UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Similar documents
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

ORDER SELECTING AIR CARRIERS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

ORDER REQUESTING PROPOSALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 12 th day of February, 2016 FINAL ORDER ISSUING INTERSTATE CERTIFICATE

Office of Aviation Analysis (X50), Department of Transportation (DOT).

BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, DC

BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, DC

BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, DC

Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 26 th day of May, 2015

Extension of Effective Date for the Helicopter Air Ambulance, Commercial. Helicopter, and Part 91 Helicopter Operations Final Rule

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E airspace at Akutan Airport, Akutan,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

AVIATION COMMUNICATION AND SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS, LLC

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-147-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

OPERATING LIMITATIONS AT NEW YORK LAGUARDIA AIRPORT. SUMMARY: This action extends the Order Limiting Operations at New York LaGuardia

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-180-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2015-CE-030-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-CE-036-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-291-AD; Amendment ; AD R1]

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-031-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-SW-077-AD] Airworthiness Directives; Scotts-Bell 47 Inc. (Type Certificate Previously Held by

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2016-NE-14-AD] Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca S.A. Turboshaft Engines

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2018-NM-029-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

Etihad Airways P.J.S.C.

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2013-CE-028-AD] Airworthiness Directives; DORNIER LUFTFAHRT GmbH Airplanes

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-NM-205-AD; Amendment. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

Operating Limitations At John F. Kennedy International Airport. SUMMARY: This action amends the Order Limiting Operations at John F.

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-CE-042-AD] Airworthiness Directives; GA 8 Airvan (Pty) Ltd Airplanes

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-101-AD] Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

Joint Application of CONTINENTAL, UNITED, and AVIANCA, filed 8/29/2011 for:

Amendment Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-141-AD

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2016-NE-22-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

MD HELICOPTERS, INC.

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-NM-043-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

BF Goodrich Avionics Systems, Inc. SKYWATCH SKY497

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2018-NM-039-AD] AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-NM-050-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

Amendment Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-014-AD

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-124-AD] Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

BOMBARDIER, INC.

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2018-NE-35-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORPORATION MODELS B300 AND B300C (C-12W) AIRPLANES

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2018-NM-179-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-NE-32-AD] Airworthiness Directives; Honeywell International Inc.

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2018-CE-012-AD; Amendment. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-025-AD; Amendment. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

VARIOUS RESTRICTED CATEGORY HELICOPTERS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-NM-111-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2018-NE-01-AD] Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company Turbofan Engines

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-NM-098-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2018-NM-095-AD; Amendment. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-SW-004-AD] Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (Type Certificate

SUPERSEDED. [Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2011-SW-005-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2013-NE-10-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2018-NE-09-AD] Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Corporation Engines

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2018-NE-16-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2012-NE-34-AD] Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca S.A. Turboshaft Engines

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2015-CE-018-AD] Airworthiness Directives; PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2018-NE-02-AD; Amendment 39-

SUPERSEDED. [Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2015-SW-014-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

Proposed Establishment of Class D Airspace; Bryant AAF, Anchorage, AK. SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class D airspace at Bryant Army

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-NM-158-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-205-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2018-NM-176-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-026-AD; Amendment. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON (BELL)

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-NM-074-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-NM-200-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2015-CE-028-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

THE BOEING COMPANY

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2013-SW-030-AD] Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky) Helicopters

R1 BOMBARDIER, INC.

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2018-NM-068-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-CE-041-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-NM-208-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2018-NM-096-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-002-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2018-NE-35-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-NM-159-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

SUPERSEDED [ U] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Federal Aviation Administration. 14 CFR Part 39 [66 FR /5/2001]

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-NM-152-AD; Amendment. Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Aviation Airplanes

Transcription:

