MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT MARCH gatwickairport.com/performance

Similar documents
MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT FEBRUARY gatwickairport.com/performance

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT JANUARY gatwickairport.com/performance

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT APRIL gatwickairport.com/performance

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT OCTOBER gatwickairport.com/performance

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER gatwickairport.com/performance

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT OCTOBER gatwickairport.com/performance

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT MAY gatwickairport.com/performance

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER gatwickairport.com/performance

Performance monitoring report for first half of 2016

Performance monitoring report for the second half of 2015/16

Performance monitoring report for first half of 2015

Performance monitoring report for 2014/15

Performance monitoring report 2017/18

Departure Punctuality - Sep-17. Departure Punctuality - Last 12 Months

Departure Punctuality - Dec-17. Departure Punctuality - Last 12 Months

Operational Performance Reporting Manchester Airport August 2018

Operational Performance Reporting Manchester Airport March 2018

Operational Performance Reporting Manchester Airport January 2018

Gatwick Airport (LGW)

Number of complaints decided where a financial remedy awarded. Number of complaints received others

Departure Punctuality - Jun-17. Departure Punctuality - Last 12 Months

Departure Punctuality - Oct-17. Departure Punctuality - Last 12 Months

Departure Punctuality - Feb-17. Departure Punctuality - Last 12 Months

Departure Punctuality - Aug-17. Departure Punctuality - Last 12 Months

Departure Punctuality - May-17. Departure Punctuality - Last 12 Months

Departure Punctuality - Apr-17. Departure Punctuality - Last 12 Months

Remedy awarded (complaints decided in qtr)

Punctuality for june 2018 per airline

Punctuality for may 2018 per airline

Punctuality for july 2018 per airline

Punctuality for september 2018 per airline

Punctuality for november 2018 per airline

Punctuality for march 2014 per airline

Punctuality for february 2017 per airline

Punctuality for may 2014 per airline

Punctuality for april 2018 per airline

Punctuality for september 2013 per airline

Punctuality for june 2014 per airline

Headlines S19 Start vs. S18 Start vs. S18 End

Punctuality for july 2015 per airline

Punctuality for june 2015 per airline

Gatwick Airport (LGW)

Punctuality for july 2012 per airline

I am writing in respect of your recent request of 10 January 2018, for the release of information held by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA).

Lyon St Exupéry Airport LYS/LFLL

Punctuality for february 2018 per airline

Punctuality for october 2017 per airline

I am writing in respect of your recent request of 5 February 2018, for the release of information held by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA).

Punctuality for august 2017 per airline

The contents of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of COHOR.

Half Year Traffic Highlights

The contents of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of COHOR.

Heathrow Airport (LHR)

I am writing in respect of your recent request of 11 January 2018, for the release of information held by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA).

Customer Relations Programme

Punktlighed for september 2018 pr. flyselskab

Bristol Airport (BRS)

Dublin Airport (DUB) Winter 2018/19 (W18) Start of Season Report Report Date: Thu 04-Oct-2018 Headlines W18 Start vs. W17 Start vs.

Lyon St Exupéry Airport LYS/LFLL

Getting to Salamanca FROM MADRID AIRPORT

Facts & Figures. Non-US Airline Traffic Aircraft Data. Aircraft Values. US Consumer Complaints February US Fuel Cost And Consumption

Undertakings provided to CAA under Part 8 of the Enterprise Act 2002

GATWICK AIRPORT LGW WINTER 2013/14 (W13) Start of season

The Heathrow Service Quality Rebate Scheme

Punctuality for october 2012 per airline

EVOLUTION OF ALLOCATED SLOTS AT THE START OF SEASON (SOS)... 2 TOTAL SLOTS BY OPERATOR TOP SLOTS DISTRIBUTION PER ALLIANCE...

For SOP the CAA holds data for the time period 1 August 2016 to 31 December 2016.

