Title VI Service Monitoring Program

Similar documents
2016 Title VI Program. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA)

The 15-day comment period will run from Thursday, April 4, 2019 to 4pm on Wednesday April 18, 2019.

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

These elements are designed to make service more convenient, connected, and memorable.

Presentation to Board of Directors on All-Door Boarding System-wide Implementation

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California

Lessons Learned from Rebuilding the Muni Subway Schedule Leslie Bienenfeld

DRAFT Service Implementation Plan

Appendix G. Service Monitoring Report

Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development

Limited English Proficiency Plan

S Between Grand Central Station and Times Square, Manhattan

Rides Mass Transit District. Jackson County Mass Transit District. FY 2020 Program of Projects (POP) Carbondale UZA

PREFACE. Service frequency; Hours of service; Service coverage; Passenger loading; Reliability, and Transit vs. auto travel time.

JATA Market Research Study Passenger Survey Results

CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards

Methodology and coverage of the survey. Background

All Door Boarding Title VI Service Fare Analysis. Appendix P.3

Public Transport Planning and Regulation: An Introduction

FY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission

Why we re here: For educational purposes only

COMMUTING MASS TRANSPORT CALCULATOR GUIDE Version 1.0

USERS of EXISTING TOLL FACILITIES in HAMPTON ROADS

Like many transit service providers, the Port Authority of Allegheny County (Port Authority) uses a set of service level guidelines to determine

2.0 Miami-Dade Transit System Overview

CHAPTER 5: Operations Plan

Service Plan

Silver Line Operating Plan

[Transportation Code Designated Speed Limits]

I-95 Transit/ TDM Study. LRTP Advisory Committee Meeting June 22, 2017

ARRIVAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PASSENGERS INTENDING TO USE PUBLIC TRANSPORT

Establishes a fare structure for Tacoma Link light rail, to be implemented in September 2014.

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015

ADA PARATRANSIT PLAN. Twin Cities Area Transportation Authority 275 East Wall Benton Harbor, MI 49022

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY

WESTERN EL DORADO COUNTY SHORT AND LONG-RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Executive Summary

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

NUMBER CRUNCHING FOR DUMMIES. Collecting, Identifying, Presenting, and Developing an Effective Planning Strategy Amid Billions and Billions of Records

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT DECEMBER 2015

Directional Price Discrimination. in the U.S. Airline Industry

YARTS ON-BOARD SURVEY MEMORANDUM

Schedule Effective 6/8/14

1 Introduction 2 2 Acknowledgements 2 3 Differences between Green Star SA rating tools 2 4 About the Calculator 2 5 How to Use the Calculator 2

Approval of August 2019 Service Changes

Q103. Astoria and Hunters Point. Between. Local Service. Bus Timetable. Effective Winter MTA Bus Company

DEMOGRAPHICS AND EXISTING SERVICE

TRANSPORTATION SERVICE Actual

WORCESTER REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY TITLE VI REPORT MARCH 2018

Americans with Disabilities (ADA) Paratransit Plan

October REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

STA MOVING FORWARD A plan for more and better transit services

PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD. Title VI Equity Analysis Proposed Weekend Service Changes FY2017 March

II. Terminology and Basic

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

Mobile Farebox Repair Program: Setting Standards & Maximizing Regained Revenue

2017 Proposed Service Changes. For Public Meetings January 2017

Schedule ROUTE. Weekend. Broward County Transit

ACRP Synthesis 36 Exploring Airport Employee Commute and Parking Strategies. Diane M. Ricard, Principal DMR Consulting.

BaltimoreLink Implementation Status Report

Statistics Report. April Page 1

Bus Timetable Effective April 4, 2010

Proposition E: Municipal Transportation Quality Review

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

Schedule ROUTE. Weekday. Broward County Transit

Q67. Ridgewood and Long Island City. Between. Local Service. Bus Timetable. Effective Winter MTA Bus Company

September 2014 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management Sub-Regional Report PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Sound Transit Operations June 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Current Rules Part 175 Aeronautical Information Service Organisations - Certification Pending Rules

4. Proposed Transit Improvements

1 DEMAND RESPONSE OVERVIEW

Schedule ROUTE. All Week. Broward County Transit

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) Travel Decision Survey 2012

Report of. Transport Key Performance Indicators

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Word Count: 3,565 Number of Tables: 4 Number of Figures: 6 Number of Photographs: 0. Word Limit: 7,500 Tables/Figures Word Count = 2,250

Travel Decision Survey Summary Report. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA)

Manual vs. Automatic Operation and Operational Restrictions

Prior to reviewing the various performances of Red Apple Transit, it is important to point out some key terminology, including:

Planning, Engineering & Construction Department September 2017

Mount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! wmata.com/bus

Chapter 1 Introduction and Project Overview

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

Performance Measurement:

