Operational Performance

Similar documents
Sound Transit Operations March 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Manual vs. Automatic Operation and Operational Restrictions

Follow-up to Proposed Fare Changes for FY2013

Sound Transit Operations January 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode

Sound Transit Operations March 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode

Sound Transit Operations December 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations January 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations February 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations June 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations January 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations August 2015 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Monthly Performance Report

Bus Operations Report

December 2018 Monthly Performance Report

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT DECEMBER 2015

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 22, 2014

January 2019 Monthly Performance Report

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Monthly Performance Report

Report by Finance Committee (B) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

EXHIBIT 1. BOARD AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND SUBSEQUENT ISSUANCE OF A JOINT DEVELOPMENT SOLICITATION

Shared Use by Marriott of WMATA s Parking Garage at Prince George s Plaza Metrorail Station

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

Silver Line Operating Plan

Board of Directors Information Summary

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

Metro s Transit Police Crime Statistics and Upcoming Events Information

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

VCTC Transit Ridership and Performance Measures Quarterly Report

RULES AND REGULATIONS

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER 2017

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

TRANSPORTATION SERVICE Actual

Transit Performance Report FY (JUNE 30, 2007)

Mount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! wmata.com/bus

MERRIMACK VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MVRTA) PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FIXED ROUTE

2017/2018 Q3 Performance Measures Report. Revised March 22, 2018 Average Daily Boardings Comparison Chart, Page 11 Q3 Boardings figures revised

MONTHLY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2017

Approval to Conduct Public Hearings to Increase Metrobus Charter Fee Schedule

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER Performance Management Office

CHAPTER 5: Operations Plan

METRO OPERATIONS COMMITTEE

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Services Utilization Study

Figure 2: Public Transit Systems Operating in Northern Virginia Operating Statistics and Performance Indicators, FY 2004

YOSEMITE AREA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

Huntington Metro Station Joint Development

ATTACHMENT A.7. Transit Division Performance Measurements Report Fiscal Year Fourth Quarter

PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

Scorecard Key Performance Indicators

PTN-128 Reporting Manual Data Collection and Performance Reporting

FIXED ROUTE DASHBOARD JULY 2018

1 YORK REGION TRANSIT/ VIVA SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

PERFORMANCE REPORT JANUARY Keith A. Clinkscale Performance Manager

October REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

Attachment C: 2017/2018 Halifax Transit Year End Performance Report. 2017/2018 Year End Performance Measures Report

Matt Miller, Planning Manager Margaret Heath-Schoep, Paratransit & Special Projects Manager

2.0 Miami-Dade Transit System Overview

Table of Contents. List of Tables

About This Report GAUGE INDICATOR. Red. Orange. Green. Gold

ESCAMBIA COUNTY AREA TRANSIT MTAC REPORT

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

BaltimoreLink Implementation Status Report

TRI-COUNTY TRANSPORTATION FOR SENIORS AND/OR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTS

REVIEW OF SUN METRO LIFT SERVICES

Chapter 3. Burke & Company

Bus Reliability and Punctuality Performance

2018 Service Implementation Plan Executive Summary

* Data for prior months has been updated to reflect error corrections from missing passenger count data

DISTRICT EXPRESS LANES ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017 JULY 1, 2016 JUNE 30, FloridaExpressLanes.com

Proposition E: Municipal Transportation Quality Review

CONGESTION REPORT 1 st Quarter 2018

2010 MTA Financial Plan & Proposed LIRR Service Reductions Supplemental Information. MTA Long Island Rail Road

Board Box. October Item # Item Staff Page 1. Key Performance Indicators Sep 2018 M. Mungia Financial Report Aug 2018 H.

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

Hertfordshire Business Barometer September 2018

CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards

Board Box. February Item # Item Staff Page 1. Key Performance Indicators M. Thompson Financial Report for Dec H.

UNION STATION ACCESS AND CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT STUDY PROJECT REPORT

Planning, Engineering & Construction Department September 2017

Statistics Report. May Page 1

3rd Quarter 2015 Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP) Public Input Meeting

F L I G H T S A F E T Y F O U N D A T I O N. For Everyone Concerned with the Safety of Flight

Policy committee Item: 11 Ref: PC086. National Rail Performance Report - Quarter (Oct-Dec 2015)

FY Year End Performance Report

GREENBELT-BWI THURGOOD MARSHALL AIRPORT EXPRESS LINE ROUTE B30

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

Statistics Report. April Page 1

Transport Indicators Report June 2018

Kent Business Barometer December 2018

Report to the Dulles Corridor Advisory Committee

Metrobus Service Evaluations

TRI-COUNTY TRANSPORTATION FOR SENIORS AND/OR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTS

BUSINESS BAROMETER December 2018

CONGESTION MONITORING THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE. By Mike Curran, Manager Strategic Policy, Transit New Zealand