Start of Season Report Nice Côte d Azur Airport Summer Nice Côte d Azur Airport NCE/LFMN. Summer Start Of Season Report

Undertakings provided to CAA under Part 8 of the Enterprise Act 2002

Prediction of Skytrax airline rankings, short formula (2e)

Flight Performance Team Annual Report 2016

Punktlighed for august 2017 pr. flyselskab

Stansted Airport (STN)

EVOLUTION OF ALLOCATED SLOTS AT THE START OF SEASON (SOS)... 2 TOTAL SLOTS BY OPERATOR TOP SLOTS DISTRIBUTION PER ALLIANCE...

Start of Season Report Nice Côte d Azur Airport Winter Nice Côte d Azur Airport NCE/LFMN. Winter Start Of Season Report

Special assistance at Gatwick. If you need a little extra help, we re here to assist

Group Flights. Conducted by YouGov on behalf of Civil Aviation Authority. Fieldwork Dates: 28th December th January 2018

Headlines W15 Start vs. W14 Start vs. W14 End

Logan International Airport

Ancillary Revenue per Passenger for 2013 was $16, Up Nearly 129% from 2007

Undertakings provided to CAA under Part 8 of the Enterprise Act 2002

Lyon St Exupéry Airport LYS/LFLL

Manchester Airport (MAN)

Low Fares The Engine For Passenger Growth 3 rd April 2003

NOTICE TO PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR DISABLED PERSONS AND PERSONS WITH REDUCED MOBILITY UNDER SECTION 85 OF THE CIVIL AVIATION ACT 2012

STANSTED AIRPORT LIMITED REGULATORY ACCOUNTS PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH Financial Review...1. Performance Report...

Quality of Service Monitoring Dublin Airport October - December 2015

Persons with reduced mobility, hidden and non-hidden disabilities Users Guide January 2019

LCCs: in it for the long-haul?

10 million meeters & greeters per year

Global Aviation Monitor (GAM)

Global Aviation Monitor (GAM)

Global Aviation Monitor (GAM)

Quality of Service Monitoring at Dublin Airport

SCHEDULING LIMITS 2 SCHEDULE ADJUSTMENT 3 TOP AIRLINES ANALYSIS 4 TOP ROUTES ANALYSIS 5 TOP 10 AIRCRAFT TYPE 6

Airlines and passengers with a disability

Global Aviation Monitor (GAM)

Moving Towards a Customer Centric Approach. Dr. Philippe Villard Head, Policy & Economics

Global Aviation Monitor (GAM)

The path of Rome Fiumicino Airport to operational excellence. EURO Aviation IT Summit Budapest September 28, 2018

Transcription:

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT gatwickairport.com/performance

At Gatwick we are committed to ensuring all areas of our business live up to the expectations of our passengers, our partners and our regulator. As part of this commitment we publish monthly reports which we have now brought together into one easy to follow report. You can view or download these reports at any time at gatwickairport.com/performance If you have any comments or feedback to help us improve please send them to customer.services@gatwickairport.com CONTENTS Core Service Standards Airline Service Standards PRM Service and Notification On-time Performance ACI Airport Service Quality Ranking > > > > >

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS departure lounge seating availability 3.80 4.02 4.02 Ease of finding a seat Results from our passenger surveys Measured as a score from 1-5 5 = Excellent 1 = Extremely Poor 3.80 3.93 3.96 airport cleanliness 4.00 4.12 4.13 Overall cleanliness of the terminal Results from our passenger surveys Measured as a score from 1-5 5 = Excellent 1 = Extremely Poor 4.00 4.15 4.15 Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. measured over the last 12 months. 3

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS airport wayfinding 4.10 4.20 4.22 Ease of finding your way around our airport Results from our passenger surveys Measured as a score from 1-5 5 = Excellent 1 = Extremely Poor 4.10 4.26 4.26 airport flight information 4.20 4.41 4.42 Accuracy and ease of finding flight information Results from our passenger surveys Measured as a score from 1-5 5 = Excellent 1 = Extremely Poor 4.20 4.49 4.49 Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. measured over the last 12 months. 4

