NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES

Similar documents
USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

Consideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.

AERODROME OPERATING MINIMA

AIRCRAFT NOISE INFORMATION PACK: CANNING VALE

Operational Procedures

FUEL MANAGEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT

THE CIVIL AVIATION ACT (No. 21 of 2013 THE CIVIL AVIATION (OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT) (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS, 2015

CHAPTER 5 SEPARATION METHODS AND MINIMA

Chapter 6. Airports Authority of India Manual of Air Traffic Services Part 1

SECTION 6 - SEPARATION STANDARDS

The aim of any instrument approach is to allow the aircraft to safely descend to a low altitude in order to become visual.

COMMUNITY NOISE MITIGATION SUGGESTIONS

KPGD HIGH. Punta Gorda Airport Punta Gorda, Florida, United States. Diagram #1: KPGD Departures. NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES by Whispertrack

SECTION 4 - APPROACH CONTROL PROCEDURES

EXTENDED-RANGE TWIN-ENGINE OPERATIONS

CESSNA CITATION IIB PW JT15D-4 INTRODUCTION. Runway Analysis provides the means to determine maximum allowable takeoff and landing weights based upon:

VFR GENERAL AVIATION FLIGHT OPERATION

Los Angeles Noise Mitigation. Captain Dan L. Delane FedEx Express Fleet Check Airman 13 November 2013

All-Weather Operations Training Programme

ADVISORY CIRCULAR ON CALCULATION OF DECLARED DISTANCES

Revised National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) Noise Abatement Departure Procedures (NADPs) Noise Compatibility Committee

PART 210 NOISE ABATEMENT AND RUNWAY PROCEDURES NOISE ABATEMENT AND PREFERENTIAL RUNWAY USE PROCEDURES

It is essential that planning take full account of air safety and efficiency of operations.

Decisions on which type of approach to use vary with each airline, and sometimes even for each flight. aero quarterly qtr_02 10

IFR SEPARATION WITHOUT RADAR

During all other times operators are required to use the designated run-up locations for run-ups above idle power.

IFR SEPARATION USING RADAR

Overview ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices for Aerodrome Safeguarding

AIR LAW AND ATC PROCEDURES

Lecture Minimum safe flight altitude

Operational Evaluation Board Report

Aerodrome Design Manual

SULAYMANIYAH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MATS CHAPTER 11

CHAPTER 5 AEROPLANE PERFORMANCE OPERATING LIMITATIONS

FALCON SERVICE ADVISORY

KPAO HIGH. Palo Alto Arpt Of Santa Clara Co Airport Palo Alto, California, United States Diagram #1: Noise Abatement Procedures All Runways

Consideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.

Phases of a departure

6. Cross-Country Flight Limitations. The following criteria shall be applied to the conduct of cross-country flights.

SECURITY OVERSIGHT AGENCY June 2017 ALL WEATHER (CAT II, CAT III AND LOW VISIBILITY) OPERATIONS

TEXT OF AMENDMENT 36 TO THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT

KSMO HIGH. Santa Monica Muni Airport Santa Monica, California, United States

PLAN Anoka County - Blaine Airport

ILS APPROACH WITH B737/A320

HEAD-UP DISPLAY (HUD), EQUIVALENT DISPLAYS AND VISION SYSTEMS

Introduction. Appendix D: Airspace Protection

Continuous Descent? And RNAV Arrivals

Review of brisbane Airport Noise Abatement Procedures

General Information Applicant Name and Address: Tel./Fax/ Contact Person Name/Tel./Fax/

The Noise & Environmental office reviews airline schedules and night-time performance of the airlines operating at the Airport.

NATIONAL PILOT LICENCING

Measuring, Managing and Mitigating Aircraft Related Noise

CLEARANCE INSTRUCTION READ BACK

1.2 An Approach Control Unit Shall Provide the following services: c) Alerting Service and assistance to organizations involved in SAR Actions;

THE TOWER CONTROL POSITION (TWR)

SPECIAL PROCEDURES FOR IN-FLIGHT CONTINGENCIES IN OCEANIC AIRSPACE OF SEYCHELLES FIR

Chapter 4 Noise. 1. Airport noise

CHAPTER 4 AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES

LFMN / Nice Côte-d Azur / NCE

KSBP HIGH. San Luis County Rgnl Airport San Luis Obispo, California, United States

OPERATIONS MANUAL PART A

AERODROME LIGHTING SYSTEM

CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY, PAKISTAN OPERATIONAL CONTROL SYSTEMS CONTENTS

Updates to Procedures at St. John s International Airport

Arriving and departing aircraft at Edinburgh Airport

INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATIONS. Agenda Item: B.5.12 IFATCA 09 WP No. 94

