1. 1.1 1.8 1.284 SD Summa 2 2 2 1 1 4 4 1 2 1 5 47 2 2 2 2 1 28 1 7 1 1 4 21 PT Microbiologi Drinking water, September 21

Annex C photos Drinking water, September 21 Mixture A m-endo Agar LES, 7 C m-lactose TTC Agar, 7 C 1 ml 1 ml m-fc Agar, 44 C Chromocult Coliform Agar, 7 C 1 ml 1 ml m-enterococcus Agar, 7 C m-pseudomonas CN Agar, 7 C 1 ml, 2 days 1 ml, 2 days 4 PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21

Mixture B m-endo Agar LES, 7 C m-lactose TTC Agar, 7 C 1 ml 1 ml m-fc Agar, 44 C Chromocult Coliform Agar, 7 C 1 ml 1 ml m-enterococcus Agar, 7 C m-pseudomonas CN Agar, 7 C 1 ml, 2 days on BEAA 1 ml, 2 days PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21 41

Mixture C m-endo Agar LES, 7 C m-lactose TTC Agar, 7 C 1 ml 1 ml m-fc Agar, 44 C Chromocult Coliform Agar, 7 C 1 ml 1 ml m-pseudomonas CN Agar, 7 C m-pseudomonas CN Agar, 7 C 1 ml, 2 days 1 ml, 2 days, from back side 42 PT Microbiology Drinking water, September 21