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS waiting time at central security search 95.00% 97.56% 98.39% Percentage of time when passengers queued for 5 minutes or less 95.00% 98.09% 98.79% The waiting time is the delay imposed by the queue for security including ticket presentation and facial capture, up to the point that the passenger reaches the security roller bed. waiting time at central security search 98.00% 99.94% 99.96% Percentage of time when passengers queued for 15 minutes or less 98.00% 99.98% 100% The waiting time is the delay imposed by the queue for security including ticket presentation and facial capture, up to the point that the passenger reaches the security roller bed. Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. measured over the last 12 months. 5

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS waiting time at central security search 0 0 0 Instance where a single queue is measured at 30 minutes or more 0 0 0 The waiting time is the delay imposed by the queue for security including ticket presentation and facial capture, up to the point that the passenger reaches the security roller bed. flight connections security search 95.00% 99.97% 99.90% Percentage of time when passengers queued for 10 minutes or less 95.00% 99.01% 97.08% This measure applies to 95% of core hours. Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. measured over the last 12 months. 6

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS staff security search 95.00% 99.93% 99.57% Percentage of time when staff queued for 5 minutes or less 95.00% 99.78% 99.60% This measure applies to 95% of core hours. North Terminal Staff performance calculated as average performance of both search areas. external control posts security search EXTERNAL CONTROL POSTS 95.00% 99.93% 99.90% Percentage of time when queue time is 15 minutes or less This measure applies to 95% of core hours. Performance for the Northen Approach Gate. Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. measured over the last 12 months. 7

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS passenger sensitive equipment priority availability 99.62% 99.62% Availability of priority equipment including lifts, escalators and passenger conveyors 99.66% 99.62% This covers instances of equipment breakdown or unplanned maintenance affecting the availability of priority Passenger Sensitive Equipment (PSE) during core operational hours. passenger sensitive equipment general availability 99.64% 99.66% Availability of general equipment including lifts, escalators and passenger conveyors 99.72% 99.51% This covers instances of equipment breakdown or unplanned maintenance affecting the availability of general Passenger Sensitive Equipment (PSE) during core operational hours. Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. measured over the last 12 months. 8

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS baggage outbound baggage process 97.00% 99.50% 99.44% Percentage of flights when bags are delivered to the airline ground handler 25 minutes or more before the scheduled time of departure 97.00% 99.51% 99.45% This is a daily event based measure, the score shown relates to the lowest daily performance baggage outbound baggage process 99.97% 99.98% Percentage of flights when bags are delivered to the airline ground handler 25 minutes or more before the scheduled time of departure 99.96% 99.98% This is a monthly average measure Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. measured over the last 12 months. 9

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS airfield stand availability 99.90% 99.77% Percentage of time when aircraft stands are available Stand availability is measured between the following agreed core hours: 00:00-11:00 and 19:00-00:00 99.88% 99.74% airfield jetty/airbridge availability 99.84% 99.93% Percentage of time when aircraft jetties (airbridges) are available for aircraft boarding/disembarking 99.77% 99.71% Jetty availability is measured between the following agreed core hours: 00:00-11:00 and 19:00-00:00 Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA measured over the last 12 months. 10

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS airfield pier service 95.00% 96.84% 96.77% Percentage of time when stands with pier service are available as opposed to remote stands 95.00% 97.52% 97.94% This measure is based on the total number of passenger movements (arrivals and departures). If a passenger is able to walk into the pier, then the stand is classed as a pier served stand. airfield fixed electrical ground power 99.89% 99.97% Percentage of time when fixed electrical ground power (FEGP) units are available for aircraft 99.89% 99.89% FEGP availability is measured between the following agreed core hours: 00:00-11:00 and 19:00-00:00. FEGP powers aircraft when on a stand allowing engines to be turned off. Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA measured over the last 12 months. 11

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS inter-terminal shuttle one shuttle available INTER 100% 100% Percentage of time when one shuttle with a minimum of one car is available Core hours vary dependent on agreed maintenance periods. inter-terminal shuttle two shuttles available INTER 97.00% 99.23% 99.27% Percentage of time when two shuttles with a minimum of one car each are available Core hours vary dependent on agreed maintenance periods. Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA measured over the last 12 months. 12

