Quantification of Coliform and Escherichia coli in Keropok lekor (Malaysian Fish Product) During Processing

Similar documents
GB Translated English of Chinese Standard: GB NATIONAL STANDARD OF THE

Indicator organisms. !Group of microorganisms use to reflect the quality and safety of a process food product

Gently apply pressure on spreader to distribute over circular area. Do not twist or slide the spreader. Interpretation

3M TM Petrifilm TM. Petrifilm TM 3M TM. 3M TM Petrifilm TM Serie 2000 Rapid Coliform Count Plates - Ref.: / 50 Unit - Ref.

Food Microbiological Examination: Enumeration of Coliforms

Coliform Count. Interpretation Guide. 3M Food Safety 3M Petrifilm Coliform Count Plate

Project Summary. Principal Investigators: Lawrence D. Goodridge 1 ; Phil Crandall 2, and Steven Ricke 2. Study Completed 2010

Petrifilm. Interpretation Guide. Coliform Count Plate. Brand

Interpretation Guide 3M Petrifilm Rapid Coliform Count Plates

MICROBIAL ANALYSIS OF RAW AND BOILED MILK SOLD AT BARATON CENTER IN NANDI COUNTY, KENYA

Int. J. Biosci Comparative analysis of microbiological status between raw and ready-to-eat product of black tiger shrimp (Penaeus

Addressing challenges associated with the detection of faecal coliform organisms in water matrices. Neil Leat Rand Water Date 30/09/2014

Interpretation Guide

Interpretation Guide. Coliform Count Plate

HSCC. Interpretation Guide. High-Sensitivity Coliform Count Plate

INTERPRETATION GUIDE AN INTRODUCTION TO USE AND INTERPRETING RESULTS FOR PEEL PLATE CC TESTS. FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT CHARM SCIENCES

Comparison of Enterococci and Coliform Microorganisms in

Interpretation Guide

Project Summary. Principal Investigators: Chance Brooks, Mindy Brashears, Mark Miller, Alejandro Echeverry, and Cassandra Chancey

Sampling for Microbial Analysis

Pr oject Summar y. Survey of the prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on the surface of subprimal cuts of beef during winter months (Phase I)

Core practical 13: Isolate an individual species from a mixed culture of bacteria using streak plating

Pr oject Summar y. Impact of ground beef packaging systems and temperature abuse on the safety of ground beef

Comparison of Gelman and Millipore Membrane Filters for Enumerating Fecal Coliform Bacteria

Volume 7 No FOOD AND ITS PREPARATION CONDITIONS IN HOTELS IN ACCRA, GHANA: A CONCERN FOR FOOD SAFETY. Kennedy Addo

Gas Chromatographic Presumptive Test for Coliform Bacteria in Water

REC. Interpretation Guide. Rapid E. coli/coliform Count Plate

Microbial Hygiene Considerations with Mechanical Harvesting of Blueberries

Bacterial Occurrence in Kitchen Hand Towels

Examination of Market Foods for

ISPUB.COM. Microbiological Quality Of Sweetmeat With Special Reference To Staphylococci. S Chakraborty, A Pramanik, A Goswami, R Ghosh, S Biswas

Kit Information 3. Sample Preparation 4. Procedure 4. Analysis of Results 5. Quality Control 6. Disposal 6. Technical Support 6. Order Information 6

Laboratories & Consulting Group

INTERPRETATION GUIDE AN INTRODUCTION TO USE AND INTERPRETING RESULTS FOR PEEL PLATE EC TESTS. FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT CHARM SCIENCES

Food Stamp Hygiene control on food and food Environment

Sterile Technique TEACHER S MANUAL AND STUDENT GUIDE

Food Stamp Hygiene control on food and food environment

VALIDATION OF DRY-AGING AS AN EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION STEP AGAINST ESCHERICHIA COLI O157:H7