Transcription:

Customer Services, Operations, and Safety Committee Board Action/Information Item III-A January 10, 2008 Operational

Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation Authority Board Action/Information Summary Action Information MEAD Number: Resolution: Yes No PURPOSE To provide the Committee monthly operational highlights, system performance trends for FY08. DESCRIPTION Information contains operational highlights that have occurred during the first five months of FY08 in the areas of on-time performance, reliability and customer satisfaction for Metrorail, Metrobus and MetroAccess. FUNDING IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION None

Operational Presented to the Board of Directors: Customer Service, Operations, and Safety Committee January 10, 2008

Rail On-Time Summary DEFINITION - Measured during peak service (morning, evening), mid-day and late nighttime hours on each line end to end - identifies percentage of trains with headway deviations less than 2 minutes. This measures how well we are providing service. CALCULATION (Number of Metrorail station arrivals number of headways with 2 minutes or > deviation) / number of Metrorail station arrivals = Metrorail On Time End to End. Rail On Time Peformance - Overall Average 100% 98% 96% 94% 92% 90% 88% GOAL 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% FY2008 92% 89% 89% 90% 89% FY2007 93% 93% 94% 93% 94% 94% 93% 92% 93% 90% 91% 91%

Rail On Time (Peak Time) DEFINITION - Measured during peak service (morning, evening), mid-day and late nighttime hours on each line end to end - identifies percentage of trains with headway deviations less than 2 minutes. This measures how well we are providing service. CALCULATION (Number of Metrorail station arrivals number of headways with 2 minutes or > deviation) / number of Metrorail station arrivals = Metrorail On Time End to End. RAIL - On Time Peak AM Service 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% GOAL 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% FY2008 89% 87% 86% 87% 85% FY2007 90% 90% 91% 89% 89% 90% 88% 87% 89% 86% 88% 87% Rail On Time Peak PM Service 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% GOAL 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% FY2008 86% 83% 83% 84% 83% FY2007 86% 86% 89% 88% 88% 91% 88% 87% 88% 85% 84% 83%

Rail On Time (Off Peak) DEFINITION - Measured during peak service (morning, evening), mid-day and late nighttime hours on each line end to end - identifies percentage of trains with headway deviations less than 2 minutes. This measures how well we are providing service. CALCULATION (Number of Metrorail station arrivals number of headways with 2 minutes or > deviation) / number of Metrorail station arrivals = Metrorail On Time End to End. Rail On Time Mid Day Service 100% 98% 96% 94% 92% 90% 88% 86% GOAL 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% FY2008 95.7% 91.1% 92.0% 92.5% 92.8% FY2007 97.1% 96.0% 96.9% 96.3% 97.6% 96.9% 96.9% 94.3% 96.4% 93.2% 95.2% 93.6% Rail On Time Late Night Service 100% 98% 96% 94% 92% GOAL 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% FY2008 98.9% 95.6% 96.9% 96.6% 97.4% FY2007 99.2% 99.4% 99.0% 99.2% 99.5% 99.3% 99.3% 99.4% 98.0% 96.5% 98.5% 98.8%

Rail Reliability Completed Trips DEFINITION Percentage of Metrorail completed weekday trips. CALCULATION- Average number of weekday completed trips/ average number of weekday trips = Percentage of completed trips. Metrorail Percentage of Completed Trips 100.0% 99.8% 99.6% 99.4% 99.2% 99.0% GOAL 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% FY2008 99.5% 99.3% 99.6% 99.5% 99.4% FY2007 99.5% 99.5% 99.6% 99.7% 99.7% 99.6% 99.6% 99.5% 99.7% 99.6% 99.5% 99.5%

Bus Reliability DEFINITION - Metrobus miles traveled between any incident which caused the customer to transfer between buses for any reason, i.e. maintenance, accidents, occurrences, etc. CALCULATION - Number of occurrences resulting in service disruption / miles = Mean Distance Between Service Interruptions (MDSI). BUS Mean Distance Between Service Interruptions 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 GOAL 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 FY2008 2,576 2,733 2,666 2,615 2,908 FY2007 2,944 3,365 2,671 2,956 3,216 3,652 3,444 2,379 2,827 2,887 2,480 2,652

