A Six Sigma Organization BNA Master Plan Update Community Advisory Committee Meeting No. 5 September 19, 2012
Introductions MNAA Staff RW Armstrong Team Albersman & Armstrong, Ltd. Atkins North America, Inc. Gresham, Smith and Partners Community Advisory Committee Members Others
Agenda Status of the BNA Master Plan Update Summary of Demand/Capacity Analysis & Facility Requirements Airport Development Concepts Landside Development Plan Next Steps Comments/Questions
Status Completed Demand/Capacity Analysis & Facility Requirements Finalizing Working Paper No. 3 Continued Airport Landside Development Plan Preparing Working Paper No. 4 Continued Airport Development Concepts Preparing Working Paper No. 5
Status cont Master Plan Process Aerial Survey & Mapping Implementation Plan Pre-Planning, Study Design, Secure Grants Inventory Existing Conditions Activity & Demand Forecasting Demand/ Capacity Analysis & Facility Requirements Alternative Development Concepts Final Documents ALP Set Public Involvement - Study Advisory Committees July 2011 November 2011 January 2012 July 2012 September 2012 January 2013 April 2013 = complete = ongoing Legend = in progress/to be completed
Demand/Capacity & Facility Requirements Summary cont Airfield Recommendations Summary - Preserve ARC D-V infrastructure throughout planning period. - Re-designate Runway 13/31 numbering to 14/32. - Add additional shoulder width to Runways 2R/20L and 2C/20C to meet ARC D-IV criteria. - Add paved shoulders to Runway 13/31 from the Runway 2L/20R intersection to Runway 13 end. - Extend Runway 20R blast pad by 50 ft. and widen by 25 ft. on both sides to meet ARC D-IV criteria. - Widen Runway 2L blast pad by 25 ft. on both sides to meet ARC D-IV criteria. - Due to hot spots for runway incursions, consider reconfiguration of: - Taxiway T3, which connects the Taxiway B/K intersection to the Taxiway L/T4 intersection. - Taxiway R3 at Taxiway A/K intersection. - Taxiways S7 and S6 adjacent to Runway 20C approach end. - Address taxiway intersection fillets that do not meet FAA design standards. - Extend Taxiway K northwest to the Runway 13 end to eliminate need for aircraft to cross Runway 13/31 from Taxiway K to access the Runway end. - Construct additional GA apron by PAL 2. - Consider extension to Runway 2L. *Note: Planning Activity Level
Demand/Capacity & Facility Requirements Summary cont Terminal Roadway Recommendations Summary - Add lane capacity within terminal area. - Expand decision-making distance. - Reduce or eliminate weaving. - Remove congestion at intersections. - Realignment of Donelson Pike. - Ensure compatibility with potential Harding Place extension.
Demand/Capacity & Facility Requirements Summary cont Gate and Terminal Recommendations Summary Ticket Lobby: - Reduce the amount of agent assisted check-in positions. - Increase the amount of baggage drop locations. - Increase the amount of self-service check-in kiosks. - Considerations for self-tagging baggage check-in. - Consider off-airport check-in locations. - Consider additional space for meeter/greeters as PALs increase. Baggage Claim: - Consider additional baggage claim device by PAL 4. - Consider additional circulation and restroom capacity to accommodate increased activity levels. Baggage Make-up: - Expand baggage make-up area. *Note: Planning Activity Level
Demand/Capacity & Facility Requirements Summary cont Gate and Terminal Recommendations Summary Landside Concessions: - Consider providing concessions offerings at Ground Transportation level. - Consider additional concessions offerings on the Baggage Claim level. Airside Concessions: - Consider opportunities for additional concessions. *Note: Planning Activity Level
Demand/Capacity & Facility Requirements Summary cont Gate and Terminal Recommendations Summary International Gates: - Construct a new Federal Inspection Service (FIS) facility with the capability of processing 600 passengers per hour when needed (development not tied to a specific PAL). - FIS will be constructed with swing gates designed to accommodate domestic passenger service when international flights were not scheduled. Commercial Development: - Consider hotel, gas station, and office type development in the terminal area. *Note: Planning Activity Level
Demand/Capacity & Facility Requirements Summary cont Support Facilities Recommendations Summary - Maintain existing air cargo facilities. - Consider additional deicing areas; potentially in GA or cargo areas. - Consider additional ARFF support if extending Runway 2L or constructing fourth parallel runway. - Consider reserving a site for a new ATCT.