Effectiveness of Interventions to Reduce or. Colin Gill Lacombe Research Centre

IDEXX Summary. D P Sartory and C Allaert Vandevenne

NordVal International / NMKL c/o Norwegian Veterinary Institute PB 750 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo, Norway

Changes in Surviving E.coli, Coliform Bacteria and General Bacteria in Manure with Air Drying Treatment

There are 7 kinds of unique dry medium for hygienic testing and detection of food poisoning bacteria.

r., C D C5,) -I2ET dun 241,%3 Sco C)6 C-.) TISIA TECHNICAL DOCUMENTARY REPORT AAL-TDR-6Z-55 AAL- TDR-62-55

Serial Disinfection with Heat and Chlorine To Reduce Microorganism Populations on Poultry Transport Containers

Convenient Media Solutions For food and water testing

3M Food Safety 3M Petrifilm Plates and 3M Petrifilm Plate Reader

E. coli and Coliform Bacteria Levels of Edgewood s Watershed Katie Schneider and Leslie Reed

COLILERT - WHAT'S AL THE FUSS ABOUT? Elizabeth Hanko. Elizabeth Hanko, Senior Consultant. AWT, Victoria

Evaluation of Membrane Filters for the Determination of Numbers of Coliform Bacteria in Waterl

Detection of Total Coliforms, Escherichia coli, and

Evaluation copy. Fecal Coliform. Computer INTRODUCTION

Bacteriological testing of water

Fecal Coliform Bacteria Monitoring for the Sleepy Creek Watershed Incremental 319 Project Final Report

Project Title Assessing postharvest food safety risks and identifying mitigation strategies for foodborne pathogens in pistachios

Bacterial Interference with Coliform Colony Sheen Production on

Characterization of the Coliform and Enteric Bacilli in the Environment of Calves with Colibacillosis

Effect of food safety systems on the microbiological quality of beef

CERTIFICATE OF ACCREDITATION

Coliforms as Indicator of Faecal Pollution

Bacterial Quality of Crystalline Rock and Glacial Aquifers in New England

3M Food Safety 3M Petrifilm Plates and Reader. Simply. Prompt. Precise. Productive.

Coliform Species Recovered from Untreated Surface Water

Factors Affecting the Microbiological Quality of Burgos and Villalon Cheeses at the Retail Level

IMPACT OF ŠABAC INDUSTRY ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION OF THE SAVA RIVER 1

Comparison of the Novel ColiPlate

TOTAL COLIFORM ANDE.coli INDICATOR BACTERIA TEST KIT UV

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

Jonathan Howarth Ph.D and Tina Rodrigues BS Enviro Tech Chemical Services Modesto, CA 95258

Microbiological Analysis of Food Contact Surfaces in Child Care Centers

Microbiological Analysis of Food Contact Surfaces in Child Care Centers

Water Quality Trends for Patchogue Bay

Jnci lei-ica ar,d select i v i t y of nedia IX. c i" c - "O di tril'v. t i on of 'd. cbls.«"intorai.odiatw s " and Aerobaotei* I I I.

Productivity. Technician. Maximized. Interpretation Guide

Water Quality Trends for Conscience Bay

BSc (Hons) Food Science and Technology (Minor: Food Microbiology) (Full-Time)

Kit Information 4 Introduction. 4 Kit Contents, Storage, and Testing Conditions. 4 Equipment Needed. 4 Applicability. 4 Precautions... 4.