Escalators and Elevators Reliability DEFINITION - Percentage of time that the escalator or elevator system is available for service. CALCULATION - Hours achieved divided by operating hours. Hours achieved = operating hours - (hours out of service both scheduled and unscheduled). Operating hours = revenue hours * number of units. Escalator Reliability 96% 94% 92% 90% 88% 86% 84% GOAL 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% FY2008 93.5% 93.9% 94.6% 94.5% 95.3% FY2007 88.3% 87.9% 87.8% 91.2% 91.7% 91.2% 92.2% 92.0% 92.5% 93.5% 94.0% 93.3% Elevator System Reliability 98.0% 97.0% 96.0% 95.0% 94.0% 93.0% 92.0% 91.0% GOAL 97.5% 97.5% 97.5% 97.5% 97.5% 97.5% 97.5% 97.5% 97.5% 97.5% 97.5% 97.5% FY2008 95.2% 95.3% 96.6% 97.0% 97.3% FY2007 93.4% 94.4% 94.6% 95.9% 97.0% 95.9% 95.3% 94.7% 94.9% 95.6% 95.8% 94.4%

MetroAccess DEFINITION - Percentage of on time pickup within a 30 minute window (15 minutes before or after scheduled pickup time). CALCULATION - (Completed trips - number of trips with a 30 minute or > deviation) / number of completed trips = MetroAccess On Time. MACS On Time 95.0% 94.0% 93.0% 92.0% 91.0% 90.0% 89.0% 88.0% GOAL 93.5% 93.5% 93.5% 93.5% 93.5% 93.5% 93.5% 93.5% 93.5% 93.5% 93.5% 93.5% FY2008 93.8% 93.2% 92.3% 90.5% 90.6% FY2007 94.1% 94.0% 92.1% 92.2% 92.3% 92.9% 94.6% 93.3% 93.1% 92.4% 93.0% 93.6% Percent of Missed/Excessively Late Trips (30 mins beyond the scheduled pick-up window) 2.5 2.0 Percentage 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 GOAL 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 FY2008 1.4 1.2 1.7 1.6 2.0 FY2007 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.0 1.3 1.8 1.5 1.9 1.6 1.4 DEFINITION - Percentage of missed/excessively late trips (beyond 30 minutes). CALCULATION Number of trips with a >30 minute deviation from the scheduled arrival time/ Completed trips = MetroAccess Percentage of Missed/Excessively Late Trips.

Customer Satisfaction Measure DEFINITION - Overall customer satisfaction on performance - survey results published quarterly. Rail - Customer Satisfaction Bus - Customer Satisfaction 95% 85% 90% 80% 85% 75% 80% QTR 1 QTR 2 QTR 3 QTR 4 FY2008 FY2007 Goal 70% QTR 1 QTR 2 QTR 3 QTR 4 FY2008 FY2007 Goal Escalator - Customer Satisfaction Elevator - Customer Satisfaction 68% 78% 66% 76% 64% 74% 62% 72% 60% QTR 1 QTR 2 QTR 3 QTR 4 70% QTR 1 QTR 2 QTR 3 QTR 4 FY2008 FY2007 Goal FY2008 FY2007 Goal

WMATA Indicators MEASURMENT FY07 FY08 YTD Nov FY08 Target Status RAIL On-Time (incl. all causes of delays) 89% 90% 89% 95% Safety and Security Part 1 Crimes, Excluding Parking 399 192 24 310 Part 1 Crimes in Parking 890 413 119 711 Metrorail Patron Injuries 429 115 N/A 315 Customer Satisfaction: Metrorail Customer Satisfaction Survey* 87% 84% N/A 89% Avg Weekday Ridership 701,110 730,143 710,115 711,245 BUS Mean Distance Between Service Interruptions 2,928 2,695 2,908 3,100 Safety and Security Part 1 Crimes 103 54 8 98 Metrobus Patron Injuries 854 261 N/A 714 Customer Satisfaction: Metrobus Customer Satisfaction Survey* 81% 79% N/A 81% Avg Weekday Ridership 441,221 453,937 439,918 445,054 VERTICAL TRANSPORTATION Escalator System Availability 91.3% 94.5% 95.3% 95% Elevator System Availability 95.2% 96.6% 97.3% 97.5% Safety: Passenger Injuries per Million Passengers Esc & Elev Passenger Injuries per Million Passengers 1.16 1.6 1.20 1.13 Customer Satisfaction Measure: Customer Satisfaction Survey - Escalator* 63% 66% N/A 64% Customer Satisfaction Survey - Elevator* 74% 72% N/A 78% METROACCESS On-time 93.2% 91.9% 90.6% 93.5% Percent of Missed/Excessively Late Trips 1.9 1.61 1.98 1.9 (30 mins beyond the scheduled pick-up window) Safety: Accidents Per 100,000 Miles 3.6 3.7 3.7% 2.9 Customer Satisfaction Measure Customer Satisfaction Survey* Total Complaints per 1,000 trips 9.1 8.8 9.8 3.5/5.0 Average Weekday Ridership (for comparison only) 4,669 4,819 4,803 4,850 High probability of achieving FY08 target (on track) Uncertain if the FY08 target will be met - slight problems and/or delays High probablity that the FY08 target will not be met *Only reported quarterly