KPDX HIGH. Portland Intl Airport Portland, Oregon, United States

KOAK HIGH. Metropolitan Oakland Intl Airport Oakland, California, United States

NATIONAL PILOT LICENCING

Pilot RVSM Training Guidance Material

COMPANY POLICY Flight Safety & Operating Regulations

FIJI ISLANDS AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR

Any queries about the content of the attached document should be addressed to: ICAO EUR/NAT Office:

GHANA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY ALL WEATHER OPERATIONS

AD 2. AERODROMES. For the ICAO location indicators used for Canadian aerodromes, refer to the following publications:

March 2016 Safety Meeting

Andres Lainoja Eesti Lennuakadeemia

CATCODE ] CATCODE

KTRK HIGH. Truckee Tahoe Airport Truckee, California, United States

CHAPTER 7 AEROPLANE COMMUNICATION AND NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT

REVIEW OF GOLD COAST AIRPORT Noise Abatement Procedures

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION

Aerodrome Obstacle Survey Information Checks

UNITED KINGDOM AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR

LFPG / Paris-Charles de Gaulle / CDG

OPERATIONS CIRCULAR 01/2012. Subject: HEAD-UP DISPLAYS (HUD) AND ENHANCED VISION SYSTEMS (EVS)

FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL

UPDATE ON THE 6 IDEAS (1-4) NAV CANADA

SID/STAR phraseology FAQ Canadian implementation April 27, 2017

Community Impact: Focus on Knowle

ICAO Initiatives on Aircraft Noise

AMENDMENT No. 8 TO THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES AERODROMES ANNEX 14 TO THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION

THE AREA CONTROL CENTRE (CTR) POSITION

OPERATIONS MANUAL PART A

and the Environment Speaker: Guy Viselé External Communication Advisor ABC User Committee, February 2 nd 2009

KHND MEDIUM. Henderson Executive Airport Las Vegas, Nevada, United States. Diagram #1: Airport Map All Aircraft Categories / All Runways

Guidance material for land use at or near aerodromes

Helicopter Performance. Performance Class 2 - The Concept. Jim Lyons

KAPF HIGH. Naples Muni Airport Naples, Florida, United States

ONE-ENGINE INOPERATIVE FLIGHT

Transcription:

1. Introduction NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES Many airports today impose restrictions on aircraft movements. These include: Curfew time Maximum permitted noise levels Noise surcharges Engine run up restrictions APU operating restrictions Preferential runways Minimum noise routing These restrictions are based on ICAO international standards and recommended practices. The noise abatement procedures describe the methods for noise abatement when environment requires it. They can be: Use of noise preferential runways to direct the initial and final flight path away from noise sensitive areas Use of noise preferential routes to assist aeroplanes in avoiding noise-sensitive areas on departure and arrival Use of noise abatement take-off or approach procedures in order to minimise the overall exposure to noise on the ground Minimum use of reverse thrust after landing Displaced landing threshold Nothing in these procedures shall prevent the pilot-in-command from exercising authority for the safe operation of the aeroplane. Noise abatement procedures Version 1.1 08 January 2016 Page 1

2. Noise preferential runways and routes 2.1. Noise preferential runways A runway for take-off or landing may be nominated for noise abatement purposes. The objective is to utilize whenever possible those runways that permit aero planes to avoid noise-sensitive areas during the initial departure and final approach phases of flight. Runways should not be selected for noise abatement procedure for landing operations unless they are equipped with suitable path guidance like ILS (instrument landing system) or a visual approach slope indicator system (PAPI,VASI ). Noise abatement shall not be a determining factor in runway nomination under the following circumstances: Runway surface conditions are adversely affected by for example snow, ice, water, mud, oil Landing conditions: ceiling is lower than 500ft (150m) above aerodrome elevation Landing conditions: when visibility is less than 1900m Landing conditions: Ceiling is lower than 800ft (240m) above aerodrome elevation when approach requires vertical minima greater than 300ft (100m) above aerodrome elevation Landing conditions: Visibility is less than 3000m when approach requires vertical minima greater than 300ft (100m) above aerodrome elevation Take-off conditions: Visibility is less than 1900m Wind shear has been reported or forecast and expected to affect the approach or departure Thunderstorm has been reported or forecast and expected to affect the approach or departure Crosswind component, including gusts, exceeds 15kt (28km/h), or the tailwind component, including gusts exceeds 6kt (9km/h). 2.2. Noise preferential routes Noise preferential routes are established to ensure that departing and arriving aircraft avoid overflying noise-sensitive areas in the vicinity of the aerodrome as far as practicable. In establishing noise preferential routes the safety criteria of standard departure and standard arrival routes regarding obstacle clearance climb gradients and other factors described in ICAO documents should be taken into full consideration. Noise abatement flight procedures can be one of these: Noise abatement arrival procedure (NAAP) Continuous descent arrival or approach (CDA) Noise abatement departure procedure (NADP) Low power or low drag approach profile These routes and all standard departure and standard arrival routes should be compatible. An aircraft should not be diverted from its assigned route unless: Departing aircraft has attained the altitude which represents the upper limit for the noise abatement procedure It is necessary for the safety of the aircraft like avoidance of severe weather, resolving traffic conflicts, pan or emergency declared by the pilot. Noise abatement procedures Version 1.1 08 January 2016 Page 2