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS arrivals baggage reclaim carousels 99.88% 99.90% Availability of our baggage reclaim carousels for arriving flights 99.82% 99.95% For information on the arrivals baggage performance please refer to the Airline Service Standards section of this report. aerodrome congestion term AIRPORT OVERALL 0 0 0 An event occurs which is the responsibility of the airport or its agents which causes an impact in terms of a number of aircraft movements lost or deferred Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA measured over the last 12 months. 13

AIRLINE SERVICE STANDARDS small/medium aircraft baggage performance time for small/medium aircraft last bag delivered within 35 minutes Time from the on-chocks time supplied by the airlines handling agents to delivery to the baggage carousel. Airlines achieving 95% or higher are considered to have met the target successfully. AIRPORT OVERALL SMALL/ MEDIUM AIRCRAFT Flights within target time in 95.30% AIRLINES 1-10 BY VOLUME OF FLIGHTS Airline & Handling Agent easyjet DHL British Airways BA GGS Norwegian NORWEGIAN Ryanair Vueling Number of flights 3,351 97.67% 200 91.50% 1,261 94.61% 175 99.43% 810 95.06% 106 92.45% 297 267 Flights within target time 95.96% 97.75% Airline & Handling Agent Aer Lingus Aurigny AURIGNY TAP Air Portugal TUI Airways Flybe Number of flights 76 Flights within target time 100 61.00% 100% Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines. Baggage performance is measured between the following agreed core hours: 0400-2200 from May to October for both terminals, 0500-2100 between November to May for North Terminal and 0500-2200 between November to May for South Terminal. 14

AIRLINE SERVICE STANDARDS small/medium aircraft baggage performance time for small/medium aircraft last bag delivered within 35 minutes AIRLINES 11-21 BY VOLUME OF FLIGHTS Airline & Handling Agent Number of flights Flights within target time Airline & Handling Agent Number of flights Flights within target time Turkish Airlines 71 74.65% Titan Airways 30 53.33% Air Europa Líneas Aéreas 62 95.16% Air Arabia Maroc 27 100% Iberia Express 61 90.16% Air Malta 27 100% airbaltic 47 100% Aeroflot Russian Airlines DNATA 24 91.67% Ukraine International Airlines 37 91.89% Continental Airlines 23 100% Royal Air Maroc 31 96.77% All other airlines 129 82.17% Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines. Baggage performance is measured between the following agreed core hours: 0400-2200 from May to October for both terminals, 0500-2100 between November to May for North Terminal and 0500-2200 between November to May for South Terminal. 15

AIRLINE SERVICE STANDARDS large aircraft baggage performance time for large aircraft last bag delivered within 50 minutes Time from the on-chocks time supplied by the airlines handling agents to delivery to the baggage carousel. Airlines achieving 95% or higher are considered to have met the target successfully. AIRPORT OVERALL LARGE AIRCRAFT Flights within target time in 96.97% AIRLINES 1-10 BY VOLUME OF FLIGHTS Airline & Handling Agent British Airways Number of flights Flights within target time Airline & Handling Agent Emirates BA GGS 353 99.15% 93 98.92% Norwegian DNATA Vueling Number of flights Flights within target time NORWEGIAN 217 97.70% 60 98.33% Virgin Atlantic VS SWP TUI Airways Thomas Cook 173 93.06% 158 95.57% 148 93.92% WestJet WOW Air Air Transat VS SWP 44 97.73% 38 97.37% 34 100% Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines. Baggage performance is measured between the following agreed core hours: 0400-2200 from May to October for both terminals, 0500-2100 between November to May for North Terminal and 0500-2200 between November to May for South Terminal. 16

AIRLINE SERVICE STANDARDS large aircraft baggage performance time for large aircraft last bag delivered within 50 minutes AIRLINES 11-21 BY VOLUME OF FLIGHTS Airline & Handling Agent Icelandair Cathay Pacific DNATA China Airlines DNATA Turkish Airlines RWANDAIR Number of flights Flights within target time 33 93.94% 29 100% 19 100% 14 100% 13 92.31% Wizz Air 10 100% Airline & Handling Agent Tianjin Airlines Smart Wings Titan Airways Number of flights Flights within target time 7 85.71% Finnair 1 100% Germania 3 100% 2 100% 1 100% Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines. Baggage performance is measured between the following agreed core hours: 0400-2200 from May to October for both terminals, 0500-2100 between November to May for North Terminal and 0500-2200 between November to May for South Terminal. 17