BACTERIAL CONTAMINATION OF WATER WELLS AND SPRINGS

GROWTH RATE OF COLIFORM ORGANISMS IN COTTAGE CHEESE AND RECONSTITUTED NON-FAT MILK. Wendell Ray Skelton AN ABSTRACT

Issue Date: March 1, M Petrifilm Plates Certifications, Recognitions and Validations

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

TACWA September Meeting CHALLENGES IN MEETING THE TEXAS BACTERIAL LIMITS WITH UV ALONG THE COAST AND BAYS. Gennady Boksiner, P.E. September 30, 2011

Oregon Department of Human Services HEALTH EFFECTS INFORMATION

Proficiency Testing FINAL REPORT Check sample program 16CSP02 February 2016

Chromocult Coliform Agar acc. ISO

USE OF BIOFERTILIZERS IN BERRY FIELD AND FOOD SAFETY

Loyalsock Creek Bacterial Coliforms. Presented By: Dr. Mel Zimmerman Clean Water Institute Lycoming College Matthew Bennett Jim Rogers

Aquatic Park, which is situated along the Berkeley shoreline (Figure 1, p. 126), can be a pleasant

Confirmation Protocol for E. coli O157:H7

Operational safety of urine diversion toilets in Durban, South Africa

Protecting Consumers. Improving lab efficiency. 3M Petrifilm Plates and Reader

Enumeration of Total Coliforms

Bacteriological Analysis of Drinking Water in Port Sudan City, Red Sea State, Sudan

Portland Water District Sebago Lake Monitoring Programs Lower Bay Bacteria Monitoring Presenting data from 1977 to 2018 Laurel Jackson

Proficiency Testing. Food Microbiology. January Laurence Nachin, Christina Normark and Irina Boriak

3M Molecular Detection Assay E. coli O157 (including H7) Performance Summary

FECAL COLIFORM MONITORING IN GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY: SUMMARY REPORT OF MONITORING RESULTS FOR

Efficacy of Antimicrobial Agents in Lettuce Leaf Processing Water for Control of Escherichia coli O157:H7

AQIS MEAT NOTICE. Last Notice this Category

Technological Field Performance of a New Point-of-Use Water Treatment Technology in a Randomized Control Trial in Limpopo, South Africa

Transcription:

Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 6(11): 1651-1655, 2010 2010, INSInet Publication Quantification of Coliform and Escherichia coli in Keropok lekor (Malaysian Fish Product) During Processing 1 Nor Khaizura M.A.R., 1 Loh S.W., 3 Zaiton H., 2 Jamilah B., 4 Rusul, G., 1 Department of Food Science, 2 Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor 3 Faculty of Science and Technology, Islamic Science University of Malaysia, 71800 Nilai, Negeri Sembilan 4 School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Minden, Penang Abstract: Keropok lekor samples during processing namely as mincing, mixing, kneading, boiling, and cooling stage from a processing plant in Selangor were test to determine the total plate count, coliform, fecal coliform and Escherichia coli. Coliform and fecal coliform were detected during processing in all stages. Escherichia coli was detected in fecal coliform for all stages. This indicated that fecal contamination occurred during processing. Total plate count, coliform, and fecal coliform were detected in mincing stage was at levels of 6.29 log10 CFU/g, 4.04 log 10 MPN/g, and 3.78 log 10 MPN/g, respectively. There were no significant changes during mixing and kneading stage. Boiling reduced the total plate count, coliform, and fecal coliform significantly (p<0.05) with log reduction of 2.66 log10 CFU/g, 2.27 log 10 MPN/g, and 1.33 log 10 MPN/g, respectively. However, a significant (p<0.05) log increase of 2.62 log 10 CFU/g for total plate count, 2.02 log10 MPN/g for coliform and 1.51 log10 MPN/g for fecal coliform during cooling stage was observed. Finish product of keropok lekor contained 6.61 log 10 CFU/g of total plate count, 3.79 log 10 MPN/g of coliform and 3.02 log10 MPN/g of fecal coliform. Results indicated that keropok lekor is easily contaminated after boiling and during cooling stage. Therefore, good hygiene practices (GHP) should be enforced in keropok lekor processing to ensure no post-processing contamination. Key words: Coliform; Escherichia coli; keropok lekor INTRODUCTION Keropok lekor is a popular traditional fish product especially in Malaysia. It is made from fish flesh that is minced and mixed with starch, salt, crushed ice and monosodium glutamate. Different type of fish are use in keropok lekor processing such as ikan parang (Chirocentrus dorab), ikan tamban beluru (Clupea leiogaster) [12], ikan selayang (Decapterus russelli) and the other common varieties of fish used are ikan tamban bular (Dussumieria hasselti), ikan tamban sisek (Sardinella fimbriata), ikan biji nangka (Upeneus sulphureus), ikan selar kuning (Selaroides leptolepis) and ikan gelama (Sciaena spp.) [11,12]. Nowadays, keropok lekor has become the national favorite delicious food as appetizer or snack. It has gained a nationwide potential market as the demand and consumption of keropok lekor is increasing parallel with the increasing popularity of this traditional snack. Thus there is increasing public concern in the safety and quality of keropok lekor. Production of keropok lekor is increased and improved recently from largely backyard manufacturing process to modern small or medium factory scale manufacturing process due to the higher domestic demand. Therefore, such a standardized hygienically made product would require by consumers and may acquire the potential to export outside the region over and above the demand, respectively. Basically, there are five different processing stages in keropok lekor processing, it normally comprises mincing the fish flesh, mixing the minced fish with other ingredients, kneading and rolling the dough, boil the product in water and cool the product before it is packaged. A good part of seafood processing requires handling. The risks of contamination, therefore, can become a function of the number of processing steps [8]. Presently, safety and quality of keropok lekor is variable as the microbiological safety and quality specification for this product has not been fully developed or specified. Therefore, postharvest control Corresponding Author: Nor Khaizura M.A.R., Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor E-mail: norkhaizuranovember 14, 2010@yahoo.com 1651