November 9, Society of American Military Engineers

Project Advisory Group. May 23, 2013

Sample Terms & Conditions for special authorization licences

Treasure Island Supplemental Information Report Addendum

Santa Monica Airport Application for Commercial Operations Permit (Please note this is a public document)

North Shore Area Transit Plan

Wake Bus Plan. Short Range Transit Plans. Proposed Transit Service Projects and Changes. GoCary. Volume 3 DRAFT

Schedule ROUTE. Weekend. Broward County Transit

Schedule ROUTE. All Week. Broward County Transit

2018 OPERATING BUDGET BRIEFING NOTE Toronto Transit Commission: Options to Address Bus Overcrowding, Bus Availability & Garage Storage Capacity

Table of Contents. List of Tables

Transcription:

SFMTA Municipal Transportation Agency Image: Historic Car number 1 and 162 on Embarcadero Title VI Service Monitoring Program 11 5 2013 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Title VI Overview Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 addressed discrimination in most areas of public life in the U.S. Title VI states: No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Monitors transit providers for Title VI compliance; updated circular issued October 1, 2012 (FTA C 402.1B) provides guidance for transit agencies receiving federal funds 2

Monitoring Program As part of Title VI program requirements, SFMTA is required to monitor performance of minority routes compared to non-minority routes compared to service standards Required to perform service monitoring at least every three years; SFMTA will perform annually as a best practice Performed on all routes Required to monitor from a random sample: On-Time Performance Headways Passenger loads Coverage Amenities Fleet Assignment 3

How Does the SFMTA Define Minority Population Census block group with minority residents at or above the Citywide average of 58% On-board passenger survey underway to supplement geographic information (will not be available for 2013 Title VI program update) 4

Non-minority Block Group Minority Block Group 5

On-Time Performance Standard: Proposition E on-time performance standard is 85% Performance: No minority or non-minority lines met the standard and no disparate impact found Minority routes out performed non-minority routes in radial bus and crosstown route types Route Type Minority Route Average Non-Minority Route Average Radial Rail 42% 46% Radial Bus 62% 60% Crosstown 63% 61% Feeder/Comm unity 64% 68% Radial Express 71% 73% 6

Vehicle Headways Service standards for headways (route frequency): Route Type Weekday Weekend Peak Base Evening Owl Base Evening Owl Radial 10 15 20 30 15 20 30 Cross-town 15 15 20 30 20 30 30 Feeder/Community 20 30 30 -- 30 30 -- Express 10 -- -- -- -- -- -- Performance: Minority lines met the service standard more often than non-minority lines in all categories except for crosstown. Disparate impact found on crosstown routes. Route Type Minority Route Average Non-Minority Route Average Radial Rail 100% 100% Radial Bus 74% 63% Crosstown 63% 97% Feeder/Community 94% 88% Radial Express 81% 80% 7

Vehicle Loads Standard: No more than 4% of peak period trips experiencing a load factor of 125% during the morning and evening peak Performance: All below standard except for non-minority radial rail routes. Minority routes performed better or similarly to non-minority routes. No disparate impact found. AM Peak (6-9AM) PM Peak (4-7PM) Route Type Minority Non-Minority Minority Non-Minority Radial Rail 0.00% 5.7% 0.0% 9.6% Radial Bus 0.04% 0.2% 0.3% 0.4% Crosstown 0.6% 0.2% 0.36% 0.28% Feeder/Community 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Radial Express 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8

All residential areas are within a quarter mile of a bus stop Areas further than a quarter mile are located in the Presidio, Lake Merced, Hunter s Point Shipyard, and Candlestick Point Service Availability 9

Standards: Transit Amenities All stops have a stop ID and are marked Stops with more than 125 daily boardings have a shelter within environmental constraints Powered and sheltered stops should get real-time arrival displays Performance: Disparate impact found. Non-minority stops were more likely to have shelters and real time displays. We are prioritizing shelter installations in minority areas. Seven of the last nine new shelters have been in minority areas. Stops with 125 or More Boardings Percent with Real-Time Displays Percent with Shelters Stops in Minority Census Block Groups 480 58% 41% Stops in Non-Minority Census Block Groups 597 66% 48% 10

Vehicle Assignment Vehicles assigned to divisions based on maintenance capabilities and capacity Assigned to routes randomly based on division Performance: No disparate impact. Newest buses at divisions with highest proportion of minority routes. Division Mode Average Age (Years) Percentage of Lines that are Minority at Division Green Light Rail 18 17% Metro East Light Rail 18 17% Flynn Articulated Motor Coach 11 71% Kirkland Forty Foot Motor Coach 12 13% Thirty and Forty Foot Motor Woods Coach 8 62% Forty Foot and Articulated Trolley Coach 11 14% Potrero Presidio Forty Foot Trolley Coach 13 14% Geneva Historic Streetcar Varies - Historic 0% Cable Car Cable Car Varies - Historic 67% 11

Next Steps Met with the Citizens Advisory Committee on October 3rd Present to the SFMTA Board of Directors November 5th Submit to FTA by December 1st 12