Demand/Capacity & Facility Requirements Summary cont Surface Transportation and Parking Recommendations Summary - Provide ability to expand parking. - Institute policies and procedures that will facilitate future growth of on-airport parking demand. Examples include: - Implement a concession fee for off-airport parking providers. - Improve on-airport parking customer service. - Adjust parking rates to compete directly with off-airport parking providers. - Increase on-airport public parking by PAL 2*. - Consider relocating rental car service sites. - Add nine taxi queue spaces by PAL 1*, and 41 spaces by PAL 4*. - Add 10 cell phone spaces by PAL 1*, and 49 spaces by PAL 4*. *Note: Planning Activity Level
Demand/Capacity & Facility Requirements Summary cont Surface Transportation and Parking Recommendations Summary Year Enplanements ¹ On-Airport Demand ² Off-Airport Demand ³ Effective Supply ⁴ Surplus / (Deficit) 2011 4,806,092 8,699 2,211 14,428 5,729 2016 5,835,700 13,247 2,211 14,428 1,181 2021 6,929,300 15,730 2,211 14,428 (1,302) 2026 8,190,000 18,591 2,211 14,428 (4,163) 2031 9,658,600 21,925 2,211 14,428 (7,497) ¹ RW Armstrong; Preferred Forecast Summary, April 6, 2012. ² Based on 2.27 spaces / 1,000 enplanements. ³ 2012 Parking supply (includes on- and off-airport). ⁴ Assume off-airport parking demand remains at existing levels. Source: Albersman & Armstrong Ltd., 2012.
Airport Development Concepts Overview Addresses necessary facility requirements that are essential to accommodate the forecast demand Used to facilitate the selection of a long-term improvement concept for the Airport Addresses: Airside Terminal/Landside General Aviation, Support, & Cargo facilities Ground Access and Parking Planning charrette with MNAA was conducted in May to contribute information to the planning process
Airport Development Concepts Overview cont Evaluation of alternative concepts, individually and collectively, to gain clear understanding of strengths weakness, opportunities, and threats Includes: Recommended Alternatives Preliminary Environmental Analysis Phasing and Flexibility Feasibility factors Landside Development Plan is being prepared in conjunction with Airport Development Concepts Evaluation Matrix: Provides weighted scoring of development concepts BNA Sustainability Study factors are included in evaluation criteria
Airport Development Concepts Overview cont Example Evaluation Matrix: Airside Evaluation Evaluation Criteria Weight Score Evaluation Matrix Weighted Score Weighted Score Score Alternative Score Weighted Score Airside 1 2 3 Demand/Capacity Satisfaction 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ground Access and Circulation 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 Constructability 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 Expansion Flexibility 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 Program Phasing 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Facility Impacts 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Consistency with Master Plan Objectives 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Financial Feasibility 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aircraft Taxi Omission Reduction 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 Natural Resource Evasion 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 Source: RW Armstrong, 2012. Scoring: 1 = Positive 0 = Neutral -1 = Negative
Airport Development Concepts Overview cont Airfield Recommendations Summary: Preserve ARC D-V infrastructure Re-designate Runway 13-31 to Runway 14-32 Re-configuration of specified taxiway pavement edge fillets to accommodate Group IV standards Due to hot spots for runway incursions, consider reconfiguration of: Taxiway T3, which connects the Taxiway B/K intersection to the Taxiway L/T4 intersection Taxiway R3 at the Taxiway A/K intersection Taxiways S7 & S6 adjacent to the Runway 20C approach end Construct additional GA Apron Add additional shoulder width to Runways 2R/20L and 2C/20C to meet ARC D-IV criteria Add additional shoulder width to Runway 13/31 to 35 feet to meet ARC D-V criteria
Airport Development Concepts Overview cont Airfield Recommendations Summary: Add paved shoulders on runway 13/31 from the Runway 2L/20R intersection to Runway 13 end Extend Runway 20R blast pad by 50 feet and widen by 25 feet on both sides according to ARC D-IV criteria Widen Runway 2L blast pad by 25 feet on both sides according to ARC D-IV criteria Extend Taxiway K northwest to the Runway 13 end to remove the need for an aircraft to cross Runway 13/31 from Taxiway K to access the Runway 13 end Provide for additional runway with length of 11,000 feet to handle future aircraft fleet mix/operations Preserve land and airspace to accommodate new fourth parallel runway
Airport Development Concepts Overview cont Potential Airfield Expansion Options
Airport Development Concepts Overview cont Taxiway Fillet Deficiency Locations