Order: 2014-9-16 Served: September 24, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 24 th day of September, 2014 Essential Air Service at AKUTAN, ALASKA DOT-OST-2000-7068 Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq. ORDER RESELECTING CARRIER Summary By this Order, the Department reselects Grant Aviation, Inc. (Grant) to provide Essential Air Service (EAS) at Akutan, Alaska, for a new contract period from October 1, 2014, through September 30, 2016, at an annual subsidy rate of $831,115. (See Appendix A for a map.) Background By Order 2012-11-15, November 16, 2012, the Department selected Grant to provide EAS at Akutan for an initial annual subsidy rate of $724,025 for the first six months of service, and $579,220 annually for the remainder of the contract term (through September 30, 2014). Under that contract, Akutan receives 12 nonstop round trips per week to Dutch Harbor with 9-seat Piper PA-31 Navajo aircraft. Grant began service to the community on November 28, 2012. In anticipation of the end of the current contract period, we issued Order 2014-6-3 on June 6, 2014, requesting proposals from carriers interested in providing EAS at Akutan for a new contract period. In response to our request we received only one proposal, from Grant, the incumbent carrier. The carrier s complete proposal and community comments can be accessed online at www.regulations.gov by entering DOT-OST-2000-7068 in the search box. Therefore, we will only briefly summarize the proposals and comments below. Unique Situation at Akutan EAS at Akutan had traditionally been provided via the Akutan Seaplane Base. For years, that service was operated by Peninsula Airways, Inc. (PenAir) using a Grumman Goose aircraft, which was particularly suited to land on waters that are typical for the Aleutians that were too rough for other seaplanes to land on. However, the aircraft was very old with no suitable replacement, and, thus, its retirement was forthcoming. 1 1 PenAir retired the aircraft in November 2012.

-2- In September 2012, the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities commissioned a new airport (7AK) with a paved 4,500 foot runway, on Akun Island, about 7 miles from Akutan. Prior to the last EAS carrier-selection case, both the State and community indicated that they would prefer service to the new airport rather than the seaplane base at Akutan. Under the current EAS contract, Grant provides service between Dutch Harbor and 7AK. Initially, the Aleutians East Borough subsidized a hovercraft operation to transport passengers, cargo, and mail between 7AK and Akutan. This service proved to be financially unsustainable. Currently, the community has contracted with a helicopter service to provide a link between 7AK and Akutan. While helicopter service has proven more reliable, it still presents a significant financial burden for the community. Under either scenario, passengers are required to buy a separate ticket, in addition to the EAS service, for passage between 7AK and Akutan. Proposal of Grant Grant s proposal contained one service option, to continue providing twelve (12) weekly nonstop roundtrips between 7AK and Dutch Harbor. Grant will utilize either Beech Kingair 200 or Piper PA-31-350 aircraft. Both aircraft have nine passenger seats and are equipped with twin-engines. In order to provide this service, Grant requires an annual subsidy of $831,115. The proposal made no provision to transport persons or cargo from 7AK over to Akutan. Community Comments On July 15, 2014, we solicited comments from the community of Akutan regarding the air carrier selection case. On August 13, 2014, we received comments from the Aleutians East Borough and the City of Akutan. The Borough indicated that it supports Grant s proposal, but would like to see a different flight schedule adopted by the carrier. The City similarly supported Grant s proposal but also would like to see an adjustment to their flight schedule. Decision The decision in this case is straightforward. Grant was the only applicant, it has been providing reliable service at Akutan, and it has received the support of the community. We note, however, that while we find Grant s service level and subsidy request to be reasonable, its subsidy requirement has increased significantly since the last carrier-selection case. We note that the community requested that Grant modify its flight schedule from what it has historically operated. While we guarantee a minimum service level (in this case, twelve weekly roundtrips), we do not prescribe a specific schedule that the carrier must operate. However, we encourage Grant and the community to work together in order to develop a mutually agreeable schedule which satisfies the communities needs and the commercial and operational requirements of the carrier. Carrier Fitness 49 U.S.C. 41737(b) and 41738 require that DOT find an air carrier fit, willing, and able to provide reliable service before DOT may subsidize it to provide Essential Air Service. Grant is subject to the Department s continuing fitness requirements, and no information has come to our attention that would cause us to question the carrier s fitness at this time. DOT has contacted the Federal Aviation Administration, and it has raised no concerns that would negatively affect our fitness findings. DOT therefore concludes that the carrier remains fit to conduct the operations proposed here. This Order is issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR Part 1.25a(b).