3. Aircraft operating procedure This chapter provides guidance with regard to aircraft noise-mitigating measures associated with the application of departure climb, approach and landing procedure and the use of displaced runway thresholds. 3.1. Operational limitations The pilot in command has the authority to decide not to execute a noise abatement departure procedure if conditions preclude the safe execution of the procedure. Aircraft operating procedures for the departure climb shall ensure that the safety of flight operations is maintained while minimizing exposure to noise on the ground: Noise abatement climb procedures is secondary to meeting obstacle clearance requirements The power or thrust settings specified in the aircraft operating manual are to take account of the need for engine anti-icing when applicable Noise abatement considerations are no longer applicable if aircraft face a failure or shutdown of an engine or any other apparent loss of performance at any stage of the procedure (take-off, departure, arrival, landing) Noise abatement considerations are no longer applicable when wind shear warning exists or the presence of wind shear activity is suspected The maximum acceptable body angle specified for an aircraft type shall not be exceeded. Initial power or thrust reductions shall not be executed below a height of 800ft (240m) above aerodrome elevation. Noise abatement procedures shall not contain a prohibition of use of reverse thrust during landing. The practice of using a displaced runway threshold as a noise abatement measure shall not be employed unless aircraft noise if significantly reduced by such use and the runway length remaining is safe and sufficient for all operational requirements. 3.2. Noise abatement departure climb guidance Aircraft operating noise abatement procedures for the take-off climb shall ensure that the necessary safety of flight operations is maintained while minimizing exposure to noise on the ground. The first procedure NADP 1 is intended to provide noise reduction for noise-sensitive areas in close proximity to the departure end of the runway. The second procedure NADP 2 is intended to provide noise reduction for noise-sensitive areas more distant from the runway end. The two procedures differ in that the acceleration segment for flap/slat retraction is either initiated prior to reaching the maximum prescribed height or at the maximum prescribed height. To ensure optimum acceleration performance, thrust reduction may be initiated at an intermediate flap setting. These methods are present ICAO methods but they do not constitute the only methods to be followed. These procedures are provided as examples because the noise reduction obtained greatly depends on the type of aircraft, engine type, thrust required and the height at which thrust is reduced. Noise abatement procedures Version 1.1 08 January 2016 Page 3

Commercial airlines are encouraged to develop own procedures that maximize noise reduction from their aircraft. 3.2.1. Noise abatement climb NADP1 This procedure involves: Power or thrust reduction at or above the prescribed minimum altitude 240m or 800ft above aerodrome elevation. Initial climbing speed is not less than V 2 + 10kt or V 2 + 20 km/h and below V 2 + 20kt or V 2 + 40 km/h Delay of flats/slats retraction until the prescribed maximum altitude 900m or 3000ft is attained At the prescribed maximum altitude 900m or 3000ft, the aircraft is accelerated and the flaps/slats are retracted on schedule while maintaining a positive rate of climb, to complete the transition to normal en-route climb speed. Noise abatement procedures Version 1.1 08 January 2016 Page 4

3.2.2. Noise abatement climb NADP2 This procedure involves: Power or thrust reduction at or above the prescribed minimum altitude 240m or 800ft above aerodrome elevation. Flats/slats retraction at or above the prescribed minimum altitude 240m or 800ft above aerodrome elevation but before the prescribed maximum altitude 900m or 3000ft Flaps/slats are retracted on schedule while maintaining a positive rate of climb Intermediate flap retraction, if required for performance may be accomplished Aircraft body angle of pitch is decreased, aircraft is accelerated towards V zf (Minimum Safe manoeuvring Velocity with Zero Flaps) Initial climbing speed is not less than V 2 + 10kt or V 2 + 20 km/h Power or thrust reduction is initiated at a point along the acceleration segment that ensure satisfactory acceleration performance. At the prescribed maximum altitude 900m or 3000ft, the aircraft is accelerated to complete the transition to normal en-route climb speed. Noise abatement procedures Version 1.1 08 January 2016 Page 5

4. Conclusion Although noise abatement procedures may have quantifiable environmental benefits in terms of noise, effective implementation may be difficult. Procedures must be developed, tested, and evaluated for: ATC impacts variations in aircraft performance may make it difficult for controllers to efficiently sequence and space traffic Capacity requirements NAPs may generate unacceptable delay and congestion Aircraft equipment sophisticated flight management systems are required Pilot acceptance NAPs often increase pilot workload Airport configuration and local community characteristics availability of adjacent land mass to modify arrivals or departures Terrain and obstacles terrain or manmade obstacles may severely limit ATC, airport and aircraft operators to implement simple and effective NAPs Noise abatement procedures Version 1.1 08 January 2016 Page 6