(i.e. the control of processing) is a very important factor in maintaining the safety of food [8]. Consequently, examination of foods for microbial indicator organisms has become normal practice as the basic to monitor the safety and quality control of food and to assess food sanitation. Hence, this study is serving as a preliminary investigation of hygiene and sanitary quality in keropok lekor processing. The findings would be useful for improving the processing procedure and maintaining the quality of keropok lekor during and after processing, storage and retail market. The objective of this study is to evaluate the hygiene and sanitary quality in keropok lekor during different processing stages by the number of coliform and Escherichia coli presence. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sampling: Samples were taken four times at different periods from a keropok lekor processing factory in Selangor. Samples were collected using sterile utensils and placed into sterile plastic bag. Keropok lekor samples for physicochemical and microbiological analysis were collected from the following five processing stages: mince fish, after mixing of all ingredients, after kneading and rolling the dough, after boiling, and after cooling at ambient temperature. All samples were kept in pre-chilled container with crushed ice (4±1EC) and were analyzed within 24 hours of collection. Physicochemical Analysis: Measurement of ph was carried out by inserting the probe electrode of phmeter (Mettler Toledo) direct into each stage of samples. Water activity (a w ) was measured using Aqualab (Decagon Aqualab). Two repetition of reading for ph and a w were taken for each sampling. Microbiological Analysis: Enumeration of Total Plate Count. A 1:10 dilution of sample was prepared aseptically by homogenizing 25 g of sample with 225 ml of sterile peptone water (OXOID) in stomacher bag and mixed well using stomacher (Seaward Stomacher 400, BA-7021). Appropriate decimal dilutions of the samples were prepared using the same diluent and plated in duplicate onto Plate Count Agar (PCA)(OXOID) incubated at 37 EC for 48 hours. Enumeration of Coliform: Coliforms were determined by the three tube most probable number (MPN) method. 1 ml of diluted sample from each dilution was inoculated into MacConkey broth (MERCK) for presumptive test of coliforms. Tubes were incubated at 35 o C for 24 and 48 hours. Brilliant green bile broth (MERCK) was used for confirmed test of coliforms. Tubes were incubated at 35 o C for 48±2 hour. Enumeration of Fecal Coliform: Fecal coliform was determined by MPN method. Positive MacConkey broth tubes were gently agitated and a loopful from this culture was transferred to EC broth (MERCK) tubes. All tubes were incubated at 45.5 o C for 48±2 hours and examined for gas formation. Confirmation of Escherichia coli: Confirmation of E. coli was done by isolation of the bacteria from gassing EC tubes cultures. Each gassing EC tube were agitated gently and a loopful were streaked onto eosin methylene blue agar (OXOID) and were incubated at 35 o C for 24 hours. Plates were examined for the typical nucleated, dark-centered colonies with a metallic sheen which are indicative of E. coli. Single typical E. coli like colony was selected and transferred to a PCA slant. Slants were incubated at 35oC for 18 to 24 hours. Confirmation of E. coli was carried out by IMViC test. Cultures were transferred into the following media for IMViC test: 1)Tryptone water (MERCK). Tubes were incubated at 35 o C for 24±2 hours and Kovac s indole agent was used to test for indole production. 2) Methylred Voges-Proskauer broth (MERCK). Tubes were incubated at 35 o C for 24±2 hours. 1mL of medium was transferred into a small glass test tube and Voges-Proskauer reagent (α-napthol solution then 40% KOH solution) was added to test for acetylmethycarbinol. Remainder of MR-VP culture was incubated for an additional 48 hours and methyl red indicator was added to test for methyl red reaction. 3) Simmon s citrate agar (DIFCO) slant. Slants were incubated at 35EC for 48 hours. Citrate utilization was signaled by a green to bright blue color change. Additionally, cultures from PCA slant were transferred to lauryl tryptose broth (OXOID) and incubated at 35 o C for 48±2 hours. Tubes were examined for gas formation from lactose. Gram staining was performed with a smear prepared from a 24 hours culture from PCA slant. Coliforms are nonsporeforming bacilli which stain red (gram negative); gram positive organism stain purple. Confirmation of E. coli presence was determined by gram-negative, non-sporeforming rods producing gas in lactose and producing + + (Biotype I) or + (Biotype II) IMViC patterns. Statistical Analysis: All data collected were analyzed by SAS 9.1 statistical package (SAS Institute, Inc. 2002-2003) using one-way analysis of variance 1652