AIRLINE SERVICE STANDARDS waiting time at check in Percentage of time when passengers queued for 30 minutes or less The waiting time is the delay imposed by the queue for check in or bag drop within a defined airline check in area, up to the point that the passenger reaches the check-in desk or bag drop desk/kiosk. Airlines achieving 95% or higher are considered to have met the target successfully. AIRPORT OVERALL Service Score 98.77% AIRLINES 1-11 BY VOLUME OF DEPARTING PASSENGERS Airline / Operator Departing Passengers Service Score Airline / Operator Departing Passengers Service Score easyjet 738,889 100% Thomas Cook Airlines 51,017 99.80% British Airways 295,503 92.38% Ryanair 50,596 100% Norwegian 221,378 99.44% Emirates 45,523 98.79% TUI Airways 88,852 99.76% Aurigny 13,268 99.70% Virgin Atlantic 58,934 100% Turkish Airlines 12,895 100% Vueling 53,948 99.51% All other airlines 172,317 98.85% Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines. Check-in queue performance is measured for the time in which an airline s individual check-in is open or the agreed defined time of an airline s check-in operation. Aer Lingus performance data not available due to temporary relocation of the airlines check in area. 18

PRM STATISTICS Gatwick provides a range of services to passengers with reduced mobility (PRM) or who require special assistance. For information on how to access these services please go to gatwickairport.com/prm Number of flights with PRM passengers met Number of passengers needing special assistance met Percentage of pre-notifications at least 48 hours before flight* Number of compliments received (per 1000 PRM passengers) Number of complaints received (per 1000 PRM passengers) 12 Month Average 0.44 12 Month Average 1.08 13,201 47,242 55.96% 0.32 1.46 * Passengers pre-notification to their airline is required by EU regulation EC 1107/2006/. Pre-notification furthermore helps us provide a better service 19

PRM STATISTICS departing PRE-BOOKED Standard* 10 mins 20 mins 30 mins 80% 90% 100% April May June July August September 93.44% 77.85% 87.06% 85.63% 89.41% 80.20% 96.72% 88.61% 95.52% 95.63% 96.32% 90.88% 98.36% 92.41% 98.51% 98.13% 98.75% 94.88% * waiting time once PRM made themselves known. 20

PRM STATISTICS arriving PRE-BOOKED Standard* 5 mins 10 mins 20 mins 80% 90% 100% April May June July August September 98.30% 85.96% 84.81% 87.02% 77.50% 86.82% 99.07% 89.38% 88.66% 89.64% 90.49% 94.74% 99.74% 95.41% 94.63% 95.43% 96.08% 95.90% NON PRE-BOOKED Standard* 25 mins 80% April May June July August September 99.63% 94.38% 93.86% 93.79% 92.61% 91.31% 35 mins 90% 99.62% 95.55% 95.95% 96.93% 96.39% 95.72% 45 mins 100% 99.87% 97.17% 98.31% 98.21% 97.90% 97.60% * time assistance available at gate from arrival on chocks. 21

ON-TIME PERFORMANCE departures on-time performance Percentage of flights departing Gatwick within 16 minutes of the scheduled time AIRPORT OVERALL 73.00% arrivals on-time performance Percentage of flights arriving at Gatwick within 16 minutes of the scheduled time AIRPORT OVERALL 74.60% 22

ACI ASQ HOW DO WE COMPARE? Q1 2018 Airports Council International produce a measure of overall satisfaction with the airport. It shows how we compare against a panel of 20 European Competitor airports, as well as how our score (out of 5) has changed over time. Gatwick ranked 9 out of 20 in Q1 2018 How we have performed over time 4.50 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 4.00 3.50 3.00 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Q1 2013 Q2 2013 Q3 2013 Q4 2013 Q1 2014 Q2 2014 Q3 2014 Q4 2014 Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Gatwick s score Panel average Q4 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 23