-3- ACCORDINGLY, 1. We reselect Grant Aviation, Inc., to provide Essential Air Service at Akutan, Alaska, as described in Appendix C; 2. We direct Grant Aviation, Inc., to retain all books, records, and other source and summary documentation to support claims for payment, and to preserve and maintain such documentation in a manner that readily permits its audit and examination by representatives of the Department. Such documentation shall be retained for seven years from the date of service of this Order, or until the Department indicates that the records may be destroyed, whichever comes first. Copies of flight logs for aircraft sold or disposed of must be retained. The carrier may forfeit its compensation for any claim that is not supported under the terms of this Order; 3. We find that Grant Aviation, Inc., continues to be fit, willing and able to operate as certificated air carrier and capable of providing reliable Essential Air Service at Akutan, Alaska; 4. This docket will remain open until further order of the Department; and 5. We will serve copies of this Order on the Aleutians East Borough, the City of Atka, the Division of Statewide Aviation of the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, and Grant Aviation, Inc. By: (SEAL) SUSAN L. KURLAND Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs An electronic version of this document is available at http://www.regulations.gov

AREA MAP APPENDIX A Page 1 of 2

APPENDIX A Page 2 of 2

APPENDIX B

Grant Aviation, Inc., Essential Air Service to be Provided to Akutan, Alaska, Docket: OST-2000-7068 APPENDIX C Effective Period: October 1, 2014, through September 30, 2016 Scheduled Service: Twelve weekly nonstop roundtrips to Dutch Harbor (7AK to DUT) Aircraft: Twin-engine, nine-passenger Beech Kingair B-200 or Piper PA-31-350 Annual Subsidy: 2 $831,115 Annual Flights: 3 1,248 Rate per flight: 4 $666 Weekly Ceiling: 5 $15,984 Note: The carrier understands that it may forfeit its compensation for any flights that it does not operate in conformance with the terms and stipulations of the rate Order, including the service plans outlined in the Order and any other significant elements of the required service, without prior approval. The carrier understands that an aircraft take-off and landing at its scheduled destination constitutes a completed flight; absent an explanation supporting subsidy eligibility for a flight that has not been completed, such as certain weather cancellations, only completed flights are considered eligible for subsidy. In addition, if the carrier does not schedule or operate its flights in full conformance with the Order for a significant period, it may jeopardize its entire subsidy claim for the period in question. If the carrier contemplates any such changes beyond the scope of the Order during the applicable period of these rates, it must first notify the Office of Aviation Analysis in writing and receive written approval from the Department to be ensured of full compensation. Should circumstances warrant, the Department may locate and select a replacement carrier to provide service on these routes. The carrier must complete all flights that can be safely operated; flights that overfly points for lack of traffic will not be compensated. In determining whether subsidy payment for a deviating flight should be adjusted or disallowed, the Department will consider the extent to which the goals of the program are met and the extent of access to the national air transportation system provided to the community. If the Department unilaterally, either partially or complete, terminates or reduces payments for service or changes service requirements at a specific location provided for under this Order, then, at the end of the period for which the Department does make payments in the stipulated amounts or at the stipulated service levels, the carrier may cease to provide service to that specific location without regard to any requirement for notice of such cessation. Those adjustments in the levels of subsidy and/or service that are mutually agreed to in writing by the Department and carrier do not constitute a total or partial reduction or cessation of payment. Subsidy contracts are subject to, and incorporate by reference, relevant statutes and Department regulations, as they may be amended from time to time. However, any such statutes, regulations, or amendments thereto shall not operate to controvert the foregoing paragraph. Funds may not be available for performance under this Order beyond September 30, 2014. The Government s obligation for performance under this Order beyond September 30, 2014, is subject to the availability of funds from which payment for services can be made. No legal liability on the part of the Government for any payment may arise for performance under this Order beyond September 30, 2014, until funds are made available to the Department for performance. If sufficient funds are not made available for performance beyond September 30, 2014, the Department will provide notice in writing to the carrier. All claims for payment, including any amended claims, must be submitted within 90 days of the last day of the month for which compensation is being claimed. For example, claims for service provided in July must be filed by October 31 st ; August claims must be submitted by November 30 th, and so on. 2 See Appendix B. 3 12 roundtrips per week x 2 directions x 52 weeks = 1,248 4 Annual subsidy divided by annual flights. 5 Rate per flight x weekly flights.