(ANOVA). Duncan's multiple range was used to determine significant differences among means. All data reported are the means of four replicates. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Temperature, ph and Water Activity of Keropok Lekor: Temperature of samples was measured at each processing stage and is shown in Table 1. Temperature of samples increased gradually from mincing to kneading stage. Boiling increased the temperature to 85.69 C in the center of keropok lekor when heat was applied at 100 C for 10 min. This temperature was reduced to 27.06 C within 1 to 2 hours during cooling at ambient temperature. There is no significant difference (p>0.05) was found between processing stages for ph and water activity. ph of keropok lekor ranged from ph 6.61 to 6.87; and water activity of keropok lekor was considered very high as it ranged from 0.98 to 0.99. Bacterial Counts of Keropok Lekor: Total plate count (TPC) of keropok lekor observed during mincing, mixing, and kneading was at 6.29, 6.25 and 6.65 log10 CFU/g, respectively. The TPC of keropok lekor decreased to 3.99 log10 CFU/g during boiling and increased to 6.61 log10 CFU/g in finish product after cooling stage (Figure 1). TPC of keropok lekor produced from this processing plant exceeded the 10 6 /g limits set by Malaysia Food Regulations 1985 for fish and fish product. Result shows that coliform, fecal coliform, and E. coli were detected during processing in all stages (Figure 2). Presence of E. coli in fecal coliform analysis was detected and their numbers ranged from log 2.19 MPN/g to log 1.48 MPN/g. Highest coliform numbers in keropok lekor was observed during mincing, which was more than log 4.04 MPN/g. Boiling reduced the numbers of coliform and fecal coliform significantly (p<0.05) with about 1 to 2 log reduction of MPN from kneading stage to log 1.77 MPN/g and log 1.51 MPN/g, respectively. However, both MPN/g of coliform and fecal coliform increased significantly during cooling with about 1 to 2 log increment of MPN/g. As such finish product contained log 3.79 MPN/g of coliform and log 3.02 MPN/g of fecal coliform. Numbers of coliform observed in keropok lekor after cooling was above 5 10/g limits prescribed by Malaysia Food Regulations 1985 for fish and fish product. log 10 CFU/g and there were no significant different during mixing and kneading. The temperature observed was slightly increased during mixing and kneading stage. This may be due to heat generation by machinery used, excessive handling of food handlers during processing especially during kneading the dough. However, the temperature measured was still in range that suitable for growth of most microorganisms [13,7]. Microorganisms require water and suitable ph medium for growth, hence limiting the amount of water content and altering the ph will affect microbial multiplication in food [2]. Values of ph and water activity in samples observed show that ingredients used such as salt and MSG and heat treatment applied do not affect or impart significant changes in ph and water activity. Range of ph and water activity in keropok lekor observed is related to be a supportive parameter of high TPC and coliform in samples analyzed as the ranges were favored the growth of most of the microorganisms in general [7]. During boiling a significant reduction was observed in TPC, coliform and fecal coliform. This may be due to increased temperature of 85.69EC at the center of keropok lekor when heat applied at 100 o C for 10 min. Application of heat to an internal temperature of 63 o C for 15 seconds for seafood during cooking which recommended by FDA s 1997 Food Code was reported as safe for consumption [9]. However, this temperature is only sufficient for the destruction of vegetative form of pathogens and therefore is not the sole safety factors for the whole production process [4]. The product is categorized as pasteurized but not sterilized. The result of study corroborate the earlier study of Yokoseki [14] who reported fish sausage is not sterile and can contain up to 10 3 bacteria/g of sausage meat after heat processing at 85 to 90 o C for approximately 1 hour. Finish product of keropok lekor contained 6.61 log 10 CFU/g of TPC, 3.79 log 10 MPN/g of coliform, and 3.02 log 10 MPN/g of fecal coliform indicate that post-processing contamination occurred in the samples during cooling stage. Possible reasons for the high TPC could be due to lower microbiological quality of mince fish used for production, unsatisfactory processing from a sanitary point of view, or lower microbiological quality of water used for cleaning utensils and work surfaces. High TPC in this perishable product may also indicate unsuitable time or temperature conditions during storage [6]. Discussion: Average TPC in minced fish was 6.29 1653