Demand/Capacity Analysis & Facility Requirements cont Gate and Terminal Program Highlights: Passenger Terminal Building: Ticket Lobby Airline Gates and Hold Rooms International Arrivals Facility Baggage Claim Baggage Make-up Security (i.e., TSA Checkpoint, TSA Checked Baggage Screening) Public Space Concessions (i.e., Landside, Airside) Terminal Services
Demand/Capacity Analysis & Facility Requirements cont Gate and Terminal Program Highlights: Curbside Capacity: Ground Transportation Level Goal to restrict to commercial vehicles only Goal to minimize or eliminate pedestrian\vehicle interaction Baggage Claim / Arrivals Level Goal to reduce congestion and traffic backup issues during peak activity levels Ticketing / Departures Level Current configuration and capacity allows for future growth with minimal or no modifications required to address future growth
Demand/Capacity Analysis & Facility Requirements cont Potential International Arrivals Building locations Potential commercial development locations
Airport Development Concepts Overview cont Alternative 1 Parking Expansion Potential Total Net Gain = 8,000 Stalls Assumptions Donelson Pike will be realigned All new parking will be constructed in expanded Long Term Lot A Long Term Lot B, Economy and Valet Lots will remain The CONRAC facility will remain throughout planning period Relocation and expansion of cell phone lot Advantages More parking within walking distance of the passenger terminal Less busing required Disadvantages No improvement in way-finding
Airport Development Concepts Overview cont Alternative 2 Parking Expansion Potential Total Net Gain = 8,100 Stalls Assumptions Donelson Pike will be realigned All new parking will be constructed in expanded Long Term Lot A Long Term Lot B will remain Economy and Valet Lots to be abandoned The CONRAC facility will remain throughout planning period Relocation and expansion of cell phone lot Advantages Development opportunities in abandoned areas Simplified way-finding Disadvantages Higher capital costs because of requirement for structured parking
Airport Development Concepts Overview cont Alternative 3 Parking Expansion Potential Total Net Gain = 7,500 Stalls Assumptions Donelson Pike is not realigned The CONRAC is converted to public parking A new remote CONRAC is developed Long Term Lot B, Economy and Valet Lots will remain Advantages Not contingent on Donelson Pike relocation Lower capital costs for parking expansion Costs of new CONRAC borne by CFC (assuming it is still available) Disadvantages Little improvement to wayfinding High capital and operating costs associated with new CONRAC facility
Airport Development Concepts Overview cont RAC Service Center Location Alternatives Alternative 1 Assumptions 90 acres required for PAL 3 Existing CONRAC remains in terminal area Advantages No relocation required Disadvantages Uses land required for general aviation Alternative 2 Assumptions 90 acres required for PAL 3 Existing CONRAC remains in terminal area Advantages Shorter shuttle distance Land is currently available for GA development Disadvantages Requires relocation of existing service center sites
Airport Development Concepts Overview cont Support Facilities recommendations: Maintain existing air cargo facilities Consider additional deicing areas (potentially in GA or cargo areas) Consider additional Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) support if extending Runway 2L or construction of fourth parallel runway Consider reserving a site for a new ATCT
Airport Development Concepts Overview cont BNA Air Traffic Control Tower and ARFF Facility Recommendations
Airport Development Concepts Overview cont BNA General Aviation Development Concept 1
Airport Development Concepts Overview cont BNA General Aviation Development Concept 2
Airport Development Concepts Overview cont BNA General Aviation Development Concept 3
Airport Development Concepts Overview cont BNA General Aviation Development Concept 4
Airport Development Concepts Overview cont Ground Transportation Center (GTC) Summary: Centralized transportation hub providing public services, which may include: Shuttle services (MNAA and off-airport) Limo Taxi service Public transit Potential future Light Rail Transit (LRT) Commercial vehicle pick-up/drop-off Alleviates terminal curbside traffic congestion Creates additional terminal curbside access for Privately Owned Vehicles (POV)
Airport Development Concepts Overview cont Proposed Ground Transportation Center (GTC)
Landside Development Plan Overview A Six Sigma Organization
Next Steps Complete Working Paper No. 4 (Landside Development Plan) Complete Working Paper No. 5 (Airport Development Concepts) Begin Airport Plans (Airport Layout Plan set) Begin Environmental Overview Begin Financial Analysis Community Advisory Committee Meeting No. 6 (TBD)
Comments/Questions Thank you for your participation! www.flynashville.com