Table 1: Temperature, ph, and water activity of keropok lekor during processing stages 1. Processing stage Temperature 2 ( C) ph 2 Water activity (a w ) 2 Mincing 14.14±7.09 d 6.61±0.16 a 0.99±0.02 a Mixing 17.24±2.16 c, d 6.64±0.28 a 0.98±0.01 a Kneading 20.95±0.48 c 6.64±0.28 a 0.98±0.01 a Boiling 85.69±1.66 a 6.87±0.07 a 0.98±0.01 a Cooling 27.06±0.47 b 6.78±0.12 a 0.98±0.01 a 1 Data represent mean ± standard deviation of four replications. 2 Data in the same column with different superscript is different significantly (p< 0.05). Fig. 1: Total plate count (TPC) of keropok lekor during processing stages 1. Fig. 2: MPN of coliform, fecal coliform, and E. coli of keropok lekor during processing stages 1. Coliform and E. coli are often used as indicator microorganisms to assess food sanitation than quality [7]. The existence of coliform bacteria may not necessarily indicate a direct fecal contamination of the product, but more precisely as an indicator of poor hygiene and sanitary practices during processing and further handling in plant [1]. Therefore, high coliform in samples indicated poor sanitary conditions during processing and cross-contamination occurred in the plant. Huss et al. [5] also stated that bacteria present on the raw material may survive during processing of various fish products and thus be present on the final product or they may be eliminated. Further contamination with new microorganisms after processing is also possible. Post-processing contamination through sanitary and manufacturing practices would also contribute immensely to the microbial load in the final product [10,3]. This was observed in present study where detection of coliform, fecal coliform, and E. coli in the finish product. Presence of E. coli in fecal coliform analysis indicates the recent fecal contamination occurred during processing. In this study, an increase in TPC, coliform, fecal coliform, E. coli after cooling, which had decreased after boiling, seem to be the result of recontamination caused by personnel hands, work surface of cooling stage or environmental air. Recontamination of heat treated products before packaging is a critical problem faced by manufacturer where there is a potential for 1654

microbial growth in the final product [5]. Hence, hygienic processing and preparation of food has for many years been regarded as a basic requirement and the first line of defense against pathogenic microorganisms. But this approach is unable to secure fish products free of pathogens; good hygiene, cleaning, and sanitation are necessary to secure low levels of microorganisms on the final product [4]. Conclusion: Boiling stage was found to be able to reduce significantly (p<0.005) in the numbers of TPC, coliform and fecal coliform to a satisfactory level. However, poor hygiene and improper handling resulted the boiled keropok lekor contaminated during cooling stage. Good hygiene processing (G++P) could may be enforced during keropok lekor processing in order to eliminate the post-processing contaminated. REFERENCES 1. Chye, F.Y., A. Abdullah and M.K. Ayob, 2004. Bacteriological quality and safety of raw milk in Malaysia. Food Microbiol., 21: 535-541. 2. Forsythe, S.J. and P.R. Hayes, 1998. Food hygiene, microbiology, and HACCP. 3rd ed. Gaithersburg, Md: Aspen Publishers, Inc. 3. Frank, J.F., G. L. Christen and L.B. Bullerman, 1993. Tests for groups of microorganisms. In: Marshall, R. T. (ed.). Standard methods for the examination of dairy products. APHA, p. 271-286. 4. Huss, H.H., 1997. Control of indigenous pathogenic bacteria in seafood. Food Cont., 8: 91-98. 5. Huss, H.H., A. Reilly and Ben P.K. Embarek, 2000. Prevention and control of hazards in seafood. Food Cont., 11: 149-156. 6. ICMSF., 1978. Indicator microorganisms. In: Thatcher, F.S., Clark, D.S. (eds.). Microorganisms in Foods. 1. Their Significance and Methods of Enumeration. University of Toronto Press, p: 3-14. 7. Jay, J.M., 2000. Modern Food Microbiology. Apac Publishers, Inc., p: 387-406. 8. Jemmi, T., M. Schmitt and T.E. Rippen, 2000. Safe handling of seafood. In: Farber, J. M. and Todd, E.C.D. (eds.). Safe Handling of Food. Marcel Dekker, Inc., p: 105-165. 9. Kurtzweil, P., 1999. Critical Steps Toward Safer Seafood. FDA Consumer, Publication No. (FDA) 99-2317. 10. Mahari, T. and B. Gashe, 1990. A survey of the microflora of raw and pasteurised milk and the sources of contamination in a milk processing plant in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. J. Dairy Research, 57: 233-238. 11. Siaw, C.L., S.Y. Yu and S.S. Chen, 1979. Studies on Malaysia fish cracker effect of sago, tapioca and wheat flour on acceptability. Second Symposium of the Federation of Asian and Oceanian Biochemists, Kuala Lumpur, p: 128-136. 12. Wan Musa, W.A.W., 2004. Personal Communication. Keropok lekor manufacturer, Gombak, Selangor. 13. Weiser, H.H., G.J. Mountney and W.A. Gould, 1971. Practical Food Microbiology and Technology. Avi Publishing Co. 14. Yokoseki, M., 1957. Studies on the internal spoilage of fish jelly. I. surviving microorganisms in fish jelly products cooked at different temperature. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish., 25: 581-588. 1655